GET THE APP

Use of Soy Lecithin to Improve Nutritional Quality of Poultry Mea
Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9600

Research Article - (2018) Volume 8, Issue 4

Use of Soy Lecithin to Improve Nutritional Quality of Poultry Meats and its Effect on Stability and Sensory Attributes

Kaiwen Mu and David D Kitts*
Food, Nutrition and Health Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Canada
*Corresponding Author: David D Kitts, Food, Nutrition and Health Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2205 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, Tel: 6048225560, Fax: 604-822-5143

Keywords: Soy lecithin; Poultry meats; Oxidative stability

Introduction

The increased recognition of notable health benefits afforded to consumers with higher dietary intakes of polyunsaturated fatty acids, aimed specifically at an optimal 3-5 to 1 ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid [1-6] has generated considerable interest in the functional food industry [7]. Strategies to achieve this goal have included omega-3 fatty acid food formulations that rely on blending of oils which are rich in both fish and vegetable omega-3 fatty acid sources [8,9], use of microencapsulated omega-3 fatty acids [10,11] and feeding of domestic animal livestock with omega-3 PUFA- rich oil sources that will result in a specific alteration in the omega-3 content of the derived food product [12-14]. In this last example, the basis of the research efforts stems from the fact that presently a significant portion of the average North American diet includes food products derived from terrestrial livestock [15] and that North American consumers are less likely to choose diets that contain high amounts of oil fish [16].

Inclusion of essential oils in poultry diets has been successful to fortify the PUFA content [17,18]. Linoleic (C18:2, n-6) and α-LA (C18:3, n-3) are both essential fatty acids found in lecithin co-products derived from this edible oil [19]. The presence of high PUFA content with limited antioxidant capacity can lead to unwanted adverse changes in product quality associated with increased susceptibility to lipid oxidation [20]. Oxidation reactions in foods generally lead to generation of undesirable odors, flavors as well as potential risks to consumer safety, attributed to secondary products, such as malonaldehyde [21-24]. Monitoring lipid oxidation reactions in muscle foods can be achieved using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test for major secondary lipid oxidation products, or alternatively, using sensory evaluation analysis for perceived changes in flavor and odor in cooked meat products [25].

Soy lecithin, along with other sources of lecithin such as corn, rapeseed, sunflower and egg yolk, is rich in PUFA. Feeding soy-lecithin to broiler chickens can alter key events in hepatic gene expression that are linked to changes in lipid metabolism [26]. Antioxidant behavior of lecithin derived from vegetable oil [27], has potential synergistic actions with α-tocopherol to stabilize PUFAs in specific lipid oxidation studies [28-31]. The antioxidant capacity of lecithin could therefore also be considered a secondary added value, important for deriving a functional food from poultry meats that will rely on the retention of the value-added PUFA-nutrient components. For example, lipid oxidation reactions are enhanced in enriched PUFA poultry meats, thus requiring some stabilization at either the stage of diet ingredient formulation or with post-slaughter application of products [20]. Many workers have shown a positive effect of α-tocopherol in reducing the rate of lipid oxidation in poultry meats that enable extended shelf-life [32,33]. Administering the antioxidant to poultry diets produces better results for stabilizing lipids against oxidative processes in meat products, since a greater even distribution of the antioxidant can be obtained compared to adding it directly to the product. The purpose of the present study was to examine the stability and acceptability of omega-3 enriched poultry meat derived from poultry fed soy lecithin. Assessment of stability of both breast and leg meats was done in cooked and cooked-stored samples.

Materials and Methods

Birds and diets

A total of twenty-four hundred (2400), newly-hatched, sexed (1200 males, 1200 females) Hubbard Hi-Y broiler chicks were used in this study. The broiler chickens were fed 4 diets with varying levels of dietary soy lecithin (donated by Archer Daniels Midland Co, Decatur, I.L., U.S.A.) to replace tallow in the diets (e.g. diets were: 0% lecithin, 100% tallow (0L); 25% lecithin, 75% tallow (25L); 50% lecithin, 50% tallow (50L); and 100% lecithin, 0% tallow (100L) (Table 1). Birds were fed a crumbled 22% protein diet from day 0 to day 21 (starter, S), a pelleted 21% protein (grower, G) diet fed from day 21 to day 34, and a pelleted 19% protein finished diet from day 35 until the completion of the trial at day 39 (finish, F). The diets were randomly assigned by @RAND procedure of Quattro Pro (v.5) software (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). The housing of birds and feeding trials were conducted under veterinarian supervision by Drs. Stewart Ritchie and William Cox, at Canadian Poultry Consultants, Ltd., Abbotsford, B.C., Canada. After 39 days, the chickens were killed at a local commercial processor, and the carcasses were cut into breast and leg samples at 4°C, individually wrapped in thin polyethylene films, packed in 3 ml black polyethylene bags, and finally stored at –30C, until analysis began.

Diet Ingredient Ingredient Inclusion (%)
0L 25L 50L 100L
Corn†§ 43.08 43.08 43.08 43.08
Wheat 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
Soybean Meal†§ 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Meat Meal 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50
Salt 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Limestone 0.48 0.505 0.530 0.58
Dicalcium Phosphate 0.43 0.368 0.205 0.18
Alimet 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
Trace Mineral Premix 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
Vitamin Premix 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Coxistac 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Stafac 44 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Lecithin†§ 0.00 0.625 1.250 2.5
Tallow 2.5 1.875 1.250 0.00
Choline Chloride 0.082 0.061 0.041 0.00
Sand 0.00 0.058 0.116 0.232

0L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.
Grower diet; Corn = 47.30; Soybean Meal = 25.00; Lecithin 0L = 0.00, 25L = 0.875, 50L = 1.750, 100L = 3.50.
§Finished diet; Corn = 52.59; Soybean Meal = 19.80; Lecithin 0L = 0.00, 25L = 0.875, 50L = 1.750, 100L = 3.50.

Table 1: Components of experimental broiler diet formulations.

Processing broiler meats

Leg and breast samples from three different birds were thawed for 15 hours at 4°C. treatment and prepared for chemical and sensory analyses after cooking. Both leg and breast samples were steamed until the internal temperature reached 60°C; with further cooking continued for 10 minutes. After steam cooking all meat samples were cooled to 40°C (internal temperature) using room temperature, then cut into one-inch cubes and served immediately to the panelists. Parallel samples were stored for 14 days at 4°C. No sensory experiments were conducted on those particular samples.

Chemical analyses

Total crude lipids were extracted from the cooked breast and leg samples using 2:1 chloroform/methanol (v/v), according to the method of Folch and others [34]. Unsaponifiable fat in the samples was extracted with petroleum ether and phospholipid content was measured using an enzymatic colorimetric test kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Saponifiable fat remaining was analyzed for fatty acids by gas chromatography (Shimadzu Model GC-17A, Mandel Scientific Co., Guelph, Ontario, Canada) according to the method described by Soewono and Kitts [9]. Percentages of different fatty acids present in the leg and breast samples were calculated by the area under each peak in the chromatogram. PUFA n-3 fatty acids were present <0.01% total fatty acids.

MDA was measured using the Thiobarbituric Acid assay, (TBA) procedure of Buege and Aust [35]. TBA values were converted to MDA values (mg MDA/100 g meat) from a standard curve prepared with tetraethoxy propane (MDA standard).

Sensory analysis

Sensory studies were conducted using Descriptive Analytical Testing. Twelve trained male and female panelists in the age group of 20-35 were used in the taste panel. Training provided panelists with terminology to describe the characteristics of the samples and to interpret the scales used in the study. Breast and leg samples were coded with three digit random numbers according to the diet treatment the birds had been fed. The samples were evaluated for different attributes using a 10 inch unstructured line scale anchored at each end. The terminology used to describe aroma were “chicken aroma”, “cardboard” and “oxidized.” The attributes for flavor included “cardboard”, “oxidized” (aftertaste) and “sour.” “First impression tenderness” and “initial juiciness” were used to describe texture. The distance from the left hand anchor on the line scale to the panellists’ mark was used as the score (0 = none, and 10 = intense). Panelists were given free access to distilled water and unsalted crackers during the tasting to help cleanse their palates.

Statistical analysis

The effects of four dietary treatments supplemented with varying proportion of soy lecithin on the fatty acid and TBAR content in broiler chicken leg and breast muscle meats were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences among the treatment mean values were determined using Tukey’ test (MINITAB Version 17- Minitab Inc. State College, PA, USA). In all cases, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Diets

Table 1 shows the components of the experimental, starter (S), growing (G) and finishing (F) broiler diets, formulated to contain a range of dietary lecithin to tallow proportions that resulted in final lecithin inclusions of 0-100%. Small changes in the diet compositions were made to meet requirements of birds at each level of development, with Table 2 summarizing the energy density and nutrient composition of S, G, and F diets. Small increment increases in metabolizable energy for G and F diets complemented similar small increases in total crude lipid, whereas crude protein, and fat soluble vitamin levels were decreased, albeit slightly. A more comprehensive analysis of the fatty acid composition of S, G and F diets containing specific graded amounts of lecithin is presented in Table 3. All three experimental diet designed to meet the stage of growth of experimental birds with increasing lecithin content produced significant increases in linoleic (C18:2, n-6), the primary PUFA; relatively lower, but also increased contents of linolenic (C18:3, n-3 and arachidonic (C20:4, n-6), respectively. Changes in PUFA content corresponded to similar magnitudes of change in MUFAs (P<0.05) and reflect the contribution of PUFA derived from lecithin and loss of oleic acid derived from tallow. These modifications in fatty acid contents did not alter appreciably the gross energy and total crude lipid contents of respective diets.

Nutrient Experimental Diets
Starter Grower Finished
DM 1
Metabolizable Energy (kcal/kg)
87
3000
86
3090
86
3160
Crude Protein (%) 23.0 21.0 19.0
Lysine (%) 1.23 1.09 0.95
Methionine (%) 0.45 0.44 0.38
Methionine +
Cysteine (%)
0.82 0.75 0.67
Arginine (%) 1.56 1.39 1.22
Threonine (%) 0.88 0.80 0.71
Crude Fat (%) 5.25-5.41 6.33-6.55 6.52-6.74
Crude Fibre (%) 2.80 2.70 2.60
Calcium (%) 1.00 0.95 0.95
Total Phosphorus (%) 0.79 0.75 0.73
Available
Phosphorus (%)
0.45 0.43 0.43
Sodium (%) 0.18 0.17 0.17
Vitamin A (IU/Kg) 11500 10000 8000
Vitamin D (IU/Kg) 3000 2700 2160
Vitamin E (IU/Kg) 50 40 32

1DM=% Dry Weight.

Table 2: Nutrient content of experimental broiler diets.

  Proportion of Lecithin in Diet2
0L 25L 50L 100L
S Diets3
Gross energy4 4692.2 4630.6 4642.2 4603.3
Total crude lipids5 6.08 6.30 6.12 6.12
Fatty acid6
12:0 0.044 ± 0.001 0.051 ± 0.009 0.021 ± 0.032 0.026 ± 0.018
14:0 0.953 ± 0.039a 0.874 ± 0.016b 0.769 ± 0.006c 0.677 ± 0.003d
16:0 19.931 ± 0.003a 19.153 ± 0.051b 18.609 ± 0.052c 18.032 ± 0.037d
16:1 2.193 ± 0.001a 1.837 ± 0.047b 1.472 ± 0.043c 0.826 ± 0.018d
18:0 8.529 ± 0.005a 8.656 ± 0.155a 8.258 ± 0.064b 7.671 ± 0.003c
18:1 36.583 ± 0.002a 34.453 ± 0.173b 31.705 ± 0.079c 25.201 ± 0.044d
18:2 29.241 ± 0.001a 32.25 ± 0.026b 36.044 ± 0.059c 43.691 ± 0.049d
18:3 2.222 ± 0.003a 2.417 ± 0.004b 2.803 ± 0.002c 3.541 ± 0.007d
20:0 0.305 ± 0.003a 0.309 ± 0.002a 0.318 ± 0.006b 0.335 ± 0.002c
G Diet
Gross energy 4725.6 5139.4 4672.8 4639.4
Total crude lipids 5.694 6.929 6.708 6.755
Fatty acid
12:0 0.040 ± 0.002a 0.036 ± 0.010b 0.061 ± 0.001c 0.081 ± 0.001d
14:0 0.773 ± 0.003a 0.752 ± 0.007a 0.617 ± 0.023b 0.432 ± 0.007c
16:0 18.229 ± 0.021a 18.955 ± 0.057b 18.350 ± 0.028c 17.384 ± 0.002d
16:1 2.131 ± 0.043a 1.817 ± 0.006b 1.423 ± 0.019c 0.576 ± 0.016d
18:0 9.520 ± 0.025a 9.125 ± 0.077b 8.218 ± 0.008c 6.923 ± 0.038d
18:1 40.401 ± 0.033a 37.139 ± 0.058b 33.377 ± 0.094c 24.414 ± 0.020d
18:2 26.811 ± 0.007a 29.811 ± 0.086b 34.818 ± 0.042c 45.841 ± 0.007d
18:3 1.816 ± 0.011a 2.056 ± 0.019b 2.805 ± 0.001c 4.000 ± 0.001d
20:0 0.314 ± 0.010a 0.317 ± 0.002a 0.349 ± 0.004b 0.349 ± 0.006b
F Diet
Gross energy 4691.7 4692.2 4675.0 4643.3
Total crude lipids 6.765 6.747 6.320 6.228
Fatty acid§
12:0 0.049 ± 0.001a 0.049 ± 0.001a 0.056 ± 0.002b 0.053 ± 0.001b
14:0 0.905 ± 0.002a 0.857 ± 0.004b 0.760 ± 0.002c 0.647 ± 0.001d
16:0 19.351 ± 0.225a 18.890 ± 0.049b 18.550 ± 0.004c 17.446 ± 0.001d
16:1 2.181 ± 0.009a 1.832 ± 0.008b 1.473 ± 0.001c 0.644 ± 0.001d
18:0 9.359 ± 0.019a 8.862 ± 0.006b 8.551 ± 0.001c 7.089 ± 0.001d
18:1 40.739 ± 0.304a 37.343 ± 0.065b 34.012 ± 0.001c 25.260 ± 0.001d
18:2 25.582 ± 0.118a 29.672 ± 0.004b 33.692 ± 0.004c 44.844 ± 0.001d
18:3 1.686 ± 0.014a 2.146 ± 0.001b 2.549 ± 0.002c 3.547 ± 0.175d
20:0 0.354 ± 0.004a 0.347 ± 0.008ab 0.361 ± 0.002bc 0.368 ± 0.002c

Data (Mean ± SD, n=10) are weight percentage of total fatty acids;
a,b,cData in the same row with unlike superscripts are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
20L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow
3Diets: S=Starter; G=Grower; F=Finish. 4 GE=Gross Energy (kilocalories/kg), 5 TCL= Total crude lipid (% wet basis), 6 FA=Fatty acid (% total FA).

Table 3. Energy and fatty acid profile of starter, grower and finish experimental broiler diets1.

The color characteristics and cook-loss parameters of the broiler breast and leg muscle meats following steam cooking is given in Table 4 respectively. There was no change in Hunter lab L, a, b values for both cooked breast and leg samples derived from birds fed the different lecithin containing diets. Cook-loss was significantly (P<0.05) greater in breast meats derived from birds fed the soy lecithin containing diets; but not influenced by the level of lecithin fed. A parallel decline (P<0.05) in phospholipid content of breast tissue occurred with cook-loss only in breast meats obtained from birds fed higher lecithin content diets (Table 4). A similar effect was observed for both cook-losses and total phospholipid content in cooked leg meats derived from birds fed 50% and 100% lecithin diets (Table 4).

a.
Parameter
Proportion of Lecithin in Diet
0L2 25L 50L 100L
Color: L 40.90 ± 1.20 40.86 ± 0.71 38.34 ± 0.68 39.54 ± 0.44
a 4.02 ± 0.49 3.37 ± 0.39 4.58 ± 0.35 4.52 ± 0.27
b 9.73 ± 0.23 9.47 ± 0.33 9.45 ± 0.12 9.71 ± 0.29
Cook Loss3 26.06 ± 1.10a 31.10 ± 0.68b 31.39 ± 0.72b 32.03 ± 0.37b
PhL4 1.10 ± 0.01a 1.07 ± 0.02a 0.98 ± 0.02b 0.85 ± 0.01c
b.
Parameter
Proportion of Lecithin in Diet
0L2 25L 50L 100L
Color: L 39.49 ± 1.01 40.77 ± 0.73 38.69 ± 0.71 40.63 ± 0.71
a 6.28 ± 0.29 5.70 ± 0.21 6.11 ± 0.21 5.83 ± 0.14
b 9.26 ± 0.23 9.14 ± 0.24 9.12 ± 0.24 10.04 ± 0.19
Cook Loss3 25.83 ± 1.05a 31.89 ± 0.48b 29.88 ± 1.10b 29.52 ± 0.50b
PhL4 1.66 ± 0.04a 2.19 ± 0.08b 0.92 ± 0.02c 0.86 ± 0.02c

1Results are means ± means (N=10 birds/group)
a,b,cData in the same row with unlike superscripts are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
20L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.
3Results given as g/100g
4PhL = Phospholipids (mg/g)

Table 4: Physical and chemical attributes of breast(A) and leg(B) meat of birds fed experimental diets1.

The relative changes in fatty acid composition in breast meats derived from broiler diets varying in lecithin content are presented in Table 5a. Breast meats derived from birds fed a minimum of 50% lecithin supplement in the diet showed significant increases (P<0.05) in both C18:2 and C18:3 PUFAs, which also corresponded to a relatively higher P/S ratio. Refrigeration storing of the cooked breast meat (Table 5b) did not have produce a change in PUFA content compared to fresh cooked meats (Table 5a), indicating stability of these essential fatty acids during cold storage. A similar comparison was done on cooked leg meats that were examined fresh (e.g. non-stored -Table 6a) and also after refrigeration storage (Table 6b). Both fresh and stored cooked broiler leg meats had elevated C18:2, n-6 and C18:3, n-3 PUFA content in birds fed a minimum of 50% lecithin supplement that corresponded to higher P/S ratio. Unlike the breast muscle however; a small loss of both C18:2, n-6 and C18:3, n-3 PUFAs were observed in leg meats that were refrigeration stored after cooking. In breast meat, the relative reduction in MUFA content paralleled an increase (P<0.05) in PUFA in birds fed 100% lecithin supplement, regardless of having cold storage after cooking (Table 7a, b- P<0.05). A similar set of changes in MUFA content were observed in leg meats collected from birds fed 100% lecithin supplement, regardless of storage (Table 7a, b- P<0.05). No change in saturated fatty acid content was observed with lecithin feeding in both breast and leg meats (Table 7a and 7b).

Fatty Acid Proportion of Lecithin in Diet
0L 25L 50L 100L
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
12:0 0.025ab 0.007 0.038ab 0.020 0.054a 0.011 0.020b 0.004
14:0 0.783a 0.010 0.707a 0.059 0.964b 0.033 0.79a 0.034
16:0 25.448a 0.873 23.701ab 0.662 23.690b 0.386 24.126ab 0.442
16:1 5.772a 0.739 4.737ab 0.209 4.223ab 0.683 3.934b 0.708
18:0 9.380 1.375 9.272 1.052 11.082 0.509 10.522 0.769
18:1 43.715a 1.480 42.404a 3.01 39.122b 1.78 35.745b 1.27
18:2 14.286a 1.498 17.882ab 2.343 19.964b 2.281 23.298c 2.359
18:3 0.560a 0.086 1.154b 0.190 1.239b 0.165 1.690c 0.289
20:4 0.098a 0.024 0.095a 0.026 0.124a 0.011 0.107a 0.002
(P/S) 0.415a 0.041 0.503b 0.067 0.590b 0.043 0.700c 0.082

Table 5a: Fatty acid profile of non-stored, cooked breast muscle§

Fatty Acid Proportion of Lecithin in Diet
0L 25L 50L 100L
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
12:0 0.157a 0.039 0.177a 0.066 0.027b 0.003 0.072b 0.022
14:0 1.016a 0.099 0.869b 0.001 1.004ab 0.026 0.839b 0.010
16:0 24.911a 0.310 23.626b 0.515 23.825b 0.184 24.249ab 0.333
16:1 5.188a 0.595 4.276a 0.367 4.478a 0.943 3.314b 0.131
18:0 10.930 0.682 10.664 0.054 11.295 0.738 10.383 0.075
18:1 42.769a 1.784 41.887a 1.651 39.231a 1.598 33.810b 0.860
18:2 14.846a 1.336 17.643a 0.948 18.889b 1.580 25.488c 0.495
18:3 0.785a 0.039 1.073b 0.123 1.147c 0.059 1.759d 0.117
20:4 0.062a 0.030 0.085b 0.010 0.103b 0.019 0.083b 0.028
(P/S) 0.421a 0.030 0.528b 0.020 0.552b 0.031 0.764c 0.009

§Values represent mean ± S.D. (n=3) of weight percentage of total fatty acids.
0L=0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L=25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L=50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L=100% lecithin, 0% tallow.
Polyunsaturate (P) to Saturate (S) ratio.
a,b,cMean values within the same row with unlike superscript letter were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).

Table 5b: Fatty acid profile of 5-day stored, cooked breast muscle§.

Fatty Acid Proportion of Lecithin in Diet
0L 25L 50L 100L
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
12:0 0.033 0.019 0.051 0.014 0.039 0.007 0.025 0.007
14:0 0.796a 0.066 0.642b 0.058 0.669ab 0.035 0.594b 0.025
16:0 25.779 2.79 23.543 0.553 23.101 0.296 23.376 1.314
16:1 7.502a 1.54 5.845ab 0.303 5.676ab 0.705 3.745b 0.340
18:0 7.320 0.905 7.112 0.473 7.114 0.083 7.640 0.389
18:1 48.276a 3.35 44.773a 2.32 43.505a 1.32 36.680b 1.41
18:2 12.656a 2.10 18.608a 3.01 18.449a 2.02 26.865b 1.75
18:3 0.899a 0.076 1.346a 0.330 1.338a 0.157 1.995b 0.026
20:4 0.069a 0.008 0.077a 0.004 0.076a 0.003 0.084a 0.006
(P/S) 0.405a 0.097 0.607a 0.128 0.638a 0.074 0.910b 0.050

Table 6a: Fatty acid profile of cooked non-stored, cooked leg muscle§.

Fatty Acid Proportion of Lecithin in Diet
0L 25L 50L 100L
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
12:0 0.064a 0.008 0.045ab 0.013 0.028b 0.003 0.027b 0.006
14:0 0.085a 0.044 0.624b 0.058 0.760b 0.163 0.635b 0.029
16:0 25.225 1.710 23.249 0.401 23.241 0.317 23.511 0.147
16:1 7.307a 0.631 5.685a 0.147 5.604a 0.808 4.615b 0.806
18:0 7.176 0.243 7.548 0.637 7.336 0.043 7.946 0.035
18:1 46.812a 0.993 42.441a 1.125 43.891a 0.829 40.022b 3.834
18:2 12.362a 1.680 19.033a 2.661 17.793a 1.619 21.600b 4.037
18:3 0.818a 0.051 1.357a 0.304 1.265a 0.132 1.604b 0.394
20:4 0.059a 0.017 0.057a 0.007 0.080a 0.045 0.060a 0.002
(P/S) 0.406a 0.070 0.649a 0.112 0.606a 0.059 0.710a 0.132

§Values represent mean ± S.D. (n=3) of weight percentage of total fatty acids.
0L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.
Polyunsaturates (P) to Saturates (S) ratio.
a,b,cMean values within the same row with unlike superscript letter were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).

Table 6b: Fatty acid profile of 5-day stored, cooked leg muscle§.

Treatment2
Cooked-NS Saturated3 Monounsaturate4 Polyunsaturate5 P/S
Breast
0L 39.51 ± 2.07a 42.16 ± 2.70a 18.32 ± 0.65a 0.42 ± 0.04
25L 37.25 ± 2.46a 44.89 ± 2.26a 17.93 ± 0.49a 0.56 ± 0.07
50L 36.10 ± 1.10a 43.84 ± 0.56a 20.02 ± 1.10b 0.59 ± 0.07
100L 38.70 ± 1.13a 37.06 ± 2.04b 24.24 ± 0.92b 0.70 ± 0.08
Leg
0L 34.89 ± 0.33a 47.85 ± 2.57a 16.70 ± 3.20a 0.41 ± 0.10
25L 34.31 ± 0.32a 45.11 ± 0.48a 20.58 ± 0.44a 0.64 ± 0.13
50L 34.88 ± 1.84a 44.53 ± 1.40a 20.61 ± 1.59a 0.64 ± 0.07
100L 35.63 ± 1.56a 37.95 ± 2.03a 26.42 ± 0.96b 0.91 ± 0.05

1Data (Mean ± SD, n=10) are weight percentage of total fatty acids;
a,b,cData in the same row with unlike superscripts are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
20L=0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L=25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow
3Saturated fatty acids: lauric (12:0), myristic (14:0), palmitic (16:0), stearic (18:0), arachidonic (20:0);
4Monounsaturated fatty acids: palmitoleic (16:1), oleic (18:1);
5Total Polyunsaturated fatty acids: linoleic (18:2, n-6), α-linolenic (18:3, n-3), arachidonic (C20:4, n-6)

Table 7a: Total Saturated, Monounsaturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty acid content (% ) in non-stored, cooked breast and leg meats1.

Treatment2
Cooked-5-day stored muscle- Saturated3 Monounsaturate4 Polyunsaturate5 P/S
Breast
0L 39.14 ± 3.12a 45.33 ± 3.91a 15.51 ± 0.79a 0.42 ± 0.030
25L 37.16 ± 3.2a 46.56 ± 2.41a 16.38 ± 0.93a 0.53 ± 0.020
50L 37.58 ± 4.09a 45.04 ± 2.56a 17.33 ± 1.61a 0.55 ± 0.031
100L 39.74 ± 1.21a 38.29 ± 1.27b 21.90 ± 0.91b 0.76 ± 0.0090
Leg
0L 35.68 ± 0.72a 48.92 ± 3.37a 15.46 ± 2.76a 0.41 ± 0.070
25L 33.03 ± 2.48a 48.19 ± 2.94a 18.75 ± 1.06a 0.65 ± 0.11
50L 36.31 ± 1.05a 43.38 ± 0.69b 20.31 ± 0.35b 0.61 ± 0.059
100L 33.50 ± 2.53a 41.78 ± 2.58b 24.72 ± 0.49b 0.72 ± 0.13

1Data (Mean ± SD, n=10) are weight percentage of total fatty acids;
a,b,cData in the same row with unlike superscripts are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
20L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.
3Saturated fatty acids: lauric (12:0), myristic (14:0), palmitic (16:0), stearic (18:0), arachidonic (20:0);
4Monounsaturated fatty acids: palmitoleic (16:1), oleic (18:1);
5Total Polyunsaturated fatty acids: linoleic (18:2, n-6), α-linolenic (18:3, n-3), arachidonic (C20:4, n-6).

Table 7b: Total Saturated, Monounsaturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty acid content (%) in cooked, 5-day stored breast and leg meats1.

Lipid oxidation as measured by TBARs in both cooked breast and leg muscle meats derived from tallow fed birds showed a significant temporal increase (P<0.05) over a 5-day refrigeration storage period. Birds fed 100% lecithin supplement had reduced TBARs in cooked breast meat after 5-days of refrigerated storage compared to the tallow fed counterparts (Figure 1a). The protection against TBARs formation with lecithin supplement feeding was more pronounced in leg meats after 5- day refrigerated storage (Figure 1b). This effect was observed regardless of the level of lecithin supplement fed.

nutrition-food-sciences-cooked-breast

a-cDietary treatments with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05). 0L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.

Figure 1a: Lipid oxidation is expressed as TBARS (mg MDA/kg) meat in cooked breast of birds fed diets containing lecithin.

nutrition-food-sciences-cooked-leg

a-cDietary treatments with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05). 0L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.

Figure 1b: Lipid oxidation expressed as TBARS (mg MDA/kg) in cooked leg muscle of birds fed diets containing lecithin.

Sensory evolution data conducted with 12 trained panelists on qualities of oxidation of 5-day stored cooked broiler breast derived from birds fed diets on different levels of lecithin is shown in spider diagrams Figure 2a. The counterpart sensory analysis conducted on leg meat is shown in Figure 2b. Negligible differences in ranking of aroma, flavor and texture descriptors were obtained for breast meats derived from lecithin supplement treatments compared to tallow-fed controls. The one exception however; was with the cooked breast meat that was obtained from broilers fed the 100% lecithin supplement diet, where panelists perceived that this breast meat contained a significantly (P<0.05) reduced cardboard aroma compared to counterparts fed the tallow control diet. There were also no differences in texture, as measured using first impression tenderness or initial juiciness in breast meat collected from birds fed varying levels of lecithin supplement. Cooked leg muscle also gave no noticeable differences in aroma, flavor or texture between lecithin supplement and tallow dietary treatments.

nutrition-food-sciences-texture-attributes

Figure 2a: Sensory scored for aroma, taste, flavour and texture attributes of cooked breast (A) of birds fed diets containing lecithin 0L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.

nutrition-food-sciences-fed-diets

Figure 2b: Sensory scored for aroma, taste, flavour and texture attributes of cooked leg (B) muscle of birds fed diets containing lecithin 0L = 0% lecithin, 100% tallow; 25L = 25% lecithin, 75% tallow; 50L = 50% lecithin, 50% tallow; 100L = 100% lecithin, 0% tallow.

Discussion

The physical and chemical attributes of both breast and leg muscle were relatively the same in broilers fed different levels of dietary lecithin supplement, in comparison to tallow fed birds. The higher cook-loss in muscle meats derived from birds fed higher dietary lecithin levels could explain the relatively lower phospholipid content in cooked meats. The phospholipid content of both cooked leg and breast muscle meats were indeed lower than the non-cooked samples. In the cooked, 5-day stored muscle meats, the phospholipid content was lowered to an even greater extent than the fresh cooked meats; again, suggesting that the combination of drip-loss and possibly lipid oxidation could of attributed to this effect. Cooking liberates inorganic iron from myoglobin and iron-containing pigments in the meat [21] thus producing a situation where metal ion induced lipid oxidation can occur in cooked muscle; especially when antioxidant capacity is limiting. The fact that further loss of phospholipid was not as apparent in 5-day stored breast and leg meats suggests that the antioxidant potential of lecithin was carried over during storage, thus stabilizing the PUFA content, as indexed by the little change in phospholipid content.

The quality and composition of fat deposition in poultry is principally affected by the diet composition and the metabolism of the bird [22]. Several studies have shown that altering the source of dietary lipid for birds will result in a body fat composition that mirrors the fat source [28,33,36,37]. Important changes in fatty acid composition related to enhanced PUFA content of breast meat in particular cannot be attributed only to dietary modification with lecithin supplement feeding, but also to controlling lipid peroxidation. The combination of cooking and a 5-day cold storage of muscle meats reduced PUFA content in both breast and leg muscles in the tallow, more so than lecithin supplemented broilers, indicating that lecithin could be used to render ready-to-eat poultry meats more acceptable due to reducing potential for lipid oxidation. The best results were: however, obtained when the tallow component was completely replacing in the diet with lecithin; this corresponding to reduced loss of PUFA and reduced production of lipid oxidation products.

Heat treatment, such as steaming of the poultry muscle meats increases subsequent TBAR content, a finding which corresponds to the fact that poultry meat products have a relatively low α-tocopherol content and higher PUFA content [21]; this being a feature of poultry meats being potentially more susceptible to lipid oxidation reactions than other muscle meats [38]. Moreover, cooked leg muscle meat produced a greater TBARs content, than the corresponding treatments of breast muscle, which can be explained by the fact that poultry leg muscle contains greater prooxidant (e.g. heme iron) [39], which when released would catalyze peroxidation reactions. In tallow fed birds, a relatively lower P/S ratio in cooked poultry meats paralleled an increase in TBARs, a dominant secondary lipid oxidation product. In the present study, the higher P/S ratio in meats recovered from lecithin supplemented fed broilers was retained indicating a possible antioxidant property of the dietary lecithin.

The descriptors used in this study for assessing meat quality are common for sensory assessment of poultry meats [40]. For example, in the present study, sensory attributes for odour were evaluated using descriptors such as “chicken aroma,” “cardboard aroma,” and “oxidized aroma”; all defined to characterize the smell and odor of cooked chicken muscle and the aroma of oxidized fat. Using these descriptors, negligible differences in aroma, flavour, and texture were perceived by panellists, thus confirming that the level of oxidation of cooked broiler breast and leg tissue was minimal in the lecithin fed birds. Using the sensory results that indicated detection of lipid oxidation off flavor, with the finding that showed increased levels of TBARs in the 5-day stored chicken breast and leg muscle of tallow fed birds in this study, points to the fact that quality attributes of cold stored poultry meat products can be lost without the protection provided by antioxidant agents incorporated into the meat systems. Feeding lecithin, albeit at a level that replaced tallow, limited the amount of lipid oxidation in breast meat products to an extent that was detectable by sensory evaluation. This was less apparent in the poultry leg meats. King and others [41] have reported antioxidant activity of phospholipids, total lipids, and neutral lipids extracted from bluefish (Pomatomus saltaatrix) in a salmon oil model system. The phospholipid components exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity among other lipids. Nwosu and others [42] also studied the antioxidant property of phospholipids in a bulk fish oil system and suggested that the choline or ethanolamine head group of the phospholipid molecule had an integral part in the antioxidant behaviour of phospholipids. The observed enhanced oxidative stability of the oil was attributed to a chelating function of the phospholipids amine group towards prooxidant metal ions. Cho and others [43] also found that phospholipid composition influenced oxidative stability of lipids from squid tissues, with phosphatidylethanolamine being superior to phosphatidylcholine at stabilizing lipid in squid viscera. In the present study, cooking poultry meat products, combined with subsequent 5-day storage, would also be expected to liberate bound transition metal ions from denatured protein, as described above, thus resulted in greater liberation of free metal ions for potential prooxidant activity. The fact that both chemical and sensory indices of lipid oxidation from muscle lipids derived from birds fed the higher lecithin containing diets did not exhibit the same level of development of lipid oxidation in breast and leg muscles indicates that stabilization of the enhanced PUFA content was achieved by the dietary lecithin fed to the birds. This occurred despite the fact that some of the phospholipid incorporated in muscle systems was lost in drip-loss after cooking; however, what was retained indeed provided protection against lipid peroxidation.

Conclusion

Replacement of tallow with soy lecithin in diets of broiler chickens successfully enhanced the total PUFA contents of both breast and leg muscles. As lecithin replaced tallow in the diet, the levels of TBARS in the cooked breast and leg muscles were reduced, which paralleled the enhanced PUFA content. However, as expected, the TBARs content of the leg muscle was generally found to be greater than that of the breast muscle. The data from the sensory evaluation confirmed the oxidative stability of the cooked, 5-day stored broiler breast meat, characterized from typical aroma, flavour, and texture descriptors, could be detected.

The greater oxidative stability of the cooked broiler muscle derived from birds fed the high lecithin supplemented diets, is consistent with the potential antioxidant effect of lecithin.

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank Drs. Stewart Ritchie (DVM) and William Cox (DVM) from Canadian Poultry Consultants, Ltd. 30325 Canary Court, Abbotsford, B.C. V4X 2N4 for their generous support and assistance in conducting this study. Study was funded in part by NSERC-Discovery and UBC-Vitamin grants to DDK.

References

  1. Kinsella JE (1986) Food components with potential therapeutic benefits: The N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids of fish oils. Food Technol.
  2. Simopoulos AP (2002) The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed Pharmacother 56: 365-379.
  3. Simopoulos AP (2008) The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases. Exp Biol Med 233: 674-688.
  4. Simopoulos AP (2016) An increase in the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio increases the risk for obesity. Nutrients 8: 128.
  5. Harris WS, Mozaffarian D, Rimm E, Kris-Etherton P, Rudel LL, et al. (2009) Omega-6 fatty acids and risk for cardiovascular disease. Circulation 119: 902-907.
  6. Patterson E, Wall R, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP, Stanton C (2012) Health implications of high dietary Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Nutr Metab 2012: 1-16.
  7. Massaro M, Scoditti E, Sarluccio MA (2010) Nutraceuticals and prevention of atherosclerosis: focus on ω‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and mediterranean diet polyphenols. Cardiovasc Ther 28: e13-19.
  8. Carter JF (1993) Potential of flaxseed and flaxseed oil in baked goods and other products in human nutrition. Cereal Foods World 38: 753-759.
  9. Soewono A, Kitts DD (2007) Quality changes of heated flaxseed oil-palm oil and fish oil-palm oil blends containing natural antioxidants stabilizers. Int J Food Sci Technol 2: 41-55.
  10. Yep YL, Li D, Mann NJ, Bode O, Sinclair AJ (2002) Bread enriched with microencapsulated tuna oil increases plasma docosahexaenoic acid and total omega-3 fatty acids in humans. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 11: 285-291.
  11. Goldberg EN, Ryland D, Gibson RA, Aliani M, House JD (2013) Designer laying hen diets to improve egg fatty acid profile and maintain sensory quality. Food Sci Nutr 1: 324-335.
  12. Dvorin A, Zoref Z, Mokady S, Nitsan Z (1998) Nutritional aspects of hydrogenated and regular soybean oil added to diets of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 77: 820-825.
  13. Bernal-Gomez WE, Mancini-Filho J (2003) Enriched eggs as a source of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Alimentaria 349: 105-109.
  14. Carragher JF, Mühlhäusler BS, Geier MS, House JD, Hughes RJ, et al. (2015) Effect of dietary ALA on growth rate, feed conversion ratio, mortality rate and breast meat omega-3 LCPUFA content in broiler chickens. Anim Prod Sci 56: 815-823.
  15. Mantzioris E, Cleland LG, Gibson RA, Neumann MA, Demasi M, et al. (2000) Biochemical effects of a diet containing foods enriched with n-3 fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr 72: 42-48.
  16. Kolanowski W, Laufenberg G (2006) Enrichment of food products with polyunsaturated fatty acids by fish oil addition. Eur Food Res Technol 222: 472-477.
  17. Pinchasov Y, Nir I (1992) Effect of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid concentration on performance, fat deposition, and carcass fatty acid composition of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 71: 1504-1512.
  18. Gallardo G, Guida L, Martinez V, López MC, Bernhardt D, et al. (2013) Microencapsulation of linseed oil by spray drying for functional food application. Food Res Int 52: 473-482.
  19. Sipos EF, Szuhaj BF (1996) Lecithins. In: Baileys Industrial Oil & Fat Products (Hui YH 5th Edn). NY. Wiley-Interscience Publication.
  20. Ajuyah AO, Ahn DU, Hardin RT, Sim JS (1993) Dietary antioxidants and storage affect chemical characteristics of omega-3 fatty enriched broiler chicken meats. J Food Sci 58: 43-46.
  21. Pearson AM, Gray JI, Wolzak AM, Horenstein NA (1983) Safety implications of oxidized lipids in muscle foods. Food Technol 37: 121-129.
  22. Gray JI, Pearson AM (1987) Rancidity and warmed-over flavour. In: Advances in meat research: restructured meat and poultry products. NY. Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  23. Bou R, Guardiola F, Grau A, Grimpa S, Manich A, et al. (2001) Influence of dietary fat source, α-tocopherol, and ascorbic acid supplementation on sensory quality of dark chicken meat. Poultry Sci 80: 800-807.
  24. Dal-Bosco A, Castellini C, Bianchi L, Mugnai C (2004) Effect of dietary α–linolenic acid and vitamin E on the fatty acid composition, storage stability and sensory traits of rabbit meat. Meat Sci 66: 407-413.
  25. Lai SM, Gray JI, Booren AM, Crackel R, Gill JL (1995) Assessment of off-flavor development in restructured chicken nuggets using hexanal and TBARS measurements and sensory evaluation. J Sci Food Agric 67: 447-452.
  26. Huang J, Yang D, Gao S, Wang T (2008) Effects of soy-lecithin on lipid metabolism and hepatic expression of lipogenic genes in broiler chicken. Livest Sci 118: 53-60.
  27. Evans EI (1935) Antioxidant properties of vegetable lecithins. Ind Eng Chem 27: 329-331.
  28. Dziedzic SZ, Hudzon BJF (1984) Phosphatidyl ethanolamine as a synergist for primary antioxidants in edible oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61: 1042-1045.
  29. Hilderbrand DH (1984) Phospholipids plus tocopherols increase soybean oil stability. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61: 552-555.
  30. Koga T, Terao J (1994) Antioxidant activity of a novel phosphatidyl derivative of vitamin E in lard and its model system. J Agric Food Chem 42: 1291-1294.
  31. Koga T, Terao J (1995) Phospholipids increase radical-scavenging activity of vitamin E in a bulk oil model system. J Agric Food Chem 43: 1450-1454.
  32. Lin CF, Gray JI, Aschar A, Buckley DJ, Booren AM, et al. (1989) Effects of dietary oils and α-tocopherol supplementation on lipid composition and stability of broiler meat. J Food Sci 54: 1457-1460.
  33. Zanini SF, Torres CAA, Bragagnolo N, Turatti JM, Silva MG, et al. (2004) Effect of oil sources and vitamin E levels in the diet on the composition of fatty acids in rooster thigh and chest meat. J Sci Food Agric 84: 672-682.
  34. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids for animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226: 497-509.
  35. Buege JA, Aust SD (1978) Microsomal Lipid Peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 52: 302-310.
  36. Blanch A, Barroeta AC, Baucells MD, Serrano X, Puchal F (1996) Utilization of different fats and oils by adult chickens as a source of energy, lipid and fatty acids. Anim Feed Sci Technol 61: 335-342.
  37. Cherian G, Wolfe FW, Sim JS (1996) Dietary oils with added tocopherols: effects on egg or tissue tocopherols, fatty acids, and oxidative stability. Poult Sci 75: 423-431.
  38. Higgins FM, Kerry JP, Buckley DJ, Morrissey PA (1999) Effects of alpha-tocopheryl acetate supplementation and salt addition on the oxidative stability (TBARS) and warmed-over flavour (WOF) of cooked turkey meat. Br Poult Sci 40: 59-64.
  39. Pikul J, Leszczynki DE, Kummerow FA (1984) Relative role of phospholipids, triacylglycerols, and cholesterol esters on malonaldehyde formation in fat extracted from chicken meat. J Food Sci 49: 704-708.
  40. Nute GR (1999) Sensory assessment of poultry meat. In: Poultry Meat Science (Richardson RI, Mead, GC Edn). Wallingford, U.K. CABI Publishing, Volume 25.
  41. King MF, Boyd LC, Sheldon BW (1992) Effects of phospholipids on lipid oxidation of a salmon oil model system. J Am Oil Chem Soc 69: 237-242.
  42. Nwosu CV, Boyd LC, Sheldon B (1997) Effect of fatty acid composition of phospholipids on their antioxidant properties and activity index. J Am Oil Chem Soc 74: 293-297.
  43. Cho SY, Joo DS, Choi HG, Nara E, Miyashita K (2001) Oxidative stability of lipids from squid tissues. Fish Sci 67: 738-743.
Citation: Mu K, Kitts DD (2018) Use of Soy Lecithin to Improve Nutritional Quality of Poultry Meats and its Effect on Stability and Sensory Attributes. J Nutr Food Sci 8:714.

Copyright: © 2018 Mu K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top