GET THE APP

Simultaneous Determination of Ammonium Ion, MDEA, Common Metal Cations and Dialkyl Amines in Amine Processing Solution by Ion Chromatography
Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques

Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques
Open Access

ISSN: 2157-7064

Research Article - (2018) Volume 9, Issue 6

Simultaneous Determination of Ammonium Ion, MDEA, Common Metal Cations and Dialkyl Amines in Amine Processing Solution by Ion Chromatography

Ravindra Singh1*, Mohammad Ali Khan2, Anil Yadav1, Anju Chopra1 and Kagdiyal V1
1Research and Development Centre, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Sector-13, Faridabad, Haryana, India
2Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
*Corresponding Author: Ravindra Singh, Research and Development Centre, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Sector-13, Faridabad, Haryana, India, Tel: +917838856379 Email:

Abstract

In the present study a new method has been developed for the separation and estimation of common metal cations (Li+, Na+, K+), Methyl diethanolamine (MDEA) (and types of alkyl amines) and their degradation products including ammonium ion used in amine processing solution. The acid treating amines such as dimethyl amine (DMA), Diethyl amine (DEA), Dipropylamine (DPA), Diisopropyl amine (DPA) and Dibutyl amine (DBA) in amine processing solution have been separated by Ion Chromatography (IC) using conductivity detector in single column mode. Desired separation was achieved within 20 min using mixture of 3 mM CH3SO3H+CH3CN (90:10) as mobile phase on Dionex Ion Pac SCS1 column at temperature of 30°C. Calibration curve for all the cations (Li+, Na+, K+, NH4+) in the concentration range of 2.5-20 ppm and 3-100 ppm for dialkyl amine were plotted and it was observed that the correlation coefficient (R2) list in between 0.9980 and 1.0. Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) observed for all the abovementioned cations were in the range of 0.81-2.33%. Recovery of all the cations at different concentrations of amine processing matrix was in the range of 80-120%. The lower Limit of Detection (LOD) for Li+, Na+, K+, NH4+ was 0.5 ppm, and for MDEA and all above alkyl amines was 1.0 ppm. The operational simplicity of this method in terms of accuracy and precision can be a good alternative for the estimation of above ions in amine processing solution.

Keywords: Ion chromatography (IC); Metal cation; Dialkylamine; Lean amine; Conductivity detector

Introduction

Ion Exchange Chromatography (IEC) has been in used for over half a century [1,2]. The application of chromatography for inorganic substances was mainly conducted during Manhatten project during the World War II for the construction of atomic bomb. IEC was originally described by Small et al. [3,4] in 1975 as a new technique for the characterization of a variety of solutions and their respective anions and cations. Since 1975, there have been steady developments and refinements in Ion Chromatography (IC) that has led to improved speed of separation, ion selectivity and detection limit. IEC is a very useful technique for the rapid separation and determination of ions in aqueous solution. It does not require any sample preparation or skill and still remains one of the most powerful instrumental techniques for the estimation of anions and cations in diverse sample matrices. Over the past decades, interest in the analytical chemistry of alkyl amines has been mainly encouraged because of environmental concern [5-7]. Amines are industrial chemicals with a wide range of applications. Anthropogenic sources include cattle feed lot operations, waste incineration and sewage treatment. Amines are also emitted from car exhausts. Airborne amines are of special interest because of the role they play in various atmospheric processes [8]. Some amines are toxic and can undergo reaction to form variety of products among which N-nitroso amines are considered as highly carcinogenic [9]. Due to its sensitivity and possibility of simultaneous multi-element determination, the IC method requires only small amount of sample. The stability of the separation system, good selectivity and speed of analysis allow the range of IC applications to increase continually [10]. The IC is generally used for the trace level analysis of chemical and pharmaceutical [1,2,11], biological [12,13], environmental [14,15], oil product [16] and water samples [17-20]. Recent scenario also shows rapid use of this technique in petroleum and fossil fuel industries [5,6,21]. This technique has also been explored for the analysis of biodiesel for the determination of metallic ions [22]. Several methods are available for the estimation of alkanolamines such as MEA (monoethanalamine), DEA, MDEA by IC [23-27]. The application of IEC for organic amine ion is not common, may be because of the relatively low sensitivity with which these species can be detected by using conductometric method. Amine processing solution is not only used in refineries for the absorption of some acidic gases such as hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, but also used for the extraction of other contaminants such as organic acids and sulphur species which form heat stable salts. These heat stable salts tie up a part of the amine and reduce the absorption capacity of the solution and results in building up of heat stable salts which in turn increases the viscosity of the solution, corrosion of the system, and raises the cost of maintenance of the refineries. Hence, monitoring of amine and other cationic species is needed to determine the efficiency of the processing of amine. Few natural gas wells may contain high concentration of Carbon dioxide (CO2) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) which are weak acidic gases. The high sulphide content and acidity from dissolved carbon dioxide makes sour gas undesirable as a commercial product. Therefore, sour gases are typically treated with amine solutions (e.g., ethanol amine, methanol amine and MDEA) to absorb CO2 and H2S gases. An aqueous solution of a strong base such as NaOH or KOH will not readily release these gases once dissolved. Whereas, amine processing solution containing any dialkyl amine or mixture of them is rather weak base and will re-release H2S or CO2 when this solution is heated (Figure 1). Therefore, the amine processing solution is recycled in a regeneration unit, which heats the amine processing solution from the scrubber unit to release these acidic gases into a purer form and returns the regenerated amine to the scrubber unit again for reuse. The amine solution also removes other contaminants from compounds such as oxalic acid, propanoic acid, formic acid, acetic acid, thiosulfate and thiocyanate. These respective anions bind with the amine and form salts which are collectively termed as ‘Heat Stable Amine Salts’ (HSS). High concentration of heat stable salt content in the amine solution increases the viscosity of the solution, reduces the absorption capacity of the acids and increases corrosion induced maintenance cost. These amines waste solutions must also be characterized to comply with discharge permit. Present study establishes a method for the determination of said amine (Figure 2) such as di-methyl amine, diethyl amine, di-propyl amine, di-isopropyl amine, di-butyl amine and MDEA as well as common metal cations by IC using conductometric detection system in non-suppressed ion mode. This method allows fine separation of alkali metal cations with excellent reproducibility, thereby yielding better estimation and accuracy of data. The literature survey has been thoroughly carried. This is for first time that simultaneous analysis of inorganic ions as Li+, Na+, NH4+, K+ and organic ions as DMA+, MDEA+, DEA+, DPA+, DIPA+ and DBA+ have been carried in amine processing solutions in non-suppressed mode.

chromatography-separation-techniques-diagram

Figure 1: Flow diagram of regeneration of amine processing solution.

chromatography-separation-techniques-dialkyl

Figure 2: Structure of Dialkyl Amines and MDEA.

Experimental Procedure

Materials and methods

The reagents used were of analytical grade. Mobile phase of 3 mmol CH3SO3H (90%):CH3CN (10%) concentration was prepared. Aqueous solutions were prepared by using deionized water, ultra-pure (18.0 MΩ cm) obtained from a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Standard stock solutions of DMA, MDEA, DEA, DIPA, DPA, and DBA in the concentration range of 500-1000 ppm were prepared by weighing adequate mass into 0.4 N CH3COOH. Stock solution of each amine solution was diluted to the required concentration by deionized water. Fresh working standard solution that contains less than 50 mgL-1 amine cations were prepared. They were diluted to the concentration less than 10 mgL-1 in deionized water using the stock solution. 289.76 mg of CH3SO3H (methylsulfonic acid) was dissolved in 300 mL MQ water in a 1 L volumetric flask.

Instrumentation

Dionex ion chromatograph instrument (Sunnywale, CA, USA) Model ICS 3000 equipped with ion conductivity detector in a no suppressor mode was used for the analysis. A cation exchange, guard column Dionex IonPac SCG 1 (4 × 50 mm, I.D. product no. 061523) and analytical column Dionex IonPac SCS 1 (4 × 250 mm, I.D. product no. 061521) were used. In all the cases, flow rate was 1.0 mL min-1 and the injection volume was 25.0 μL. Separation was achieved within 20 min. Data were acquired by using chromeleon 6.80 SR7 Build 2528 (148369) software.

Results and Discussion

The analytical method

The determination of common metal cations such as Li+, Na+, K+, and types of dialkyl amines such as DMA, MDEA, DEA, DIPA, DPA, and DBA and their degradation products including ammonium ion are important in amine processing solution. Good separation of inorganic ions was achieved in 3.0 mmol CH3SO3H (aq), 100%. However organic ions could not be resolved in this mobile phase due to poor compatibility of organic molecules in aqueous system, so mobile phase combination of 3 mmol CH3SO3H and CH3CN, in the ratio of 90:10 was used for the separation. In this eluent system, all analytes were well separated within 20 min on Ion Pac SCS1 column at 30°C. The retention time and resolution of metal cations (Li+, Na+, K+), NH4+ ion, MDEA and dialkyl cations are given in the Tables 1 and 2 and representative ion chromatogram is given in the Figure 3. The resolution between subsequent chromatogram peaks have been calculated and mentioned in Table 2. The resolution value has been found to >1. Calibration curves were drawn at various concentrations to check the linearity of the method. Good linearity was observed for all the cations and linear correlation coefficient (R2) in the range of 0.9980-1.0 was obtained and summary of calibration is given in the Table 1 and Figure 4. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) were calculated [28] and the results are shown in Table 2. The LOD and LOQ were observed in the range of 0.037-0.879 and 0.111-2.638 respectively.

chromatography-separation-techniques-chromatograms

Figure 3: Representative ion chromatograms of 10 analytes.

chromatography-separation-techniques-calibration

Figure 4: Calibration curve of Li+, Na+, NH4+, K+, DMA+, MDEA+, DEA+, DIPA+, DPA+ and DBA+ cations.

S. No. Standard RT Concentration in ppm Slope Y-Intercept R2 %SD
1 Lithium 5.71 2.5 5 10 20 - - 0.986 0.0607 1.0 0.804
2 Sodium 6.41 2.5 5 10 20 - - 0.2588 0.0853 0.9998 0.193
3 Ammonium 6.79 2.5 5 10 20 - - 0.2753 0.0683 0.9994 2.333
4 Potassium 7.81 2.5 5 10 20 - - 0.137 0.0047 0.9995 1.161
5 Dimethyl amine 8.6 3.1 6.25 12.5 25 50 100 0.0716 0.0196 0.9994 2.066
6 Methyl diethanol amine 9.5 3.26 6.52 13.1 26.2 52.4 104.8 0.0522 0.1088 0.9980 1.605
7 Diethyl amine 10.03 3.5 7.05 14.1 28.3 56.3 113 0.0777 0.0631 0.9996 2.148
8 Diisopropyl amine 12.0 3.39 6.71 13.41 27.25 54.5 105 0.055 -0.1075 0.9983 1.449
9 Dipropyl amine 12.6 3.35 6.75 13.5 27 54 108 0.0621 -0.1566 0.9985 1.314
10 Dibutyl amine 17.9 3.75 7.5 15 30 60 120 0.0555 0.4076 0.9989 18.39

R2=Linear Correlation Coefficient

Table 1: Summary of the calibration and Standard Deviation for each specific cation.

S.No. Standard/Ions name Peak Resolution (R) LOD LOQ
1 Lithium - 0.037 0.111
2 Sodium 2.43 0.231 0.695
3 Ammonium 1.07 0.387 1.161
4 Potassium 2.72 0.317 0.953
5 Dimethyl amine 1.92 0.139 0.417
6 Methyl diethanol amine 1.37 0.411 1.233
7 Diethyl amine 1.84 0.131 0.847
8 Diisopropyl amine 3.64 0.092 0.277
9 Dipropyl amine 1.01 0.042 0.126
10 Dibutyl amine 6.66 0.879 2.638

Table 2: Peak resolution (R), LOD and LOQ for all cations.

Mixture of standards was injected 10 times under identical condition of separation into the IC system to check the repeatability. Areas corresponding to each analyte were recorded and standard deviation was calculated. RSD falls in the range of 0.8 to 2.33 except for DBA which was 18.3 and given in the Table 1. The reason behind the high RSD value for the DBA was broadening of peak caused by its larger size and long retention time as compared to other cations such as Li and Na.

Recovery study

Recovery study of all the above-mentioned cations, ammonium ions, and dialkyl amines were done in the real matrix i.e., amine processing solution which was obtained from an IOCL refinery. In that amine processing solution matrix, mixture of standards in different concentration such as 4 ppm, 8 ppm, 12 ppm, 16 ppm and 20 ppm were doped prior to injection, mixed thoroughly, and kept for 10-15 min for matrix effect on the analyte. In all the cases recovery of analyte from the matrix was in the range of 80-120% except ammonium ion and diethyl amines which were recovered 70.14% and 125% respectively, at doped condition of 4 ppm. Results of recovery experiments are given in the Table 3.

  Recovery percentage at different concentration
Conc. Doped Li+ Na+ NH4+ K+ DMA+ MDEA+ DEA+ DIPA+ DPA+ DBA+
4 PPM Doped 96.74 84.99 70.14 82.63 94.13 95.28 125.00 97.00 95.71 99.07
8 PPM Doped 99.69 100.69 94.45 107.29 96.03 98.17 117.41 99.30 98.11 109.48
12 PPM Doped 100.05 104.07 100.64 106.82 101.90 103.4 116.17 88.70 81.74 100.15
16 PPM Doped 100.85 101.54 100.07 102.63 98.49 99.87 87.21 101.41 100.92 98.38
20PPM Doped 101.26 102.50 100.51 99.91 99.65 101.3 96.11 87.92 81.55 104.41

Table 3: Recovery percentage of cations at different concentration.

Determination of cations in refinery samples

Samples received from Indian oil refineries composed of amines, cations etc. were analysed under identical conditions. All the analytes were well separated on Ion Pac SCS1 column at 30°C by ion chromatograph in non-suppressed mode.

Samples from refinery A

Lean amine samples received from IOCL (refinery A) contains MDEA which was used as a base for removal of sour gases. Nine samples from refinery A were analysed and found to contain Na+, NH4+, and K+ in amine processing solution (Table 4 and Figure 5). Na+ and K+ ion were found in the range of 150-340 ppm and 200-803 ppm respectively. NH4+ ion was found to be present below 25 ppm in the sample number A1-6 whereas, NH4+ ion was found to be present between 400-850 ppm in the sample number A7-9 of refinery A. The major peak in the samples was identified as MDEA. The estimated concentration of MDEA was found in the percentage range of 5-24% in above samples. The lowest concentration of MDEA (5.12%) was observed in sample number A5 and highest concentration (23.7%) was observed in sample number A7.

chromatography-separation-techniques-overlaid

Figure 5: Overlaid Ion Chromatogram of Lean Amine sample of Refinery A.

S.No Sample Name Ion Identified
(In ppm) Percentage (%)
Na+ NH4+ K+ MDEA+
1 Refinery A1 221.1 24.8 397.2 13.1
2 Refinery A2 153.3 19.3 519.1 20.5
3 Refinery A3 167.7 15.7 516.8 19.7
4 Refinery A4 236.3 19.3 645.4 19.6
5 Refinery A5 187.4 21.6 206.1 5.12
6 Refinery A6 224.8 11.6 707.1 21.1
7 Refinery A7 175.4 816.9 802.6 23.7
8 Refinery A8 278.8 841.7 801.1 23.2
9 Refinery A9 335.4 437.3 771.0 24.1

Table 4: Lean Amine samples from Refinery A.

Samples from refinery B

Three aqueous samples of refinery B were analysed by IC. Results are shown in the Table 5 and Figure 6. Two samples from Stripped Sour Water (SSW) and Sulfur Recovery Unit (SRU) contain very less amount of Na+ (6.2 ppm) and K+ (1.99 ppm) ion as compared to NH4+ ion (~47ppm). Similarly, high amount of NH4+ (4595.6 ppm) was observed in the Residue Fluid Catalytic Cracker Unit (RFCCU) sample as compared to Na+ and K+ ions. The estimation to such a low concentration of Na+ and K+ ions in samples from refinery B indicates that the IC is an excellent technique to differentiate between sour water and stripped sour water.

chromatography-separation-techniques-ion

Figure 6: Overlaid Ion Chromatogram of SSW, SRU, RFCCU Samples of Refinery B.

S.No. Sample Name Ion Identified in PPM
Na+ NH4+ K+
1 SSW 6.2 46.95 1.99
2 SRU PIT 75.87 33.6 53.5
3 Sour Water Ex RFCCU 103.4 4595.6 97.8

Table 5: Samples from Refinery B.

Samples from refinery C

Four lean amine samples were received from unit-A and unit-B of refinery C. These samples were subsequently analysed by using this method. Results are shown in the Table 6 and Figure 7. The presence of cations in the unit-A was less as compared to unit-B.

chromatography-separation-techniques-amine

Figure 7: Overlaid Ion Chromatogram of Sample No. 1-4 of unit 21 and 51 Lean Amine sample of Refinery C.

S.No. Sample Name Ion Identified in PPM
Na+ NH4+ K+
1 U-21, S.No. 1 260.4 47.4 1581.2
2 U-51, S.No. 2 2537.9 529.2 1603.0
3 U-21, S.No. 3 302.7 56.7 1524.7
4 U-51, S.No. 4 3234.1 306.1 2176.2

Table 6: Lean Amine sample from Refinery C.

Naphtha cracker plant sample

Samples of reclaimer unit from refinery C were received and injected in the IC instrument for the detection of cations. Only one ion i.e., Na+ ion was identified in the range from 2663 to 12208 ppm by this method. Naphtha Cracker Plant reclaimer outlet sample contains high amount of Na+ ion which is nearly 10959 to 12208 ppm as compared to PNCP reclaimer inlet which shows 4857.8 - 5721.23 ppm. Results are given in the Table 7 and overlaid chromatogram is also shown in the Figure 8.

chromatography-separation-techniques-diagram

Figure 8: Overlaid Ion Chromatogram of Naptha Cracker Plant of Refinery C.

S.No. Sample Name Ion Identified (Na+) in PPM
1 Naphtha Cracker Reclaimer Drain ATU 1 3638.1
2 Naphtha Cracker Lean Amine ATU 2 2663.3
3 Naphtha Cracker Reclaimer Outlet 3 10959.6
4 Naphtha Cracker Reclaimer Inlet 4 4857.8
5 Naphtha Cracker Reclaimer Outlet 5 12208.1
6 Naphtha Cracker Reclaimer Inlet 6 5721.23

Table 7: Naphtha Cracker Plant Samples of Refinery C.

Conclusion

A fast method based on IC for simultaneous determination of common metal ions and dialkyl amines by ion chromatograph in no suppressor mode has been developed. The method permits excellent separation, reproducibility and estimation accuracy. Majority of the samples contains Na+, NH4+, K+ and MDEA. All analysed samples do not contain any said dialkyl amine. In addition, higher concentration of MDEA can also be analysed by this method because it appears in the chromatogram between DMA and same amount of MDEA was present in the sample as per area count in the chromatogram. The RSD (N=10) of peak areas was in the lower range of 0.8 to 2.33 except DBA which was 18.3.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. R. Suresh, Executive Director, R&D (I/C), IOCL Faridabad, for their keen interest, support, and encouragement in carrying out this work.

References

  1. Lucy CA, Hatsis P (2004) Fundamental and application of chromatography and related differential migration methods. In: Heftmann E (ed.), Journal of Chromatography Library, 69A, 6th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherland, pp: 171-211.
  2. Christian GD (2004) Analytical Chemistry. 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd., Singapore, pp: 622-627.
  3. Small H, Bowman B (1998) Ion Chromatography: Historical Perspective. Am Lab 10: 1-5.
  4. Small H, Stevens TS, Bauman WC (1975) Novel ion exchange chromatographic method using conductimetric detection. Anal Chem 47: 1801-1809.
  5. Kadnar R (1999) Determination of amines used in the oil and gas industry (upstream section) by ion chromatography. J Chromatogr A 850: 289-295.
  6. Weiss J (1995) Ion Chromatography. VCH, Weinheim, Germany. 2nd edn, pp: 182-185.
  7. Zhao J, Smith JN, Eisele FL, Chen M, Kuang C, et al. (2011) Observation of neutral sulfuric acid-amine containing clusters in laboratory and ambient measurements. Atmos Chem Phys 11: 19729-19768.
  8. Tricker AR, Preussmann R (1991) Carcinogenic N-nitrosamines in the diet: occurrence, formation, mechanisms and carcinogenic potential. Mutat Res 259: 277-289.
  9. Blazewicz A, Dolliver W, Sivsammye S, Deol A, Randhawa R, et al. (2010) Determination of cadmium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc in thyroid glands of patients with diagnosed nodular goitre using ion chromatography. J Chromatogr B 878: 34-38.
  10. Jackson PE (2000) Ion Chromatography in Environmental Analysis. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. In: Meyers RA (ed.), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp: 2779-2801.
  11. Meyer VR (1998) Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Saint Gallen.
  12. Blazewicz A, Orlicz-Szczesna G, Prystupa A, Szczesny P (2010) Use of ion chromatography for the determination of selected metals in blood serum of patients with type 2 diabetes.  J Trace Elem Med Biol 24: 14-19.
  13. Otero-Santos SM, Delinsky AD, Valentin-Blasini L, Schiffer J, Blount BC (2009) Analysis of Perchlorate in Dried Blood Spots Using Ion Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 81:1931-1936.
  14. Pontes FVM, Carneiro MC, Vaitsman DS, Rocha GP, Silva LID, et al. (2009) A simplified version of the total Kjeldahl nitrogen method using an ammonia extraction ultrasound-assisted purge-and-trap system and ion chromatography for analyses of geological samples.Anal Chim Acta 632: 284-288
  15. Pontes FVM, Carneiro MC, Vaitsman DS, Monteiro MIC, Silva LID, et al. (2010) Application of a Purge-and-Trap System for Fixed-NH4+ Determination by Matrix Interference Free Ion Chromatography in Oil Reservoir Rocks. J Braz Chem Soc 21: 1126-1128.
  16. Pereira JSF, Diehl LO, Duarte FA, Santos MFP, Guimaraes RCL, et al. (2008) Chloride determination by IC in petroleum coke after digestion by microwave-induced combustion. J Chromatogr A1213: 249-252.
  17. Jiang XL, Lim LW, Takeuchi T (2009) Determination of trace inorganic anions in seawater samples by ion chromatography using silica columns modified with cetyltrimethylammonium ion. Anal Bioanal Chem 393: 387-391.
  18. Atwood SE, Wallwey DD (1996) Ion chromatographic cation analysis of effluent waters from scale dissolver treatments. J Chromatogr A 739: 265-271.
  19. Gros N, Camões MF, Oliveira C, Silva MCR (2008) Ionic composition of seawaters and derived saline solutions determined by ion chromatography and its relation to other water quality parameters. J Chromatog A 1210: 92-98.
  20. Caland LB, de Silveira ELC, Tubino M (2012) Determination of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium cations in biodiesel by ion chromatography.  Anal chim Acta 718: 116-120.
  21. El-Said M, Ramzi M, Abdel-Moghny T (2009) Analysis of oilfield waters by ion chromatography to determine the composition of scale deposition. Desalination 249: 748-756.
  22. Crea F, De Robertis A, Giuffre O (2004) The retention of some open-chain diamines on a strong cation-exchange resin in ion chromatography as a function of their structure. J Chromatogr Sci 42: 161-166.
  23. Alltech Associates (1997) Analysis of amines by Ion Chromatography.Application Note No. A0024, pp: 1-2.
  24. Hermans C, Jonkers ACA, de Bokx PK (2010) Determination of amines in the presence of excess ammonia by ion chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr Sci 48: 544-548.
  25. Vialle J, Navarro P, Nguyet TT, Lanteri P, Longeray R (1991) Experimental design for the optimization of the separation of aliphatic amines by ion chromatography. J Chromatogr A 549: 159-174.
  26. VandenBoer TC, Markovic MZ, Petroff A, Czar MF, Borduas N, et al. (2012) Ion chromatographic separation and quantitation of alkyl methylamines and ethylamines in atmospheric gas and particulate matter using preconcentration and suppressed conductivity detection.  J Chromatogr A1252: 74-83.
  27. Zhu Y, Wang M, Du H, Wang F, Mou S, et al. (2002) Organic analysis by ion chromatography. 1. Determination of aromatic amines and aromatic diisocyanates by cation-exchange chromatography with amperometric detection. J Chromatogr A 956: 215-220.
  28. Long GL, Winefordner JD (1983) Limit of detection. A closer look at the IUPAC definition, Analytical Chemistry 55: 712A-724A.
Citation: Singh R, Khan MA, Yadav A, Chopra A, Kagdiyal V (2018) Simultaneous Determination of Ammonium Ion, MDEA, Common Metal Cations and Dialkyl Amines in Amine Processing Solution by Ion Chromatography. J Chromatogr Sep Tech 9: 416.

Copyright: © 2018 Singh R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.