GET THE APP

Proximate, Mineral and Antinutrient Compositions of Indigenous Ok
Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9600

Research Article - (2015) Volume 0, Issue 0

Proximate, Mineral and Antinutrient Compositions of Indigenous Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Pod Accessions: Implications for Mineral Bioavailability

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede1,3*, Gulelat Desse Haki2, Fekadu Beyene1, Ashagrie Z. Woldegiorgis3 and Sudip Kumar Rakshit4
1Department of Food Technology and Process Engineering, Wollega University, P.O.Box: 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia
2Department of Food Science and Technology, Botswana Collage of Agriculture, Botswana University, Gaborone, Botswana
3Center for Food Science and Nutrition program, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
4Department of Chemical Engineering, Canada Research Chair (Tier 1), Lakehead University, Thunder bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada
*Corresponding Author: Habtamu Fekadu Gemede, Department of Food Technology and Process Engineering, Wollega University, P.O.Box: 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia, Tel: +251576617981

Abstract

The promotion and consumption of indigenous vegetables could help to mitigate food insecurity and alleviate malnutrition in developing countries. The proximate, mineral and antinutrient compositions of eight accessions of Okra Pods were investigated. Molar ratios and mineral bioavailability of Okra pod accessions were also calculated and compared to the critical values to predict the implications for mineral bioavailability. Proximate and mineral composition of Okra pod accessions were determined using standard methods of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The result of the study revealed that the proximate composition (g/100 g) in dry weight basis was significantly (P<0.05) varied and ranged : moisture/dry matter 9.69-13.33, crude protein 10.25-26.16, crude fat 0.56- 2.49, crude fiber 11.97-29.93, crude ash 5.37-11.30, utilizable carbohydrate 56.42-69.92 and gross energy 257.50- 319.39 kcal/100 g. The mineral concentrations (mg/100 g) were also significantly (P<0.05) varied and ranged: calcium (111.11 to 311.95), Iron (18.30 to 36.68), potassium (122.59 to 318.20), zinc (3.83 to 6.31), phosphorus (25.62 to 59.72) and sodium (3.33 to 8.31) on dry weight bases. The Okra Pods of ‘OPA#6’ accession contained significantly higher amounts of crude protein, total ash, crude fat, gross energy, calcium, iron and zinc than all other accessions evaluated in this study. The results of anti-nutrients analysis showed that, except phytate, the tannin and oxalate contents of all the accessions were significantly (P<0.05) varied. The range of phytate, tannin and Ooxalate contents (mg/100 g) for Okra pod accessions studied were: 0.83 to 0.87, 4.93 to 9.90, 0.04 to 0.53, respectively. The calculated molar ratios of phytate: calcium, phytate: iron, phytate: zinc, oxalate: calcium and [Phytate][Calcium]/[Zinc] were below the critical value and this indicate that the bioavailability of Calcium, Iron and Zinc in these accessions could be high. The results of the study generally revealed that Okra pod contain appreciable amount of vital nutrients like protein, fibre, calcium, Iron and zinc and low in antinutrient contents with high mineral bioavailability. Therefore, increase the production and consumption of these nutrient rich indigenous Okra pods will help to supplement/ formulate the diets and alleviate the problems associated with malnutrition in the country.

Keywords: Okra, Pod, Proximate, Mineral, Antinutrient, Bioavailability, Accession

Introduction

Traditional vegetables are valuable sources of nutrients [1,2], with some having important medicinal properties [3]. Vegetables contribute substantially to food security [4]. Overcoming food and nutritional insecurity among women, pregnant and lactating mothers, and children under five years of age, remains a challenge in many developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa [5,6].

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) is an important vegetable crop [7-9] originated in Ethiopia [10-13]. This crop is one of the most widely known and utilized species of the family Malvaceae [14] Okra is known by many local names in different parts of the world [15]. It is called lady’s finger in England, gumbo in the United States of America, guinogombo in Spanish, guibeiro in Portuguese and bhindiin India [16,17]. In its origin of Ethiopia it is also called Kenkase (Berta), Andeha (Gumuz), Bamia (Oromica/Amharic) [18]. The name Okra probabily derives from one of Niger-Congo group of languages (the name for okra in the Twi language is nkuruma) [19]. The term okra was in the use of English by the late 18th century [20].

Okra is a multipurpose crop due to its various uses of the pods, fresh leaves, buds, flowers, stems and seeds. Okra immature fruits (pods), which are consumed as vegetables, can be used in salads, soups and stews, fresh or dried, fried or boiled [21]. Despite its nutritional compositions, Okra pod is a powerhouse of valuable nutrients [22] and affordable source of protein, carbohydrates, minerals, vitamins and dietary fibre [21]. Therefore, promoting the consumption of Okra pods could provide cheap sources of nutrients that can improve the nutritional status and reducing the prevalence of malnutrition especially among resource-constrained households and can also use as a means of dietary diversification. On the other hand the presence of anti-nutritional factors is one of the major drawbacks limiting the nutritional qualities of the food [23]. Okra pods are not only has beneficial nutrients but might contain traces of antinutritional factors, which may have adverse effects on bioavailability of some minerals like Calcuim, Iron and Zinc. However, okra has been considered as a minor crop and there is no single information or published studies available about nutritional, anti-nutritional and bioavailability of Okra pods grown in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the proximate, mineral, anti-nutrient and bioavailability of eight indigenous Okra pod accessions grown in Benishangul Gumuz Region, Ethiopia.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and preparation

Eight Okra pod accessions were harvested from Assosa agricultural research farm in Benishangul Gumiz Region, Ethiopia. Each of the collected accessions were coded, packed in polyethylene bags, kept in an ice box (to prevent moisture loss), and transported to Food Technology and Process Engineering Research laboratory of Wollega University, Ethiopia. Once in the laboratory, each of the Okra pod accessions were washed by distilled water and sliced to uniform thickness 5 mm using a stainless steel knife. The moisture content of each Okra pod accessions was determined immediate after sliced to uniform thickness. The sliced Okra Pod accessions were sun dried, followed by oven drying at 45°C. The dried Okra pod accessions were milled separately into fine powder using electric grinder until to pass through 0.425 mm sieve mesh size, and finally packed into airtight polyethylene plastic bags to minimize heat build-up and stored in the desiccator until required for analysis.

Proximate analysis

Moisture content, total ash, crude protein, crude fiber, and crude fat of the Okra pod accessions were determined according to AOAC [24] using sub components 925.09, 923.03, 979.09, 962.09, and 920.39, respectively. Utilizable Carbohydrate content of Okra pod accessions were calculated by difference Manzi [25]. The gross energy content of Okra pod accessions were determined by calculation from fat, carbohydrate and protein contents using the Atwater’s conversion factors; 16.7 kJ/g (4 kcal/g) for protein, 37.4 kJ/g (9 kcal/g) for fat and 16.7 kJ/g (4 kcal/g) for carbohydrates and expressed in calories Guyot [26].

Determination of mineral contents

Minerals content analysis was determined according to AOAC [24]. Sodium (Na) and Potassium (K) concentrations were determined by using the standard flame emission photometer; phosphorus (P) was determined colorimetrically by vanadomolybdate procedure. Calcium (Ca), Iron (Fe), and Zinc (Zn) concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometer.

Determination of antinutritional factors

Phytate was determined by the method of Vantraub and Lapteva [27]. Oxalate was analyzed using the method originally employed by Ukpabi and Ejidoh [28] in which the procedures involve three steps: digestion, oxalate precipitation, and permanganate titration. Tannin content was determined by the method of Maxson and Rooney [29].

Determination of molar ratio of antinutrients to minerals

The molar ratio between antinutrient and mineral was obtained after dividing the mole of antinutrient with the mole of minerals [30]. Phytate phosphorous was calculated by assuming phytate contains 28% phosphorus, i.e. [Phytate P = phytate * 0.28] and accordingly non phytate phosphorous = total phosphorous - phytate phosphorous and proportion of phosphorous as phytate was calculated by phytate phosphorus devided by total phosphorus [31].

Statistical analysis

The Completely Randomised Design (CRD) was used with two replicates. All the statistical analyses was performed on the results obtained using SPSS version 20.0 for windows. Data was evaluated by using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Means of results for each experiment was separated by the Duncan’s multiple range test and reported as mean ± standard error (SE). A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered as statistically significant.

Result and Discussion

Proximate composition

Food analysis is the resolution of the components of food into its proximate or ultimate parts [32]. Proximate analysis involves the determination of the major components of food as moisture, ash, crude fat, crude protein, crude fibre, and carbohydrate [33,34]. The proximate composition of Okra pod accessions were presented in Table 1.

Accessions Moisture Content
(g/100g)
Crude Protein
(g/100g)
Total Ash
(g/100g)
Crude Fiber
(g/100g)
Crude Fat
(g/100g)
Util. Carbohy.
(g/100g)
Gross Energy
(Kcal/100g)
OPA#1 10.61 ± 0.27c,d 20.75 ± 0.52b 6.05 ± 0.25c,d,e 16.58 ± 0.05e 1.39 ± 0.28b,c 69.92 ± 0.28a 316.46 ± 2.58a
OPA#2 13.33 ± 0.28a 10.25 ± 0.69e 6.66 ± 0.03c 17.13 ± 0.39e 1.67 ± 0.02b 67.89 ± 0.44a 313.18 ± 1.69a
OPA#3 12.17 ± 0.16b 13.94 ± 0.02d 10.20 ± 0.28b 21.95 ± 0.03d 1.14 ± 0.01c 56.42 ± 0.59c 276.89 ± 1.26c
OPA#4 11.29 ± 0.26c 17.16 ± 0.65c 5.37 ± 0.01e 24.35 ± 1.17c 1.69 ± 0.01b 63.22 ± 1.45b 289.58 ± 5.84b
OPA#5 10.66 ± 0.24c,d 12.97 ± 0.25d 10.60 ± 0.17a,b 21.69 ± 0.19d 0.56 ± 0.01d 56.54 ± 0.52c 273.62 ± 1.41c
OPA#6 9.69 ± 0.29e 26.16 ± 0.12a 11.30 ± 0.19a 11.97 ± 0.83f 2.49 ± 0.28a 62.96 ± 0.92b 319.39 ± 5.45a
OPA#7 10.38 ± 0.26d,e 14.16 ± 0.14d 5.62 ± 0.45d,e 26.42 ± 0.21b 0.58 ± 0.01d 61.78 ± 1.02b 274.62 ± 2.59c
OPA#8 10.22 ± 0.22d,e 16.24 ± 0.94c 6.39 ± 49c,d 29.93 ± 0.09a 0.56 ± 0.01d 56.52 ± 1.09c 257.50 ± 2.35d

Means not followed by the same superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of replicate determinations (n=2)
NB. OPA stands for Okra Pod Accession and # stands for number.

Table 1: Proximate composition of eight Okra pod accessions (dry weight bases).

Moisture content: Moisture content determination is an integral part of the proximate composition analysis of food. Moisture content of eight accessions of Okra pods were presented in Table 1. As fresh Okra pods vary considerably in water content, moisture contents were calculated on a dry-weight basis, which allows a greater consistency of data. This implies a factor from 1.10 to 1.14 must be multiplied as moisture correction factor for all the other analysis parameters. Okra pod accession ‘OPA#2’ had the highest moisture/dry matter content (13.33 g/100 g ) which was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the moisture/dry matter content of all the accessions whereas Okra pod accession ‘OPA#6’ had significantly (P<0.05) lower than the moisture/ dry matter content (9.69 g/100 g) of all the accessions except accession ‘OPA#8’ (10.22 g/100 g) and ‘OPA#7’ (10.38 g/100 g). Although fresh Okra pod accessions were ranged from 87.98-90.60 g/100 g water and this indicate that the Okra pods have a high moisture content. The high moisture content in okra pods accessions are in agreement with the finding of Adetuya [22]. Also this is in accordance with the finding of Goplana [35] (89 g/100 g) and Emmanuel [36] (88.47 g/100 g). Moisture content of any food is an index of its water activity and is used as a measure of stability and susceptibility to microbial contamination Edak [37]. The high moisture content in vegetables makes them vulnerable to microbial attack, hence spoilage Nwofia [38]. This high moisture content also implies that dehydration would increase the relative concentrations of other food nutrient and therefore improve the shelf-life and preservation of the fruits Arua [39]. There is also need to store the fruit in cool condition if they are to be kept for a long period without spoilage especially in the tropics were wastage of vegetable crops is estimated to be around 50% due to high moisture content Nwofia [38].

Crude protein: The main functions of proteins are growth and replacement of lost tissues in the human body. Table 1 shows the crude protein contents of the eight accessions of Okra pod used in the study. The protein content of the Okra pod accessions were varied significantly (P<0.05) from 10.25 g/100 g in ‘OPA#2’ to 26.16 g/100 g in ‘OPA#6’ on dry weight basis and this variation might be due to genetic factor. The mean value of the accessions obtained in the study are almost comparable with the find of Adetuya [22] (13.61 to 16.27 g/100 g) while higher than the value reported by Emmanuel [36] (4.81 g/100 g). Ogungbenle and Omosola [40] is also reported that the crude protein content of Okra pod is (23.4 g/100 g) which is higher than all the accession in the present study except ‘OPA#6’ (26.16 g/100 g). Okra can be considered a high protein vegetable when compared with moringa oliefera ( 4.2 g/100 g), Amarantus (6.1 g/100 g), Gnetum Africanum (1.5 g/100 g) and Pterocarpus (2.0 g/100 g) Nzikou [15] and this implies that Okra pod can serve as a good source of protein. Nwofia [38] reported that diet is nutritionally satisfactory, if it contains high caloric value and a sufficient amount of protein. It have been shown that any plant foods that provides about 12% of their calorific value from protein are considered good source of protein [41,42]. The pods of these accessions of Okra meets this requirements and this implies that Okra pod can serve as a good source of protein.

Crude fat: Crude fat content of eight accessions of Okra pods were presented in Table 1. The levels of crude fat varied from 0.56 g/100 g (‘OPA #8’ and ‘OPA #5’) to 2.49 g/100 g (‘OPA #6’). Okra pod accession ‘OPA#6’ had the highest crude fat content (2.49 g/100 g ) which was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the crude fat content of all the accessions whereas Okra pod accession ‘OPA#8’ and ‘OPA#5’ had significantly (P<0.05) lower than the crude fat content (0.56 g/100 g) of all the accessions except accession ‘OPA#7’ (0.58 g/100 g). In these finding, the crude fat content is higher than the value reported by Emmanuel [36] (0.18 g/100 g) whereas lower than the value reported by Adetuyi [22] (9.22 to 10.57 g/100 g). Dietary fats function in the increase of palatability of food by absorbing and retaining flavour [43]. Excess consumption of fat have been implicated in certain cardiovascular disorders such as atherosclerosis, cancer and aging whereas a diet providing 1-2% of its caloric of energy as fat is said to be sufficient to human beings [44], in this regard, the consumption of Okra pod diet should be encouraged to reduce the risk of above diseases in man.

Crude fibre: Dietary fibre promotes the growth and protects the beneficial intestinal flora. Moreover, high intake of fibre reduces the risk of colon cancer [45]. The crude fiber content among the accessions of Okra pod varied from 11.97 g/100 g to 29.93 g/100 g in ‘OPA#6’ and ‘OPA#8’ accessions, respectively. The accession, ‘OPA#8’ had significantly (P<0.05) higher (29.93 g/100 g) in crude fibre content and was followed by ‘OPA#7’ (26.42 g/100 g), ‘OPA#4’ (24.35 g/100 g), ‘OPA#3’ (21.95 g/100 g) in that order however, the accession ‘OPA#6’ recorded the lowest (11.97 g/100 g) crude fibre content on dry weight basis. Adetuya [22] reported that the fiber content of Okra pod ranges from 10.15 - 11.63 g/100 g which is lower than the crude fibre obtained in this study. Adetuya [22] also reported that the fiber content of okra is high when compared with Amarantus hybridus (1.6 g/100 g) and Laurea taraxifolia (2.0 g/100 g) but very low in comparism with Gnetumn africanum (3.0 g/100 g). In this study, the fibre content is relatively high which may suggest that consumption of okra will can improve its digestibility and absorption processes in large intestine, helping to stimulate peristalsis, thereby preventing constipation [40]. Interest in fibre evaluation has increased due to the recent information on the potential role of dietary fibre in human nutrition [46]. Evidences from epidemiological studies suggest that high fibre consumption may contribute to a reduction in the incidence of certain diseases like diabetes, coronary heart disease, colon cancer, high blood pressure, obesity and various digestive disorders [47]. Dietary fibre is known to alter the coronary environment in such a way as to protect against colorectal diseases [48]. It provides protection by increasing faecal bulk, which dilutes the increased colonic bile that occurs with high fat diet [49]. When found in excess, it may bind some essential trace elements leading to deficiency of some minerals such as iron and zinc [33]. Therefore okra pod diet is considered as a main source of crude fibre.

Crude ash: The ash content is a measure/ reflection of the nutritionally important mineral contents present in the food material [50,51]. Table 1 shows the crude ash contents of the eight accessions of Okra pod used in the study. The level of ash content was ranged from 5.37 g/100 g (OPA#4) to 11.30 g/100 g (OPA#6). The ash content was significantly (P<0.05) higher in ‘OPA#6’ (11.30 g/100 g) followed by ‘OPA#3’ (10.20 g/100 g), ‘OPA#2’ (6.66 g/100 g), and ‘OPA#8’ (6.39 g/100 g) in that order while accession ‘OPA#4’ had the lowest (5.37 g/100 g) ash content value but this did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from accession ‘OPA#7’ (5.62 g/100 g) and ‘OPA#1’ (6.05 g/100 g) on dry weight basis. The results showed that the sample contains high ash content which indicates that the okra pods would provide essential valuable and useful minerals needed for body development. The mean of ash content in this result agrees with the findings of Adetuya [22] (7.19 – 9.63 g/100 g).

Utilized carbohydrate: Table 1 shows the utilized carbohydrate contents of the eight accessions of Okra pod used in the study. Utilizable carbohydrate content was determined by difference. The utilized carbohydrate content of Okra pod accessions varied from 56.42 g/100 g to 69.92 g/100 g in ‘OPA#3’ and ‘OPA#1’ accessions, respectively. Utilizable carbohydrate content of pod accession ‘OPA#1’ had higher (69.92 g/100 g), but this did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#2’ (67.89 g/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#3’ had the lowest (56.42 g/100 g) but this did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#8’ (56.52 g/100 g) and ‘OPA#5’ (56.54 g/100 g) utilizable carbohydrate contents. The sample could be considered as potential source of carbohydrate when compared to the content of some conventional sources like cereals with 72-90 g/100 g Carbohydrate [52].

Gross energy: The gross energy was calculated by multiplying the mean values of crude proteins, crude fat and total carbohydrate by Atwater factors of 4, 9 and 4, respectively. Gross energy content was ranged from 257.50 kcal/100 g in ‘OPA#8’ to 319.39 kcal/100 g in ‘OPA#6’ accessions. Gross energy content of pod accession ‘OPA#6’ had higher (319.39 kcal/100 g) but did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#1’ (316.46 kcal/100 g) and ‘OPA#2’ (313.18 kcal/100 g) and was followed by ‘OPA#4’ (289.58 kcal/100 g), ‘OPA#3’ (276.89 kcal/100 g) but this did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#7’ (274.50 kcal/100 g) and ‘OPA#5’ (273.62 kcal/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#8’ had the lowest (257.50 kcal/100 g). This energy value indicates that these accessions can serve as a good source of energy for the body.

Mineral composition

Minerals are considered to be essential in human nutrition [53,54]. These minerals are vital for the overall mental and physical well-being and are important constituents of bones, teeth, tissues, muscles, blood and nerve cells [55]. They also help in the maintenance of acid-base balance, response of nerves to physiological stimulation and blood clotting [56]. The mineral composition of eight Okra pod accessions are shown in Table 2.

Accessions Mineral Content (mg/100g)
Calcium Iron Potassium Zinc Phosphorous Sodium
OPA#1 111.11 ± 0.37g 25.41 ± 1.36 169.82 ± 8.25c 4.13 ± 0.04d,e 33.02 ± 0.46e 5.01 ± 0.54b,c
OPA#2 276.29 ± 0.96b 20.98 ± 0.75de 318.20 ± 6.67a 4.61 ± 0.01c 42.17 ± 0.78c 8.31 ± 0.51a
OPA#3 311.95 ± 0.57a 31.77 ± 0.37b 177.96 ± 2.89c 6.30 ± 0.09a 27.61 ± 0.91f 3.97 ± 0.56b,c
OPA#4 140.88 ± 1.39f 23.30 ± 0.48d 277.82 ± 9.62b 4.16 ± 0.09c,d,e 54.11 ± 1.62b 5.61 ± 1.13b,c
OPA#5 253.52 ± 4.02c 36.68 ± 0.84a 122.59 ± 11.00d 3.83 ± 0.24e 59.72 ± 0.55a 3.91 ± 0.57b,c
OPA#6 311.35 ± 0.27a 32.90 ± 2.65a,b 263.12 ± 1.06b 6.31 ± 0.19a 36.32 ± 0.68d 6.06 ± 0.57a,b
OPA#7 188.79 ± 3.30e 18.30 ± 0.18e 183.52 ± 7.79c 5.65 ± 0.05b 25.62 ± 0.83f 4.99 ± 0.57b,c
OPA#8 203.89 ± 1.08d 28.49 ± 1.77b,c 174.04 ± 2.75c 4.35 ± 0.19c,d 58.48 ± 1.21a 3.33 ± 1.11c

Means not followed by the same superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of replicate determinations (n=2)
NB. OPA stands for Okra Pod Accession and # stands for number.

Table 2: Mineral Concentrations of eight Okra pod accessions (dry weight bases).

Calcium: Calcium is the major component of bone and assists in teeth development. Calcium concentrations are also necessary for blood coagulation and for the integrity of intracellular cement substances [57]. Calcium content in the eight Okra pod accessions are shown in Table 2. The concentration of Calcium in the sample is varied from 111.11 mg/100 g to 311.95 mg/100 g in ‘OPA#1’ and ‘OPA#3’ accessions, respectively. Okra pod accession ‘OPA#3’ had the highest calcium content (311.95 mg/100 g) which was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the Calcium content of all the accessions except accession ‘OPA#6’ (311.35 mg/100 g) whereas Okra pod accession ‘OPA#1’ had the lowest Calcium content (11.11 mg/100 g) on dry weight basis. This result appeared to be far higher than the Calcium contents of Okra variety reported by Adetuya [22] varying between 58.22 mg/100 g to 58.31 mg/100 g.

Iron: Iron is an essential trace element for hemoglobin format on, normal functioning of central nervous system and in the oxidation of carbohydrates, protein and fats [58,59]. It also facilitates carbohydrates, protein and fat to control body weight, which is very important factor in diabetes [60]. Iron is necessary for the formation of hemoglobin and also plays an important role in oxygen transfer in human body and low iron content causes gastrointestinal infection, nose bleeding myocardial infection [61]. Table 2 shows Iron content of the eight accessions of Okra pod used in the study. The contents of Iron varied from 18.30 mg/100 g in ‘OPA#7’ to 36.68 mg/100 g in ‘OPA#5’. The Iron content of Okra pod accession ‘OPA#5’ had higher (36.68 mg/100 g) but this did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from accession ‘OPA#6’ (32.90 mg/100 g) whereas accession ‘OPA#7’ had the lowest (18.30 mg/100 g) but non-significant (P<0.05) from accession ‘OPA#2’ (20.98 mg/100 g) on dry weight basis. The values obtained in this study were far higher than the value reported by Adetuya [22] which is varied from 0.87 mg/100 g to 0.96 mg/100 g. This indicates that Okra pod is a rich source of Iron.

Zinc: Zinc is an essential trace element and plays an important role in various cell processes including normal growth, brain development, behavioral response, bone formation and wound healing [58]. Zinc also plays a very important role in protein and carbohydrate metabolism and also help in mobilizing vitamin A from its storage site in the liver and facilitates the synthesis of DNA and RNA necessary for cell production [62]. Zinc deficiency is common in people suffering from Chrohn’s disease, hypothyroidism and gum disease, and probably plays a part in susceptibility to viral infections and diabetes mellitus. It can be beneficial in the treatment of viral infections, including those of AIDS, prostate gland enlargement, rheumatoid arthritis, healing of wounds, acne, eczema and stress [59]. Zinc content in the eight Okra pod accessions were shown in Table 2. The content of Zinc varied between 3.83 mg/100 g in ‘OPA#5 and 6.31 mg/100 g in ‘OPA#6’. Zinc content of pod accession ‘OPA#6’ had higher (6.31 mg/100 g) but this did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#3’ (6.30 mg/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#5’ had the lowest (3.83 mg/100 g) but this did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from Okra pod accession ‘OPA#1’ (4.13 mg/100 g) and ‘OPA#4’ (4.16 mg/100 g) on dry weight basis. The values obtained in this study are higher than the values reported by Adetuya [22] (1.29 mg/100 g -1.37 mg/100 g).

Phosphorus: Phosphorus content of the accessions of eight Okra pod were shown in Table 2. In this study, the phosphorus content is varied from 25.62 mg/100 g (OPA#7) to 59.72 mg/100 g (OPA#5). The Phosphorus content of pod accession ‘OPA#5’ had higher (59.72 mg/100 g) but did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#8’ (58.48 mg/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#7’ had the lowest (25.62 mg/100 g) but did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from Okra pod accession ‘OPA#3’ (27.61 mg/100 g) on dry weight basis. The value of this study is lower than the value reported by Adetuya [22] which is varied from 60.05 mg/100 g to 62.17 mg/100 g.

Potassium: Potassium content of the accessions of eight Okra pod were shown in Table 2. The Potassium content of pod accession ‘OPA#2’ had significantly (P<0.05) higher (318.20 mg/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#5’ had the lowest (122.59 mg/100 g) on dry weight basis. High amount of potassium in the body was reported to increase iron utilization [52] and beneficial to people taking diuretics to control hypertension and suffer from excessive excretion of potassium through the body fluid [63].

Sodium: Sodium content of the accessions of eight Okra pod were shown in Table 2. In this study, the sodium content is varied from 3.33 mg/100 g (OPA#8) to 8.31 mg/100 g (OPA#2). Sodium content of Okra pod accession ‘OPA#2’ had higher (8.31 mg/100 g) but this did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#6’ (6.06 mg/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#8’ had the lowest (3.33 mg/100 g) but this did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from all the five remaining accessions on dry weight basis.

Antinutritional factors

Anti-nutritional factors are a chemical compounds synthesized in natural food and/ or feedstuffs by the normal metabolism of species which exerts effect contrary to optimum nutrition [21]. Anti-nutritional factors are also reduce the maximum utilization of nutrients especially proteins, vitamins, and minerals, thus preventing optimal exploitation of the nutrients present in a food and decreasing the nutritive value [64,65]. The antinutritional composition of eight Okra pods accessions are shown in Table 3.

Accessions Phytate (mg/100g) Oxalate (mg/100g) Tannin (mg/100g)
OPA#1 0.85 ± 0.01a 0.04 ± 0.04e 7.61 ± 0.55b,c
OPA#2 0.85 ± 0.01a 0.53 ± 0.53a 6.75 ± 0.32c,d
OPA#3 0.87 ± 0.02a 0.09 ± 0.09c,d 5.75 ± 0.38d,e
OPA#4 0.83 ± 0.02a 0.15 ± 0.15c 8.12 ± 0.38b
OPA#5 0.83 ± 0.01a 0.06 ± 0.06e 7.48 ± 0.33b,c
OPA#6 0.85 ± 0.02a 0.28 ± 0.28b 9.70 ± 0.41a
OPA#7 0.84 ± 0.01a 0.47 ± 0.47a 4.93 ± 0.15e
OPA#8 0.86 ± 0.03a 0.12 ± 0.12c,d 9.90 ± 0.46a

Means not followed by the same superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of replicate determinations (n=2)
NB. OPA stands for Okra Pod Accession and # stands for number.

Table 3: Antinutritional factors content of the accessions of eight Okra pod (dry weight bases).

Phytate: The phytate content of Okra pod accession was highest in ‘OPA#3’ (0.87 mg/100 g) and lowest in ‘OPA#5’ and ‘OPA#4’ (0.83 mg/100 g) whereas value of Okra pod accession ‘OPA#3’ was nonsignificant (P<0.05) from phytate content of the remaining accessions on dry weight bases. The problem with phytate in food is that it can bind some essential mineral nutrients in the digestive tract and can result in mineral deficiencies [66]. The phytate composition of the sample might not pose any health hazard when compared to a phytate diet of 10-60 mg/100 g which if consumed over a long period of time that has been reported to decrease bioavailability of minerals [52]. On the other hand, currently there is evidence that dietary phytate at low level may have beneficial role as an antioxidant, anticarcinogens and likely play an important role in controlling hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis [67]. The result of this study is lower than the value reported by Adetuya [22] (2.64-3.90 mg/100 g). Because Okra pod may provide a substantial portion of phytate, the health benefits of phytate in Okra pod should be investigated.

Tannin: Tannin content of pod accession ‘OPA#8’ (9.90 mg/100 g) had higher but did not differ significantly from accession ‘OPA#6’ (9.70 mg/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#7’ (4.93 mg/100 g) had the lowest but did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from Okra pod accession ‘OPA#3’ (5.74 mg/100 g) on dry weight basis. Tannins had been reported to affect protein digestibility, adversely influencing the bioavailability of non-haem iron leading to poor iron and calcium absorption, also carbohydrate is affected leading to reduced energy value of a diet containing tannins [68] however its antinutritional/ toxicity effects depend upon their chemical structure and dosage [65]. Therefore, the toxicity effects of the tannin may not be significant since the total acceptable tannic acid daily intake for a man is 560 mg/100 g [65]. Since the tannin content of Okra pod accessions are very low compared to its critical toxicity effect and further reduced during traditional processing, its antinutritional effect may be insignificant in both raw and processed Okra pod.

Oxalate: Oxalate content of pod accession ‘OPA#2’ (0.53 mg/100 g) had higher but this did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from accession ‘OPA#7’(0.47 mg/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#1’ (0.04 mg/100 g) had the lowest but did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from Okra pod accession ‘OPA#5’ (0.06 mg/100 g), ‘OPA#3’ (0.09 mg/100 g) and ‘OPA#8’ (0.12 mg/100 g) on dry weight basis. The result of this study is comparable with the finding of Adetuya [22] (0.32-0.506 mg/100 g). Oxalates can have a harmful effect on human nutrition and health, especially by reducing calcium absorption and aiding the formation of kidney stones [65]. High-oxalate diets can increase the risk of renal calcium oxalate formation in certain groups of people [21]. The majority of urinary stones formed in humans are calcium oxalate stones and currently, patients are advised to limit their intake of foods with a total intake of oxalate not exceeding 50–60 mg per day [69]. The traditionally processed Anchote tubers analyzed in this study are low compared to the recommendations for patients with calcium oxalate kidney stones. Under these guidelines, processed Anchote tubers analyzed could be recommended not only for normal healthy people but also consumption for patients with a history of calcium oxalate kidney stones, assume about 1 kg of Anchote would be necessary for consumption per day.

Molar ratios and bioavailability of minerals

The molar ratios for oxalate, calcium, zinc, Iron and phytate were calculated to evaluate the effects of elevated levels of oxalate and phytate in the bioavailability of dietary minerals. Bioavailability is the ability of the body to digest and absorb the mineral in the food consumed [65]. The calculated values are also compared with the reported critical toxicity values for these ratios. The calculated Ca: Phy, Ox: Ca, Phy: Zn, Phy: Fe and [Ca] [Phy]/ [Zn] molar ratios of Okra pod accessions are shown in Table 4.

Accessions Phytate : Ca
(Molar ratio)
Phytate : Fe
(Molar ratio)
Phytate: Zn
(Molar ratio)
Oxalate: Ca
(Molar ratio)
Phytate*Ca: Zn
(mol/kg)
OPA#1 0.0047 ± 0.050a 0.0028 ± 0.012c,d 0.0204 ± 0.044a,b 0.0016 ± 0.0405e,f 0.0565 ± 0.0014c
OPA#2 0.0019 ± 0.007d,e 0.0034 ± 0.010b 0.0182 ± 0.013b 0.0087 ± 0.0775b 0.1252 ± 0.0013a
OPA#3 0.0017 ± 0.050e 0.0023 ± 0.001e,f 0.0136 ± 0.038c 0.0013 ± 0.0145e,f 0.1059 ± 0.0001b
OPA#4 0.0036 ± 0.170b 0.0030 ± 0.001b,c 0.0198 ± 0.092a,b 0.0049 ± 0.0695c 0.0694 ± 0.0025c
OPA#5 0.0010 ± 0.078d 0.0019 ± 0.007f 0.0216 ± 0.016a 0.0010 ± 0.0255f 0.1363 ± 0.0079a
OPA#6 0.0017 ± 0.057e 0.0022 ± 0.023f 0.0134 ± 0.087c 0.0040 ± 0.0220c,d 0.1037 ± 0.0008b
OPA#7 0.0027 ± 0.021c 0.0039 ± 0.008a 0.0147 ± 0.004c 0.0011 ± 0.0525a 0.0693 ± 0.0014c
OPA#8 0.0026 ± 0.120c 0.0026 ± 0.023d,e 0.0195 ± 0.014a,b 0.0027 ± 0.0460d,e 0.0994 ± 0.0066b

Means not followed by the same superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).

Table 4: Calculated Molar ratio Ca:Phy, Ox:Ca, Phy:Zn, Phy:Fe and [Ca][Phy]/[Zn] molar ratios of Okra pod accessions.

[Phytate]/ [Calcium] molar ratios: Phytic acids markedly decrease Ca bioavailability and the Ca:Phy molar ratio has been proposed as an indicator of Ca bioavailability. The critical molar ratio of [phy]: [Ca] of < 0.24 indicating good calcium bioavailability [30]. The values in the present study were lower in all accessions than the reported critical molar ratio of Phytate to Calcium, indicating that absorption of calcium not adversely affected by phytate in all the accessions.

Phytate]/[Iron] molar ratios: Phytate begins to lose its inhibitory effect on iron absorption when phytate:iron molar ratios are less than 1.0, although even ratios as low as 0.2 exert some negative effect [70]. The phytate:iron molar ratios greater than 0.15 regarded as indicative of poor iron bioavailability [71]. This result indicated that, the phytate:iron molar ratios of all the accessions are less than the critical value, which implies the absorption of iron all the accessions not inhibited by phytate and as a result the bioavailability of iron is good.

[Phytate]/ [Zinc] molar ratios: The importance of foodstuffs as a source of dietary zinc depends on both the total zinc content and the level of other constituents in the diet that affect zinc bioavailability. Phytate may reduce the bioavailabity of dietary zinc by forming insoluble mineral chelates at a physiological pH [72] and the formation of the chelates depends on relative levels of both zinc and phytic acid. Hence, the phytate: Zn molar ratio is considered a better indicator of zinc bioavailability than total dietary phytate levels alone [30].

Therefore, the foods with a molar ratio of Phy: Zn less than 10 showed adequate availability of Zn and problems were encountered when the value was greater than 15. Phytate: zinc molar ratios >15, indicative of poor zinc bioavailability [73]. The values of Okra pod accessions were lower than the critical molar ratios of Phy:Zn, which indicates the availability of zinc good.

[Oxalate]/ [Calcium] molar ratios: Oxalic acid and its salts can have deleterious effects on human nutrition and health, particularly by decreasing calcium absorption and aiding the formation of kidney stones [72]. The importance of oxalate contents of an individual plant product in limiting total dietary Ca availability is of significance only when the ratio of Ox:Ca is greater than one [74]. From the result, it was observed that, all Okra pod accessions had Ox:Ca values are lower than the reported critical value (1.0), which implies that a low level of oxalate could have no adverse effects on bioavailability of dietary calcium in these accessions.

[Phytate][Calcium]/[Zinc] molar ratios: The potentiating effect of calcium on zinc absorption in the presence of high phytate intakes has led to the suggestion that the [Phy][Ca]/[Zn] millimolar ratio may be a better index of zinc bioavailability than the [Phy]/[Zn] molar ratio alone [75]. High calcium levels in foods can promote the phytateinduced decrease in zinc bioavailability when the [Ca][phytate]/[Zn] millimolar ratio exceeds 0.5 mol/kg [22]. In this study, the values of [Ca][Phy]/ [Zn] millimolar ratios of all the accessions were found less than the critical level.

Phytate phosphorus and non-phytate phosphorus

The percentage of phytate phosphorus to total phosphorus is very important since the phytate phosphorus cannot be utilized by human beings. The phytate phosphorus and non-phytate phosphorus content of Okra pod accessions are shown in Table 5. The phytate phosphorus content of Okra pod accession was highest in ‘OPA#3’ (0.242 mg/100 g) and lowest in ‘OPA#4’ (0.233 mg/100 g) but this did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from all the rest of accessions. The non phytate phosphorus of pod accession ‘OPA#5’ (59.487 mg/100 g) had higher but this did not differ significantly(P<0.05) from accession ‘OPA#8’ (58.241 mg/100 g) while accession ‘OPA#7’ (25.385 mg/100 g) had the lowest but this also did not differ significantly (P<0.05) from Okra pod accession ‘OPA#3’ (27.368 mg/100 g).

Accessions 1Phytate phosphorus(mg/100g) 2Non-phytate phosphorus(mg/100g) 3Proportion of phosphorous as phytate (%)
OPA#1 0.238 ± 0.003a 32.782 ± 0.883e 7.22 ± 0.28b
OPA#2 0.237 ± .001a 41.933 ± 0.842c 5.62 ± 0.15c
OPA#3 0.242 ± .004a 27.368 ± 1.220f 8.78 ± 0.38a
OPA#4 0.233 ± .006a 53.877 ± 0.001b 4.30 ± 0.00d
OPA#5 0.233 ± .003a 59.487 ± 1.270a 3.89 ± 0.04d
OPA#6 0.238 ± .006a 36.082 ± 0.053d 6.57 ± 0.39b
OPA#7 0.235 ± .003a 25.385 ± 1.460f 9.18 ± 0.13a
OPA#8 0.239 ± .007a 58.241 ± 0.041a 4.10 ± 0.22d

Means not followed by the same superscript letters in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
1Phytate phosphorus was calculated by phytate times 28.18%.
2Non-phytate phosphorus was the difference between phytate phosphorus and total phosphorus.
3Proportion of phosphorous as phytate was calculated by phytate phosphorus devided by total phosphorus.

Table 5: Phytate phosphorus and non-phytate phosphorus Contents of Okra pod accession samples.

The percentage of phytate phosphorus to total phosphorus is very important since the phytate phosphorus cannot be utilized by human beings. The effect of phytate on phosphrus absorption in the presence of high phytate intakes has led to the suggestion that the proportion of phosphorus as phytate may be a better index of phosphrus bioavailability, in which the diets with proportion of phosphorus as phytate (%) ≤ 50 % in foods are regarded as being adequate in bioavailable phosphate. The values in this study were lower than the reported critical proportion of phosphors as phytate, which implies the Okra pod accessions are adequately bioavailable the phosphors element. Therefore, consumptions of Okra pod may help to ameliorate prevalent mineral deficiencies caused by their limited bioavailability and may lead to better mineral status.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the study revealed that there is a significant difference (P<0.05) in the proximate and mineral compositions of Okra pod accessions. The most remarkable finding of the present study is that Okra pod accessions were found to be a good source of vital nutrients like crude protein, crude fibre, Crude ash, calcium and iron. Specifically, Okra pod of ‘OPA#6’ accession contained significantly higher amounts of crude protein, total ash, crude fat, gross energy, calcium, iron and zinc than all other accessions and can be recommended as a remedy to alleviate malnutrition in the country. Interestingly, the anti-nutritional contents of the Okra pods were low and the bioavailability of calcium, iron and zinc were high and and therefore, its cultivation and consumption is encouraged as additional source of minerals to the diet of the indigenous people. Therefore, Okra pods could be employed in fortification, formulation and supplementation of other food materials.

References

  1. Nesamvuni C, Steyn NP, Potgieter MJ (2001) Nutritional value of wild, leafy plants consumed by the Vhavenda. S Afr J Sci 97: 51-54.
  2. Yang RY, Keding GB (2009) Nutritional contributions of important African indigenous vegetables. In: African indigenous vegetables in urban agriculture. London, Earthscan, pp: 105-143.
  3. Hilou A, Nacoulma OG, Guiguemde TR (2006) In vivo antimalarial activities of extracts from Amaranthus spinosus L. and Boerhaavia erecta L. in mice.  J Ethnopharmacol 103: 236-240.
  4. Yiridoe EK, Anchirinah VM (2005) Garden production systems and food security in Ghana: Characteristics of traditional knowledge and management systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 20: 168-180.
  5. Zhao H, Lin J, Grossman HB, Hernandez LM, Dinney CP, et al. (2007) Dietary isothiocyanates, GSTM1, GSTT1, NAT2 polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk.  Int J Cancer 120: 2208-2213.
  6. Tchientche KR, Kouamé C, Atangana AR, Chagomoka T, Ndango RA (2013) Nutritional Evaluation of Five African Indigenous Vegetables. Journal of Horticultural Research 21: 99-106.
  7. Oyelade OJ, Ade-Omowaye BIO, Adeomi VF (2003) Influence of variety on protein, fat contents and some physical characteristics of okra seeds. J Food Eng 57: 111-114.
  8. Andras CD, Simandi B, Orsi F, Lambrou C, Tatla DM, et al. (2005) Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Okra (Hibiscus esculentus L.) seeds. J Sci Food Agric 85: 1415-1419.
  9. Saifullah M, Rabbani MG (2009) Evaluation and characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.) genotypes. SAARC J Agric 7: 92-99.
  10. Simmone EH, Hochmuth GJ, Maynard DN, Vavrina CS, Stall WM, et al. (2004) Okra Production in Florida. Horticultural Sciences Department document HS729. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
  11. Sathish D, Eswar A (2013) A Review on: Abelmoschus esculentus (Okra). Int Res J Pharm App Sci3:129-132.
  12. Getachew O (2001) Food source diversification:Potential to ameliorate the chronic food insecurity in Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the Potential of Indigenous Wild Foods. Workshop proceedings, 22-26 January 2001.Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  13. Dandena G, (2010) Shifting to alternative food source: potential to overcome ethiopias' malnutrition and poverty problems. emilie coudel, hubert devautour, christophe-toussaint soulard, bernard hubert. montpellier, france. Cirad-Inra-SupAgro, 10 p.
  14. Naveed A, Khan AA, Khan IA (2009) Generation mean analysis of water stress tolerance in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Pak J Bot 41: 195-205.
  15. Nzikou JM, Mioula-Tsieri M, Matouba E, Ouamba JM, Kapser C, et al. (2006) Study on Gumbo Seed Grown in Congo Brazzaville for its Food andIndustrial Applications. AJB 5:2469-2475.
  16. Ndunguru J, Rajabu A (2004) Effect of okra mosaic virus disease on the above-ground morphological yield components of okra in Tanzania. Scientia Horticulturae 99: 225-235.
  17. Sorapong Benchasr (2012) Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus(L.) Moench) as a Valuable Vegetable of the World. Ratar Povrt 49:105-112.
  18. Gemede HF, Ratta N, Haki GD, Woldegiorgis AZ, Beyene F (2015) Nutritional Quality and Health Benefits of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus): A Review. J Food Process Technol 6: 458.
  19. Benjawan C, Chutichudet P, Kaewsit S (2007) Effects of green manures on growth, yield and quality of green okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) Har Lium Cultivar.  Pak J Biol Sci 10: 1028-1035.
  20. Arapitsas P (2008) Identification and quantification of polyphenolic compounds from okra seeds and skins.  Food Chem 110: 1041-1045.
  21. Habtamu FG, Negussie R (2014) Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects. IJNFS 3: 284-289.
  22. Adetuyi FO, Osagie AU, Adekunle AT (2011) Nutrient, antinutrient, mineral and bioavailability of okra Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench. Am J Food Nutr 1:49-54.
  23. Kathirvel P, Kumudha P (2011) Chemical Composition of Prosopis Juliflora (SW.) D.C (Mosquito Bean). IJABPT 2:4.
  24. AOAC (2000) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Washington, DC, USA.
  25. Manzi P, Marconi S, Aguzzi A, Pizzoferrato L (2004) Commercial mushrooms: nutritional quality and effect of cooking. Food Chemistry 84: 201-206.
  26. Guyot JP, Rochette I, Treche S, (2007) Effect of fermentation by amylolytic lactic acid bacteria, in process combinations, on characteristics of rice/soybean slurries: A new method for preparing high energy density complementary foods for young children. Food Chemistry 100: 623-63.
  27. Vaintraub IA, Lapteva NA (1988) Colorimetric determination of phytate in unpurified extracts of seeds and the products of their processing.  Anal Biochem 175: 227-230.
  28. Ukpabi VJ, Ejidoh JI (1989) Effect of deep out frying on the oxalate content and the degree of itching of cocoyams. (Xanthosoma and colocassia spp). Technical paper presented at the 5th annual conference of the Agriculture society of Nigeria. Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria, 3-6 (September).
  29. Maxson ED, Rooney LW (1972) Evaluation of methods for tannin analysis in sorghum grain. Cereal Chem. 49: 719-729.
  30. Woldegiorgis AZ, Abate D, Haki GD, Ziegler GR (2014) Antioxidant property of edible mushrooms collected from Ethiopia.  Food Chem 157: 30-36.
  31. Omoruyi FO, Dilworth L, Asemota HN (2007) Anti-nutritional factors, Iron and Calcium in some caribbean tuber crops and the effect of boiling or roasting. Nutrition and food science 37: 8 - 15.
  32. Onwuka GI (2005) Food analysis and instrumentation, proximate composition of food minerals 1st Edition. Naplithali print, a Division of H.G. support Nigerian Ltd, Nigeria, 64: 81-114.
  33. Ekwumemgbo PA, Sallau MS, Omoniyi KI, Zubairu SY (2014) Proximate and Anti-nutritional Constituents of Abelmoschus esculentus Grown in Fadaman Kubanni, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports 3: 2015-2027.
  34. Aja PM, Offor CE, Orji OU (2015) Proximate and Antinutrient Compositions of Parkia biglobosa Fruits in Abakaliki, Ebonyi state, Nigeria. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4: 394-398.
  35. Gopalan C, Sastri SBV, Balasubramanian S (2007) Nutritive value of Indian foods, National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), ICMR, India.
  36. Emmanuel CN, Nulit R,Rusea GO (2014) Nutritional and biochemical properties of Malaysian okra variety. Advancement in Medicinal Plant Research 2: 16-19.
  37. Edak AU, Effiom EI, Godson EN (2013) Evaluation of the chemical composition of Tetrapleura tetraptera (Schum and Thonn.) Tuab. Accessions from Cross River State, Nigeria. Int J Med Arom Plants 3: 386-394.
  38. Nwofia GE, Nwogu VN, Nwofia BK (2012) Nutritional Variation in Fruits and Seeds of Pumpkins (Cucurbita Spp)Accessions from Nigeria. PJN 11: 946-956.
  39. Aruah BC, Uguru MI, Oyiga BC (2012) Genetic variability and inter-relationship among some Nigerian pumpkin accessions (Cucurbitaspp). Int J Plant Breeding 6: 34-41.
  40. Ogungbenle HN, Omosola SM (2015) The Comparative Assessment of Nutritive Values of Dry Nigerian Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Fruit and Oil. IJNFS 5: 8-14
  41. Ali A (2010) A comparative study of nutrients and mineral molar ratios of foods with recommended dietary allowances. J Food Sci Technol 2: 104-108.
  42. Effiong GS, Ibia TO, Udofia US (2009) Nutritive and energy values of some wild fruit spices in south eastern Nigeria. Electron. J Environ Agric Food Chem 8: 917-923.
  43. Antia BS, Akpan EJ, Okon PA, Umoren IU (2006) Nutritive and anti-nutritive evaluation of sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) leaves. PJN 5: 166-168.
  44. Aruah BC, Uguru MI, Oyiga BC (2011) Nutritional Evaluation of Some Nigerian Pumpkins (Cucurbita spp.). Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology 5: 64-71.
  45. Dawczynski C, Schubert R, Jahreis G (2007) Amino acids, fatty acids, and dietary fibre in edible seaweed products. Food Chemistry, 103: 891-899.
  46. Mensan JK, Okoli RI, Ohaju-Obodo JO, Eifediyi K (2008) Phytochemical, nutritional and medicinal properties of some leafy vegetables consumed by Edo People of Nigeria. AJB 7:2304-2309.
  47. Ikewuchi CC, Ikewuchi JC (2009) Chemical profile of Pleurotus tuberregium (fr) sing’s sclerotia pacific. JST 10:295-299.
  48. Ekumankama IO (2008) Nutrient composition of indigenous vegetables (Pterocarpus soyanxii, pterocarpus santalinoides and Gnetum africanum). NJNS 29:195-200.
  49. Dillard CJ, German JB (2000) Photochemical nutraceuticals and human health. J Sci Food Agric 80:1744-1756.
  50. Omotoso OT (2006) Nutritional quality, functional properties and anti-nutrient compositions of the larva of Cirina forda (Westwood) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae).  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 7: 51-55.
  51. NnamaniCV, Oselebe HO, Agbautu A (2009) Assessment of nutritional values of three underutilized indigenous leafy vegetables of Ebonyi state, Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 2321-2324.
  52. Elinge CM, Muhammad A, Atiku FA, Itodo AU, Peni IJ et al. (2012) Proximate, Mineral and Anti-nutrient Composition of Pumpkin (Cucurbitapepo L) Seeds Extract. Inter J Plant Research 2: 146-150.
  53. Ibanga OI, Okon DE (2009) Minerals and antinutrients in two varieties of African pear (Dacryodes edulis). J Food Technol 7: 106-110.
  54. Valvi SR, Rathod VS (2011) Mineral Composition of Some Wild Edible Fruits from Kolhapur District. IJABPT.
  55. Soetan KO, Olaiya CO, Oyewole OE (2010) The importance of mineral elements for humans, domesticanimals and plants: A Review. Afr J Food Sci 4: 200-222.
  56. Hanif R, Igbal Z, Igbal M, Hanif S, Rasheed M (2006) Use of vegetables as nutritional food: Role in human health. J Agric Biol Sci 1: 18-20.
  57. Okaka JC, Okaka ANO (2001) Food composition, spoilage and shelf life extension, ocjarc o Acadamic Publishers, Enugu, Nigeria, pp: 54-56.
  58. Mlitan AM, Sasi MS, Alkherraz AM (2014) Proximate and Minor Mineral Content in Some Selected Basil Leaves of Ocimum gratissimum L, in Libya. IJCEA5: 6.
  59. MosesAG, Maobe Gitu EGL, Rotich H (2012) Profile of heavy metals in selected medicinal plants used for the treatment of diabetes, malaria and pneumonia in Kisii region, southwest Kenya. Global J Pharmacol 6: 245-251.
  60. Ullah RJA, Khader I, Hussain NM, Talha AM, Khan N (2012) Investigation of macro and micronutrients in selected medicinal plants. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 69: 1829-1832.
  61. Jabeen S, Shah MT, Khan S, Hayat MQ (2010) The typical symptoms of determination of major and trace elements in ten important folk therapeutic plants of Haripur Basin. Pak J Med Plants Res, 4: 559-566.
  62. Arinathan V, Mohan VR, John De Britto A (2003) Chemical composition of certain tribal pulses in South India.  Int J Food Sci Nutr 54: 209-217.
  63. Ugwu FM, Oranye NA (2006) Effects of some processing methods on the toxic components ofAfrican breadfruit (Treculia qfricana). AJB 5: 2329-2333.
  64. Fekadu H, Beyene F, Desse G (2013) Effect of Traditional Processing Methods on Nutritional Composition and Anti-nutritional Factors of Anchote (Coccinia Abyssinica(lam.) Cogn) Tubers Grown in Western Ethiopia. J Food Process Technol 4: 249.
  65. Bello MO, Farade OS, Adewusi SRA, Olawore NO (2008) Studies of Some Lesser Known Nigerian Fruits. AJB 7: 3972-3979.
  66. Phillippy BQ, Lin M, RascoB (2004) Analysis of phytate in raw and cooked potatoes, JFCA 17: 217-226.
  67. Adeparusi EO (2001) Effect of processing on the nutrients and anti-nutrients of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) flour.  Nahrung 45: 94-96.
  68. Massey LK, Palmer RG, Horner HT (2001) Oxalate content of soybean seeds (Glycine max: Leguminosae), soyfoods, and other edible legumes.  J Agric Food Chem 49: 4262-4266.
  69. Hurrell RF, Juillerat MA, Reddy MB, Lynch SR, Dassenko SA, et al. (1992) Soy protein, phytate, and iron absorption in humans.  Am J Clin Nutr 56: 573-578.
  70. Siegenberg D, Baynes RD, Bothwell TH, Macfarlane BJ, Lamparelli RD, et al. (1991) Ascorbic acid prevents the dose-dependent inhibitory effects of polyphenols and phytates on nonheme-iron absorption.  Am J Clin Nutr 53: 537-541.
  71. Bhandari MR, Kawabata J (2004) Assessment of anti-nutritional factors and bioavailability of calcium and in wild yam(Dioscorea spp.) tubers of Nepal. Food Chemistry 85: 281-287.
  72. Morris ER, Ellis R (1989) Usefulness of the dietary phytic acid/zinc molar ratio as an index of zinc bioavailability to rats and humans.  Biol Trace Elem Res 19: 107-117.
  73. Frontela C, Scarino ML, Ferruzza S, Ros G, Martínez C (2009) Effect of dephytinization on bioavailability of iron, calcium and zinc from infant cereals assessed in the Caco-2 cell model.  World J Gastroenterol 15: 1977-1984.
  74. Obah G, Amusan TV (2009) Nutritive value and antioxidant properties of cereal gruels produced from fermented maize and sorghum. Food Biotechnol 23: 17-31.
  75. Melaku U, West CE, Habtamu F (2005) Content of, iron, calcium and their absorption inhibitors in foods commonly consumed in Ethiopia. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 18, 803-817.
Citation: Gemede HF, Haki GD, Beyene F, Woldegiorgis AZ, Rakshit SK (2015) Proximate, Mineral and Antinutrient Compositions of Indigenous Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Pod Accessions: Implications for Mineral Bioavailability. J Nutr Food Sci S3:003.

Copyright: © 2015 Gemede HF, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top