GET THE APP

Why has Nature Chosen Lutein and Zeaxanthin to Protect the Retina
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9570

+44 1223 790975

Review Article - (2014) Volume 5, Issue 1

Why has Nature Chosen Lutein and Zeaxanthin to Protect the Retina?

Justyna Widomska1 and Witold K Subczynski2*
1Department of Biophysics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
2Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
*Corresponding Author: Witold K Subczynski, Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA, Tel: 414-955-4038, Fax: 414-955-6512 Email:

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is associated with a low level of macular carotenoids in the eye retina. Only two carotenoids, namely lutein and zeaxanthin are selectively accumulated in the human eye retina from blood plasma where more than twenty other carotenoids are available. The third carotenoid which is found in the human retina, meso-zeaxanthin is formed directly in the retina from lutein. All these carotenoids, named also macular xanthophylls, play key roles in eye health and retinal disease. Macular xanthophylls are thought to combat lightinduced damage mediated by reactive oxygen species by absorbing the most damaging incoming wavelength of light prior to the formation of reactive oxygen species (a function expected of carotenoids in nerve fibers) and by chemically and physically quenching reactive oxygen species once they are formed (a function expected of carotenoids in photoreceptor outer segments). There are two major hypotheses about the precise location of macular xanthophylls in the nerve fiber layer of photoreceptor axons and in photoreceptor outer segments. According to the first, macular xanthophylls transversely incorporate in the lipid-bilayer portion of membranes of the human retina. According to the second, macular xanthophylls are protein-bound by membrane-associated, xanthophyll-binding proteins. In this review we indicate specific properties of macular xanthophylls that could help explain their selective accumulation in the primate retina with special attention paid to xanthophyll-membrane interactions.

Keywords: Macular xanthophylls; Carotenoid; Lutein; Zeaxanthin; Membrane domain; Lipid bilayer; AMD

Introduction

Carotenoids form a group of more than 750 naturally occurring organic pigments [1], only 40 of which are present in the typical human diet [2], and about 20 of them have been detected in human plasma and tissues [3]. Carotenoids can be divided into two main classes: carotenes and xanthophylls. Carotenes are non-polar molecules, which contain only carbon and hydrogen atoms and xanthophylls are polar carotenoids, which contain at least one oxygen atom. In addition, xanthophylls can be subdivided into hydroxyl-carotenoids containing one or two hydroxyl groups and keto-carotenoids containing ketone groups. Unexpectedly, only two carotenoids, namely lutein and zeaxanthin (Figure 1), are selectively accumulated in the membranes of retina from blood plasma, where more than 20 other carotenoids are available. Another carotenoid, meso-zeaxathin (which is a stereoisomer of zeaxanthin, (Figure 1)), is converted from lutein within the retina [4]. The position of the double bond in one of the rings in lutein and zeaxanthin molecules creates differences in retinal distribution of these two pigments in the retina. Zeaxanthin dominates the center region, whereas lutein is dominant in the peripheral region of the retina [5]. In human retina, the concentration of carotenoids reaches a level between 0.1 and 1 mM in the central fovea [6,7], which is about 1000 times higher than in other tissues. Both xanthophylls are accumulated in the region of photoreceptor axons [7] and within photoreceptor outer segments (POSs) [8,9]. Although, macular xanthophylls in POS constitute about 10 to 25% of the amount in the entire retina [8,9], the local concentration of macular xanthophylls in membranes of the rod outer segment is ~70% higher than in residual retina membranes [9]. Moreover, Müller cells have also been suggested as a place for xanthophylls accumulation [10].

clinical-ophthalmology-macular-dietary

Figure 1: Chemical structures of macular xanthophylls: lutein, zeaxanthin, meso -zeaxanthin and two dietary carotenoids: nonpolar β-carotene and mono-polar β-cryptoxanthin.

The selective uptake of macular xanthophylls into the retina suggests involvement of xanthophyll-binding proteins. It is not clear whether macular xanthophylls are transversely incorporated in the lipid-bilayer portion of retina membranes, or are bound by membrane-associated xanthophyll-binding proteins. Some of the xanthophyll-binding proteins have already been identified and characterized including; GSTP1 (glutathione S-transferases), zeaxanthin-binding protein [11] and 3 StARD3 (steroidogenic acute regulatory domain protein3), lutein-binding protein [12]. The question is whether these proteins are only selective transporters of macular xanthophylls, or whether they are proteins that can store xanthophylls. There is also a significant question of whether the amount of these proteins is sufficient to bind and to store all xanthophyll molecules, which accumulate in the retina in extremely high concentrations. Both interactions of lutein and zeaxanthin with lipid-bilayer membranes and specific proteins are significant. However, in this review, we will focus on xanthophyll–membrane interactions.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is multifactorial and a complex disease. However, ageing and oxidative stress seem to be major determinants in pathogenesis. Many epidemiological studies suggest that the higher consumption of lutein and zeaxanthin is associated with lower risk of AMD [13-15]. Such a protective role is attributed to an action of these xanthophylls as antioxidants. There is a huge literature reporting that carotenoids protect phospholipids from peroxidation and that they are efficient singlet oxygen quenchers [16-21]. Why has nature chosen only lutein and zeaxanthin from other carotenoids to protect retina? Chemically they are very similar. The ability of these xanthophylls to filter out blue light (all carotenoids absorb blue/green light) [22] and to quench singlet oxygen (in organic solution the quenching rate constant depends on the number of conjugated double bonds) is not better than that of other plasma carotenoids [21,23]. Therefore, it must be some specific property or properties of these xanthophylls that could help explain their selective presence in the retina. One such property is their disposition and behavior in membranes [24-27]. There are suggestions in the literature that the segregation of polar and non-polar carotenoids already occurs on the level of carotenoid transport. Non-polar carotenoids are transported in human blood plasma primarily in low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), whereas more polar carotenoids are more evenly distributed between LDLs and high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) [28,29]. It is thought that most tissues obtain carotenoids via the LDL receptor route [29]. However, in the case of lutein and zeaxanthin transport, we believe that receptors for HDL should be involved instead. It has been suggested that this role can be played by receptors that are similar to those found in the central nervous system for HDL particles containing ApoE [28,30]. In this review we consider other factors which distinguish lutein and zeaxanthin from other carotenoids in their protective actions against light stress and oxidation in lipid membranes of the retina.

Xanthophyll-membrane Interactions

The protective function of macular xanthophylls is highly correlated to their membrane localization, in particular, with their membrane solubility, orientation, and distribution between membrane domains. Below, we will present data which support our hypothesis that the high solubility, specific orientation within the lipid bilayer, and the unique lateral distribution between membrane domains of macular xanthophylls maximize their protective action in the eye retina.

Solubility

Macular xanthophylls are well soluble in lipid bilayers. The reported xanthophyll solubility thresholds (concentration of xanthophylls at which aggregation initiates) in fluid-phase model membranes lie in the area of 10 mol% for zeaxanthin and 15% for lutein [31], but values as high as 17 mol% [32] and 28 mol% [33] have been reported. A lower value such as 5 mol% was also reported for zeaxanthin incorporated into unilamellar vesicle formed with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine [34]. Non-polar ß-carotene starts to aggregate at a concentration as low as 0.5 mol% [35]. Mono-polar ß-cryptoxanthin is also less soluble in the lipid bilayer than macular xanthophylls [27]. Interestingly, the tendency of cis-isomers of xanthophylls to aggregate is usually much less than their all-trans counterparts [36,37], and they also affect membrane properties more strongly [38]. Based on the solubility measurements, we can make a first conclusion: the high membrane solubility of macular xanthophylls is one of the major characteristics that distinguish them from other dietary carotenoids.

There are two problems which we would like to mention here. The first is dealing with terminology. In earlier papers the terms “solubility” and “incorporation” were often used interchangeably. In our discussion we use the term “solubility” to refer to the amount of carotenoids dissolved in the lipid bilayer as monomers, while the term “incorporation” refers to the amount of carotenoids present in the lipid bilayer in the form of monomers, dimers, oligomers and aggregates. Socaciu et al. [39] measured the incorporation ratio of different carotenoids in different membranes. They found high incorporation for xanthophylls and low incorporation for ß-carotene. The second problem is dealing with the membrane preparation. To the best of our knowledge, in most, if not all papers, the solubility and aggregation of carotenoids were investigated in membranes prepared using the film deposition method [40] or some variations of this method. During membrane preparations using the film deposition method, the lipid mixture passed through the solid-state intermediate at which solid-state demixing of carotenoids can occur. Carotenoid molecules, which can be trapped in carotenoid aggregates during this preparation, do not participate in further liposome formation producing false estimates of carotenoid solubility thresholds. This can explain large scattering of data about carotenoids solubility in lipid bilayers. This problem was faced during measurements of cholesterol solubility in model membranes and was solved with the new method of membrane preparation, namely the rapid solvent exchange method [41,42].

Transmembrane localization

The transmembrane localization of a significant portion of macular xanthophylls in retinal cells seems to be obvious [43-48]. The presence of polar hydroxyl groups at the ends of macular xanthophyll molecules (Figure 1) ensures their perpendicular or close to perpendicular orientation in the bilayer. Non-polar carotenoids are oriented rather randomly [49]. Macular xanthophylls with this transmembrane orientation and high membrane solubility affect membrane properties strongly. In particular, they decrease membrane fluidity [27,45,46,50], especially decreasing strongly the frequency of vertical fluctuations of the terminal methyl groups of alkyl chains toward the membrane surface [51]. At a high concentration, macular xanthophylls induce formation of the liquid-ordered phase in model membranes [50], an action similar to that caused by cholesterol [52]. They also cause a considerable increase of hydrophobicity of the membrane interior [53], which strongly affects ion penetration into the membrane. Most significantly macular xanthophylls reduce the oxygen concentration and oxygen diffusion at all locations in the membrane [50,54]. This effect will be discussed in Section: Oxygen concentration and diffusion.

The changes in the membrane properties should affect chemical reactions occurring within the lipid bilayer. Often these changes make membranes less sensitive to oxidative damage (these problems are discussed in a review [55] and in Section: Xanthophylls impede light-induced damage to retina). The transmembrane localization of macular xanthophylls in retinal membranes can also explain their very slow removal from the retina, observed after discontinuation of xanthophyll supplements given to healthy volunteers [56]. These observations suggest that anchoring xanthophyll molecules at opposite membrane surfaces is significant not only in enhancing their effects on membrane properties [27,47,48], but also in stabilization of these molecules in membranes of the human retina. Thus, we can summarize: transmembrane orientation of macular xanthophylls distinguishes them from other dietary carotenoids, enhances their stability in retina membranes, and maximizes their protective action in the eye retina.

Distribution between membrane domains

In the above sections we emphasized effects of membrane modifiers (macular xanthophylls) on membrane properties. These effects can change drastically with membrane composition and depth in the lipid bilayer [27]. Also the membrane itself, especially membrane lateral organization into membrane domains, can affect lateral distribution of membrane modifiers, including macular xanthophylls. It has been shown that in membranes of retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors, raft domains are present [57-60]. Raft domains have been postulated to enhance signal transduction [61-63], and are also involved in lipid sorting [64] and protein trafficking/recycling [59,65]. Rafts in membranes of photoreceptor cells are involved in regulation of the G-protein-mediated pathway of photo-transduction [59]. Aggregation of small, unstable rafts in bigger platforms (observed, for example, in retinal pigment epithelium cells) is supposed to enhance signal transduction to the cell interior and cause a specific reaction in the cell, such as apoptosis [66].

Raft domains in photoreceptor outer segment (POS) disc membranes are surrounded by the bulk lipid domain rich in long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids including docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) with a six double-bond chain [8,67,68]. Also, rhodopsin, which is the main protein of POS membranes and is responsible for the first stages of visual signal transduction, is located in the bulk domain of the POS membrane [57,58,68,69]. Rhodopsin requires the presence of polyunsaturated lipids (DHA) for its activity [70-72], and thus their co-localization is functionally justified. In the model of POS membranes, macular xanthophylls were about 14 times more concentrated in the bulk domain (enriched in polyunsaturated DHA) and were substantially excluded from the raft domain (enriched in saturated lipids and cholesterol) [26] (Figure 2). This unique distribution was confirmed in membranes made of a raft-forming mixture where macular xanthophylls were about eight times more concentrated in the bulk domain than in the raft domain [73]. A similar distribution has been observed for mono-polar xanthophyll, namely ß-cryptoxanthin. However, non-polar ß-carotene was more uniformly distributed between domains [24]. These results strongly support statements that in POS membranes macular xanthophylls will also be concentrated in the bulk domain and excluded from the raft domain. Such a selective accumulation of macular xanthophylls in domains rich in vulnerable unsaturated lipids seems to be ideal for their antioxidant action [24]. Thus, we can hypothesize that co-localization of macular xanthophylls, polyunsaturated phospholipids, and rhodopsin in POS membranes (Figure 2) may enhance the antioxidant action of xanthophylls. This hypothesis was confirmed by experiments in which the protective role of lutein against lipid peroxidation in membranes made of raft forming mixtures and in models of POS membranes was compared to lutein antioxidant action in homogenous membranes composed of unsaturated lipids [74].

clinical-ophthalmology-bulk-domain

Figure 2: Schematic drawing showing the distribution of macular xanthophylls between the saturated raft domain and the unsaturated bulk domain in membranes of POSs. Rhodopsin is also included to show its co-localization with unsaturated lipids and xanthophylls.

The rate of lipid peroxidation was inhibited in the presence of lutein, and inhibition was significantly greater in membranes containing raft domains than in homogenous membranes (Figure 3). We can conclude: the domain structure allows location of macular xanthophylls in the most vulnerable regions of POS membranes. This localization is ideal if macular xanthophylls are to act as a lipid antioxidant, which is the most accepted mechanism through which lutein and zeaxanthin protect the retina from AMD [75-78].

clinical-ophthalmology-equimolar-mixtre

Figure 3: Comparison of the antioxidant activity of the macular xanthophyll, lutein, in raft-domain-containing and homogeneous membranes. Antioxidant activity is expressed as (A) a ratio of the rate of lipid hydroperoxide accumulation in membranes in the absence and presence of 0.1 mol% lutein, as a ratio of the oxygen consumption rate in membrane suspension in the absence and presence of (B) 0.3 mol% and (C) 0.5 mol% lutein, and (D) as a ratio of the MDA-TBA adduct accumulation rate in the absence and presence of 0.5 mol% lutein. Homogeneous membranes were made of dioleoylphospatidylcholine (DOPC) (A, B, and C) and didocosahexaenoylphosphatidylcholine (DHAPC) (D). Raftdomain- containing membranes were made of DOPC/ sphingomyelin/cholesterol equimolar mixtre (A, B, and C) and DHAPC/distearoylphosphatidylcholine/cholesterol equimolar mixture (D). For more details see Ref. [74].

Xanthophylls Impede Light-induced Damage to Retina

Light absorption

There are two main functional explanations for the selective presence of lutein and zeaxanthin in the retina. One is the necessity of photoprotection against the oxidative stress and macular xanthophylls serve that role very well. Another functional hypothesis is based on the fact that the pigments are localized mostly in the outer plexiform also known as Henle’s layer [43] and therefore form a filter for blue light. Most ultraviolet below 300 nm is absorbed by cornea [78], whereas ultraviolet in range 300-400 nm is blocked by the lens. Light transmission by the lens decreases with ageing, particularly at shorter wavelengths [79]. Nevertheless, some fraction of blue radiation reaches the retina and may activate potent photosensitizers retinal photosensitizers such as all-trans retinal, cytochrome c oxidase, porphyrins [80-83], and consequently generates reactive species. Macular xanthophylls, due to their appropriate location, may significantly reduce macular blue-light toxicity on the retina and improve protection against oxidative damage. Blue-light absorption can be considered an indirect antioxidant action because it prevents blue light from generating reactive oxygen species that can damage photoreceptor cells [84].

It is well known that carotenoids in form of monomers absorb light in range 390 nm-540 nm with maximum absorption in the region of 450 nm, whereas in form of aggregates maximum absorption may be shifted to lower wavelength. In the case of “card-pack” arrangement (H-aggregates) the shift to the shorter wavelength is observed (blue shift). In the case of “head-to-tail” organization (J-aggregates) the shift to the longer wavelength is observed (red shift). In lipid bilayers macular xanthophylls can be present as monomers or can form H-aggregates with blue-shifted absorption spectrum (Figure 4). Junghans et al. [85] has investigated the blue-light filter efficiency of four plasma carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, ß-carotene, and lycopene) incorporated into membranes of liposomes loaded with the hydrophilic fluorescent dye, Lucifer yellow, excitable by blue light. Fluorescent emission of the dye was lower in liposomes with carotenoids as compared to the control, indicating filter effect. Macular xanthophylls zeaxanthin and lutein exhibited the highest blue-light absorption activity as compared with liposomes containing non-polar carotenoids, ß-carotene, and lycopene.

Blue-light absorption by macular xanthophylls is extremely important for young eyes, for which the lens transparency is almost 95%. During aging the lens gradually loses its transparency, become yellowish [79], and better filtrate UV and blue light. Thus, in older age the blue-light filtration performed by macular xanthophylls becomes relatively less important.

Macular xanthophylls may not only act as a blue-light filter, but also optimize visual performance. The layer of macular xanthophylls is believed to reduce chromatic aberrations, glare disability, and light scattering which enhance vision contrast [86].

Physical quenching of reactive oxygen and photosensitizers

Carotenoids have been known to be the most effective singlet oxygen quenchers and their activities are much higher than that of another retinal antioxidant pigment a-tocopherol [18,87]. They are able to quench singlet oxygen by two different mechanisms. The first mechanism, which involves energy transfer, termed physical quenching, is considered the major pathway of singlet oxygen deactivation. According to this mechanism carotenoid molecules deactivate singlet oxygen to the nonreactive triplet state. During that process carotenoid molecules become excited to the triplet state and can return to the ground state dissipating the energy excess as heat. The profit of the physical quenching is that carotenoids may act without alternation of their own chemical structure. The second mechanism is called chemical quenching. It involves a chemical reaction between carotenoid and singlet oxygen which results in pigment autooxiadation. The capacity of major plasma carotenoids to quench singlet oxygen in an organic solvent mainly depends on the number of conjugated double bonds in the chromophore, but also varies with functional groups [23]. Thus, zeaxanthin (11 conjugated double bonds) has a higher ability to quench singlet oxygen than lutein (10 conjugated double bonds) (Figure 1).

Macular xanthophylls may quench singlet oxygen directly because their triplet energy level is lower than the energy level of singlet oxygen. They are also capable of quenching excited triplet states of potent singlet oxygen photosensitizers. That property is well known as non-photochemical quenching in plants. By this mechanism the largest part of excess energy is transferred from potentially harmful chlorophyll triplets to lutein and dissipated as heat [88,89]. Similarly, photoactivation of rhodopsin (also located in the unsaturated bulk domain, see Section: Distribution between membrane domains) leads to isomerization of its chromophore, 11-cis-retinal to all-trans-retinal, which under certain conditions can act as a photosensitizer. Free all-trans retinal may absorb light and transfer energy from its excited triplet state to molecular oxygen, generating singlet oxygen [90]. Close proximity of xanthophylls, which are also located in the bulk domain, allow effective energy transfer from excited all-trans-retinal to xanthophyll and prevent singlet oxygen generation by this photosensitizer [91]. We would like to summarize this section indicating: the membrane domain structure plays a significant role in the enhancing protection of retina against oxidative damage through the co-localization of macular xanthophylls with harmful molecules (singlet oxygen) and harmful processes (formation of singlet oxygen and formation of photosensitizers).

Chemical antioxidant action

Carotenoids effectively quench singlet oxygen through physical quenching (see Section: Physical quenching of reactive oxygen and photosensitizers). However, inactivation of that harmful molecule may also occur through chemical quenching involving carotenoids autoxidation. This latter process consumes carotenoids themselves. Chemical quenching contributes less than 0.05 % to the overall singlet oxygen quenching by carotenoids [92]. The degradation of four major plasma carotenoids, induced by UV light in presence of rose Bengal, has been studied [93,94]. The higher degradation rates were found for non-polar carotenoids as compare to macular xathophylls. Also studies of the autooxidation of carotenoids incorporated in pig liver microsomes [95] give similar results, non-polar carotenoids such as ß-carotene and lycopene had degraded totally, whereas the degradation of polar carotenoids was much slower, and zeaxanthin was shown to be the most stable carotenoid. We can conclude: high chemical stability of macular xanthophylls distinguish them from other dietary carotenoids.

The conjugated double bond system is primarily responsible for high chemical reactivity of carotenoids with both singlet oxygen [23,87] and free radicals [96]. Selective localization of macular xanthophylls in domains rich in polyunsaturated phospholipids (see Section: Distribution between membrane domains), and therefore susceptible to a free radical-induced damage, is ideal for their chemical antioxidant action. Carotenoids scavenge lipid peroxyl radicals by forming radical adducts [96] which are less reactive than lipid alkyl peroxyl radicals. Thus, carotenoids are effective chain-breaking antioxidants, which delay the oxidation of bio-membranes by trapping the chain-initiating or chain-propagating peroxyl radicals.

Interesting conclusions, which fit to the goal of this review, can be made by comparison of the antioxidant properties of macular xanthophylls with antioxidant properties of other dietary carotenoids investigated in organic solvents and in lipid bilayer membranes. For example, zeaxanthin and non-polar ß-carotene show similar antioxidant properties in organic solutions. However, their antioxidant properties differ when incorporated into membranes [97]. Zeaxanthin was shown to react with free radicals slightly more effectively than ß-cryptoxanthin and much more effectively than ß-carotene [98,99]. ß-Carotene and lycopene are able to react efficiently only with radicals generated inside the membrane. Macular xanthophylls, with their hydroxyl groups exposed to an aqueous environment, can also scavenge free radicals generated in the aqueous phase [37].

Antioxidant activity of carotenoids can be related to their effects on physical properties of lipid bilayer membranes [100]. Strong ordering effect of the dipolar xanthophyll, astaxanthin, is accompanied by its strong antioxidant activity. Non-polar carotenoids like ß-carotene and lycopene, which disorder the membrane, acted as relatively poorer antioxidants than the xanthophylls. ß-Carotene, because of its low membrane solubility as a monomer and low incorporation efficiency, and, therefore, weak effects on membranes—does not protect membranes against lipid peroxidation. Although at oxygen tensions close to 1 atm it may act as a prooxidant [101]. However, these conditions are not relevant for retina and other human tissues and organs. Above examples allow us to conclude: the presence of polar hydroxyl groups at the ends of macular xanthophylls and their transmembrane orientation enhance their antioxidant properties, as compared with the antioxidant properties of other dietary carotenoids.

Oxygen concentration and diffusion

The microenvironment in which membrane-located reagents are immersed can change drastically with membrane composition and depth in the lipid bilayer [55]. Oxygen is involved in most important damaging chemical reactions within the membrane which include lipid peroxidation and the formation of reactive oxygen species and the oxidative damage is postulated to be a major cause of AMD [102]. Additionally, antioxidant action of macular xanthophylls is mainly confined to the membrane environment. All these indicate that the effect of the microenvironment on the local oxygen concentration and local oxygen diffusion coefficient should modulate damaging and protective reactions involved in AMD. Thus, knowledge of profiles of oxygen concentration and oxygen diffusion across membranes or membrane domains is extremely important.

One of the authors (WKS) was involved in the development of a spin-label oximetry method which allows measurement of the oxygen diffusion-concentration product in restricted domains such as membranes, or more accurately, at a certain depth in membranes [103,104]. This product is of fundamental interest for understanding chemical reactions involving oxygen, and separation into its component factors (the diffusion coefficient and concentration) is not necessary. These results are usually presented as profiles of the oxygen-diffusion concentration product across membranes. Membrane modifiers affect profiles of this product differently in different membrane regions and membrane domains. For example, cholesterol significantly decreases the oxygen diffusion-concentration product in the polar head group region and in the hydrocarbon region near polar head groups, and increases it in the membrane center [52,105,106] (Figure 4A). Macular xanthophylls decrease the oxygen diffusion-concentration product in saturated and unsaturated membranes [27,54]. The effect is strongest in the membrane center and negligible in the head group region. At 10 mol% macular xanthophylls decrease the diffusion-concentration product in the center of lipid bilayer membranes by 30% (Figure 4B).

The effect of carotenoids on the oxygen-diffusion concentration product can have physiological significance for organisms with a high carotenoid content in their membranes, for example, for bacteria, and in some situations, for plants, in which the local carotenoid concentration in the lipid bilayer can reach a value up to a few mol%. In animals, the highest carotenoid concentration is found in the eye retina of primates, but even here the carotenoid concentration in the lipid-bilayer portion of the membrane is much lower than 1 mol% [43]. Figure 5, however, illustrates profiles of the oxygen diffusion-concentration product in membranes in the presence of different membrane modifiers. The different effects of cholesterol and polar carotenoids on oxygen transport can result from different structures and different localization of these molecules in the membrane. The cholesterol molecule is located in one half of the bilayer, and its rigid plate-like portion extends to the depth of the 7th to 10th carbon atoms in lipid hydrocarbon chains [107]. In contrast, one carotenoid molecule influences both halves of the lipid bilayer and, with two polar groups interacting with opposite hydrophilic surfaces of the membrane; it can brace together the two halves of the bilayer like a tie-bar [108]. Therefore, the oxygen diffusion-concentration product is reduced in those regions of the bilayer to which the rigid portion of the molecule of the modifier extends (see schemes in Figure 4).

clinical-ophthalmology-lipid-bilayer

Figure 4: Schematic drawing of the location of macular xanthophylls in the lipid bilayer membrane. Monomers and Haggregate are indicated together with their absorption spectra.

clinical-ophthalmology-lipid-bilayer

Figure 5: Profiles of the oxygen diffusion-concentration product across the dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine membrane measured at 25°C in the absence (○) and presence (●) of 50 mol% cholesterol (A) and 10 mol% zeaxanthin (B). Measurements in (A) were done using saturation-recovery EPR approach with phospholipid-type spin labels. Measurements in (B) were done using line-broadening EPR approach with stearic acid spin labels (SASLs). Approximate locations of the nitroxide moieties of spin labels are indicated by arrows. The nitroxide attached to C16 may pass through the center of the bilayer and stay in the other leaflet of the membrane. Schematic drawings indicate relative positions of membrane modifiers (cholesterol and zeaxanthin) in the lipid bilayer. Figure was made based on data presented in [52] and [54].

In retina membranes macular xanthophylls are mainly located in the bulk membrane domain with the profile of the oxygen diffusion-concentration product similar to upper profile in Figure 4A. They are substantially excluded from the raft domain with the profile of the oxygen diffusion-concentration product similar to lower profile in Figure 4A. Oxygen environment is very different in both situations. Thus, macular xanthophylls are localized in the membrane domain which is extremely susceptible to lipid peroxidation not only because it is rich in polyunsaturated DHA but also because the oxygen diffusion–concentration product is two to four times greater in the bulk domain than in the raft domain [26], which makes polyunsaturated lipids located in the former domain even more susceptible to oxidative damage.

Generation of singlet oxygen straightforwardly depends on the local oxygen-diffusion-concentration product. A good example related to the xanthophyll protection of the retina membranes is the generation of singlet oxygen by the photosentitizer, all-trans-retinal (as described in Section: Physical quenching of reactive oxygen and photosensitizers). High oxygen diffusion-concentration product in the bulk domain of POS membranes should increase photoproduction of singlet oxygen during collisions of molecular oxygen with all-trans-retinal. The presence of macular xanthophylls in this, highly oxygenated domain, reduces oxidative damage. We can conclude: the membrane domain structure plays a significant role in the protection of retina membranes against oxidative damage through the co-localization of potentially harmful molecules (molecular oxygen) with protective molecules.

Concluding Remarks

The diagram in Figure 6 summarizes our conclusions indicating major macular xanthophyll-membrane interactions, which can modulate or enhance their protective antioxidant actions in retina. Macular xanthophylls are highly soluble in lipid membranes with the preferential transmembrane orientation. These ensure both, physical and chemical stability of these carotenoids in the retina. Physical stability is manifested by their very slow removal from the retina, observed after discontinuation of xanthophyll supplementation.

clinical-ophthalmology-equimolar-mixtre

Figure 6: Diagram indicating how the lipid bilayer membrane and its domain structure affect the organization of macular xanthophylls within the membrane and how this xanthophyll organization affects their protective activity in membranes of POSs.

Macular xanthophylls, when located in lipid bylayer membranes, are also degraded more slowly than other dietary carotenoids, thus are chemically more stable. We think, however, that the most significant consequence of macular xanthophyll-membrane interaction is their selective accumulation in the bulk domain of the POS membrane. Rhodopsin is also located in the bulk domain of the POS membrane. Additionally, this domain is enriched in long-chain polyunsaturated phospholipids (C18-C24), as well as in very-long-chain polyunsaturated phospholipids (> C24) with 3-9 double bonds [109,110]. It has been suggested that very-long-chain polyunsaturated phospholipids likely play a unique, important role in the retina because they are necessary for cell survival and their loss leads to cell death [111,112]. It has been also suggested that they are tight-bound to rhodopsin, and that their unusually long chains may partially surround the a-helical segments of rhodopsin [113]. Co-localization of rhodopsin with polyunsaturated phospholipids creates a dangerous situation for both, especially during illumination when reactive oxygen species can be produced by photosensitizers. To protect the retina against oxidative damage, nature has used xanthophylls as an effective protector that can absorb damaging blue light, neutralize photosensitizers and reactive oxygen species, and scavenge free radicals. Co-localization of protective and protected molecules should significantly enhance the effectiveness of protectors, especially when the local concentration of xanthophylls in the membrane is not very high.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants EY015526, EB002052, and EB001980 of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. Britton G, Liaaen-Jensen S, Pfander H (2004) Carotenoids: Handbook. Springer, Basel, Switzerland.
  2. Khachik F, Beecher GR, Goli MB, Lusby WR (1991) Separation, identification, and quantification of carotenoids in fruits, vegetables and human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. Pure Appl Chem 63: 71-80.
  3. Khachik F, Spangler CJ, Smith JC Jr, Canfield LM, Steck A, et al. (1997) Identification, quantification, and relative concentrations of carotenoids and their metabolites in human milk and serum. Anal Chem 69: 1873-1881.
  4. Bone RA, Landrum JT, Hime GW, Cains A, Zamor J (1993) Stereochemistry of the human macular carotenoids. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34: 2033-2040.
  5. Bone RA, Landrum JT, Friedes LM, Gomez CM, Kilburn MD, et al. (1997) Distribution of lutein and zeaxanthin stereoisomers in the human retina. Exp Eye Res 64: 211-218.
  6. Landrum JT, Bone RA, Moore LL, Gomez CM (1999) Analysis of zeaxanthin distribution within individual human retinas. Methods Enzymol 299: 457-467.
  7. Snodderly DM, Auran JD, Delori FC (1984) The macular pigment. II. Spatial distribution in primate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25: 674-685.
  8. Rapp LM, Maple SS, Choi JH (2000) Lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in rod outer segment membranes from perifoveal and peripheral human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 1200-1209.
  9. Sommerburg OG, Siems WG, Hurst JS, Lewis JW, Kliger DS, et al. (1999) Lutein and zeaxanthin are associated with photoreceptors in the human retina. Curr Eye Res 19: 491-495.
  10. Gass JD (1999) Müller cell cone, an overlooked part of the anatomy of the fovea centralis: hypotheses concerning its role in the pathogenesis of macular hole and foveomacualr retinoschisis. Arch Ophthalmol 117: 821-823.
  11. Bhosale P, Bernstein PS (2007) Vertebrate and invertebrate carotenoid-binding proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys 458: 121-127.
  12. Bhosale P, Li B, Sharifzadeh M, Gellermann W, Frederick JM, et al. (2009) Purification and partial characterization of a lutein-binding protein from human retina. Biochemistry 48: 4798-4807.
  13. Richer SP, Stiles W, Graham-Hoffman K, Levin M, Ruskin D, et al. (2011) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of zeaxanthin and visual function in patients with atrophic age-related macular degeneration: the Zeaxanthin and Visual Function Study (ZVF) FDA IND #78, 973. Optometry 82: 667-680.
  14. Mares JA (2006) Potential value of antioxidant-rich foods in slowing age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 124: 1339-1340.
  15. Ma L, Yan SF, Huang YM, Lu XR, Qian F, et al. (2012) Effect of lutein and zeaxanthin on macular pigment and visual function in patients with early age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 119: 2290-2297.
  16. Krinsky NI (1989) Antioxidant functions of carotenoids. Free Radic Biol Med 7: 617-635.
  17. Krinsky NI (1998) The antioxidant and biological properties of the carotenoids. Ann N Y Acad Sci 854: 443-447.
  18. Di Mascio P, Murphy ME, Sies H (1991) Antioxidant defense systems: the role of carotenoids, tocopherols, and thiols. Am J Clin Nutr 53: 194S-200S.
  19. Böhm F, Edge R, Truscott TG (2012) Interactions of dietary carotenoids with singlet oxygen (1O2) and free radicals: potential effects for human health. Acta Biochim Pol 59: 27-30.
  20. Stahl W, Sies H (2003) Antioxidant activity of carotenoids. Mol Aspects Med 24: 345-351.
  21. Edge R, McGarvey DJ, Truscott TG (1997) The carotenoids as anti-oxidants--a review. J Photochem Photobiol B 41: 189-200.
  22. Britton G, Liaaen- Jensen S, Pfande H (1995) Carotenoids: Spectroscopy. Springer, Basel, Switzerland.
  23. Conn PF, Schalch W, Truscott TG (1991) The singlet oxygen and carotenoid interaction. J Photochem Photobiol B 11: 41-47.
  24. Subczynski WK, Wisniewska A, Widomska J (2010) Location of macular xanthophylls in the most vulnerable regions of photoreceptor outer-segment membranes. Arch Biochem Biophys 504: 61-66.
  25. Subczynski WK, Widomska J (2009) EPR spin labeling in carotenoids-membrane interactions. In: Landrum T (Ed) Carotenoids, Physical, Chemical, and Biological Functions and Properties. Taylor & Francis Group CRC Press, Florida, USA.
  26. Wisniewska A, Subczynski WK (2006) Distribution of macular xanthophylls between domains in a model of photoreceptor outer segment membranes. Free Radic Biol Med 41: 1257-1265.
  27. Wisniewska A, Widomska J, Subczynski WK (2006) Carotenoid-membrane interactions in liposomes: effect of dipolar, monopolar, and nonpolar carotenoids. Acta Biochim Pol 53: 475-484.
  28. Loane E, Nolan JM, O'Donovan O, Bhosale P, Bernstein PS, et al. (2008) Transport and retinal capture of lutein and zeaxanthin with reference to age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 53: 68-81.
  29. Parker RS (1996) Absorption, metabolism, and transport of carotenoids. FASEB J 10: 542-551.
  30. Thomson LR, Toyoda Y, Langner A, Delori FC, Garnett KM, et al. (2002) Elevated retinal zeaxanthin and prevention of light-induced photoreceptor cell death in quail. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 3538-3549.
  31. Sujak A, Gruszecki WI (2000) Organization of mixed monomolecular layers formed with the xanthophyll pigments lutein or zeaxanthin and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine at the argon-water interface. J Photochem Photobiol B 59: 42-47.
  32. Gruszecki WI (1991) Violaxanthin and zeaxanthin aggregation in lipid-water system. Stud Biophys 139: 95-101.
  33. Kolev VD, Kafalieva DN (1986) Miscibility of beta-carotene and zeaxanthin with and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine in multilamellar vesicles: A calorimetric and spectroscopic study. Photobiochem Photobiophys 11: 371-392.
  34. Sujak A, Okulski W, Gruszecki WI (2000) Organisation of xanthophyll pigments lutein and zeaxanthin in lipid membranes formed with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. Biochim Biophys Acta 1509: 255-263.
  35. Kennedy TA, Liebler DC (1992) Peroxyl radical scavenging by beta-carotene in lipid bilayers. Effect of oxygen partial pressure. J Biol Chem 267: 4658-4663.
  36. Milanowska J, Polit A, Wasylewski Z, Gruszecki WI (2003) Interaction of isomeric forms of xanthophyll pigment zeaxanthin with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine studied in monomolecular layers. J Photochem Photobiol B 72: 1-9.
  37. Britton G (1995) Structure and properties of carotenoids in relation to function. FASEB J 9: 1551-1558.
  38. Widomska J, Subczynski WK (2008) Transmembrane localization of cis-isomers of zeaxanthin in the host dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778: 10-19.
  39. Socaciu C, Jessel R, Diehl HA (2000) Competitive carotenoid and cholesterol incorporation into liposomes: effects on membrane phase transition, fluidity, polarity and anisotropy. Chem Phys Lipids 106: 79-88.
  40. Bangham AD, Hill MW, Miller NG (1974) Preparation and use of liposomes as models of biological membranes. Methods Memb Biol 1: 1
  41. Buboltz JT, Feigenson GW (1999) A novel strategy for the preparation of liposomes: rapid solvent exchange. Biochim Biophys Acta 1417: 232-245.
  42. Buboltz JT (2009) A more efficient device for preparing model-membrane liposomes by the rapid solvent exchange method. Rev Sci Instrum 80: 124301.
  43. Bone RA, Landrum JT (1984) Macular pigment in Henle fiber membranes: a model for Haidinger's brushes. Vision Res 24: 103-108.
  44. Gruszecki WI, Sielewiesiuk J (1990) Orientation of xanthophylls in phosphatidylcholine multibilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1023: 405-412.
  45. Subczynski WK, Markowska E, Gruszecki WI, Sielewiesiuk J (1992) Effects of polar carotenoids on dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine membranes: a spin-label study. Biochim Biophys Acta 1105: 97-108.
  46. Subczynski WK, Markowska E, Sielewiesiuk J (1993) Spin-label studies on phosphatidylcholine-polar carotenoid membranes: effects of alkyl-chain length and unsaturation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1150: 173-181.
  47. Gruszecki WI (1999) Carotenoids in membranes. In: Frank HA, Young AJ, Britton G, Cogdell RJ (Eds) The Photochemistry of Carotenoids. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Springer, Netherlands.
  48. Gruszecki WI, Strzałka K (2005) Carotenoids as modulators of lipid membrane physical properties. Biochim Biophys Acta 1740: 108-115.
  49. van de Ven M, Kattenberg M, van Ginkel G, Levine YK (1984) Study of the orientational ordering of carotenoids in lipid bilayers by resonance-Raman spectroscopy. Biophys J 45: 1203-1209.
  50. Subczynski WK, Wisniewska-Becker A, Widomska J (2012) Can macular xanthophylls replace cholestrol in formation of the liquid-ordered phase in lipid-bilayer membranes? Acta biochimica Polonica 59: 119-124.
  51. Yin JJ, Subczynski WK (1996) Effects of lutein and cholesterol on alkyl chain bending in lipid bilayers: a pulse electron spin resonance spin labeling study. Biophys J 71: 832-839.
  52. Subczynski WK, Wisniewska A, Hyde JS, Kusumi A (2007) Three-dimensional dynamic structure of the liquid-ordered domain in lipid membranes as examined by pulse-EPR oxygen probing. Biophys J 92: 1573-1584.
  53. Wisniewska A, Subczynski WK (1998) Effects of polar carotenoids on the shape of the hydrophobic barrier of phospholipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1368: 235-246.
  54. Subczynski WK, Markowska E, Sielewiesiuk J (1991) Effect of polar carotenoids on the oxygen diffusion-concentration product in lipid bilayers. An EPR spin label study. Biochim Biophys Acta 1068: 68-72.
  55. Subczynski WK, Widomska J, Feix JB (2009) Physical properties of lipid bilayers from EPR spin labeling and their influence on chemical reactions in a membrane environment. Free Radic Biol Med 46: 707-718.
  56. Landrum JT, Bone RA, Joa H, Kilburn MD, Moore LL, et al. (1997) A one year study of the macular pigment: the effect of 140 days of a lutein supplement. Exp Eye Res 65: 57-62.
  57. Seno K, Kishimoto M, Abe M, Higuchi Y, Mieda M, et al. (2001) Light- and guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate-sensitive localization of a G protein and its effector on detergent-resistant membrane rafts in rod photoreceptor outer segments. J Biol Chem 276: 20813-20816.
  58. Boesze-Battaglia K, Dispoto J, Kahoe MA (2002) Association of a photoreceptor-specific tetraspanin protein, ROM-1, with triton X-100-resistant membrane rafts from rod outer segment disk membranes. J Biol Chem 277: 41843-41849.
  59. Nair KS, Balasubramanian N, Slepak VZ (2002) Signal-dependent translocation of transducin, RGS9-1-Gbeta5L complex, and arrestin to detergent-resistant membrane rafts in photoreceptors. Curr Biol 12: 421-425.
  60. Martin RE, Elliott MH, Brush RS, Anderson RE (2005) Detailed characterization of the lipid composition of detergent-resistant membranes from photoreceptor rod outer segment membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 1147-1154.
  61. Janes PW, Ley SC, Magee AI (1999) Aggregation of lipid rafts accompanies signaling via the T cell antigen receptor. J Cell Biol 147: 447-461.
  62. Young RM, Zheng X, Holowka D, Baird B (2005) Reconstitution of regulated phosphorylation of FcepsilonRI by a lipid raft-excluded protein-tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 280: 1230-1235.
  63. Simons K, Toomre D (2000) Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1: 31-39.
  64. Simons K, Ikonen E (2000) How cells handle cholesterol. Science 290: 1721-1726.
  65. Ridyard MS, Robbins SM (2003) Fibroblast growth factor-2-induced signaling through lipid raft-associated fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2). J Biol Chem 278: 13803-13809.
  66. Lincoln JE, Boling M, Parikh AN, Yeh Y, Gilchrist DG, et al. (2006) Fas signaling induces raft coalescence that is blocked by cholesterol depletion in human RPE cells undergoing apoptosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 2172-2178.
  67. Beatty S, Koh H, Phil M, Henson D, Boulton M (2000) The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 45: 115-134.
  68. Stinson AM, Wiegand RD, Anderson RE (1991) Fatty acid and molecular species compositions of phospholipids and diacylglycerols from rat retinal membranes. Exp Eye Res 52: 213-218.
  69. Polozova A, Litman BJ (2000) Cholesterol dependent recruitment of di22:6-PC by a G protein-coupled receptor into lateral domains. Biophys J 79: 2632-2643.
  70. Anderson RE, Benolken RM, Dudley PA, Landis DJ, Wheeler TG (1974) Proceedings: Polyunsaturated fatty acids of photoreceptor membranes. Exp Eye Res 18: 205-213.
  71. Mitchell DC, Straume M, Litman BJ (1992) Role of sn-1-saturated, sn-2-polyunsaturated phospholipids in control of membrane receptor conformational equilibrium: Effects of cholesterol and acyl chain composition on the metarhodopsin I-metarhodopsin II equilibrium. Biochemistry 31: 662-670.
  72. Litman BJ, Mitchell DC (1996) A role for phospholipid polyunsaturation in modulating membrane protein function. Lipids 31 Suppl: S193-197.
  73. Wisniewska A, Subczynski WK (2006) Accumulation of macular xanthophylls in unsaturated membrane domains. Free Radic Biol Med 40: 1820-1826.
  74. Wisniewska-Becker A, Nawrocki G, Duda M, Subczynski WK (2012) Structural aspects of the antioxidant activity of lutein in a model of photoreceptor membranes. Acta Biochim Pol 59: 119-124.
  75. Landrum JT, Bone RA (2004) Mechanistic evidence for eye diseases and carotenoids. In: Krinsky NI, Mayne ST, Sies H (Eds) Carotenoids in Health and Disease. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, USA.
  76. Krinsky NI, Landrum JT, Bone RA (2003) Biologic mechanisms of the protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in the eye. Annu Rev Nutr 23: 171-201.
  77. Krinsky NI (2002) Possible biologic mechanisms for a protective role of xanthophylls. J Nutr 132: 540S-542S.
  78. Cullen AP (2002) Photokeratitis and other phototoxic effects on the cornea and conjunctiva. Int J Toxicol 21: 455-464.
  79. Barker FM, Brainard GC, Dayhaw-Barker P (1991) Transmission of the human lens as a function of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32: 1083.
  80. Boulton M, Rózanowska M, Rózanowski B (2001) Retinal photodamage. J Photochem Photobiol B 64: 144-161.
  81. Pautler EL, Morita M, Beezley D (1990) Hemoprotein(s) mediate blue light damage in the retinal pigment epithelium. Photochem Photobiol 51: 599-605.
  82. Gorgels TG, van Norren D (1995) Ultraviolet and green light cause different types of damage in rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36: 851-863.
  83. Grimm C, Wenzel A, Williams T, Rol P, Hafezi F, et al. (2001) Rhodopsin-mediated blue-light damage to the rat retina: effect of photoreversal of bleaching. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 497-505.
  84. Wooten R, Hammond BR (2002) Macular pigment: Influence on visual acuity and visibility. Prog Retin Eye Res 21: 225-240.
  85. Junghans A, Sies H, Stahl W (2001) Macular pigments lutein and zeaxanthin as blue light filters studied in liposomes. Arch Biochem Biophys 391: 160-164.
  86. Billy R, Hammond BR, Elliott JG (2013) Multiple influences of xanthophylls within the visual system. In: Landrum JT, Nolan JMCarotenoids and Retinal Disease. Taylor& Francis Group CRP Press, Florida, USA.
  87. Di Mascio P, Kaiser S, Sies H (1989) Lycopene as the most efficient biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch Biochem Biophys 274: 532-538.
  88. Mozzo M, Dall'Osto L, Hienerwadel R, Bassi R, Croce R (2008) Photoprotection in the antenna complexes of photosystem II: role of individual xanthophylls in chlorophyll triplet quenching. J Biol Chem 283: 6184-6192.
  89. Jahns P, Holzwarth AR (2012) The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1817: 182-193.
  90. Delmelle M (1978) An investigation of retinal as a source of singlet oxygen. Photochem Photobiol 27: 731-734.
  91. Kim SR, Nakanishi K, Itagaki Y, Sparrow JR (2006) Photooxidation of A2-PE, a photoreceptor outer segment fluorophore, and protection by lutein and zeaxanthin. Exp Eye Res 82: 828-839.
  92. Stahl W, Sies H (2002) Antioxidant effects of carotenoids. In: Packer L (Ed) Implication in photoprotection in humans: Handbook of Antioxidants. Marcel Dekker, Basel.
  93. Siems WG, Sommerburg O, van Kuijk FJ (1999) Lycopene and beta-carotene decompose more rapidly than lutein and zeaxanthin upon exposure to various pro-oxidants in vitro. Biofactors 10: 105-113.
  94. Hurst JS, Contreras JE, Siems WG, Van Kuijk FJ (2004) Oxidation of carotenoids by heat and tobacco smoke. Biofactors 20: 23-35.
  95. Socaciu C, Jessel R, Diehl HA (2000) Carotenoid incorporation into microsomes: yields, stability and membrane dynamics. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 56: 2799-2809.
  96. Burton GW, Ingold KU (1984) beta-Carotene: an unusual type of lipid antioxidant. Science 224: 569-573.
  97. Woodall AA, Britton G, Jackson MJ (1997) Carotenoids and protection of phospholipids in solution or in liposomes against oxidation by peroxyl radicals: relationship between carotenoid structure and protective ability. Biochim Biophys Acta 1336: 575-586.
  98. Woodall AA, Britton G, Jackson MJ (1995) Antioxidant activity of carotenoids in phosphatidylcholine vesicles: chemical and structural considerations. Biochem Soc Trans 23: 133S.
  99. Woodall AA, Lee SW, Weesie RJ, Jackson MJ, Britton G (1997) Oxidation of carotenoids by free radicals: relationship between structure and reactivity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1336: 33-42.
  100. McNulty HP, Byun J, Lockwood SF, Jacob RF, Mason RP (2007) Differential effects of carotenoids on lipid peroxidation due to membrane interactions: X-ray diffraction analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768: 167-174.
  101. Martin HD, Ruck C, Schmidt M, Sell S, Beutner S, et al. (1999) Chemistry of carotenoid oxidation and free radical reactions. Pure Appl Chem 71: 2253-2262.
  102. Hollyfield JG, Bonilha VL, Rayborn ME, Yang X, Shadrach KG, et al. (2008) Oxidative damage-induced inflammation initiates age-related macular degeneration. Nat Med 14: 194-198.
  103. Hyde JS, Subczynski WKS (1989) Spin-Label Oximetry. In: Berliner LJ, Reuben J (Eds) Biological Magnetic Resonance. Plenum, New York, USA.
  104. Subczynski WK, Swartz HM (2005) Oximetry in Biological and Model Samples in Biological Magnetic Resonance. In: Eaton SS, Eaton GR, Berliner L (Eds) Biomedical EPR–Part A: Free Radicals, Metals, Medicine, and Physiology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, USA.
  105. Subczynski WK, Hyde JS, Kusumi A (1989) Oxygen permeability of phosphatidylcholine--cholesterol membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 4474-4478.
  106. Subczynski WK, Hyde JS, Kusumi A (1991) Effect of alkyl chain unsaturation and cholesterol intercalation on oxygen transport in membranes: a pulse ESR spin labeling study. Biochemistry 30: 8578-8590.
  107. McIntosh TJ (1978) The effect of cholesterol on the structure of phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 513: 43-58.
  108. Rohmer M, Bouvier P, Ourisson G (1979) Molecular evolution of biomembranes: structural equivalents and phylogenetic precursors of sterols. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76: 847-851.
  109. Liu A, Chang J, Lin Y, Shen Z, Bernstein PS (2010) Long-chain and very long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in ocular aging and age-related macular degeneration. J Lipid Res 51: 3217-3229.
  110. Rezanka T (1989) Very-long-chain fatty acids from the animal and plant kingdoms. Prog Lipid Res 28: 147-187.
  111. Agbaga MP, Brush RS, Mandal MN, Henry K, Elliott MH, et al. (2008) Role of Stargardt-3 macular dystrophy protein (ELOVL4) in the biosynthesis of very long chain fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 12843-12848.
  112. Agbaga MP, Mandal MN, Anderson RE (2010) Retinal very long-chain PUFAs: new insights from studies on ELOVL4 protein. J Lipid Res 51: 1624-1642.
  113. Aveldaño MI (1988) Phospholipid species containing long and very long polyenoic fatty acids remain with rhodopsin after hexane extraction of photoreceptor membranes. Biochemistry 27: 1229-1239.
Citation: Widomska J, Subczynski W (2014) Why has Nature Chosen Lutein and Zeaxanthin to Protect the Retina?. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 5:326.

Copyright: © 2014 Widomska J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top