GET THE APP

The Quest for More Tolerant Rice: How High Concentrations of Iron
Transcriptomics: Open Access

Transcriptomics: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-8936

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2015) Volume 3, Issue 2

The Quest for More Tolerant Rice: How High Concentrations of Iron Affect Alternative Splicing?

Artur Teixeira De Araujo Junior1, Daniel Da Rosa Farias1, Railson Schreinert Dos Santos1, Marcelo Nogueira Do Amaral1, Luis Willian Pacheco Arge1, Danyela De Cássia Oliveira1, Solange Ferreira Da Silveira Silveira1, Rogério Oliveira De Sousa2, Eugenia Jacira Bolacel Braga3, Luciano Carlos Da Maia1 and Antonio Costa De Oliveira1*
1Plant Genomics and Breeding Center, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Brazil, E-mail: Junior@gmail.com
2Department of Soils, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Brazil, E-mail: Junior@gmail.com
3Department of Botany, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Brazil, E-mail: Junior@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author: Antonio Costa De Oliveira, Plant Genomics and Breeding Center, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, 96010-900, Capão Do Leão, Brazil, Tel: 0555332757263, Fax: 0555332759031 Email:

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a global staple food crop and an important model organism for plant studies. Recent reports have shown that alternative splicing is affected by many stressful conditions, suggesting its importance for the adaptation to adverse environments. Due to the little information on this subject, this study aimed to explore changes in splicing patterns that occur in response to high iron concentration in nutrient solutions. Here we quantified different kind of junctions and splicing events in the transcriptome of a relatively tolerant rice cultivar BRS Querência, under iron excess with concentration of 300 mg L-1 Fe+2. Plants kept under standard conditions (control) presented 127,781 different splicing junctions, while stressed plants had 123,682 different junctions. Canonical (98.85% and 98.91%), semi-canonical (0.73% and 0.70%) and non-canonical (0.42% and 0.40%) junctions were found in control and stressed plants, respectively. Intron retention was the most frequent event (44.1% and 47.4%), followed by 3’ splice site (22.6% and 21.9%), exon skipping (18.9% and 17.3%) and alternative 5’ splice site (14.4% and 13.4%) in control and stressed plants, respectively. We also found 25 differentially expressed genes (five up and 20 down regulated) that are related to post-translational modifications. These results represent an important step in the understanding of how plant stress responses occur in an iron tolerant genotype, uncovering novel genes involved in iron stress response.

<

Keywords: Transcriptomics; Iron toxicity; Abiotic stress

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the second most widely grown cereal and one of the most important food sources for human nutrition. Most of rice production is concentrated in Asia. However, Brazil is the major producer outside this continent [1,2]. It is also important to notice that, apart from its social and economic importance, rice has been widely used as a model organism to investigate many aspects in plant biology. Thus, much of the knowledge acquired from this species can also be applied to other monocots. Several minerals are essential for plant growth and most of these are usually uptaken by roots, directly from the soil solution. Among these minerals, iron (Fe, from the Latin word "ferrum"), is a vital element for plant and animal life [3,4]. However, iron can be harmful when present at high concentrations [5], reason why its content is subjected to a precise control by the cells [6,7]. Iron excess is one of the most important constraints to rice production on soils irrigated by flooding. The low oxygen environment favors the reduction of this mineral, resulting in ferrous iron (Fe+2) [5], a quite soluble form present in higher concentrations in the soil solution. This excessive iron can be easily absorbed and transported along the xylem, carried by the transpiration stream, leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in leaves, where the first symptoms are observed. Different physiological disorders caused by this toxicity culminate with big losses in crop production [8,9]. To survive unfavorable conditions, plants actively employ pre-mRNA splicing as a mechanism to regulate expression of stress-responsive genes, reprogramming intracellular regulatory networks [10]. RNA splicing is a biological process responsible for removing introns from pre-mRNA, and joining exons. Splicing can lead to the generation of multiple protein isoforms from a single gene due to alternate use of 5’ and/or 3’ splice sites by the spliceosome, a phenomenon called alternative splicing (AS) [11,12]. In this sense, splicing sites, the nucleotide sequences surrounding exon-intron boundaries that determine the action of the spliceosome have an important role [13]. AS is an important post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism that modulates gene expression and, eventually, protein forms and functions [8,9]. This process consists in a posttranscriptional modification responsible for increasing the diversity of proteins generating two or more mRNA variants of a single gene causing the inclusion or exclusion of peptide sequences, and modulation of gene expression by producing mRNA variants [14]. Plant AS events have not been characterized in many different conditions, but there is strong evidence indicating that these can promote fast changes that can contribute to species-specific differences and adaptation, performing important roles in many events, including stress response [15-18]. Recent studies suggest that environmental stresses can induce AS or alter its efficiency and fidelity in a number of genes playing a role in plant stress response and tolerance [19-22]. The progress achieved in rice transcriptome analysis has enabled researchers to understand expression patterns and their relationship to function and regulation, as well as the relationship between global transcription and chromosome features [23]. Recent studies pointed out the extensive diffusion of these phenomena in plants and its importance in gene expression and stress response [24]. RNAseq technique has been used to achieve different objectives, including gene prediction [25,26], isoform identification and quantification [19,27-30], as well as discovery of non-coding transcripts [31-33]. Therefore, understanding transcriptome dynamics is essential for unveiling functional elements of the genome and interpreting phenotypic variation produced by combinations of genotypic and environmental factors [28]. Due to the little information available on this subject, in this study, we explore changes in splicing patterns that occur in response to iron excess, aiming to evaluate and quantify different kinds of junctions and alternative splicing events in the transcriptome of an iron-tolerant rice indica cultivar (BRS Querência) under high concentrations of iron.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

Seeds of rice (cv. BRS Querência) were germinated in a growth chamber for 7 days with a photoperiod of 16 hours and a temperature of 25 ± 2°C. After this period, seedlings were transferred to plastic trays (3 L) containing pre-washed sand, and kept in a greenhouse where irrigation, with water and nutrient solution [34], was maintained. Plants were subjected to iron treatment at the seedling stage [35], adding 300 mg L-1 Fe+2 to the nutrient solution [36], while untreated plants remained in normal nutrient solution (control). Plant material was collected 24 hours after iron treatment, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for later RNA extraction.

Preparation of cDNA and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of leaves, using Purelink® Plant RNA Reagent. A TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation v2 (Illumina®) kit was used for the preparation of libraries, following manufacturer's recommendations. RNA-Seq analysis was performed using Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina®) with paired-end 2 × 100 reads.

Data analysis

In order to evaluate read quality, the software FastQC Ver. 0.11.2 [37] was used. The Trimmomatic Ver. 0.32 [38] software was used to remove the adapters and low quality base reads of each library. Then, reads were mapped against the reference genome of Oryza sativa cv. Nipponbare (IRGSP build 1.0) from The Rice Annotation Project Database (RAP-DB) [39], using the software TopHat Ver. 2.0.11 [40] with the argument “--report-secondary-alignments” to output additional or secondary alignments. TopHat uses software Bowtie Ver. 0.12.7 [41] to map the reads. To discover splice junction we mapped reads in the reference with the MapSplice program [42] using default parameters. This software detected novel canonical, semi-canonical and non-canonical splice junctions. After, a Python package Splice Grapher [43,44] was used to predict alternative splicing patterns by loci. For this analysis, first we reduced gene models and filtered alignments to reduce false-positive (with sam_filter.py), after we predicted splice graphs for all transcripts (with predict_graphs.py). Finally we compared the predicted with complete gene models to see how closely the predicted graphs match the complete gene models (with gene_model_to_ splicegraph.py). Finishing the analysis, MapMan Ver. 3.5.1.R2 [45] and the Predicted Rice Interactome Network - PRIN [46] were used to detect changes in metabolism, and in protein-protein interactions respectively. The identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was performed using edge R Ver. 3.8.5 [46-48]. The expression levels were normalized by reads per kilobase per million reads (RPKM) method, with p-value < 0.01.

Results and Discussion

A total of 127,781 and 123,682 junctions were found in plants under normal and stressful conditions, respectively. When these junctions were distributed into the three main described categories (Figure 1), significant differences in junction site ratios were found. As expected, the majority of junctions belong to canonical (98.85% and 98.91%), followed by semi-canonical (0.73% and 0.70%) and non-canonical (0.42% and 0.40%) sites in control and stressed plants, respectively. The lower number of junction sites found in iron stressed rice could be explained by the high tolerant genotype used in this study. The AS is predominant in some gene families, while absent in others [49]. A larger number of genes expressed in plants under stressful conditions may belong to families that did not present AS. The analysis of 5’ and 3’ splice sites in all introns of Arabidopsis and rice indicates that these are very similar to human, with just some subtle differences in the frequencies of specific nucleotides at specific positions. In Arabidopsis, non-canonical splicing sites occur in only 0.7% of all splicing sites [13]. Other reports demonstrated that 97.5% of splicing sites are canonical GT-AG pairs, while 1% is GC-AG and 1.5% a combination of less frequent non-canonical sites [24]. Non-canonical AS comprised “variations affecting multiple exons”, which refer to deletions of large coding sequences spanning several exons, intraexonic deletions and generation of chimeric mRNAs. These join together portions of two separate mRNA molecules leading to frame shifting, which is caused by an intron excision, therefore a lower number of non-canonical sites junctions can be a defense strategy against the stress in this cultivar [10]. The four major kinds of alternative splicing (intron retention, exon skipping, alternative 5’ splicing site, and alternative 3’ splicing site), that cover the vast majority of the alternative splicing events [50], were investigated in control and Fe overload plants. A deeper alternative splicing analysis showed that the control plants presented a higher number of events (23,307) when compared to the treated ones (8,244). The AS events were organ-specific, indicating a strong association of AS events with organ- specific regulation and a major role for AS in the functional complexity of plants [28], being this one of the possible reasons that for having a low number of events in the treated samples. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that intron retention was the most frequent event in both situations, with 10,281 (44.1%) for control and 3,909 (47.4%) for stressed (Figure 2). Similar results were also detected in others studies, demonstrating that intron retention is the most frequent type of AS in plants [34,36,51]. The second major event is alternative 3’ splice site (5,261/22.6% and 1,802/21.9%), followed by exon skipping (4,413/18.9% and 1,429/17.3%) and alternative 5’ splice site (3,352/14.4% and 1,104/13.4%). The increase in intron retention percentage may be a reflection of the underlying mechanism to create novel function acting on many other genes in plants. The stress condition can affect the plant mechanisms, even with low effect, regulating splicing by multiple mechanisms, including alteration of the population or distribution of splicing factors, or induction of changes in phosphorylation status or expression of serine-arginine-rich protein [49]. The intron retention is the AS events observed with a presence of ~40% in Arabidopsis and rice, while only 9% is observed in human [52]. The most abundant splicing event in human is exon-skipping (42%). In plants, this event is considered relatively rare, as observed in experimental data in our study. This suggests that the splice regulatory components can influence the splicing mechanisms making difference between plant and animals. The obtained data fits the reported hypothesis [53] that organisms having typically small introns use an intron-definition splicing mechanism, performing most of AS events as intron retention, and that organisms that have large introns use an exon definition mechanism (exon skipping). Similar results were already found in which intron retention represents 47% of all splicing events in rice [28] and 77% in grape [24]. The results obtained are consistent with other studies [19,27,28,51] supporting the idea that intron retention is a common event in plants. Intron retention events and alternative 5’ and 3’ splice sites can produce more mRNAs with premature termination codons (PTCs). The presence of PTCs may result in mRNA degradation via the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and translation of truncated proteins [22,54,55]. Truncated proteins can have important roles in plant stress adaptation, once that truncated proteins derived from the PTC containing mRNAs are not necessarily functionless when compared to the full-length protein [37,56,57]. AS also affects a range of regulatory genes that are presumed to have important roles in abiotic stress adaptation [10]. Its influence is present in almost all aspects of protein functions, making it a central part of gene expression regulation. Recent studies suggest that epigenetic regulation not only determines which parts of the genome are expressed, but also how they are spliced. ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) at an increased rate during stress, participating in signal transduction, modify cellular components and cause damage, being important groups of genes to analyse [58]. In this case, changes promoted by AS on the expression of proteins related to post-translational modifications were analysed. These proteins are responsible for diversifying the functions of other proteins and for the dynamic coordination of signaling networks [40]. A total of 25 differentially expressed genes were found associated to posttranslational modifications (Table 1). Of these, the first five genes (Os01g0631700, Os04g0660500, Os02g0777800, Os07g0693000, Os03g0125600) were upregulated, while the remaining 20 were downregulated. When these proteins were analysed, kinases and phosphatases were found to be the most common classes, where 14 assignments were found. These proteins are responsible for two important biological processes: phosphorylation with 14.29% of the assignments (with a total of three down-regulated genes) and dephosphorylation with 85.71% of the assignments (where 14 genes were down-regulated and four were upregulated). The most common molecular functions were transferase activity and ATP binding. In both cases, 16 downregulated and four upregulated assignments were observed. A change of scenario in genes responsible for posttranslational modifications can be seen when plants are subjected to stress. This change is perceived by decreasing the expression of most of these genes and by the activation of some other post-translational genes. These changes can be a distinct response of plants to stress. The activated post-translational modification genes are distributed into two main groups: protein kinases (Os01g0631700, Os04g0660500 and Os03g0125600) and receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (Os02g0777800 and Os07g0693000). Protein kinases play key roles in most cellular activities, performing the phosphorylation in protein side chains, a process that usually results in a functional change of the target protein by changing enzyme activity, cellular location, or association with other proteins [59,60]. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs) have important roles in plant development and stress responses, where differential expression patterns suggest their involvement in diverse functions in rice [61]. These reports aid the understanding and confirmation of results obtained. Plants respond to adverse conditions through a series of signaling processes that often involves diverse protein kinases. We found calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), stress-activated protein kinase and receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases were downregulated. Differential expression of these genes had already been detected for stresses such as drought, salinity, cold, polyethylene glycol, or abscisic acid treatment [62-65]. Just one locus (LOC_ Os02g34600) showed interactions with other differentially expressed genes. Correlations with other six loci (Figure 3), five negative (coexpression values between -0.1879 and -0.0210), and one positive correlation (0.1756) were found. Metabolomic correlation networks, indicated negative co-expression between folding and post-translational modification proteins (Figure 3). Post-translational modifications had positive co-expression with proteins of RNA processing and also had negative co-expression with ribosomal protein synthesis and with some proteins with unknown metabolism (non-assigned).

transcriptomics-Alternative-splicing-analysis

Figure 1: Alternative splicing analysis in seedling stage rice leaves (Oryza sativa ssp. indica cv. BRS Querência) after 24 hours of iron excess exposure. (A) Types of alternative splicing junctions sites. (B) Pie chart showing the percentage distribution of alternative splicing events in control and stress condition (300 mg L-1 Fe+2).

transcriptomics-posttranslational-modifications

Figure 2: Gene ontology of differentially expressed genes related to posttranslational modifications in rice (Oryza sativa ssp. indica cv. BRS Querência) under iron excess (300 mg L-1 Fe+2).

transcriptomics-post-translational

Figure 3: Interactions between genes involved in post-translational modifications in rice leaves at seedling stage (Oryza sativa ssp. indica cv. BRS Querência) after 24 hours of exposure to high concentrations of iron (300 mg L-1 Fe+2). (A) Protein-protein interaction networks. Gray lines represent co-expression less or equal to 0.5 and red lines represent co-expression above 0.8. The circle of colors representing their possible subcellular localization: navy blue to mitochondria, dark blue for the nucleus, pink for cytoplasm and gray for unknown localization. (B) Co-expression metabolomics network.

Gene-ID Locus Description
Os01g0631700 LOC_Os01g44110 Similar to SerThr specific protein kinase-like protein
Os04g0660500 LOC_Os04g56530 Armadillo-type fold domain containing protein
Os02g0777800 LOC_Os02g53750 Protein kinase, catalytic domain domain containing protein
Os07g0693000 LOC_Os07g49240 Similar to Ser-thr protein kinase
Os03g0125600 LOC_Os03g03410 SerThr specific protein kinase-like protein
Os04g0487200 LOC_Os04g41030 Serine/threonine protein kinase domain containing protein
Os07g0150700 LOC_Os07g05620 Serine/threonine protein kinase
Os12g0203000 LOC_Os12g10190 Similar to Cyclin-dependent protein kinase-like protein
Os11g0207200 LOC_Os11g10100 Similar to MAP3Ka
Os05g0318700 LOC_Os05g25450 Similar to Resistance protein candidate
Os04g0691100 LOC_Os04g59450 Serine/threonine-protein kinase SAPK5
Os04g0490500 LOC_Os04g41310 Protein kinase-like domain domain containing protein
Os02g0551100 LOC_Os02g34600 Serine/threonine-protein kinase SAPK6
Os07g0283125 LOC_Os07g18240 Similar to lectin-like receptor kinase 7
Os01g0155500 LOC_Os01g06280 Protein kinase, catalytic domain domain containing protein
Os02g0787300 LOC_Os02g54600 Similar to MAP kinase kinase
Os01g0759400 LOC_Os01g55450 CBL-interacting protein kinase 12
Os01g0960400 LOC_Os01g72990 Protein kinase, core domain containing protein
Os03g0634400 LOC_Os03g43440 Serine/threonine protein kinase domain containing protein
Os01g0583100 LOC_Os01g40094 Similar to Protein phosphatase 2C
Os01g0818700 LOC_Os01g60280 Leucine-rich repeat, N-terminal domain containing protein
Os03g0772600 LOC_Os03g56160 Similar to Lectin-like receptor kinase 7;2
Os01g0655500 LOC_Os01g46720 Protein kinase, core domain containing protein
Os02g0799000 LOC_Os02g55560 Similar to DNA-binding protein phosphatase 2C
Os03g0339900 LOC_Os03g22050 Similar to Serine/threonine protein kinase

Table 1: Genes related to post-translational modifications which are differentially expressed in rice (Oryza sativa ssp. indica cv. BRS Querência) under iron excess (300 mg L-1 Fe+2).

Conclusion

Rice plants of cv. BRS Querência under stress with concentration 300 mg L-1 Fe+2 during 24 hours change the pattern of alternative splicing in leaves. Also, changes in the expression of post-translational modification genes occur. Changes of AS events may indicate a new tolerance strategy of plants. This work represents an important step for understanding how rice plants respond to stress and how this response can increase tolerance in this species. Further investigations are necessary in order to elucidate the influence of these up-regulated genes on plant tolerance responses under stress by iron overload. Alternative transcripts identified here constitute important targets for molecular breeding through genetic engineering and marker development.

Acknowledgements

Research supported by the following Brazilian funding agencies: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS).

Competing Interests

The authors have no potential competing interests to declare.

References

  1. Finatto T, de Oliveira AC, Chaparro C, da Maia LC, Farias DR, et al. (2015) Abiotic stress and genome dynamics: specific genes and transposable elements response to iron excess in rice.Rice (N Y) 8: 13.
  2. Black MM, Quigg AM, Hurley KM, Pepper MR (2011) Iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia in the first two years of life: strategies to prevent loss of developmental potential.Nutr Rev 69 Suppl 1: S64-70.
  3. Kobayashi T, Nishizawa NK (2012) Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants.Annu Rev Plant Biol 63: 131-152.
  4. Stein RJ, Duarte GL, Spohr MG, Lopes SIG, Fett JP (2009) Distinct physiological responses of two rice cultivars subjected to iron toxicity under field conditions. Ann ApplBiol 154: 269-277.
  5. Hindt MN, Guerinot ML (2012) Getting a sense for signals: regulation of the plant iron deficiency response.BiochimBiophysActa 1823: 1521-1530.
  6. Connolly EL, Guerinot M (2002) Iron stress in plants. Genome Biology 3: 1-4.
  7. Wan JL, Zhai HQ, Wan JM, Yasui H, Yoshimura A (2003) Mapping QTL for traits associated with resistance to ferrous iron toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using japonica chromosome segment substitution lines.Yi ChuanXueBao 30: 893-898.
  8. Thongbai P, Goodman BA (2000) Free radical generation and post anoxic injury in an iron toxic soil. J Plant Physiol 23: 1887-1990.
  9. Dubrovina AS, Kiselev KV, Zhuravlev YN (2013) The role of canonical and noncanonical pre-mRNA splicing in plant stress responses.Biomed Res Int 2013: 264314.
  10. E Z, Wang L, Zhou J (2013) Splicing and alternative splicing in rice and humans.BMB Rep 46: 439-447.
  11. Zhou J, Zheng X, Shen H (2012) Targeting RNA-splicing for SMA treatment.Mol Cells 33: 223-228.
  12. Reddy AS1 (2007) Alternative splicing of pre-messenger RNAs in plants in the genomic era.Annu Rev Plant Biol 58: 267-294.
  13. Yoshimura K, Mori T, Yokoyama K, Koike Y, Tanabe N, et al.(2011) Identification of Alternative Splicing Events Regulated by an Arabidopsis Serine/Arginine-Like Protein, atSR45a, in Response to High-Light Stress using a Tiling Array. Plant and Cell Physiology 52: 1786-1805.
  14. Irimia M, Rukov JL, Roy SW (2009) Evolution of alternative splicing regulation: changes in predicted exonic splicing regulators are not associated with changes in alternative splicing levels in primates.PLoS One 4: e5800.
  15. Barbosa-Morais NL, Irimia M, Pan Q, Xiong HY, Gueroussov S, et al. (2012) The evolutionary landscape of alternative splicing in vertebrate species.Science 338: 1587-1593.
  16. Merkin J, Russell C, Chen P, Burge CB (2012) Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues.Science 338: 1593-1599.
  17. Reddy AS, Marquez Y, Kalyna M, Barta A (2013) Complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in plants.Plant Cell 25: 3657-3683.
  18. Filichkin SA, Priest HD, Givan SA, Shen R, Bryant DW, et al. (2010) Genome-wide mapping of alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana.Genome Res 20: 45-58.
  19. Iida K, Seki M, Sakurai T, Satou M, Akiyama K, et al. (2004) Genome-wide analysis of alternative pre-mRNA splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana based on full-length cDNA sequences.Nucleic Acids Res 32: 5096-5103.
  20. Ali GS, Reddy AS (2008) Regulation of alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs by stresses.Curr Top MicrobiolImmunol 326: 257-275.
  21. Mastrangelo AM, Marone D, Laidò G, De Leonardis AM, De Vita P (2012) Alternative splicing: enhancing ability to cope with stress via transcriptome plasticity.Plant Sci 185-186: 40-9.
  22. Lu T, Lu G, Fan D, Zhu C, Li W, et al. (2010) Function annotation of the rice transcriptome at single-nucleotide resolution by RNA-seq.Genome Res 20: 1238-1249.
  23. Vitulo N, Forcato C, Carpinelli EC, Telatin A, Campagna D, et al. (2014) A deep survey of alternative splicing in grape reveals changes in the splicing machinery related to tissue, stress condition and genotype. BMC Plant Biology, 14: 99-115
  24. Li Z, Zhang Z, Yan P, Huang S, Fei Z, et al. (2011) RNA-Seq improves annotation of protein-coding genes in the cucumber genome.BMC Genomics 12: 540.
  25. Zhao C, Waalwijk C, de Wit PJ, Tang D, van der Lee T (2013) RNA-Seq analysis reveals new gene models and alternative splicing in the fungal pathogen Fusariumgraminearum.BMC Genomics 14: 21.
  26. Marquez Y, Brown JW, Simpson C, Barta A, Kalyna M (2012) Transcriptome survey reveals increased complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in Arabidopsis.Genome Res 22: 1184-1195.
  27. Zhang G, Guo G, Hu X, Zhang Y, Li Q, et al. (2010) Deep RNA sequencing at single base-pair resolution reveals high complexity of the rice transcriptome.Genome Res 20: 646-654.
  28. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq.Nat Methods 5: 621-628.
  29. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, et al. (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 28: 511-515.
  30. Cabili MN, Trapnell C, Goff L, Koziol M, Tazon-Vega B, et al. (2011) Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. Genes Dev 25: 1915-1927.
  31. Pauli A, Valen E, Lin MF, Garber M, Vastenhouw NL, et al. (2012) Systematic identification of long noncoding RNAs expressed during zebrafish embryogenesis.Genome Res 22: 577-591.
  32. Guttman M, Garber M, Levin JZ, Donaghey J, Robinson J, et al. (2010) Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nat Biotechnol 28: 503-510.
  33.  Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA (1972) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. The Philippines: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) Third Edition. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
  34. McLean J, Hardy B, Hettel G (2013) Rice Almanac, 4th edition. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines
  35. Elec V, Quimio CA, Mendoza R, Sajise AGC, Beebout SEJ, et al. (2013) Maintaining elevated Fe2+ concentration in solution culture for the development of a rapid and repeatable screening technique for iron toxicity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil. 372: 253-64.
  36. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.Bioinformatics 30: 2114-2120.
  37.  Database, R.A.P.: Rice Annotation Project Database. http: //rapdb.lab.nig.ac.jp.
  38. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq.Bioinformatics 25: 1105-1111.
  39. Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.Nat Methods 9: 357-359.
  40. Wang K, Singh D, Zeng Z, Coleman SJ, Huang Y, et al. (2010) MapSplice: Accurate mapping of RNA-seq reads for splice junction discovery. Nucleic Acids Research 38: 1-14.
  41. Rogers MF, Thomas J, Reddy AS, Ben-Hur A (2012) SpliceGrapher: detecting patterns of alternative splicing from RNA-Seq data in the context of gene models and EST data.Genome Biol 13: R4.
  42. Thimm O, Bläsing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, et al. (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes.Plant J 37: 914-939.
  43. Gu H, Zhu P, Jiao Y, Meng Y, Chen M (2011) PRIN: a predicted rice interactome network.BMC Bioinformatics 12: 161.
  44. Dean CB, Nielsen JD (2007) Generalized linear mixed models: a review and some extensions.Lifetime Data Anal 13: 497-512.
  45. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.Bioinformatics 26: 139-140.
  46. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, et al. (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics.Genome Biol 5: R80.
  47. Barbazuk WB, Fu Y, McGinnis KM (2008) Genome-wide analyses of alternative splicing in plants: opportunities and challenges.Genome Res 18: 1381-1392.
  48. Keren H, Lev-Maor G, Ast G (2010) Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function.Nat Rev Genet 11: 345-355.
  49. Wang BB, Brendel V (2006) Genomewide comparative analysis of alternative splicing in plants.ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 103: 7175-7180.
  50. Kim E, Magen A, Ast G (2007) Different levels of alternative splicing among eukaryotes.Nucleic Acids Res 35: 125-131.
  51. Nakai K, Sakamoto H (1994) Construction of a novel database containing aberrant splicing mutations of mammalian genes.Gene 141: 171-177.
  52. Kalyna M, Simpson CG, Syed NH, Lewandowska D, Marquez Y, et al. (2012) Alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay modulate expression of important regulatory genes in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Resources 40: 2454-2469.
  53. Lareau LF, Brooks AN, Soergel DA, Meng Q, Brenner SE (2007) The coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.AdvExp Med Biol 623: 190-211.
  54. Zhang XC, Gassmann W (2007) Alternative splicing and mRNA levels of the disease resistance gene RPS4 are induced during defense responses.Plant Physiol 145: 1577-1587.
  55. Matsukura S, Mizoi J, Yoshida T, Todaka D, Ito  Y, et al. (2010) Comprehensive analysis of rice DREB2-type genes that encode transcription factors involved in the expression of abiotic stress-responsive genes. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 283: 185-196.
  56. Møller IM, Jensen PE, Hansson A (2007) Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants.Annu Rev Plant Biol 58: 459-481.
  57. Hanks SK, Quinn AM, Hunter T (1988) The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains.Science 241: 42-52.
  58. Chaiwongsar S, Otegui MS, Jester PJ, Monson SS, Krysan PJ (2006) The protein kinase genes MAP3K epsilon 1 and MAP3K epsilon 2 are required for pollen viability in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J 48: 193-205.
  59. Vij S, Giri J, Dansana PK, Kapoor S, Tyagi A K (2008) The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (OsRLCK) gene family in rice: Organization, phylogenetic relationship, and expression during development and stress. Molecular Plant 1: 732-750.
  60. Kanwar P, Sanyal SK, Tokas I, Yadav AK, Pandey A, et al. (2014) Comprehensive structural, interaction and expression analysis of CBL and CIPK complement during abiotic stresses and development in rice. Cell Calcium 56: 81-95.
  61. Szponarski W, Sommerer N, Boyer JC, Rossignol M, Gibrat R (2004) Large-scale characterization of integral proteins from Arabidopsis vacuolar membrane by two-dimensional liquid chromatography. Proteomics 4: 397-406.
  62. Zhou X, Ma Y, Sugiura R, Kobayashi D, Suzuki M, et al. (2010) MAP kinase kinasekinase (MAPKKK)-dependent and -independent activation of Sty1 stress MAPK in fission yeast.J BiolChem 285: 32818-32823.
  63. Chaiwongsar S, Otegui MS, Jester PJ, Monson SS, Krysan PJ (2006) The protein kinase genes MAP3K epsilon 1 and MAP3K epsilon 2 are required for pollen viability in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J 48: 193-205.
Citation: Junior ATD, Farias DD, dos Santos RS, do Amaral MN, Arge LWP, et al. (2015) The Quest for More Tolerant Rice: How High Concentrations of Iron Affect Alternative Splicing? Transcriptomics 3:122.

Copyright: © 2015 Junior ATD et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top