GET THE APP

Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Differences
Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9600

Research Article - (2014) Volume 4, Issue 6

Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Differences in the Content of Minerals and Studies in Healthy and Induced Cancer Rats

Carvalho DC1*, Picheli FP1, Luccas PO1, Magalhaes CS1 and Azevedo L2
1Institute of Chemistry, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil, E-mail: dayene@feq.ufu.br
2Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil, E-mail: dayene@feq.ufu.br
*Corresponding Author: Carvalho DC, Faculdade de Engenharia Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia – MG, Avenida Getulio Vargas, 230, CEP: 38700-000, Patos De Minas, MG, Brazil, Fax: (+55) 34 9667-1526

Abstract

Coffee is one of the most important agricultural products in international trade. The agricultural management system may influence the chemical composition of the beans in addition to altering the bioavailability of nutrients essential for humans. Therefore, the concentrations of Cu, Fe, Zn and the proximate composition of powder and coffee infusions from beans grown under organic or conventional agricultural systems were evaluated. In addition, the effect of these products on hepatic mineral content in vivo was investigated, in healthy and induced cancer rats. Our results showed that the levels of Cu, Fe and Zn were higher in conventional coffee powder than in organic powder. However, despite these differences, the organic coffee had higher extraction yield for all infuses, and its infusion at 20% (w/v) had higher level of Zn than conventional infusion. These results were associated with the agricultural system used and the extraction process employed during the preparation of infusions. The conventional coffee provides more adsorbent compounds, decreasing the availability of this mineral in the beverage. In terms of the mineral content in vivo, the ingestion of diets prepared with infusions or coffee powder did not influence the hepatic content of Cu, Fe and Zn.

Keywords: Coffee Arabica L.; Organic; Conventional; Micro minerals; Hepatic composition

Introduction

Coffee is one of the most important agricultural products in international trade. In 2009-2010, the amount of Coffea arabica exported throughout the world was approximately 62 million bags [1]. The area of production of conventionally grown coffee has increased [2], and this growth causes environmental impacts. The excessive application of chemical fertilizers and agricultural defensives (quantity and frequency), which usually exceeds the retention capacity of the soil, causes an imbalance in the ecosystem. To minimize these impacts, there is a consumption incentive for organically managed products, which have high prices compared to conventional products, despite the designation of quality and certification [3].

The International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM) defines organic agriculture as "all agricultural systems that promote environmental, socially and economically safe production of food and fibers"[4]. However, the use of organic matter for the fertilization of coffee can interfere in the equilibrium of metals in the soil because organic acids act as ligands for many metals and the soil composition of these elements is reflected in the food [5,6]. Some studies have demonstrated differences between organic and conventionally produced coffee in terms of nutrients [7,8]. Among the nutrients, Cu, Zn and other toxic elements, such as Cd and Cr contained in some inorganic and organic fertilizers, can be increased in concentration in the soil and consequently be taken up by the plants [5].

Coffee consumption occurs mainly in the form of an infusion, resulting in one of the most appreciated and consumed beverages in the world [1]. The chemical composition of the drink is quite variable and is largely dependent on the species used [9-11]. and the system of management [2,5,7]. The concentrations of Fe, Cu and Zn, which are of acknowledged nutritional importance, in the infusion are the consequence of their levels in roasted beans, their physical-chemical characteristics (sorption) and the preparation conditions (filter paper and concentration).

Coffee is often consumed for its stimulatory effects owing to its phytochemistry, such as caffeine (the most prominent) [12], chlorogenic acid, lignans and some minerals components, which possess therapeutic potential, providing protection against cardiovascular diseases [13], diabetes mellitus [14], Parkinson’s disease [15], Alzeheimer’s disease [16], carcinogenesis [17] and antioxidants [7], as also observed in some drug treatments [18,19]. These aspects are highlighted since the coffee holds second position in consumption among all beverages after water [20].

However, some compounds in coffee like caffeine interact with some xenobiotics especially in women taking hormones to cure postmenopausal problems, in addition to other such as melanoidins and phenolic polymers, which can interact with the minerals present in the diet, interfering with their bioavailability [21,22].

Cu, Fe and Zn are essential micro minerals, whose absorption is relatively low and bioavailability subject to dietary, physiological and pathological factors, e.g. gastrointestinal tract cancers [23]. Besides, the neoplasms are also related to Zn and Fe deficiencies in animals and humans [24-26]. However, other studies have shown that higher levels these micro minerals in diet also can affects the tissues, such as liver [27,28]. Therefore, the aim of this work was to evaluate the concentrations of Cu, Fe, and Zn in coffee (powdered and infusions) from two different management systems (organic and conventional), and to investigate the hepatic mineral content in healthy and induced cancer rats, fed with these coffees.

Materials and Methods

Coffee samples and chemicals

To minimize the influence of environmental factors in the analysis, all samples of coffee were produced in the same geographic region and were harvested during the 2008-2009 season. So, any differences found can be attributed predominantly to the genotypic characteristics of the coffee and to the agricultural management style [7]. The samples of ground roasted coffee were from the 2008-2009 crop, Catuai red variety, and medium-roasted (200 - 215°C) for 15 min. The organic and conventionally grown samples were provided by the Association of Small Producers of Poco Fundo, Minas Gerais, Brazil, and the organic coffee was certified (BCS - OKO Garantie Master Certificates No POCO-7569/07.08/14291-BR). Fertilization of the organic coffee was with castor cake, and the conventional coffee was fertilized with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (20:5:20).

All solutions were prepared with analytical grade reagents and deionized water (Milli-Q, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). For the preparation of the samples and standards, the following chemicals were used: Zn (1000 mg L-1), H2O2 30% (v/v), ferric chloride hexahydrate as the Fe stock solution (1000 mg L-1) and cupric sulfate prepared as the Cu stock solution (1000 mg L-1), which were obtained from Merck (San Diego, CA, USA); nitric acid (65% v/v) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Laboratory glassware was kept overnight in a 10% (v/v) nitric acid solution. This glassware was rinsed with deionized water and freshly dried in a dust-free environment before use.

Proximate composition of coffee samples

A compositional analysis of all the samples (moisture, fat, protein, ash and carbohydrate) was performed in triplicate. Moisture was determined by loss while drying with an Infrared IV200 Moisture Analyzer (Gehaka) for 8 min at 120°C [29]. The total nitrogen content was analyzed by the Kjeldahl procedure (the conversion factor was 6.25 to protein), and carbohydrates were calculated to the remainder (the difference using the fresh weight-derived). The ash content was determined by the incineration of samples at 550°C in a muffle furnace. Fat content was measured in a Soxhlet system by extraction with solvent [30].

Sample preparation and Cu, Fe, Zn determination

The infusions were prepared in amounts equivalent to the average coffee consumption of the population (10% w/v), its half (5% w/v) and its double (20% w/v). Thus, 5, 10 and 20 g of coffee were added to 100 mL of water at 90°C and followed by vacuum filtration using qualitative paper filters (Framex, model 389/3) [7]. The infusions were reduced to1/4 of the total volume at 60ºC.

The rats liver and experimental diets were homogenized and dried at 105ºC, until reaching constant weight [30]. For the destruction of organic matter, the microwave-assisted acid digestion was used (Millestone® Ethos Plus microwave digestion system, Sorisole, Bergamo, Italy). Before digestion, all the samples were conditioned with HNO3 and H2O2 for 30 min at room temperature. The heating program utilized (sample masses (n=4), the volumes of HNO3 and H2O2) is described in Table 1. The samples digested were transferred to glass volumetric flasks, and the volume was brought to 25 mL with deionized water (Table 1).

Samples Quantities of samples HNO3
(mL)
H2O2
(mL)
Digestion program  
Steps Time
(min)
Power
(W)
Temperature
(ºC)
References
Coffee powder 300 (mg) 7 1 1 5 750 120 45
(n=4)     2 3 750 120
      3 10 750 210
      4 15 750 210
Coffee infusion* 2 (mL) 5 1 1 5 400 80 46
(n=4)     2 5 400 120
      3 5 400 210
Rat livers
and diets
300 (mg) 6 2 1 3 250 130 46
(n=4)     2 5 630 130
      3 22 500 130
      4 15 0 130

*All infusion volumes were reduced to 1/4 of the initial volume.

Table 1: Conditions of digestion program used in coffee samples, rat livers and diets.

The analytes Cu, Fe and Zn were determined using a flame atomic absorption spectrometer (FAAS) Shimadzu® AA-6800 (Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a deuterium background corrector. The hollow cathode lamps (Perkin-Elmer) for Cu (λ=324.8 nm), Fe (λ=248.3 nm) and Zn (λ=213.9 nm) were used. The operation conditions for FAAS were those described in the apparatus manual. The air-acetylene gas mixture was 2.0 - 1.8 mL min-1 for all analytes. For the standard preparations, the salts were dried at 105°C for 12 h and then cooled in a desiccator. For analytical curves, the standard concentrations for Cu and Zn were 0.1 - 2.5 mg L-1and 0.5 - 6.0 mg L-1 for Fe. The limits of detection (LOD) and the limits of quantification (LOQ) were calculated according to the procedures of the International Union Pure and Applied Chemistry [31], and the accuracy was verified using a recovery test in all samples by adding an amount of standard equal to 1.0 mg L-1 [32].

Animal experiments and the isolation of liver samples

One hundred and forty animals were randomly allocated into fourteen groups (n=10) (Table 2). The University Ethical Committee for Animal Research approved the protocols used in this study (protocol no. 235/09). We used 4-week-old male Wistar rats obtained from Centro Multidisciplinar para Investigacao Biologica (CEMIB) (UNICAMP Campinas, SP, Brazil). The animals were kept in polypropylene cages (5 rats/cage) covered with metallic grids and maintained at 22 ± 2°C, 55 ± 10% humidity and with 12 h lightdark cycles. They were fed commercial Nuvilab CR-1® diets (Nuvital Nutriente S/A, Colombo, PR, Brazil). For the preparation of modified diets, organic and conventional coffees in powder or infusion form were used. The infusions (5, 10 and 20% w/v) were prepared as described above. To incorporate the infusions in the commercial diet, a proportion of 100 mL of infusion per kg of commercial diet was used. This proportion allowed an appropriate pelleted diet. The significance of fiber as modulator of physiological and pathological processes prompted us to explore new potential applications. This way, the powdered coffee was incorporated in the proportion of 40 g powder per kg of diet [7]. After pelleting and drying, the conventional (COC) and the organic (ORC) coffee diets containing infusions of 5, 10 or 20% (w/v), or 4% (w/w) powder were obtained. These diets were fed to the animals for 12 weeks (Table 2).

Group/
Treatment
nº of rats chemicals form of coffee applied diet
G1/commercial 10 DMH - CD
G2/organic 10 DMH 5% infusion ORC 5%*
G3/organic 10 DMH 10% infusion ORC 10%
G4/organic 10 DMH 20% infusion ORC 20%
G5/organic 10 DMH powder ORC 4%
G6/conventional 10 DMH 5% infusion COC 5%
G7/conventional 10 DMH 10% infusion COC 10%
G8/conventional 10 DMH 20% infusion COC 20%
G9/conventional 10 DMH powder COC 4%
G10/commercial 10 EDTA - CD
G11/organic 10 EDTA 20% infusion ORC 20%
G12/organic 10 EDTA powder ORC 4%
G13/conventional 10 EDTA 20% infusion RCC 20%
G14/conventional 10 EDTA powder RCC 4%

DMH=1,2-dimetilhidrazine (40mg. Kg,-1 body weight), a promoter of preneoplastic
lesions in the colon. EDTA 1,5% (w/v) in NaCl 0,9% (w/v) (vehicle).
CD=commercial diet; COC=diet with organic coffee; COC=diet with conventional
coffee.*Considering the infusion embedded the feed (incorporated 100 mL
infusion/kg commercial diet).

Table 2: Experimental design for the 12-weeks experiment to investigate the
hepatic mineral content in healthy and induced cancer animals (DMH), fed with
these coffees.

To assay the effects of coffee in the animals with cancer, groups 1 to 9 received four injections of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH), a carcinogenic drug that induces pre-neoplastic colonic lesions. The doses administered were 40 mg kg-1 body weight, subcutaneous, twice a week, for two weeks (Table 2). In order to study animals without cancer, groups 10 to 14 received similar injections of the control vehicle [etilenediaminetetracetic acid (EDTA) 1.5% w/v] to simulate the stress of injection. At the end of this experimental step, all animals were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine and euthanized by withdrawing blood from the heart. At necropsy, the livers were removed from all animals and stored at -18ºC until analysis [7] (Table 2).

Statistical analysis

In order to verify the differences between organic and conventional managements, the proximate (samples: coffee infusions, powders, diets) and micronutrient analysis (samples: coffee infusions, powders, diets and liver of rats), were compared using the Student’s t test for paired data at 5% confidence level using the software BioEstat® 5.0.

The different mineral extractions from the infusions and the nutritional evolution of the animals (body-mass gain, diet consumption and consumption per animal per day of coffee powder) was examined with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA/Tukey’s test, p<0.05) using the software Sisvar® 5.1.

Results and Discussion

The results of the nutritional composition analysis revealed no significant differences between the powder and the infusions from either management system (Table 3). These results are in agreement with the Brazilian recommendation of National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance [33].

Samplesa Carbohydrate Ash Fat Protein Moisture
ORC 58.30 ± 1.50 4.14 ± 0.27 18.76 ± 0.21 17.94 ± 0.56 0.81  ± 0.02
COC 58.36 ± 0.17 4.36 ± 0.01 18.59 ± 0.01 17.80 ± 0.07 0.79  ± 0.03
IORC 5% 0.10 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.00 1.29 ± 0.33 98.54 ± 0.01
ICOC 5% 0.10 ± 0.01 0.21 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.01 1.37  ± 0.08 98.49 ± 0.21
IORC 10% 0.10 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.02 1.58 ± 0.16 97.40 ± 0.02
ICOC 10% 0.10 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.01 0.19  ± 0.01 1.68 ± 0.09 97.42 ± 0.01
IORC 20% 0.11 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.06 0.31 ± 0.01 2.89  ± 0.17 94.96 ± 0.04
ICOC 20% 0.11 ± 0.02 0.73 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.01 2.68  ± 0.14 94.94 ± 0.01

COC=conventional coffee; ORC=organic coffee; ICOC=infusion conventional coffee; IORC=infusion organic coffee. No statistic difference by Student’s t-test (p<0.05).

Table 3: Proximate analyses of powder and infusion (organic and conventional coffee) samples (mean ± SD) (g 100 g-1) (n=4).

The micromineral contents were determined, and the LOD/LOQ for Cu, Fe and Zn were 0.065/0.215 mg L-1, 0.127/0.424 mg L-1 and 0.024/0.081 mg L-1, respectively. To check the accuracy, the recovery varied from 95 to 103% for all samples. The measurement precision, checked from variation coefficients of readings in triplicate, was always lower than 3% [32].

The conventional coffee powder contained higher concentrations of Cu, Fe and Zn than the organic powder (Table 4). This result can be attributed to the common use of chemical fertilizers in the conventional management system, which provide higher levels of N, P, K, S, Fe, Mn, Cu, B, Cd and Zn [5] compared to the natural fertilizer (castor cake) used in organic management systems [2,8]. These results demonstrate the influence of agricultural management in the amount and availability of minerals (Table 4).

Samples Cu Fe Zn
ORC 21.29 ± 0.47a 40.93± 0.88a 22.22 ± 0.59a
COC 25.03 ± 0.22b 45.70± 0.51b 27.08 ± 0.99b
IORC 5% 2.53  ± 0.12a
ICOC 5% 2.73 ± 0.12a
IORC 10% 2.50  ± 0.20a
ICOC 10% 2.27 ± 0.06a
IORC 20% 2.93 ± 0.03a
ICOC 20% 1.80  ± 0.03b

conventional coffee; ORC=organic coffee; ICOC=infusion conventional coffee; IORC=infusion organic coffee; LOD=limit of detection. a,b Statistical difference of powders and between each infusions concentration by Student’s t-test (p<0.05).

Table 4: Mineral composition of the powder and the coffee infusions (mg kg-1) (mean ± SD) (n=4).

Mineral composition of the powder and the coffee infusions (mg kg-1) (mean ± SD) (n=4).

In the infusion studies, we observed that although Cu and Fe were present in higher concentrations than Zn in the powdered coffee, they were poorly extracted by the infusion method and their concentrations were lower than the LOD, independently from the agricultural management system (Table 4). Therefore, they were strongly adsorbed in the powder and/or the paper filter. On the other hand, Zn was detected in all infusions. Furthermore, in the 20% (w/v) infusion prepared from the organic powder, Zn was present at higher levels than in the conventionally managed sample (Table 4).

We observed that although the conventional coffee powder presented higher levels of zinc than organic coffee powder, its extraction yield for all infuses was lower than organic coffee, as showed clearly in Figure 1. This fact can be explained by the relationship between the quantity of water and the powder mass used for each infusion, suggesting that coffee can act as an adsorbent. This may have occurred due to the inherent characteristics of the powder, which contains potential desorption/adsorption properties, mainly due to the roasting process, when the temperature of pyrolysis reaches 220°C. Therefore, the Zn level may be the result of the interaction of Zn with degraded compounds during the roasting of the coffee, i.e., with the formation of insoluble ZnO in an aqueous solution [34] or by the interaction of Zn with hydrosoluble compounds of samples that may have eluted during filtration [35,36] This adsorbent property of coffee was used by Boonamnuayvitaya et al.,[37] who used the residues produced by the instantaneous coffee manufacturing to remove heavy metal ions in the solution (Figure 1).

nutrition-food-sciences-organic-coffee

Figure 1: Zn extraction yield in organic and conventional infusions.
ICOC = infusion conventional coffee; IORC = infusion organic coffee; a,b,c,d,e Statistical difference among columns. a,b,c,d,e Statistical difference between the columns by ANOVA/Tukey’s test (p<0.05).

The different mineral extraction efficiencies from the infusions may also be compared to the affinity of these elements in carbon-based adsorbents, which vary in the order of Zn+2 < Fe+3/Fe+2 < Cu+2, [38] and to their adsorption in filter paper, which varies in the increasing order of Zn (0.06%), Cu (2.11%) and Fe (5.34%) [39] According to Kononova et al.,[38] the ion affinities may be attributed to the different values of the stability constants of the compounds formed with the functional groups on the surface of the adsorbents. These affinities explain the higher extraction of Zn in the infusion compared to Cu and Fe.

In addition to the adsorption/elution properties and the extraction sequence, which are common to the infusions from both management systems, it is also concluded that coffee from the conventional management system provides more adsorbent compounds and decreases the availability of Zn in the infusion.

Comparing the Zn levels to the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) [40], the usual consumption of 300 mL of a coffee infusion can supply the human body with up to 1.61% of the RDA, then the possible food replacement by coffee in improper diets cannot be performed.

Although the influence of elements of coffee complex matrix on interactions with macronutrients from diet such as fibers or protein, in the mouth or gastrointestinal tract, have been clearly demonstrated in many reports [41,42] a better understanding of these interferences in the diet is essential. For this purpose, we evaluated the possible effects of coffee matrix in the liver of healthy rats or cancer induced (treated with DMH) through the concentration of Fe, Cu and Zn. The infuses and ground coffee were incorporated in the diet for mimicking the common ingestion of coffee together other foods and their possible interactions.

The drug DMH used to induce colon cancer is metabolized in the liver to produce methyl free-radicals, generating hydroxyl radicals or hydrogen peroxide that can induce oxidative damage in vulnerable targets, such as DNA bases, resulting in cancer, inflammation and aging [43]. In this in vivo study, there were no significant differences in the composition of the diets with and without coffee; and the average concentrations in diets were as follows (g 100 g-1): carbohydrate 45.5 ± 5.5, ash 8.8 ± 2.3, lipid 4.9 ± 0.4, protein 27.8 ± 6.4 and humidity 11.8 ± 3.5; and for minerals were (mg kg-1): Cu 35.02 ± 0.72, Fe 113.72 ± 14.53 and Zn 0.16 ± 0.21. The compound levels in the experimental diets are consistent with those suggested by Ammerman et al. [44] and Oliveira et al. [45] and fulfill the needs of the animals. Besides, to ensure study homogeneity, the nutritional parameters of animals showed that there were no significant daily changes in the consumption of the diets (25.5 ± 3.1 g per rat) or in body-mass gain (26.12 ± 9.23 g per rat), for all groups. Based on the diet consumption, the animals from each respective group ingested coffee daily in the following amounts: 0.14 ± 0.01 g (infusion groups 5% w/v), 0.26 ± 0.03 g (infusion groups 10% w/v), 0.54 ± 0.04 g (infusion groups 20% w/v) and 1.03 ± 0.05 g (powdered coffee groups 4% w/v). The proportional consumption of coffee evidenced that the use the diet as vehicle is adequate for this kind of sample. Furthermore, the results showed that the all diets containing coffee (infuses or ground) did not influence the contents of minerals in the livers of all experimental groups, with the following mean values: 0.68 ± 0.05 mg g-1 for Fe and 0.14 ± 0.02 mg g-1 for Zn. Cu was not detected. As the changes in mineral concentrations in the liver, heart, plasma, bone and bile, are indicative of their bioavailability [46-48], we believe that the hepatic content of Cu, Fe and Zn did not suffer from the action of chelating substances, such as brown-melanoidin-like polymers derived from chlorogenic acids, sugars, proteins [22], and fibers in the coffee powder (4% w/w) or the neoplastic action of DMH.

Conclusion

Overall, our results support the conclusion that the mineral content of coffee is influenced by the conditions of agricultural management styles and the extraction process. The levels of Cu, Fe and Zn were higher in conventional coffee powder than in the organic powder. However, despite differences in the powder, the organic coffee had higher extraction yield for all infuses, and its infusion at 20% (w/v) had higher level of Zn than other conventional infusion. Regarding the mineral content in vivo, the ingestion of diets containing infusions or coffee powder did not influence the hepatic content of Cu, Fe and Zn.

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to thank Indian Council of medical research (ICMR), New Delhi for financial support. We also want to thank Shilpa Virdi, Gaurav Sharma and Lekhraj in collection and processing of samples.

References

  1. Santos JS, Santos MLP, Conti MM (2010) Comparative Study of metal contents in Brazilian Coffees Cultivated by Conventional and Organic agriculture applying principal component analysis. J Braz Chem Soc 21: 1468-1476
  2. Dangour AD, Dodhia SK, Hayter A, Allen E, Lock K et al. (2009) Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review Am J Clin Nutr 90: 680-685.
  3. IFOAM (2011) International Federation of Organic Agriculture Moviments.
  4. Santos JS, Santos MLP, Conti MM, Santos SN (2009) Evaluation of some metals in Brazillian coffees cultivated during the process of conversion from conventional to organic agriculture. Food Chem 115: 1405-1410.
  5. Paulose B, Datta SP, Rattan RK, Chhonkar PK (2007) Effect of amendments on the extractability, retention and plant uptake of metals on a sewage-irrigated soil. Environ Pollut 146: 19-24.
  6. Carvalho DC, Brigagao MRPL, Santos MH, Paula FBA, Giusti-Paiva A, et al. (2011) Organic and Conventional Coffea arabica L.: A Comparative Study of the Chemical Composition and Physiological, Biochemical and Toxicological Effects in Wistar Rats. Plant Food Hum Nut 66: 114-121.
  7. Gordillo-Delgado F, Marín E, Cortéz-Ernandez DM, Mejía-Morales C, García-Salcedo AJ (2012) Discrimination of organic coffee via Fourier transform infrared–photoacoustic spectroscopy. J Sci Food Agric
  8. Martín MJ, Pablos F, Gonzáles AG (1998) Characterization of green coffee varieties according to their metal content. Anal Chim Acta 358: 177-183.
  9. Martín MJ, Pablos F, Gonzáles AG (1999) Characterization of arabica and robusta roasted coffee varieties and mixture resolution according to their metal content. Food Chem 66: 365-370.
  10. Amorim Filho V, Polito WL, Gomes Neto JA (2007) Comparative studies of the sample decomposition of green and roasted coffee for determination of nutrients and data exploratory analysis. J Braz Chem Soc 18: 47-53.
  11. Belay A, Ture K, Redi M, Asfaw A. (2008) Measurement of caffeine in coffee beans with UV/vis spectrometer. Food Chem 108: 310-315.
  12. Celik T, Iyisoy A, Amasyali B (2010) The effects of coffee intake on coronary heart disease. Int J Cardiol 144: 118.
  13. van Dam RM, Hu FB (2005) Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. JAMA 294: 97-104.
  14. Ascherio A, Weisskopf MG, O'Reilly EJ, McCullough ML, Calle EE, et al. (2004) Coffee consumption, gender, and Parkinson's disease mortality in the cancer prevention study II cohort: the modifying effects of estrogen. Am J Epidemiol 160: 977-984.
  15. Maia L, de Mendonça A (2002) Does caffeine intake protect from Alzheimer's disease? .Eur J Neurol 9: 377-382.
  16. Conney AH, Zhou S, Lee MJ, Xie JG, Yang CS, et al. (2007) Stimulatory effect of oral administration of tea, coffee or caffeine on UVB-induced apoptosis in the epidermis of SKH-1 mice. Commons below Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 224: 209-213.
  17. Mastinu A, Pira M, Pinna GA, Pisu C, Casu MA, et al. (2013) NESS06SM reduces body weight with an improved profile relative to SR141716A. Pharmacol Res 74: 94-108.
  18. Mastinu A, Pira M, Pani L, Pinna GA, Lazzari P (2012) NESS038C6, a novel selective CB1 antagonist agent with anti-obesity activity and improved molecular profile. Behav Brain Res 234: 192-204.
  19. Illy E, Pizano SD (2004) New research on coffee and health. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Coffee and Health 40th Anniversary meeting of the ICO. Commodities Press, Chinchiná, aganyi D.
  20. Madlala SP (2000) Kinetics of coffee infusion: a comparative study on the extraction kinetics of mineral ions and caffeine from several types of medium roasted coffees. J Sci Food Agric 80: 85-90.
  21. Takenaka M, Sato N, Asakawa H, Wen X, Murata M et al. (2005) Characterization of a metal-chelating substance in coffee. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69: 26-30.
  22. Powell JJ, Jugdaohsingh R, Thompson RP (1999) The regulation of mineral absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. Proc Nutr Soc 58: 147-153.
  23. Fong LY, Li JX, Farber JL, Magee PN (1996) Cell proliferation and esophageal carcinogenesis in the zinc-deficient rat. Carcinogenesis 17: 1841-1848.
  24. Lund EK, Wharf SG, Fairweather-Tait SJ, Johnson IT (1998) Increases in the concentrations of available iron in response to dietary iron supplementation are associated with changes in crypt cell proliferation in rat large intestine. J Nutr 128: 175-179.
  25. Nelson RL (2001) Iron and colorectal cancer risk: human studies. Nutr Rev 59: 140-148.
  26. Zhang Y, Li B, Chen C, Gao Z (2009) Hepatic distribution of iron, copper, zinc and cadmium-containing proteins in normal and iron overload mice. Biometals 22: 251-259.
  27. Nam H1, Knutson MD (2012) Effect of dietary iron deficiency and overload on the expression of ZIP metal-ion transporters in rat liver. Biometals 25: 115-124.
  28. Zenebon O, Pascuet NS, Tiglea P (2008) Métodos físico-químicos para análise de alimentos. Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, 1020p.
  29. AOAC (2000) Official methods of analysis of the AOAC International, (17th ed) Maryland.
  30. AMC (1987) Analytical Methods Committee. Recommendation for definition, estimation and use of the detection limit. Analyst 112: 199-204.
  31. NIST (2011) National Institute of Standard and Technology, NIST, Gaithersburg.
  32. ANVISA (2011) Normas técnicas especiais. National Agency of Sanitary Vigilance, Brazil.
  33. Allen SE, Terman GL (1966) Response of maize and sudangrass to zinc in granular micronutrients. In: Intl Soc Soil Sci. Transactions. Aberdeen 255-266.
  34. Bell LN, Wetzel CR, Grand AN (1996) Caffeine content in coffee as influenced by grinding and brewing techniques. Food Res Int 29: 785-789.
  35. Ratnayake WM, Hollywood R, O'Grady E, Stavric B (1993) Lipid content and composition of coffee brews prepared by different methods. Food Chem Toxicol 31: 263-269.
  36. Boonamnuayvitaya V, Chaiya C, Tanthanpanichakoon W (2004) the preparation and characterization of activated carbon from coffee residue. J Chem Eng Japan 37: 1504–1512.
  37. Kononova ON, Kholmogorov AG, Lukianov AN, Kachin SV, Pashkov GL et al. (2001) Sorption of Zn(II), Cu(II), Fe(III) on carbon adsorbents from manganese sulfate solutions. Carbon 39: 383-387.
  38. Engin MS, Uyanik A, Cay S, Icbudak H. (2010) Effect of the adsorptive character of filter papers on the concentrations determined in studies involving heavy metal ions. Adsor Sci Tec 28: 837-846.
  39. WHO (2011) World Health Organization. Codex Alimentarius Commision Food Agric Org Unit Nat, Tanzania.
  40. Dupas C, Marsset Baglieri A, Ordonaud C, Tomé D, Maillard MN (2006) Chlorogenic acid is poorly absorbed, independently of the food matrix: A Caco-2 cells and rat chronic absorption study. Mol Nutr Food Res 50: 1053-1060.
  41. Duarte GS, Farah A (2011) Effect of simultaneous consumption of milk and coffee on chlorogenic acids' bioavailability in humans. J Agric Food Chem 59: 7925-7931.
  42. Kawanishi S, Yamamoto K (1991) Mechanism of site-specific DNA damage induced by methylhydrazines in the presence of copper(II) or manganese(III). Biochemistry 30: 3069-3075.
  43. Ammerman CB, Baker DH, Lewis AJ (1995) Bioavailability of Nutrients for Animals: Amino acids, Minerals, and Vitamins. Academic Press, New York.
  44. Silva-Oliveira EM, Fernandes PA, Moraes-Santos T (2010) Effect of coffee on chemical hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Nutr Cancer 62: 336-342.
  45. Van Campen DR, Glahn RP (1999) Micronutrient bioavailability techniques: Accuracy, problems and limitations. Field Crop Res 60: 93-113.
  46. Castro JY, Santos EC, Santos WPC, Costa LM, Nobrega JA et al. (2009) A critical evaluation of digestion procedures for samples using diluted nitric acid in closed vessels for inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Talanta 78: 1378-1382.
  47. Jorhem L, Engman J (2000) Determination of lead, cadmium, zinc, copper, and iron in foods by atomic absorption spectrometry after microwave digestion: NMKL Collaborative Study. J AOAC Int 83: 1189-1203.
Citation: Carvalho DC, Picheli FP, Luccas PO, Magalhaes CS, Azevedo L (2014) Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Differences in the Content of Minerals and Studies in Healthy and Induced Cancer Rats. J Nutr Food Sci 4:313.

Copyright: © 2014 Carvalho DC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top