GET THE APP

Microbial Keratitis at an Urban Public Hospital: A 10-Year Update
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9570

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2015) Volume 6, Issue 6

Microbial Keratitis at an Urban Public Hospital: A 10-Year Update

David T Truong, Minh-Thuy Bui, Pauras Memon and H Dwight Cavanagh*
Department of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, USA
*Corresponding Author: H Dwight Cavanagh, Department of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas TX 75390-9057, USA, Tel: (214) 648-3779, Fax: (214) 648-9061 Email:

Abstract

Purpose: To review the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiologic spectrum, and treatment of microbial keratitis during a five-year period at an urban public hospital with comparison to similar findings a decade earlier at the same hospital.
Methods: Retrospective chart review in the 5-year interval 2009 through 2014 compared to previously reported cases 2000 through 2004 [Eye & Contact Lens 33(1): 45-49, 2007]. Comparative primary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), risk factors, culture and sensitivities, treatment, and complication rates.
Results: 318 eyes with microbial keratitis were identified. Contact lens wear, ocular trauma, and ocular surface diseases were the most common risk factors. The culture and recovery rates were 73% and 66% respectively. Gram-positive organisms represented 46%, gram-negative organisms 39%, fungal organisms 15%, and Acanthamoeba <1% of corneal isolates. No common corneal pathogens were resistant to aminoglycosides or vancomycin. 48% of cases were initially treated with fortified antibiotics, 43% with fluoroquinolone monotherapy, and 6% with antifungals. 40% of cases received inpatient treatment. At resolution, average BCVA was 20/82 [logMAR 0.61] with 8% of cases resulting in light perception or worse vision. The perforation rate was 8%. 6% of cases underwent urgent penetrating keratoplasty and 4% of cases underwent urgent enucleation or evisceration. Compared to the prior study, significant differences were: (1) lower culture but higher recovery rates, (2) lower admission rate, (3) more contact lens-related cases of Pseudomonas ulcers, (4) lower resistance of coagulasenegative Staphylococcus to aminoglycoside antibiotics, (5) improved BCVA at resolution, and (6) lower associated complication rates.
Conclusion: Microbial keratitis remains a clinical challenge in the urban public hospital setting. In the past ten years, epidemiology has shifted towards greater contact lens wear with more Pseudomonal infections. Visual outcomes have not worsened despite a shift away from routine culture and inpatient care to fluoroquinolone monotherapy and outpatient management.

Keywords: Keratitis; Microbial keratitis; Antibiotic resistance; Corneal ulcer

Introduction

Microbial keratitis is a potentially eye-threatening infection characterized by a corneal epithelial defect and underlying stromal infiltrate. The clinical course of the infection depends upon both prompt initiation of effective therapy and the particular pathogen involved [1,2]. The classic treatment paradigm for microbial keratitis has been comprehensive evaluation of the eye including gram stain and culture of corneal scrapings followed by empiric treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics, usually two fortified preparations. Treatment can then be appropriately modified when the causative organism(s) are identified and the antibiotic sensitivities are determined [3].

The availability of highly effective topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolone therapy in the 1990’s has shifted the preferred treatment strategy by most ophthalmologists. Many ophthalmologists no longer culture corneal ulcers on presentation and begin fluoroquinolone monotherapy even when fortified antibiotics are available through local compounding pharmacies [4,5]. Many studies support the therapeutic equivalence or superiority of fluoroquinolone therapy to fortified antibiotics, which can reduce bacterial load by 99.9% within 24 hours [6-9].

While the clinical utility of gram stain and cultures has been limited primarily to the identification of the organism rather than antibiotic sensitivity [10], the emergence of antibiotic resistant microbial pathogens remains a grave clinical concern [11]. Fluoroquinolone resistance has been associated with delayed treatment response [12]. Moxifloxacin and vancomycin have been shown to have equivalent in vitro efficacy against methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) resistant to ciprofloxacin, but corneal pathogens are now known to harbor moxifloxacin resistance [13].

Periodic surveillance of local treatment and resistance patterns is vital for combating antibiotic resistance and improving patient visual outcomes [1,2,14,15]. We previously reviewed the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiologic spectrum, and outcomes of microbial keratitis at an urban public hospital in North Texas over the 5-year period January 2000-December 2004 [16]. This study reviews current microbial keratitis treatment and provides an update one decade later on the microbiology of infectious keratitis and visual outcomes at that same hospital.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Medical records of patients treated at Parkland Health and Hospital Systems in the 5- year period between September 2009 and August 2014 with ICD-9 codes for corneal ulcers (370.00, 370.01, 370.02, 370.03, 370.04, 370.05, 370.06, 370.0) were identified and the patients’ clinical history, past medical history, and ophthalmic medical notes were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination and were diagnosed and treated for microbial keratitis. Patients were excluded from the study if they were at any time known or thought to have had a viral or noninfectious keratitis. Data transformations and statistical analyses using Pearson’s correlation coefficient were performed in SAS Enterprise Guide 6.1 (Cary, NC).

Best-corrected visual acuity, spectacle, contact lens, or pinhole, was recorded at both presentation and resolution of the keratitis. Average BCVA was determined by first converting the visual acuity to log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) then taking the average of the logMAR values. Counting fingers vision was converted to snellen equivalent by assuming fingers are the size of a 200 letter. Hand motions vision was considered 10 times worse than count fingers [17]. The patient’s keratitis was considered resolved following urgent penetrating keratoplasty, enucleation, or evisceration, and the vision was not used for calculating average BCVA. Light perception or worse vision was recorded but excluded from average BCVA calculations.

Corneal cultures were performed as previously described [16]. Briefly, calcium alginate swabs were used to directly inoculate specimens onto chocolate agar, blood agar, thioglycollate broth, and Sabouraud’s dextrose agar. Confocal microscopy was performed when Acanthamoeba was suspected. in vitro antibiotic susceptibility was performed using the Dade Behring MicroScan system (Deerfield, IL) and interpreted by the serum standards set forth by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. This information was obtained from the hospital electronic medical record system.

Results

Demographics and risk factors: 2009-2014

Three hundred eighteen patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. One hundred ninety patients were male and 128 patients were female. The average age was 42.9 years of age (range, 14-95 years). Two hundred thirty-two patients (73%) underwent corneal cultures and 153 (66%) cultures had positive culture results. One hundred thirty patients (41%) had a history of contact lens wear, 88 patients (28%) had a pre-existing history of ocular surface disease, 55 patients (17%) had preceding ocular trauma, and 13 patients (4%) were on topical steroids in association with development of their corneal infection. One hundred twenty-six (40%) of patients were hospitalized for inpatient treatment. Compared to the prior study, these results demonstrated a lower culture rate but a greater proportion of cultures were positive for causative microorganisms. Contact lens wear was a much greater risk factor for corneal ulcer in this cohort while ocular surface disease was a lesser factor. Fewer patients were hospitalized for their corneal infection (Figure 1).

clinical-experimental-ophthalmology-risk-factors

Figure 1: Demographics and risk factors for microbial keratitis. Comparison of 5-year periods, 2000-2004 (n=122), and 2009-2014 (n=318). (A) Culture rate and effective culture positivity rate, (B) risk factors for microbial keratitis, and (C) rate of hospitalization.

Microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility

Corneal culture and confocal microscopy identified 220 organisms. Of the organisms isolated, 46.4% were gram-positive bacteria, 38.6% were gram-negative bacteria, and 14.5% were fungal organisms. One case of Acanthamoeba was identified with confocal microscopy. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most common grampositive bacteria isolated, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common gram-negative bacteria isolated, and Fusariam was the most common fungal species isolated. Only 3 cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were isolated in culture (Table 1).

  No. % of Class % of Total
Gram-Positive Organisms      
Coagulase-negative staph 36 35.3% 16.4%
Non speciated 26 25.5% 11.8%
Staphylococcus epidermidis 9 8.8% 4.1%
Staphylococcus warneri 1 1.0% 0.5%
Alpha hemolytic streptococcus 23 22.5% 10.5%
Non-speciated 10 9.8% 4.5%
Streptococcus pneumoniae 13 12.7% 5.9%
Staphylococcus aureus 18 17.6% 8.2%
MSSA 15 14.7% 6.8%
MRSA 3 2.9% 1.4%
Group B Streptococcus 1 1.0% 0.5%
Bacillus species not cerus 5 4.9% 2.3%
Corynebacterium 4 3.9% 1.8%
Other gram-positve 15 14.7% 6.8%
Total gram positive 102 100.0% 46.4%
Gram-Negative Organisms      
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 35 41.2% 15.9%
Moraxella catarrhalis 8 9.4% 3.6%
Serratia marcescens 6 7.1% 2.7%
Klebsiella pneumoniae 5 5.9% 2.3%
Moraxella lacunata 5 5.9% 2.3%
Proteus mirabilis 3 3.5% 1.4%
Haemophilus influenzae 2 2.4% 0.9%
Neisseria gonorrhoea 1 1.2% 0.5%
Other gram-negative 20 23.5% 9.1%
Total gram negative 85 100.0% 38.6%
Fungal Organisms      
Fusariam species 9 28.1% 4.1%
Bipolaris species 8 25.0% 3.6%
Candida species 5 15.6% 2.3%
Aspergillus species 4 12.5% 1.8%
Other fungal 6 18.8% 2.7%
Total fungal 32 100.0% 14.5%
Parasitic Organisms      
Acanthamoeba 1 100.0% 0.5%
Total Organisms 220    

Table 1: Microbiological spectrum of microbial keratitis: 2009-2014. Corneal cultures of microbial keratitis at Parkland Health and Hospital Systems, 5-year period, 2009-2014. (MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; MSSA: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ).

Compared to the prior study, there were fewer gram-positive organisms, more gram-negative organisms, more fungal organisms, and much fewer Acanthamoeba (Figure 2). Pseudomonas infection was strongly associated with contact lens wear (p<0.01). Gram-positive bacterial infection was associated with ocular surface disease and steroid use (p<0.01 and p=0.01 respectively).

clinical-experimental-ophthalmology-microbiology-keratitis

Figure 2: Trends in microbiology of keratitis. Comparison of 5-year periods, 2000-2004 (n=122), and 2009-2014 (n=318), microbiology of microbial keratitis at Parkland Health and Hospital Systems.

Of the bacteria tested, 48.6% were considered to be resistant to erythromycin, 3.8% to ciprofloxacin, 2.3% to gentamicin, and 1.9% to tobramycin. None were considered to be resistant to cefazolin or vancomycin. Of the most common corneal pathogens, only one colony was considered to have resistance to gentamicin. No isolates of Pseudomonas were considered to have resistance to ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin. There was widespread resistance to erythromycin among the most common corneal pathogens (Table 2).

A
  Gentamicin Tobramycin
  Susceptible Total % Susceptible Total %
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus 15 15 100.0% 0 0 n/a
S. aureus 15 15 100.0% 0 0 n/a
MSSA 12 12 100.0% 0 0 n/a
MRSA 3 3 100.0% 0 0 n/a
P. aeruginosa 32 33 97.0% 33 33 100.0%
Resistant Cases 1 case E. coli 1 case E. coli
  1 case P. aeruginosa  
B
  Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin
  Susceptible Total % Susceptible Total %
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus 0 0 n/a 0 0 n/a
S. aureus 0 0 n/a 0 0 n/a
MSSA 0 0 n/a 0 0 n/a
MRSA 0 0 n/a 0 0 n/a
P. aeruginosa 33 33 100.0% 2 2 100.0%
Resistant Cases 1 case E. coli 1 case nocardia abscessus  
C
  Erythromycin Cefazolin
  Susceptible Total % Susceptible Total %
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus 9 19 47.4% 9 9 100.0%
S. aureus 10 17 58.8% 14 14 100.0%
MSSA 10 14 71.4% 14 14 100.0%
MRSA 0 3 0.0% 0 0 n/a
P. aeruginosa 0 0 n/a 0 0 n/a

Table 2: Antibiotic susceptibility of most common corneal pathogens: 2009-2014. Antibiotic susceptibilities of the most common corneal pathogens against commonly available ophthalmic antibiotics. (A) Aminoglycoside antibiotics, (B) Fluoroquinolone antibiotics, (C) Macrolide and cephalosporin antibiotics.

Treatment

One hundred thirty-seven patients received fluoroquinolone monotherapy as the initial therapy for their keratitis (43%); and one hundred fifty-three patients received a combination of fortified vancomycin and gentamicin as initial therapy (48%). Nineteen patients were begun on initial antifungal agents on presentation (6%). One patient was initially treated with polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB).

Treatment with fortified antibiotics or prolonged antifungal therapy was associated with inpatient treatment (p<0.01 and p=0.01 respectively) while treatment with fluoroquinolone monotherapy was associated with outpatient treatment (p<0.01). Combination fortified antibacterial therapy was associated with Pseudomonas infection (p<0.01). Initial treatment with an antifungal antibiotic was associated with fungal culture positivity (p<0.01) and negatively associated with bacterial culture positivity (p<0.01).

Outcomes

In the 2009-2014 cohort, BCVA was logMAR 1.43 (20/542) at presentation and logMAR 0.61 (20/82) at resolution of the keratitis. At presentation, 34 patients had light perception or worse vision (10.7%) and at resolution, 26 patients had that vision (8.2%). Twenty-four patients developed corneal perforation (7.5%). One patient died from causes unrelated to their corneal infection. Nineteen patients underwent urgent keratoplasty (6.0%) and 11 patients underwent enucleation or evisceration (3.5%). Fungal and gram-positive bacterial infections, especially with S. aureus , were at increased risk for corneal perforation. Fungal infections were at greater risk for urgent keratoplasty than bacterial infections. Gram-positive bacterial infections were at greater risk for urgent enucleation and evisceration than gram-negative bacteria (Table 3).

  Odds Ratio Confidence Interval (95%)
N=318   Lower Upper
Risk Factors      
Steroid Use 2.34 0.49 11.24
Trauma 1.84 0.73 4.66
Ocular Surface Disease 1.02 0.39 2.66
Contact Lens Wear 0.18 0.05 0.62
Causative Organism      
Fungal 3.16 1.18 8.48
S. aureus 2.80 1.09 7.15
Gram (+) 2.43 1.06 5.59
Bacterial 1.91 0.89 4.11
 P. aeruginosa 0.71 0.16 3.16

Table 3A: Risk for corneal perforation.

  Keratoplasty Enucleation/Evisceration
  Odds Ratio Confidence Interval (95%) Odds Ratio Confidence Interval (95%)
N = 318   Lower Upper   Lower Upper
Risk Factors            
Steroid Use 2.94 0.60 14.34 -- -- --
Ocular Surface Disease 1.87 0.71 4.92 1.79 0.51 6.29
Trauma 1.14 0.37 3.58 0.94 0.20 4.48
Contact Lens Wear 0.48 0.17 1.37 -- -- --
Causative Organism            
Fungal 3.82 1.30 11.26 0.75 0.10 5.87
P. aeruginosa 1.88 0.51 6.88 0.59 0.07 4.61
S. aureus 1.42 0.39 5.14 3.53 1.14 10.86
Bacterial 1.20 0.50 2.85 4.54 1.27 16.22
Gram (+) 1.07 0.37 3.14 3.52 1.24 10.02

Table 3: Risks for complications and interventions: 2009-2014. Analysis of risk factors and causative organisms for (A) Corneal perforation and (B) Acute surgical intervention.

Compared to the prior decade, best-corrected visual acuity on presentation was similar while vision on resolution of the infection was significantly better. The proportion of patients with light perception or worse vision on both presentation and resolution were lower. The corneal perforation rate and rates for both urgent keratoplasty and enucleation or evisceration were lower compared to the prior decade (Figure 3).

clinical-experimental-ophthalmology-light-perception

Figure 3: Outcomes of microbial keratitis. Comparison of 5-year periods, 2000-2004 (n=122), and 2009-2014 (n=318). (A) Average best corrected visual acuity, (B) Proportion of patients with light perception or worse vision, (C) Corneal perforation rate, (D) Rate of acute surgical intervention.

Discussion

Demographics and risk factors

Compared to the prior decade, substantially fewer patients underwent corneal cultures on initial outpatient presentation. Whereas in the past patients were routinely cultured except in cases of a small or non-vision-threatening infiltrate, currently cultures are often reserved for severe infections, particularly in the community [5]. At our institution, this treatment strategy has resulted in a higher positive culture rate. Of note, similar proportions of the total patients at each study period had a positive corneal culture suggesting the lower risk patients were less likely to have a positive corneal culture.

Ocular surface disease was the most common risk factor for microbial keratitis in the prior decade while contact lens wear is now more common [18]. Not surprisingly, our rates are now more similar to those reported more recently by others [19]. There are now more than 40 million contact lens wearers in the United States and contact lens wear is reported to be the single largest risk factor for microbial keratitis [20,21].

Microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility

Over the 10-year period, we found an increase in coagulasenegative Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas and a decrease in Staphylococcus aureus , both methicillin sensitive and resistant variants. This pattern has also been found in other studies in the literature [14]. At our institution, we believe this to be due to a greater proportion of patients presenting with history of contact lens wear due to increasing numbers of lens wearers. Despite the increasing alarm over MRSA, there were only 3 cases of MRSA at our institution as compared to 5 cases during the same interval a decade prior; and there has been only 1 confirmed case of Acanthamoeba over the past 5 years. While some studies have found low resistance of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus to fluoroquinolones [19], resistance at our institution became so widespread in the past that we no longer routinely test for fluoroquinolone susceptibility. These findings have also been reported by others in the literature [14,22].

While epidemiologically useful, large studies have not shown a relation between antibiotic resistance and clinical outcomes [23,24]. This is not surprising as ophthalmic antibiotic preparations are applied topically at concentrations as high as three orders of magnitude greater than typical minimum inhibitory concentrations with resulting high corneal concentrations.

Treatment

With concern, routine practice at our institution has also been shifting towards careful monitoring, more selective culturing of patients presenting with microbial keratitis, and initial outpatient therapy with a fourth generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic with close follow-up. This strategy is limited by patient-specific factors in our practice setting but nevertheless, when selectively applied, has not resulted in worsening clinical outcomes. Not surprisingly, we found a negative correlation between fluoroquinolone monotherapy and hospitalization and a positive correlation between fortified antibacterial therapy and hospitalization.

Outcomes

The average BCVA on presentation did not appear to be significantly different over the 10-year period but the average BCVA at resolution was significantly improved in the latter period compared to the prior period. At the same time, the proportion of patients with light perception or worse vision was lower at presentation suggesting earlier presentation for treatment in the latter population. The proportion of patients with corneal perforation and those requiring urgent keratoplasty or enucleation or evisceration was also lower in the contemporary period.

Conclusion

Microbial keratitis remains a challenging infection to treat in the urban public hospital patient population despite the availability of highly effective ophthalmic antibiotics. Outpatient compliance is often poor due to a myriad of reasons including poor social support, unstable living situations, medication costs, and inconsistent followup. Over the past 10 years, we have found an increasing trend towards a greater proportion of patients with keratitis associated with contact lens wear and with it, a higher proportion of patients with Pseudomonas -associated keratitis. Despite widespread clinical concern, increasing numbers of resistant organisms has not been observed at our institution. The MRSA rate and Acanthamoeba rate are unchanged. Treatment patterns have liberalized with less hospitalization and more selective use of corneal cultures. As a result, visual outcomes have not worsened overall but have actually improved.

Acknowledgement

David Seamont and Adam Harris for their assistance with data collection.

Funding

Supported in part by EY020799 and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, NY.

References

  1. Lichtinger A, Yeung SN, Kim P, Amiran MD, Iovieno A, et al. (2012) Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in Toronto: an 11-year review. Ophthalmology 119: 1785-1790.
  2. Sharma S, Garg P, Rao G, Gopinathan U (2009) Review of epidemiological features, microbiological diagnosis and treatment outcome of microbial keratitis: Experience of over a decade. Indian J Ophthalmol 57: 273.
  3. Jones DB (1973) Early diagnosis and therapy of bacterial corneal ulcers. Int Ophthalmol Clin 13: 1-29.
  4. Hsu HY, Nacke R, Song JC, Yoo SH, Alfonso EC, et al. (2010) Community opinions in the management of corneal ulcers and ophthalmic antibiotics: a survey of 4 states. Eye Contact Lens 36: 195-200.
  5. McLeod SD, DeBacker CM, Viana MA (1996) Differential care of corneal ulcers in the community based on apparent severity. Ophthalmology 103: 479-484.
  6. Mather R, Karenchak LM, Romanowski EG, Kowalski RP (2002) Fourth generation fluoroquinolones: new weapons in the arsenal of ophthalmic antibiotics. Am J Ophthalmol 133: 463-466.
  7. The Ofloxacin Study Group (1997) Ofloxacin Monotherapy for the Primary Treatment of Microbial Keratitis. Ophthalmology 104: 1902-1909.
  8. Kowalski RP, Karenchak LM, Gordon YJ (1998) Comparison of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin using human corneal susceptibility levels. See comment in PubMed Commons below Cornea 17: 282-287.
  9. Miller D, Chang J, Flynn H, Alfonso E (2013) Comparative In Vitro Susceptibility of Besifloxacin and Seven Comparators Against Ciprofloxacin- and Methicillin-Susceptible/Nonsusceptible Staphylococci. Journal Of Ocular Pharmacology And Therapeutics, 29: 339-344.
  10. Kowal VO, Levey SB, Laibson PR, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ (1997) Use of routine antibiotic sensitivity testing for the management of corneal ulcers. Arch Ophthalmol 115: 462-465.
  11. Alexandrakis G, Alfonso EC, Miller D (2000) Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in south Florida and emerging resistance to fluoroquinolones. Ophthalmology 107: 1497-1502.
  12. Wilhelmus KR, Abshire RL, Schlech BA (2003) Influence of fluoroquinolone susceptibility on the therapeutic response of fluoroquinolone-treated bacterial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 121: 1229-1233.
  13. Aliprandis E, Ciralsky J, Lai H, Herling I, Katz H (2005) Comparative Efficacy of Topical Moxifloxacin Versus Ciprofloxacin and Vancomycin in the Treatment of P. aeruginosa and Ciprofloxacin-Resistant MRSA Keratitis in Rabbits. Cornea 24: 201-205.
  14. Orlans H, Hornby S, Bowler I (2011) In vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial keratitis isolates in Oxford, UK: a 10-year review. Eye 25: 489-493.
  15. Pandita A, Murphy C (2011) Microbial keratitis in Waikato, New Zealand. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 39: 393-397.
  16. Pachigolla G, Blomquist P, Cavanagh H (2007) Microbial Keratitis Pathogens and Antibiotic Susceptibilities: A 5-Year Review of Cases at an Urban County Hospital in North Texas. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice 33: 45-49.
  17. Holladay JT(1997) Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg 13: 388-391.
  18. Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F (2008) Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis. Cornea 27: 22-27.
  19. Sand D, She R, Shulman IA, Chen DS, Schur M, et al. (2015) Microbial keratitis in los angeles: the doheny eye institute and the los angeles county hospital experience. Ophthalmology 122: 918-924.
  20. Cope JR, Collier SA, Rao MM, Chalmers R, Mitchell GL, et al. (2015) Contact Lens Wearer Demographics and Risk Behaviors for Contact Lens-Related Eye Infections--United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64: 865-870.
  21. Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D (1991) Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet 338: 650-653.
  22. Elsahn A, Yildiz E, Jungkind D, Abdalla Y, Erdurmus M, et al. (2010) In Vitro Susceptibility Patterns of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Corneal Isolates to Antibiotics. Cornea 29: 1131-1135.
  23. Coster DJ, Badenoch PR (1987) Host, microbial, and pharmacological factors affecting the outcome of suppurative keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 71: 96-101.
  24. Kim RY, Cooper KL, Kelly LD (1996) Predictive factors for response to medical therapy in bacterial ulcerative keratitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234: 731-738.
Citation: Truong DT, Bui MT, Memon P, Cavanagh HD (2015) Microbial Keratitis at an Urban Public Hospital: A 10-Year Update. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 6:498.

Copyright: © 2015 Truong DT, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top