GET THE APP

Novel Immunotherapy to Eliminate Minimal Residual Disease in AML Patients
Journal of Hematology & Thromboembolic Diseases

Journal of Hematology & Thromboembolic Diseases
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-8790

+44 20 3868 9735

Review Article - (2013) Volume 1, Issue 3

Novel Immunotherapy to Eliminate Minimal Residual Disease in AML Patients

Hongtao Liu* and Justin Kline
Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
*Corresponding Author: Hongtao Liu, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, USA, Tel: (773) 834-0589, Fax: (773) 702-3163 Email:

Abstract

Even with the most sophisticated chemotherapy regimens, the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia will eventually experience a relapse and die from their disease. New treatments are needed to prevent relapse of disease in these patients. Immunotherapy using the host immune system to combat leukemia represents an exciting and potentially efficacious addition to standard chemotherapy for AML. Immune-base treatments may be particularly effective when administered at a time when patients are in clinical remission with normal blood counts; nevertheless, these patients often have minimal residual disease which eventually results in disease relapse. Successful vaccinationbased immunotherapy targeting leukemia-specific antigens will likely require the administration of powerful immune adjutants and removal of negative immune regulatory pathways in order to achieve maximal efficacy. This review article will focus on the rationales underlying our ongoing clinical trial to test the efficacy of WT1 peptide based immunotherapy using TLR3 agonist as adjuvant in combination of the depletion of T regulatory cells with anti-CD25 antibody in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Immunotherapy; WT1; T regulatory cells; TLR

Introduction

Standard chemotherapy for adults with AML (Acute Myeloid leukemia) can induce remission but is not curative for the majority of patients who will eventually relapse and die of their disease. Immunotherapy represents a potentially efficacious adjunct to standard AML therapy, particularly for those in the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) state during which immune-based therapies may be most effective. Unfortunately, the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy has been limited by a number of immune evasion pathways which suppress anti-tumor immunity and enable tumor progression. A major focus of our research group has been to characterize immune evasion pathways promoted by AML with the ultimate goal of blocking such pathways to unleash the full effectiveness of immunotherapy for leukemia.

A strong candidate mechanism for immune evasion in AML is the expansion of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) [1,2]. Treg accumulate in the blood of AML patients and their numbers correlate negatively with response to chemotherapy [2]. Depletion of Treg in murine models has been shown to improve immune-mediated tumor control [3,4]. Treg depletion has been achieved in cancer patients using an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody [5,6], making it possible to test the impact of Treg depletion coupled with immune-based therapies in AML patients.

AML Treatment in the elderly patients

Currently, there is no universally accepted standard of care treatment for older adults with AML. Although older adults with AML often achieve a complete remission, the median disease free survival is only around 6.1 months without further consolidation chemotherapy [7], and the efficacy of standard consolidation chemotherapy for this patient cohort has not been proven to improve survival. Thus, new strategies need to be developed for post-remission management of the elderly patient with AML. Even for young AML patients who are able to complete intensive chemotherapy consolidation or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, disease relapse remains the major failure of treatment for which novel; non toxic treatments are badly needed.

Immunotherapy of cancer

Over the past decades, evidence has mounted suggesting that the immune system can play an important role in the elimination of malignant cells. Many tumors express specific antigens and allow them to be recognized by CD8+ T cells in particular (reviewed in [8]), and increased numbers of tumor-specific T cells can be generated in cancer patients through either vaccination with tumor-specific antigens or adoptive T cell therapy (reviewed in [9]). However, despite the fact that the immune system appears to be “aware” of a growing malignancy, spontaneous clearance of established tumors is rare, suggesting the existence of downstream mechanisms that inhibit anti-tumor immune responses [10]. Several of such mechanisms have been described, including extrinsic suppression by CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), T cell anergy, diminished T cell activation by engagement of negative co-stimulatory T cell molecules, such as PD-1 and CTLA- 4, and tryptophan catabolism by indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) (reviewed in [10-12]). It is quite likely that these mechanisms are coordinately active in concert in established tumors. Therefore, it may be necessary to block one or more of these negative regulatory pathways in combination in order to obtain a maximally effective antitumor immune response in patients.

WT1 is a leukemia associated antigen

The development of cancer vaccines directed against leukemia has been a research area of intense interest in the past decade [13]. Among the identified leukemia-associated antigens (LAAs), Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) is a leading candidate antigen. The WT1 protein is a zinc finger transcription factor that is normally expressed in tissues of mesodermal origin during embryogenesis. In normal adult tissues, WT1 expression is minimal, while WT1 is over-expressed in most cases of AML, CML, MDS, ALL, and in several solid tumors [11]. WT1 mRNA level in the peripheral blood and bone marrow is now being used as a marker of minimal residual disease [14]. Furthermore, antibodies to WT1 and WT1-specific Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTLs) were detected in patients with hematopoietic malignancies, indicating that WT1 is an immunogenic antigen [15]. WT1 peptide vaccines have been used in a number of clinical trials conducted in various cancer types [16]. For example, a phase I trial using a WT1 peptide-based vaccine for patients with AML and MDS revealed that 7 of the 14 patients showed clinical responses such as a reduction of leukemic cells and/or WT1 mRNA level [17]. A phase II clinical trial in AML and high-risk MDS using a WT1 peptide vaccine demonstrated that an immunologic response was observed in 44% patients, and objective clinical responses were observed in 10 out of 17 AML patients [18]. While there are reports from small case series which have suggested that WT1 vaccination can have long term efficacy in patients [19,20], other groups have observed that that repeated peptide vaccination in Montanide failed to induce sustained high-avidity, epitope-specific T cell responses in treated patients [21]. In addition, Lehe et al. [22] generated WT1 specific T-cell clones which carried a CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg phenotype, and which significantly inhibited the proliferation and function of allogeneic CD8+ CTL induced by WT1 peptide vaccination. These data demonstrate that WT1 is not only an antigenic target in AML, but also can result in the generation of Treg, which provides rationale for coupling WT1 vaccination with Treg depletion as an attractive approach to be tested. The finding of enhanced tumor immunity of WT1 peptide vaccination by interferon-beta administration [23] supports the notion to utilize a TLR agonist as a vaccine adjuvant in this setting, which will be further discussed below.

Characterization of the WT1 specific CD8+ T cell repertoire

Recent developments in deep sequencing technology makes it now possible to analyze the antigen-specific T cell receptor repertoire (reviewed in [24]), which is present in hosts after peptide vaccination. Because WT1 peptide vaccination has routinely led to a robust expansion of WT1-specific CD8+ T cells [17,25], it will be interesting to analyze the clonality of WT1-specific CTLs generated in this context. We hope to gain a better understanding of the WT1-specific CTL response after WT1 peptide vaccination, and further to obtain clues as to how to enhance WT1-specific CTL responses in WT1-based immunotherapy approaches. Studies from Japanese groups clearly demonstrated biased usage of TCR-Vβ gene families in WT1 peptide vaccinated patients [26,27]; the group in Germany observed the WT1 vaccination-induced expansion of a preexisting low abundant TCR clone, which became a specific predominant clone after WT1 peptide vaccination [28]. The bias towards Vβ11 usage of the WT1-specific CTL populations was confirmed in all four patients following a single peptide vaccination [29]. In addition, the identification of a WT1-specific TCR sequence could provide the basis for adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded WT1- specific TCR engineered CTLs [30].

The role of Treg in AML

Tregs express a high level of the FoxP3 transcription factor which delineates this subpopulation of CD4+ T cells. Tregs are a population of immune suppressive cells which are critical to prevent autoimmune diseases under physiological conditions. Tregs also expand in cancer patients and are often enriched in the tumor microenvironment. Depletion of Treg can render mice capable of rejecting tumors that normally grow progressively [31]. Several groups have shown that depletion of Treg can improve anti-tumor immunity in combination with vaccination [32]. The frequency of Treg in the peripheral blood of AML patients was found to be significantly higher than that of healthy individuals [1]. Further, Treg numbers correlate negatively with response to chemotherapy in AML patients, and patients who achieved a complete response after induction chemotherapy had lower Treg frequencies at baseline, compared with non-responders [2]. Interestingly, human AML cells also promoted the differentiation of CD4+CD25- T cells to CD4+CD25+ Treg in vitro, which might partially explain the high Treg frequencies often observed in AML patients [33]. Collectively, these data suggest that AML can not only promote the expansion of naturally-generated Treg, but also that they can mediate Treg induction. Thus, Treg appear to play important role in the pathogenesis of refractory or relapsed AML [34].

Toll-Like receptor ligands as vaccine adjuvants

Toll-Like receptors (TLR), which recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns, have recently emerged as a critical component of the innate immune system for detecting microbial infection and activation of dendritic cell maturation programs to induce adaptive immune responses [35,36]. Stimulation of TLR signaling pathways activates dendritic cells and induces the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as type-I IFN and IL-12, leading to a Th1-skewed response favoring cytotoxic T-cell differentiation. It has been reported that TLR signaling on dendritic cells by CpG or LPS renders effector cells refractory to Treg–mediated suppression [37]. Stimulation of dendritic cells with TLR ligands significantly enhances the proliferation of naive and effector T cells, making it more difficult for Treg cells to inhibit them [38,39]. These findings offer new strategies to develop more effective immunotherapy by employing TLRs agonist as vaccine adjuvants. TLR3 agonists have been used in the past, with variable efficiency, as an adjuvant to treat cancer patients, with the aim of inducing an IFN-mediated anti-cancer immune response [40,41]. Hiltonol (poly-ICLC) (Oncovir, Inc, Washington, DC), is a clinical grade stabilized TLR3 agonist containing poly-L-lysine and carboxymethyl cellulose (poly-ICLC), which has been used in several clinical trials [42-45]. An open study evaluating the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment of malignant gliomas with intramuscularly administrated poly-ICLC [42] demonstrated that poly-ICLC administration was welltolerated with little or no toxicity, and 66% patients had stable disease or disease regression by MRI. Even though poly-ICLC administration by itself was not active in advanced renal carcinoma [46] and recurrent anaplastic glioma [45], combination of poly-ICLC with radiation or with concurrent adjuvant temozolomide had improved efficacy in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma [43,44]. Most recently, poly ICLC was demonstrated to induce rapid immune response in ovarian cancer patient when it was used as adjuvant for tumor self-antigen [47]. These data demonstrate the safety of poly-ICLC in humans, and combined with preclinical data showing the immune potentiating effect of this TLR ligand with vaccines, support its clinical application for a vaccine adjuvant in patients.

Depletion of Treg in vivo

Because most Tregs express high levels of CD25 (IL2-receptoralpha) on their cell surface, targeting CD25 has been exploited to deplete Tregs from humans in vivo. Ontak (denileukin diftitox) is a recombinant fusion protein between human IL-2 and a fragment of diptheria toxin [48]. Interestingly, Ontak is capable of killing normal T cells that express CD25; including the Treg subset which is contained within the CD25+ population. This was confirmed in a study from Vieweg and colleagues who observed that a single dose of Ontak did indeed decrease detectable CD4+CD25+ T cells from the circulation [3]. In addition, the magnitude of the specific immune response to the vaccine appeared to be much greater than what was seen without Ontak [3]. However, a number of follow-up studies in which Ontak was utilized to deplete Treg did not find that Ontak led to a significant depth or duration of Treg depletion. Daclizumab (Zenapax) is a monoclonal anti-CD25 antibody which blocks the interaction of IL-2 and CD25. Rech et al. demonstrated that single dose of Daclizuamb at 1 mg/kg caused marked and prolonged elimination of Treg for more than 5 weeks in patients with metastatic breast cancer when combined with a cancer vaccine [5,6]. Unfortunately, daclizumab has since been removed from the market and is no longer available. On the other hand, basiliximab (Simulect), a similar anti-CD25 antibody, is currently FDA-approved to prevent renal allograft rejection. Several reports have demonstrated that Basiliximab is capable of decreasing the number of circulating Treg in humans [49,50]. Recently, Okita et al. demonstrated that lowdose basiliximab can safely be administrated repeatedly, and can target CD4+CD25high Treg cells while relatively preserving CD4+CD25low activated T cells, suggesting that Basiliximab could be used to deplete Treg and augment the efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy of cancer [51]. All these available data suggest that monoclonal anti-CD25 antibodies may be useful to deplete Treg and enhance the efficacy of immune response induced by peptide vaccination.

Rationale for an approach for WT1 vaccination in combination with Treg depletion in AML patients

Based on the positive clinical results with WT1 peptide immunization, along with observations regarding suppression of anti-tumor immunity by Treg, a logical strategy for improving leukemia peptide-based vaccine therapy has emerged. An open-label, randomized phase I study assessing administration of WT1 vaccine +/- TLR3 agonist (poly ICLC) alone or post-basiliximab in AML patients who are not candidates for stem cell transplant due to advanced age and co-morbidities or who refuse stem cell transplant is proposed. HLAA0201- positive patients in complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery after induction chemotherapy (repeat induction chemotherapy or consolidation chemotherapy is allowed), will be eligible. Each patient will undergo serial measurement of Treg cells from the peripheral blood weekly for 4 weeks prior to the stratification to Arm A (WT1 peptide vaccine in Montanide) or Arm B (WT1 peptide vaccine in TLR3 agonist, poly-ICLC).

In the initial stage of the study, 24 patients will be randomized to Arm A or Arm B (12 patients in each arm). Cellular immune responses, as measured by IFN-γ ELISPOT following stimulation with WT1 peptide, will be used to determine whether Arm A or Arm B will be superior, and basiliximab will be given prior to peptide vaccination using the superior vaccination regimen to form Arm C (12 patients will be included in Arm C). In the Basiliximab group (Arm C), a single dose of Basiliximab 20 mg will be given intravenously over 30 minutes seven days prior to the initial vaccination (Day -7, 3 weeks after confirmed CR). All patients will receive 100 ul (1000 mcg) WT1 126-134 peptide (RMFPNAPYL), which is an HLA-A*0201-restricted peptide, in Montanide as an emulsion or in TLR3 agonist, poly ICLC, 1mg in 1ml aqueous solution administered intradermally/subcutaneously every 2 weeks × 6, starting on Day 0 of the study (4 weeks after confirmed CR). Disease re-evaluation will be performed every 6 weeks. Treg counts by flow cytometry, FoxP3 and WT1 expression by qRT-PCR, and peptidespecific immunologic responses will be monitored over time. Patients without disease progression after 6 vaccinations can be continued on additional cycles of 6 monthly vaccinations, but no further Basiliximab will be administered.

The protocol for this study was approved by IRB at University of Chicago, and the IND application for WT1 peptide was approved by the FDA. With the support by a grant from American Cancer Society, we were able to enroll five patients to the clinical trial to date. The clinical and correlative immune responses data will be presently separately in the future.

Conclusion

Relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure for patients with AML, even after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Immunotherapy may be useful to eliminate MRD present following standard therapies, which could reduce the risk of disease relapse. The understanding of the immune evasion mechanisms and the ability to interfere with them may open the door for the delivery of effective immunotherapy. Logical combinations to suppress multiple negative regulators of tumor immune responses will likely be required in order to maximize the efficacy of immunotherapy, and thus positively affect the natural course of AML.

References

  1. Wang X, Zheng J, Liu J, Yao J, He Y, et al. (2005) Increased population of CD4(+)CD25(high), regulatory T cells with their higher apoptotic and proliferating status in peripheral blood of acute myeloid leukemia patients. Eur J Haematol 75: 468-476.
  2. Szczepanski MJ, Szajnik M, Czystowska M, Mandapathil M, Strauss L, et al. (2009) Increased frequency and suppression by regulatory T cells in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 15: 3325-3332.
  3. Dannull J , Su Z, Rizzieri D, Yang BK, Coleman D, Yancey, et al. (2005) Enhancement of vaccine-mediated antitumor immunity in cancer patients after depletion of regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest 115: 3623-3633.
  4. Morse MA, Hobeika AC, Osada T, Serra D, Niedzwiecki D, et al. (2008) Depletion of human regulatory T cells specifically enhances antigen-specific immune responses to cancer vaccines. Blood 112: 610-618.
  5. Rech AJ, Vonderheide RH (2009) Clinical use of anti-CD25 antibody daclizumab to enhance immune responses to tumor antigen vaccination by targeting regulatory T cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1174: 99-106.
  6. Rech AJ, Mick R, Martin S, Recio A, Aqui NA, et al. (2012) CD25 blockade depletes and selectively reprograms regulatory T cells in concert with immunotherapy in cancer patients. Sci Transl Med 4: 134ra62.
  7. Baer MR, George SL, Caligiuri MA, Sanford BL, Bothun SM, et al. ( 2008) Low-dose interleukin-2 immunotherapy does not improve outcome of patients age 60 years and older with Leukemia Group acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: Cancer and B Study 9720. J Clin Oncol 26: 4934-4939.
  8. Neller MA, López JA, Schmidt CW (2008) Antigens for cancer immunotherapy. Semin Immunol 20: 286-295.
  9. Dougan M, Dranoff G (2009) Immune therapy for cancer. Annu Rev Immunol 27: 83-117.
  10. Gajewski TF, Meng Y, Blank C, Brown I, Kacha A, et al. (2006) Immune resistance orchestrated by the tumor microenvironment. Immunol Rev 213: 131-145.
  11. Zou W (2006) Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 295-307.
  12. Colombo MP, Piconese S (2007) Regulatory-T-cell inhibition versus depletion: the right choice in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 7: 880-887.
  13. Dao T, Scheinberg DA (2008) Peptide vaccines for myeloid leukaemias. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 21: 391-404.
  14. Grimwade D, Vyas P, Freeman S (2010) Assessment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Opin Oncol 22: 656-663.
  15. Barrett AJ, Rezvani K (2007) Translational mini-review series on vaccines: Peptide vaccines for myeloid leukaemias. Clin Exp Immunol 148: 189-198.
  16. Van Driessche A, Berneman ZN, Van Tendeloo VF (2012) Active specific immunotherapy targeting the Wilms' tumor protein 1 (WT1) for patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors: lessons from early clinical trials. Oncologist 17: 250-259.
  17. Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Taguchi T, Osaki T, Kyo T, et al. (2004) Induction of WT1 (Wilms' tumor gene)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by WT1 peptide vaccine and the resultant cancer regression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 13885-13890.
  18. Keilholz U, Letsch A, Busse A, Asemissen AM, Bauer S, et al. (2009) A clinical and immunologic phase 2 trial of Wilms tumor gene product 1 (WT1) peptide vaccination in patients with AML and MDS. Blood 113: 6541-6548.
  19. Hashii Y, Sato-Miyashita E, Matsumura R, Kusuki S, Yoshida H, et al. (2012) WT1 peptide vaccination following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in pediatric leukemic patients with high risk for relapse: successful maintenance of durable remission. Leukemia 26: 530-532.
  20. Tsuboi A, Oka Y, Kyo T, Katayama Y, Elisseeva OA, et al. (2012) Long-term WT1 peptide vaccination for patients with acute myeloid leukemia with minimal residual disease. Leukemia 26: 1410-1413.
  21. Rezvani K, Yong AS, Mielke S, Jafarpour B, Savani BN, et al. (2011) Repeated PR1 and WT1 peptide vaccination in Montanide-adjuvant fails to induce sustained high-avidity, epitope-specific CD8+ T cells in myeloid malignancies. Haematologica 96: 432-440.
  22. Lehe C, Ghebeh H, Al-Sulaiman A, Al Qudaihi G, Al-Hussein K, et al. (2008) The Wilms' tumor antigen is a novel target for human CD4+ regulatory T cells: implications for immunotherapy. Cancer Res 68: 6350-6359.
  23. Nakajima H, Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Tatsumi N, Yamamoto Y, et al. (2012) Enhanced tumor immunity of WT1 peptide vaccination by interferon-β administration. Vaccine 30: 722-729.
  24. Miconnet I (2012) Probing the T-cell receptor repertoire with deep sequencing. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 7: 64-70.
  25. Maslak PG, Dao T, Krug LM, Chanel S, Korontsvit T, et al. (2010) Vaccination with synthetic analog peptides derived from WT1 oncoprotein induces T-cell responses in patients with complete remission from acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 116: 171-179.
  26. Tanaka-Harada Y, Kawakami M, Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Katagiri T, et al. (2010) Biased usage of BV gene families of T-cell receptors of WT1 (Wilms' tumor gene)-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with myeloid malignancies. Cancer Sci 101: 594-600.
  27. Morimoto S, Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Tanaka Y, Fujiki F, et al. (2012) Biased usage of T cell receptor β-chain variable region genes of Wilms' tumor gene (WT1)-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with solid tumors and healthy donors. Cancer Sci 103: 408-414.
  28. Ochsenreither S, Fusi A, Busse A, Bauer S, Scheibenbogen C, et al. (2011) "Wilms Tumor Protein 1" (WT1) peptide vaccination-induced complete remission in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia is accompanied by the emergence of a predominant T-cell clone both in blood and bone marrow. J Immunother 34: 85-91.
  29. Ochsenreither S, Fusi A, Geikowski A, Stather D, Busse A, et al. (2012) Wilms' tumor protein 1 (WT1) peptide vaccination in AML patients: predominant TCR CDR3beta sequence associated with remission in one patient is detectable in other vaccinated patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 61: 313-322.
  30. Ochi T, Fujiwara H, Okamoto S, An J, Nagai K, et al. (2011) Novel adoptive T-cell immunotherapy using a WT1-specific TCR vector encoding silencers for endogenous TCRs shows marked antileukemia reactivity and safety. Blood 118: 1495-1503.
  31. Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakaguchi S (1999) Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol 163: 5211-5218.
  32. Sutmuller RP, van Duivenvoorde LM, van Elsas A, Schumacher TN, Wildenberg ME, et al. (2001) Synergism of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade and depletion of CD25(+) regulatory T cells in antitumor therapy reveals alternative pathways for suppression of autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. J Exp Med 194: 823-832.
  33. Curti A, Aluigi M, Pandolfi S, Ferri E, Isidori A, et al. (2007) Acute myeloid leukemia cells constitutively express the immunoregulatory enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Leukemia 21: 353-355.
  34. Curti A, Pandolfi S, Valzasina B, Aluigi M, Isidori A, et al. (2007) Modulation of tryptophan catabolism by human leukemic cells results in the conversion of CD25- into CD25+ T regulatory cells. Blood 109: 2871-2877.
  35. Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R (2004) Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 5: 987-995.
  36. Pasare C, Medzhitov R (2003) Toll pathway-dependent blockade of CD4+CD25+ T cell-mediated suppression by dendritic cells. Science 299: 1033-1036.
  37. Fehervari Z, Sakaguchi S (2004) Control of Foxp3+ CD25+CD4+ regulatory cell activation and function by dendritic cells. Int Immunol 16: 1769-1780.
  38. Kubo T, Hatton RD, Oliver J, Liu X, Elson CO, et al. (2004) Regulatory T cell suppression and anergy are differentially regulated by proinflammatory cytokines produced by TLR-activated dendritic cells. J Immunol 173: 7249-7258.
  39. Lacour J, Lacour F, Spira A, Michelson M, Petit JY, et al. (1980) Adjuvant treatment with polyadenylic-polyuridylic acid (Polya.Polyu) in operable breast cancer. Lancet 2: 161-164.
  40. Khan AL, Heys SD, Eremin O (1995) Synthetic polyribonucleotides: current role and potential use in oncological practice. Eur J Surg Oncol 21: 224-227.
  41. Salazar AM, Levy HB, Ondra S, Kende M, Scherokman B, et al. (1996) Long-term treatment of malignant gliomas with intramuscularly administered polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized with polylysine and carboxymethylcellulose: an open pilot study. Neurosurgery 38: 1096-1103.
  42. Rosenfeld MR, Chamberlain MC, Grossman SA, Peereboom DM, Lesser GJ, et al. (2010) A multi-institution phase II study of poly-ICLC and radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 12: 1071-1077.
  43. Butowski N, Chang SM, Junck L, DeAngelis LM, Abrey L, et al. (2009) A phase II clinical trial of poly-ICLC with radiation for adult patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC01-05). J Neurooncol 91: 175-182.
  44. Butowski N, Lamborn KR, Lee BL, Prados MD, Cloughesy T, et al. (2009) A North American brain tumor consortium phase II study of poly-ICLC for adult patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas. J Neurooncol 91: 183-189.
  45. Giantonio BJ, Hochster H, Blum R, Wiernik PH, Hudes GR, et al. (2001) Toxicity and response evaluation of the interferon inducer poly ICLC administered at low dose in advanced renal carcinoma and relapsed or refractory lymphoma: a report of two clinical trials of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Invest New Drugs 19: 89-92.
  46. Sabbatini P, Tsuji T, Ferran L, Ritter E, Sedrak C, et al. (2012) Phase I trial of overlapping long peptides from a tumor self-antigen and poly-ICLC shows rapid induction of integrated immune response in ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 18: 6497-6508.
  47. Kuzel TM (2000) DAB(389)IL-2 (denileukin diftitox, ONTAK): review of clinical trials to date. Clin Lymphoma 1 Suppl 1: S33-36.
  48. Bluestone JA, Liu W, Yabu JM, Laszik ZG, Putnam A, et al. (2008) The effect of costimulatory and interleukin 2 receptor blockade on regulatory T cells in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 8: 2086-2096.
  49. Bloom DD, Chang Z, Fechner JH, Dar W, Polster SP, et al. (2008) CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cells increase de novo in kidney transplant patients after immunodepletion with Campath-1H. Am J Transplant 8: 793-802.
  50. Okita R, Yamaguchi Y, Ohara M, Hironaka K, Okawaki M, et al. (2009) Targeting of CD4+CD25high cells while preserving CD4+CD25low cells with low-dose chimeric anti-CD25 antibody in adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. Int J Oncol 34: 563-572.
Citation: Liu H, Kline J (2013) Novel Immunotherapy to Eliminate Minimal Residual Disease in AML Patients. J Hematol Thromb Dis 1:112.

Copyright: © 2013 Liu H, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.