Anesthesia & Clinical Research
Open Access
ISSN: 2155-6148
+44 1223 790975
ISSN: 2155-6148
+44 1223 790975
Carl-Johan Jakobsen
8200 Aarhus N
Denmark
Research Article
Hemodynamic Consequences of Two Different Surgical and Anesthetic Techniques for the Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis - A Randomized Comparison
Author(s): Pia Katarina Ryhammer, Jacob Greisen, Kim Terp, Linda Aagaard Rasmussen, Vibeke E Hjortdal and Carl-Johan JakobsenPia Katarina Ryhammer, Jacob Greisen, Kim Terp, Linda Aagaard Rasmussen, Vibeke E Hjortdal and Carl-Johan Jakobsen
There are two substantially different methods of doing aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: The trans-apical aortic valve replacement (TAVI) and the standard surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The impact of surgery as well as anesthesia has great influence on perioperative hemodynamics. We compared the perioperative hemodynamic variables in comparable groups of patients going through either of these procedures. Methods: The present study is a subset of the STACATO trial, which was a multicenter trial with the objective of comparing the two treatment methods in patients with significant valvular aortic stenosis who were eligible for either procedure. This study analyses hemodynamic data as well as arterial blood gases and s-creatinine from the 58 randomized patients in our institution. Results: Patients in the SAVR group had lower value.. View More»
DOI:
10.4172/2155-6148.1000594