GET THE APP

Genetic Patterns of rpsL and rrs Genes in Clinical Isolates of My
Mycobacterial Diseases

Mycobacterial Diseases
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-1068

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2017) Volume 7, Issue 1

Genetic Patterns of rpsL and rrs Genes in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Isfahan‚ Iran

Bahram Nasr Esfahani1, Hossein Mirhendi2, Fatemeh Riyahi Zaniani3, Mahshid Salehi4 and Sediqeh Karimi3*
1Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4Regional Tuberculosis Reference labratory, Isfahan, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Sediqeh Karimi, Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran, Tel: +98-9376759871 Email:

Abstract

Drug-resistant tuberculosis is considered a major universal problem. Based on knowledge on certain mutations occurring in Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome, drug resistance could be detected timely. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of the most common mutations likely to result from resistance to streptomycin in M. tuberculosis isolates, as well as genetic patterns of rpsL and rrs genes, in the province of Isfahan, Iran.

Clinical specimens were collected from individuals suspected of tuberculosis who referred to the Tuberculosis Center of Isfahan among whom 205 isolates were diagnosed with M. tuberculosis by conventional methods. The minimum inhibitory concentration of streptomycin in these isolates was determined with proportion method using Lowenstein- Jensen medium from which 10 isolates were recognized with streptomycin-resistant tuberculosis. The nucleotide sequence of rpsL and 530 loop of rrs genes were analyzed in all streptomycin-resistant isolates, in addition to five randomly selected streptomycin-susceptible isolates.

Six (6/10, 60%) streptomycin-resistant isolates represented a mutation in either rpsL gene and/or rrs530 loop. Four (40%) isolates showed rpsL mutations (codons 43 and 88), and two (20%) of them alterations in rrs gene (A514C and C517T). However, no mutation was found in streptomycin-susceptible isolates in either of the genes.

The study could successfully highlight the positive effects of rpsL and rrs mutations as molecular markers of streptomycin resistance in M. tuberculosis strains. Diversity and presence or absence of mutations suggested possible circulation of a variety of strains and the role of additional mechanisms contributing to strstreptomycin resistance in various regions.

Keywords: M. tuberculosis ; rpsL gene; rrs gene; streptomycin resistant; PCR

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the main lethal infectious diseases worldwide, with 9.6 million people affected and 1.5 million deaths, in 2014 [1]. Over 95% of TB deaths tend to occur in low- or middleincome countries (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/ en/). In Iran, the estimated incidence of all TB types was 17,000, case detection rate was 22 (per 100,000 population), and mortality rate of TB cases (all forms, excluding in HIV positive patients) was 3.5 (per 100,000 population), in 2014 (http://who.int/tb/country/data/ profiles/en/index.html). The disease still remains a global concern with an increasing rate due to drug-resistant TB [2]. Globally, about 3.3% of new and 20% of formerly treated cases were diagnosed as Multi-drugresistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB), with the rates remaining almost unchanged in recent years. In 2014, there were approximately 480,000 (range: 360,000–600,000) new cases of MDR-TB worldwide, and roughly 190,000 (range: 120,000–260,000) deaths from MDR-TB [3]. Among patients with pulmonary TB who were diagnosed in 2014, on average 300,000 (range: 220,000–370,000) suffered from MDR-TB. More than half of these patients were from India, China, and Russia. In Iran, there was approximately 0.8% (0.30–1.4%) of new TB cases with MDR-TB in the same year [3].

Streptomycin (STR), an aminocyclitol glycoside antibiotic, was the first drug to treat TB in the 1940s becoming the first-line antibiotic in all forms of TB. Two years after taking STR, in the same decade, M. tuberculosis showed resistance to STR due to the drug’s unique use and monotherapeutic application [4-6]. The resistance together with the drug’s strong adverse effects, such as ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, fetal auditory toxicity and neuromuscular paralysis, resulted in declines in its prescription in recent years [7,8]. Nevertheless, due to increases in MDR-TB strains worldwide, STR is still considered an integral component of TB treatment regimens. The medicine is still regarded as an important anti-TB drug in China and many third-world countries. It is the first-line agent in drug-resistance TB cases, susceptible to aminocyclitol glycoside antibiotic [2,8-10].

STR tends to exert its effect by inhibiting protein translation. It binds to ribosomal protein S12 and 16S rRNA gene, the components of 30S subunit of bacterial ribosome, by disrupting the relationship between the two components, interfering with proofreading system, and, finally, inhibiting protein synthesis. M. tuberculosis resistance to STR is generally associated with mutations in genes encoding these two constituents, i.e rpsL (encoding ribosomal protein S12), and rrs genes (encoding 16S rRNA). The most common mutations of rpsL and rrs genes have been showed in Table 1.

Gene Position
rpsL K43R (AAG→AGG)
K88R (AAG→AGG)
rrs 530 Loop
912 region

Table 1: The most common mutations in rpsL and rrs genes.

The most common mutation is likely to relate to K43R in rpsL gene. Approximately, 70% of STR-resistant M. tuberculosis strains have shown mutations in one of these genes. However, in the remaining strains, the cause of drug resistance remains unknown [11-23].

Rapid identification of drug resistance patterns of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates would be a requisite in prompt management of effective chemotherapy and proper initiation of TB treatment, and, as a result, prevention of DR-TB strain transmission. Since mutation pattern of the mentioned genes of M. tuberculosis strains isolated from patients in Isfahan was not determined prior to this study, the main goal here was to assess the frequency and types of mutation in rpsL and rrs genes of STR-resistant mycobacteria isolates, in this province.

Materials and Methods

Clinical specimens were collected from individuals suspected of TB who referred to the Tuberculosis Center of Isfahan from 2014 to 2015. Specimens were then decontaminated using N-acetyl-L-cysteine- NAOH and cultured on Lowensteine Jensen (L.J) medium [24].

M. tuberculosis colonies were identified with primary conventional standard phenotypic methods, considering features such as characteristics colony morphology, acid-fast staining, nitrate reduction, and niacin tests. M. tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 27294) was used as reference strain.

First-line drug susceptibility testing (DST) was carried out using conventional proportion method on L-J medium [25].

DNA of clinical isolates was collected from scraped colonies in 400 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and boiled at 80°C for 30 minutes to inactivate bacteria. Then, lysozyme/proteinase K cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method was used to extract DNA [26].

Subsequently, the extracted DNA was dissolved in TE buffer, its concentration was measured by spectrophotometry using Nanodrop (Biowave II, made in British), and stored at -20°C until being used [27].

Oligonucleotide primers used in PCR amplification genes were: rpsL -F 5' -ATGCCAACCATCCAGCAGCT-3' and rpsL-R 5' - CTTAGCGCCGTAACGGCTGC-3' for rpsL gene (12); rrs -F 5′- GTTGTAAACCTCTTTCACCATC-3' and rrs -R 5' - GTTGCATCGAATTAATCCAC-3' for rrs gene [28]. PCR mixtures contained 10 μl of HotStarTaq Master Mix (Amplicon, Denmark), 1 μM of each primer, 0.5 μl of template DNA and dd-water up to 20 μl reaction volume.

Amplifications were performed in T100Tm Thermal Cycler (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions: an initial step of 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 15 s at 94°C, 60°C for 30 s, 72°C for 60 s, and a final extension step for 7 min at 72°C. PCR products were loaded onto 1.5% agarose gel.

Negative (water instead of DNA( and positive (M. tuberculosis H37Rv ) controls were used in each set of PCR reactions. After purification, PCR products were sequenced using both forward and reverse primers of each gene, and the results were analyzed with ABI PRISM 370 × 1 Genetic Analyzer (Developed Biosystems, USA).

The sequencing results were analyzed with ChromasPro (ver. 2.4.4) and ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/) software. BLAST program was used to compare the sequences with those deposited in GenBank database corresponding with wild-type sequences of reference H37Rv strain at NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information, http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Results

A total of 205 M. tuberculosis isolates were examined, among whom 10 isolates (4.8%, including MDR isolates) were phenotypically STRresistant.

Among STR-resistant isolates, resistance to rifampin was identified in 4 (40%), to isoniazid in 6 (60%) and to ethambutol in 3 (30%) isolates (Figure 1). Finally, Multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis was found in 4 (40%) of the isolates (Figure 1).

mycobacterial-diseases-proportion-method

Figure 1: The frequency of drug resistance by proportion method in clinical STR-resistant isolates.

DNA fragments of 360 bp and 540 bp were seen in rpsL and rrs genes, respectively. After analyzing the sequences, in rpsL gene, one point mutation was identified in four (40%) of the isolates. Three isolates showed a substitution mutation at codon 43 (A→G, K43R), and one a substitution mutation at codon 88 (A→G, K88R) (Figure 2). In rrs gene, one point mutation was seen in two isolates. One isolate represented an A→C transversion at nucleotide position 514, and one a C→T transition at position 517 (Figure 3). In five STR susceptible isolates that were investigated randomly, no mutation was found in rpsL or rrs genes.

mycobacterial-diseases-frequency-mutations

Figure 2: The frequency of mutations of the rpsL gene identified by sequencing in clinical isolates.

mycobacterial-diseases-sequencing-clinical-isolates

Figure 3: The frequency of mutations of the rrs gene identified by sequencing in clinical isolates.

Discussion

STR is one of the main antibiotics prescribed for treating TB. Correlation of molecular resistance mechanisms with mutation in rpsL and rrs genes, regarded as genetic markers of resistance to SRT, has been reported in different areas of the world. In 2014, the total number of TB cases notified in Iran was 10395 [1]. The incidence of TB in Isfahan, one of the biggest provinces of Iran, was close to 7 cases per 100,000. In this study, 6 of the 10 (60%) examined isolates showed resistance to at least one of the first-line drugs and 4 (40%) were TBMDR. All rpsL and rrs gene mutations found in this study were reported in STR -resistant M. tuberculosis isolates previously, most of which were also reported with MDR. In rpsL gene, mutation at codon 43 accounted for 3 (30%) isolates and at codon 88 for 1 (10%). All four strains showed a similar amino acid change (Lys/Arg), due to an AAG AGG mutation. In rpsL , mutations were reported at codons 43 and 88, with K43R mutation being the most common. The detection rate of this mutation would vary considerably in different geographical areas, i.e 70.4% in China [16], 80.4% in Singapore [19], 52.8% in Korea [28,29], 42.9% in the North of India [30], 13.2% in Mexico [24], and 25% in Brazil [30], whereas in this study the rate was 30%. Mutations at codons 43 and 88 were frequently described in other investigations [19,22,31,32]. In rrs gene, the most common mutations were detected in two specific regions, i.e 530 stem-loops and 912 region [5,22,33-35]. In previous investigations, many different mutations were found in rrs . Although one of the most hot- spot regions of rrs gene (530 loop) was analyzed here, it seems possible for resistant isolates to experience mutations in other regions of this gene, as well.

Mutations in both of these genes were rarely observed to occur concurrently [11,19,24,]. Double mutants in both rpsL , and rrs genes were absent from the sample analyzed in this work. This could suggest that mutational variations in either rrs or rpsL might reduce the need for the modification of the other gene. Interestingly, 40% (4/10) of STR-resistant isolates showed no mutations in either of the two loci investigated in this study. This would be congruent with several other geographical areas such as Portugal (33.3%) [36], Mexico (52%) [37], Spain (62.3%) [38] and Poland (51%) [13].

In addition to rpsL and rrs , mutation in gidB gene (encoding ribosome methyltransferase) could be regarded as another reason for STR resistance. According to previous studies, mutations in rpsL gene were likely to be associated with a high-level of STR resistance, whereas mutations in rrs gene were shown to confer to an intermediate-level, and in gidB gene a low-level of STR resistance [11,17,20,7,35,38-40]. Mutations in rpsL, rrs and gidB genes were found in circa 70% of M. tuberculosis isolates that were resistant to STR [21,23]. In the research investigating the three-gene panel (rrs , rpsL , and gidB genes), the proportions of STR-resistant isolates with wild-type alleles at all three loci were almost similar, i.e 11.8% in Korea [41], 12.5% in Sierra Leone [42], 6.9% in Vietnam [27], 22% in Brazil [30] and 12.5% in Poland [7]. The portions were much lower than all studies cited above. It was suggested that variety, and presence or absence of rrs , rpsL and gidB mutations might be the result of variations in treatment schemes implemented by health authorities, design and duration of study, and study isolate collection period [16]. In addition, it has recently been shown that TB-Drug resistant genotypes circulating in any region could be significant contributors to variations in these mutations [19,20].

From the mentioned studies, it could be inferred that mechanisms except mutation in rrs , rpsL or gidB genes might result in STR resistance. One mechanism regarded changes in cell wall as leading to decreased permeability, and uptake or increased efflux of the drug [11]. However, further studies would be needed to confirm this mechanism and find other mechanisms causing STR resistance in M. tuberculosis strains.

Concluding Remarks

In the present study, 60% of STR isolates would experience mutation in rpsL and rrs genes. This might negatively affect the development of a molecular test on diagnosis of STR resistance. The occurrence of further mechanisms associated with STR resistance in studied isolates regions could also be suggested.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Manuchehr Homaee, the manager of the Tuberculosis Center of Isfahan Provincial Health Office and Hossein Khanahmad, a faculty member of the department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

References

  1. Organization WH (2015) Global tuberculosis report 2015. WHO/HTM/TB/2015.22. Geneva, WHO Press.
  2. Zhang T, Hu S, Li G, Li H, Liu X, et al. (2015) Evaluation of the MeltPro TB/STR assay for rapid detection of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 95: 162-169.
  3. Organization WH (2015) Global tuberculosis report 2015: World Health Organization.
  4. Crofton J, Mitchison D (1948) Streptomycin resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis. Br Med J 2: 1009-1015.
  5. Honore N, Cole ST (1994) Streptomycin resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38: 238-242.
  6. Comroe Jr JH (1978) Pay dirt: the story of streptomycin: Part II. Feldman and Hinshaw; Lehmann. Am Rev Respir Dis 117: 957-968.
  7. Jagielski T, Ignatowska H, Bakula Z, Dziewit L, Napiorkowska A, et al. (2014) Screening for streptomycin resistance-conferring mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Poland. PloS one 9: e100078.
  8. Sun H, Zhang C, Xiang L, Pi R, Guo Z, et al. (2016) Characterization of mutations in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Sichuan, China and the association between Beijing-lineage and dual-mutation in gidB. Tuberculosis 96: 102-106.
  9. Organization WH (2010) Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines: World Health Organization.
  10. Organization WH (2008) Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world, fourth global report: the WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance: World Health Organization.
  11. Meier A, Sander P, Schaper K, Scholz M, Bottger E (1996) Correlation of molecular resistance mechanisms and phenotypic resistance levels in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40: 2452-2454.
  12. Fukuda M, Koga H, Ohno H, Yang B, Hirakata Y, et al. (1999) Relationship between genetic alteration of the rpsL gene and streptomycin susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother 43: 281-284.
  13. Brzostek A, Sajduda A, Sliwinski T, Augustynowicz-Kopec E, Jaworski A, et al. (2004) Molecular characterisation of streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Poland. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis 8: 1032-1035.
  14. Ramaswamy SV, Dou SJ, Rendon A, Yang Z, Cave MD, et al. (2004) Genotypic analysis of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Monterrey, Mexico. J Med Microbiol 53: 107-113.
  15. Lipin M, Stepanshina V, Shemyakin I, Shinnick T (2007) Association of specific mutations in katG, rpoB, rpsL and rrs genes with spoligotypes of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Russia. Clin Microbiol Infect 13: 620-626.
  16. Shi R, Zhang J, Li C, Kazumi Y, Sugawara I (2007) Detection of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from China as determined by denaturing HPLC analysis and DNA sequencing. Microbes and Infection 9: 1538-1544.
  17. Spies FS, Da Silva PEA, Ribeiro MO, Rossetti ML, Zaha A (2008) Identification of mutations related to streptomycin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and possible involvement of efflux mechanism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 2947-2949.
  18. Sandgren A, Strong M, Muthukrishnan P, Weiner BK, Church GM, et al. (2009) Tuberculosis drug resistance mutation database. PLoS Med 6: e1000002.
  19. Sun YJ, Luo JT, Wong SY, Lee A (2010) Analysis of rpsL and rrs mutations in Beijing and non-Beijing streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Singapore. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 16: 287-289.
  20. Tudó G, Rey E, Borrell S, Alcaide F, Codina G, et al. (2010) Characterization of mutations in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in the area of Barcelona. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 2341-2346.
  21. Villellas C, Aristimuño L, Vitoria MA, Prat C, Blanco S, et al. (2013) Analysis of mutations in streptomycin-resistant strains reveals a simple and reliable genetic marker for identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype. J Clin Microbiol 51: 2124-2130.
  22. Sreevatsan S, Pan X, Stockbauer KE, Williams DL, Kreiswirth BN, et al. (1996) Characterization of rpsL and rrs mutations in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from diverse geographic localities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40: 1024-1026.
  23. Riska P, Jacobs J, Alland D (2000) Molecular determinants of drug resistance in tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 4: S4-S10.
  24. Cuevas-Córdoba B, Cuellar-Sánchez A, Pasissi-Crivelli A, Santana-Álvarez CA, Hernández-Illezcas J, et al. (2013) rrs and rpsL mutations in streptomycin-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Mexico. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 46: 30-34.
  25. Chaoui I, Sabouni R, Kourout M, Jordaan AM, Lahlou O, et al. (2009) Analysis of isoniazid, streptomycin and ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Morocco. J Infect Dev Ctries 3: 278-284.
  26. Van Embden J, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, et al. (1993) Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol 31: 406-409.
  27. Nhu NT, Lan NT, Phuong NT, Chau N, Farrar J, et al. (2012) Association of streptomycin resistance mutations with level of drug resistance and Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease: the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 16: 527-531.
  28. Jnawali HN, Yoo H, Ryoo S, Lee KJ, Kim BJ, et al. (2013) Molecular genetics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to aminoglycosides and cyclic peptide capreomycin antibiotics in Korea. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29: 975-982.
  29. Yadav R, Sethi S, Dhatwalia S, Gupta D, Mewara A, et al. (2013) Molecular characterisation of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from North India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 17: 251-257.
  30. Spies FS, Ribeiro AW, Ramos DF, Ribeiro MO, Martin A, et al. (2011) Streptomycin resistance and lineage-specific polymorphisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis gidB gene. J Appl Microbiol 49: 2625-2630.
  31. Katsukawa C, Tamaru A, Miyata Y, Abe C, Makino M, et al. (1997) Characterization of the rpsL and rrs genes of streptomycin-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Japan. J Appl Microbiol 83: 634-640.
  32. Tracevska T, Jansone I, Nodieva A, Marga O, Skenders G, et al. (2004) Characterisation of rpsL, rrs and embB mutations associated with streptomycin and ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Res Microbiol 155: 830-834.
  33. Finken M, Kirschner P, Meier A, Wrede A, Böttger EC (1993) Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol Microbiol 9: 1239-1246.
  34. Meier A, Kirschner P, Bange FC, Vogel U, Böttger E (1994) Genetic alterations in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: mapping of mutations conferring resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38: 228-233.
  35. Cooksey RC, Morlock GP, McQueen A, Glickman SE, Crawford JT (1996) Characterization of streptomycin resistance mechanisms among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients in New York City. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40: 1186-1188.
  36. Perdigao J, Macedo R, Joao I, Fernandes E, Brum L, et al. (2008) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Lisbon, Portugal: a molecular epidemiological perspective. Microb Drug Resist 14: 133-143.
  37. Cuevas-Cordoba B, Cuellar-Sanchez A, Pasissi-Crivelli A, Santana-Alvarez CA, Hernandez-Illezcas J, et al. (2013) rrs and rpsL mutations in streptomycin-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Mexico. Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection. Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi 46: 30-34.
  38. Abbadi SH, Sameaa GA, Morlock G, Cooksey R (2009) Molecular identification of mutations associated with anti-tuberculosis drug resistance among strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis 13: 673-678.
  39. Okamoto S, Tamaru A, Nakajima C, Nishimura K, Tanaka Y, et al. (2007) Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 63: 1096-1106.
  40. Via LE, Cho S-N, Hwang S, Bang H, Park SK, et al. (2010) Polymorphisms associated with resistance and cross-resistance to aminoglycosides and capreomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from South Korean Patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 48: 402-411.
  41. Ballif M, Harino P, Ley S, Coscolla M, Niemann S, et al. (2012) Drug resistance-conferring mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Madang, Papua New Guinea. BMC microbiology 12: 191.
  42. Feuerriegel S, Oberhauser B, George AG, Dafae F, Richter E, et al. (2012) Sequence analysis for detection of first-line drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from a high-incidence setting. BMC microbiology 12: 1.
Citation: Esfahani BN, Mirhendi H, Zaniani FR, Salehi M, Karimi S (2017) Genetic Patterns of rpsL and rrs Genes in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Isfahan, Iran. Mycobact Dis 7:235.

Copyright: © 2017 Esfahani BN, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top