GET THE APP

Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Heat-Stability During In
Journal of Probiotics & Health

Journal of Probiotics & Health
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-8901

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2017) Volume 5, Issue 2

Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Heat-Stability During Infant Formula Preparation

Rosita Aitoro BS1, Lorella Paparo BS1, Rita Nocerino RN1, Carmen Di Scala LDN1, Gaetano Polito MLT1 and Roberto Berni Canani1,2,3*
1Department of Translational Medical Science, Pediatric Section, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
2European Laboratory for the Investigation of Food Induced Diseases, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
3CEINGE-Advanced Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Roberto Berni Canani, MD, PhD, Director, Pediatric Allergy Program, Department of Translational Medical Science, Pediatric Section, University of Naples Federico II, Via S Pansini 5 80131 Naples, Italy, Tel: +390817462680 Email:

Abstract

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG survives in adequate amount after reconstitution of infant formulas according to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations. Our results suggest that an infant formula containing this probiotic could be efficiently used in Countries where FAO/ WHO recommendations are mandatory.

Keywords: Cow’s milk allergy; Formula preparation; Hypoallergenic formula

Abbreviations

CMA: Cow’s Milk Allergy; EHCF: Extensively Hydrolyzed Casein Formula; LGG: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; IgE: Immunoglobulin E; PIF: Preparation of Infant Formulas.

Introduction

Cow’s milk allergy (CMA) is among the most common food allergies in children [1]. In children with CMA, extensively hydrolysed casein formula (EHCF) supplemented with the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) has been shown to induce higher tolerance rates compared to EHCF without LGG and other formulas [2,3]. These results are consistent with the findings of another study that comparatively evaluated the use of EHCF supplemented with LGG with EHCF or amino-acid-based formula in the management of CMA in the US. The authors have demonstrated that more infants fed with EHCF supplemented with LGG were successfully managed by 12 months than those who were fed either of the other two formulas [4]. Multiple mechanisms may be responsible for the observed clinical effects. Preliminary data suggest that the dietary intervention with EHCF+LGG has positive effects on gut dysbiosis, short chain fatty acids production [5], and epigenetic regulation of Th1 and Th2 cytokine genes expression [6,7]. Such mechanisms suggest a possible longterm effect on the immune system of children with CMA treated with EHCF+LGG. In a randomised controlled trial (RCT) we demonstrated that a dietary intervention with EHCF supplemented with LGG could influence the occurrence of other atopic manifestations in children with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated CMA [8]. Concerns have been raised regarding LGG’s stability during powdered infant formula reconstitution according to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations. FAO/WHO recommend the following procedure for the preparation of infant formulas (PIF): 1) to boil a sufficient volume of safe water; 2) to pour the appropriate amount of boiled water into a cleaned and sterilised feeding bottle and allow to cool it slightly; 3) to dilute the powdered formula in water at a temperature of not below 70°C; 4) to cool bottle quickly to feeding temperature by holding under a running tap; and 5) to consume formula soon after each preparation [9]. Similar recommendations have been put forward by the UK Department of Health, the Finnish Food Safety Authority, Health Canada [10] and the European Food Safety Authority [11]. FAO/WHO recommendations outline the best practice for the safe preparation of infant formula in order to reduce the risk of infection in that developing country where recommendations are mandatory. In this study, we evaluated whether the LGG contained in EHCF could survive during the formula preparation procedure indicated by FAO/WHO.

Materials and Methods

According to FAO/WHO recommendations, we boiled drinking water for 10 min. Water was left at room temperature until a temperature of 70°C was achieved, then EHCF containing LGG powder (Nutramigen LGG, Mead Johnson Nutrition, Evansville IN, US) was dissolved in the bottle. The bottle was immediately cooled to feeding temperature by holding the bottom under a cold running tap. EHCF supplemented with LGG dissolved in water at room temperature served as the control. Samples were diluted 1:1000 in distilled water, and 100 μl of each sample was spread on the MRS agar plates as previously described [12]. The plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 72 h at 37°C. All experiments were performed in triplicate using two random selected batches.

Results

Manufacturer’s specification indicates an LGG concentration from 2.5 × 107 to 5 × 108 CFU/gr with a guaranteed level of 1.46 × 107 CFU/100 ml (approximately 1 × 106 CFU/gr). In line with our previous observation [2], we found a LGG concentration within this range in the control sample (5.3 × 108 CFU/100 ml). After EHCF containing LGG preparation according to FAO/WHO recommendations, the median total LGG count was 3.4 × 108, which exceeded the guaranteed level of CFU/100 ml (Figure 1). LGG concentration in EHCF at room temperature is 5.3 × 108 CFU/100 ml. After preparation according to FAO/WHO recommendations, LGG concentration is 3.4 × 108 CFU/100 ml. Guaranteed level (0.14 × 108 CFU/100 ml).

probiotics-health-hydrolysed-casein-formula

Figure 1: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) contained in extensively hydrolysed casein formula (EHCF) survives during the formula preparation procedure indicated by FAO/WHO.

Conclusion

Reconstitution of EHCF+LGG according to FAO/WHO recommendations for infant formula preparation allows an adequate degree of probiotic survival. Our results suggest that this dietary approach could also be efficiently adopted in Countries where FAO/ WHO recommendations are mandatory.

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Grant PE-2011-02348447).

References

  1. Sicherer SH (2011) Epidemiology of food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127: 594-602.
  2. Berni CR, Nocerino R, Terrin G, Anna C, Linda C, et al. (2012) Effect of Lactobacillus GG on tolerance acquisition in infants with cow's milk allergy: a randomized trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129: 580-582.
  3. Berni CR, Nocerino R, Terrin G, Tullio F, Sandra L, et al. (2013) Formula selection for management of children with cow milk allergy influences the rate of acquisition of tolerance: a prospective multicenter study. J Pediatr 163: 771-777.
  4. Ovcinnikova O, Panca M, Guest JF (2015) Cost-effectiveness of using an extensively hydrolyzed casein formula plus the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG compared to an extensively hydrolyzed formula alone or an amino acid formula as first-line dietary management for cow's milk allergy in the US. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 7: 145-152.
  5. Berni CR, Sangwan N, Stefka AT, Rita N, Lorella P, et al. (2016) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG supplemented formula expands butyrate producing bacterial strains in food allergic infants. ISME J 10: 742-750.
  6. Berni CR, Paparo L, Nocerino R, Linda C, Vincenza P, et al. (2015) Differences in DNA methylation profile of Th1 and Th2 cytokine genes are associated with tolerance acquisition in children with IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. Clin Epigenet 7: 38.
  7. Aitoro R, Simeoli R, Amoroso A, Paparo L, Nocerino R, et al. (2016) Extensively hydrolyzed casein formula alone or with L. rhamnosus GG reduces β-lactoglobulin sensitization in mice. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 28: 230-237.
  8. Berni CR, Di Costanzo M, Bedogni G, Amoroso A, Cosenza L, et al. (2016) Extensively hydrolyzed casein formula containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reduces the occurrence of other allergic manifestations in children with cow’s milk allergy: 3-year randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol, pii: S0091-6749[16]32487-3.
  9. Safe preparation, storage and handling of powdered infant formula (2007) Guidelines, World Health Organization.
  10. Pagotto FJ, Farber JM (2009) Cronobacter spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii): advice, policy and research in Canada. Int J Food Microbiol 136: 238-245.
  11. Birgit N (2004) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards on a request from the Commission related to the microbiological risks in infant formulae and follow-on formulae. The EFSA Journal 113: 1-35.
  12. Lu R, Fasano S, Madayiputhiya N, Morin NP, Nataro J, et al. (2009) Isolation, identification, and characterization of small bioactive peptides from Lactobacillus GG conditional media that exert both anti-gram-negative and gram-positive bactericidal activity. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 49: 23-30.
Citation: Rosita Aitoro BS, Lorella Paparo BS, Rita Nocerino RN, Carmen di Scala LDN, Gaetano Polito MLT, et al. (2017) Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Heat-Stability During Infant Formula Preparation. J Prob Health 5: 174.

Copyright: © 2017 Rosita Aitoro BS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top