GET THE APP

The Association between Vitamin D Receptor FokI Gene Polymorphism
Journal of Osteoporosis and Physical Activity

Journal of Osteoporosis and Physical Activity
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-9509

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2015) Volume 3, Issue 3

The Association between Vitamin D Receptor FokI Gene Polymorphism and Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis

Jihong Zhang1*, Zhipeng Ai1, Xianming Ning2, Hong Liu2, Wenru Tang1 and Ying Luo1
1Faculty of Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
2Orthopedics Department, The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China
*Corresponding Author: Jihong Zhang, Faculty of Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China, Tel: +86 871 6519 4108 Email:

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantitatively summarize the evidence for VDR FokI gene polymorphism and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal women.

Materials and methods: Electronic search at PubMed, EMBASE, Weipu database, and Wanfang database was conducted to select studies. Case-control studies containing available genotype frequencies of F/f were chosen, and Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the strength of this revelance.

Results: The case-control studies including 2199 osteoporosis cases and 2231 controls were identified. Overall meta-analysis indicated that individuals with the homozygous ff genotype had increased risk of osteoporosis(Recessive model: OR=1.551, 95% CI: 1.035~2.325,p=0.034).In the stratified analysis, individuals with the ff genotype in the Recessive model had increased risk of osteoporosis in Asian subjects(OR=2.644, 95% CI: 1.583~4.419,p= 0.000),but not in Caucasian subjects(OR= 1.288, 95%CI: 0.783~2.118, p = 0.318) and Mixed subjects (OR= 0.885, 95%CI: 0.686~1.141, p =0.346). A symmetric funnel plot, the Begg- test (P=0.094) suggested that lack of publication bias. The studies conducted in each of the defined number of osteoporosis—had no effect of the FokI polymorphism on osteoporosis except for the ff versus Ff+FF genotype comparison for osteoporosis subgroup.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that VDR Fok I genotype is associated with increased risk of osteoporosis in Asian but not in caucasian. To draw comprehensive and true conclusions, further prospective studies with larger numbers of participants worldwide are needed to examine associations between VDR Fok I polymorphism and osteoporosis.

<

Keywords: Vitamin D receptor; Fok I polymorphism; Osteoporosis; Postmenopausal; Meta-analysis

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a progressive bone disease that is characterised by a decrease in bone mass and density and that leads to an increased risk of fracture. In osteoporosis, the bone mineral density (BMD) is reduced, bone microarchitecture deteriorates, and the amount and variety of proteins in bone are altered. Both environmental and genetic factors are the etiology of osteoporosis. In addition, family and twin studies show that osteoporosis is a multi-gene regulation, strong hereditary diseases [1]. Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures had brought serious harms to families and societies due to its high incidence, mortality, and medical costs [2]. The early identification of a person who is at risk to develop osteoporotic fractures is therefore of major clinical interest. Morrison’s study have shown that vitamin D receptor has been associated with Bone Mineral Density (BMD), which is the major determinant of osteoporosis risk [3,4]. Since then, many factors about the relationship between gene polymorphism, BMD and fracture were intensively investigated, such as typecollagen gene, calcitonin receptor gene, low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein gene and cannabinoid receptor genes [5-7]. However, vitamin D receptor gene is the most studied and controversial gene.

Vitamin D receptor gene is located on chromosome 12 (12q13.1), longer than 100 kb. Through the genome of a single nucleotide polymorphism frequency analysis, the vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism should be more than 100 kinds [8,9]. We know vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms mainly related to four single nucleotide polymorphisms (BsmI, TaqI, ApaI and FokI) from recent study [10]. Fang et al. performed a meta-analysis relating BsmI or TaqI polymorphisms of the VDR gene with Osteoporosis risk [11]. They searched published studies from 1996 to September 2005 through PubMed and evaluated the genetic effect of the BsmI and TaqI polymorphism of VDR on fracture risk and found out that there was no relationship between the VDR BsmI or TaqI polymorphism and fracture risk.

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a common disease associated with aging, mainly in postmenopausal eldly women, which seriously affect their health and quality of life, and even shorten life expectancy [12-14]. Gross et al. [15] conducted a study in postmenopausal Mexican-American women, showed that FokI polymorphism of the VDR gene correlates significantly with decreased BMD at the lumbar spine and an increased rate of bone loss at the hip in ff subjects. In another study of postmenopausal Italian women population, Gennari L [16] observed a weak association between FokI polymorphism and lumbar BMD (p = 0.06) but no reveland to femoral neck BMD(p = 0.5). Base on VDR biological functions, FokI can be seen as a candidate gene for osteoporosis. Accumulating studies have investigated the association between this polymorphism and osteoporosis [17,18]. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the effect of the FokI polymorphism on the risk of osteoporosis.

Materials and Methods

Publication search

We searched the PubMed,EMBASE,Weipu database and Wanfang database for all articles on the association between VDR FokI and osteoporosis risklast search updateAugust 21, 2014. The following key words were used 'VDR FokI', 'polymorphism' and 'osteoporosis' or 'fracture'. Case-control studies containing available genotype frequencies of FokI were chosen. Of the studies with overlapping data published by the same author, only the most recent or complete study was included in this meta-analysis.

Statistic analysis

For control group of each study, the observed genotype frequencies of the VDR FokI polymorphism were assessed for Hardy Weinberg – EquilibriumHWE using the χ2 test. The strength of association between VDR FokI gene and osteoporosis was accessed by calculating crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled ORs were performed for additive genetic model (f vs.F), dominant model (ff+Ff vs. FF), and recessive model (ff vs. Ff+ FF) respectively. Heterogeneity assumption was evaluated by a chi-square based Q-test. A significant Q-statistic (P<0.05) indicated heterogeneity across studies. The summary OR estimate of each study was calculated by he fixed-effects model if there was not significant heterogeneity. Otherwise, the random-effects model was employed [19,20]. The potential for publication bias was examined by a Begg's test (funnel plot method) and Egger’s linear regression test (P<0.05 considered representative of statistical significance) [21]. All analyses were performed using Stata software (version 9.0; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

Results

Eligible studies

We identified 12 studies on the association between VDR FokI and osteoporosis, including 2199 osteoporosis and 2231 controls in our meta-analysis (Figure 1 and Table 1).

osteoporosis-physical-search-results

Figure 1: Flow chart indicating search results

Author year Ethnicitya     Osteoporosis     Control Pb
FF Ff ff FF Ff ff
Yasovanthi J(26) 2011 Asian 177 201 49 219 225 16 <0.05
Xing SJ(27) 2011 Asian 7 14 11 27 35 8 0.51
Mitra S(28) 2006 Asian 38 42 39 46 33 18 0.011
Zhang ZL(29) 2002 Asian 40 23 3 29 27 5 0.711
Choi YM(30) 2000 Asian 12 23 13 26 33 6 0.327
Ozbas H(22) 2012 Caucasian 48 23 4 63 36 8 0.377
Mencej-Bedrac S(23) 2009 Caucasian 88 108 44 105 97 26 0.618
Zajickova K(24) 2002 Caucasian 26 28 11 7 21 5 0.111
Langdahl BL(25) 2002 Caucasian 28 41 10 34 31 15 0.11
Gennari L(16) 1999 Caucasian 60 73 31 53 55 11 0.542
Wengreen H(31) 2006 Mixed 329 367 123 322 389 143 0.168
Lisker R(14) 2003 Mixed 27 29 9 20 29 8 0.625

Table 1: The distribution of VDR FokI genotypes for osteoporosis and controls; a: Ethnicity: Mixed: mixed ethnicities. b: p value for Hardy– Weinberg equilibrium in control group

Five studies [16, 22-25] were performed in Caucasians and another five investigations [26-30] were conducted in Asians. Furthermore, two reports [14,31] were from mixed ethnicities. The data of our interest were extracted: first author’s surname, year of publication and the number of cases and controls for VDR FokI genotypes (Table 1 ). The distribution of genotypes in the controls of the studies were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, except two study [26,28].

Meta-analysis

Differences in allelic distribution by ethnicity could be partially responsible for the observed differences in the association between VDR FokI and osteoporosis. The results of the association between the VDR FokI polymorphism, osteoporosis and the heterogeneity test are shown in Table 2.

Genetice model Population  Pooled OR [95% CI] p Heterogeneity Publication Bias
p-value  p-value  
  Begg p-value
    Egger
Additive Caucasian 1.118 [0.854~1.464]0.418 0.072 0.014 0.019
(f vs. F)
  Asian 1.491[1.063~2.091]0.021 0.013 0.624 0.867
  Mixed 0.912 [0.797~1.043]0.180 0.848 0.317 -
  overall 1.192[0.976~1.456] 0.085 0 0.125 0
Dominant Caucasian 1.115[0.776~1.602]0.558 0.086 0.05 0.062
(f-carriers vs.FF)
  Asian 1.397[0.936~2.086]0.102 0.062 0.624 0.768
  Mixed 0.891[0.737~1.078]0.235 0.662 0.317 -
  overall 1.149[0.919~1.436]0.222 0.006 0.232 0.038
Recessive Caucasian 1.288[0.783~2.118]0.318 0.135 0.327 0.238
(ff vs. F-carriers)
  Asian 2.644[1.583~4.419]0.000 0.137 0.142 0.45
  Mixed 0.885[0.686~1.141]0.346 0.834 0.317 -
  overall 1.551[1.035~2.325]0.034 0 0.125 0.094

Table 2: ORs and 95% CI for osteoporosis and the VDR FokI polymorphism under different genetic models

The association was most pronounced for carriers of the ff genotype (recessive model: OR= 1.551, 95% CI: 1.035~2.325, p= 0.034). The positive association was driven by an Asian recessive model: (OR= 2.644, 95% CI: 1.583~4.419, p= 0.000, P = 0.137 for heterogeneity, Figure 2 and 3).

osteoporosis-physical-Forest-plot

Figure 2: Additive: Forest plot of ORs of Osteoporosis FokI f allele when compared to the F allele (Additive model). The squares and horizontal lines correspond to the study-specific OR and 95% CI. The area of the squares reflects the study-specific weight. The diamond represents the pooled OR and 95% CI.

osteoporosis-physical-Osteoporosis-FokI

Figure 3: Recessive: Forest plot of ORs of Osteoporosis FokI ff genotype when compared to the F allele carriers (Ff +FF)(Recessive model). The squares and horizontal lines correspond to the studyspecific OR and 95% CI. The area of the squares reflects the studyspecific weight. The diamond represents the pooled OR and 95% CI.

No significant association was found in Caucasians (OR=1.288, 95% CI: 0.783~2.118, p= 0.318) and Mixed (OR=0.885, 95% CI: 0.686~1.141, p= 0.3346).

The geographic and race difference might affect the results of our analysis for the association of VDR FokI gene polymorphism with osteoporosis susceptibility. In order to evaluate this effect, we divided the population by ethnicity. In Caucasians, there was no a significant association between f allele or ff homozygous and osteoporosis susceptibility ( p = 0.418 and p = 0.558, respectively; Table 2), and the ff genotype seemed not to play a protective role against osteoporosis risk ( p = 0.318; Table 2). However, we found that there was an most pronounced association between VDR FokI gene polymorphism and osteoporosis susceptibility in Asians (f allele: p = 0.021; ff:p = 0.000; Table 2, Figure 4).

osteoporosis-physical-FF-genotype

Figure 4: Dominant: Forest plot of ORs of Osteoporosis FokI f allele carriers (ff + Ff) when compared to the FF genotype(Dominant model). The squares and horizontal lines correspond to the studyspecific OR and 95% CI. The area of the squares reflects the studyspecific weight. The diamond represents the pooled OR and 95% CI.

Publication bias

Funnel plot and Egger’s test were performed to quantitatively evaluate the publication bias of literatures on osteoporosis. The results of Begg- test provided statistical evidence for funnel plot symmetry (P=0.094) in overall results, suggesting the absence of publication bias.

Discussion

Polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) have been widely investigated with various populations. The first findings related to osteoporosis were carried out in 1994 on an Australian population of Caucasian [3]. VDR gene, has been recently postulated as a major genetic determinant of BMD and consequently of osteoporotic fracture risk [3,32,33]. Moreover, VDR FokI gene polymorphism is one of most important subtypes of VDR gene polymorphisms. This meta-analysis was performed to explore whether the VDR FokI gene polymorphism could predict the susceptibility of osteoporosis. Uitterlinden et al. [34] performed a meta-analysis including nine European research teams to explore the association of VDR Cdx2, BsmI, TaqI, ApaI and FokI polymorphisms with the risk of BMD or fracture in Caucasians, and found that the FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI VDR polymorphisms were not associated with BMD or with fractures, but the Cdx2 polymorphism might be associated with risk for vertebral fractures. Our result was different from Uitterlinden et al. [34]. In our study, we found that individuals with the homozygous ff genotype had increased risk of osteoporosis (OR=1.551, 95% CI: 1.035~2.325, p= 0.034 ) in overall populations. Sensitivity analysis was also performed and we found that the conclusions were similar to the nonsensitivity, and the publication bias test indicated that there was no publication bias for overall populations. The results from our study were robust. So, we might draw a conclusion that VDR Fok I gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of osteoporosis.

The studies of association between Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and osteoporosis can provide a theoretical basis for genetic diagnosis and treatment, which might lead to early treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. In addition, genetic polymorphism can also serve as a means of predicating medication efficacy at molecular level. Understanding the relationship between medication efficacy and certain genotypes might help us to choose not only targeted treatment and prevention, but also save cost of medicines and medical. Although there were a certain correlation between vitamin D receptor genotypes with bone mineral density, the pathogenesis of osteoporosis is quite complex. Osteoporosis is a polygenic disease and regulated by multiple genes. However, environmental factors and life style also have certain influence to the expression of genes [35]. Therefore, the relationship between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and osteoporosis should be multi-center and large sample studies, and considering the synergy of many factors.

In conclusion, our results support a genetic association between VDR Fokpolymorphisms and osteoporosis in overall populations but not in caucasians. Large studies might be necessary to validate this association in different populations incorporated with environmental factors in the susceptibility of osteoporosis.

References

  1. Sweet MG, Sweet JM, Jeremiah MP, Galazka SS (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 79: 193-200.
  2. Uitterlinden AG, Weel AE, Burger H, Fang Y, van Duijn CM, et al., (2001) Interaction between the vitamin D receptor gene and collagen type Ialpha1 gene in susceptibility for fracture. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 16: 379-85.
  3. Morrison NA, Qi JC, Tokita A, Kelly PJ, Crofts L, et al. (1994) Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature 367: 284-287.
  4. Kelly PJ, Morrison NA, Sambrook PN, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (1995) Genetic influences on bone turnover, bone density and fracture. Eur J Endocrinol 133: 265-271.
  5. Ralston SH, Uitterlinden AG, Brandi ML, Balcells S, Langdahl BL, et al., (2006) Ioannidis JP. Large-scale evidence for the effect of the COLIA1 Sp1 polymorphism on osteoporosis outcomes: the GENOMOS study. PLoS medicine 3: e90.
  6. Funakoshi Y, Omori H, Yada H, Katoh T (2010) Relationship between changes of bone mineral density over seven years and A1330V polymorphism of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 gene or lifestyle factors in Japanese female workers. Asia Pac J ClinNutr 19: 534-539.
  7. Karsak M, Malkin I, Toliat MR, Kubisch C, Nurnberg P, et al., (2009) The cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CNR2) gene is associated with hand bone strength phenotypes in an ethnically homogeneous family sample. Human genetics 126: 629-36.
  8. Horst-Sikorska W, Dytfeld J, Wawrzyniak A, Marcinkowska M, Michalak M, et al. (2013) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, bone mineral density and fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Mol Biol Rep 40: 383-390.
  9. Dennison EM, Arden NK, Keen RW, Syddall H, Day IN, et al. (2001) Birthweight, vitamin D receptor genotype and the programming of osteoporosis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15: 211-219.
  10. Ji GR, Yao M, Sun CY, Li ZH, Han Z (2010) BsmI, TaqI, ApaI and FokI polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene and risk of fracture in Caucasians: a meta-analysis. Bone 47: 681-686.
  11. Fang Y, Rivadeneira F, van Meurs JB, Pols HA, Ioannidis JP, et al. (2006) Vitamin D receptor gene BsmI and TaqI polymorphisms and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Bone 39: 938-945.
  12. Zajickova K, Zofkova I, Hill M (2005) Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, bone ultrasound and mineral density in post-menopausal women. Aging ClinExp Res 17: 121-124.
  13. Vandevyver C, Wylin T, Cassiman JJ, Raus J, Geusens P (1997) Influence of the vitamin D receptor gene alleles on bone mineral density in postmenopausal and osteoporotic women. J Bone Miner Res 12: 241-247.
  14. Lisker R, Lopez MA, Jasqui S, Ponce De Leon Rosales S, Correa-Rotter R, et al., (2003) Association of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms with osteoporosis in mexican postmenopausal women. Human biology 75: 399-403.
  15. Gross C, Eccleshall TR, Malloy PJ, Villa ML, Marcus R, (1996) The presence of a polymorphism at the translation initiation site of the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with low bone mineral density in postmenopausal Mexican-American women. J Bone Miner Res. 11: 1850-1855.
  16. Gennari L, Becherini L, Mansani R, Masi L, Falchetti A, et al., (1999) FokI polymorphism at translation initiation site of the vitamin D receptor gene predicts bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Italian women. J Bone Miner Res. 14: 1379-1386.
  17. Jia F, Sun RF, Li QH, Wang DX, Zhao F, et al. (2013) Vitamin D receptor BsmI polymorphism and osteoporosis risk: a meta-analysis from 26 studies. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 17: 30-34.
  18. Wang D, Liu R, Zhu H, Zhou D, Mei Q, et al., (2013) Vitamin D receptor Fok I polymorphism is associated with low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis focused on populations in Asian countries. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 169: 380-386
  19. MANTEL N, HAENSZEL W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22: 719-748.
  20. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: 177-188.
  21. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629-634.
  22. Özbaş H, TutgunOnrat S, Özdamar K (2012) Genetic and environmental factors in human osteoporosis. Mol Biol Rep 39: 11289-11296.
  23. Mencej-Bedrac S, Prezelj J, Kocjan T, Teskac K, Ostanek B, et al., (2009) The combinations of polymorphisms in vitamin D receptor, osteoprotegerin and tumour necrosis factor superfamily member 11 genes are associated with bone mineral density. J MolEndocrinol. 42: 239-247.
  24. Zajícková K, Zofková I, Bahbouh R, Krepelová A (2002) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, bone mineral density and bone turnover: FokI genotype is related to postmenopausal bone mass. Physiol Res 51: 501-509.
  25. Langdahl BL, Carstens M, Stenkjaer L, Eriksen EF (2002) Polymorphisms in the osteoprotegerin gene are associated with osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 17: 1245-1255.
  26. Yasovanthi J, VenkataKarunakar K, Sri Manjari K, Pulla Reddy B, Ajeya Kumar P, et al., (2011) Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with BMD and their effect on , 25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 levels in pre- and postmenopausal South Indian women from Andhra Pradesh. Clinicachimicaacta; 412: 541-544.
  27. Xing SJ, Zhang LF, Han LH, ZY C. (2011) The relationship of Vitamin D receptor gene Fokl polymorphism and osteoporosis in Inner Mongolia older women. Chinese Journal Of Gerontology 31: 2642-3.
  28. Mitra S, Desai M, IkramKhatkhatay M (2006) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and bone mineral density in postmenopausal Indian women. Maturitas 55: 27-35.
  29. Zhang ZL, Meng XW, Zhou XY (2002) Association of vitamin D receptor gene and calcitonin receptor gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density in women of the Han nationality in Beijing area. Chin J EndocrinolMetab 18: 90-4.
  30. Choi YM, Jun JK, Choe J, Hwang D, Park SH, et al. (2000) Association of the vitamin D receptor start codon polymorphism (FokI) with bone mineral density in postmenopausal Korean women. J Hum Genet 45: 280-283.
  31. Wengreen H, Cutler DR, Munger R, Willing M. (2006) Vitamin D receptor genotype and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly women of Utah: an effect modified by parity. Osteoporos Int.17: 1146-1153.
  32. Morrison NA, Yeoman R, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA (1992) Contribution of trans-acting factor alleles to normal physiological variability: vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and circulating osteocalcin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 89: 6665-6669.
  33. Uitterlinden AG, Ralston SH, Brandi ML, Carey AH, Grinberg D, et al., (2006) The association between common vitamin D receptor gene variations and osteoporosis: a participant-level meta-analysis. Annals of internal medicine 145: 255-64.
  34. Mezquita-Raya P, Munoz-Torres M, Alonso G, de Luna JD, Quesada JM, (2004) Susceptibility for postmenopausal osteoporosis: interaction between genetic, hormonal and lifestyle factors. Calcified tissue international 75: 373-9.
Citation: Zhang J, Ai Z, Ning X, Liu X, Tang W, Luo Y (2015) The Association between Vitamin D Receptor FokI Gene Polymorphism and Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis. J Osteopor Phys Act 3:143.

Copyright: © 2015 Zhang J et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top