Journal of Women's Health Care

Journal of Women's Health Care
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0420

Research Article - (2021)Volume 10, Issue 3

Utilization of Long Acting and Permanent Contraceptive Methods and Associated Factors among Married Women of Reproductive Age Group in Goba Town, Southeast Ethiopia

Ahmed Yasin Mohammed, Tilahun Ermeko* and Abate Lette Wodera
 
*Correspondence: Tilahun Ermeko, Department of Public Health, Goba Referral Hospital, Madda Walabu University, Ethiopia, Tel: +251909648032, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Background: Ethiopia is the second most populous country in Africa. The total fertility rate of Ethiopia is 4.8 births per women with population growth rate of 2.13% per year and contraception prevalence rate of 29% while the unmet need for family planning is 25% for spacing 16% and 9% for limiting. Almost all of these users are using modern contraceptive method. The most widely used are injectable (21%) followed by implant (3%) and intrauterine contraceptive device (2%) and female sterilization (<1%) are the least used.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the utilization of long-acting and permanent family planning methods and associated factors among married women of reproductive age group in Goba town, Bale zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia 2017.

Methods: A community based cross sectional study was conducted. Data collection was performed using pre tested structured questionnaire. The households were chosen at regular interval using systematic sampling method. Data was analysed by SPSS version 22and association of dependent and predictors using variable was declared at 95%CI on P<0.05.

Result: A total of 354 women during collection period were interviewed. The response rate was 98.9%. The overall prevalence of LAPMs contraceptives was 18.9%; the least used methods were female and male sterilization. Sixty three point six percent of women have knowledge about LAPMs and more than half of respondents (54.5%) have an intention to use LAPMs. The major source of modern contraceptive was governmental health facility (72.5%) and knowledge about LAPMs, support using LAPMs, partner attitude towards LAPMs, intention to use LAPMs, discussion with partner about LAPMs and knowledge about LAPMs have association with utilization of LAPMs.

Conclusion: Utilization of LAPMs in Goba town was low. More than half of the respondents know about LAPMs. The majority of respondent support use of LAPMs. Therefore, Goba hospital should increase accessibility of contraceptive especially. Media should increase provision of accurate and continues information on LAPMs.

Keywords

Long Acting and Permanent Contraceptives, Utilization, Married Women, Reproductive Age Women

Background

In 2002 the world population projection is just over nine billion. Because of poor family planning services and poor attitudes in many parts of the world earth may be forced to accommodate many more than this number [1]. Developing countries have made much progression expanding availability and use of FP service. Thus the need for effective contraception in general and long acting and permanent methods (LAPMs) in particular is a large and growing; because the largest cohorts in human history are entering their reproductive years. More than half of a billion people will use contraceptive in developing countries by 2015, an increase of 200 million over level of use in 2000 [2].

Contraceptive prevalence and fertility rates vary substantially among developing countries. In some countries of Asia and Latin America at least three fourth of married women use contraceptive methods. In contrast in sub-Saharan African countries, less than 80% of married women use contraceptive [3,4]. Fertility rate 2.3 children per women in Vietnam and 7.2 in Niger [5]. The rate of use of long-term methods was found to be almost negligible; it ranged from 0.4% to 5.9% and exceeded 5% only in Namibia, Kenya and Malawi. Moreover, percentage-point increases in the use of long-term methods had been small to negligible and five countries (Cameroon, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda and Senegal) had experienced a reversal trend in use [6].

A number of factors could contribute to lack of availability and access to LAPMs; these factors include opposition to use, lack of knowledge, method related reason and fertility related reason could act as barriers to LAPMs use [7-11]. The accessibility of LAPMs inhibited by higher cost to individual or the ministry of health, lack of trained providers and wide availability of short acting method in rural areas where most people live and distant to clinics and medical barriers [12].

One of targets the ministry of health (MOH) with respect to improving maternal and child health, is to increase the contraceptive prevalence rate to 66% by 2015. In order to achieve this target, the ministry has given priority to provision of safe maternal hood services such as FP in the community [4].

Ethiopia is one of the countries with the highest maternal mortality. The major causes of mortality are unsafe abortion, bleeding, infection, hypertensive diseases during pregnancy and obstructed labor [3]. Total fertility in Ethiopia is 4.8 births per women. In rural area women bear an average of 5.5 children in urban area 2.6 children nearly half of their rural counterparts and population growth rate is 2.13 which makes Ethiopia the second most populous in Africa [4].

Since the prevalence of LAPMs is very low in Goba town before decades, we are going to reassess prevalence, knowledge, attitude and factor associated with use of the methods among married women of reproductive age group in the town [13-22].

Methods

Study design, area and period

A community based cross -sectional study was conducted from January to February 2017 in Goba town. Goba town is found in Bale zone, Oromia region south east Ethiopia which is 455 km far from Addis Ababa. The town is divided in to east and west with total population of 50,650. About 52.1% population are female 47.9% of population are male. The town has one hospital and five private clinics.

Sample size determination

The sample size was determined by using single population for finite population with 95% confidence interval, degree of accuracy (d) of 5% and the prevalence (p) was calculated by using similar study done in Goba town and calculated from knowledge of LAPMs which was 66.7%(13), 5% non-response rate and the final sample size calculated to be 358.

Sampling technique

The household was chosen at regular interval using systematic sampling technique sampling frame which is 6273 and sample size is 358. The sampling fraction will be 6273/358=17.The first household will be selected randomly out of 17, it is 10 and the other household will select as followed 10+17,10+34,10+51,10+68…… until 358 women will be selected.

Data collection tools

The data collection was performed using structured questioners for interview. The interviewer administer questioner have socio demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitude and practice of LAMPs of family planning questions. The data collectors (student) were collected the data from women of reproductive age group in Goba town. The questionnaire was translated from English to local language (Afan Oromo) by independent translators.

Data quality control

Questionnaires were translated from English to local language (Afan Oromo) by independent translators. Before data collection data collectors were discuss on how to collect data, and then it was collected properly. After each data collection day, the completeness of the data was reviewed.

Data analysis

SPSS 22 was used for data entry, editing and analysis. Frequencies and percentage of different variables was computed for description as appropriate. And association of dependent and independent variable was assessed by cross tabulating (Chi-square test). Result was presented by numbers, percent and tables.

Ethical consideration

The data collection was carried out after approval of the research proposal by the Ethical clearance of MWU College of medicine and health science. A verbal informed consent was obtained from individual participants before data collection and all participants in the study were asked that participation is on voluntary basis.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

In this study a total of 358 married women of reproductive age group were included with response rate 98.9% (354). Majority of the respondents 91(25.7) were in the age group of 25-29. The ethnicity of the respondents were Oromo 188(53.1%) followed by Amhara 144(40.7%). The religion of most respondents was Orthodox 228(64.4%) followed by Muslim 89 (25.1). Thirty seven (10.5%) of respondents had no education and 96 (27.1%) respondents had educational level of grade 9-12. Majority of study subjects were housewife 247(69.8%), followed by governmental employee 42(11.9%) and their partners were governmental employee 134(37.9%) next to this privet employee account 93(17.8%). Two hundred forty eight (70.1%) respondents have television (Table 1).

Variable Frequency Percent
Age in years
15-24 88 24.6
25-29 91 25.4
30-39 117 32.7
40-49 62 17.3
Educational level
Can’t read and write 17 4.8
Can read and write 26 7.3
Grade1-4 14 4
Grade5-8 79 7.3
Grade9-12 107 30.2
Grade12 and above 111 31.4
Occupation
House wife 247 69.8
Governmental employee 42 11.9
Private employee 15 4.2
Daily laborer 12 3.4
Farmer 8 2.3
Students 30 8.4
Occupational status of partners
Governmental employee 134 37.9
Private employee 63 17.8
Daily laborer 48 13.6
Farmer 86 24.3
Other 23 6.5
Monthly income
<500 61 17.2
>=500 293 82.8
Do you have TV
Yes 248 70.1
No 106 29.9
Do you have  Radio
Yes 317 89.5
No 37 10.5

Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of study participant.

Reproductive characteristics

Among study subjects, 79(22.3%) of respondents want to give birth within two years; while 275(77.7%) do not need have child within this year, 130(47.3%) for limiting, 98(35.6%) for spacing and 47(17.1%) have other reason. From the total study subjects most of the respondents 174(49.2%) have 3-4 children in their life, 92(26%) 1-2 and 85(24%) want to have 5 and more children in their life. Majority of our respondents 249(78.8%) have discussed about family planning methods with their partner. Also majority 276(78%) of giving decision on number of children to have is by both husband (Table 2).

RH Characteristics Category Frequency Percentage
Ever gave birth Yes 285 80.5
No 69 19.5
Age at first birth 15-29 99 34.6
20-24 129 45.1
25-29 56 19.6
30-34 2 0.7
Number of  birth given One/two 123 43.2
Three/four 93 32.6
Five/more 69 24.3
Number of alive children Zero    
One/two 133 46.7
Three/four 97 34
Five/more 55 19.3
More  children wanted Zero 142 49.8
One/two 120 42.1
 Three/four 21 7.4
Five / more 2 0.7
Intention to have children within two years Yes 79 22.3
No 275 77.7
Reason for not to have child within  two years To space 98 35.6
To limit 130 47.3
Other 47 17.1
Total children wanted Zero 2 0.6
One/two 92 26
 Three/four 174 49.2
Five / more 86 24.2
Discussion with partner on FP Yes 279 78.8
No 75 21.2
Decision making on No of children to have Husband 7 2
Wife 22 6.2
Both 276 78
God 49 13.8

Table 2: Reproductive characteristics of study participants.

Knowledge towards modern contraceptives

Three hundred twenty (90.4%) of participant know about modern contraceptives of this pills 315(89%), injectable 310(87.6%), implant 223(62.99%), IUCD 176(49.7%), female sterilization 101(28.5%), male sterilization 63(17.8%) and condom 236(66.6%). Health professionals were identified as the most commonly mentioned source of information for the first time on methods of modern contraceptive which account182 (56.2%). From the total study subjects 225(63.6%) respondents were know about LAPMs. Of this, 120(53.1%) had message on LAPMs through television (81%), in the last 12 months. The most known LAPMs of contraceptive were Implant 224(99.5%) and the least known was male sterilization 62(27.5%). The majority of the respondents 223(99.1%) knows that LAPMs can prevent unwanted pregnancy. One hundred seventy-three (76.9%) women were know about IUCD prevent pregnancy for more than five years and 111(49.3%) were know that it can be reversed immediately. Two hundred fifty (95.6%) and 153(68%) women know that implant is long term and require minor surgical procedure respectively. Only 39(17.3%) of respondents knows that implant has no effect on breast feeding (Table 3).

Characteristics Category Frequency Percent
Type of modern contraceptive known Pills 315 89
Injectable 310 87.6
Implant 224 63.5
IUD 176 49.9
TL 100 28.2
Vasectomy 62 17.5
Condom 235 66.4
Neighbors/friends/relatives 82 25.3
Source of information on modern contraceptive Health professionals 182 56.2
Mass media 28 8.6
Husband 19 5.9
Other 13 4
Know about LAPMs Yes 225 63.6
No 129 36.4
Ever exposure to LAPMs within last 12 months Yes 120 53.3
No 105 46.7
Type of media you Exposed Television 98 81
Radio 12 9.9
Print media 10 9.1
Implant 224 99.5
Type of LAPMs you know IUD 176 78.2
TL 100 28.2
Vasectomy 62 27.5
 General use of LAPMs Helps for prevention of unwanted pregnancy 223 99.1
Prevention of possible maternal and child death 88 39.1
Limiting of family size 119 52.9
Child spacing 195 86.7
Knowledge about IUD It  is very effective 86 38.2
It is long term 173 76.9
No effect on BF 44 19.6
Not good for female at  high risk of sexual transmitted infections 20 8.9
No interference with sexual intercourse 54 24
Immediately reversible 111 49.3
Has minimal side affect others 52 23.1
Knowledge about implant It is very effective 99 44
It is long term 215 95.6
No effect on BF 39 17.3
Insertion and removal require minor surgery 153 68
No interference with daily Activity 105 46.7
Immediately reversible 139 62.1
Has minimal SE 57 25.3
Knowledge about vasectomy It is very effective after 3 months of operation 9 4
It is permanent 62 27.6
Requires safe and simple procedure 37 16.4
Don’t need repeated clinic visit 44 19.6
No effect on sexual performance and sensation 20 8.9
No known long term side effect 17 7.6
Requires counseling and informed consent 18 8
Knowledge about TL It is very effective 30 13.3
It is permanent 96 42.7
Requires safe and simple procedure 46 20.4
Don’t need repeated clinic visit 65 28.9
No effect on sexual performance and sensation 22 9.8
No known long term SE 20 8.9
Requires counseling and informed consent 20 8.9

Table 3: Knowledge towards modern contraceptive.

Attitude towards LAPMs

One hundred seventy six (49.7%) of the respondents were discussed about the LAPMs with their partner or friends. Of the total study population 261(73.7%) support using LAPMs and 193(54.5%) have intention to use LAPMs. One hundred sixty eight (47.5%) of participants partner`s support using LAPMs and the most responsible body to practice contraception were both wife and husband 192 (54.2%) (Table 4).

Attitude factors( characteristics) Category Frequency Percentage
Discussion about LAMPs  with partner Yes 176 49.7
No 178 50.3
Support using LAPMs Yes 261 73.7
No 93 26.3
Partner attitude towards using LAPMs Support 168 47.5
Against 61 17.2
Neutral 125 35.3
 Have an intention to use LAPMs yes 193 54.5
 No   161 45.5
Who is responsible in using LAPMs Wife 158 44.6
Husband 4 1.1
Both 192 54.2

Table 4: Attitudes towards LAPMs of the study participants.

Practice of modern contraceptives

Currently 215(60.7%) of the study population are using modern contraceptives. Injectable 98(45.6%) is commonly used method, followed by implant 47(21.9) (Figure 1). Need to be pregnant is the most common reason of not using contraceptive, 43(30.7%). Most commonly mentioned source family planning methods for current using is governmental hospital 130(62.8%) (Table 5).

womens-health-care-contraceptive

Figure 1. Current use of contraceptive among mothers.

Variables   Frequency Percent
Ever used a modern contraceptive Yes 273 77.1
No 81 22.9
Which method you used Pills 68 25.3
Injectable 131 47.9
Implant 48 17.6
IUCD 12 4.4
FS 2 0.7
Condom 9 3.3
Others 2 0.7
Reason for not used Lack of knowledge 26 32.9
Lack of access 0 0
To get pregnant 19 23.45
Fear of infertility 3 3.7
Partner disapproval 3 3.7
Fear of side effect 2 2.46
It is sinful to use 13 16.04
Culture taboo 11 13.58
others 4 4.93
Do you using modern contraceptive currently Yes 215 60.7
No 139 39.3
Reason for  not used modern contraceptive now I am pregnant 23 16.4
I want to be pregnant 43 30.7
I am on exclusive breast feeding 13 9.3
I fear side effect 22 15.7
Others 39 27.9

Table 5: Practice of modern contraceptives and intention to use LAPMs.

Factors associated with utilization of LAPMs

Age, educational level, number of alive children, discussion with partner about FP , knowledge about LAPMs ,support using LAPMs , partners attitude toward using LAPMs, intention to use LAPMs, discussion about LAPMs with partners and knowledge about LAPMs have statistically significant association with utilization of LAPMs with chi –square test and p-value <0.05 (Table 6).

Variables Chi square P-value
Age 13.752 0.033
Religion 3.358 0.34
Educational level 12.421 0.029
Partner`s educational level 8.134 0.149
Monthly income 0.027 0.87
Number of births give 7.62 0.06
Number of alive children 6.856 0.032
Number of more children 3.337 0.342
Wont to have a child with in two years  3.762 0.052
Number of children wanted in life 2.955 0.565
Discussion with partner about FP 9.321 0.002
Decider on the number of children want to have 6.868 0.076
Knowledge about LAPMs 26.955 0
Support using LAPMs 20.265 0
Partner attitude about using LAPMs 33.595 0
Intention to use LAPMs 38.105 0
Discussion with partner about LAPMs 34.643 0
Knowledge about LAPMs 26.955 0

Table 6: Factors associated with utilization of LAPMs.

Discussion

The overall utilization modern contraceptive was 60.7%. OF this LAPMs utilization was (18.9 %) from this implant, IUCD, female sterilization and male sterilization accounts 13.3%,4.5%,0.8% and 0.3% respectively. which is higher than the prevalence reported in Goba 8.7% [13]. This might be due to increase in access to service, availability of health extension workers and continues promotion of contraceptives through media. Similar study also conducted on Mekele town show that the overall utilization of LAPMs was 12.3%, from this implant and IUCD counts 87% and 13% respectively. This discrepancy might be due to difference in resident of study participants and study period. The major source to obtain contraceptive for married women was a governmental health facility (72.5%). This result was similar with finding of EDHS 2011 (82%) and Mekele (83%) [4,11].

The reason cited by women who did not use modern contraceptive were fear of side effect (15.7%), want to be pregnant (30.7%,) current pregnancy (16.4%), exclusive breast feeding and other (27.9%). However, in the study conducted in Mekele town the main reason cited by marred women for not using LAPMs was the use of another method of contraceptives 93.3%, developing side effect 3.9%, not allowed by husband and medical problem 1.6% and the non-availability of service 1.3% [11]. In this study majority of respondents did not want to have a child with in two years for the reason that limiting 47.3% than spacing 35.6%.

This study showed those 90.4% respondents were known about modern contraceptive. Of this pills 89%, injectable 87.6%, implant 63.5%, IUCD 49.9%, female sterilization 28.2%, male sterilization 17.5% and condom 66.4%.Similarly research done in Nigeria on community based study of contraceptives behaviours shows that most known type of modern contraceptive was pills (32.3%), followed by injectable(28.2%), condom (28.2%) and IUCD (18.5%) [14-17]. According to 2011 EDHS report knowledge of modern contraceptive among married women were 97.4%, the most known modern contraceptives was injectable which accounts 96.1% followed by pills (92.6%), condom 78.1%, implant 69.2%, female sterilization 39.8%, IUCD 26.4% and the least known is male sterilization (10.8%) [14]. Research conducted in butajira about 99% of women knew modern contraceptives of this 97.8%,97.5%,82%,81.9%,74.4% and 13.1% knew injectable ,pills, vasectomy, condom, Norplant and IUCD respectively. This difference might be due to availability of health extension worker and difference in setting area [20].

The overall knowledge of respondent about LAPMs was 63.6%. Of this the most known type was implant (99.5%) followed by IUCD (78.2%), female sterilization (28.2%) and male sterilization (27.5%). Another research conducted in Batu on demand for LAPMs and associated factor FP service users knowledge about LAPMs was 58.3%; implant was the most common known method account 94% followed by IUCD 49.6%, female sterilization 9% and male sterilization 7.8% [18-22]. The reason for this discrepancy is due to the difference in study area and time of data collection.

Among respondents who knew about LAPMs 99.1%, 86.7%, 52.9% and 39.1% knew that LAPMs used for prevention of unwanted prevention, child spacing, limiting family size and preventing maternal and child death in general respectively. According to this study of respondent knew that IUCD used for long term, immediately reversible, very effective, minimal side effect which account 76.6%, 49.3%, 38.2% and 23.1%respectivly. And only 8.9% knew that IUCD is not good for female at high risk for long term effect (95.6%) and others identified use of implant were immediate reversibility (62.1%), minimal side effect 25.3% and absence of effect on breast feeding (17.3%). Twenty seven point six percent of respondent knew that male sterilization is used for permanent effect and only 4% knew that full effectiveness of male sterilization after three month of procedure. In addition to this, 42.7% knew that irreversible effect of female sterilization and 8.9% did not know long term side effect.in contrast to this the study conducted in Mekele showed among the married women 77.5% and 44.4% had awareness on the advantage of LAPMs for prevention of unwanted pregnancy and helps to have planned family, 37.8% of the women were knew that IUCD can prevent pregnancy for 10 years, 42.5% were not sure of IUCD is good for female at risk of acquiring STI and 48% and 62.2% of the women aware of that IUCD has no influence on sexual intercourse and it results immediate pregnancy after removal respectively in addition to this the majority of married women 69.7% aware that implants result immediate pregnancy after removal and 33% of married women knew that male sterilization has no influence on sexual intercourse [11].

This study shows that 49.7% were discussed about LAPMs with their partner/friends and 73.7% support using LAPMs. More over 47.5% of their partner support using LAPMs and 17.2% opposes using LAPMs. Both husband and wife (54.2%) were responsible to practice contraception while husband and wife alone 1.1% and 44.6% respectively. In this study support using LAMPs, women educational status and discussion with partner about LAPMs were statically significant association with utilization of LAPMs. A research done on Butajira town shows that discussion with partner about LAPMs, women educational status and support using LAPMs were significant association with utilization of LAPMs. In addition, in this study intention to use LAPMs, partner attitude towards LAPMs, age and knowledge about LAPMs had also statically significant association with utilization of LAPMs. Despite of this monthly income, religion, partner education level, number children and decider on number of to have were not statically significant association with utilization of LAPMs.

This study had limitation in terms not including men as study participant to explore the difference in knowledge, attitude and practice between men and women. It did not particularly ask the involvement of men in the utilization of family planning and their intention towards its use. Farther more as it is crosses sectional study it was difficult to know which occurred first cause and effect.

Conclusion

Utilization of LAPMs of contraceptive in the town was 18.9%. Knowledge of LAPMs was 63.6% and the most and the least known method was implant and vasectomy respectively. Governmental health facility is the main source of modern contraceptive for current utilization and the major source of information on modern contraceptives was health professionals. Majority of respondents support using LAPMs and more than half have intention to use LAPMs.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no any competing interests.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Madda Walabu University for supporting this study. We are also very grateful to data collectors and study participants to undertake this study.

References

  1. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2002_world_population_to_2300.pdf
  2. Jacobstein R. Long-acting and permanent contraception: an international development, service delivery perspective. J Midwifery & Women's Health 2007;52(4):361-367.
  3. http://158.232.12.119/entity/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/ethiopia_access_rh.pdf
  4. https://www.comminit.com/africa/content/long-acting-and-permanent-methods-addressing-unmet-need-family-planning-africa
  5. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ethiopia-health-and-health-related-indicators-2007-2008
  6. DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Laufer N, Roman AS. Current diagnosis and treatment, obstetrics and gynecology 10th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education. 2007.
  7. https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/Family%20Health%20Research%20-%20Long%20Acting%20and%20Permanent%20Methods.pdf
  8. Credé S, Hoke T, Constant D, Green MS, Moodley J, Harries J. Factors impacting knowledge and use of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods by postpartum HIV positive and negative women in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:197.
  9. Alemayehu M, Belachew T, Tilahun T. Factors associated with utilization of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods among married women of reproductive age in Mekelle town, Tigray region, north Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:6.
  10. https://toolkits.knowledgesuccess.org/toolkits/permanent-methods/long-acting-and-permanent-methods-contraception-without-them-countrys
  11. Takele A, Degu G, Yitayal M. Demand for long acting and permanent methods of contraceptives and factors for non-use among married women of Goba Town, Bale Zone, South East Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2012;9:26.
  12. http://digitallab.wldu.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/1232/3/1%20Gyn%26obslecture%20note%20.pdf
  13. Ibnouf AH, Van den Borne HW, Maarse JA. Utilization of family planning services by married Sudanese women of reproductive age. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2007;13(6):1372-1381.
  14. Getachew M. Assessement of the prevalence and factor affecting use of permanent and long acting contraceptive methods in Jinka town, south Omo zone, SNNPR. Public Health. 2008:1-6.
  15. Oye-Adeniran BA, Adewole IF, Umoh AV, Oladokun A, Gbadegesin A, Ekanem EE. Community-based study of contraceptive behaviour in Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2006;10(2):90-104.
  16. Haile A, Fantahun M. Demand for long acting and permanent contraceptive methods and associated factors among family planning service users, Batu town, Central Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2012;50(1):31-42.
  17. Weldegerima B, Denekew A. Womens knowledge, prefenceand practice of modern contraceptive method in Woreta, Ethiopia. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008;4(3):302-307.
  18. Mekonnen W, Worku A. Determinants of low family planning use and high unmet need in Butajira District, South Central EthiopiA. Reprod Health. 2011;8:37.
  19. Bogale B, Wondafrash M, Tilahun T, Girma E. Married women's decision making power on modern contraceptive use in urban and rural southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:342.
  20. Creanga AA, Gillespie D, Karklins S, Tsuia AO. Low use of contraception among poor women in Africa: an equity issue. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(4):258-266.

Author Info

Ahmed Yasin Mohammed, Tilahun Ermeko* and Abate Lette Wodera
 
Department of Public Health, Goba Referral Hospital, Madda Walabu University, Bale Goba, Ethiopia
 

Citation: Mohammed AY, Ermeko T, Wodera AL (2021) Utilization of Long Acting and Permanent Contraceptive Methods and Associated Factors among Married Women of Reproductive Age Group in Goba Town, Southeast Ethiopia. J Women's Health Care 10:521. doi:10.35248/2167-0420.21.10.521.

Received: 17-Feb-2021 Accepted: 10-Mar-2021 Published: 17-Mar-2021 , DOI: 10.35248/2167-0420.21.10.521

Copyright: © 2021 Mohammed AY, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Top