Journal of Probiotics & Health

Journal of Probiotics & Health
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-8901

Editorial - (2014) Volume 2, Issue 2

Recombinant Probiotics: Future Perspectives in Disease Treatment

Iryna Sorokulova*
Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, Auburn University, Auburn University, USA
*Corresponding Author: Iryna Sorokulova, Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, Auburn University, Auburn, USA, Fax: 334-844 4542 Email:

Editorial

In recent years, considerable progress has been made towards understanding the role of the microbiota in health and diseases. The microbiota significantly contributes to immune function, digestion, metabolism, gut development and physiology. More scientific data show that the new approaches for the treatment of some diseases can be found by manipulation of the host microbiota. Modulation of the microbiota is becoming an acceptable effective strategy for prophylaxis and treatment of infectious and inflammatory diseases, metabolic disorders, psychotic conditions and cancer. Probiotics are important tools for correction of microbiota changes and maintaining health status of the host. Efficacy of probiotic treatment has been confirmed for acute and antibiotic-associated diarrhea [1], inflammatory bowel disease [2,3], allergic conditions [4], cancer [5], arthritis [6].

Many probiotic bacteria with different spectrum of activity and mechanisms of action are on the market now. However, there are a lot of human health problems needed to be addressed. Modern methods of genetic engineering open the new possibilities for creation of probiotics strains with the desired characteristics. Such probiotics can be designed to improve and to strengthen their existing properties or to influence the critical steps in the pathogenesis of diseases.

One of the most serious threats for healthcare and public safety worldwide is the emergence of multi-resistant strains of pathogens. This problem raises the question as to the discovery of novel therapeutics for the treatment of these infections. Antibacterial activity of probiotic bacteria are well documented in the scientific literature [7-9]. Probiotic bacteria can also significantly influence the host immune resistance by induction ofantimicrobial peptides expression in the organism [10]. But probiotic properties vary considerably in microbial strains [11,12], so construction of new strains that express different antimicrobials and keep probiotic benefits could be a dual strategy for treatment of multi-resistant pathogens. This approach was used for engineering of Lactococcus lactis to produce and secrete heterologous antimicrobial peptides with activity against Gram-negative pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella [13]. Lactobacillus lactis and Escherichia coli were used for construction of recombinant strains with activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus [14,15]. Novel antimicrobial strategy was proposed by Saedi et al. [16]. Authors engineered commensal Escherichia coli strain capable of sensing and killing a pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain through the production and release of antimicrobial peptide pyocin [16].

Combined efficacy of probiotic against pathogenic bacteria and viruses has been achieved by transformation of antagonistically active Bacillus subtilis strain with plasmid DNA, coding human alpha-2 interferon [17]. Antiviral activity of B. subtilis recombinant strain against influenza virus, herpes virus, and equine encephalomyelitis virus was shown in vitro and in experimental animal infections [18]. Efficacy of animal protection against 10 LD50 doses of influenza virus by oral administration of a recombinant strain was 70%, against 100 LD50 doses was 50% [19].

The use of effective vaccines presents a valuable approach in the protection against pathogens. But the currently available vaccines are expensive to produce, require multiple doses, cause side effects in some individuals and are not always effective [20,21]. Additionally, current methods of vaccination target the systemic immune system and elicit insufficient mucosal immune response [22]. Effective mucosal response can be achieved when the vaccine is delivered directly onto mucosal sites (oral, nasal, rectal, vaginal). Live attenuated vaccine vectors such as Samonella, Bordetella, and Listeria have been successfully used as mucosal delivery systems of heterologous antigens in animal models [23,24]. These bacteria are highly immunogenic, but the possibility of reversion to virulence is a significant safety concern [25,26]. Recombinant probiotics offer major advantages as live vaccine vectors. They are safe, possess adjuvant properties, and have additional probiotic effects. Probiotic bacteria can survive transit through the intestinal tract and deliver recombinant vaccines in situ. Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) have been intensively used for construction of effective mucosal delivery vehicles. Different efficient expression systems were developed for LAB, which enabled successful expression of various antigens derived from pathogens in lactobacilli. One of the first recombinant LAB expressing the Tetanus Toxin Fragment C (TTFC) antigen was protective after intranasal administration, against lethal challenge with tetanus toxin in mice [27]. Efficacy of engineered LAB as vaccine delivery vehicle was demonstrated against different bacterial pathogens: Streptococcus pneumoniae [28]; Yersinia pseudotuberculosis [29]; Bacillus anthracis [30], Listeria monocytogenes [31]. Interestingly, that some LAB recombinant vaccine afforded better protection against pathogens than vaccination with purified antigen [28] or traditionally used injected vaccine [25]. Antiviral vaccine based on LAB also showed high efficacy in animal studies. Oral administration of recombinant Lactococcus lactis, expressed avian influenza H5N1 hemagglutinin completely protected the mice against lethal challenges with H5N1 virus [32]. Vaccine strain Lactobacillus jensenii expressing the HIV-1 entry inhibitor cyanovirin-N demonstrated a 63% reduction of HIV infection in macaques after repeated vaginal challenges [33]. Authors concluded that this approach can be applied to reduce transmission of HIV in women.

Bacillus bacteria attract attention of scientists as a perspective vehicle for vaccine delivery [34]. Effective surface display systems based on Bacillus spores were proposed for construction of recombinant vaccine strains [35]. Bacillus spores have many advantages for this purpose: a safety record of the use as probiotics and starter cultures; a low level of anti-spore response in mammalian host; a high stability in the organism, as well as during production and storage [34-38]. B. subtilis spores and cells engineered to express TTFC were effective in inducing robust and consistent systemic immunity in mice and piglets after intranasal or sublingual immunization [39]. This vaccine stored as lyophilized powder maintained protective immunogenicity for 12 months at 45°C. High level of protection against B. anthracis was achieved by intraperitoneal immunization of mice with recombinant B. subtilis strain expressing B. anthracis protective antigen [40]. Oral immunization of hamsters with B. subtilis spores with the displayed cell binding domain of Clostridium difficile toxin A protected animals form challenge with a toxigenic C. difficile strain [41]. B. subtilis strains were used for expression of UreA antigen of Helicobacter acinonychis [42], UreB antigen of Helicobacter pilory [43], heat-labile toxin of Escherichia coli [44]. B. subtilis vaccine strain designed to express murine rotavirus VP6 was effective in protection of mice against rotavirus challenge [45]. Efficacy of protection against enterovirus 71 infection was shown after oral and intranasal immunization of mice with B. subtilis strain expressing viral structural protein VP1 [46]. Recombinant B. subtilis strain expressing antigens from Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) type Asia 1 protected guinea pigs against the viral challenge [47]. The spore display approach was applied also for successful expression of different proteins: green fluorescent protein GFPUV [48]; β-glucuronidase [49]; proinsulin [50]; human serum albumin [51].

Bacillus strains can be also engineered for extracellular production of recombinant proteins because these bacteria have an intrinsic characteristic to secrete different proteins. B. brevis strain was transformed with the plasmid, carrying a synthetic gene of a single chain human insulin precursor [52]. Biological activity of the recombinant product, obtained from the culture supernatant was similar to human insulin. Efficient production of proinsulin into the culture medium was demonstrated by recombinant B. subtilis strain [53].

Probiotic bacteria were successfully engineered for targeted delivery of cytokines at airway mucosa or mucosa of the colon. Specific anti-TTFC antibody responses in mice immunized intranasally with L. lactis, producing TTFC intacellularly and secreting functional murine IL-2 or IL-6, were up to 15-fold higher in comparison with the control animals [54]. Murin colitis were effectively treated by oral administration of L. lactis secreting IL-10 [55]. Mucosal delivery of IL-10 and Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD65) by genetically modified L. lactis prevented development of diabetes in NOD mice [56].

Despite promising efficacy of the recombinant bacteria demonstrated in vitro and in animal studies, only two strains were tested in humans: L. lactis producing IL-10 [57] and B. subtilis secreting human interferon alpha-2 [58]. Both trials showed safety of the recombinant bacteria for patients without any side-effects. B. subtilis recombinant strain was further examined in clinical trials for the treatment of hepatitis and meningoencephalitis [59,60]. The results of clinical trials confirmed safety of a recombinant strain and its efficacy. B. subtilis recombinant strain was approved for medical use in Ukraine.

Recombinant probiotics can be successfully tailored as antimicrobials and gene therapy vectors, for delivery of vaccines and other therapeutics. For future progress with genetically modified probiotics, establishing the criteria for assessment of environmental safety and tracing the fate of recombinant DNA in vitro and in vivo are of great importance. However, these modified microorganisms have a great potential to address novel approaches to prevention and treatment of different human and animal pathological conditions.

References

  1. Culligan EP, Hill C, Sleator RD (2009) Probiotics and gastrointestinal disease: successes, problems and future prospects. Gut Pathog 1: 19.
  2. Shen J, Zuo ZX, Mao AP (2014) Effect of probiotics on inducing remission and maintaining therapy in ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and pouchitis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Inflamm Bowel Dis 20: 21-35.
  3. Sartor RB (2004) Therapeutic manipulation of the enteric microflora in inflammatory bowel diseases: antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics. Gastroenterology 126: 1620-1633.
  4. de Azevedo MS, Innocentin S, Dorella FA, Rocha CS, Mariat D, et al. (2013) Immunotherapy of allergic diseases using probiotics or recombinant probiotics. J ApplMicrobiol 115: 319-333.
  5. Serban DE (2014) Gastrointestinal cancers: influence of gut microbiota, probiotics and prebiotics. Cancer Lett 345: 258-270.
  6. Mandel DR, Eichas K, Holmes J (2010) Bacillus coagulans: a viable adjunct therapy for relieving symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis according to a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Complement Altern Med 10: 1.
  7. Sikorska H, Smoragiewicz W (2013) Role of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 42: 475-481.
  8. Sorokulova IB, Kirik DL, Pinchuk IV IV (1997) Probiotics against Campylobacter Pathogens. J Travel Med 4: 167-170.
  9. Wagner RD, Johnson SJ, Rubin DK (2009) Probiotic bacteria are antagonistic to Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter jejuni and influence host lymphocyte responses in human microbiota-associated immunodeficient and immunocompetent mice. MolNutr Food Res 53: 377-388.
  10. Mandal SM, Silva ON, Franco OL (2014) Recombinant probiotics with antimicrobial peptides: a dual strategy to improve immune response in immunocompromised patients. Drug Discov Today 19: 1045-1050.
  11. Sorokulova IB (1997) [A comparative study of the biological properties of Biosporin and other commercial Bacillus-based preparations]. Mikrobiol Z 59: 43-49.
  12. Wine E, Gareau MG, Johnson-Henry K, Sherman PM (2009) Strain-specific probiotic (Lactobacillus helveticus) inhibition of Campylobacter jejuni invasion of human intestinal epithelial cells. FEMS MicrobiolLett 300: 146-152.
  13. Volzing K, Borrero J, Sadowsky MJ, Kaznessis YN (2013) Antimicrobial peptides targeting Gram-negative pathogens, produced and delivered by lactic acid bacteria. ACS Synth Biol 2: 643-650.
  14. Borrero J, Jimenez JJ, Gutiez L, Herranz C, Cintas LM, et al. (2011) Use of the usp45 lactococcal secretion signal sequence to drive the secretion and functional expression of enterococcalbacteriocins in Lactococcuslactis. ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol 89: 131-143.
  15. Sandiford S, Upton M (2012) Identification, Characterization, and Recombinant Expression of Epidermicin NI01, a Novel Unmodified Bacteriocin Produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis That Displays Potent Activity against Staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56: 1539-1547.
  16. Saeidi N, Wong CK, Lo TM, Nguyen HX, Ling H, et al. (2011) Engineering microbes to sense and eradicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a human pathogen. MolSystBiol 7: 521.
  17. Sorokulova IB, Beliavskaia VA, Masycheva VA, Smirnov VV (1997) Recombinant probiotics: problems and prospects of their use for medicine and veterinary practice. VestnikRossiiskoiAkademiiMeditsinskikhNauk: 46-49.
  18. Chudnovskaya NV, Ribalko SL, Sorokulova IB, Smirnov VV, Belyavskaya VA (1995) Antiviral activity of Bacillus probiotics. Dopovidi Nac Acad Nauk Ukraini: 124-126.
  19. Beliavskaia VA, Cherdyntseva NV, Bondarenko VM, Litviakov NV (2003). Biological effects of interferon, produced by recombinant bacteria of the probiotic preparation Subalin. Zhurnalmikrobiologii, epidemiologii, iimmunobiologii: 102-109.
  20. Zegers ND, Kluter E, van Der Stap H, van Dura E, van Dalen P, et al. (1999) Expression of the protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis by Lactobacillus casei: towards the development of an oral vaccine against anthrax. J ApplMicrobiol 87: 309-314.
  21. Juarez-Rodriguez MD, Yang J, Kader R, Alamuri P, Curtiss R, et al. (2012). Live Attenuated Salmonella Vaccines Displaying Regulated Delayed Lysis and Delayed Antigen Synthesis to Confer Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 80: 815-831.
  22. Woodrow KA, Bennett KM, Lo DD (2012) Mucosal vaccine design and delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14: 17-46.
  23. Kong W, Brovold M, Koeneman BA, Clark-Curtiss J, Curtiss R (2012) Turning self-destructing Salmonella into a universal DNA vaccine delivery platform. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 109: 19414-19419.
  24. Wang S, Li Y, Shi H, Sun W, Roland KL, et al. (2011) Comparison of a regulated delayed antigen synthesis system with in vivo-inducible promoters for antigen delivery by live attenuated Salmonella vaccines. Infect Immun 79: 937-949.
  25. Mohamadzadeh M, Duong T, Sandwick SJ, Hoover T, Klaenhammer TR (2009) Dendritic cell targeting of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus protects mice from lethal challenge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 4331-4336.
  26. Wells JM, Mercenier A (2008) Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 349-362.
  27. Grangett C, Muller-Alouf H, Goudercourt D, Geoffroy MC, Turneer M, et al. (2001) Mucosal immune responses and protection against tetanus toxin after intranasal immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum. Infect Immun 69: 1547-1553.
  28. Hanniffy SB, Carter AT, Hitchin E, Wells JM (2007) Mucosal delivery of a pneumococcal vaccine using Lactococcuslactis affords protection against respiratory infection. J Infect Dis 195: 185-193.
  29. Foligne B, Dessein R, Marceau M, Poiret S, Chamaillard M, et al. (2007) Prevention and treatment of colitis with Lactococcuslactis secreting the immunomodulatory Yersinia LcrV protein. Gastroenterology 133: 862-874.
  30. Mohamadzadeh M, Durmaz E, Zadeh M, Pakanati KC, Gramarossa M, et al. (2010) Targeted expression of anthrax protective antigen by Lactobacillus gasseri as an anthrax vaccine. Future Microbiol 5: 1289-1296.
  31. Koo OK, Amalaradjou MA, Bhunia AK (2012) Recombinant probiotic expressing Listeria adhesion protein attenuates Listeria monocytogenes virulence in vitro. PLoS One 7: e29277.
  32. Lei H, Xu Y, Chen J, Wei X, Lam DM (2010) Immunoprotection against influenza H5N1 virus by oral administration of enteric-coated recombinant Lactococcuslactis mini-capsules. Virology 407: 319-324.
  33. Lagenaur LA, Sanders-Beer BE, Brichacek B, Pal R, Liu X, et al. (2011) Prevention of vaginal SHIV transmission in macaques by a live recombinant Lactobacillus. Mucosal Immunol 4: 648-657.
  34. Cutting SM, Hong HA, Baccigalupi L, Ricca E (2009) Oral vaccine delivery by recombinant spore probiotics. Int Rev Immunol 28: 487-505.
  35. Isticato R, Cangiano G, Tran HT, Ciabattini A, Medaglini D, et al. (2001) Surface display of recombinant proteins on Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 183: 6294-6301.
  36. Sorokulova IB, Krumnow AA, Pathirana S, Mandell AJ, Vodyanoy V (2008) Novel methods for storage stability and release of Bacillus spores. BiotechnolProg 24: 1147-1153.
  37. Sorokulova I (2008) Preclinical testing in the development of probiotics: a regulatory perspective with Bacillus strains as an example. Clin Infect Dis 46 Suppl 2: S92-95.
  38. Amuguni H, Tzipori S (2012) Bacillus subtilis: a temperature resistant and needle free delivery system of immunogens. Hum VaccinImmunother 8: 979-986.
  39. Duc le H, Hong HA, Atkins HS, Flick-Smith HC, Durrani Z, et al. (2007) Immunization against anthrax using Bacillus subtilis spores expressing the anthrax protective antigen. Vaccine 25: 346-355.
  40. Permpoonpattana P, Hong HA, Phetcharaburanin J, Huang JM, Cook J, et al. (2011) Immunization with Bacillus Spores Expressing Toxin A Peptide Repeats Protects against Infection with Clostridium difficile Strains Producing Toxins A and B. Infect Immun 79: 2295-2302.
  41. Hinc K, Isticato R, Dembek M, Karczewska J, Iwanicki A, et al. (2010) Expression and display of UreA of Helicobacter acinonychis on the surface of Bacillus subtilis spores. Microb Cell Fact 9: 2.
  42. Pinchuk IV, Sorokulova IB, Megraud, F, Urdaci MC (2002) Use of Bacillus subtilis strain CU1 as a vaccine delivery system for mucosal immunization against Helicobacter pylori infection in mice. Gut 51: 811.
  43. Mauriello EM, Duc le H, Isticato R, Cangiano G, Hong HA, et al. (2004) Display of heterologous antigens on the Bacillus subtilis spore coat using CotC as a fusion partner. Vaccine 22: 1177-1187.
  44. Lee S, Belitsky BR, Brinker JP, Kerstein KO, Brown DW, et al. (2010) Development of a Bacillus subtilis-based rotavirus vaccine. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 1647-1655.
  45. Cao YG, Li ZH, Yue YY, Song NN, Peng L, et al. (2013) Construction and evaluation of a novel Bacillus subtilis spores-based enterovirus 71 vaccine. Journal of Applied Biomedicine 11: 105-113.
  46. Hu B, Li C, Lu HJ, Zhu ZB, Du SW, et al. (2011) Immune responses to the oral administration of recombinant Bacillus subtilis expressing multi-epitopes of foot-and-mouth disease virus and a cholera toxin B subunit. Journal of Virological Methods 171: 272-279.
  47. Kim JH, Roh C, Lee CW, Kyung D, Choi SK, et al. (2007) Bacterial surface display of GFP(uv) on bacillus subtilis spores. J MicrobiolBiotechnol 17: 677-680.
  48. Potot S, Serra CR, Henriques AO, Schyns G (2010) Display of recombinant proteins on Bacillus subtilis spores, using a coat-associated enzyme as the carrier. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 5926-5933.
  49. Feng F, Hu P, Chen L, Tang Q, Lian C, et al. (2013) Display of human proinsulin on the Bacillus subtilis spore surface for oral administration. CurrMicrobiol 67: 1-8.
  50. Mao L, Jiang S, Li G, He Y, Chen L, et al. (2012) Surface display of human serum albumin on Bacillus subtilis spores for oral administration. CurrMicrobiol 64: 545-551.
  51. Koh M, Hanagata H, Ebisu S, Morihara K, Takagi H (2000) Use of Bacillus brevis for synthesis and secretion of Des-B30 single-chain human insulin precursor. BiosciBiotechnolBiochem 64: 1079-1081.
  52. Olmos-Soto J, Contreras-Flores R (2003) Genetic system constructed to overproduce and secrete proinsulin in Bacillus subtilis. ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol 62: 369-373.
  53. Steidler L (2002) In situ delivery of cytokines by genetically engineered Lactococcuslactis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82: 323-331.
  54. Steidler L, Hans W, Schotte L, Neirynck S, Obermeier F, et al. (2000) Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcuslactis secreting interleukin-10. Science 289: 1352-1355.
  55. Robert S, Gysemans C, Takiishi T, Korf H, Spagnuolo I, et al. (2014) Oral delivery of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-65 and IL10 by Lactococcuslactis reverses diabetes in recent-onset NOD mice. Diabetes 63: 2876-2887.
  56. Braat H, Rottiers P, Hommes DW, Huyghebaert N, Remaut E, et al. (2006) A phase I trial with transgenic bacteria expressing interleukin-10 in Crohn's disease. ClinGastroenterolHepatol 4: 754-759.
  57. Sorokulova IB (1998) [The safety and reactogenicity of the new probiotic subalin for volunteers]. Mikrobiol Z 60: 43-46.
  58. Berestovaya TG, Rudenko AA, Sorokulova IB, Muravskaya LV, Hunas IV, et al. (1999) Clinical efficacy of Subalin at meningoenzephalitis. Farmacologichniyvisnik 6: 24-28.
  59. Yershova IB (2014) Features of intestinal micro-biocenosis in viral hepatitis and possibilities of its correction. Actual Infectology 2: 7-11.
Citation: Sorokulova I (2014) Recombinant Probiotics: Future Perspectives in Disease Treatment. J Prob Health 2:e109.

Copyright: © 2014 Sorokulova I. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top