GET THE APP

Industrial CO2 Removal Using Carbonic Anhydrase: Potential, Promi
Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis

Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis
Open Access

ISSN: 2157-7544

+44 1300 500008

Short Communication - (2015) Volume 6, Issue 3

Industrial CO2 Removal Using Carbonic Anhydrase: Potential, Promise and Challenges

Brian P Mahon and Robert McKenna*
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA, E-mail: brianp@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author: Robert McKenna, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA, Tel: 3523925696 Email:

Atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) such as carbon dioxide (CO2), chloroflourocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide have been rising considerably due to human-induced processes [1]. One of the most abundant of the GHG is CO2, and a main contributor to a rise in global temperatures [2]. The burning of fossil fuels has sharply increased the concentration of atmospheric CO2 and has been correlated with increased global temperatures over the past century [3,4]. This presents a global threat that has recently been addressed by world leaders in the Paris Climate Talks [5] promoting an extensive effort to limit CO2 production in industrial processes and to slow the rate of climate change. Despite the recognition of these issues, implementation of large scale CO2 removal from the burning fossil-fuels has been limited [6]. Most of this is due to the use of harsh chemical processes and extreme temperatures to remove CO2, which translates to an energy and cost inefficient process [4,7]. Therefore, more efficient CO2 removal processes must be implemented. One such potential avenue is the utilization of enzymatic CO2 sequestration [8]. Specifically, the use of the enzyme, carbonic anhydrase (CA) for CO2 removal (CDR) has shown promise for its catalytic efficiency and its ability to be produced in large quantities from recombinant technology [7,9-11].

However, for a successful CA-mediated CDR, the enzyme must maintain its catalytic efficiency in extreme conditions, such as high temperature (up to 80°C), pressure, extreme pH levels (between pH 3 – 11), and more recently, resistance to anionic inhibition [10,12-16]. Furthermore, a mechanism to feasibly incorporate a CA-mediated CDR step in the fossil-fuel combustion process needs to be developed. To date, several possibilities have come in the form of CO2 absorbers containing immobilized CA resins, or bioreactors containing algae that over express CA, all of which have been extensively reviewed by Frost and McKenna et al. [17]. A model depicting a CA-mediated CO2 absorber is depicted in Figure 1 with favorable biochemical and biophysical characteristics of the enzyme highlighted.

thermodynamics-catalysis-CDR-processes

Figure 1: Model of a proposed CA-mediated CO2 absorber to be used in industrial CDR processes. Highlighted are specific biochemical and biophysical characteristics that would be ideal for a bio-catalytic CA (green) immobilized on a resin (shown as mesh) within a CO2 absorber. These would include: a compact and oligomeric structure to have thermal stability, exhibit enzyme activity in a broad pH range, and resistance to anionic inhibition (shown are common anions found in fossil-fuel combustion by-products). Figure was made in part using PyMol [22]. CA structure shown is that of the α-CA from Thiomicrospira crunogena (PDB: 4XZ5) [15].

Our group and others, have made efforts to characterize CAs from organisms that thrive in extreme environments [15,18] and utilize these biochemical and biophysical characteristics to engineer thermal and pH stable CA variants [11,19-21], to address the need for a suitable bio-catalytic CDR agent. Previously it has been shown: that truncating surface loops, the present of an intramolecular disulfide bond, and dimerization allows CA to maintain its catalytic activity at 70°C, and a range of pH (from pH 5-9) [15,20]. In addition, it has been shown that the presents of charged residues in the catalytic site of CA can contribute to the reduction in anionic inhibition (common anions found in fossil-fuel by-products and their CA inhibition constants are shown in Table 1). Although these parameters still fall short of the ideal characteristics of a CA-mediated CDR agent, they provide us with avenues which we can further exploit to engineer a useful candidate to reduce fossil-fuel produced CO2 emissions. Future studies will includes implementing an enzymatic design of an oligomeric and compact CA, that exhibits resistance to anionic inhibition, and retains its activity in a range of pH from 3-11 and temperatures up to 80°C (Figure 1) [13-16,18]. These results can further be combined with current designs to implement a CA-mediated CDR system and provide an energy and cost efficient process to limit atmospheric CO2. With the current global dependency on fossil-fuels for energy production, CA may provide a means to reduce human induced climate change.

Anion TcruCA hCA II SspCA
Ki(mM)a
Hg2+ 8.40 0.85 0.77
HSO3- 0.97 89 21.1
SO32- 7.6 7.5 2.3
HS- 0.70 0.04 0.58

TcruCA: α-CA isolated from Thiomicrospira crunogena XL2 [15]; hCA II: α-CA from humans (isoform II); SspCA: α-CA isolated from Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense YO3AOP1 [18]; aInhibition contstants adapted from Mahon et al. [14]

Table 1: Selected anion inhibition constants of CAs suggested as CDR-agents.

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005) IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; Metz, B., Ed, Cambridge University Press, for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge.
  2. Cesare C (2015) Paris Climate Talks, Day 12: What We’re Reading. Nature 2015.
  3. Leung DYC, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer MM (2014) An Overview of Current Status of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39: 426-443.
  4. Pierre AC (2012) Enzymatic Carbon Dioxide Capture. ISRN Chem. Eng. 2012: 1-22.
  5. Boone CD, Gill S, Habibzadegan A, McKenna R (2013) Carbonic Anhydrase: An Efficient Enzyme with Possible Global Implications. Int J Chem Eng 2013: 1-6.
  6. Favre N, Christ ML, Pierre AC (2009) Biocatalytic Capture of CO2 with Carbonic Anhydrase and Its Transformation to Solid Carbonate. J Mol Catal B Enzym 60: 163-170.
  7. Vullo D, Bhatt A, Mahon BP, McKenna R, Supuran CT, et al. (2015) Sulfonamide Inhibition Studies of the a-Carbonic Anhydrase from the Gammaproteobacterium Thiomicrospira Crunogena XCL-2, TcruCA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett.
  8. Frost SC, McKenna R (2014) Carbonic Anhydrase Mechanism, Regulation, Links to Disease, and Industrial Applications. Springer.
  9. Mirjafari P, Asghari K, Mahinpey N (2007) Investigating the Application of Enzyme Carbonic Anhydrase for CO2 Sequestration Purposes. Ind Eng Chem Res 46: 921-926.
  10. Schrodinger LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.2r3 pre, Schrödinger, LLC.
Citation: Mahon BP, McKenna R (2015) Industrial CO2 Removal Using CarbonicAnhydrase: Potential, Promise and Challenges. J Thermodyn Catal 6:156.

Copyright: © 2015 Mahon BP, et al. This is an open-access article distributedunder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permitsunrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal author and source are credited.
Top