Journal of Down Syndrome & Chromosome Abnormalities

Journal of Down Syndrome & Chromosome Abnormalities
Open Access

ISSN: 2472-1115

+44 1223 790975

Review Article - (2016) Volume 2, Issue 1

Beyond Trisomy 21: Phenotypic Variability in People with Down Syndrome Explained by Further Chromosome Mis-segregation and Mosaic Aneuploidy

Huntington Potter*
Department of Neurology, Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, Rocky Mountain Alzheimer’s Disease Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, USA
*Corresponding Author: Huntington Potter, Department of Neurology, Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, Rocky Mountain Alzheimer’s Disease Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, USA, Tel: 303-724-7385 Email:

Abstract

Phenotypic variability is a fundamental feature of the human population and is particularly evident among people with Down syndrome and/or Alzheimer’s disease. Herein, we review current theories of the potential origins of this phenotypic variability and propose a novel mechanism based on our finding that the Alzheimer’s disease-associated Aβ peptide, encoded on chromosome 21, disrupts the mitotic spindle, induces abnormal chromosome segregation, and produces mosaic populations of aneuploid cells in all tissues of people with Alzheimer’s disease and in mouse and cell models thereof. Thus, individuals exposed to increased levels of the Aβ peptide should accumulate mosaic populations of aneuploid cells, with different chromosomes affected in different tissues and in different individuals. Specifically, people with Down syndrome, who express elevated levels of Aβ peptide throughout their lifetimes, would be predicted to accumulate additional types of aneuploidy, beyond trisomy 21 and including changes in their trisomy 21 status, in mosaic cell populations. Such mosaic aneuploidy would introduce a novel form of genetic variability that could potentially underlie much of the observed phenotypic variability among people with Down syndrome, and possibly also among people with Alzheimer’s disease. This mosaic aneuploidy theory of phenotypic variability in Down syndrome is supported by several observations, makes several testable predictions, and identifies a potential approach to reducing the frequency of some of the most debilitating features of Down syndrome, including Alzheimer’s disease.

<

Keywords: Down syndrome; Alzheimer’s disease; Mitosis; Aneuploidy; Aß peptide; Mosaicism; Phenotypic variation

Introduction

Almost all people with Down syndrome carry a complete or nearly complete extra copy of chromosome 21 [1,2]. The resulting alterations in expression, both from genes on chromosome 21 itself and from genes on other chromosomes affected, for example, by transcription factors encoded on chromosome 21, lead to a wide range of phenotypic differences between people with Down syndrome and those of the typical population [1,3,4]. Curiously, there is also a high degree of phenotypic variability among people with Down syndrome. For example, only a very small percentage of people with Down syndrome develop childhood leukemia, whereas a much larger percentage of people with Down syndrome, but not all, are born with heart defects requiring surgery [5-8]. Thus, understanding the underlying causes of the phenotypic variability among people with Down syndrome is of equal scientific interest and medical importance as understanding the phenotypic variability between people with Down syndrome and the typical population. Indeed, if it were possible to understand the mechanism underlying the variability among people with Down syndrome, it might be possible to develop interventions directed at increasing the likelihood of more beneficial characteristics and reducing the likelihood or severity of challenging ones.

It is widely accepted among Down syndrome researchers that changes in gene expression caused by trisomy 21 are influenced by other inherited alleles and by the environment, thus leading to phenotypic variability that is similar to that observed in the typical population. However, recent work from our laboratory has identified another likely contributor to phenotypic variability in people with Down syndrome that may be of equal or greater consequence. Specifically, we have found that the A peptide, encoded by the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene that resides on chromosome 21, can induce large, permanent changes in the genome with potentially wide-ranging effects on gene expression, and, thus, on phenotypes in people with Down syndrome.

The A peptide is produced via proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein by β-secretase and β-secretase (presenilin) and is the key component of the Alzheimer’s disease pathogenic pathway. According to the ‘Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis,’ increased levels of the Aβ peptide lead to phosphorylation of the microtubule stabilizing protein Tau, which aggregates into neurofibrillary tangles that cause neuronal damage and neurodegeneration [9-13]. Some years ago, we proposed and then demonstrated that people with Alzheimer’s disease develop mosaic trisomy 21 and other aneuploidy as a consequence of mitotic defects leading to chromosome mis-segregation. The trisomy 21 cells, in turn, would contribute to Alzheimer’s disease pathology and dementia via the same mechanism that trisomy 21 leads to Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology by the age of 40 years and a greatly increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease dementia in people with Down syndrome and complete trisomy 21, but at a later age due to the modulating effect of the majority euploid cells in typical Alzheimer’s disease [14-16]. This result has been replicated and extended in several laboratories, and, indeed, the accumulation and specific degeneration of the almost 30% of neurons that are aneuploid in the brain can account for 90% of the neuronal cell loss observed at autopsy in typical Alzheimer’s disease ([17-24]; for reviews see [25,26]).

In our investigations of the mechanisms by which aneuploidy arises in Alzheimer’s disease, we discovered that Aβ-42, either added exogenously or produced endogenously due to APP overexpression or due to expression of familial Alzheimer’s disease-causing mutant forms of the APP or presenilin genes, directly induces mitotic spindle abnormalities, chromosome mis-segregation, and aneuploidy both in mouse and cell culture models of Alzheimer’s disease [27,28]. In subsequent studies, we discovered that Aβ-42 binds to and inhibits several microtubule-dependent motor proteins that are essential for normal mitotic spindle structure and function [29].

The finding that the Aβ peptide induces chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy leads us to hypothesize that the excess Aβ peptide produced in people with Down syndrome throughout their lifetimes will lead to stochastic chromosome mis-segregation and the accumulation of mosaic aneuploidy in tissues that include dividing cells and/or cells that can re-enter the cell cycle in response to stress or to cell loss/damage. Furthermore, the Aβ peptide-induced chromosome mis-segregation-a stochastic process-will lead to different levels of aneuploidy for the various chromosomes in each individual and in each tissue within an individual. This highly genetically variable population of cells will exhibit different patterns of gene expression in individual tissues and different individuals, resulting in the observed phenotypic variability.

This mosaic aneuploidy theory of phenotypic variability in Down syndrome makes testable predictions that our own work and searches of the literature indicate have already been partly satisfied.

Prediction 1

There should be evidence of chromosome mis-segregation/ aneuploidy in people with Down syndrome that affects multiple chromosomes, including potentially chromosome 21 itself.

Prediction 2

Because Alzheimer’s disease is at least in part a cell cycle disease in which the generation and specific loss of aneuploid neurons in the brain accounts for 90% of the neuronal cell loss at autopsy, a person with trisomy 21 Down syndrome but with only two copies of the APP gene should not exhibit mosaic aneuploidy and may not develop Alzheimer’s disease.

We will consider each of these predictions in view of current knowledge.

1) First, all available data are consistent with the hypothesis that people with Down syndrome are prone to undergoing additional chromosome mis-segregation beyond trisomy 21 and including changes in their trisomy 21 status. For example, Percy et al. [30] and Jenkins et al. [31] found that many people with DS progressively lose their third copy of chromosome 21 in up to 4% of their peripheral blood lymphocytes, and that they also exhibit increased levels of mosaic aneuploidy for other chromosomes. Furthermore, several researchers found an increased frequency of micronuclei (a measure of chromosome mis-segregation, chromosome breakage/damage, and genomic instability) in buccal cells [32-36] and in peripheral blood lymphocytes [37] in both younger and aged people with DS.

Such divergent levels of aneuploidy and genomic instability may underlie the observed phenotypic variation in people with Down syndrome, particularly with regard to the variation in their age of onset of Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Specifically, although every adult with Down syndrome will have the characteristic neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease by the age of 30–40 years, the average age of onset of Alzheimer’s disease dementia varies greatly, with ~25% starting to show signs of dementia in their early thirties, and with 25–50% having a more delayed onset, or not developing dementia at all even by age >60 years (for reviews, see [3,38]).

2) Multiple investigations have revealed a cell cycle defect in Alzheimer’s disease [26], including a defect in mitosis that leads to chromosome mis-segregation, trisomy 21, and other forms of aneuploidy, as we predicted [15]. For example, flourescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to measure aneuploidy, and specifically trisomy 21, in primary fibroblasts from Alzheimer’s disease patients and age-matched control individuals [14,16]. Our analysis of thousands of fibroblasts from 27 AD and 13 control individuals showed that the fibroblasts from the Alzheimer’s disease patients were more than twice as likely (p = 0.007) to exhibit trisomy 21 relative to the fibroblasts from the age-matched control individuals. Notably, the increased frequency of trisomy 21 cells in fibroblasts from Alzheimer’s disease patients was independent of age.

We also found that chromosome mis-segregation was associated with all types of Alzheimer’s disease, including sporadic and familial Alzheimer’s disease (i.e., patients carrying a mutation in either of the presenilin (PS1 or PS2) genes or in the APP gene. Finally, we also detected increased levels of chromosome 18 aneuploidy in fibroblasts from Alzheimer’s disease patients, indicating that the cell cycle defect leading to chromosome mis-segregation was not specific to chromosome 21, although it appeared to be associated with chromosome 21 most often, possibly due to trisomy 21 cells being less prone to dying in vivo compared to other types of aneuploid cells.

Chromosome mis-segregation in patients with sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, particularly involving, but not restricted to, chromosome 21, has been confirmed in blood lymphocytes [20,21], in buccal cells [23], and in brain neurons [17-19,22,24] As discussed, our further investigations showed that mutations in the APP or presenilin genes that cause familial Alzheimer’s disease, and exposure to increased levels of the Aβ peptide, the product of the cleavage of the APP protein by the presenilin-containing β secretase and the β-secretase (BACE), induce chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy in mouse models and cell culture models of AD [27-29].

The significance of the close to 30% trisomy 21 and other aneuploidy in the Alzheimer’s disease brain and the specific loss of aneuploid neurons in Alzheimer’s disease is reinforced by the fact that all aneuploid calls are prone to apoptosis [39-43], which we have also found to be true in the brain.

Similar to amyloid deposits, the increased levels of aneuploidy in the Alzheimer’s disease brain appear to be likely due to the overproduction of the Aβ peptide and its oligomers. Overproduction of Aβ may arise, for example, as a consequence of familial AD-causing mutations in the APP or presenilin genes or by an inflammation-induced increase in APP translation [44,45], whereas an increased conversion of the Aβ peptide to toxic oligomers is promoted by the catalytic activity of apolipoprotein-E, especially the apoE4 variant [46]. These mechanisms would most certainly be exacerbated by the third copy of the APP gene in any trisomy 21 cells that arise. Therefore, if the third copy of the APP gene were eliminated in trisomy 21 cells of people with Down syndrome, then Aβ-induced aneuploidy, apoptosis, and possibly Alzheimer’s disease symptoms should not arise. Indeed the few reports of people with Down syndrome who carry only two copies of the APP gene due to a deletion of one copy of the APP gene on one of their three copies of chromosome 21 indicate a lack of Alzheimer-like dementia even at age 60+ [47]. On the other hand, if the tau pathology in people with trisomy 21 Down syndrome partly arises by a mechanism that is dependent on the extra copy of chromosome 21, but independent of Aβ, then some neuronal loss and cognitive decline may still be evident, which future studies may clarify. We would further predict that because people with Down syndrome with only two copies of the APP gene lack the aneugenic activity associated with excess Aβ peptide, they will not accumulate additional mosaic aneuploidy with age and will therefore show less variability (i.e., they will occupy the middle of the distribution curve) for other Down syndrome-related clinical phenotypes, including cognition, some of which may be more or less pronounced in the vast majority of people with Down syndrome who have three copies of the APP gene and thus an increased propensity for mosaic aneuploidy beyond trisomy 21.

The mosaic aneuploidy hypothesis of phenotypic variability in Down syndrome makes additional predictions that we are in the process of testing. For example, the brains of people with Down syndrome who die in their 50s and 60s without evidence of Alzheimer’s disease dementia may be somehow resistant to the aneugenic (and, therefore, cell death-inducing) activity of Aβ and may, thus, show decreased levels of neuronal aneuploidy and apoptosis compared to individuals who die with both Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. People with Down syndrome who appear resistant to Alzheimer’s disease dementia may also exhibit less variability in their other clinical phenotypes. Interestingly, the results of our preliminary studies show that typical aged individuals without Down syndrome who died with extensive Alzheimer’s disease brain pathology, yet had no signs of Alzheimer’s disease dementia, show little evidence of trisomy 21 or other aneuploidy in their brain neurons.

Conclusion

In sum, the ability of the Alzheimer’s disease-associated Aβ peptide to induce mitotic spindle abnormalities, chromosome mis-segregation, and mosaic aneuploidy can lead to variable levels of aneuploidy in people with trisomy 21 Down syndrome, and, therefore, to variations in gene copy number and expression. Such variations in gene expression between different, genetically mosaic tissues and individuals may underlie the wide phenotypic variability that is observed among different people with Down syndrome.

References

  1. Epstein CJ (1990) The consequences of chromosome imbalance. Am J Med Genet Suppl 7: 31-37.
  2. Wisniewski HM, Rabe A, Wisniewski KE (1988) Neuropathology and dementia in people with Down’s syndrome. Molecular Neuropathology of Aging. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York.
  3. Hartley D, Blumenthal T, Carrillo M, DiPaolo G, Esralew L, et al. (2015) Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease: Common pathways, common goals. Alzheimers Dement 11: 700-709.
  4. Lott IT (2012) Neurological phenotypes for Down syndrome across the life span. Prog Brain Res 197: 101-121.
  5. Antonarakis SE, Lyle R, Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A, Deutsch S (2004) Chromosome 21 and down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat Rev Genet 5: 725-738.
  6. Ding B (2015)How does a 1.5-Fold Increase in Gene Dosage in Chromosome 21 Causes the Pleiotropic Phenotypes in Down Syndrome? J Down SyndrChrAbnorm1:e101.
  7. Deitz SL,RJ Roper (2011)Trisomic and allelic differences influence phenotypic variability during development of Down syndrome mice. Genetics 189: 1487-1495.
  8. Letourneau A, Antonarakis SE (2012) Genomic determinants in the phenotypic variability of Down syndrome. Prog Brain Res 197: 15-28.
  9. Glenner GG, Wong CW (1984) Alzheimer's disease and Down's syndrome: sharing of a unique cerebrovascular amyloid fibril protein. BiochemBiophys Res Commun 122: 1131-1135.
  10. Goldgaber D, Lerman MI, McBride OW, Saffiotti U, Gajdusek DC (1987) Characterization and chromosomal localization of a cDNA encoding brain amyloid of Alzheimer's disease. Science 235: 877-880.
  11. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ (2002) The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 297: 353-356.
  12. Masters CL, Simms G, Weinman NA, Multhaup G, McDonald BL, et al. (1985) Amyloid plaque core protein in Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 82: 4245-4249.
  13. Neve RL, Finch EA, Dawes LR (1988) Expression of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor gene transcripts in the human brain. Neuron 1: 669-677.
  14. Geller LN, Potter H (1999) Chromosome missegregation and trisomy 21 mosaicism in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis 6: 167-179.
  15. Potter H (1991) Review and hypothesis: Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome--chromosome 21 nondisjunction may underlie both disorders. Am J Hum Genet 48: 1192-1200.
  16. Potter H, Geller LN (1996) Alzheimer's disease, Down's syndrome, and chromosome segregation. Lancet 348: 66.
  17. Arendt T, Brückner MK, Mosch B, Lösche A (2010) Selective cell death of hyperploid neurons in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Pathol 177: 15-20.
  18. Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, Yurov YB (2009) Aneuploidy in the normal, Alzheimer's disease and ataxia-telangiectasia brain: differential expression and pathological meaning. Neurobiol Dis 34: 212-220.
  19. Kingsbury MA, Yung YC, Peterson SE, Westra JW, Chun J (2006) Aneuploidy in the normal and diseased brain. Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 2626-2641.
  20. Migliore L, Botto N, Scarpato R, Petrozzi L, Cipriani G, et al. (1999) Preferential occurrence of chromosome 21 malsegregation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of Alzheimer disease patients. Cytogenet Cell Genet 87: 41-46.
  21. Migliore L, Testa A, Scarpato R, Pavese N, Petrozzi L, et al. (1997) Spontaneous and induced aneuploidy in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Hum Genet 101: 299-305.
  22. Mosch B, Morawski M, Mittag A, Lenz D, Tarnok A, et al. (2007) Aneuploidy and DNA replication in the normal human brain and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 27: 6859-6867.
  23. Thomas P, Fenech M (2008) Chromosome 17 and 21 aneuploidy in buccal cells is increased with ageing and in Alzheimer's disease. Mutagenesis 23: 57-65.
  24. Arendt T (2012) Cell cycle activation and aneuploid neurons in Alzheimer's disease. MolNeurobiol 46: 125-135.
  25. Potter H (2008) Down’s syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease: two sides of the same coin. Future Neurology 3: 29-37.
  26. Potter H, Granic A, Caneus J (2016) Role of Trisomy 21 Mosaicism in Sporadic and Familial Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 13: 7-17.
  27. Boeras DI, Granic A, Padmanabhan J, Crespo NC, Rojiani AM, et al. (2008) Alzheimer's presenilin 1 causes chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy. Neurobiol Aging 29: 319-328.
  28. Granic A, Padmanabhan J, Norden M, Potter H (2010) Alzheimer Abeta peptide induces chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy, including trisomy 21: requirement for tau and APP. MolBiol Cell 21: 511-520.
  29. Borysov SI, Granic A, Padmanabhan J, Walczak CE, Potter H (2011) Alzheimer Aβ disrupts the mitotic spindle and directly inhibits mitotic microtubule motors. Cell Cycle 10: 1397-1410.
  30. Percy ME, Markovic VD, Dalton AJ, McLachlan DR, Berg JM, et al. (1993) Age-associated chromosome 21 loss in Down syndrome: possible relevance to mosaicism and Alzheimer disease. Am J Med Genet 45: 584-588.
  31. Jenkins EC, Schupf N, Genovese M, Ye LL, Kapell D, et al. (1997) Increased low-level chromosome 21 mosaicism in older individuals with Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet 68: 147-151.
  32. Ferreira FL, Prá D, Martino-Roth MG, Garcias GL (2009) Buccal micronucleus frequency is associated with age in Down syndrome. Genet Mol Res 8: 1231-1237.
  33. Franceschi C, Monti D, Scarfí MR, Zeni O, Temperani P, et al. (1992) Genomic instability and aging. Studies in centenarians (successful aging) and in patients with Down's syndrome (accelerated aging). Ann N Y AcadSci 663: 4-16.
  34. Maluf SW, Erdtmann B (2001) Genomic instability in Down syndrome and Fanconianemia assessed by micronucleus analysis and single-cell gel electrophoresis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 124: 71-75.
  35. Migliore L, Coppedè F, Fenech M, Thomas P (2011) Association of micronucleus frequency with neurodegenerative diseases. Mutagenesis 26: 85-92.
  36. Thomas P, Harvey S, Gruner T, Fenech M (2008) Thebuccalcytome and micronucleus frequency is substantially altered in Down's syndrome and normal ageing compared to young healthy controls. Mutat Res 638: 37-47.
  37. Scarfí MR, Cossarizza A, Monti D, Bersani F, Zannotti M, et al. (1990) Age-related increase of mitomycin C-induced micronuclei in lymphocytes from Down's syndrome subjects. Mutat Res 237: 247-252.
  38. Nizetic D, Chen CL, Hong W, Koo EH (2015) Inter-Dependent Mechanisms Behind Cognitive Dysfunction, Vascular Biology and Alzheimer's Dementia in Down Syndrome: Multi-Faceted Roles of APP. Front BehavNeurosci 9: 299.
  39. Busciglio J, Yankner BA (1995) Apoptosis and increased generation of reactive oxygen species in Down's syndrome neurons in vitro. Nature 378: 776-779.
  40. Kai Y, Wang CC, Kishigami S, Kazuki Y, Abe S, et al. (2009) Enhanced apoptosis during early neuronal differentiation in mouse ES cells with autosomal imbalance. Cell Res 19: 247-258.
  41. Oromendia AB, Amon A (2014) Aneuploidy: implications for protein homeostasis and disease. Dis Model Mech 7: 15-20.
  42. Peterson SE, Yang AH, Bushman DM, Westra JW, Yung YC, et al. (2012)Aneuploid cells are differentially susceptible to caspase-mediated death during embryonic cerebral cortical development. J Neurosci 32: 16213-16222.
  43. Rajendran RS, Wellbrock UM, Zupanc GK (2008) Apoptotic cell death, long-term persistence, and neuronal differentiation of aneuploid cells generated in the adult brain of teleost fish. DevNeurobiol 68: 1257-1268.
  44. Nilsson L, Rogers J, Potter H (1998) The essential role of inflammation and induced gene expression in the pathogenic pathway of Alzheimer's disease. Front Biosci 3: d436-446.
  45. Rogers JT, Leiter LM, McPhee J, Cahill CM, Zhan SS, et al. (1999) Translation of the alzheimer amyloid precursor protein mRNA is up-regulated by interleukin-1 through 5'-untranslated region sequences. J BiolChem 274: 6421-6431.
  46. Potter H, Wisniewski T (2012) Apolipoprotein e: essential catalyst of the Alzheimer amyloid cascade. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2012: 489428.
  47. Prasher VP, Farrer MJ, Kessling AM, Fisher EM, West RJ, et al. (1998) Molecular mapping of Alzheimer-type dementia in Down's syndrome. Ann Neurol 43: 380-383.
Citation: Potter H (2016) Beyond Trisomy 21: Phenotypic Variability in People with Down Syndrome Explained by Further Chromosome Mis-segregation and Mosaic Aneuploidy. J Down Syndr Chr Abnorm 2: 109.

Copyright: © 2016 Potter H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top