Growth, Fruit Yield and Disease Index of Carica papaya L. Inocula
Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research

Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2593-9173

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2014) Volume 5, Issue 2

Growth, Fruit Yield and Disease Index of Carica papaya L. Inoculated with Pseudomonas straita and Inorganic Fertilizers

Chandra KK*
Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Environmental Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh, India
*Corresponding Author: Chandra KK, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Environmental Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh, India, Tel: 919479067324 Email:


Experiment was conducted to study the effects of Pseudomonas straita and chemical fertilizers on growth, fruit yield and leaf mosaic virus in Carica papaya var. Sinta F1. The experiment comprised four treatments namely Farmers practices (T0- NP (Nitrogen: Phophorus) 100:50+10 kg FYM (Farm Yard Manure)/plant/year), Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria (T1- Pseudomonas straita @20 g culture /plant/year), Recommended fertilizer dose (T2- NPK 300:300:300+FYM 10 kg/plant/year), T3- Pseudomonas straita + NPK (300:300:300NPK+FYM 10 kg + P. straita 20 g /plant/year) in seven replications. The planting density was 2500 ha-1 (2 m × 2 m). The treatment effects found significant (p<0.05) for plant height, leaf number, leaf length, fruit weight, fruit volume and fruit yield while, nonsignificant for trunk girth, inter nodal length and pulp thickness. The treatment T3 plants occurred growth and fruit yield maximum followed with T2. Pseudomonas straita (T1) alone gave poorest result but its combination with NPK (T3) rendered highest number of fruit (48 fruit /plant) with an average weight of 675 g. The plant with T2 showed 18.18% higher leaves, 36.84% higher fruit weight and 41.03% higher yield compared to T0. Trends of Plant Disease Index (PDI) was declining by 50.36% with T1 followed with T3 (27.88%) and T2 (13.40%) compared T0. The treatment effects were positively correlated with plant height (r2=0.78), leaf number (r2=0.81), fruit yield (r2=0.97) and recorded negative for PDI (Plant Disease Index) (r2=0.30).


Keywords: Carica papaya; Pseudomonas straita; Percent disease index; Fruit yield


Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is widespread throughout India and in globe considered as one of the most important, economic and nutritious fruit crop with rich antioxidants, carotene, vitamins, and flavonoids. Due to its easy growing and early fruiting ability it occupied significant positions in homestead, kitchen garden, home back space for family use and commercial production. Papaya is reported in more than 60 countries with 11.22 million metric ton yield (FAOSTAT, 2012) dominated in Asia (52.2%), South America (23.8%), Africa (13.2%), Central America and the Caribbean region (10.9%). It is successfully grown in wide range of soils but best in slightly acidic and sandy loam soils [1].

Presently the papaya production is dependent upon inorganic fertilizers, High Yielding Variety(HYV) and plant protection chemicals. The fertilizer requirements in papaya have been studied throughout the World for many years [2] and have reported variations in plant growth and yields due to varying rate of fertilizer doses [3]. Moreover, it is also observed that the long-term applications of inorganic fertilizers not only decrease the crop productivity [4] but also make the plants susceptible to insects and diseases, besides deterioration of fruit minerals and quality. Now, judicious use of organic manures, inorganic and microbial fertilizers is rapidly gaining favor in fruit and vegetable crops [5,6].

It observed that in high yielding papaya varieties, during reproductive stage, the high demand for P exceeds the capacity of the root system [7]. Naturally the plant interacts with many microorganisms to fulfill the requirements of nutrients and water but apparent result is not seen because of the presence of low and ineffective microorganism in soil [8]. Thus it is imperative to use the potential soil microorganisms in production system by selecting their best combinations. It becomes thus possible to encourage healthy cultural systems without depending totally on chemical fertilizers to sustain a better productivity and ecosystem conservation [9]. Pseudomonas is one of the beneficial soil microorganism solubilize fixed P into an available form which are easily absorb by plant. Currently considerable information is available on phosphorus solubilizing bacteria indicating enhanced mineral nutrition in many agricultural crops grown on wide soil types [8,10,11]. Many studies are reported on the positive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungion papaya [12,13], but the information is limited on phosphorus solubilizing microorganism. Therefore in the present study effects of Pseudomonas straita was examined singly and in combinations with recommended dose of chemical fertilizers for India with respect to growth, fruit yield and leaf mosaic virus incidence in papaya under field condition.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in the Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Environmental Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh, India) lies within latitude 21°47' to 23°8' and longitude 81°14' to 83°15' (Figure 1). Seeds of Carica papaya variety- Sinta F1, gynodioecious high yielding (50-60 kg/plant) was procured from commercial source, Varanasi (India) and sown in plastic root trainers on 15th August, 2012, transplanted after 15 days of germination into polyethylene bag of size 23 × 12.5 cm filled with autoclaved nursery soil: sand (1:1 v/v) and kept in glass house. Final transplanting of seedling was done in field on dated 30 October, 2012 in 30 cm3 size pits at spacing of 2 m × 2 m, when plants attained 30 cm height.


Figure 1: Experimental view of Papaya

RBD (Randomized Block Design) experiment comprised four treatments Farmers practices (T0- NP (Nitrogen:Phosphorus)100:50+10 kg FYM/plant/year), Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria(T1- Pseudomonas straita @20 g culture /plant/year), Recommended fertilizer dose (T2- NPK (Nitrogen : Phosphorus : Potassium) 300:300:300 g+FYM (Farm Yard Manure) 10 kg/plant/year), T3- Pseudomonas straita + NPK (300:300:300 g NPK+FYM 10 kg + P. straita 20 g /plant/year) in seven replications. Application doses were determined based on the recommendations by Agriculture University for papaya and personnel communication from the papaya growing farmers. Half dose of NPK and full quantity of FYM were given to plants at the time of transplanting while remaining fertilizers were applied in 3 equal splits after 45 days (December, 2012), 100 days (March, 2013) and 150 days (August, 2013) of planting. Pseudomonas straita culture (Inoculum load 2.17 × 106) was obtained from College of Agriculture (Indira Gandhi Agriculture University), Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) was placed @ 20 g/plant in a depth of 10 cm near root zone at the time of transplanting into field. Most Papaya growers apply hardly 100g nitrogen and 50 g phosphorus per year at various times in eastern Chhattisgarh which was kept as such in T0. Multiplex (micronutrient) 3 mL/L was sprayed after 55 days and 125 days of transplanting and Chlorpyriphos 1 mL/L and Carbendazim 2 g/L water was given through foliar spray on 15th November, 2012. Emidachlorprid 0.2 mL and Copper Oxychloride 3 g/L of water was also sprayed during February, 2013 to control aphids and leaf diseases of papaya.

Stem diameter, height and leaf disease index were measured and flowering and fruiting behavior of each plants were observed at regular intervals. Finally, the experiment was terminated after 365 days of field planting and data were recorded analyzed statistically using SPSS software. Percent Disease Index(PDI) was worked out after examining the leaves infected by LCMV (Leaf Curl Mosaic Virus) and YLMV (Yellow Leaf Mosaic Virus) under Windias instrument and determined as per Wheeler (1969) by following formula:


Where PDI=Percent Disease Index, X=Sum of all numerical rating, N=number of leave observed and H=Highest rating of the disease. Analysis of experimental data was subjected using SPSS software for the critical difference and correlation studies.

Results and Discussion

Treatment effect on plant growth parameters

The distinct treatment effects on the plant growth of papaya are depicted in Table 1. There was a highly significant effect on plant height varied within treatment (CD 0.22) at p<0.05. The plant height increased polynomial and T3 (Recommended NPK +P. straita) gave best results as height increase of 16.54% while the trunk girth was not influenced by any treatment (p<0.05). T1 (P. straita) treated plant exhibited lowest growth and reported 17.29% and 20.00% less height and girth respectively compared with T0.

Treatments Plant Height (m) Trunk Girth (cm) Number of  Leave Leaf Length (cm) Leaf Width (cm) Inter-nodal Length (cm)
T0 2.66 40.00 22 52 45 3.70
T1 2.20 32.50 16 33 35 3.30
T2 2.80 43.00 26 58 44 3.70
T3 3.10 48.44 31 65 68 3.90
CD (P <0.05) 0.22 NS 2.33 3.40 4.65 NS*

Table 1: FYM, NPK and Pseudomonas straita effects on plant growth parameters of Carica papaya. CD - Critical differences, NS - Not Significant

Number of leaves, leaf length and leaf width were also increased due to the bipartite application of NPK and P. straita (T3). There was 40.90% more foliage in T3 followed by T2 (18.18%) than T0 (22 leaves /plant). Similarly leaf length and leaf width was improved by 25.00% and 51.11% respectively in T3 plants than T0. Application of P. straita alone could not show significant results in papaya. The treatment effect was recorded positive on plant height (r2=0.78) and leaf number (r2=0.81) Figure 2. The increase in plant height, leaf number and leaf width was due to the NPK and P. straita by which the plant could able to absorb nutrients in a higher rate and in a better way as also reported by Raman. Previous papaya studies also suggested that N rate had no effect on stem diameter (Davies et al.).


Figure 2: The effect of treatments on plant growth, number of leave, fruit volume, fruit yield respectively of Carica papaya. Results are expressed as means by treatment (n=10).

Treatment effect on fruits and yield

The fruit weight and fruit yield were observed significantly difference (p<0.05) within treatment (Table 2; Figures 2 and 3). Observations revealed that the maximum 48 fruit was recorded with T3 which was about 45% high compared to T0. Similarly, fruit weight was also recorded high in the same treatment (45.26%) followed by T2 (36.84%). The increase in fruit weight was due to increase in growth and fruit volume (r2=0.96) (Figure 1). The performance of T1 (P. straita) was unsatisfactory as compared to T0 (Control plant) due to poor growth and smaller fruit size respectively.

Treatments Number of Fruit Maximum Weight (kg) Average Fruit Weight (g) Fruit Length (cm) Fruit Width (cm) Fruit Volume (cm3) Pulp Thickness (cm) Fruit Yield (kg/ plant)
T0 33 2.00 475 15 12 180 2.20 15.67
T1 29 1.30 430 13 9 117 1.50 12.47
T2 34 2.50 650 17 11 187 2.40 22.10
T3 48 2.90 690 19 15 285 2.60 33.12
CD(P<0.05) 2.50 0.20 7.51 1.90 1.10 26.33 NS 3.15

Table 2: Fruiting parameters of Carica papaya applied with different doses of chemical fertilizers and Pseudomonas straita . CD - Critical differences, NS - Not Significant


Figure 3: It indicates the effect of treatments on Yield, Disease Index (DI) percent and correlation of treatments on DI respectively. Results are expressed as means by treatment (n=10).

The fruit yield per plant varied statistically (CD 3.15, P<0.05) within treatments. In contrast, there was a highly significant polynomial increase in fruit yield (r2=0.97) (Figure 2) when recommended dose of NPK and P. straita was applied. The maximum fruit yield occurred at an application of NPK with P. straita (T3) doubled the fruit yield followed by T2 (41.03%) compared to T0 (15.67 kg/plant). This was an agreement with the increase in number of fruit and fruit volume due to better plant growth in the presence of chemical and bio-fertilizer (T3) as also reported by other workers (Yadav et al., Dalal et al.,) [14,15]. Yield was considerably lower for papaya plants growing with T1 (Table 2 and Figure 3). In the present study, the effect of treatment on pulp thickness was not significant at p<0.05 however it noticed thickest in T3 than other treatments due to bigger fruit volume. Due to higher number of fruit and greater size the overall yield of papaya was increased of 74.52 t/ha with T3 compared T0 (35.25 t/ha) (Figures 3 and 5).


Figure 4: LCMV and YMLV of Papaya


Figure 5: Pulp thickness of papaya in T3 and T0 treatments

Treatment Effect on Percent Disease Index (PDI)

The examination results of LCMV and YLMV in papaya experiment are shown in Figures 3 and 4. PDI varied significantly within the treatments (CD 2.57, P<0.05). Interestingly, in the presence of P. straita the disease index was decreased by 50.0% followed by T3 (27.88%) and T2 (13.40%) compared T0. It indicates that the application of NPK + P. straita (Figure 3) reduces the incidence of LCMV and YLMV (r2=0.30) by way of maintaining higher nutrients availability in soil results in a better plant growth and fruiting as also reported by Bueno-Jaquez et al. [16] and Kumar et al. [2].


In the present study, NPK (300:300:300 g) + FYM (10 kg) and Pseudomonas straita (20 g/ plant) increased fruit yield is a function of increases in plant height, leaf number, fruit number and fruit volume. In contrast, fruit weight and fruit number reached maxima at T3 results 100% increment in yield. Trends for both fruit volume (r2=0.96) and fruit yield (r2=0.97) with the treatment effects were highly correlated. PDI (Plant Disease Index) also reduced significantly with the inclusion of P. straita used with NPK compared to control plant however; application of P. straita only did not perform satisfactorily. Therefore, tripartite application of FYM, NPK and P. straita appears to have more effective than only NPK and P. straita. This practice will decrease in production costs and increasing yield with reduction of diseases in papaya by maintaining healthy plant growth.


  1. Nakasone HY, Paull RE (1998) Tropical fruits. CAB Intl., Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
  2. Kumar N, Soorianathasundaram K, Meenakshi N, Manivannan MI, Suresh J. et al. (2010) Balanced fertilization in papaya (Carica papaya L.) for higher yield and quality. ActaHort 851:357–362.
  3. Davies FS, Crane JH, Schaffer B, Miglioccio K, Zalman G (2011) Fertilizer rates, application timing, growth and yields of Papaya plants in North Central Florida. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc124:23-27.
  4. Chand S, Anwar M, Patra DD (2006) Influence of long-term application of organic and inorganic fertilizer to build up soil fertility and nutrient uptake in mint-mustard cropping sequence. Commu. Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37:63-76.
  5. Anwar M, Patra DD, Chand S, Alpesh K, Naqvi AA et al. (2005) Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth, herb and oil yield, nutrient accumulation, and oil quality of French basil. Commu. Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36: 1737-1746.
  6. Chandra KK, Pandey SK, Singh AK (2012). Influence of tree rejuvenation, IPNM and VA-Mycorrhizal fungi on shoot emergence, yield and fruit quality of Psidiumguajava under farmers field condition. International Journal of Biosciences 2: 9-17.
  7. Dunne MJ, Fitter AH (1989) The phosphorous budget of a field-grown strawberry (F.fragaria x Ananassa cv. Hapil) crop: evidence for a mycorrhizal contribution. Association of Applied Biologist 114:185-193.
  8. Miransari M (2011) Interactions between AMF and soil bacteria. Applied Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 89: 917-930.
  9. Pandey SK, Chandra KK. (2013) Impact of integrated nutrient management on tomato yield under farmers field conditions. J EnvBiol34:1047-1051.
  10. Kourosh O., Mahdi Z. (2011) Effects of Pseudomonas, Azotobacter and AMF on lycopene, antioxidant activity and total soluble solid. Advances in Environmental Biology 5: 1290.
  11. Raman J (2012) Response of Azotobacter, Pseudomonas and Trichoderma on growth of apple seedlings. IPCBEF, 40th International Conference on biological and Life Sciences, Singapore 83-90.
  12. Sukhada M (1992) Effect of VAM inoculation on plant growth, nutrient level and root phosphatase activity in papaya (Carica papaya C.V. CoorgHoney Dew). Fertilizer Research 31: 263-267.
  13. Khade SW, Rodrigues BF (2009) Studies on effects of ArbuscularMycorrhizal (Am.) fungi on mineral nutrition of Carica papaya L. Not. Bot. Hort. AgrobotCluj 37: 183-186
  14. Yadav PK, Yadav AL, Yadav AS, Yadav HC (2011) Effect of integrated nutrient nourishment on vegetative growth and physic chemical attributes of Papaya. Plant Archieve 11: 327-329.
  15. Dalal LP, Nandkar PB, Bhadange, DG (2011) Effect of NPK, Macro, micro-nutrient and biofertilizers on seed yield of Brassica juncea L. Pusa bold. Asian Journal of Microbiology, biotech & Environmental Science 13: 551-555.
  16. Bueno-Jaquez JE, Alonsu-Lopez A, Volk-Haller V, Gallardo-Lopez F, Ojeda-Ramirez MM et al. (2005) Response of Papaya tree to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization in Luvisol. Terra 23: 409-415.
Citation: Chandra KK (2014) Growth, Fruit Yield and Disease Index of Carica papaya L. Inoculated with Pseudomonas straita and Inorganic Fertilizers. J Biofertil Biopestici 5:146.

Copyright: © 2013 Chandra KK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.