GET THE APP

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children: A Study about 37 Tunisi
Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology

Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9899

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2014) Volume 0, Issue 0

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children: A Study about 37 Tunisian Cases

Thabet Y1#, Mankaï A1,2, Achour A1, Sakly W1, Trabelsi A1, Harbi A3, Amri F4, Sfar MT5 and Ghedira I1,6*
1Research unit (03/UR/07-02), Faculty of pharmacy, Monastir, Tunisia
2High School of Sciences and Techniques of Health, Tunis El Manar University, Tunisia
3Pediatric Department, Sahloul Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
4Pediatric Department, Ibn El Jazzar Hospital, Kairouan, Tunisia
5Pediatric Department, Tahar Sfar Hospital, Mahdia, Tunisia
6Laboratory of Immunology, Farhat Hached Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
#Contributed equally to this work
*Corresponding Author: Ghedira I, Laboratory of Immunology, Farhat Hached Hospital, Avenue Ibn El Jazzar, 4000 Sousse, Tunisia, Tel: (216) 73221411, Fax: (216) 73461830 Email:

Abstract

Aim: To determine the clinical and serological characteristics in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 37 patients with SLE. All patients fulfilled the ACR revised criteria for SLE and diagnosed between 1994 and 2009. Anti-nuclear antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on liver rat sections. Anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-nucleosome, anti-SSA, anti-SSB and anti- RNP antibodies were detected by ELISA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected also by IIF on Chrithidia luciliae.

Results: The most common signs were anemia (86.5%), proteinuria (73%) and malar rash (67.6%). The frequency of arthritis and photosensitivity were 45.9% and 43.2% respectively. Leucopenia, thrombocytopenia and oral ulcer were present in 37.8%, 32.4% and 18.9% of cases respectively. The frequency of discoid rash was 13.5%. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in 81.1%, anti-Sm and anti-RNP in 56.8%, anti-SSA in 43.2% and anti-SSB in 35.1%.

Conclusion: The highest frequency of childhood SLE is situated at the age of puberty. Renal disease is very frequent in paediatric SLE.

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Renal disease, Children, Tunisia

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune condition characterized by multiorgan inflammation and autoantibodies production. The course of this disease is characterized by periods of flare and remission, and inflammation can result in irreversible tissue damage, as well as premature death [1]. The etiology remains poorly understood; however, genetic and environmental factors are involved in the pathogenesis [2]. Ten to twenty percent of cases are diagnosed in the first 2 decades of life with a peak incidence at 10-14 years with female predominance, the disease is rare in children below 5 years old [3-5]. It has been suggested that children with SLE had different signs and symptoms at onset and a more severe and aggressive disease course than adult patients [6-8]. Many investigators have described the features of childhood SLE among different ethnic groups [5-20]. The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the clinical and serological characteristics of childhood SLE in the center of Tunisia.

Patients and Methods

Study population

The study cohort consisted of 37 children with SLE. All patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for SLE [21]. They were diagnosed at pediatric department of four hospitals in the center of Tunisia between 1994 and 2009. All patients were reviewed retrospectively for demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory variables. The study was approved by local Ethics Committee and all patients and/or their parents gave their informed consent.

Methods

Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) were detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on liver rat sections as described previously [22]. The anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA), anti-Sm, anti-SSA, anti-SSB and anti-RNP antibodies were detected by ELISA (ORGENTEC®, Mainz, Germany). Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected also by IIF in Chrithidia luciliae (ORGENTEC®).

Results

Out of 342 SLE patients diagnosed between 1994 and 2009, 37 were children and 18 were elderly. In this group of children, there were 28 girls and 9 boys (F/M ratio: 3.1). The mean age at diagnosis was 11.5 years (range, 9 months to 15 years) (Table 1). These patients were divided in two groups; 17 who are aged between 9 months and 12 years (45.9%), and 20 who are older than 12 years (54.1%). Figure 1 shows the distribution of SLE patients according to age and sex.

cellular-immunology-SLE-patients

Figure 1: Distribution of SLE patients according to age and sex.

  Sex-ratio F/M Mean age Age range
SLE children (n=37) 28/9=3.1 11.5 years 9 months-15 years
Age≤ 2 years (n=17) 10/7=1.4 8.3 years 9 months-12 years
Age>12 years (n=20) 18/2=9 14.2 years 13-15 years

Table 1: Patients demographic data.

Table 2 summarizes the frequencies of the clinical features of SLE. The most common sign was anemia (86.5%). The frequencies of malar rash, photosensitivity, oral ulcer and discoid rash were 67.6%, 43.2%, 18.9% and 13.5% respectively. Arthritis, neuropsychiatric, pleuritis and pericarditis were found in 45.9%, 13.5%, 10.8%, and 8.1% of cases respectively.

  N (%)
Dermatologic
Malar rash 25  67.6%
Photosensitivity 16 43.2%
Oral ulcer 7 18.9%
Discoïd rash 5 13.5%
Joint
Arthralgia 21 56.8%
Arthritis 17 45.9%
Serositis
Pleuritis 4 10.8%
Pericarditis 3 8.1%
Renal
Proteinuriaa 27 73%
 LN confirmed by renal biopsy 13 -
Class III
Class IV
4
7
-
-
 Class V 2 -
Neuropsychiatric 5 13.5%
Haematologic 35 94.6%
Anemiab 32 86.5%
Leucopoeniac 14 37.8%
Thrombocytopeniad 12 32.4%
a24-h protein excretion>0.5 g/day
bHb<12g/dl
cWBC<3.5 × 109/l
dThrombocytes<150 × 109/l

Table 2: Clinical and biological manifestations in 37 SLE patients.

ANA were detected in all patients (100%). The anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in 81.1%, anti-Sm and anti-RNP in 56.8%, anti-SSA in 43.2% and anti-SSB in 35.1% (Table 3).

Autoantibodies N %
ANA 37 100%
Anti-dsDNA 30 81.1%
Anti-Sm 21 56.8%
Anti-RNP 21 56.8%
Anti-SSA 16 43.2%
Anti-SSB 13 35.1%

Table 3: Biological findings of 37 SLE children on admission.

Twenty-seven SLE patients out of 37 had proteinuria (73%) (Table 2). Thirteen patients out of 27 with proteinuria underwent renal biopsy. According to WHO classification [23]: 7 patients out of 13 (53.8%) had class IV lupus nephritis, 4 patients had class III and 2 patients had class V nephritis (Table 2). All these patients had anti-dsDNA (100%), 69.2% had anti-Sm, 38.5% had anti-SSA, 46.2% had anti-SSB and 61.5% had anti-RNP antibodies (Table 4).

  Anti-dsDNA Anti-Sm Anti-SSA Anti-SSB Anti-RNP
Patients with lupus nephritis (n=13) 13/13
(100%)
9/13
(69.2%)
5/13
(38.5%)
6/13
(46.2%)
8/13
(61.5%)

Table 4: Frequency of auto-antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis.

Corticoids were prescribed in 78.4% of patients. In fact, cortancyl was prescribed in 73% of cases, solumedrol in 24.3% and nivaquine in 18.9%. Eight patients (21.6%) were handled with immunosuppressive therapy which was cyclophosphamide. Eight out of 37 children (21.6%) died during the course of our study. Six patients out of these were treated with only corticoid and two were treated by both corticoid and cyclophosphamide.

Discussion

In children, SLE is diagnosed most commonly in the adolescent age group and rarely occurs before the age of 5 years [4] and these founding confirm our results.

We found that the mean age of our patients was 11.5 years, our result was comparable to those found by Taddio et al. (12.7 ± 3.1), Hiraki et al. (13.1 ± 3.17), Bader-Meunier et al. (11.5 ± 2.5) and Muzaffer et al. (10.5) [9-11,13]. In addition, in our series the female to male ratio was 3.1. This result was similar to those found by Taddio et al., Hiraki et al., Bader-Meunier et al. and Mondal et al., but different to the F/M ratio (14) found by Muzaffer et al. [9-11,13,20] (Table 5). This fluctuation of results could be due to the range of age. In fact, the range in our study was 9 months to 15 years, but it was 5 to 18 years in Muzaffer’s study [13]. The youngest patient of our series who is also the youngest one in all the other series of SLE is 9 months old. In this patient, SLE was revealed by chronic lymphocytic meningitis which is a rare clinical manifestation of SLE and which appeared at the age of two months. It is important to mention that her mother had neither ANA nor clinical manifestations of SLE [24]. It has been demonstrated that SLE patients aged between 1-6 years had the highest incidence of neuropsychiatric system involvement [25].

  Present study (n=37) Muzaffer et al. [13] (n=30) Hiraki et al. [10] (N =256) Bader-Meunier et al. [11] (n=155)
F/M ratio 3.1 14 4.7 4.5
Mean age (range) 11.5 ± 3.8 (1-15) 10.5 (5-18) 13.1 ± 3.17 (3-18) 11.5 ± 2.5 (1.5-16)
Malar rash 25 (67.6%) 14 (47%) 155 (61%) 60 (39%)
Photosensitivity 16 (43.2%) - 44 (17%) 20 (13%)
Oral ulcer 7 (18.9%) 1 (3.3%) 55 (21%) 16 (10.5%)
Discoid rash 5 (13.5%) 1 (3.3%) - 10 (6.5%)
Arthritis 17 (45.9%) 22 (73%) 157 (61%) -
Pleuritis 4 (10.8%) 2 (6.7%) 30 (12%) -
Pericarditis 3 (8.1%) 3 (10%) 30 (12%) -
Proteuniria 27 (73%) 22 (73.3%) 95 (37%) LN 81 (50%)
Neuropsychiatric 5 (13.5%) 9 (30%) 14 (35%) -
Anemia 32 (86.5%) 65% 58 (23%) 42 (27%)
Leucopenia 14 (37.8%) 33% 73 (29%) 55 (35%)
Thrombocytopenia 12 (32.4%) 13% 75 (29%) 44 (28%)
ANA 37 (100%) 30 (100%) 256 (100%) -
Anti-dsDNA 30 (81.1%) (90%) 184 (72%) 144 (93%)
Anti-Sm 21 (56.8%) - 88 (34%) 33 (32%)
Anti-RNP 21 (56.8%) - 68 (27%) 36 (35%)
Anti-SSA 16 (43.2%) - 69 (27%) 34 (33%)
Anti-SSB 13 (35.1%) - 34 (13%) 20 (19%)

Table 5: Comparison of clinical and biological features of our childhood SLE patients with other cohorts.

In our study, we divided our patients in two groups; the first group includes the patients aged between 9 months and 12 years (45.9%) which correspond at the pre-puberty period, and the second group includes the patients who are older than 12 years which correspond at the age of puberty. This distinction between these two groups proves the role of hormonal factors including sexual hormones in which the production increase from puberty. In fact, the sexual hormones, especially estrogens, were implied in the induction of SLE witch explain the frequent incidence of SLE in women especially in genital activity period [26,27]. These results were confirmed in our study. In fact, we have in the first group a sex-ratio F/M = 1.4 which explain that the incidence of SLE was almost equivalent between girls and boys. However the sex-ratio in the second group was 9, it corresponds in the sex-ratio of the adult population in which the incidence of SLE was more frequent in female than in male. Nevertheless, Bader-Meunier et al. found that the F/M ratio in the first group was 5.1 and it was 4.1 in the second group. This fluctuation could be due to the large series of SLE patients in the study of Bader-Meunier et al. [11].

Regarding to the clinical manifestations, in our study, anemia was the most common sign with a rate of 86.5% which is well above the rates recorded in other series. This difference could be explained, partly, by the fact that the results of other series (33.3%, 23%, 11.1%) found by Muzaffer et al., Hiraki et al. and Taddio et al. respectively [9,10,13] incorporate hemolytic anemia while our results include all types of anemia observed in the SLE, whether hemolytic or inflammatory.

Several studies have reported that children with SLE have often an aggressive clinical course and more frequent renal involvement as compared to adults [6,7,28]. In our study, the frequency of renal disease (73%) was similar to that found by Yalaoui et al. (75%) who had studied childhood SLE in the north of Tunisia and by Muzaffer et al. (73.3%) [12,14], but a lower frequency has been found in other series [9,20]. As it has been found in other series of childhood SLE, the class IV lupus nephritis (53.8%) was the most frequent one in our patients with proteuniria and who underwent renal biopsy [13,15].

Cutaneous manifestations were malar rash (67.6%), photosensitivity (43.2%) and discoid rash (13.5%). Our results were similar to those found by Taddio et al. and Hiraki et al. [9,10]. The frequency of arthritis in our study was 45.9%. This frequency was lower than that found by Hiraki et al. (61%) and Muzaffer et al. (73%). This fluctuation could be due to the number of patients and the interval of age chosen in each study [10,13]. Pleuritis, pericarditis, oral ulcer and neuropsychiatric manifestations were rare in our study. These results were similar to those found by Muzaffer et al. [13].

The presence of ANA in the serum of our patients was the most constant biological sign; in fact it was detected in all patients (100%). The high frequency of ANA was found also in many other studies. In fact, Muzaffer et al., Hiraki et al., Yalaoui et al. and Taddio et al. found frequencies of 100%, 100%, 100% and 96% respectively [9,10,13,15]. These results confirm the importance of the detection of ANA despite their low specificity in pediatric SLE [29]. Anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibodies are more specific for SLE. The frequency of anti-dsDNA antibodies in our series was 81.1% which was similar with the frequencies found by Muzaffer et al. (90%), Taddio et al. (90%), Hiraki et al. (72%) and Yalaoui et al. (75%) [9,10,13,15]. However, the frequency of anti-Sm antibodies in our series (56.8%) was higher than that found by Hiraki et al. (34%), Bader-Meunier et al. (32%) and Taddio et al. (35%) [9-11]. This fluctuation in results could be due to the different ethnics and origins of patients in these studies. In addition, this high frequency of anti-Sm antibodies was found in other Tunisian studies [22,30]. In spite of the low specificity of anti-SSA, anti-SSB and anti-RNP antibodies in SLE, these antibodies had a high frequency in our study when compared with others. In fact, the frequency of anti-SSA antibodies in our series was 43.2% compared with 27% in the study of Hiraki et al., 33% in the study of Bader-Meunier et al. and 34% in the study of Taddio et al. [9-11]. The frequency of anti-SSB antibodies in our study was 35.1%, however, Hiraki et al. found 13%, Bader-Meunier et al. 20% and Taddio et al. 22% [9-11]. The frequency of anti-RNP antibodies in our series was 56.8%, while, it was 27% in the study of Hiraki et al. and 35% in the study of Bader-Meunier et al. [10,11].

In conclusion, this study had shown that the most common clinical features were anemia, proteinuria and malar rash. SLE should be a prominent diagnostic consideration in paediatric patients.

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by Unité de recherche: Auto-immunité et Allergie (03/UR/07-02), Faculté de Pharmacie de Monastir, Tunisia.

References

  1. Brunner HI, Silverman ED, To T, Bombardier C, Feldman BM (2002) Risk factors for damage in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: cumulative disease activity and medication use predict disease damage. Arthritis Rheum 46: 436-444.
  2. Ballestar E, Esteller M, Richardson BC (2006) The epigenetic face of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol 176: 7143-7147.
  3. Klein-Gitelman M, Reiff A, Silverman ED (2002) Systemic lupus erythematosus in childhood. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 28: 561-577, vi-vii.
  4. White PH (1994) Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus and neonatal lupus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 20: 119-127.
  5. Kamphuis S, Silverman ED (2010) Prevalence and burden of pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6: 538-546.
  6. Brunner HI, Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MD, Silverman ED (2008) Difference in disease features between childhood-onset and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 58: 556-562.
  7. Font J, Cervera R, Espinosa G, Pallarés L, Ramos-Casals M, et al. (1998) Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in childhood: analysis of clinical and immunological findings in 34 patients and comparison with SLE characteristics in adults. Ann Rheum Dis 57: 456-459.
  8. Tucker LB, Menon S, Schaller JG, Isenberg DA (1995) Adult- and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of onset, clinical features, serology, and outcome. Br J Rheumatol 34: 866-872.
  9. Taddio A, Rossetto E, Rosé CD, Brescia AM, Bracaglia C, et al. (2010) Prognostic impact of atypical presentation in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a multicenter study. J Pediatr 156: 972-977.
  10. Hiraki LT, Benseler SM, Tyrrell PN, Hebert D, Harvey E, et al. (2008) Clinical and laboratory characteristics and long-term outcome of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study. J Pediatr 152: 550-556.
  11. Bader-Meunier B, Armengaud JB, Haddad E, Salomon R, Deschênes G, et al. (2005) Initial presentation of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a French multicenter study. J Pediatr 146: 648-653.
  12. Iqbal S, Sher MR, Good RA, Cawkwell GD (1999) Diversity in presenting manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus in children. J Pediatr 135: 500-505.
  13. Muzaffer MA, Al-Mayouf SM (2011) Clinical and laboratory variables of childhood systemic lupus erythematosus in western province of Saudi Arabia. Rheumatol Int 31: 23-26.
  14. Al-Mayouf SM, Al Sonbul A (2008) Influence of gender and age of onset on the outcome in children with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol 27: 1159-1162.
  15. Yalaoui S, Gorgi Y, Meddeb S, Makni S, Lakhoua R, et al. (1993) [Lupus in children in Tunisia]. Rev Med Interne 14: 765-771.
  16. Bakr A (2005) Epidemiology treatment and outcome of childhood systemic lupus erythematosus in Egypt. Pediatr Nephrol 20: 1081-1086.
  17. Bahabri S, Sabban EA, Al Rashed A, Al-Mayouf S, Al Mazyed A, et al. (1997) Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus in 60 Saudi children. Ann Saudi Med 17: 612-615.
  18. Chemli J, Krid S, Boussetta S, Abroug S, Ben Dhia N, et al. (2007) [Lupus nephritis in childhood: clinical and evolutive study of 14 cases]. Tunis Med 85: 644-650.
  19. el-Garf A, Salah S (1990) Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus among Egyptian children. J Rheumatol 17: 1168-1170.
  20. Mondal R, Nandi M, Ganguli S, Ghosh A, Hazra A (2010) Childhood lupus: experience from Eastern India. Indian J Pediatr 77: 889-891.
  21. Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40: 1725.
  22. Ghedira I, Sakly W, Jeddi M (2002) [Clinical and serological characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus: 128 cases]. Pathol Biol (Paris) 50: 18-24.
  23. Weening JJ, D'Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, et al. (2004) The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 241-250.
  24. Chemli J, Yacoubi T, Guedira I, Jeddi M, Korbi S, et al. (2004) [Mixed connective tissue disease revealed by chronic lymphocytic meningitis in an infant]. Arch Pediatr 11: 126-129.
  25. Zhu J, Wu F, Huang X (2013) Age-related differences in the clinical characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus in children. Rheumatol Int 33: 111-115.
  26. Ketari S, Cherif O, Boussema F, Kochbati S, Ben Dhaou B, et al. (2005) [Estrogen use in systemic lupus erythematosus]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 33: 783-790.
  27. Walker SE (2001) Modulation of hormones in the treatment of lupus. Am J Manag Care 7: S486-489.
  28. Ardoin SP, Schanberg LE (2012) Paediatric rheumatic disease: lessons from SLE: children are not little adults. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8: 444-445.
  29. Livingston B, Bonner A, Pope J (2011) Differences in clinical manifestations between childhood-onset lupus and adult-onset lupus: a meta-analysis. Lupus 20: 1345-1355.
  30. Louzir B, Othmani S, Ben Abdelhafidh N; Groupe d'Etude du Lupus Erythématuex Systémique en Tunisie (2003) Le lupus érythémateux systémique en Tunisie. Etude multicentrique nationale. A propos de 295 observations. Med Interne 24: 768-774.
Citation: Thabet Y, Mankaï A, Achour A, Sakly W, Trabelsi A, et al. (2014) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children: A Study about 37 Tunisian Cases. J Clin Cell Immunol 5:192.

Copyright: © 2014 Thabet Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top