Signal Transduction Mechanisms in T lymphocytes– Introd
Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology

Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9899

+44 1223 790975

Editorial - (2013) Volume 4, Issue 2

Signal Transduction Mechanisms in T lymphocytes– Introduction

Noah Isakov*
The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences and the Cancer Research Center, Ben Gurion University of Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
*Corresponding Author: Noah Isakov, The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences and the Cancer Research Center, Ben Gurion University of Negev, P.O.B. 653, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel, Tel: 972-8-6477267, Fax: 972-8-6477626 Email:

Multicellular organisms are strictly dependent on the ability of individual cells to communicate with each other and cooperate properly to coordinate functions during embryogenesis and throughout the entire life span. A major mechanism of cellular communication is mediated by cell surface receptors that deliver signals across the plasma membrane following their engagement with cognate ligands. Since all cells express a large variety of surface receptors they can respond to many different signals provided by peptide hormones, growth factors, neurotransmitters and antigens, as well as surface molecules on neighboring cells or components of the extracellular matrix.

Studies over the past two decades yielded a multitude of evidence to substantiate a concept in which both constitutive and transient protein-protein interactions, mediated by a relatively small number of evolutionary conserved protein modules, provide the underlying framework through which signaling pathways operate. Spatially and temporally regulated protein-protein interactions that occur at the ligand-occupied receptor site promote the assembly of multi-molecular complexes where posttranslational modifications regulate molecular interactions and protein functions.

One of the most extensively studied receptors is the T cell antigenspecific receptor (TCR). T lymphocytes, which are the major players in cell-mediated immunity, are non-active under steady state conditions but undergo activation following the simultaneous engagement of their TCR [1] and co-stimulatory receptors [2-4]. The first signal is provided by TCR binding to a specific peptide antigen presented on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell (APC). This signal activates an array of enzymes essential for signal delivery across the cell membrane [5-8]. A second signal, obtained through a co-stimulatory receptor, is antigen nonspecific. It is provided by the interaction of a T cell co-stimulatory molecule, such as CD28, with one of its corresponding ligands on the surface of APC, the CD80 and CD86 proteins (also termed B7.1 and B7.2, respectively). CD28 is the only co-stimulatory receptor expressed constitutively by naïve T cells, while receptors such as OX40 and inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS; CD278) are transiently expressed following cell activation and are largely dependent upon the expression of CD28. Both signals are required for production of an effective immune response in the absence of co-stimulation; TCR signaling alone results in non-responsiveness or anergy. Furthermore, the process of T cell activation can be inhibited by the additional engagement of co-inhibitory receptors, such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1; CD279) with a PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1; CD274, also known as B7 homolog 1 (B7-H1)) on the surface of APC.

The signaling pathways downstream of the costimulatory molecules usually engage the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway generating phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) at the plasma membrane and recruiting PH domain-containing signaling molecules such as, phosphatidyl-inositol-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1). These are essential for the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) theta (PKCθ) [9], which cooperates with the protein Ser/Thr phosphatase, calcineurin [6] in transduction of signals leading, among other things, to the activation of enzymes and transcription factors, including c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and Nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT), and the synthesis and secretion of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) growth factor[10].

This Special Issue on Signal Transduction Mechanisms in T lymphocytes compile twelve manuscripts that review the current knowledge on some of the most important effector molecules and cellular mechanisms that govern and regulate T cell behavior.

In a manuscript by Makoto Yamagishi and Toshiki Watanabe, the authors discuss many of the signaling pathways that are involved in the regulation of T cell activation and differentiation and the implications of deregulated events on T cell disorders and T cell transformation leading to leukemia [11]. The authors describe crosstalk between signaling pathways that dictate developmental cues governing T cell differentiation and function under both normal physiological and pathological conditions.

Balachandra K. Gorentla and Xiao-Ping Zhong review the current information relevant to both proximal and distal TCR-linked signaling pathways and describe the role of adaptor proteins and other effector molecules in assembling the proximal signalosome required for signal transduction from the activated TCR [12]. They also discuss the role of the ζ-associated protein of 70kDa (Zap70) [5,13,14] and key adaptor proteins which serve as substrates for Zap70, including the linker for the activation of T cells (LAT), and the SH2- containing leukocyte phosphoprotein of 76 kDa (SLP-76) during the early activation phase of T cells [15,16]. T cell activation also promote the interaction of tyrosine-phosphorylated Zap70 with adaptor proteins that are not direct substrates for Zap70, such as members of the Crk adaptor protein family [17-19], which play a role in cytoskeletal reorganization and the assembly of the immunological synapse of the activated T cell [20].

A critical enzyme that operates downstream of the activated TCR is the PKCθ isoform, a member of the PKC family of Ser/Thr kinases that is expressed in all T cell subsets [9,21,22]. Productive engagement of T cells by APCs results in recruitment of PKCθ to the T cell-APC contact area where PKCθ interacts with and phosphorylates effector molecules that activate a chain of events, leading to signal transduction into the cell’s nucleus [23,24].

The role of PKCθ in the regulation of TCR proximal signaling and its potential usage as a drug target for T cell-mediated diseases is discussed by Noah Isakov [25]. PKCθ was discovered two decades ago [26] and found to be essential for mature T cell responses [27]. TCR/ CD28 engagement induces the translocation of PKCθ to the center of the immunological synapse where it undergoes posttranslational modifications and becomes fully active [28,29]. It then couples the activated TCR and the CD28 costimulatory receptor to downstream signaling pathways [30] leading to the activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), AP-1 and NF-AT transcription factors, which regulate T cell survival, activation and differentiation [31-35]. PKCθ participates in cellular mechanisms leading to excessive inflammatory responses, autoimmunity, and graft vs. host (GvH) disease, but is dispensable for beneficial immune responses against viruses and during graft vs. leukemia responses [36-38]. Based on the above observation it has been suggested that PKCθ may serve as a drug target for catalytic and allosteric inhibitors in selected T cell-mediated diseases.

CD28 is the most important co-stimulatory molecule in T cells [39], and together with ICOS, the two represent a group of co-stimulatory surface receptors that are expressed in constitutive or transient manner [40]. A second group of receptors with an opposing effect on T cells can downregulate or terminate responses of activated T cells. They are members of a group of co-inhibitory receptors that includes molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4; CD152) [41] and PD-1 [42,43].

Recent developments in the field of co-inhibitory receptors are summarized by David Escors and colleagues who emphasize the effects of PD1 interaction with its ligand, PD-L1 and the impact of activation of PD1 on the regulation of T cell activation and differentiation [44]. In addition, they discuss future directions of manipulation of coinhibitory receptors in tumor immunotherapy [45,46].

A complementary review on co-inhibitory receptors, by Bin Wei and colleagues, focuses on the PD-1 and CTLA-4 mediated inhibitory signals that potentially lead to T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infections [47].

Recent studies indicate that chronic infections are associated with increased expression of the PD-1 and CTLA-4 co-inhibitory molecules, which play similar but non-redundant roles in T cell exhaustion [48-51]. Engagement of these receptors by their ligands inhibit T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion and attenuate immune responses, while blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 restores effector functions of exhausted T cells. The authors discuss the role of effector molecules that are being recruited to the activated receptors and contribute to signal transduction leading to inhibition of protein kinase B (PKB; Akt). They further discuss PD-1 and CTLA-4 as potential drug targets during chronic viral infections that may enhance antiviral T cell activity.

The current understanding of the biological function and mechanism of action of co-inhibitory receptors during the early stage of T cell activation is further discussed by Jean G. Sathish and colleagues [52]. This comprehensive review relates to the role and the mechanism of action of many known co-inhibitory receptors, including CTLA-4, PD-1, B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor (LAIR-1), T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (TIM-3), T cell Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT) and sialylated glycoconjugates (siglecs) proteins in activated T cells [53,54]. The effects of the co-inhibitory receptors are mediated by extracellular mechanisms, such as ectodomain competition with counter receptors, or intracellular mechanisms mediated by protein phosphatases that counteract positive signals mediated by protein kinases. It is believed that co-inhibitory receptors can fine-tune the quality and strength of T cell-mediated immune response by acting as a checkpoint and threshold-setters, or modulators of activation and feedback mechanisms [55-57].

The activation process of T cells involves dramatic morphological changes leading to formation of the immunological synapse at the contact site with APC, secretion of specific cytokines and lytic granules in a polarized manner, and extravasation across vascular endothelium during inflammation. The morphological changes that occur in activated T cells are summarized by Mira Barda-Saad and colleagues [58] who review the current knowledge on the role of actin and actin regulatory proteins, including Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) and WASp family verprolin-homologous protein (WAVE) during cellular remodeling that drive the effector functions [59]. The authors emphasize the role of actin regulating proteins in reorganization of the cell cytoskeleton. In particular, they focus on the structure and function of the WASp and WAVE [60,61] and address pathological aspects related to defects in these proteins and the relevant therapeutic approaches, including gene therapy and stem cell transplantation [62,63].

In an additional manuscript, Stefanie Kliche and colleagues [64] review recent findings relevant to adhesion and degranulationpromoting adapter protein (ADAP), Src kinase associated protein of 55 kDa (SKAP55), and SKAP-homologue (SKAP-HOM) cytosolic adapter proteins, which regulate inside-out/outside-in signaling of integrins [65,66]. Some of these proteins also play an essential role in the assembly of PKCθ/CBM/TRAF6/ADAP/TAK1 signalosomes that regulate JNK activity and JNK-dependent activation of NF-κB and Cdk2 [67]. The authors also examine and compare structure-function relationships of these proteins and discuss their role in T-cell adhesion, migration and proliferation.

Yashaswini Kannan and Mark S. Wilson further discuss the role of the tyrosine-protein kinase, Tec, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways in T helper (TH) cell development, TH2 differentiation and allergic asthma [68]. They summarize the current knowledge on the role of Tec and MAPK in T cell development and differentiation with an emphasis on TH2 cells [69-72]. In addition, they concentrate on the role of TH2 cells in allergy development and provide a brief update on potential kinase inhibitors that were tested both in vitro and in vivo [73-75].

The review manuscript by Raffi Gugasyan and colleagues focuses on the role of NF-κB in T-lymphocyte development and function [76]. NF-κB is a ubiquitous transcription factor that regulates expression of a wide range of genes [77]. The review concentrates on the role of NF- κB in the process of T cell maturation in the thymus and on T-helper cell polarization to functionally distinct peripheral T cell subsets [78,79] and discusses crosstalk mechanisms between NF-κB and other signaling pathways in T cells [80,81].

Dietmar Zehn and colleagues [82] summarize the current understanding and the functional importance of low affinity T cells during infection, autoimmunity and cancer diseases, and discuss the mechanism by which T cell function is influenced by TCR affinity and TCR signal strength [83]. They also discuss the impact of inhibitory and activating receptors on the function of T cells possessing TCR with different affinity to antigens.

The last review in this Special Issue is devoted to signaling molecules and effector mechanisms that regulate metabolic processes in T lymphocytes undergoing cell activation [84], with emphasis on enzymes, such as phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), AKT, and adenosine-monophosphate- activated protein kinase (AMPK) [85-87]. Jonathan A. Lindquist and colleagues, discuss the metabolic profiles of activated T cells that characterize their differentiation into distinct T cell subsets and describe the mechanisms by which key molecules, such as AKT and AMPK, accomplish their tasks.

Collectively, the reviews included in this Special Issue demonstrate the complexity of signaling networks involved in the regulation of T cell behavior. They discuss the role of distinct surface receptors in signal delivery across the plasma membrane and the complexity of the crosstalk between various signaling pathways. Identification of all players in these ‘arena’ and characterization of their mechanism of action will facilitate the future design of new drugs and implementation of new therapeutic protocols for application in a range of diseases.


Work in our laboratory is supported by the USA-Israel Binational Science Foundation and the Israel Science Foundation administered by the Israel Academy of Science and Humanities. N.I. holds the Joseph H. Krupp Chair in Cancer Immunobiology.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.


  1. Samelson LE, Donovan JA, Isakov N, Ota Y, Wange RL (1995) Signal transduction mediated by the T-cell antigen receptor. Ann N Y Acad Sci 766: 157-172.
  2. Dustin ML, Shaw AS (1999) Costimulation: building an immunological synapse. Science 283: 649-650.
  3. Lichtenfels R, Rappl G, Hombach AA, Recktenwald CV, Dressler SP, et al. (2012) A proteomic view at T cell costimulation. PLoS One 7: e32994.
  4. Kinnear G, Jones ND, Wood KJ (2013) Costimulation blockade: current perspectives and implications for therapy. Transplantation 95: 527-535.
  5. van Oers NS, Weiss A (1995) The Syk/ZAP-70 protein tyrosine kinase connection to antigen receptor signalling processes. Semin Immunol 7: 227-236.
  6. Clipstone NA, Crabtree GR (1992) Identification of calcineurin as a key signalling enzyme in T-lymphocyte activation. Nature 357: 695-697.
  7. Isakov N, Biesinger B (2000) Lck protein tyrosine kinase is a key regulator of T-cell activation and a target for signal intervention by Herpesvirus saimiri and other viral gene products. Eur J Biochem 267: 3413-3421.
  8. Isakov N, Bleackley RC, Shaw J, Altman A (1985) Teleocidin and phorbol ester tumor promoters exert similar mitogenic effects on human lymphocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 130: 724-731.
  9. Isakov N, Altman A (2002) Protein kinase C(theta) in T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol 20: 761-794.
  10. O'Keefe SJ, Tamura J, Kincaid RL, Tocci MJ, O'Neill EA (1992) FK-506- and CsA-sensitive activation of the interleukin-2 promoter by calcineurin. Nature 357: 692-694.
  11. Yamagishi M, Watanabe T (2012) New Paradigm of T cell Signaling: Learning from Malignancies. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 007.
  12. Gorentla BK, Zhong XP (2012) T cell Receptor Signal Transduction in T lymphocytes. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 005.
  13. Isakov N, Wange RL, Watts JD, Aebersold R, Samelson LE (1996) Purification and characterization of human ZAP-70 protein-tyrosine kinase from a baculovirus expression system. J Biol Chem 271: 15753-15761.
  14. Wang H, Kadlecek TA, Au-Yeung BB, Goodfellow HE, Hsu LY, et al. (2010) ZAP-70: an essential kinase in T-cell signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a002279.
  15. Zhang W, Sloan-Lancaster J, Kitchen J, Trible RP, Samelson LE (1998) LAT: the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase substrate that links T cell receptor to cellular activation. Cell 92: 83-92.
  16. Bubeck Wardenburg J, Fu C, Jackman JK, Flotow H, Wilkinson SE, et al. (1996) Phosphorylation of SLP-76 by the ZAP-70 protein-tyrosine kinase is required for T-cell receptor function. J Biol Chem 271: 19641-19644.
  17. Isakov N (1993) Tyrosine phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in T lymphocyte activation. Mol Immunol 30: 197-210.
  18. Gelkop S, Isakov N (1999) T cell activation stimulates the association of enzymatically active tyrosine-phosphorylated ZAP-70 with the Crk adapter proteins. J Biol Chem 274: 21519-21527.
  19. Gelkop S, Gish GD, Babichev Y, Pawson T, Isakov N (2005) T cell activation-induced CrkII binding to the Zap70 protein tyrosine kinase is mediated by Lck-dependent phosphorylation of Zap70 tyrosine 315. J Immunol 175: 8123-8132.
  20. Sasahara Y, Rachid R, Byrne MJ, de la Fuente MA, Abraham RT, et al. (2002) Mechanism of recruitment of WASP to the immunological synapse and of its activation following TCR ligation. Mol Cell 10: 1269-1281.
  21. Meller N, Altman A, Isakov N (1998) New perspectives on PKCtheta, a member of the novel subfamily of protein kinase C. Stem Cells 16: 178-192.
  22. Altman A, Isakov N, Baier G (2000) Protein kinase Ctheta: a new essential superstar on the T-cell stage. Immunol Today 21: 567-573.
  23. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Sciaky N, Kupfer A (1998) Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395: 82-86.
  24. Monks CR, Kupfer H, Tamir I, Barlow A, Kupfer A (1997) Selective modulation of protein kinase C-theta during T-cell activation. Nature 385: 83-86.
  25. Isakov N (2012) PKC? is a Key Regulator of T-cell Behavior and a Drug Target for T cell-mediated Diseases. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 008.
  26. Baier G, Telford D, Giampa L, Coggeshall KM, Baier-Bitterlich G, et al. (1993) Molecular cloning and characterization of PKC theta, a novel member of the protein kinase C (PKC) gene family expressed predominantly in hematopoietic cells. J Biol Chem 268: 4997-5004.
  27. Sun Z, Arendt CW, Ellmeier W, Schaeffer EM, Sunshine MJ, et al. (2000) PKC-theta is required for TCR-induced NF-kappaB activation in mature but not immature T lymphocytes. Nature 404: 402-407.
  28. Yokosuka T, Kobayashi W, Sakata-Sogawa K, Takamatsu M, Hashimoto-Tane A, et al. (2008) Spatiotemporal regulation of T cell costimulation by TCR-CD28 microclusters and protein kinase C theta translocation. Immunity 29: 589-601.
  29. Vardhana S, Choudhuri K, Varma R, Dustin ML (2010) Essential role of ubiquitin and TSG101 protein in formation and function of the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 32: 531-540.
  30. Kong KF, Yokosuka T, Canonigo-Balancio AJ, Isakov N, Saito T, et al. (2011) A motif in the V3 domain of the kinase PKC-θ determines its localization in the immunological synapse and functions in T cells via association with CD28. Nat Immunol 12: 1105-1112.
  31. Baier-Bitterlich G, Uberall F, Bauer B, Fresser F, Wachter H, et al. (1996) Protein kinase C-theta isoenzyme selective stimulation of the transcription factor complex AP-1 in T lymphocytes. Mol Cell Biol 16: 1842-1850.
  32. Coudronniere N, Villalba M, Englund N, Altman A (2000) NF-kappa B activation induced by T cell receptor/CD28 costimulation is mediated by protein kinase C-theta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 3394-3399.
  33. Dienz O, Hehner SP, Droge W, Schmitz ML (2000) Synergistic activation of NF-kappa B by functional cooperation between vav and PKCtheta in T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 275: 24547-24551.
  34. Lin X, O'Mahony A, Mu Y, Geleziunas R, Greene WC (2000) Protein kinase C-theta participates in NF-kappaB activation induced by CD3-CD28 costimulation through selective activation of IkappaB kinase beta. Mol Cell Biol 20: 2933-2940.
  35. Pfeifhofer C, Kofler K, Gruber T, Tabrizi NG, Lutz C, et al. (2003) Protein kinase C theta affects Ca2+ mobilization and NFAT cell activation in primary mouse T cells. J Exp Med 197: 1525-1535.
  36. Giannoni F, Lyon AB, Wareing MD, Dias PB, Sarawar SR (2005) Protein kinase C theta is not essential for T-cell-mediated clearance of murine gammaherpesvirus 68. J Virol 79: 6808-6813.
  37. Anderson K, Fitzgerald M, Dupont M, Wang T, Paz N, et al. (2006) Mice deficient in PKC theta demonstrate impaired in vivo T cell activation and protection from T cell-mediated inflammatory diseases. Autoimmunity 39: 469-478.
  38. Valenzuela JO, Iclozan C, Hossain MS, Prlic M, Hopewell E, et al. (2009) PKCtheta is required for alloreactivity and GVHD but not for immune responses toward leukemia and infection in mice. J Clin Invest 119: 3774-3786.
  39. Lenschow DJ, Walunas TL, Bluestone JA (1996) CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu Rev Immunol 14: 233-258.
  40. Hutloff A, Dittrich AM, Beier KC, Eljaschewitsch B, Kraft R, et al. (1999) ICOS is an inducible T-cell co-stimulator structurally and functionally related to CD28. Nature 397: 263-266.
  41. Kearney ER, Walunas TL, Karr RW, Morton PA, Loh DY, et al. (1995) Antigen-dependent clonal expansion of a trace population of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in vivo is dependent on CD28 costimulation and inhibited by CTLA-4. J Immunol 155: 1032-1036.
  42. Freeman GJ, Long AJ, Iwai Y, Bourque K, Chernova T, et al. (2000) Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med 192: 1027-1034.
  43. Fife BT, Pauken KE, Eagar TN, Obu T, Wu J, et al. (2009) Interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1 promote tolerance by blocking the TCR-induced stop signal. Nat Immunol 10: 1185-1192.
  44. Liechtenstein T, Dufait I, Bricogne C, Lanna A, Pen J, et al. (2012) PD-L1/PD-1 Co-Stimulation, a Brake for T cell Activation and a T cell Differentiation Signal. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 006.
  45. Mangsbo SM, Sandin LC, Anger K, Korman AJ, Loskog A, et al. (2010) Enhanced tumor eradication by combining CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade with CpG therapy. J Immunother 33: 225-235.
  46. Sierro SR, Donda A, Perret R, Guillaume P, Yagita H, et al. (2011) Combination of lentivector immunization and low-dose chemotherapy or PD-1/PD-L1 blocking primes self-reactive T cells and induces anti-tumor immunity. Eur J Immunol 41: 2217-2228.
  47. Li C, Xu X, Wang H, Wei B (2012) PD-1 and CTLA-4 Mediated Inhibitory Signaling for T cell Exhaustion during Chronic Viral Infections. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 010.
  48. Gallimore A, Glithero A, Godkin A, Tissot AC, Pluckthun A, et al. (1998) Induction and exhaustion of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes visualized using soluble tetrameric major histocompatibility complex class I-peptide complexes. J Exp Med 187: 1383-1393.
  49. Day CL, Kaufmann DE, Kiepiela P, Brown JA, Moodley ES, et al. (2006) PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is associated with T-cell exhaustion and disease progression. Nature 443: 350-354.
  50. Urbani S, Amadei B, Tola D, Massari M, Schivazappa S, et al. (2006) PD-1 expression in acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with HCV-specific CD8 exhaustion. J Virol 80: 11398-11403.
  51. Nakamoto N, Cho H, Shaked A, Olthoff K, Valiga ME, et al. (2009) Synergistic reversal of intrahepatic HCV-specific CD8 T cell exhaustion by combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000313.
  52. Thaventhiran T, Sethu S, Aw Yeang HX, Al-Huseini LM, Hamdam JM, et al. (2012) T Cell Co-inhibitory Receptors: Functions and Signalling Mechanisms. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 004.
  53. Zhu Y, Yao S, Chen L (2011) Cell surface signaling molecules in the control of immune responses: a tide model. Immunity 34: 466-478.
  54. Pardoll DM (2012) The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 252-264.
  55. Gajewski TF, Fallarino F, Fields PE, Rivas F, Alegre ML (2001) Absence of CTLA-4 lowers the activation threshold of primed CD8+ TCR-transgenic T cells: lack of correlation with Src homology domain 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase. J Immunol 166: 3900-3907.
  56. Acuto O, Di Bartolo V, Michel F (2008) Tailoring T-cell receptor signals by proximal negative feedback mechanisms. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 699-712.
  57. Odorizzi PM, Wherry EJ (2012) Inhibitory receptors on lymphocytes: insights from infections. J Immunol 188: 2957-2965.
  58. Reicher B, Perl O, Matalon O, Barda-Saad M (2012) WASp and WAVE Proteins: From Structure, Through Function, to Clinical Aspects. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 001.
  59. Vicente-Manzanares M, Sánchez-Madrid F (2004) Role of the cytoskeleton during leukocyte responses. Nat Rev Immunol 4: 110-122.
  60. McGavin MK, Badour K, Hardy LA, Kubiseski TJ, Zhang J, et al. (2001) The intersectin 2 adaptor links Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome protein (WASp)-mediated actin polymerization to T cell antigen receptor endocytosis. J Exp Med 194: 1777-1787.
  61. Chen Z, Borek D, Padrick SB, Gomez TS, Metlagel Z, et al. (2010) Structure and control of the actin regulatory WAVE complex. Nature 468: 533-538.
  62. Galy A, Thrasher AJ (2011) Gene therapy for the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 11: 545-550.
  63. Bosticardo M, Marangoni F, Aiuti A, Villa A, Grazia Roncarolo M (2009) Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Blood 113: 6288-6295.
  64. Witte A, Degen J, Baumgart K, Waldt N, Kuropka B, et al. (2012) Emerging Roles of ADAP, SKAP55, and SKAP-HOM for Integrin and NF-?B Signaling in T cells. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 002.
  65. Kliche S, Breitling D, Togni M, Pusch R, Heuer K, et al. (2006) The ADAP/SKAP55 signaling module regulates T-cell receptor-mediated integrin activation through plasma membrane targeting of Rap1. Mol Cell Biol 26: 7130-7144.
  66. Burbach BJ, Srivastava R, Ingram MA, Mitchell JS, Shimizu Y (2011) The pleckstrin homology domain in the SKAP55 adapter protein defines the ability of the adapter protein ADAP to regulate integrin function and NF-kappaB activation. J Immunol 186: 6227-6237.
  67. Srivastava R, Burbach BJ, Mitchell JS, Pagán AJ, Shimizu Y (2012) ADAP regulates cell cycle progression of T cells via control of cyclin E and Cdk2 expression through two distinct CARMA1-dependent signaling pathways. Mol Cell Biol 32: 1908-1917.
  68. Kannan Y, Wilson MS (2012) TEC and MAPK Kinase Signalling Pathways in T helper (TH) cell Development, TH2 Differentiation and Allergic Asthma. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 011.
  69. Schwartzberg PL, Finkelstein LD, Readinger JA (2005) TEC-family kinases: regulators of T-helper-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 284-295.
  70. Berg LJ, Finkelstein LD, Lucas JA, Schwartzberg PL (2005) Tec family kinases in T lymphocyte development and function. Annu Rev Immunol 23: 549-600.
  71. Kyriakis JM, Avruch J (2012) Mammalian MAPK signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation: a 10-year update. Physiol Rev 92: 689-737.
  72. Tripathi P, Sahoo N, Ullah U, Kallionpää H, Suneja A, et al. (2012) A novel mechanism for ERK-dependent regulation of IL4 transcription during human Th2-cell differentiation. Immunol Cell Biol 90: 676-687.
  73. Lloyd CM, Hessel EM (2010) Functions of T cells in asthma: more than just T(H)2 cells. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 838-848.
  74. Herdemann M, Weber A, Jonveaux J, Schwoebel F, Stoeck M, et al. (2011) Optimisation of ITK inhibitors through successive iterative design cycles. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 21: 1852-1856.
  75. Dudley DT, Pang L, Decker SJ, Bridges AJ, Saltiel AR (1995) A synthetic inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 7686-7689.
  76. de Valle E, Lie LK, Berzins SP, Gugasyan R (2012) The Role of NF?B in T-lymphocyte Development and Function. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 009.
  77. Li X, Stark GR (2002) NFkappaB-dependent signaling pathways. Exp Hematol 30: 285-296.
  78. Livolsi A, Busuttil V, Imbert V, Abraham RT, Peyron JF (2001) Tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent activation of NF-kappa B. Requirement for p56 LCK and ZAP-70 protein tyrosine kinases. Eur J Biochem 268: 1508-1515.
  79. Gerondakis S, Siebenlist U (2010) Roles of the NF-kappaB pathway in lymphocyte development and function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000182.
  80. Osipo C, Golde TE, Osborne BA, Miele LA (2008) Off the beaten pathway: the complex cross talk between Notch and NF-kappaB. Lab Invest 88: 11-17.
  81. Ravi R, Mookerjee B, van Hensbergen Y, Bedi GC, Giordano A, et al. (1998) p53-mediated repression of nuclear factor-kappaB RelA via the transcriptional integrator p300. Cancer Res 58: 4531-4536.
  82. Hebeisen M, Rufer N, Oberle S, Speiser DE, Zehn D (2012) Signaling Mechanisms that Balance Anti-viral, Auto-reactive, and Anti-tumor Potential of Low Affinity T Cells. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 003.
  83. Palmer E, Naeher D (2009) Affinity threshold for thymic selection through a T-cell receptor-co-receptor zipper. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 207-213.
  84. Cammann C, Schraven B, Lindquist JA (2012) T cell Metabolism–Regulating Energy. J Clin Cell Immunol S12: 012.
  85. Fox CJ, Hammerman PS, Thompson CB (2005) Fuel feeds function: energy metabolism and the T-cell response. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 844-852.
  86. Frauwirth KA, Riley JL, Harris MH, Parry RV, Rathmell JC, et al. (2002) The CD28 signaling pathway regulates glucose metabolism. Immunity 16: 769-777.
  87. Jones RG, Thompson CB (2007) Revving the engine: signal transduction fuels T cell activation. Immunity 27: 173-178.
Citation: Isakov N (2013) Signal Transduction Mechanisms in T lymphocytes– Introduction. J Clin Cell Immunol S12:e001.

Copyright: © 2013 Isakov N. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.