GET THE APP

A New Era for Immunotherapeutic Approaches in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
Journal of Clinical Trials

Journal of Clinical Trials
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0870

+44 20 3868 9735

Commentary - (2016) Volume 6, Issue 1

A New Era for Immunotherapeutic Approaches in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment

Maria Elsa Gambuzza1*, Luca Soraci2, Vincenza Sofo2, Silvia Marino3 and Placido Bramanti3
1Ministry of Health, Territorial Office of Messina, Italy, E-mail: [email protected]
2Department of biomedical, dental, and image morphological and functional Sciences-University of Messina, Italy, E-mail: [email protected]
3IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy, E-mail: [email protected]
*Corresponding Author: Maria Elsa Gambuzza, Ministry of Health, Territorial Office of Messina, Italy, Tel: +39-065994-9384 Email:

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that many pathological conditions, including neurodegenerative disorders, are always the result of innate immune dysregulations. In multiple sclerosis (MS), innate immunity has shown induce proinflammatory responses, mainly mediated by specific innate immune receptors, as well as Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Interestingly, whereas activation of TLR-MyD88 dependent signaling pathway induces inflammation and MS progression, TLR3 activation MyD88 independent seems to play a beneficial effect, probably due to its ability to enhance endogenous IFN-β production, that in turn down regulates proinflammatory responses. Consequently, new therapeutic approaches based on TLR up and/or down regulation could offer promising results. In addition to several classes of TLR antagonists represented by different types of antibodies, nanobodies, mimetic molecules and RNAselective interference compounds, TLR3 agonists appear particularly interesting due to their capability of inducing IFN-β production. Among these, Ampligen® shows early promise, since it has shown positive results in several phase III trials for the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), an illness that shows remarkable levels of similarity with MS.

Introduction

The recent advances in understanding the important role played in the central nervous system (CNS) by innate immune cells, such as resident microglia and newly recruited bone-marrow derived cells, that allow active interactions between the immune and nervous systems [1], suggested invaluable mechanisms for several pathological conditions, including the neurodegenerative disorders, most of them have shown to be mainly caused by immune dysregulations. In multiple sclerosis (MS), innate immunity has recently shown to play a major role both in the initiation and progression of the disease, by influencing the effector functions of T and B cells [2-4]. In particular, numerous and recent studies have shown that inappropriate responses of specific receptors expressed by innate immune cells, as well as Tolllike receptors (TLRs), contribute to modulate MS course. Whereas the activation of most TLRs, including TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, and TLR9 through MyD88-dependent signaling pathway, mediates MS progression, TLR3 activation, through MyD88-independent and TRIFdependent pathway, has shown to protect from the murine model of MS, represented by experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [5-6]. The positive role played by TLR3 activation is probably due to its capability of inducing, through a MyD88-independent pathway, endogenous IFN-β production, that appears to directly increase expression and concentration of anti-inflammatory agents while down regulating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. Altogether, the recent advances obtained by the researchers about the role of TLR biology in MS have led to potential new therapeutic approaches to counteract the disease, manly based on TLR up and/or down regulation with specific agonists and/or antagonists and by inhibiting intracellular proteins involved in the cascade signaling pathways [7]. Novel therapeutics able to modulate immune responses through TLRs has been developed by several international companies. The most known class of TLR antagonists is represented by different types of murine, humanized and recombinant antibodies already approved for clinical use in other diseases. Among these, the class of nanobodies (VHH-based single variable domains) with very long complementary determining regions 3 (CDR3), are capable of inhibiting efficiently different protein antigens. Due their small size (12-15 kDa), nanobodies have several additional advantages compared to conventional antibodies (150-160 kDa), such as their extreme stability towards changes in temperature and chemical environments, and resistance to extreme pH levels. Because of their reduced size, nanobodies can penetrate tissues and cells faster than the conventional antibodies, being also capable of breaking through the brain's blood barrier, abilities that make them suitable for CNS therapies.

Other receptor antagonists are represented by mimetic molecules of short amino acid sequences, able to prevent the interaction of prototype proteins with their partners. Among these, specific “decoy peptides” have shown to block selectively TLR signaling pathways, by inhibition of TIR-TIR interactions via structural mimicry, due to three-dimensional fold similarities with TIR structures of specific TLRs [8]. Mimetic TLR inhibitors have been also developed to prevent homo- or hetero-dimerization of TLRs. Antagonistic molecules directed against intracellular TLRs, including TLR3, TLR7 and TLR9, are mainly represented by single stranded DNA or RNA molecules. Among these, the aptamers, obtained by “in vitro” selection processes from combinatorial libraries, have been widely used in various biomedical applications. In particular, the aptamers obtained using immunoprecipitation strategy together to exponential enrichment (SELEX), appear to selectively inhibit endosomal TLR-mediated pathways responsible for inappropriate or excessive inflammation in multiple diseases [9-10]. More recently, small RNA-selective interference compounds have been obtained by using predictive modeling methods [11]. These novel techniques will allow to also obtaining efficient interference RNA-based TLR modulators [12]. Altogether, the modulation of TLR expression with small molecules acting as TLR-agonists/antagonists represents an innovative and attractive approach in MS therapy. The use of TLR-targeting drugs is also promoted by their fewer side effects and lower or no toxicity, compared with other drugs commonly used in MS treatment. This represents an important feature, since MS is a chronic disease that requires long-term treatments.

Among the most promising immunotherapeutics TLR-targeting suitable to be used in MS therapy, TLR3 agonists play a leading role, mainly due to their capability of inducing endogenous IFN-β production [13-16]. TLR3 is triggered by dsRNA with a minimum size of at least 50 base pairs and by specific endogenous ligands, as well as the endosomial microtubule regulator stathmin [17]. Much recent evidence supports the positive role showed by TLR3/TRIF mediated pathway. In EAE mice, TLR3 stimulation induces the inhibition, IL27- mediated, of Th17 cells, that are known to play a critical role in the disease [18-20]. In addition, high levels of IFN, that significantly reduced disease severity, were detected in EAE mice inoculated intraperitoneally with the synthetic TLR3 agonist poly (I): poly (C) acid [21].

Among the investigational compounds TLR3-targeting, the mismatched double-stranded RNA molecule Ampligen® [22] could offer promise in MS therapy. Ampligen® is a mismatched dsRNA with a high specificity of binding to TLR3, with a subsequent selective activation of genes for IFNs, 2-5 adenylate synthetase, and protein kinase (p68) [23,24]. In contrast to the original molecule, developed in the 1960s by Merck and Co. to reduce tumor formation, and that resulted extremely toxic, the new compound was modified by Johns Hopkins University researchers and made less toxic by adding uridylic acid molecules at specific intervals along the dsRNA chain, so obtaining a particular dsRNA, denoted poly (I): poly (C12U), wherein one of the two polyribonucleotides is polyriboinosinic acid and the other is polyribocytidyl C12, uridylic acid. This new compound, called Ampligen® (for AMPLIfied GENetic activity), capable of stimulating IFN production like poly (I): poly (C), had smaller and rugged molecular structure, and appeared more resistant to molecular unfolding, including denaturation and branching, and this led to an increase in bioactivity, due to higher ability to bind TLR3.

Ampligen® is currently in phase III clinical trial in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), an illness that shows remarkable levels of similarity with MS. Indeed, both disorders, show remarkable phenomenological and neuroimmune overlaps [25]. The neuroimmune similarities between MS and CFS/ME are mainly based on shared immunoinflammatory oxidative and nitrosative stress, autoimmune and mitochondrial pathways. Other remarkable levels of similarity concern “the findings produced by neuroimaging techniques, that appear quite similar in both illnesses and show decreased cerebral blood flow, atrophy, gray matter reduction, whit matter hyperintensities, increased cerebral lactate and choline signaling, and lowered acetyl-aspartate levels” [26]. However, the main evidence base supporting the use of Ampligen® in MS therapy is because TLR3 stimulation leads to endogenous induction of IFNβ that has shown to prevent inflammation and demyelination and to also possess neuroprotective activity [27]. In addition, unlike the exogenous IFN used in MS therapy, it does not induce neutralizing antibodies that reduce effectiveness [28,29].

Conclusions and Future Directions

Despite the several therapies proposed to treat MS, none of them has shown to be completely effective. In every case, a strong inflammatory response, TLR-mediated, appears to contribute to this autoimmune disease. Then, a selective inhibition of specific TLRs can provide a proposing device to prevent initiation and progression of MS. In contrast, TLR3 stimulation can improve the MS course, due its ability to enhance IFNβ production. We can conclude that TLR modulation with small molecules acting as TLR-agonists/antagonists might represent an alternative and attractive approach in MS therapy. Another winning point of TLR-targeting drug is that they not show important side effects and toxicity compared with drugs commonly used in MS treatment. This represents an important feature in the therapy of this chronic autoimmune disease that always involves young people who will be compelled to continue the therapy for the rest of their lives.

References

  1. Ousman SS, Kubes P (2012) Immune surveillance in the central nervous system. Nat Neurosci 15: 1096-1101.
  2. Sospedra M, Martin R (2005) Antigen-specific therapies in multiple sclerosis. Int Rev Immunol 24: 393-413.
  3. Weiner HL (2008) A shift from adaptive to innate immunity: a potential mechanism of disease progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 255 Suppl 1: 3-11.
  4. Gandhi R, Laroni A, Weiner HL (2010) Role of the innate immune system in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 221: 7-14.
  5. Weiner HL (2004) Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Arch Neurol 61: 1613-1615.
  6. Marta M (2009) Toll-like receptors in multiple sclerosis mouse experimental models. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1173: 458-462.
  7. Xiang W, Chao ZY, Feng DY (2015) Role of Toll-like receptor/MYD88 signaling in neurodegenerative diseases. Rev Neurosci 26: 407-414.
  8. Iwami KI, Matsuguchi T, Masuda A, Kikuchi T, Musikacharoen T, et al. (2000) Cutting edge: naturally occurring soluble form of mouse Toll-like receptor 4 inhibits lipopolysaccharide signaling. J Immunol 16 662-668.
  9. Chang YC, Kao WC, Wang WY, Wang WY, Yang RB, et al. (2009) Identification and characterization of oligonucleotides that inhibit Toll-like receptor 2-associated immune responses. FASEB J 23: 3078-3088.
  10. Sullivan T, Atiee G, Bhagat L, Jiang W, Kandimalla E, et al. (2010) Safety and pharmacodynamics of IMO-3100, a novel Toll-like receptor antagonist for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, in a rising single dose phase I clinical trial. 6th Annual Meeting of the Oligonucleotide Therapeutic Society being Held in Dana Point, California.
  11. Vaishnaw AK, Gollob J, Gamba-Vitalo C, Hutabarat R, Sah D, et al. (2010) A status report on RNAi therapeutics. Silence 1: 14.
  12. Chang CI, Lee TY, Kim S, Sun X, Hong SW, et al. (2012) Enhanced intracellular delivery and multi-target gene silencing triggered by tripodal RNA structures. J Gene Med 14: 138-146.
  13. Miranda-Hernandez S, Baxter AG (2013) Role of toll-like receptors in multiple sclerosis. Am J Clin Exp Immunol 2: 75-93.
  14. Gambuzza M, Licata N, Palella E, Celi D, Foti Cuzzola V, et al. (2011) Targeting Toll-like receptors: emerging therapeutics for multiple sclerosis management. J Neuroimmunol 239: 1-12.
  15. Black KE, Collins SL, Hagan RS, Hamblin MJ, Chan-Li Y, et al. (2013) Hyaluronan fragments induce IFN? via a novel TLR4-TRIF-TBK1-IRF3-dependent pathway. J Inflamm (Lond) 10: 23.
  16. Liu L, Botos I, Wang Y, Leonard JN, Shiloach J, et al. (2008) Structural basis of toll-like receptor 3 signaling with double-stranded RNA. Science 320: 379-381.
  17. Fitzgerald DC, Ciric B, Touil T, Harle H, Grammatikopolou J, et al. (2007) Suppressive effect of IL-27 on encephalitogenic Th17 cells and the effector phase of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 179: 3268-3275.
  18. Aranami T, Yamamura T (2008) Th17 Cells and autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE/MS). Allergol Int 57: 115-120.
  19. Guo B, Chang EY, Cheng G (2008) The type I IFN induction pathway constrains Th17-mediated autoimmune inflammation in mice. J Clin Invest 118: 1680-1690.
  20. Touil T, Fitzgerald D, Zhang GX, Rostami A, Gran B (2006) Cutting Edge: TLR3 stimulation suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inducing endogenous IFN-beta. J Immunol 177: 7505-7509.
  21. Carter WA (2014) Double-stranded ribonucleic acids with rugged physico-chemical structure and highly specific biologic activity. Unites states patent.
  22. Geiss G, Jin G, Guo J, Bumgarner R, Katze MG, et al. (2001) A comprehensive view of regulation of gene expression by double-stranded RNA-mediated cell signaling. J Biol Chem 276: 30178-30182.
  23. Suhadolnik RJ, Reichenbach NL, Hitzges P, Sobol RW, Peterson DL, et al. (1994) Upregulation of the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L antiviral pathway associated with chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 18: S99-104.
  24. Morris G, Maes M (2013) Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and encephalomyelitis disseminata/multiple sclerosis show remarkable levels of similarity in phenomenology and neuroimmune characteristics. BMC Med 11: 205.
  25. Karussis D1 (2014) The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the various related demyelinating syndromes: a critical review. J Autoimmun 48-49: 134-42.
  26. Gambuzza M, Licata N, Palella E, Celi D, Foti Cuzzola V, et al. (2011) Targeting Toll-like receptors: emerging therapeutics for multiple sclerosis management. J Neuroimmunol 239: 1-12.
  27. Gooshe M, Abdolghaffari AH, Gambuzza ME, Rezaei N (2014) The role of Toll-like receptors in multiple sclerosis and possible targeting for therapeutic purposes. Rev Neurosci 25: 713-739.
Citation: Gambuzza ME, Soraci L, Sofo V, Marino S, Bramanti P (2016) A New Era for Immunotherapeutic Approaches in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment. J Clin Trials 6:253.

Copyright: © 2016 Gambuzza ME, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.