GET THE APP

Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Different Variet
Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9600

Commentary - (2015) Volume 5, Issue 5

Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Different Varieties of Piper Leaf Extracts (Piper Betle L.)

Rintu D1, Shinjini M1, Kaustab M1#, Pramathadhip P1, Umesh PS2 and Banerjee ER1*
1Immunology and Regenerative Medicine Research Laboratory, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India, E-mail: enarb1@gmail.com
2Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032, India, E-mail: enarb1@gmail.com
#Contributed equally to this work
*Corresponding Author: Banerjee ER, Immunology and Regenerative Medicine Research Laboratory, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal, India, Fax: 91-33-24614849

Abstract

Piper betle L. (locally known as Paan) is a widely distributed plant in the tropical and subtropical regions, its leaves being largely consumed as a masticator and mouth freshener. It is valued as a mild stimulant and also has its use in Ayurvedic medicine.
The present study investigates on the free radical scavenging potential as well as total phenolic and aflavanoid contents of methanolic extract of 9 different varieties of Piper betle leaves (A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H&I). These extracts from diverse localities and varying on treatment, maturation at plucking etc. were used to evaluate antioxidant and antiinflammatory activities. The antioxidant potential of all 9 varieties of methanolic leaf extracts were evaluated by six methods: 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity, superoxide radical O2-scavenging activity by the riboflavin-light-nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) system, Lipid peroxidation assay was done by a modified thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) assay and Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging activity . Total phenolic and total flavonoid content also determined by standard protocol. Anti-inflammatory effect of the extract evaluated on LPS induced RAW 264.7 cell line in dose dependent manner. RP-HPLC analyses of 9 varieties of methanolic crude extract, was done and picks were monitored at 254 nm. All of the nine extracts demonstrated highest antioxidant activities at concentration of 1 mg/ml. Among the nine varieties, five (C,E,F,G and I) demonstrated anti-inflammatory activity, one(H) is proinflammatory and three varieties of P.betle leaf (A,B and D) didn’t show significant antiinflammatory activity. the F variety was most effective at a concentration of 250 μg/ml to retained cell viability 99%, very close to control and positive control (Dexamethasone) but H variety of P.betle leaf extract showed proinflammatory activity and cell viability decreased by 29% than control. The results of the experiments suggest that selected variety of P.betle may be used as natural antioxidant as well as an alternative or supplementary herbal remedy for the treatment of inflammatory disease. Thus, the present study warrants further investigation involving components of P.betle for possible development of new class of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Introduction

Inflammation is part of the complex biological response of vascular tissues to harmful stimuli, like pathogens, damaged cells and irritants. It is a mechanism of innate immunity, and is characterized by pain, heat, redness, swelling and loss of function.

Betel vine (Piper betle L.), commonly called paan, and is the leaf of an evergreen, perennial vine of the piperaceae family. Betel leaves are consumed after heavy meals as a digestive stimulant and mouth freshener. Paan is said to have a number of medicinal properties, including anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activities.

Betel (Piper betle) belongs to the genus Piper of the family Piperaceae. The plant originated in central and eastern peninsular Malaysia, where it is locally called sirih [1,2]. It is distributed throughout east Africa and the tropical regions of Asia. It is a commercial crop that is widely cultivated in many parts of India and Sri Lanka [3]. The use of betel leaf can be traced as far back as two thousand years [4]. Fresh leaves are chewed with betel nut, Areca catechu (Arecaceae), and other adjuvants (betel quid) in most parts of India and the habit of chewing betel is so widely prevalent that it ranks next to consumption of alcohol, coffee and smoking [5,6]. Due to their strong pungent aromatic flavour, betel leaves are used as a masticatory in Asia. Its common names are betel (in English), paan (in Indian), phlu (in Thai) and sirih (in Bahasa Indonesian) [7]. Betel leaves are reported to contain an aromatic oil [8], minerals [9], glycosides [10], enzymes, vitamins, essential amino acids [11] and tannins [12].

It has been reported that betel leaf has a wide spectrum of therapeutic properties. The extract of betel leaves possesses antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, antiplaque, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory and antibacterial bioactivities [13-18]. Generally plants that have significant therapeutic properties have been found to be rich in phenolics, with high antioxidant properties [19]. This correlation has been confirmed with the antioxidant activity being detected in the extract of betel leaf [20]. The consumption of antioxidant-rich foods helps neutralize the free radicals in the body, thus preventing or delaying the oxidative damage of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids [21]. It has been shown that the antioxidants could reduce mortality rate of cardiovascular disease [22,23], and protect against cancer and other chronic diseases [24]. The aqueous extract of the inflorescence of Piper betle extract was effective in scavenging H2O2, superoxide radical and hydroxyl radical [25,26]. The extract also prevented hydroxyl radical-induced DNA strand breaks in the PUC18 plasmid [26]. Recently, Manigauha et al, [27] observed that methanolic extracts of the betel leaves possess reducing power, DPPH radical, superoxide anion scavenging and deoxyribose degradation activities [27,28]. Studies have also shown that the hydroalcoholic extract of the betel leaf possesses nitrogen oxide scavenging effect in vitro [26,28].

The betel leaf has long been used as a household remedy for the inflammation of the oral cavity [29]. Ethanolic extracts of betel leaf has been reported to possess anti- inflammatory activities at non- toxic concentrations, in the complete Freund’s adjuvant-induced model of arthritis in rats. Eugenol, one of the principal constituents of betel leaf, has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory effects in various animal models of studies with various inflammogens [30]. Betel leaf constituents, eugenol, hydroxychavicol and alpha-tocopherol,have also been shown to enhance the levels of GSH in mouse skin and liver [31,32].

Different species of betel leaves, for instance, from female (Bengaluru local) type, male (Madras) type and Meetha (sweet) type have been analysed for their anti-oxidant activity by FRAP (Ferric Reducing Anti-Oxidant Potential) Assay [1], their radical scavenging activity by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) Assay [1], their anticancer activity by inhibiting proliferation of cells [2], their apoptosisinducing activity by inhibiting proliferation of cells and Sub G1 flow cytometry [2], and their cryoprotective actuighngnivity towards human fibroblast cells by MTT Assay [3]. The total phenol content and the flavonoid content of the betel leaves have been estimated, using Folin- Ciocalteau method and NaNO2-AlCl3-NaOH respectively. Two of the constituent phenolic compounds have been identified as chevibetol and allyl pyrocatechol [4].

The anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of betel leaves have been attributed to various components of the leaves. Leaves with higher phenol and flavonoid content have been found to have higher anti-oxidant, radical scavenging and anti-cancer activities [1,2]. Quinic acid present in the betel quid may also play a role in health protection. [6].

Hydroxychavicol (HC) is a novel component of betel, which has been found to inhibit platelet aggregation. HC is a potent COX- 1/COX-2 inhibitor, ROS scavenger and inhibits platelet calcium signalling. HC could be used as a therapeutic agent for cardiovascular diseases through its anti-inflammatory effects, without any effect on haemostatic functions [7].

The anti-ulcerogenic activity has also been attributed to the high flavonoid content of betel leaves. It has been seen that betel extracts have the ability to heal gastric ulcers [8] and peptic ulcers [9].

The ethanolic extract of betel has been tested for radioprotective activity, and it has been found that it can prevent DNA-strand breaks induced by radiation. This property has been attributed to its radicalscavenging and lympho-proliferative activities [4].

The aim of our study was to first detect potential anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of 9 varieties of Piper betle leaf extracts which are traditionally known as anti-geriatric compounds. High content of various phenolic and non-phenolic compounds and other uncharacterized moieties may contribute to its use, not only as a highly nutritive, edible plant part, but also as a nutraceutical substance, to be used prophylacticallyas well as therapeutically in oxidative inflammatory diseases.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

Chemicals, such as ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), butanol, ammonium molybdate, and sodium dodecyl sulphate, benzoic acid, sodium phosphate, and DMSO were purchased from E. Merck (India) Limited. 1,1 Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), malondialdehyde, potassium ferricy anite, thiobarbituric acid (TBA) were procured from Sigma, USA. N-butanol, ferrous sulphate, ferric chloride, Folins reagent, Riboflavin, naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride (NED), and sulphanilamide in phosphoric acid, sodium bicarbonate, sodium hydroxide, and potassium hydroxide were purchased from Sisco Research Laboratories PVT Ltd India. Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), MTT reagent [(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide], and DMEM media were purchased from Himedia, India. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Gibco. DCFH-DA and DHR 123 were purchased from Invitrogen. All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Preparation of plant extract

Fresh leaves were washed under distilled water and shade dried for 7 days and powdered. Then extraction was carried out by slightly modified method of Swati Dhote et al. [5]. Briefly, powered leaves were extracted with 80% methanol (1 g: 20 ml) with the help of cold maceration, at room temperature for about 24 hrs, shaking frequently. The process of extraction was repeated for three times. The solution was filtered using Whatman’s filter paper no1 and the solvent, allowed to evaporate completely to obtain the extract. The extract was stored in sterile glass vials at 4°C until use.

DPPH radical-scavenging activity

The antioxidant activity of the crude methanolic P.betle extracts was evaluated against 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radicals [33]. Various concentration of the methanolic extract was added to a 0.004% methanolic solution of DPPH on a 96 well ELISA plate. After 30 min incubation, Absorbance was determined at 517 nm and the percent inhibition activity was calculated.

Assay of superoxide radical O2 -scavenging activity

Riboflavin-light-nitrobluetetrazolium (NBT) system [34] was used to determine the superoxide dismutase activity of the extract according to Martinez et al. [35]. Each 0.1 ml of reaction mixture contained 13 mM methionine, 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 100 μM EDTA, 2 μM riboflavin, NBT (75 μM) and various doses of sample solution. The production of blue formazan was followed by monitoring the increase in absorbance at 560 nm after 15 min of illumination from a fluorescent lamp.

Lipid peroxidation assay

Egg yolk homogenates as lipid-rich media [36] was used as lipid peroxide which was measured by modified thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) assay [36]. MDA which was produced by lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids by FeSO4, reacts with two molecules of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and pinkish red chromogen with an absorbance maximum at 532 nm, was measured using a 96 well ELISA plate reader. Percentage of inhibition of lipid peroxidation was calculated at various concentration of the crude methanolic P.betle extract [37].

Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging activity

Spontaneous decomposition of sodium nitroprusside (20 mM) in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) generates nitric oxide which reacts with oxygen molecules to produce nitrite ions. Griess reaction was used to measure Nitrite ions. Slight modified method of Shirwaikar et al. [38] was used to determine the nitric oxide scavenging activity of the extracts 0.2 ml of sodium nitroprusside (20 mM) in PBS (pH 7.4) and 1.8 ml of PBS solution was added and incubated at 37°C for 3 h. 1 ml of different concentration of extract was taken and diluted with 1 ml of Griess reagent [1% sulfanilamide, 2% H3PO4 and 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine]. Similarly a blank was prepared containing the equivalent amount of reagents (only the sodium nitroprusside and PBS), but without the extract. The absorbance of these solutions was recorded at 540 nm against the corresponding blank solution. Ascorbic acid (100 μg/ml) was used as the reference. The percentage inhibition of nitric oxide was calculated as follows:

The NO scavenging activity(%) of methanolic extract of P.betle leaf =[(Ab-At)-Ab] X 100, where Ab is the absorbance of the blank and At is the absorbance in the presence of P.betle leaf extract or positive control.

Determination of total flavonoid content

Aluminium chloride (AlCl3) was used to determine total flavonoid content of the extras Fisetin was used as a standard 0.1 ml methanolic extracts were added to 0.3 ml distilled water, followed by 0.03 ml, NaNO2 (5 %) and after 5 min 0.03 ml AlCl3 (10%) was added. After further 5 min, the reaction mixture was treated with 0.2 ml of 1 mM NaOH. Finally, the reaction mixture was diluted to 1 ml with water and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm. Fisetin was used as positive control.

Determination of total phenolic content

Folin-Ciocalteau reagent was used to determine total phenolic content of the P.betle leaf extract [39]. The reaction mixture contained 200 μl of diluted extract, 800 μl of freshly prepared diluted Folin Ciocalteau reagent and 2 ml of 7.5 % sodium carbonate. The final mixture was diluted to 7 ml with deionized water. Mixtures were kept in dark at ambient conditions for 2 h to complete the reaction. The absorbance was recorded at 765 nm. Gallic acid was used as standard and the results were expressed as mg Gallic acid (GAE)/10 g of the extract.

Cell culture

HEK 293 cell line and RAW 267.4 murine macrophage cell line was obtained from NCCS, Pune, India. The cells were grown in DMEM medium containing 5% inactivated fetal bovine serum, streptomycin (20 μg/mL) ,penicillin (100 U/mL), and kept at 37°C in T-25 tissue culture flasks at CO2 incubator. Cell was grown to confluence in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Cell viability using MTT assay

Cytotoxicity of betel leaf extract was measured according to Das et al. [40-42] by seeding , 5 × 104 cells/well in a 96-well plate and incubated for 24 h with different concentrations of the betel leaf extract . Each well was filled with 100 μL of medium and 10 μL of a tetrazolium salt, MTT after washing the cell properly. The plate was incubated for various time periods and then absorbance was measured at 540. The percentage of viable cells of control (without extract) considered as 100%. The assay was performed in triplicate twice.

HPLC analysis of the P.betle extracts:

Crude methanolic extract of P.betle leaf was filtered by 0.22 μm syringe filter (Milipore, Germany) and 100 μl of filtered was administered for HPLC analysis. The HPLC analysis was carried out using Waters 2695 System Controller coupled with 2487 dual absorbance detector and Waters 515 pump reversed-phase C18 columns was used as stationary phase. Acetonitrile/Water (1:1, flow rate 0.5 mL/min) was used as and peaks were detected at 254 nm [41].

Results

IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) is a quantitative measure of how much of a drug is required to inhibit a biological process or its component by half. Lower the IC50, the more efficient is the drug.

DPPH radical scavenging activity gives an idea of the anti- oxidant activity of the compound, and is expressed as the concentration of sample needed for 50% reduction of DPPH colour intensity. IC50 of lipid peroxidation assay, NO assay and superoxide radical assay are the concentrations needed to prevent lipid peroxidation, NO production and superoxide production, respectively, by 50%.

The lowest IC50 values are of varieties C and A, for DPPH radical scavenging activity, which are found to be close (1.02 fold higher and 1.09 fold lower, respectively) to the IC50 of ascorbic acid, a standard anti- oxidant, whereas that of variety D is very high (7.30 fold). The IC50 of varieties D, G and H are lower (1.13 fold, 1.16 fold and 1.15 fold respectively) than ascorbic acid, for lipid peroxidation assay. The NO scavenging activity of variety D is lowest among all the compounds (8.45 μg/ml), but it is 2.16 fold higher than ascorbic acid. Superoxide radical scavenging activity of varieties H and G are highest (IC50 0.27 and 0.77, respectively), which are 11.56 and 4.05 folds lower than ascorbic acid.

Inhibition of DPPH radical, or DPPH radical scavenging activity, is seen in all 9 varieties of betel leaves, at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Maximum inhibition is seen in variety C (81.03%), whereas minimum inhibition is seen in variety D (10%). The inhibitory activity of the compounds decrease in the order C>A>B>F>G>I>E>H>D.

The ability to prevent lipid peroxidation is seen in all 9 varieties of betel leaves, at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Maximum inhibition is seen in variety H (77.5 %), whereas minimum inhibition is seen in variety C (22.2 %). The inhibitory activity of the compounds decrease in the order H>G>F>E>D>I>A>B>C.

Nitric oxide scavenging activity is seen in all 9 varieties of betel leaves, at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Maximum inhibition is seen in variety D (41.8%), whereas minimum inhibition is seen in variety G (18.7%). The inhibitory activity of the compounds decrease in the order D>C>A>E>I>F>B>H>G.

Total phenol content of the P.betle leaves was assessed using the Folin-Ciocalteau method, using gallic acid as a standard. Results are expressed as mg gallic acid per 10 gms of extract. It is seen that variety A has the highest phenolic content (1.12 mg GAE/10 gm extract), whereas variety E has the lowest (0.76 mg GAE/10 gm extract). The phenol content of the samples decrease in the order A>B>C>H>I>D>G>F>E.

Total flavonoid content of the P.betle leaves was assessed using the aluminium chloride (AlCl3) method, using fisetin as a standard. Results are expressed as mg fisetin per gm of extract. It is seen that variety B has the highest phenolic content (499.15 mg fisetin/gm extract), whereas variety D has the lowest (46.01 mg fisetin/gm extract). The flavonoid content of the samples decrease in the order B>F>H>E>A>C>I>G>D.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. However, the viability of cells treated with sample A has not increased, but decreased from LPS. The decrease is seen at all the concentrations, with the maximum decrease at 10 μg/ml. This shows that sample A is not very effective in combating the inflammation caused by LPS.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. With addition of extract B, the viability has increased 1.12 fold with 250 μg/ml, and has increased very slightly with 100 μg/ml. However, the viability of cells has decreased with 50 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml. This shows that sample B has an anti-inflammaotyr effect only at high concentrations.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. With sample C, the viability has increased 1.36 fold with 250 μg/ml, and has increased very slightly with 100 μg/ml. However, the viability of cells has decreased with 50 μg/ml. This shows that sample C has an antiinflammatory effect at higher concentrations.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. With addition of sample D, the viability has increased 1.10 fold with 250 μg/ ml.It has increased very slightly with 100 μg/ml (1.01 fold) and with 50 μg/ml (1.01 fold). However, the viability of cells has decreased with 10 μg/ml (1.51 fold). This indicates that sample D has an antiinflammatory effect at comparatively high concentrations, since the viability does not increase till 250 μg/ml.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. With treatment with sample E, the viability has increased 1.10 fold with 250 μg/ml, 1.11 fold with 100 μg/ml, 1.29 fold with 50 μg/ml and 1.42 fold with 10 μg/ml. This indicates that sample E has an anti-inflammatory effect at a concentration as low as 10 μg/ml. It is effective even at high concentrations, without being detrimental.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. The viability has increased 1.52 fold with 250 μg/ml, 1.36 fold with 100 μg/ml, and 1.33 fold with 50 μg/ml, with sample F, but has decreased 1.11 fold with 10 μg/ml. This indicates that sample F has an antiinflammatory effect at concentrationsof 50 μg/ml and above, but not at 10 μg/ml.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. With addition of sample G, the viability has increased 1.21 fold with 100 μg/ml, 1.35 fold with 50 μg/ml, and 1.14 fold with 10 μg/ml, but has decreased 1.03 fold with 250 μg/ml. This indicates that sample G has an anti-inflammatory effect at lower concentrations, but may be toxic at higher concentrations.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. It is seen that with compound H, the viability has not increased even at low concentrations, indicating that sample H has a pro-inflammatory activity, rather than anti- inflammatory activity.

Cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells was assessed using MTT assay. Viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%, and the viabilities of cells treated with extracts were calculated accordingly. Dexamethasone (dexa) was taken as positive control, and cells treated with only LPS as negative control. With LPS treatment, there is a 1.54 fold decrease in viability, which is restored by dexa treatment. With treatment with sample I, the viability has increased 1.35 fold with 250 μg/ml, 1.26 fold with 100 μg/ml, 1.16 fold with 50 μg/ml and 1.10 fold with 10 μg/ml. This indicates that sample I has an antiinflammatory effect at concentrations as low as 10 μg/ml, and even at high concentrations without being toxic to the cells.

Discussion

Natural products are in great demand owing to their extensive biological properties and bioactive components which have proved to be useful against a large number of diseases. It has been proved that present extracts of Piper betleleaves show a wide array of activities like anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and also pro-inflammatory.

Various reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be formed in cells by transition metal {especially Fe (II)} mediated reactions along with oxygen metabolism [42], and radiation exposure [43], leading to deleterious effects on membrane lipids and DNA. For the present work, the antioxidant activity of the methanolic extracts of nine varieties of P. betle leaves were screened by the DPPH radical scavenging and reducing power assays. Antioxidants, on interaction with DPPH, either transfer an electron or hydrogen atom to DPPH, thus neutralising its free radical character [44,45]. The colour changes from purple to yellow and its absorbance at wavelength 517 decreases. Methanolic extract of P. betle leaf extract quenched DPPH free radical (Table 1). DPPH assay shows that, in this system, the radical-scavenging activities of the various Piper leaf extracts are in this order: C>A>B>F>G>I>E>H>D (Table 1). Methanolic extract of C variety P.betle leaf exhibited the highest antioxidant activity by strongly inhibiting 50% of DPPH radicals at a lower concentration (4.38 μg/ml) where ascorbic acid showed 50% inhibition at 4.78 μg/ml (Figure 1). Among 9 varieties of P.betle leaf, D variety was very less active in scavenging free radicals. IC50 value of D variety of P.betle leaf was 34.9 μg/ml (Figure 1).

Varieties Of P.betle Leaves Concentration(μg/ml) % Of Inhibition ± SD, n=3  Regression Equation
A 10 8.83 ± 1.322  y=13.42x-15.62
r2=0.602
50 12.87 ± 0.000
100 9.87 ± 1.027
250 18.57 ± 0.740
1000 73.11 ± 0.848
B 10 2.59 ± 0.385  y=10.83x-16.34,
r2=0.625
50 6.49 ± 0.555
100 6.23 ± 0.623
250 10.90 ± 0.286
1000 54.54 ± 1.210
C 10 8.31 ± 0.734  y=16.11x-20.53
r2=0.699
50 8.96 ± 1.314
100 16.10 ± 0.787
250 24.67 ± 1.438
1000 81.03 ± 0.634
D 10 4.54 ± 0.287  y=1.352x+2.824,
r2=0.972
50 5.32 ± 0.522
100 6.62 ± 1.510
250 7.92 ± 0.156
1000 10.00 ± 0.257
E 10 3.76 ± 0.244  y=4.89x-3.654,
r2=0.864
50 5.97 ± 0.124
100 7.40 ± 0.249
250 13.63 ± 0.216
1000 24.41 ± 0.616
F 10 9.48 ± 0.990  y=8.985x-8.569,
r2=0.560
50 8.44 ± 0.620
100 8.96 ± 1.070
250 12.85 ± 0.739
1000 52.20 ± 0.662
G 10 0  y=9.817x-16.44,
r2=0.778
50 2.46 ± 0.353
100 4.67 ± 0.317
250 15.19 ± 1.039
1000 42.72 ± 0.714
H 10 5.06 ± 0.283  y=3.519x-0.145,
r2=0.743
50 7.14 ± 0.388
100 8.96 ± 0.808
250 9.35 ± 0.560
1000 21.55 ± 0.670
I 10 4.93 ± 0.194  y=6.61x-4.978,
r2=0.823
50 7.53 ± 0.400
100 12.46 ± 0.389
250 15.19 ± 0.883
1000 34.15 ± 0.845

Table 1: DPPH Scavenging Activities of P.betle leaf.

nutrition-food-sciences-lipid-peroxidation

Figure 1: IC50values were calculated from these regression equations. IC50 values of DPPH radical scavenging activity lipid peroxidation, NO radical scavenging activities and superoxide radical scavenging activity of nine different varieties of P.betle leaves (A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H & I) were compared with the IC50 value of Ascorbic Acid in each system to assess the antioxidant property of P.betle leaves.

All of the extracts demonstrated highest inhibition of lipid peroxidation at concentration of 1mg/ml (Table 2). The percentage of lipid peroxidation inhibition, IC50 values (concentration of sample required to scavenge 50% free radical or to prevent lipid peroxidation by 50%) was calculated from regression equations. IC50 values of the nine varieties of P. betle leaves were compared with the IC50 value of ASA in each system to assess the antioxidant property of P. betle leaves (Figure 1). IC50 value is inversely related to the activity. The percentage of lipid peroxide inhibition can be described in the following order: G>H> D>E>F>I>A>C>B. Among the nine varieties of betle leaf extract, G,H, D and E varieties showed more inhibition of lipid peroxidation than ascorbic acid. G variety of betle leaf has the highest activity which was about 1.16 times more than that of ASA.IC50 value of lipid peroxidation of F variety P.betle leaf extract was same as ASA, i.e. 5.57 μg/ml (Figure 1). But A,B,C& I varieties of P.betle leaf extract were less effective than ASA in inhibiting lipid peroxidation. The results suggest that consumption of G,H,D, and E varieties of P. betle leaf may afford a cytoprotective effect.

Varieties Of P.betleLeaves Concentration (μg/ml) % Of Inhibition ± SD, n=3  Regression Equation
A 10 6.4 ± 0.883 y=7.01x+(-3.73)
r²=0.870
50 9.1 ± 1.620
100 10.7 ± 0.679
250 28.6 ± 0.861
1000 31.7 ± 0.399
B 10 4.7 ± 0.204 y=4.6x+(-0.08)
r²=0.982
50 9.3 ± 0.571
100 13.9 ± 0.352
250 16.7 ± 0.183
1000 24.0 ± 0.667
C 10 1.2 ± 0.174 y=5.43x+(-4.23)
r²=0.976
50 5.2 ± 0.380
100 14.2 ± 0.620
250 17.5 ± 0.432
1000 22.2 ± 0.485
D 10 11.6 ± 0.338 y=10.91x+(-3.93)
r²=0.873
50 18.0 ± 0.545
100 22.9 ± 0.996
250 32.7 ± 0.797
1000 58.8 ± 2.900
E 10 10.7 ± 0.892 y=10.5x+(-6.8)
r²=0.643
50 15.8 ± 2.540
100 16.1 ± 0.108
250 19.6 ± 1.960
1000 61.3 ± 0.120
F 10 1.2 ± 0.484 y=13.19x+(-23.29)
r²=.615
50 1.6 ± 0.285
100 6.2 ± 0.470
250 8.9 ± 0.961
1000 63.5 ± 0.350
G 10 8.0 ± 0.136 y=12.99x+(-12.49)
r²=0.716
50 15.8 ± 0.529
100 15.5 ± 0.097
250 24.5 ± 0.338
1000 68.6 ± 0.097
H 10 11.6 ± 1.120 y=13.34x+(-14.84)
r²=0.519
50 11.6 ± 0.240
100 12.0 ± 0.272
250 13.2 ± 0.985
1000 77.5 ± 0.147
I 10 2.4 ± 0.400 y=10.79x+(-14.07)
r²=0.841
50 7.6 ± 0.253
100 9.9 ± 0.588
250 22.9 ± 0.588
1000 48.7 ± 0.596

Table 2: Prevention of lipid peroxidation by P.betle leaf.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a potent pleiotropic mediator in physiological processes and a diffusible free radical too in the pathological conditions. It reacts with superoxide anion and form a potentially cytotoxic molecule, the ‘peroxynitrite (ONOO-)’. Its protonated form, peroxynitrous acid (ONOOH), is a very strong oxidant [46,47] . The main route of damage is the nitration or hydroxyllation of aromatic compounds, particularly tyrosine. Under physiological conditions, peroxynitrite also forms an adduct with carbon dioxide dissolved in body fluid and responsible for oxidative damage of proteins in living systems [48,49]. Methanolic extract of 9 varieties of P. betle leaf were examined for their possible regulatory effect on nitric oxide (NO) levels using sodium nitroprusside as an NO donor in vitro. All of the P. betle leaf extracts demonstrated direct scavenging of NO and exhibited significant activity. The potency of scavenging activity was in the following order: D>C>A>E>I>F>B>H>G (Table 3). IC50 value of the D variety of P. betle leaf extract was 8.45μg/ml, whereas IC50 value of ascorbic acid was 3.92 μg/ml (Figure 1) [50].

Varieties Of P.betleLeaves Concentration (μg/ml) % Of Inhibition ± SD, n=3 Regression Equation
A 10 15.8 ± 0.044 y=3.54x+9.82,
r²=0.748
50 16.3 ± 0.161
100 18.4 ± 0.216
250 20.1 ± 0.194
1000 31.6
B 10 14 y=1.78x+12.62
r²=0.972
50 16.8
100 18.1
250 19.2
1000 21.7
C 10 15.8 ± 0.088 y=4.30x+7.66
r²=0.584
50 16.2 ± 0.095
100 16.4 ± 0.161
250 18.0 ± 0.044
1000 36.4 ± 0.264
D 10 17.1 ± 0.078 y=5.01x+7.65
r²=0.548
50 17.8 ± 0.040
100 18.2 ± 0.066
250 18.5 ± 0.044
1000 41.8 ± 0.529
E 10 16.0 ± 0.060 y=3.18x+9.98
r²=0.570
50 16.3 ± 0.095
100 16.6 ± 0.108
250 17.3 ± 0.078
1000 31.4 ± 0.120
F 10 16.9 y=2.15x+13.13
r²=0.812
50 16.6
100 18.3
250 20.3
1000 25.8
G 10 16.7 y=0.45x+16.69
r²=0.806
50 18
100 18.3
250 18.5
1000 18.7
H 10 18.3 ± 0.044 y=0.55x+17.79
r²=0.978
50 18.8 ± 0.222
100 19.6 ± 0.033
250 20.1 ± 0.197
1000 20.4 ± 0.108
I 10 19.1 ± 0.120 y=2.17x+15.01
r²=0.573
50 19.3 ± 0.040
100 19.6 ± 0.133
250 20.0 ± 0.116
1000 29.6 ± 0.851

Table 2: Prevention of lipid peroxidation by P.betle leaf.

Phenols are the largest group of secondary metabolites of plant. Plant phenolic compounds have various biological effects, including antioxidant (1,49,50,51,52).Plant phenolic compounds are highly effective free radical scavengers and antioxidants. Consequently, the antioxidant activities of plant/herb extracts are often explained by their total phenolic content with good correlation. We also observed similar correlations in the present study [51].

Figure 2 demonstrated the total phenolic content (TPC) of nine varieties of methanolic extracts of P.betle leaf. It was found that the A variety of P.betle leaf extract has the highest TPC, i.e. 1.121 ± 0.019 mg gallic acid/10 gm of P.betle leaf extract [52].

nutrition-food-sciences-gallic-acid

Figure 2: Bar graph showing comparative phenol content of 9 varieties of P.betle leaves. Results expressed as gallic acid equivalent (mg gallic acid/10gm) ± SEM of P. betle leaf extract, in duplicate.

Anti-inflammatory versus pro- inflammatory effect

The effect of methanolic extract of 9 varieties of P.betle leaf on the viability of RAW 264.7 cells was evaluated therapeutically in a dose dependent manner (Figure 3). RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 1μg/ml of E.coli LPS and then various concentrations of methanolic Piper leaf extracts (250 μg/ml, 100 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml) were added into it therapeutically and incubated for 24 h. Sample A did not exhibit any anti-inflammatory effect on LPS induced inflamed Raw 264.7 cells (Figure 4). Sample B (250 μg/ml) showed very less antiinflammatory activity and it retained 72.69% viability, only 7.69% more than LPS induced RAW264.7 cells, which showed 65% viability (Figure 5). 250 μg/ml of sample C showed significant anti-inflammatory effect and it retained 88.4%viability, but the other three concentrations did not show effective viability on LPS treated RAW264.7 cells (Figure 6). Sample D retained 71.79% viability at a concentration of 250 μg/ml, and it is 6.79% more than negative control (Figure 7). In sample E, we found significant anti- inflammatory effect at every concentration and cell viability was retained 91.22%, 71.98 %, 84.01% and 92.09% at 250 μg/ml, 100 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml and 10 μg/m respectively on LPS treated RAW cells. Maximum anti- inflammatory activity was seen at a concentration of 250 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml, which is close to positive control i.e. Dexamethasone (Figure 8). Among the 9 varieties of P.betle leaf, the F variety was most effective concentration of 250 μg/ml and it retained cell viability 99%, very close to control and positive control. 2other concentrations of sample F, 100 μg/ml and 50 μg/ml, also showed significant viability, 88.48% and 86.49% respectively, under same experimental conditions. However, at a concentration of 10 μg/ml, there is no anti-inflammatory activity (Figure 9). Methanolic extract of sample G showed significant anti-inflammatory activity at a concentration of 50 μg/ml with respect to cell viability. At this concentration, it retained cell viability by 88.06 %, which is 23.06 % more than cell viability of negative control, i.e. 65% (Figure 10). 2 other concentrations of this sample, 100 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml, also showed anti-inflammatory activity, and retained cell viability by 78.86% and 73.9% respectively (Figure 10). But at the highest concentration (250 μg/ml), this variety of P.betle leaf showed lowest activity, but the other 7 varieties of P.betle leaf (A,B,C,D,E,F, and I) showed highest activity at concentration of 250 μg/ml. Variety I of P.betle leaf showed antiinflammatory activity at 4 different concentrations. At a concentration of 250 μg/ml, it showed maximum viability of 87.74%, 22.74% more than negative control (Figure 11). Interestingly, sample H showed pro-inflammatory activity, whereas the other 8 varieties of P.betle leaf showed anti- inflammatory activity. Cell viability was retained 36.35%,39.61%,39.13% and 39.35% at concentrations of 250 μg/ml, 100 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml of methanolic extract of sample H respectively,where LPS treated RAW cells showed 65% cell viability (Figure 12).

nutrition-food-sciences-flavonoid-acid

Figure 3: Bar graph showing comparative flavonoid content of 9 varieties of P.betle leaves. Results expressed as fisetin equivalent (mg fisetin/gm) ± SEM of P.betle leaf extract, in duplicate.

nutrition-food-sciences-dexamethasone

Figure 4: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (A) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control, to determine antiinflammatory property P.betle leaf extract of sample A by MTT assay.

nutrition-food-sciences-viability

Figure 5: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (B) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

nutrition-food-sciences-graph

Figure 6: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (C) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

nutrition-food-sciences-positive

Figure 7: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (D) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

nutrition-food-sciences-inflamed

Figure 8: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (E) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

nutrition-food-sciences-Dexa

Figure 9: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (F) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

nutrition-food-sciences-negative

Figure 10: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (G) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

nutrition-food-sciences-dexamethasone

Figure 11: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (H) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

nutrition-food-sciences-induced

Figure 12: Bar graph showing effect of various concentrations of P.betle leaf extract (I) on viability of LPS induced inflamed RAW 264.7 cell line. Viability of Control (untreated) is considered as 100%, +Dexa (Dexamethasone) is used as positive control and +LPS as negative control.

HPLC profile

Figures 13-21 demonstrated the HPLC fingerprint of 9 crude extract of methanolic P. betle leaf. Among 9 varieties, B,D and F varieties of the P.betle leaf extracts showed very sharp and single pick at 254 nm (Figures 14,16 & 18) and F varieties showed highest antiinflammatory activity .But Other six varieties of P. betle leaf extract showed multiple picks. Further analysis like MS, NMR etc. has to be done for identification of the pure bioactive compounds which have potent biological antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities.

nutrition-food-sciences-methanolic

Figure 13: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety A of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample A prepared from methanolic extract of P.betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Three major peaks were identified at 254 nm and their retention times were 5.25, 7.36 and 9.33 min respectively.

nutrition-food-sciences-mobile

Figure 14: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety B of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample B prepared from methanolic extract of P. betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Only one peak was found at 254 nm and its retention time was 6.53 min.

nutrition-food-sciences-mobile

Figure 15: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety C of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample C prepared from methanolic extract of P. betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5ml/min. Six peaks were identified at 254nm and their retention times were 5.21, 6.08, 6.42, 7.01, 7.44 and 7.97 min respectively.

nutrition-food-sciences-negative

Figure 16: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety D of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample D prepared from methanolic extract of P.betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Only one peak was found at 254 nm and its retention time was 6.54 min.

nutrition-food-sciences-gallic-acid

Figure 17: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety E of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample E prepared from methanolic extract of P. betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Only two peaks were found at 254 nm and their retention times were 6.73 and 7.16 min respectively.

nutrition-food-sciences-cancer

Figure 18: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety F of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample F prepared from methanolic extract of P. betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Only one peak was found at 254 nm and its retention time was 3.01 min.

nutrition-food-sciences-triglycerides

Figure 19: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety G of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample G prepared from methanolic extract of P. betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Four peaks were identified at 254 nm and their retention times were 15.04, 16.19, 17.79 and 18.79 min respectively.

nutrition-food-sciences-triglycerides

Figure 20: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety H of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample H prepared from methanolic extract of P. betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Three peaks were identified at 254 nm and their retention times were 6.40, 6.70 and 9.42 min respectively.

nutrition-food-sciences-methanolic

Figure 21: HPLC profile of a methanolic extract of variety I of Piper betle. Chromatogram of crude Sample I prepared from methanolic extract of P. betle L. leaf, on analytical RP-HPLC in isocratic mode using acetonitrile and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Four peaks were identified at 254 nm and their retention times were 13.82, 14.36, 15.28 and 17.66 min respectively.

Conclusion

 

Piper betle L. (locally known as Paan) is a widely distributed plant in the tropical and subtropical regions, its leaves being largely consumed               as a masticator and mouth freshener. It is valued as a mild stimulant             and also has its use in Ayurvedic medicines.

 

The present study investigates on the free radical scavenging potential               as well as total phenolic and aflavanoid contents of methanolic               extract of 9 different varieties of Piper betle leaves (A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H               & I). These extracts from diverse localities and varying on treatment,               maturation at plucking etc. were used to evaluate antioxidant and               anti-inflammatory activities. The antioxidant potential of all 9               varieties of methanolic leaf extracts were evaluated by six methods:               1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging               activity, superoxide radical O2 - scavenging activity by the riboflavinlight-               nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) system, Lipid peroxidation assay               was done by A modified thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS)               assay, Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging activity. By the Griess reaction               and determination of total phenolic content was done by the Folin-               Ciocalteau reagent. Gallic acid was used as standard to determine               total phenolic content. Total flavonoid content was determined using               aluminium chloride (AlCl3) and the results were expressed as mg               Fiseting P. betle leaf extract. P. betle leaves. MTT assay was performed               to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of the extract on RAW 264.7               cell line in dose dependent manner. RP-HPLC analyses of 9 varieties of               methanolic crude extract, was done in isocratic mode using acetonitrile               and water (1:1) as mobile phase and C18 column as stationary phase               and pick were monitored at 254 nm. All of the 9 extracts demonstrated               highest antioxidant activities at concentration of 1mg/ml. C variety               P.betle leaf exhibited the highest DPPH radicals scavenging activity               (IC50-4.38 μg/ml) which was more than Ascorbic acid (IC50-4.78 μg/               ml) where D variety was less effective(IC50 :34.9 μg/ml). G variety of               betle leaf extract was most effective to inhibit peroxidation of lipid,               about 1.16 times more effective than Ascorbic acid. In superoxide and               nitric oxide radical scavenging assays, among 9 varieties, D showed               highest NO nitric oxide radical scavenging activity (IC50 8 μg/ml) and               H variety demonstrated highest superoxide radical O2 - scavenging               (IC50- 0.77 μg/ml) when compared to the reference compounds. . It               was found that B variety showed the highest phenolic content (499.15               mg fisetin/ gm extract), whereas variety D had the lowest (46.01 mg               fisetin/ gm extract). Among the 9 varieties of P. betle leaf, the F variety               was most effective at a concentration of 250 μg/ml and it retained cell               viability 99%, very close to control and positive control but H variety of               P.betle leaf extract showed pro-inflammatory activity and cell viability               decreased by 29% than LPS induced RAW 264.7 cell. The results of               the experiments suggest that selected variety of P. betle may be used as               natural antioxidant as well as an alternative or supplementary herbal               remedy for the treatment of inflammatory disease [53]. This is the               first communication that betel leaves cannot be generalized in terms               of their potential medicinal properties or toxic traits. It is a very fine               environmental issue. The betel leaves used in the study have been               collected from various geographical localities; have different farming               profiles including various environmental traits and anthropogenic               factors that lead to variations in their functional profiles. The details of               the environmental and anthropogenic factors require detailed analyses               and are beyond the scope of this paper. But this is a unique finding and               needs to be brought to the attention of food scientists, drug hunters,               ecologists, economists and social scientists because of the far reaching               consequences of taking on leaf versus another and their long term               health consequences as functional food. While some varieties show               powerful anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, others show               antagonistic functions which are potentially dangerous and long term             use may lead to serious health conditions. These need to be avoided but common people generally believe paan to be of only one variety and             do not consider the micro-nutrients aspects that must be factored in.             Additionally biodiversity conservation also should be a major thrust             area for the conservation /preservation of each variety which are by             no means uniform and farming techniques and human interference             and handling also must be thoroughly studies to understand the             implication of each and every factor contributing to its ultimate             functional phenotype and implications in terms of its transcriptomic             components that in turn influence the metabolomics of the human             being taking them as recreational food. Thus, the present study             warrants further investigation involving components of P. betle for             possible development of new class of anti-inflammatory drugs as well             as focussed biodiversity conservation policies.

 

 

Contribution of Authors

RD has performed all assays, analysed data and drafted this manuscript. SM has analysed data and made significant intellectual contribution to this work. KM had performed some preliminary assays. UPS has mentored all the proteomic analyses pertaining to this project and helped in the acquiring of data and all final analyses. ERB has conceptualized the project, planned all experiments, analysed all data and wrote this manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge University of Calcutta and Center for Research in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology for all infrastructure related funding for setting up the lab, University Grants Commission for providing funds for initiation of viable research projects in the ERB lab, WB DST for paying RD his fellowship, WB DBT for paying KM his fellowship, UGC for paying SM her fellowship (she is a UGC-NET fellow) and Indian Institute of Chemical Biology for providing UPS his infrastructural requirements. We would also like to acknowledge Prof. Bratati De and her fellow for providing the paan extracts. ERB is the PI on all funded intramural and extramural projects that have directly or indirectly funded the research embodied in this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  1. Pin KY, Luqman CA, Abdull RA, Mazura MP, Fadzureena J, et al. (2010) Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Extracts of betel leaves (Piper betle) from solvents with different polarities. JTFS 22: 448-455.
  2. Jaganath IB, Ng Lt. (2000) Piper betle. In Herbs-The Green Pharmacy of Malaysia. Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Kuala Lumpur) pp. 81-83.
  3. Guha P (2006) Betel leaf: the neglected green gold of India. JHE 19: 87-93.
  4. Krishna KS, Geetha VS, Kuruvilla A (2001) Determination of local anesthetic action of betel leaf extract alone and with betel nut using infiltration and surface anesthesia. J Natr Remed 1: 28-32.
  5. Dhote S, Devi PU, Pathak AK, Goswami RB (2007) Studies on anti-genotoxic effect of Piper betle leaves. JNR 7: 247-251.
  6. Norton SA (1998) Betel: consumption and consequences. J Am Acad Dermatol 38: 81-88.
  7. Kumari OS, Rao NB (2015) Phyto Chemical Analysis of Piper Betel Leaf Extract. WJPPS 4: 699-703.
  8. Nigam SS, Purohit RM (1962) Chemical examination of the essential oil of the leaves of Piper betle. Reichstoffe Aromen Koerperpflegemittel 12: 185.
  9. Gopalan C, Rama SBV, Balasubramanian SC (1984) Nutritive value of Indian foods, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Indian Council of Medical Research: New Delhi.
  10. Deshpande SM, Upadhyay RR, Singh RP (1970) Chemical study of Piper betle leaves. Curr Sci 39: 372.
  11. Anonymous (1969) The Wealth of India, A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials and Industrial Products, Vol III, Publication and Information Directorate CSIR: New Delhi.
  12. Morton JF (1992) Widespread tannin intake via stimulants and masticatories, especially guarana, kola nut, betel vine, and accessories. Basic Life Sci 59: 739-765.
  13. Amonkar AJ, Nagabhushan M, D'Souza AV, Bhide SV (1986) Hydroxychavicol: a new phenolic antimutagen from betel leaf. Food Chem Toxicol 24: 1321-1324.
  14. Padma PR, Lalitha VS, Amonkar AJ, Bhide SV (1989) Anticarcinogenic effect of betel leaf extract against tobacco carcinogens. Cancer Lett 45: 195-202.
  15. Arambewela LS, Arawwawala LD, Ratnasooriya WD (2005) Antidiabetic activities of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Piper betle leaves in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 102: 239-245.
  16. Mazura MP, Nuziah H, Rasadah MA, Ling SK (2007) Evaluation of Piper betle on platelet activating factor (PAF) receptor binding activities. MJS 26: 79-83.
  17. Nalina T, Rahim Z (2007) The crude aqueous extract of Piper betle L. and its antibacterial effect towards Streptococcus mutans. AJBB 3: 10-15.
  18. Hajare R, Darvhekar VM, Shewale A, Patil V (2011) Evaluation of antihistaminic activity of piper betel leaf in guinea pig. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 5: 113-117.
  19. Nur SN, Nalina T, Zubaidah HARZ (2013) Antioxidant and cytoprotective activities of Piper betle, Areca catechu, Uncaria gambir and betel quid with and without calcium hydroxide. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 13: 351.
  20. Dasgupta N, De B (2004) Antioxidant activity of Piper betle L. leaf extract in vitro. Food Chem 88: 219-222.
  21. Lim YY, Lim TT, Tee JJ (2007) Antioxidant properties of several tropical fruits: a comparative study. Food Chem 103: 1003-1008.
  22. Devasagayam TP, Tilak JC, Boloor KK, Sane KS, Ghaskadbi SS, et al. (2004) Free radicals and antioxidants in human health: current status and future prospects. J Assoc Physicians India 52: 794-804.
  23. Agoramoorthy G, Chen FA, Venkatesalu V, Kuo DH (2008) Shea PC.Evaluation of antioxidant polyphenols from selected mangrove plants of India. Asian J Chem 20: 1311-1322.
  24. Anani K, Hudson JB, De-Souza C, Akpagana K, Tower GHN, et al. (2000) Investigation of medicinal plants of Togo for antiviral and antimicrobial activities. J Pharm Biol 38: 40-45.
  25. Sengupta R, Banik JK (2013) A Review on Betel Leaf (Pan). IJPSR 4: 4519-4524.
  26. Lei D, Chan CP, Wang YJ, Wang TM, Lin BR, et al. (2003) Antioxidative and antiplatelet effects of aqueous inflorescence Piper betle extract. J Agric Food Chem 51: 2083-2088.
  27. Manigauha A, Ali H, Maheshwari MU (2009) Antioxidant activity of ethanolic extract of Piper betel leaves. J Pharm Res 2: 491-494.
  28. Jagetia GC1, Baliga MS (2004) The evaluation of nitric oxide scavenging activity of certain Indian medicinal plants in vitro: a preliminary study. J Med Food 7: 343-348.
  29. Satyavati GV, Raina MK, Sharma M (1987) Medicinal Plants of India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
  30. Dohi T, Terada H, Anamura S, Okamoto H, Tsujimoto A (1989) The anti-inflammatory effects of phenolic dental medicaments as determined by mouse ear edema assay. Jpn J Pharmacol 49: 535-539.
  31. Azuine MA, Amonkar AJ, Bhide SV (1991) Chemopreventive efficacy of betel leaf extract and its constituents on 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene induced carcinogenesis and their effect on drug detoxification system in mouse skin. Indian J Exp Biol 29: 346-351.
  32. Bhide SV, Zariwala MB, Amonkar AJ, Azuine MA (1991) Chemopreventive efficacy of a betel leaf extract against benzo[a]pyrene-induced forestomach tumors in mice. J Ethnopharmacol 34: 207-213.
  33. Braca A, De Tommasi N, Di Bari L, Pizza C, Politi M, et al. (2001) Antioxidant principles from Bauhinia tarapotensis. J Nat Prod 64: 892-895.
  34. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44: 276-287.
  35. Martinez AC, Marcelo EL, Marco AO, Moacyr M (2001) Differential responses of superoxide dismutase in freezing resistant Solanum curtibolum and freezing sensitive Solanum tuberosum subjected to oxidative and water stress. Plant Science 160: 505-515.
  36. Ruberto G, Baratta MT, Deans SG, Dorman HJ (2000) Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Foeniculum vulgare and Crithmum maritimum essential oils. Planta Med 66: 687-693.
  37. Ohkowa M, Ohisi N, Yagi K (1979) Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissue by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Analytical Biochemistry 95: 351-358.
  38. Shirwaikar A, Shirwaikar A, Rajendran K, Punitha IS (2006) In vitro antioxidant studies on the benzyl tetra isoquinoline alkaloid berberine. Biol Pharm Bull 29: 1906-1910.
  39. Mukherjee K, Paul P, Banerjee ER (2014) Free Radical Scavenging Activities of Date Palm (Phoenix sylvestris) Fruit Extracts. Nat Prod Chem Res 2: 151.
  40. Das R, Mitra S, Mukherjee K, Singh UP, Ray Banerjee E (2015) Anti-Oxiflammatory Profile of Date Extracts (Phoenix sylvestris). BRT 2: 297-317.
  41. Ganguly S, Mula S, Chatftopadhyay S, Chatterjee M (2007) An ethanol extract of Piper betle Linn. mediates its anti-inflammatory activity via down-regulation of nitric oxide. J Pharm Pharmacol 59: 711-718.
  42. Von SC (1987) The Chemical Basis of Radiation Biology; Taylor and Francis: London.
  43. Naik GH, Priyadarsini KI, Satav JG, Banavalikar MM, Sohoni DP, et al. (2003) Comparative antioxidant activity of individual herbal components used in Ayurvedic medicine. Phytochemistry 63: 97-104.
  44. Hanane D, Choukri BM, Meriem B, Meryem S, Meriem G (2013) Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds of the Cladodes of Opuntia ficus indica Mill. From Northwest Algeria. IJMPS 3: 147-158.
  45. Saumya SM, Mahaboob, Basha P (2011) In Vitro Evaluation of Free Radica Scavenging Activities of Panax Ginseng and Lagerstroemia Speciosa: A Comparative Analysis, Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 3: 165-169.
  46. Malinski T (2007) Nitric oxide and nitroxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 11: 207-218.
  47. Szabó C, Ischiropoulos H, Radi R (2007) Peroxynitrite: biochemistry, pathophysiology and development of therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6: 662-680.
  48. Burney S, Niles JC, Dedon PC, Tannenbaum SR (1999) DNA damage in deoxynucleosides and oligonucleotides treated with peroxynitrite. Chem Res Toxicol 12: 513-520.
  49. Durgaprasad M, Amarendra CH, Anusha G (2011) Determination of Antioxidant and Phenolic Compounds in betel plant by high performance liquid chromatography. Intl J Sci Inno Disc 1: 109-114.
  50. Rathee JS, Patro BS, Mula S, Gamre S, Chattopadhyay S (2006) Antioxidant activity of piper betel leaf extract and its constituents. J Agric Food Chem 54: 9046-9054.
  51. Tiara PA, Yunahara F (2013) Total Phenolic, Flavonoids Content and Antioxidant Activity of the Ethanolic Extract of Betle Leaf (Piper betle L.). ICNJ.
  52. Arambewela L, Arawwawala M, Rajapaksa D (2006) Piper betle: A potential natural antioxidant. Intl J of Food Sci and Technol 41: 10-14.
Citation: Rintu D, Shinjini M, Kaustab M, Pramathadhip P, Umesh PS, et al. (2015) Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Different Varieties of Piper Leaf Extracts (Piper Betle L.). J Nutr Food Sci 5:415.

Copyright: © 2015 Rintu D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top