Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research

Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2593-9173

Review Article - (2018) Volume 9, Issue 1

Strategies Used to Prolong the Shelf Life of Fresh Commodities

Sandarani MDJC*, Dasanayaka DCMCK and Jayasinghe CVL
Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Livestock Fisheries and Nutrition, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila, 60170, Sri Lanka
*Corresponding Author: Sandarani MDJC, Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Livestock Fisheries and Nutrition, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila, 60170, Sri Lanka, Tel: +94372 281412 Email:

Abstract

Fruits and vegetables are metabolically active, perishable fresh commodities that have a shorter shelf life. Postharvest treatments of fresh produce are used as strategies to minimize major losses in nutritional and quality attributes. Moreover, they are crucial in terms of consumer safety. Post-harvest treatments will slow down the physiological processes in fresh fruits and vegetables such as respiration, senescence and ripening. In addition, those treatments also reduce the incidence of pathogen attacks and microbial contamination to increase the shelf life of fresh commodities. Recent studies involving postharvest treatments are reviewed, with the aim to capture the state of art on current research about strategies used to reduce postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables.

<

Keywords: Fresh produce; Physiological processes; Post- harvest losses; Post-harvest treatments

Introduction

Fruits and vegetables are widely used as an excellent source of micronutrients and phytochemicals. Habitual inclusion of fruits and vegetables in the diet may prevent or reduce the risk of several chronic diseases [1,2]. However, as they are perishable products that contain living tissues, the quality retention and prevention of postharvest loss during handling, storage and retailing is critical [3]. It is estimated that more than 20-22% of the total production of fruits is lost due to spoilage at various post-harvest handling stages [4].

Postharvest treatments are used to minimize the loss of fresh produce as well as to maintain the quality, thereby increase the shelf life [5]. They can be divided in to three main categories as chemical, physical and gaseous treatments. Chemical treatments include usage of hydrogen peroxide, chlorine-based solutions, peroxyacetic acid, organic acids, nitric oxide and Sulphur dioxide to retard browning reactions, inhibit ethylene bio synthesis, reduce respiration rate and water loss and reduce the incidence of postharvest diseases [6-8]. Moreover, chemical treatments can minimize the deterioration of texture and microbial growth in fresh produce [9]. Heat treatments, edible coating and irradiation are the major physical treatments used to prevent postharvest loss of fruits and vegetables. Heat treatments are used for insect infestation, disease control and to prevent chilling injuries [10,11]. Edible coatings provide a barrier for moisture and preserve color, texture and natural aroma [12,13]. Irradiation is used to inhibit sprouting of tubers, bulbs and roots [14-16].

Gaseous treatments include ozonation, 1-methyl propene, control atmospheric packaging and modified atmospheric packaging. They are also helping to maintain cell wall integrity, peel color, retard senescence, reduction in decay, slow down the respiration rate and deterioration [17-19]. This review will focus on different types of postharvest treatments, their beneficial effects and limitations in usage. It also examines the status of postharvest treatments on fresh produce.

Chemical Treatments

Antimicrobial and anti-browning agents

Magnitude of enzymatic factors and microbial growth in fruits and vegetables may have a great impact on post-harvest quality and consumer safety [20]. Post-harvest quality can be maintained by using different anti-microbial and anti-browning agents. These agents include chlorine-based solutions, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), peroxyacetic acid (PAA), organic acids, and electrolyzed water [5].

Chlorine-based solutions are commonly used as a disinfectant due to its very strong oxidizing properties and cost effectiveness, but chlorine have been associated with the formation of carcinogenic compounds. In addition, Chlorine-based compounds have a limited effectiveness in the reduction of microbial load on fresh produce. However, high levels may cause taste and odour defects on treated products [9]. H2O2 is a compound which has bactericidal, sporicidal and inhibitory ability based on oxidation of fungi and bacteria, and it was successfully used to control vegetable pathogens during storage [21]. Treatment with H2O2 can extend the shelf life and reduce natural and pathogenic microbial populations in melons, oranges, apples, prunes, tomatoes, whole grapes and fresh-cut produce [22]. PAA has not reported any harmful byproducts and it is very effective in controlling E. coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in apples, strawberries, lettuce and cantaloupe [23].

Today, the use of reducing compounds, including ascorbic acid and its derivatives, cysteine and glutathione, is most effective for controlling enzymatic browning [24]. Organic acids have been applied largely to slow down enzymatic and non-enzymatic browning, deterioration of texture and microbial growth on fresh produce [25]. Chelating agents such as sorbic acid, polycarboxylic acids (citric, malic, tartaric, oxalic and succinic acids), polyphosphates (ATP and pyrophosphates), macromolecules (porphyrins, proteins) and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), which can inactivate enzymes by binding to transition metals in the metal-enzyme complex, have been used for a variety of food processing applications. Poly Phenol Oxidase (PPO) possesses copper at its active site and removal of the copper by chelation inevitably renders PPO inactive. A typical combination of anti-browning agents for fresh-cut products may consist of a chemical reducing agent, an acidulant and a chelating agent. However, internalization of bacteria and inaccessible sites of fruits and vegetables are the major limitations of applying anti-microbial and anti-browning agents [26].

Nitric oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) is a highly reactive and acts as a multifunctional signaling molecule in various plant physiological processes, such as fruit ripening and senescence of fruits and vegetables [27].

Postharvest application of NO is a potential new technology to reduce post-harvest losses of fruits and vegetables during handling and marketing [28]. Exogenous application of NO by gas fumigation or dipping in a solution has been demonstrated beneficial effects to reduce the production of ethylene, reduce rate of respiration and reduce ion leakage resulting from better maintenance of cellular integrity; reduction in oxidative stress through reduced lipid oxidation and enhanced activity of a range of antioxidant enzymes [29]. Successful application of NO has been reported for apple, banana, kiwifruit, mango, peach, pear, plum, strawberry, tomato, papaya, loquat, Chinese winter jujube fruit and Chinese bayberry [30]. It has found that treatments of strawberries with NO delayed the onset of senescence and extend postharvest life by inhibiting the action of ethylene [31]. NO has been combined with cold storage conditions and modified atmospheric conditions to improve the shelf life of fruits and vegetables such as Mango, green beans and broccoli [32-34].

Sulfur dioxide

SO2 treatment is widely used due to its universal antiseptic action and economic application [26]. SO2 technology has been tested for control of postharvest decay on fruits such as table grapes, litchi, fig, banana, lemon or apple. However, the SO2 concentration necessary to inhibit fungal growth may induce injuries in grape fruits and stems, and sulfite residues pose a health risk for some individuals [35].

Calcium chloride

Calcium chloride is used to reduce chilling injuries, suppress senescence, enhance the storage and marketable life of fruits by maintaining their firmness and quality. Calcium application also delays aging or ripening, reduces postharvest decay, reduce the incidence of physiological disorders and increase the resistance to diseases [36]. It has been suggested that calcium treatment can increase tissue firmness and reduced the susceptibility to physiological disorders and reduced the risk of salt-related injuries in peaches [37]. The post-harvest application of CaCl2 extend the storage life of pear up to 2 months, plum up to 4 weeks and apple up to 6 months at 0-2ºC with excellent color and quality [36].

Gaseous Treatments

Ozone

Activated oxygen is the best available technology that can replace traditional sanitizing agents [38,39]. It is strong and ideal, germicide, sanitizer, sterilizer, anti-microbial, fungicide and deodorizer and detoxifying agent [40].

Ozone oxidizes the metabolic products and neutralizes the odors generated during the ripening stage in storage of fruits. This helps preserve and almost double the shelf life on fresh produce. It also enhances the taste by retaining the original flavor of the products [42]. Ozone enhances the taste of most perishables by oxidizing pesticides and by neutralizing ammonia and ethylene gases produced by ripening or decay. The reduction of ethylene gas increases the shelf life and reduces shrinkage. It changes the chemicals complex molecular structure back to its safe and original basic elements. Its use does not leave any toxic by-products or residues, does not affect healthy cells or alter its chemistry, and is non-carcinogenic. Ozone always reverts to its original form-oxygen [43].

However, Ozone should be constantly consumed and absorbed during the oxidation process. The effectiveness of ozonation can be influenced by different factors such as presence of steam and humidity level. The micro-organisms must be in a certain condition of swelling to be attacked [44].

1-Methylcyclopropene

1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) is a synthetic cyclic olefin which can block the access to ethylene-binding receptor there by inhibit the action of ethylene [45]. It has found that avocado treated with 1-MCP showed significantly less weight loss and retained greener color than control fruit at the full-ripe stage [46]. It can also inhibit ethylene induced ripening of avocado fruit at very low concentration by suppressing the ethylene response pathway by permanently binding to a sufficient number of ethylene receptors [47]. Treatment with 1-MCP controls the blue mold rot, postharvest pitting and effectively suppressed endogenous ethylene production in citrus fruits [48,49]. Moreover, it has increased the firmness of apple and pears [50,51].

In addition, Postharvest application of 1-MCP significantly delayed and suppressed the climacteric ethylene production of plum with reduction in the activities of ethylene [52]. However, application of 1- methylcyclopropene to permit extended storage requires prior assessment of the appropriate concentration range and storage conditions for each type of produce at maturity [53].

Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP)

MAP is a technique used to extend the shelf life of commodities by sealing them in polymeric film packages to modify the oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration levels within the package atmosphere [54]. Composition of the air inside the package is changed due to the respiration and transfer of gases through the package. In contrast, it creates an atmosphere richer in carbon dioxide and lower in oxygen [55]. Reduced oxygen and elevated carbon dioxide levels effectively reduce the rate of respiration of fruits and vegetables [56]. Elevated carbon dioxide levels inhibit the production of ethylene hormone and suppress plant tissue sensitivity for the effects of ripening [57].

The use of MAP also reduces the incidence of decay, compositional changes and softening of tissues [54]. Furthermore, it can retard the browning reactions and senescence thereby extends the post-harvest life [56]. MAP is widely used in the long-term storage of apple, pears, kiwi fruits, cabbage, and temporary transport of strawberries, guava, banana and tomato [58]. However, risks of developing anaerobic pathogenic flora in MAP are unknown. Most of the plastic films are undesirable for the environment [59,60].

Physical Treatments

Heat treatments

During the past few years there is a higher demand for heat treatments in post-harvest technology instead of chemicals. However, usage is limited due to the high cost [26]. Mode of action of heat treatment is to wash off the spores from the surface of the commodity. In addition, due to heat energy there is a considerable reduction of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. There are different types of heat treatments including hot water dip, saturated water vapor heat, hot dry air and hot water rinse with brushing [61].

Heat treatments have shown beneficial effects for insect control, prevention of fungal development, delayed ripening through inactivation of enzymes and prevention of postharvest storage disorders including chilling injury [62]. Many commodities will develop chilling injury if the temperature is too low or if the cold conditions are maintained for too long. Heat treatments have been found to delay or prevent the development of chilling injury and ripening processes. Ripening can be delayed by heat inactivation of degradative enzymes [63]. Time of the heat treatment can depend upon several factors and it can be vary from hours to days [64]. Heat treatments have been used to preserve the color of asparagus, to prevent the development of off flavors, to prevent development of overripe flavors in cantaloupe and other melons, to the longevity of grapes, plums, bean sprouts and peaches and to preserve the color of asparagus, broccoli, green beans, kiwi fruits and celery [61,64].

Edible coatings

Edible coatings are thin layer of material which provides a barrier to moisture, oxygen and solute movement for the food. It can be a complete food coating or can be disposed as a continuous layer between food components [12]. Polysaccharides, lipid-based substances and protein films are commonly used as edible coatings [65]. Edible coatings provide a barrier to moisture and minimize the loss of moisture during storage. They can also act as a gas barrier and slow down the respiration, senescence and enzymatic oxidation [66,67]. In addition, edible coatings help to preserves color, texture and volatile compounds of fresh fruits and vegetables. It also maintains the structural integrity and protects against mechanical damages [13].

However, thick coating on fruits and vegetables surface becomes an undesirable barrier between the external and internal atmosphere and restricts exchange of respiratory gases (CO2 and O2). It may result in anaerobic respiration, which produces much more carbon dioxide, acetaldehyde and ethanol. The acetaldehyde and ethanol results in fermentation and give off-flavor to the product, which are detrimental to the perceived quality [68].

The edible coatings that have been used in different types of fruits and vegetables are summarized in Table 1.

Coating Material Purpose Fruit/Vegetable References
Chitosan: Methyl Cellulose   Antimicrobial, Antioxidant properties, Gas Barrier properties Strawberries
Apple, pear,
pomegranate  
[12, 68, 69]
    Mixture of sucrose fatty acid
esters, sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, and
mono and diglycerides
Retard ripening, reduce weight loss and chlorophyll loss   Mango     [70]    
Retention of firmness, green skin color, and titrable acidity Pear [69]
Chitosan, Twin 80 Reduce ethylene production and
delay ripening as indicated by high content of titrable acidity
Pear [71]
Polyvinyl alcohol, starch and
Surfactant
Reduce the rate of physiological processes and delay ripening Fruits [69]
Alovera gel Improve the keeping quality and extend the shelf life Mushroom [66]
Cellulose and glycerol Reduce the rate of physiological processes Carrot [72]
Bees wax, sunflower oil, tamarind seed powder and tween 80 Reduce the rate of Physiological process and extend shelf life Guava [73]

Table 1: Different types of edible coatings used in research studies.

Irradiation

Food irradiation is a process of exposing the produce to speed particles or rays for improving the shelf life [15,74]. It is also serve as a quarantine treatment for many fruits and vegetables [75]. However, all fruits and vegetables are not appropriate for irradiation including cucumbers, grapes, and some tomatoes as they are sensitive to radiation [76].

Irradiation can be used on alone or in combination with other methods to improve the microbiological safety and extend shelf life [77]. Dose of application on fruit products are limited by their impact on quality [78]. The maximum doses which can be applied on fruits and vegetables range between 1 and 2 kGy. However, these maximum values depend on the type of products and might modify with new, resistant cultivars [79]. Most studies indicated that, the irradiation of fresh fruits led to a reduction in firmness. Irradiation can be recommended for sprouting inhibition (in the range of 50-200 Gy) and disinfestations purposes (at doses like those used for other dry foods) in sprouting foods such as potatoes, garlic, onions and yams [75].

In contrast, people are very confused to distinguish irradiated foods from radioactive foods. Irradiation process is not possible to induce radioactivity in the food by using gamma rays or electron beams up to 10 MeV [80]. Moreover, heterocyclic ring compounds and carcinogenic aromatic produced during thermal processing of food at high temperatures were not identified in irradiated foods [74].

Future Research Needs

There are wide ranges of chemical, gaseous and physical treatments to reduce the post-harvest losses but, future research based on postharvest technology should be carried out to improve the efficacy of treatments as well as to address the safety issues. Although there are different physical, chemical and gaseous treatments are available, their effectiveness should be investigated extensively.

Emerging technologies and techniques such as using nano-materials for edible coating, using nano packaging materials with ethylene binders and cold plasma technology should be combined with other chemical and gas treatments to optimize the beneficial effects. However, more detailed studies are essential to evaluate the effect of novel treatments on fresh produce.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Cooper DA (2004) Carotenoids in health and disease: recent scientific evaluations, research recommendations and the consumer. The Journal of Nutrition 134: 221-224.
  2. Bermejo LM, Aparicio A, Andrés P, López-Sobaler AM, Ortega RM (2007) The influence of fruit and vegetable intake on the nutritional status and plasma homocysteine levels of institutionalised elderly people. Public Health Nutrition 10: 266-272.
  3. Asrey R, Sasikala C, Barman K, Koley TK (2008) Advances in post-harvest treatments of fruits-A review. Annals of Horticulture 1: 1-10.
  4. Sandhya S (2010) Modified Atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: current status and future needs. Food Science and Technology 43: 381-392.
  5. Artés F, Gómez P, Aguayo E, Escalona V, Artés-Hernández F (2009) Sustainable sanitation techniques for keeping quality and safety of fresh-cut plant commodities. Postharvest Biology and Technology 51: 287-296.
  6. Lopez-Galvez F, Ragaert P, Palermo LA, Eriksson M, Devlieghere F (2013) Effect of new sanitizing formulations on quality of fresh-cut iceberg lettuce. Postharvest Biology and Technology 85: 102-108.
  7. Kýhos K, Průchová J, Novotná P (2010) Decontamination of cut carrot by persteril® agent based on the action of peroxyacetic acid. Czech J Food Sci 28: 564-571.
  8. Singh Z, Khan AS, Zhu S, Payne AD. Nitric oxide in the regulation of fruit ripening: challenges and thrusts. Stewart Postharvest Review 9: 1-11.
  9. Baskaran SA, Upadhyay A, Kollanoor‐Johny A, Upadhyaya I, Mooyottu S, et al. (2013) Efficacy of Plant‐Derived Antimicrobials as Antimicrobial Wash Treatments for Reducing Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157: H7 on Apples. Journal of Food Science p: 78.
  10. Fallik E (2004) Prestorage hot water treatments (immersion, rinsing and brushing). Postharvest biology and technology 32: 125-134.
  11. Paull RE, Chen NJ (2000) Heat treatment and fruit ripening. Postharvest Biology and Technology 21: 21-37.
  12. Gol NB, Patel PR, Rao TR (2013) Improvement of quality and shelf-life of strawberries with edible coatings enriched with chitosan. Postharvest Biology and Technology 85: 185-195.
  13. Dhall RK (2013) Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: a review. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 53: 435-450.
  14. Farkas J (2014) Food technologies: food irradiation. Encycl Food Safety 3: 178-186.
  15. Ferrier P (2010) Irradiation as a quarantine treatment. Food Policy 35: 548-555.
  16. Mahto R, Das M (2013) Effect of gamma irradiation on the physico-chemical and visual properties of mango (Mangiferaindica L.), cv.‘Dushehri’and ‘Fazli’stored at 20 C. Postharvest biology and technology 86: 447-455.
  17. Ali A, Ong MK, Forney CF (2014) Effect of ozone pre-conditioning on quality and antioxidant capacity of papaya fruit during ambient storage. Food chemistry 142: 19-26.
  18. Suslow T (2004) Ozone applications for postharvest disinfection of edible horticultural crops. UCANR Publications.
  19. Garner D, Crisosto CH, Otieza E (2001) Controlled atmosphere storage and aminoethoxyvinylglycine postharvest dip delay post cold storage softening ofSnowking'peach. HortTechnology 11: 598-602.
  20. Lamikanra O (2002) Fresh cut Fruits & Vegetables: Science Technology & Marketing, CRC Press
  21. Afek U, Orenstein J, Nuriel E (1999) Fogging disinfectants inside storage rooms against pathogens of potatoes and sweet potatoes. Crop Protection 18: 111-114.
  22. Cengiz MF, Certel M (2014) Effects of chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, and ozone on the reduction of mancozeb residues on tomatoes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38: 371-376.
  23. Rodgers SL, Cash JN, Siddiq M, Ryser ET (2004) A comparison of different chemical sanitizers for inactivating Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in solution and on apples, lettuce, strawberries, and cantaloupe. Journal of food protection 67: 721-731.
  24. He Q, Luo Y (2007) Enzymatic browning and its control in fresh-cut produce. Stewart Postharvest Review 3: 1-7.
  25. Aguayo E, Allende A, Artés F (2003) Keeping quality and safety of minimally fresh processed melon. European Food Research and Technology 216: 494-499.
  26. Mahajan PV, Caleb OJ, Singh Z, Watkins CB, Geyer M (2014) Postharvest treatments of fresh produce. Phil Trans R Soc A 372: 20130309.
  27. Wendehenne D, Durner J, Klessig DF (2004) Nitric oxide: a new player in plant signalling and defence responses. Current opinion in plant biology 7: 449-455.
  28. Pristijono P, Wills RB, Golding JB (2008) Use of the nitric oxide-donor compound, diethylenetriamine-nitric oxide (DETANO), as an inhibitor of browning in apple slices. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 83: 555-558.
  29. Singh Z, Khan AS, Zhu S, Payne AD (2013) Nitric oxide in the regulation of fruit ripening: challenges and thrusts. Stewart Postharvest Review 9: 1-11.
  30. Manjunatha G, Gupta KJ, Lokesh V, Mur LA, Neelwarne B (2012) Nitric oxide counters ethylene effects on ripening fruits. Plant signaling  and behaviour 7: 476-483.
  31. Wills R, McGlasson B, Graham D, Joyce D, Rushing JW (1999) Postharvest: An introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. Journal of vegetable crop production 4: 83-84.
  32. Zaharah SS, Singh Z (2011) Mode of action of nitric oxide in inhibiting ethylene biosynthesis and fruit softening during ripening and cool storage of ‘Kensington Pride’mango. Postharvest Biology and Technology 62: 258-266.
  33. Singh SP, Singh Z, Swinny EE (2009) Postharvest nitric oxide fumigation delays fruit ripening and alleviates chilling injury during cold storage of Japanese plums (Prunus salicina Lindell). Postharvest Biology and Technology 53: 101-108.
  34. Soegiarto L, Wills RB (2004) Short term fumigation with nitric oxide gas in air to extend the postharvest life of broccoli, green bean, and bok choy. HortTechnology 14: 538-540.
  35. Palou L, Serrano M, Martínez-Romero D, Valero D (2010) New approaches for postharvest quality retention of table grapes. Fresh Produce 4: 103-110.
  36. El-Ramady HR, Domokos-Szabolcsy É, Abdalla NA, Taha HS, Fári M (2015) Postharvest management of fruits and vegetables storage. InSustainable agriculture reviews, Springer, Cham pp: 65-152.
  37. Manganaris GA, Vasilakakis M, Diamantidis G, Mignani I (2007) The effect of postharvest calcium application on tissue calcium concentration, quality attributes, incidence of flesh browning and cell wall physicochemical aspects of peach fruits. Food Chemistry 100: 1385-1392.
  38. Huyskens-Keil S, Hassenberg K, Herppich WB (2012) Impact of postharvest UV-C and ozone treatment on textural properties of white asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 84: 229.
  39. Hassenberg K, Huyskens-Keil S, Herppich WB (2013) Impact of postharvest UV-C and ozone treatments on microbiological properties of white asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 85: 174.
  40. Graham DM (2000) Ozone as an anti-microbial agent for the treatment, storage and processing of foods in gas and aqueous phases, Direct food additive petition, Electric Power Research Insititue, Palo, Alto,California.
  41. Pérez AG, Sanz C, Ríos JJ, Olias R, Olías JM (1999) Effects of ozone treatment on postharvest strawberry quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47: 1652-1656.
  42. Kim JG, Yousef AE (2000) Inactivation kinetics of foodborne spoilage and pathogenic bacteria by ozone. Journal of Food Science 65: 521-528.
  43. Kim JG, Yousef AE, Dave S (1999) Application of ozone for enhancing the microbiological safety and quality of foods: a review. Journal of food protection 62: 1071-1087.
  44. Castillo A, McKenzie KS, Lucia LM, Acuff GR (2003) Ozone treatment for reduction of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella Serotype Typhimurium on beef carcass surfaces. Journal of food protection 66: 775-779.
  45. Sisler EC, Serek M (1997) Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level: recent developments. Physiologia plantarum 100: 577-582.
  46. Jeong J, Huber DJ, Sargent SA (2002) Influence of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on ripening and cell-wall matrix polysaccharides of avocado (Perseaamericana) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 25: 241-256.
  47. Manganaris GA, Crisosto CH, Bremer V, Holcroft D (2008) Novel 1-methylcyclopropene immersion formulation extends shelf life of advanced maturity ‘Joanna Red’plums (Prunus salicina Lindell). Postharvest Biology and Technology 47: 429-433.
  48. Dou H, Jones S, Ritenour M (2005) Influence of 1-MCP application and concentration on post-harvest peel disorders and incidence of decay in citrus fruit. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 80: 786-792.
  49. Win TO, Srilaong V, Heyes J, Kyu KL, Kanlayanarat S (2006) Effects of different concentrations of 1-MCP on the yellowing of West Indian lime (Citrus aurantifolia, Swingle) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 42: 23-30.
  50. DeEll JR, Murr DP, Mueller R, Wiley L, Porteous MD (2005) Influence of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), diphenylamine (DPA), and CO2 concentration during storage on ‘Empire’apple quality. Postharvest Biology and Technology 38: 1-8.
  51. Trinchero GD, Sozzi GO, Covatta F, Fraschina AA (2004) Inhibition of ethylene action by 1-methylcyclopropene extends postharvest life of “Bartlett” pears. Postharvest Biology and Technology 32: 193-204.
  52. Khan AS, Singh Z, Abbasi NA (2007) Pre-storage putrescine application suppresses ethylene biosynthesis and retards fruit softening during low temperature storage in ‘Angelino’plum. Postharvest Biology and Technology 46: 36-46.
  53. Cubells-Martinez X, Alonso JM, Sanchez-Ballesta MT, Granell A (1999) Ethylene Perception and Response in Citrus Fruit. In Biology and Biotechnology of the Plant Hormone Ethylene II, Springer, Dordrecht, pp: 137-143.
  54. Mangaraj S, Goswami TK (2009) Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables for extending shelf-life-A review. Fresh produce 3: 1-31.
  55. Fonseca SC, Oliveira FA, Brecht JK (2002) Modelling respiration rate of fresh fruits and vegetables for modified atmosphere packages: a review. Journal of food engineering 52: 99-119.
  56. Rennie TJ, Vigneault C, Raghavan GS, DeEll JR (2001) Effects of pressure reduction rate on vacuum cooled lettuce quality during storage. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 43: 3-9.
  57. Kubo Y, Inaba A, Nakamura R (1989) Effects of high CO2 on respiration in various horticultural crops. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 58: 731-736.
  58. Mahajan PV, Oliveira FA, Montanez JC, Frias J (2007) Development of user-friendly software for design of modified atmosphere packaging for fresh and fresh-cut produce. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 8: 84-92.
  59. Irtwange SV (2006) Application of modified atmosphere packaging and related technology in postharvest handling of fresh fruits and vegetables. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal.
  60. Sivakumar D, Korsten L (2006) Influence of modified atmosphere packaging and postharvest treatments on quality retention of litchi cv. Mauritius. Postharvest Biology and Technology 41: 135-142.
  61. Schirra M, D'hallewin G, Ben-Yehoshua S, Fallik E (2000) Host–pathogen interactions modulated by heat treatment. Postharvest Biology and Technology 21: 71-85.
  62. Lurie S, Pedreschi R (2014) Fundamental aspects of postharvest heat treatments. Horticulture research 1: 14030.
  63. Lurie S (1998) Postharvest heat treatments. Postharvest Biology and Technology 14: 257-269.
  64. Fallik E (2004) Prestorage hot water treatments (immersion, rinsing and brushing). Postharvest biology and technology 32: 125-134.
  65. Bourtoom T (2008) Edible films and coatings: characteristics and properties. International Food Research Journal 15: 237-248.
  66. Mohebbi M, Ansarifar E, Hasanpour N, Amiryousefi MR (2012) Suitability of Aloe vera and gum tragacanth as edible coatings for extending the shelf life of button mushroom. Food and Bioprocess Technology 5: 3193-3202.
  67. Ghasemnezhad M, Zareh S, Rassa M, Sajedi RH (2013) Effect of chitosan coating on maintenance of aril quality, microbial population and PPO activity of pomegranate (Punicagranatum L. cv. Tarom) at cold storage temperature. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93: 368-374.
  68. Srinivasa P, Baskaran R, Ramesh M, Prashanth KH, Tharanathan R (2002) Storage studies of mango packed using biodegradable chitosan film. European Food Research and Technology 215: 504-508.
  69. Farber JN, Harris LJ, Parish ME, Beuchat LR, Suslow TV, Gorney JR, et al. (2003) Microbiological safety of controlled and modified atmosphere packaging of fresh and fresh‐cut produce. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety 2: 142-160.
  70. Motlagh FH, Quantick PC (1988) Effect of permeable coatings on the storage life of fruits. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 23: 99-105.
  71. Li H, Yu T (2001) Effect of chitosan on incidence of brown rot, quality and physiological attributes of postharvest peach fruit. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81: 269-274.
  72. Li P, Barth MM (1998) Impact of edible coatings on nutritional and physiological changes in lightly-processed carrots. Postharvest Biology and technology 14: 51-60.
  73. Wickramarathna PS, Rathnayake RMNP, Jayasinghe CVL (2017) Postharvest shelflife extension of coated giant guava using an appropriate dosage of Gamma radiation, Congress Proceedings of Undergraduate Research Symposium, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka p: 76.
  74. Marcotte M (2001) Effect of irradiation on spices, herbs and seasonings-comparison with ethylene oxide fumigation.
  75. Mostafavi HA, Mirmajlessi SM, Fathollahi H (2012) The Potential of Food Irradiation: Benefits and Limitations, Trends in vital food & control engineering pp: 43-60.
  76. Bandekar JR, Dhokane VS, Shashidhar R, Hajare S, Saroj S, Sharma A (2006) Use of irradiation to ensure hygienic quality of fresh, pre-cut fruits and vegetables and other minimally processed foods of plant origin. Use of Irradiation to Ensure the Hygienic Quality of Fresh, Pre-Cut Fruits and Vegetables and Other Minimally Processed Food of Plant Origin p: 170.
  77. Arvanitoyannis IS, Stratakos AC, Tsarouhas P (2009) Irradiation applications in vegetables and fruits: a review. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 49: 427-462.
  78. Zhu MJ, Mendonca A, Ismail HA, Ahn DU (2009) Fate of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat turkey breast rolls formulated with antimicrobials following electron-beam irradiation. Poultry science 88: 205-213.
  79. Farkas J (2004) Charged particle and photon interactions with matter. In: Mozumder A, Hatano Y (eds): Food Irradiation. Marcel Dekker, New York: 785–812.
Citation: Sandarani MDJC, Dasanayaka DCMCK, Jayasinghe CVL (2018) Strategies Used to Prolong the Shelf Life of Fresh Commodities. J Agri Sci Food Res 9: 206.

Copyright: © 2018 Sandarani MDJC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top