Journal of Clinical Trials

Journal of Clinical Trials
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0870

+44 1478 350008

Awards 2021 - (2020)

Randomised Outstanding Ethical Clinical Trials

Sara Drew*
*Correspondence: Sara Drew, Pathology Unit, Regional Hospital Buea, Cameroon, Email:

Author info »

E thics is about judgment, which is rarely black and white. This highlights some of the ethical dilemmas that face practicing clinicians in their everyday life and restates how useful the General Medical Council guidance is to make appropriate decisions. The authors have faced all eight of the clinical scenarios in this paper in their routine clinical practice.

H owever, being suspicious is enough and you should not use your lack of evidence as an excuse for ignoring the issue. You might find it difficult to discuss your concerns with the consultant directly, but this should be your first action if possible. What you believe to be the case may have a simple explanation. If you are not satisfied with the response you get from the consultant or do not feel that you can directly address it with him/her then you should inform someone of appropriate authority of your concerns. This may be another consultant for whom you have some regard. It may be helpful to make a confidential file note of all the facts relating to the incident so you have something to help your recall in the future.

Academic Research

The award for professional or academic research activity acquired in Good clinical practices. Event research field in the public or private sector for experts having research knowledge at 10+ years with most relevant accomplishments. Part-time research experience would be counted as pro-rata. It is calculated from the date when you obtained the (first) degree entitling you to embark on a doctorate (either in the country in which the degree was obtained or in the country in which the researcher is recruited), even if a doctorate was never started or envisaged. You can nominate deserving of the award online.

Scholar Level

The conference offers a Scholar Level award for scientists, researchers, and experts having 10+ years of research experience in the field of clinical practices Congress. Our conference would like to offer the best platform to expand your network by sharing your research knowledge. Presentation includes 25-30 minutes of oral talk on the scientific research topics based on the theme of the conference along with 5 minutes panel discussions. You can nominate deserving of the award online

Best Keynote Speaker

The award is recognized for Best Keynote speakers who will present their projects, strategies, and schemes that have been implemented to improve long-term excellence in clinical practices meet. If you were confirmed as a keynote presenter by the Program Manager, you can nominate deserving of the award online.

Best Poster Presentation

Students' poster competition is organized at the conference, to encourage students and recent graduates to present their original research. All accepted abstracts will be presented at the poster sessions during the conference. Conference Series aims at setting a platform for all the budding scientists and researchers to present their real-time work and share their views and aspects related to the theme of the conference. You can nominate deserving of the award online.

Outstanding Thesis

The award is recognizing for Masters/Ph.D./Post Doctorate thesis work presentations who will exhibit their projects and thesis that have been implemented to improve long-term excellence in the field of clinical practices Congress. You can nominate deserving of the award online.

Contact Name: Sara Drew
WhatsApp at: +44-1623-4865232

Author Info

Sara Drew*
Pathology Unit, Regional Hospital Buea, Cameroon

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.