GET THE APP

Dynamic Action of Myofibroblasts in Skin and Bone Marrow Transpla
Journal of Bone Research

Journal of Bone Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2572-4916

+44 1478 350008

Review Article - (2014) Volume 2, Issue 2

Dynamic Action of Myofibroblasts in Skin and Bone Marrow Transplantation

Noritaka Oyama*
Matsuda General Hospital, Ohno, Fukui, Japan
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Noritaka Oyama, Department of Dermatology and Dermato-Allergology, Matsuda General Hopital, 1-13 Kaname-Cho, Ohno, Fukui 912-0026, Japan, Tel: +81-(0)779-66-3238, Fax: +81-(0)779-66-1655 Email:

Abstract

Skin is highly accessible and evaluable organ, which accelerate the understanding of novel medical innovation in association with organ transplantation, engineering, and wound healing, as well as the stage-specific adaptability of transplanted Bone Marrow (BM) cells. In skin transplantation biology, multi-stage/-angle damages occur in both grafted donor and perilesional host skin, and need to be repaired properly for the engraftment and later maintenance of the local homeostasis and characteristic skin architecture, such as stratified squamoid epithelium and dermal components. These local events are more unlikely to be regulated by the host immunity, because the donor (allogenic) skin engraftment mostly accomplishes onto the immunocompromised or immunosuppressive animals. Accumulating evidences have emerged the importance of alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA)-positive myofibroblasts, via stage- and cell type specific contribution of TGF-beta, PDGF, ET-1, CCN-2 signaling pathways and/or mastocyte-derived mediators (e.g. histamine and tryptase), for the functional reorganization of the grafted skin. Moreover, particular cell lineages from BM cells have been shown to harbor the differentiation capacity into multiple skin cell phenotypes, including epidermal keratinocytes, and dermal endothelial cells and pericytes, under
controlled by chemokines or cytokines, but the trans-differentiation into alpha-SMA+ myofibroblasts is possibly reversed by inactivation of MEK/ERK signal cascade. We review the recent update of the myofibroblast biology in association with the reconstitution of the engrafted skin, and also work on translating this attractive action into the application of BM transplantation medicine in genetic skin diseases.

<

Keywords: Myofibroblasts; Alpha-smooth muscle actin; Bone marrow transplantation; Skin graft; Genetic skin diseases; Mesenchymal stem cells

Introduction

Skin represents a substantial part of mammalian ectoderm, which is normally exposed by various exogenous stimuli, for example, UV irradiation, infection, temperature, moisture, and mechanical stimuli [1]. Because skin is highly accessible to any of diagnostic and treatment procedures, researches for skin transplantation, as well as skin engineering and wound healing, can accelerate the understanding of underlying pathophysiology for the novel medical innovation utilizing self-made or more feasible skin equivalents. Over a thousand gene mutant loci for inherited human disorders have been reported thus far [2], and approximately one third of these disorders exhibit the corresponding skin abnormalities, in which the gene targeting/molecular-based therapies have yet to be standardized practically. Skin transplantation strategy and its relevant technology may thus retain the potential benefit in such skin conditions.

Histologically, the predominant cell populations in mammalian skin comprise dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes. Both cells show different morphology and function, and are separated structurally by basement membrane. Ours and other studies have utilized two-/three-dimensional co-culture or complex “organotopic” culture systems, allowing to address the importance of paracrine interaction between fibroblasts and keratinocytes [3,4]. Upon these in vitro skin equivalent assays, little is known about how these two cell types are reorganized properly in the grafted skin. The site of the skin graft might eventually account for multi-stage (acute/chronic) and multi-focal damages of the donor and perilesional host skin, micro-hemorrhage/exudation, and later excess fibrosis in the dermis. The grafted skin therefore needs to be repaired and reconstituted through these inevitable events. More specifically, dermatologists have much interests to know how the biological architecture characteristic for the skin (e.g. stratified squamoid epithelia, dermis intermixed with extracellular matrices and dermal components, and their polarity) can be maintained after the skin transplantation. One may consider that the particular cell phenotypes play a central role in the orchestration of the skin reconstitution, and if so, under what particular circumstances for this process? The chain of these biological events is more unlikely to be regulated by cellular and humoral immunity in the host, because in vivo researches for human skin transplantation has accomplished the donor skin allograft onto the immune compromised animals, such as nude and athymic mice, or those treated with immunosuppressive agents or the particular T cell subset (CD4+CD25+Foxp3) [5,6]. Inversely, a somewhat study limitation may thus often enable us to access to the insight associated with the skin transplantation immunobiology.

For understanding the cell-specific action in the skin transplantation, evidences from BM transplantation study may in part bring the clue. Native BM cells comprise the substantial proportion of cell sources that play a pivotal role in tissue homeostasis, repair, and regeneration. These cell populations are originated from either hematopoietic or mesenchymal stem cells, and subpopulations that are capable of differentiating into multiple cell lineages [7,8]. A series of recent research progress have emerged that BM cells can provide not only fibroblastic cells, but also epithelial cells in the lung and intestinal epithelium, and skin [9]. Particularly in skin, a transplantation of sex (XY chromosome)-mismatched BM cells or intrinsically labeled BM cells has demonstrated that keratinocyte specific marker-positive BM cells appeared in the epidermis, hair follicles, and sebaceous glands [10-15]. Moreover, in patients who underwent BM transplantation, donor BM cells displaying wide-ranged keratinocyte markers (pan-keratin) were detectable in the epidermis and maintained for over 3 years after the transplantation [16]. These data series suggest that the trans-differentiated keratinocytes from BM cells not only aid the impairment of the residual epidermal function after transplantation, but also participate in the compensation of the epidermal circumstances at the affected skin sites. On this basis, the population of BM-derived keratinocytes is secured functionally and structurally as a baseline stable supply. However, it remains unclear: i) how the BM cells are recruited strictly into the grafted skin, and if once they failed this process, how it can be corrected properly, ii) how the recruited BM cells contribute functionally to the local skin regeneration, and more interestingly, iii) whether the newly established epithelial-mesenchymal interaction can maintain the local skin homeostasis analogous to the host skin. From a dermatological view point, this review focuses on these attractive points in association with the cell type-specific reorganization in the skin transplantation, particularly dynamic action of myofibloblasts, as well as the relevant molecular profiles. These advanced evidences may help to ask how we can establish and refine the better medical approaches for the persistent skin wound condition, particularly in genetic skin diseases.

Biological Action of Myofibroblasts in Skin and BM Transplantation

After skin transplantation, the grafted skin sites need to repair some inevitable minor trauma and inflammation, for example, occasional hemorrhage caused by microvascular damage, exudative stress (edema), later excess micro-fibrosis, or even focal necrotic changes, in order to adapt to the host skin circumstance. At the early stage of these minor tissue damages, the grafted donor skin and/or perilesional host skin can primarily drive the recruitment of the particular subset of fibroblastic cells, termed “myofibroblasts” that specifically express the intracellular structural protein α-SMA [17]. α-SMA is strictly expressed in cells of the smooth muscle lineage, promotes stronger force generation compared with other actin isoforms in fibroblastic cells, and thus plays a pivotal role in the cell migration and local tissue contractility [18]. Despite its convenience detectability and unique marker for myofibroblast phenotype [19], the most important defining feature of myofibroblasts is the de novo development of stress fibers and contractile force and, questions remain to be ascertained the potential significance of other candidates for the myofibroblastic markers, such as endosialin [20], P311 [21], integrin α11β1 [22], osteopontin [23], and periostin [24].

Myofibroblasts can migrate into the grafted skin, and subsequently produce collagens, fibronectin, and proteoglycans to reconstitute the local extracellular matrix (ECM) network in the dermis [25,26]. During this process, αSMA is reorganized into the complexes of stress fibers for biological connecting to the surrounding ECM molecules, and participates in the exert contraction and mechanical tension, as well as reconstitution of primary intra/intercellular skeleton, for the establishment of the functional remodeling/framing of connective tissue. In contrast, persistence and/or aberrant increase of the local myofibroblasts and its action may be responsible for fibrosclerotic skin diseases, such as systemic scleroderma, morphea (localized scleroderma), or hypertrophic scar [27]. Another in vitro observation with human embryonic stem (hES) cells utilizing a three-dimensional skin model has shown that hES cell-derived mesenchymal cells that constitutively express α-SMA can promote multi-layered epithelium and the resultant wound healing process, with increased production of hepatocyte growth factor HGF, an essential factor for skin development and repair [28,29]. This characteristic cell phenotype may also be analogous to myofibroblastic cell lineage, with possible implication of epidermal-mesenchymal cross talk in a HGF-dependent manner.

The local myofibroblasts – without regard to the cells that recruited eventually into the donor grafted skin or local residential cells – are considered to be originated from multiple cell sources in vivo. Current concept favors the presence of at least three distinct cell sources for skin myofibroblasts (Figure 1); i) BM-derived mesenchymal stem cells, ii) pericytes that composed of skin microvasculature, iii) resident fibroblasts in the donor grafted skin and/or the perilesional host skin when grafted the skin [17]. These three myofibroblast sources are selective and transformed appropriately in skin damage- andhealing stage-dependent manners [30,31]. On this basis, fibrosclerotic diseases may at least in part share the pathogenic imbalance in myofibroblast recruitment and clearance. However, there have been no convincing data for what percentage of the particular cell lineage-derived myofibroblasts is involved in the reconstitution of the skin engraftment. Also, little is known about whether any biological thresholds of the myofibroblast recruitment exist in this event. For this detection, combination of any other characteristic marker(s) may be needed.

archive-bone-marrow-research-myofibroblasts-originated-nominated

Figure 1: Scheme of myofibroblast differentiation in skin. The local myofibroblasts characteristic for α-SMA expression are originated from multiple cell sources in the skin, and nominated from at least 3 distinct cell sources; BM-derived mesenchymal stem cells, microvascular pericytes, resident fibroblasts in the donor skin graft and/or in the perilesional host skin (after the skin graft). Some molecules can organize the cell-type and tissue-specific differentiation into dermal myofibroblasts.

Molecular-dependent Differentiation and Reversal of Myofibroblasts

There have been extensive reviews on the signaling cascades for transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), endothelin (ET)-1, cysteine-rich protein 61/connective tissue growth factor/nephroblastoma overexpressed gene (CCN)-2, and several soluble mediators from mastocytes and the potential contribution of this pathway in the myofibtoblast biology [27,32,33] (Figures 1 and 2). Each of these supports a variety of biological action associated with trans-differentiation and reversal of myofibroblasts, and is most likely to make a complex interrelationship between myofibroblasts and local ECM molecules to promote the skin wound repair, remodeling, and reorganization after transplantation.

archive-bone-marrow-research-Trans-differentiation-BM-derived

Figure 2: Trans-differentiation of BM-derived MSCs into the multiple skin component cells. The particular subset(s) of allogenically transferred MSCs, a PDGFR+/c-kit-/Sca-1-lineage, can differentiate into the keratin marker positive-epidermal keratinocytes via a paracrine action of HMGB1. In another cascade, the trans-diferentiation activity of the MSCs into other skin components, such as vasculature (endothelial cells and pericytes), follicular epithelium, and dermal interstitial fibroblasts, albeit much lesser with monocytes, macrophages, and adipocytes, is accelerated by certain cytokines/chemokines, especially CCR7-SLC/CCL21 pathway. These BM-derived multiple cell lineages can be a potential source for supplying skin structural molecules, such as type VII collagen (COLVII) and type XVII collagen (BPAGII; BP180), both of which are essential anchoring molecules in the basement membrane zone (BMZ).

Five TGF-β isoforms, TGF-β1-5, exist in mammals and are generated initially as biologically latent precursors, enabling them to bind to a heteromeric receptor complex (a type I and II receptor complex) [34]. The former receptor phosphorylates Smad2 and 3, which subsequently binds to Smad4, and finally activates the transcription of the corresponding genes in fibroblasts. Activation of the TGF-β signaling increases the production of collagen I and ECM molecules [35,36], in parallel with CCN overexpression [37], finally causes α-SMA expression and α-SMA-dependent stress fiber formation in resident fibrocytes and naive fibroblasts [38-41].

There are 3 isoforms of endothelin, ET-1, -2 and -3 [42]. ET-1 is the major isoform in human and is produced by various cell types, including endothelial cells, BM cells, hematopoietic cells, cardiomyocytes, and fibroblasts. ET-1 is secreted as a 212-aminoacid precursor (prepro-ET-1) and enzymatically cleaved to a biologically active 21-aminoacid peptide, which can bind to the two distinct receptors (ET-A and ET-B). ET-1 induces – in cooperation with TGF-β pathway – myofibroblast formation and migration, and ECM contraction via binding to ET-A/-B receptors and the resultant activation of downstream signalling molecules, Akt/rac [42,43]. A clinical observation from the treatment with bosentan, an ET receptor antagonist, for patients with systemic sclerosis suggests the direct effects of ET in the peripheral circulatory systems and its surrounding connective tissue [44,45].

CCN2, a member of the CCN family of matricellular proteins, is induced by TGF-β and ET-1 system, vice versa, and is therefore considered an essential cofactor required for the particular subsets of TGF-β cascade, FAK/Akt/PIP3K [42,46]. CCN2 can activate the fibrotic phenotype of cells, and also support a variety of biological TGF-β action, such as type I collagen synthesis, α-SMA expression, and promotion of cell-ECM interaction [47,48].

PDGF family members include PDGF-AA, -AB, -BB, -CC and –DD, and bind with two different PDGF receptors α and β [49]. PDGF can enhance multiple cell types, including neutrophils, macrophages, fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, to proliferate and migrate them into the skin wound, and also stimulate the differentiation into myofibroblasts, thus contributing to the local skin remodeling and contracture [50]. Mice treated with imatinib mesylate, a PDGF receptor-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exhibited delayed skin wound healing with decreased levels of the local myofibroblast number, collagen type I expression [51], and non-canonical TGF-β signal network [52,53]. The dynamics of the multiple molecular interactions suggest the prominent biological action of PDGF in the stage-specific regeneration of skin. Also, a recent study has suggested the potential contribution of a subset of PDGF receptor α-positive BM cell population in the epidermal keratinocyte differentiation and reorganization in mice skin [30].

Mastocytes have pleiotropic action for fibroblast biology by secreting a variety of chemical mediators and cytokines. In cell co-culture and skin equivalent culture systems, for example, human mastocyte line HMC-1 cells can induce the expression of α-SMA [54]. This induction is mediated by a paracrine action of histamine and a serine protease tryptase, thereby contributing to the fibroblast-dependent skin contraction.

In contrast to the cell source-specific molecules for the trans-differentiation toward the myofibroblast phenotype, this cellular event may be reversible by downregulation of MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)1 and/or ERK1 and 2 pathways [55].

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Skin Transplantation

Differentiation into keratinocytes and its progenitor or stem cells

Accumulating evidence has gained the possibility that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can contribute to the skin wound repair and development. For example, infusion of genetically engineered green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing BM cells into mice utero results in accumulation of a certain subpopulation of GFP-positive cells in non-wounded skin dermis, particularly in highly association with hair follicles [56]. More precisely, in vivo transplantation of sex (XY chromosome)-mismatched human BM cells or GFP-expressing murine BM cells has demonstrated that at least by 4 weeks after the transplantation, keratinocyte marker-positive BM cells appeared in the epidermis, hair follicles, and sebaceous glands [10-15], sites that harbour skin stem cell niches [57] (Figure 2). Thereafter, the locally recruited BM cells into the grafted (damaged) skin in mice can be maintained at least 5 months [30]. Considering the short turnover time of mice skin (2-3 weeks), the long-residing BM-derived epithelial cells are most likely to contain subpopulation(s) of epithelial progenitor/stem cells. This characteristic cell population constitutively expresses PDGF receptor α, but neither c-kit nor Sca-1, and the differentiation activity is accelerated by a paracrine action of heparin-binding molecules from the skin graft, especially high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) [58] (Figure 2). HMGB1 is an evolutionarily well-conserved protein, and is produced constitutively in various types of cells, particularly damaged and injured cells. It acts a DNA binding core in assembly of nucleoprotein complexes for the maintenance of nucleosomal structure and regulation of the corresponding gene transcription [59]. Infection and injury converge on common inflammatory responses that are mediated by HMGB1 secreted from immunologically activated immune cells, including macrophages/monocytes or passively released from pathologically damaged cells. However, mice and human BM transplantation studies have revealed that BM-derived keratinocytes account for an extremely rare population in both wounded and non-wounded skin epidermis; e.g. almost undetectable levels or only less than 0.0003% of all keratinocytes in the mice epidermis [31] and 0.14% of those in human epidermis [15]. These poor cell numbers are in agreement with the preliminary observation of recent reports, and in parallel, they never aggregate in the epidermis but mostly present therein as a single cell [15,30]. Conceptionally, the relatively scarcity of such cells may therefore raise questions about their biological significance in the skin engraftment. Besides, the recruited BM cells can be a potential source for supplying skin structural molecules, such as type VII (COL7) and type XVII collagens (BP180), both of which are essential anchoring molecules in dermal-epidermal junction (Figure 2). Loss-of-function mutations of these genes causes subtypes of genetic skin fragility and scarring diseases, recessive dystrophic (RDEB, OMIM #226600) and junctional epidermolysis bullosa (non-Herlitz JEB, OMIM #226650), respectively [60,61].

Embryonic and postnatal transplantation of BM cells into mice lacking type VII or XVII collagens can successfully ameliorate the persisted skin wound and fragility by newly generation of the defected skin molecules [56]. Most convincing evidence from a clinical trial of allogeneic whole BM transplantation in a patient with RDEB has successfully shown that BM cells can repair the skin wound and restore the defected COL7 expression in the skin basement membrane zone [16]. Overall, these data suggest that minimally trans-differentiated BM cells are indeed sufficient for the generation of deficient skin protein(s) and restore the fragile skin condition in vivo.

Differentiation of BM cells into multiple skin cells

Along with a streamline for the functional epidermal differentiation of BM cells, a most recent investigation has explored that BM-derived MSCs intravenously injected can differentiate into multiple skin cell lineages, including epidermal keratinocytes, and dermal endothelial cells and pericytes, finally contributing to skin wound repair in mice, suggesting upregulation of angiogenic properties in the host skin [15] (Figure 2). This MSC phenotype harbors several chemokine receptors, especially CCR7, a receptor of SLC/CCL21 that enable MSCs to migrate into the local tissues [62,63]. Perilesional skin injection of SLC/CCL21, but not thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), can increase the baseline differentiation of MSCs into the wounded skin, resulting in the wound closure. In this study, the trans-differentiation activity of bulk MSCs into multiple skin cell phenotypes seems higher comparative with previous reports; ~0.14% of GFP-positive MSCs into epidermal keratinocytes, ~13.2% into endothelial cells and ~33.0% into pericytes in the dermis, albeit much lesser with monocyte/macrophage and adipocyte lineages [30]. Interestingly, the recruitment of BM-derived cells is significant in the grafted skin and long-standing damaged skin, being a similar condition to RDEB [56,64], whereas it is much lesser or almost negligible levels in most of transiently established skin wound healing models [30,31]. The proportion of the recruited and/or trans-differentiated BM cells seems considerably variable by the skin damage and its period. Another angle of evidence suggest that transplanted BM cells can attenuate the proliferation and differentiation of α-SMA+ myofibroblasts, as well as the aberrant constitution of the local extracellular matrices, via down-regulation of TGF-β and type I collagen [65]. This local reaction further enhances the expression of matrix-degrading zinc-dependent enzymes, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family members (MMP-2, -9 and -13), presumably contributing to the inhibition of skin fibrosis/scar formation [66].

Current Issues and Perspective

Despite the recent dramatic progress in the skin transplantation and wound healing studies, we face to some inconclusive debates that need to be addressed; how much of the trans-differentiation activity of BM-derived MSCs is indeed influenced by different characters in individuals, e.g. age, medical history and on-going treatments, and affected skin sites. Are there any biological thresholds to recruit MSCs or to induce α-SMA+ myofibroblasts for the proper skin engraftment and wound healing, if any, how can we analyze and standardize them? Which soluble molecules or combination of these (e.g. SLC/CCL21, HMGB1, and PDGF; Figure 2) – if add exogenously - are more efficient to ensure the favorable outcome of the stage-specific events in the transplantation? Particularly in the allogenic BM transfer, do these supplemental additives affect the baseline incidence of life-threatening complications, such as GvHD? These parameters should be estimated precisely and translated into the lack-of-functional protein genodermatoses and post-BM transplant complications.

Summary

Skin and BM transplantation researches have come to be saturated gradually by multi-angle evidence and interpretation from the relevant organ transplantation, and provide novel therapeutic implications. BM-derived cells with pluripotent differentiation capacity into multiple skin components, including myofibroblasts that have a potential capacity for trans-differentiation and reversal, may thus act as target cell(s) for the innovative molecular therapy for persisted skin wounds in genetic and autoimmune diseases.

References

  1. Farage MA, Miller KW, Elsner P, Maibach HI (2008) Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in skin ageing: a review. Int J Cosmetic Sci 30:87-95
  2. Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, McKusick VA (2005) Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledge base of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res D514-517
  3. Gurtner GC, Werner S, YannBarrandon Y, Longaker MT (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453: 314-321
  4. Inoue M, Ono I, Tateshita T, Kuroyanagi Y, Shioya N (1998) Effect of a collagen matrix containing epidermal growth factor on wound contraction. Wound Repair Regen 6: 213-222
  5. Geer DJ, Swartz DD, Andreadis ST (2004) In vivo model of wound healing based on transplanted tissue-engineered skin. Tissue Eng 10: 1006-1017
  6. Issa F, Hester J, Goto R, Nadig SN, Goodacre TE, et al. (2010) Ex vivo-expanded human regulatory T cells prevent the rejection of skin allografts in a humanized mouse model. Transplantation 90: 1321-1327
  7. Orkin SH, Zon LI. Hematopoiesis (2008) An evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 132: 631–644
  8. Prockop DJ (2009) Repair of tissues by adult stem/progenitor cells (MSCs): Controversies, myths, and changing paradigms. MolTher 17: 939–946
  9. Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, Henegariu O, Hwang S, et al. (2001) Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell 4: 369-377
  10. Körbling M, Katz RL, Khanna A, Ruifrok AC, Rondon G, et al. (2002) Hepatocytes and epithelial cells of donor origin in recipients of peripheral-blood stem cells. N Engl J Med 346: 738–746
  11. Badiavas EV, Falanga V (2003) Treatment of chronic wounds with bone marrow-derived cells. Arch Dermatol 139: 510–516
  12. Kataoka K, Medina RJ, Kageyama T, Miyazaki M, Yoshino T, et al. (2003) Participation of adult mouse bone marrow cells in econstitution of skin. Am J Pathol 163: 1227–1231
  13. Borue X, Lee S, Grove J, Herzog EL, Harris R, et al. (2004) Bone marrow-derived cells contribute to epithelial engraftment during wound healing. Am J Pathol 165: 1767–1772
  14. Inokuma D, Abe R, Fujita Y, Sasaki M, Shibaki A, et al. (2006) CTACK/CCL27 accelerates skin regeneration via accumulation of bone marrow-derived keratinocytes. Stem Cells 24: 2810–2816
  15. Sasaki M, Abe R, Fujita Y, Ando S, Inokuma D, et al. (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells are recruited into wounded skin and contribute to wound repair by transdifferentiation into multiple skin cell type. J Immunol 15: 2581-2587
  16. Wagner JE, Ishida-Yamamoto A, McGrath JA, Hordinsky M, Keene DR, et al. (2010) Bone marrow transplantation for recessive dystrophic epidermolysisbullosa. N Engl J Med 12: 629-639
  17. Leask A (2010) Towards an anti-fibrotic therapy for scleroderma: targeting myofibroblast differentiation and recruitment. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 3: 8-13
  18. Ronnov-Jessen L, Petersen OW(1996) A function for filamentous alpha-smooth muscle actin: retardation of motility in fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 134: 67-80
  19. Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Prunotto M, Desmoulière A, et al. (2012) Recent Developments in Myofibroblast Biology: Paradigms for Connective Tissue Remodeling. Am J Pathol 180: 1340-1355
  20. Christian S, Winkler R, Helfrich I, Boos AM, Besemfelder E, et al. (2008) Endosialin (Tem1) is a marker of tumor-associated myofibroblasts and tumor vessel-associated mural cells. Am J Pathol 172: 486-494
  21. Tan J, Peng X, Luo G, Ma B, Cao C, et al. (2010) Investigating the role of P311 in the hypertrophic scar. PLoS One 5: e9995
  22. Carracedo S, Lu N, Popova SN, Jonsson R, Eckes B, et al. (2010) The fibroblast integrin alpha11beta1 is induced in a mechanosensitive manner involving activin A and regulates myofibroblast differentiation. J BiolChem 285: 10434-10445
  23. Lenga Y, Koh A, Perera AS, McCulloch CA, Sodek J, et al. (2008) Osteopontin expression is required for myofibroblast differentiation. Circ Res 102: 319–327
  24. Vi L, Feng L, Zhu RD, Wu Y, Satish L, et al. (2009) Periostin differentially induces proliferation, contraction and apoptosis of primary Dupuytren's disease and adjacent palmar fascia cells. Exp Cell Res 315: 3574-3586
  25. Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Galli A, Bochaton-Piallat ML, et al. (2007) The myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins. Am J Pathol 170: 1807-1816
  26. Chen Y, Shi-Wen X, van Beek J, Kennedy L, McLeod M, et al. (2005) Matrix contraction by dermal fibroblasts requires transforming growth factor-beta/activin-linked kinase 5, heparan sulfate-containing proteoglycans, and MEK/ERK: insights into pathological
  27. Takehara K (2003) Hypothesis: pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 30: 755-759
  28. Chmielowiec J, Borowiak M, Morkel M, Stradal T, Munz B, et al. (2007) c-Met is essential for wound healing in the skin. J Cell Biol 177: 151-162
  29. Matsumoto K, Nakamura T (2007) Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) as a tissue organizer for organogenesis and regeneration. BiochemBiophys Res Commun 29: 639-644
  30. Tamai K, Yamazaki T, Chino T, Ishii M, Otsuru S, et al. (2011) PDGFRalpha-positive cells in bone marrow are mobilized by high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) to regenerate injured epithelia. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 108: 6609-6614
  31. Fan Q, Yee CL, Ohyama M, Tock C, Zhang G, et al. (2006) Bone marrow-derived keratinocytes are not detected in normal skin and only rarely detected in wounded skin in two different murine models. ExpHematol 34: 672-679
  32. Denton CP, Abraham DJ (2001) Transforming growth factor-beta and connective tissue growth factor: key cytokines in scleroderma pathogenesis. CurrOpinRheumatol 13: 505-511
  33. Werner S, Grose (2003) R: Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 83: 835-870
  34. Heldin CH, Landström M, Moustakas A (2009) Mechanism of TGF-beta signaling to growth arrest, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CurrOpin Cell Biol 21: 166-176
  35. Pannu J, Gore-Hyer E, Yamanaka M, Smith EA, Rubinchik S, et al. (2004) An increased transforming growth factor beta receptor type I:type II ratio contributes to elevated collagen protein synthesis that is resistant to inhibition via a kinase-deficient transforming growth factor beta receptor type II in scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum 50: 1566-1577
  36. Pannu J, Gardner H, Shearstone JR, Smith E, Trojanowska (2006) M: Increased levels of transforming growth factor beta receptor type I and upregulation of matrix gene program: A model of scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum 54: 3011-3021
  37. Leask A (2008) Targeting the TGF-β, endothelin-1 and CCN2 axis to combat fibrosis in scleroderma. Cell Signal 20: 1409-1414
  38. Shi-wen X, Parapuram SK, Pala D, Chen Y, Carter DE, et al. (2009) Requirement of transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1 for transforming growth factor beta-induced alpha-smooth muscle actin expression and extracellular matrix contraction in fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum 60: 234-241
  39. Thannickal VJ, Lee DY, White ES, Cui Z, Larios JM, et al. (2003) Myofibroblast differentiation by transforming growth factor-beta1 is dependent on cell adhesion and integrin signaling via focal adhesion kinase. J BiolChem 278: 12384-12389
  40. Leask A, Holmes A, Black CM, Abraham DJ (2003) Connective tissue growth factor gene regulation: Requirements for its induction by transforming growth factor-beta 2 in fibroblasts. J BiolChem 278: 13008-13015
  41. Li F, Zeng B, Chai Y, Cai P, Fan C, Cheng T (2009) The linker region of Smad2 mediates TGF-beta-dependent ERK2-induced collagen synthesis. BiochemBiophys Res Commun 386: 289-293
  42. Shi-Wen X, Chen Y, Denton CP, Eastwood M, Renzoni EA, et al. (2004) Endothelin-1 promotes myofibroblast induction through the ETA receptor via a rac/phosphoinositide3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway and is essential for the enhanced contractile phenotype of fibrotic fibroblasts. MolBiol Cell 15: 2707-2719
  43. Xu SW, Howat SL, Renzoni EA, Holmes A, Pearson JD, et al. (2004) Endothelin-1 induces expression of matrix-associated genes in lung fibroblasts through MEK/ERK. J BiolChem 279: 23098-23103
  44. Nishibu A, Sakai E, Oyama N, Yamamoto T (2012) Endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan improves the dermal sclerosis in a patient with systemic sclerosis. Australas J Dermatol 53: e32-33
  45. Cozzi F, Pigatto E, Rizzo M, Favaro M, Zanatta E, et al. (2013) Low occurrence of digital ulcers in scleroderma patients treated with bosentan for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective case-control study. ClinRheumatol 32: 679-683
  46. Mori T, Kawara S, Shinozaki M, Hayashi N, Kakinuma T, et al. (1999) Role and interaction of connective tissue growth factor with transforming growth factor-beta in persistent fibrosis: A mouse fibrosis model. J Cell Physiol 181: 153-159
  47. Sonnylal S, Shi-Wen X, Leoni P, Naff K, Van Pelt CS, et al. (2010) Selective expression of connective tissue growth factor in fibroblasts in vivo promotes systemic tissue fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum 62: 1523-1532
  48. Shi-wen X, Stanton LA, Kennedy L, Pala D, Chen Y, et al. (2006) CCN2 is necessary for adhesive responses to transforming growth factor-beta1 in embryonic fibroblasts. J BiolChem 281: 10715-10726
  49. Bonner JC (2004) Regulation of PDGF and its receptors in fibrotic diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 15: 255-273
  50. Rhee S, Grinnell F (2006) P21-activated kinase 1: convergence point in PDGF and LPA-stimulated collagen matrix contraction by human fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 172: 423-432
  51. Rajkumar VS, Shiwen X, Bostrom M, Leoni P, Muddle J, et al. (2006) Platelet-derived growth factor-beta receptor activation is essential for fibroblast and pericyte recruitment during cutaneous wound healing. Am J Pathol 169: 2254-2265
  52. Bhattacharyya S, Ishida W, Wu M, Wikes M, Mori Y, et al. (2008) A non-Smad mechanism of fibroblast activation by transforming growth factor-beta via c-Abl and Egr-1: selective modulation by imatinibmesylate. Oncogene 28: 1285-1297
  53. Pannu J, Asano Y, Nakerakanti S, Smith E, Jablonska S, et al. (2008) Smad1 pathway is activated in systemic sclerosis fibroblasts and is targeted by imatinibmesylate. Arthritis Rheum 58: 2528-2537
  54. Gailit J, Marchese MJ, Kew RR, Gruber BL (2001) The differentiation and function of myofibroblasts is regulated by mast cell mediators. J Invest Dermatol 117: 1113-1119
  55. Schramek H, Feifel E, Marschitz I, Golochtchapova N, Gstraunthaler G, et al. (2003) Loss of active MEK1-ERK1/2 restores epithelial phenotype and morphogenesis in transdifferentiated MDCK cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C652-661
  56. Chino T, Tamai K, Yamazaki T, Otsuru S, Kikuchi Y, et al. (2008) Bone marrow cell transfer into fetal circulation can ameliorate genetic skin diseases by providing fibroblasts to the skin and inducing immune tolerance. Am J Pathol 173: 803-814
  57. Fuchs E, Horsley V (2008) More than one way to skin. Genes Dev22: 976-985
  58. Palumbo R, Sampaolesi M, De Marchis F, Tonlorenzi R, Colombetti S, et al. (2004) Extracellular HMGB1, a signal of tissue damage, induces mesoangioblast migration andproliferation. J Cell Biol 164: 441-449
  59. Baxevanis AD, Landsman D (1995) The HMG-1 box protein family: Classification and functional relationships. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 1604–1613
  60. Christiano AM, Greenspan DS, Hoffman GG, Zhang X, Tamai Y, et al. (1993) A missense mutation in type VII collagen in two affected siblings with recessive dystrophic epidermolysisbullosa. Nat Genet 4: 62-66
  61. Jonkman MF, de Jong MC, Heeres K, Pas HH, van der Meer JB, et al. (1995) 180-kD bullous pemphigoid antigen (BP180) is deficient in generalized atrophic benign epidermolysisbullosa. J Clin Invest 95: 1345-1352
  62. Honczarenko M, Le Y, Swierkowski M, Ghiran I, Glodek AM, et al. (2006) Human bone marrow stromal cells express a distinct set of biologically functional chemokine receptors. Stem Cells 24: 1030-1041
  63. Sordi V, Malosio ML, Marchesi F, Mercalli A, Melzi R, et al. (2005) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells express a restricted set of functionally active chemokine receptors capable of promoting migration to pancreatic islets. Blood 106: 419-427
  64. Fujita Y, Abe R, Inokuma D, Sasaki M, Hoshina D, et al. (2010) Bone marrow transplantation restores epidermal basement membrane protein expression and rescues epidermolysisbullosa model mice. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 107: 14345-14350
  65. Wu Y, Huang S, Enhe J, Ma K, Yang S, et al. (2013) Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell attenuates skin fibrosis development in mice. Int Wound J.
Citation: Oyama N (2014) Dynamic Action of Myofibroblasts in Skin and Bone Marrow Transplantation. J Bone Marrow Res 2:143.

Copyright: © 2014 Oyama N, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top