GET THE APP

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Neuromyelitis Optica
Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology

Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9899

+44 1223 790975

Review Article - (2014) Volume 0, Issue 0

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Neuromyelitis Optica

Kazuya Takahashi*
Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Iou Hospital, Ni73-1, Iwade-machi, Kanazawa 920-0192, Japan
*Corresponding Author: Kazuya Takahashi, Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Iou Hospital, Ni73-1, Iwade-machi, Kanazawa 920-0192, Japan, Tel: +81-76-258-1180, Fax: +81-76-258-6719 Email:

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can have detrimental effects on many different systems in the body, including the central nervous system. Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) refers to several different neurological and/or behavioral clinical syndromes, and has been reported as having a prevalence rate of approximately 30−40%, while manifestation of myelitis or optic neuritis of NPSLE is rare (~1%). Myelitis and optic neuritis are easily identifiable since myelitis is frequently transverse, and manifests as severe disturbances in both motor and sensory pathways, while optic neuritis is often both bilateral and severe. At least 85% of patients experience relapses in the form of optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, or both. Furthermore, some cases of NPSLE with optic neuritis are often complicated by myelitis. Interestingly, the characteristics of myelitis or optic neuritis in NPSLE are quite similar to neuromyelitis optica (NMO), a disease characterized by bilateral optic neuropathy and transverse myelopathy. In fact, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with NPSLE has demonstrated longitudinal spinal involvement showing cord swelling and hyperintense lesions in central regions. These findings are also typically observed in MRIs of patients with NMO. Additionally, anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibodies have been discovered in patients with NMO and with NPSLE with myelitis and/or optic neuritis. Therefore, complications that are often encountered with NMO should be considered when treating cases of NPSLE with myelitis and/or optic neuritis. Moreover, since the treatment of NMO closely resembles the therapeutic approaches taken for NPSLE, corticosteroids alone or in combination with immunosuppressants could prove effective in reducing incidents of relapse. Some patients, however, may be refractory to steroid therapy; in such cases, plasma exchange may have priority over other second-line therapeutic strategies, such as intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab, because of treatment approaches typically employed in NMO. In this review, I will discuss pathological similarities between NPSLE with myelitis and/or optic neuritis and NMO with the aim of demonstrating that our knowledge of NMO should be considered when treating NPSLE with myelitis and/or optic neuritis.

Keywords: Neuropsychiatric lupus; Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody

CNS Involvement in SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can have detrimental effects on the central nervous system (CNS). Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) refers to several different neurological and/or behavioral clinical syndromes such as stroke, seizures, myelopathy, mood disorders, and cognitive impairment [1] (Table 1), and a 30–40% prevalence rate of NPSLE has recently been reported [2]. In a 3-year prospective study of 370 patients with SLE and no history of CNS complication, 16/370 patients were reported to develop major CNS-related events including myelopathy (4/16), optic neuritis (1/16), and positive neuromyelitis optica (NMO)-IgG antibodies (2/16) [3]. It has been shown that antiphospholipid antibodies including anti-cardiolipin and lupus anti-coagulant are some of the strongest NPSLE-related factors expressed especially in relation to cerebrovascular disease [4,5]. One study also reported anti-ribosomal P antibodies as risk factors for SLE psychosis [6]; however, this is inconclusive since another report showed no relation between these antibodies and neuropsychiatric illness [7]. Moreover, anti-double stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA), which are the most represented autoantibodies in SLE, are reported to cross-react with NR2A and NR2B subunits of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) [8,9]. Thus, anti-NMDAR antibodies seem to correlate with CNS manifestation of NPSLE including cognitive impairment and depression [8,9]. Recently, anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies were discovered in patients with NMO [10] and in patients with NPSLE, especially with myelitis or optic neuritis [11-13]. The relevance of this antibody will be discussed in the following section.

S.No Manifestations
1 Common (5–15% cumulative incidence)
2 Cerebrovascular disease
3 Seizure
4 Relatively uncommon (1–5%)
5 Cognitive dysfunction
6 Major depression
7 Acute confused state
8 Peripheral nervous disorders
9 Rare (<1%)
10 Psychosis
11 Myelitis
12 Chorea
13 Cranial neuropathies (including optic neuropathy)
14 Aseptic meningitis

Table 1: Major manifestations of CNS lupus [3].

Neuromyelitis Optica

NMO first described by Devic in 1894 is a disease characterized by bilateral optic neuropathy and transverse myelopathy, which can be pathologically identified by severe demyelination and necrotic changes [14]. Approximately one century after Devic’s initial report, neurologists in Western countries diagnosed severe opticomyelitis with NMO regardless of relapse status, while neurologists in Asian countries classified such cases as an opticospinal form of multiple sclerosis (OSMS) in cases of relapse and Devic’s disease in cases where a monophagic pattern emerged [15,16]. However, the discovery of NMO-IgG by Lennon et al. in 2004 caused a paradigm shift in the diagnosis and treatment of NMO [17]. In 2006, both United States and Japanese groups reported that cases of Japanese OSMS were very similar to NMO [15], and the diagnostic criteria for NMO were revised that same year [18]. Lennon et al. also found that NMO-IgG binds to a dominant water channel expressed on the foot process of astrocytes called aquaporin-4 (AQP4) [10,19,20]. As discussed, anti-AQP4 antibodies have been discovered both in patients with NMO and with NPSLE.

Optic neuritis in NMO is often both bilateral and severe [21,22] and patients of NMO with optic neuritis have a higher likelihood of permanent vision loss than patients with typical optic neuritis such as multiple sclerosis (MS) [23]. In contrast to optic neuritis, myelitis in NMO is frequently transverse, and manifests as severe disturbances in both motor and sensory pathways at the same time as the appearance of disruptions to bowel and bladder functions [24]. At least 85% of patients experience relapses in the form of optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, or both [24]. Moreover, over 50% of relapses occur in the first year, approximately 75% of relapses occur within 3 years, and 90% of relapses occur within 5 years [24]. One study investigated the spinal cord of patients with NMO using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and found that over 60% of lesions exhibited T2-hyperintense regions that comprised of more than 50% of the cord area, and that these regions were mainly located in the central grey matter [20]. In relation to other autoimmune diseases and auto-reactive antibodies, 70% of patients with NMO have at least one auto-reactive antibody (except for NMO-IgG), and thus it seems that systemic autoimmune diseases including SLE are fairly similar to NMO [25].

NMO-related Manifestations in NPSLE

Myelitis

About 1-2% of patients with SLE exhibit myelitis [26], and a retrospective study of 22 patients affected by NPSLE with myelitis reported that 20 of the 22 patients were female [27]. Interestingly, this rate is similar to the female/male ratio that has been found in cases of NMO [20]. Moreover, 50% of these patients presented with signs of impairments to gray matter as characterized by flaccidity and hyporeflexia indicating nucleus dysfunction, while the other 50% of patients presented with signs of white matter damage as characterized by spasticity and hyperreflexia indicating pyramidal tract dysfunction [27]. The patients with impaired white matter regions had a history of optic neuritis and displayed higher levels of anti-AQP4 antibodies than patients with grey matter dysfunction; however, MRIs of both groups showed long cord lesions that spanned at least three vertebral segments, indicative of NMO. In total, 50% of the patients affected by NPSLE and myelitis in their study also satisfied criteria for the NMO spectrum of disorders [27].

Optic neuritis

Optic neuropathy in NPSLE includes inflammatory optic neuritis and ischemic optic neuropathy [4]. Ischemic optic neuropathy is usually unilateral and occurs in patients with anti-phospholipid antibodies [4]. In contrast, optic neuritis is commonly bilateral in SLE [4], which results in a worse outcome compared to optic neuritis with MS. Interestingly, it has been suggested that bilateral optic neuritis and poor outcome are typically indicative of NMO. Therefore, characteristic manifestations of NPSLE also overlap with those of NMO.

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion

Seizures or acute states of confusion are canonical manifestations in NPSLE. In fact, a study in Thailand reported that about 6% of NPSLE cases presented with clinical manifestations of altered consciousness [28]. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is a hypothalamic-pituitary disease defined by hyponatremia and hypo-osmolality resulting from inappropriate continued secretion of the antidiuretic hormone despite increased plasma volume. Clinical symptoms mainly present as altered consciousness including confusion, disorientation, delirium, and generalized seizures. SLE-related SIADH is rarely reported [29] and, to our knowledge, no studies have been done to investigate the relationship between SIADH and anti-AQP4 antibodies. However, it has been reported that the hypothalamus is sometimes involved [30,31], which is an area of the brain that is known to have high levels of AQP4 expression [32] (Figure 1A and 1B).

cellular-immunology-axial-image

Figure 1: Typical MRIs of SLE with NMO. (A) T2-weighted axial images indicatehyperintense lesions in the hypothalamus (B) and periaqueductal, which highly express the aquaporin 4 molecule. (C) A T2-weighted sagittal image of the spinal cord indicates the swelling and alongitudinal lesion. (D) A T2-weighted axial image of the spinal cord indicates a hyperintense lesion in the central parts of the spinal cord.

MRIs of NPSLE with Optic Neuritis or Myelitis

Representative MRIs of patients with NPSLE have reported such changes as cerebral atrophy, ischemic changes, intracranial hemorrhage, dural venous thrombosis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, rhombencephalitis (brainstem encephalitis), infections, and myelitis [33]. Small nonspecific T2-hyperintense lesions in deep white matter are usually seen in the brains of both patients with and without NPSLE. However, T2-hyperintense lesions larger than 10 mm are typically only reported in patients with NPSLE [34]. According to myelitis, MRIs of spinal cords in patients with NPSLE have been described in several case reports showing heterogeneous findings [35]. For example, Provenzale et al. reported eight episodes of transverse myelitis in four patients and consistently observed prolonged signals on T1- or T2-weighted MRIs as well as cord enlargement in 75% of the episodes [36]. Moreover, Deodhar et al. reported the first case of SLE with longitudinal myelitis in 1999 [37] and other groups have reported MRI findings of NPSLE with longitudinal spinal involvement [38,39] (Figure 1C), many of which showed T2-hyperintense lesions in central regions of the spinal cord and cord swelling, which are the typical MRI findings in NMO (Figure 1D).

NPSLE and Anti-AQP4 Antibodies

It has been reported that anti-AQP4 antibodies can only be observed in patients with NMO spectrum disorders and not in patients with Sögren syndrome/SLE with neurological manifestations but without optic neuritis or myelitis [11]. In fact, Závada et al. demonstrated that out of 76 serum samples obtained from patients with NPSLE only one sample derived from a patient with NPSLE and transverse myelitis was positive for anti-AQP4 antibodies [12]. On the other hand, in a case report by Kolfenbach, 1/7 patients with NPSLE and transverse myelitis tested positive for anti-AQP4 antibodies [13].

Treatment

Steroid therapy such as high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone is often used to treat acute exacerbations of both NPSLE and NMO. However, some patients may be refractory to steroid therapy. In these cases, plasma exchange [40], intravenous immunoglobulin [41], and rituximab [42] have been used second-line therapeutic strategies. In cases where NMO is not responsive to steroids, plasma exchange therapy is typically selected [43-45]. Therefore, plasma exchange may have priority over other second-line therapeutic approaches in NPSLE with myelitis and/or optic neuritis. In instances of cerebrovascular disease where anti-phospholipid antibodies have been identified anticoagulation therapy is typically performed. Of note, immunomodulating agents that have been established as effective treatments for MS may severely exacerbate both NMO [46,47] and SLE [48].

Therefore, corticosteroids alone or in combination with immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide) should prove effective in reducing incidence of relapse in both NMO [49-51] and NPSLE [4,52]. As described above, treatment of NMO is very similar to that of NPSLE, and this has been demonstrated in two patients with NMO and NPSLE who were successfully treated with high-dose corticosteroid therapy following plasmapheresis with azathioprine or cyclophosphamide [53].

Conclusions

Manifestations of myelitis or optic neuritis in NPSLE are rare and display characteristic onsets. Myelitis is often transverse, recurrent, and longitudinal, while optic neuritis is usually bilateral and resistant to therapy with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone alone or in combination with immunosuppressive agents [4]. Moreover, the patients with optic neuritis are often complicated by myelitis [4]. T2-weighted MRIs of spinal cords in patients with NPSLE and myelitis often exhibit cord swelling and hyperintense signals that are localized in the central part of the spinal cord. Interestingly, the way that NPSLE manifests and the pathology that is visualized on MRIs are quite similar to the characteristics of NMO. In fact, many NPSLE cases with myelitis and/or optic neuritis are often positive for anti-AQP4 antibodies (Figure 2). Taken together this suggests that complication often encountered with NMO should be considered when treating cases of NPSLE with myelitis and/or optic neuritis [54]. Furthermore, corticosteroids alone or in combination with immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide) should prove effective in reducing incidents of relapse of both NMO and NPSLE.

cellular-immunology-optic-neuritis

Figure 2: Relationships of NPSLE, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and NMO. Among the many manifestations of NPSLE, APS with antiphospholipid antibodies is related to cerebrovascular disease in NPSLE while NMO with anti-aquaporin 4 antibodies is related to myelitis or optic neuritis.

References

  1. ACR Ad Hoc Committee on Neuropsychiatric Lupus Nomenclature (1999) The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis Rheum 42: 599-608.
  2. Fanouriakis A, Boumpas DT, Bertsias GK (2013) Pathogenesis and treatment of CNS lupus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 25: 577-583.
  3. Kampylafka EI, Alexopoulos H, Kosmidis ML, Panagiotakos DB, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, et al. (2013) Incidence and prevalence of major central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: a 3-year prospective study of 370 patients. PLoS One 8: e55843.
  4. Bertsias GK, Ioannidis JP, Aringer M, Bollen E, Bombardieri S, et al. (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus with neuropsychiatric manifestations: report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for clinical affairs. Ann Rheum Dis 69: 2074-2082.
  5. Govoni M, Bombardieri S, Bortoluzzi A, Caniatti L, Casu C, et al. (2012) Factors and comorbidities associated with first neuropsychiatric event in systemic lupus erythematosus: does a risk profile exist? A large multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study on 959 Italian patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51: 157-168.
  6. Hanly JG, Urowitz MB, Su L, Bae SC, Gordon C, et al. (2011) Autoantibodies as biomarkers for the prediction of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 1726-1732.
  7. Carmona-Fernandes D, Santos MJ, Canhão H, Fonseca JE (2013) Anti-ribosomal P protein IgG autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnostic performance and clinical profile. BMC Med 11: 98.
  8. DeGiorgio LA, Konstantinov KN, Lee SC, Hardin JA, Volpe BT, et al. (2001) A subset of lupus anti-DNA antibodies cross-reacts with the NR2 glutamate receptor in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med 7: 1189-1193.
  9. Aranow C, Diamond B, Mackay M (2010) Glutamate receptor biology and its clinical significance in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 36: 187-201, x-xi.
  10. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR (2005) IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 202: 473-477.
  11. Pittock SJ, Lennon VA, de Seze J, Vermersch P, Homburger HA, et al. (2008) Neuromyelitis optica and non organ-specific autoimmunity. Arch Neurol 65: 78-83.
  12. Závada J, Nytrová P, Wandinger KP, Jarius S, Svobodová R, et al. (2013) Seroprevalence and specificity of NMO-IgG (anti-aquaporin 4 antibodies) in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 33: 259-263.
  13. Kolfenbach JR, Horner BJ, Ferucci ED, West SG (2011) Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in patients with connective tissue disease and myelitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63: 1203-1208.
  14. Devic E (1894) Myéliteaiguëcompliquée de névriteoptique. Bull Med (Paris) 8: 1033-1034.
  15. Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Nakashima I, Fujihara K, Lennon VA (2006) OSMS is NMO, but not MS: proven clinically and pathologically. Lancet Neurol 5: 110-111.
  16. Kira J (2003) Multiple sclerosis in the Japanese population. Lancet Neurol 2: 117-127.
  17. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, et al. (2004) A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 364: 2106-2112.
  18. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66: 1485-1489.
  19. Misu T, Fujihara K, Kakita A, Konno H, Nakamura M, et al. (2007) Loss of aquaporin 4 in lesions of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Brain 130: 1224-1234.
  20. Fujihara K (2011) Neuromyelitis optica and astrocytic damage in its pathogenesis. J Neurol Sci 306: 183-187.
  21. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG (2007) The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 6: 805-815.
  22. Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Misu T, Miyazawa I, et al. (2007) Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain 130: 1235-1243.
  23. Pau D, Al Zubidi N, Yalamanchili S, Plant GT, Lee AG (2011) Optic neuritis. Eye (Lond) 25: 833-842.
  24. Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O'Brien PC, Weinshenker BG (1999) The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome). Neurology 53: 1107-1114.
  25. Takahashi K, Tanaka K (2012) Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features of multiple sclerosis with autoreactive antibodies in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. J Neuroimmunol 250: 111-114.
  26. Theodoridou A, Settas L (2006) Demyelination in rheumatic diseases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77: 290-295.
  27. Birnbaum J, Petri M, Thompson R, Izbudak I, Kerr D (2009) Distinct subtypes of myelitis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 60: 3378-3387.
  28. Kasitanon N, Louthrenoo W, Piyasirisilp S, Sukitawu W, Wichainun R (2002) Neuropsychiatric manifestations in Thai patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 20:179-185.
  29. Kengne FG, Decaux G (2006) Inappropriate secretion of ADH and central diabetes insipidus are related to antiphospholipid antibodies in SLE--case report and review of the literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 3311-3315.
  30. Nakajima H, Fujiki Y, Ito T, Kitaoka H, Takahashi T (2011) Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica presenting with syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion as an initial manifestation. Case Rep Neurol 3: 263-267.
  31. Poppe AY, Lapierre Y, Melançon D, Lowden D, Wardell L, et al. (2005) Neuromyelitis optica with hypothalamic involvement. Mult Scler 11: 617-621.
  32. Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG, Lucchinetti CF, Wingerchuk DM, Corboy JR, et al. (2006) Neuromyelitis optica brain lesions localized at sites of high aquaporin 4 expression. Arch Neurol 63: 964-968.
  33. Goh YP, Naidoo P, Ngian GS (2013) Imaging of systemic lupus erythematosus. Part I: CNS, cardiovascular, and thoracic manifestations. Clin Radiol 68: 181-191.
  34. Katsumata Y, Harigai M, Kawaguchi Y, Fukasawa C, Soejima M, et al. (2010) Diagnostic reliability of magnetic resonanceimaging for central nervous system syndromes insystemic lupus erythematosus: a prospectivecohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:11-13.
  35. Salmaggi A, Lamperti E, Eoli M, Venegoni E, Bruzzone MG, et al. (1994) Spinal cord involvement and systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical and magnetic resonance findings in 5 patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 12: 389-394.
  36. Provenzale JM, Barboriak DP, Gaensler EH, Robertson RL, Mercer B (1994) Lupus-related myelitis: serial MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15: 1911-1917.
  37. Deodhar AA, Hochenedel T, Bennett RM (1999) Longitudinal involvement of the spinal cord in a patient with lupus related transverse myelitis. J Rheumatol 26: 446-449.
  38. Téllez-Zenteno JF, Remes-Troche JM, Negrete-Pulido RO, Dávila-Maldonado L (2001) Longitudinal myelitis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging of six cases. Lupus 10: 851-856.
  39. Jacobi C, Stingele K, Kretz R, Hartmann M, Storch-Hagenlocher B, et al. (2006) Neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome) as first manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 15: 107-109.
  40. Neuwelt CM (2003) The role of plasmapheresis in the treatment of severe central nervous system neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Ther Apher Dial 7: 173-182.
  41. Milstone AM, Meyers K, Elia J (2005) Treatment of acute neuropsychiatric lupus with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG): a case report and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol 24: 394-397.
  42. Tokunaga M, Saito K, Kawabata D, Imura Y, Fujii T, et al. (2007) Efficacy of rituximab (anti-CD20) for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus involving the central nervous system. Ann Rheum Dis 66: 470-475.
  43. Keegan M, Pineda AA, McClelland RL, Darby CH, Rodriguez M, et al. (2002) Plasma exchange for severe attacks of CNS demyelination: predictors of response. Neurology 58: 143-146.
  44. Merle H, Olindo S, Jeannin S, Valentino R, Mehdaoui H, et al. (2012) Treatment of optic neuritis by plasma exchange (add-on) in neuromyelitis optica. Arch Ophthalmol 130: 858-862.
  45. Watanabe S, Nakashima I, Misu T, Miyazawa I, Shiga Y, et al. (2007) Therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange in NMO-IgG-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler 13: 128-132.
  46. Shimizu Y, Yokoyama K, Misu T, Takahashi T, Fujihara K, et al. (2008) Development of extensive brain lesions following interferon beta therapy in relapsing neuromyelitis optica and longitudinally extensive myelitis. J Neurol 255: 305-307.
  47. Min JH, Kim BJ, Lee KH (2012) Development of extensive brain lesions following fingolimod (FTY720) treatment in a patient with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler 18: 113-115.
  48. Sladkova V, Mares J, Lubenova B, Hlustik P, Kanovsky P (2011) Drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus in interferon beta-1b therapy. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 32: 4-6.
  49. Watanabe S, Misu T, Miyazawa I, Nakashima I, Shiga Y, et al. (2007) Low-dose corticosteroids reduce relapses in neuromyelitis optica: a retrospective analysis. Mult Scler 13: 968-974.
  50. Costanzi C, Matiello M, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, et al. (2011) Azathioprine: tolerability, efficacy, and predictors of benefit in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 77: 659-666.
  51. Jacob A, Matiello M, Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti C, et al. (2009) Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with mycophenolate mofetil: retrospective analysis of 24 patients. Arch Neurol 66: 1128-1133.
  52. Popescu A, Kao AH (2011) Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Neuropharmacol 9: 449-457.
  53. Polgár A, Rózsa C, Müller V, Matolcsi J, Poór G, et al. (2011) Devic's syndrome and SLE: challenges in diagnosis and therapeutic possibilities based on two overlapping cases. Autoimmun Rev 10: 171-174.
  54. Karim S, Majithia V (2009) Devic's syndrome as initial presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med Sci 338: 245-247.
Citation: Takahashi K (2014) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Neuromyelitis Optica. J Clin Cell Immunol 5:208.

Copyright: © 2014 Takahashi K. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top