GET THE APP

Socio-economic and Health Impacts of Floods in a Trans-Himalayan
Journal of Geography  & Natural Disasters

Journal of Geography  & Natural Disasters
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0587

+44-20-4587-4809

Research Article - (2018) Volume 8, Issue 2

Socio-economic and Health Impacts of Floods in a Trans-Himalayan Ecosystem

Neelofar MR, Qadri H* and Bhat RA
Department of Environmental Science, Sri Pratap College, Cluster University, Srinagar, J&K, India
*Corresponding Author: Qadri H, Department of Environmental Science, Sri Pratap College, Cluster University, Srinagar, J&K, India, Tel: +91-9797794867 Email:

Keywords: Natural disaster; Flood; Socio-economic; Health; Psychological disorder; Srinagar

Introduction

A disaster has been defined as a disruption of human ecology that exceeds the capacity of the community to function normally [1-5]. India has a unique geophysical setting and socio economic conditions with five distinct regions, the Himalayas, the plains, the hilly parts of peninsula, the coastal zone and the deserts [6] which are highly vulnerable to different kinds of disasters [3,7-10]. Similarly, Jammu and Kashmir has a long history of disasters owing to its peculiar topography; rugged terrain, extreme weather conditions, under developed economy and the commonly occurring disasters include earthquakes, landslides, cloudbursts, avalanches and floods [11,12]. One of the commonly occurring disasters is flooding [13] which usually occurs when a river bursts its bank or when there is a great deal of heavy rainfall [14]. It has some principal types: Areal type floods can happen on flat or low lying areas when water is supplied by rainfall or snowmelts [15], riverine type floods occur in all types of rivers and mostly flash floods occur in small rivers [16,17], estuarine and coastal type occur along sea shores due to breaching of bank shores [18].

In September 2014, Jammu and Kashmir suffered from disastrous floods across many parts of its districts [19] caused by torrential rainfall coupled with rise in the levels of Jhelum River. Environmentalists have claimed deforestation in the catchment areas of rivers, unplanned construction in flood plains, rampant dumping of garbage in the rivers, weak embankments of the River Jhelum and over use of chemical fertilizers by farmers as the main and indirect causative agents of the floods in the state [20].

Study area and study sites

Srinagar city (Figure 1) has a geographical extension of 34°05´24˝N and 74°47´24˝E, average elevation of 1585 m (a.m.s.l) and is spread out in an area of 294 km² with a total human population of 1,273,312. Floods occurred in almost all parts of City centre, but the most adversely affected areas were Bemina, Rajbagh and Shivpora which were thus selected as the study sites. The study sites were inundated for a considerable period of time (25-28 days) making them suitable for conducting the survey so as to fulfill the requirements of the paper (Table 1).

geography-natural-disasters-sites

Figure 1: Geographical location of study area and study sites.

Site Name Geographical Location
Latitude (N) Longitude (E) Elevation (m) Distance From the City Centre (Km)
I. Bemina 34°04´45˝ 74°46´18˝ 1576 4
II. Shivpora 34°03´58˝ 74°49´30˝ 1592 3
III. Rajbagh 34°04´10˝ 74°49´30˝ 1592 3.2

Table 1: Geographical characteristics of study sites.

Methodology

A survey based on door to door knocking of 30% of the households was conducted at different study sites by interviewing the locals [21], considering different parameters [22], the data of which was collected with a purposefully designed questionnaire [23].

Results and Discussion

For the purpose of the paper, data regarding various parameters was collected from various sources and the following results were derived:

The data in Table 2 and Figure 2 clearly reflects that the majority of the population that received flood warning was Shivpora (83%) owing to the fact that they had stayed back till the receipt of the warning and took the warning seriously. Flood warning is a message given when there are predictions that further heavy rains are still possible and it is provided via radio stations, door knocking, announcements and telephone calls to selected residents [24]. The process of evacuation was more effective in Rajbagh (100%) out of which 40% vacated on their own to the safer places and others were evacuated by locals or rescue services. During evacuation people should usually tend to move to safer places because of the fact that their buildings would flood [24,25]. Rajbagh residents had to evacuate as their houses were inundated while as the reason behind least evacuation in Bemina (50%) was that the families stayed in the first floors which were not flooded. The rescue operations were effectively carried in Shivpora (50%) while as least help from rescue operations was provided in Bemina (13%) owing to the fact that the residents had safe upper storey’s and were relatively safer than other two areas. Emergency services are usually provided by the collaboration of government, private sectors, NGO’s [26]. Further, the pre preparedness was reported to be effective among the residents of Shivpora (33%) as they shifted their valuable possessions to higher levels, parked the vehicles to the safer areas while as the residents of Rajbagh could least to protect their homes (7%) as the water gushed their houses in late hours. Disaster pre preparedness is an initiative that is intended to increase readiness and knowledge among various stake holders regarding the risks, preventive measures and other disaster related information [27,28].

geography-natural-disasters-economic

Figure 2: Disaster response and economic loss.

S. No. Parameter Bemina Shivpora Rajbagh
1 Flood warning 40 83 16
2 Evacuation 50 86 100
3 Rescue by emergency services 13 50 17
4 Pre preparedness 25 33 07
5 Bereavement 0 0 0
6 Loss of Property and possessions 100 100 100
7 Loss of Livelihood 50 26 23
8 Restoration works 56 46 66

Table 2: Flood Preparedness and post flood response with losses suffered.

The data further reveals that there were no cases of bereavement in the study sites, the reason being healthy evacuation and least contact of individuals with the stormy whirl of flood water. All the study sites suffered from damage of property and possessions (100%) but the severity of damage was more prominent in Rajbagh as it is a high flood risk area. During floods, there is loss of material and non–material assets and the effects of damage to life and property are severe for several years, resulting in livelihood vulnerability [29,30]. The loss of livelihood was worst in Bemina (50%) as the residents owned many shops/business units in the vicinity which were completely damaged affecting them occupationally. Livelihood affects people occupationally and it comprises the assets that determine the living gained by the individual/household [31,32]. The renovation works were carried in Rajbagh on a large scale (66%) as it was worst hit during the floods, making it a necessity to initiate the restoration works at an earliest. Restoration means to jump back [33,34] and it is the adaptive capacity of individuals that enables households to learn and self-organize, which forms the core of livelihood resilience, its structure and functions [35,36].

A perusal of data in Table 3 and Figure 3 deals with the health issues faced by the flood victims and it shows that the cases of physical injuries were dominant in Bemina (15%) which included cuts, abrasion, fracture, amputation, sprains/strains. Evacuation, post flood cleaning activities and slipping into pits were the main reasons behind the occurrence of physical injuries among the individuals. Flood related injuries may occur as individuals attempt to remove themselves or their family from danger resulting mostly in strains, lacerations, abrasions or bruises [37] and the most common reasons for flood infected non-fatal injuries are cuts, falls, being struck by objects [38]. The cases of acute illness were reported to be highest among individuals of Rajbagh (11%) and it included conjunctivitis, dehydration, skin infections, fever, diarrhea, vomiting, joint or muscle pain, respiratory problems (congestion, cough, sore throat). The residents complained of these illnesses because of exposure to moulds and dampness in their buildings, unhygienic conditions, polluted water supplies, deteriorated air quality. One of the categories of diseases after a flood is bodily exposure to water which includes eye infections, respiratory illness, fungal skin diseases [39] and during the flood events earache, gastro intestinal infection, asthma, skin diseases, psychological distress are commonly seen [40]. The cases of chronic diseases were mainly prevalent in residents of Shivpora (9%) which included hyper tension and asthma. Hyper tension was reported primarily among the elderly people while as asthma was enhanced among the asthma patients, these diseases were credited to the damage faced by the people and the accumulation of dust post floods. Most of the flood associated adverse health effects are non-infectious such as injuries, skin effects, carbon monoxide poisoning and exacerbation of chronic diseases due to lack of access to health care, medication and safe drinking water [41] while as the quality of air is likely to decrease after the flood has receded leading to increasing incidences of asthma and other respiratory diseases [42].

S. No. Parameters Bemina Shivpora Rajbagh
Health Issues
1 Physical injuries 15 14 09
2 Acute illness 08 09 11
3 Chronic diseases 02 09 03
4 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 55 56 47
5 Other Psychological problems 06 60 60

Table 3: Health status of the impacted population during and after floods.

geography-natural-disasters-health

Figure 3: Impact of flood on health.

The dominant health issues during the floods was the mental ill health and it prevailed in almost all the families of the study sites with Shivpora having the maximum cases of post traumatic stress disorder (56%). It erupted due to the losses faced by the people, emotional breakdown and by the reminders of the incident. The post-traumatic stress disorder included agitated behavior, anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, sleeplessness, drug intoxication (sedatives and anti depressants), nightmares. Mental ill health is usually brought up by geographical displacement during the floods [43], anxiety is characterized by excessive worry, restlessness, irritability as well as physical symptoms [44], depression is the second most common condition to arise in the aftermath of a disaster [45] and the other factors noted in the literature includes inability to control or predict the event, the possibility that the disaster will reoccur [46]. The other psychological problems faced by the people were reported from all the study sites (60%) which included over smoking, constant thoughts of the incident and complicated grief. Psychological health effects after a flood include anxiety, depression, lethargy, sleeplessness, anger, mood swings, suicidal thoughts, alcoholism/over smoking, nightmares [47] and survivors are likely to have had a greater exposure to life threat, create additional stressors and provide a constant reminder of the incident [46].

Conclusion

The floods overall had a huge impact on livelihood, property and possessions in all the study sites which mainly erupted due to delay in issuance of flood warning or the non-serious approach of households towards any such warning, improper evacuation process, lack of rescue operations and pre-preparedness among the individuals. As far as the health is considered it was deteriorated by certain factors like dampness in buildings, contact with contamination, lack of access to health care’s and post flood cleaning activities. The health issues included physical injuries, acute illness, chronic diseases and mental ill health which were prevalent during post floods scenario. The impacts of the floods could have been lessened by issuing a timely flood warning and proper pre-preparedness plan, apt evacuation process, proper medication and a suitable management or rehabilitation plan.

References

  1. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9: 5.
  2. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441-473.
  3. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16: 253-267.
  4. Davoudi S, Shaw K, Haider LJ, Quinlan AE, Peterson GD, et al. (2012) Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? “Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Planning Theory and Practice 13: 299-333.
  5. Pillai V, Salehin M (2012) Spatial Divisions and Fertility in India. Int J Population Res.
  6. Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P, Aerts J, Bergkamp G, et al. (2007) Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society 12: 30.
  7. Mostert E, Craps M, Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management? Water International 33: 293-304.
  8. Raadgever GT, Mostert E, Kranz N, Interwies E, Timmerman JG (2008) Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: do they support adaptive management? Ecology and Society 13: 14.
  9. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, et al. (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15: 20.
  10. Rajagopalan S (2006) Silver linings: natural disasters, international relations and political change in South Asia, 2004-5. Def Secur Anal 22: 451-468.
  11. Cupp D (2015) Flooding In Kashmir Valley: Macro-economic effects of natural disaster in India. Gettysburg Economic Review 8.
  12. Tripathi P (2015) Flood Disaster in India: An Analysis of trend and Preparedness. Interdisciplinary J Contemporary Res 2: 91-98.
  13. Jones MA, Jones JL, Olsen TD (2000) Ground water flooding in glacial terrain of Southern Pudget Sound, Washington: A report, US Geological Survey.
  14. Hjalmarson HW (1984) Flash flood in Tanque Verde Creek, Tucson, Arizona. J Hydraulic Eng 110: 1841-1852.
  15. Bates BC (2008) Climate change and water. Technical paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat.
  16. Wani ZA, Ganaie AH (2017) Impact of Kashmir floods on the libraries. Collection Building 36: 69-76.
  17. Naqvi (2014) Jammu and Kashmir floods: Illegal construction is the cause: A Report.
  18. Borlée F, Yzermans CJ, Krop E, Aalders B, Rooijackers, et al. (2017) Spirometry, questionnaire and electronic medical record based COPD in a population survey: Comparing prevalence, level of agreement and associations with potential risk factors. PLOS ONE 12: e0171494.
  19. Kara IG, Gök S, Horsanli O, Zencir M (2008) A population-based questionnaire study on the prevalence and epidemiology of burn patients in Denizli, Turkey. J Burn Care Res 29: 446-450.
  20. Bergin SM, Brand CA, Colman PG,Campbell DA (2009) A questionnaire for determining prevalence of diabetes related foot disease (Q-DFD): construction and validation. J Foot Ankle Res 2: 34.
  21. Opper D, Cloke H, Parke D, Richardson PS, Theilen J (2012) The monetary benefit of early flood warning in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy 51: 278-291.
  22. Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int J Mass Emergencies and Disasters 9: 287-310.
  23. Khalid S, Shiafia A (2015) Extreme flood event: A case study on flood of 2006 and 2007 in Johon, Malaysia. Civil engineering department, Colorado State University Fort Collins.
  24. Murali H, Diaz JH, Du W (2007) Disaster preparedness: Fighting the unpredictable. Bachelor thesis organization and strategy study program.
  25. Ferreira S, Hamilton K, Vincent JR (2013) Does development reduce fatalities from natural disasters? New evidence for floods. Environ Dev Econ 18: 649-679.
  26. Tewari HR (2015) Role of government and community support, flood experience and flood education in livelihood resilience, Madhuri. J Soc & Soc Welfare 4: 101-133.
  27. Shen S, Cheng C, Yang J,Yang S (2018) Visualized analysis of developing trends and hot topics in natural disaster research. Plos One 13: e0191250.
  28. Armah FA, Odoi JO, Yawson DO, Yengoh GT, Afrifa E (2010) Mapping of noise risk zones derived from religious activities and perceptions in residential neighbourhoods in the Cape coast Metropolis, Ghana. J Envir Hazard: Human and Policy Dimensions 9: 358-368.
  29. Wu J, Han G, Zhou H, Li N (2018) Economic development and declining vulnerability to climate-related disasters in China. Environ Res Lett.
  30. Paton D, Johnston DM (2008) Structure and process in the study of disaster resilience. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  31. Hallegatte S (2017) A normative exploration of the link between development, economic growth, and natural risk. Econ Disasters Clim Change 1: 5-31.
  32. Turner BL (2010) Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainable science? Global Environ Change 20: 570-576.
  33. Cavallo E, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J (2013) Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Rev Econ Stat 95: 1549-1561.
  34. Ahern M, Kovats RS, Wilkinson P, Few R, Matthis F (2005) Global health impacts of floods: Epidemiologic evidence. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Epidemiol Rev 27: 36-46.
  35. Abaya SW, Mandere N, Ewald G (2009) Flood and health in Gambella region, Ethopia: A qualitative assessment of the strength and weakness of coping mechanisms. Glob Health Action.
  36. Few R, Ahern M, Matthies F, Kovats S (2014) Flood health and climate change: A strategic review. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
  37. Reacher M, McKenzic K, Lane C (2004) Health impacts of flooding in Lewes: A comparison of reported gastrointestinal and other illness in flooded and non flooded households. Commun Dis Public Health 7: 1-8.
  38. Baquir M, Sobani ZA, Bhamani A, Bham NS, Abid S, et al. (2011) Infectious diseases in aftermath of monsoon flooding in Pakistan. Asian pacific J tropical BioMed 2: 76-79.
  39. Liggins F (2008) Impacts of climate change India, Meteorological Office Report.
  40. Fullilovev MT (1996) Contributions from the psychology of place. Am J Psychiatry 153: 1516-1523.
  41. Foa EB, Huppert JD, Cahill SP (2006) Emotional processing theory: An update, pathological anxiety: Emotional processing in etiology and treatment.
  42. Bradley R, Greene J, Russ E, Dutra L, Westen D (2005) A multidimensional meta analysis of psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry 162: 214-227.
  43. Fullerton CS, Ursano RJ (2005) First responders: Mental health consequences of a natural disaster. Annu Rev Publ Health 28: 55-68.
  44. Tunstall S, Floyd P, George C (2006) The health effects of flooding: Social research results from England and Wales. J Water Health 4: 365-380.
Citation: Neelofar MR, Qadri H, Bhat RA (2018) Socio-economic and Health Impacts of Floods in a Trans-Himalayan Ecosystem. J Geogr Nat Disast 8: 227.

Copyright: © 2018 Neelofar MR, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top