GET THE APP

Clinical Pediatrics: Open Access

Clinical Pediatrics: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2572-0775

+44 1223 790975

Commentary - (2021)Volume 6, Issue 6

Prediction Errors at the Theta Rhythm

David John*
 
*Correspondence: David John, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toledo Medical Center, Arlington Avenue, Toledo, Ethiopia, Email:

Author info »

Description

Examining how young infants answer unexpected events is vital to our understanding of their emerging concepts about the planet around them. From a predictive processing perspective, it's intriguing to research how the infant brain responds to unexpected events because they require infants to refine their predictions about the environment. To understand prediction error processes within the infant brain, we presented 9 month old a spread of physical and social events with unexpected versus expected outcomes, while recording their electroencephalogram. We found a pronounced response within the ongoing theta wave for the processing of unexpected events, for a protracted time window scalp recorded electrodes. The condition difference within the theta wave wasn't associated with the condition difference in infants’ event-related activity to unexpected events within the negative central component, a component, which is usually analyzed in infant violation of expectation studies using electroencephalogram. These findings constitute critical evidence that the theta wave is involved within the processing of prediction errors from very early in human brain development. We discuss how the theta wave may support infants’ refinement of basic concepts about the physical and social environment. From early, human infants develop basic concepts about their physical and social environment this includes a basic understanding of numbers the properties of objects and others’ actions. Our understanding of infants’ early concepts about their environment is predicated, to an outsized extent, on violation of expectation paradigms. In violation of expectation paradigms infants are shown unexpected events, which violate their basic concepts, in contrast to expected events infants are shown a change within the number of objects behind an occlude. These unexpected events commonly increase infants’ attention. This is, for instance indicated by longer looking times. Unexpected events also motivate infants to find out about their environment, indexed by an increased exploration and hypothesis testing of objects which behaved unexpectedly from a predictive processing perspective on infant brain development violation of expectation paradigms test infants' basic predictions about physical and social events in their environment. To optimize their predictions and to scale back uncertainties, infants are thought to explore and integrate novel and unexpected information to scale back prediction errors within the end of the day which is reflected in their longer looking times or brain responses yet infant’s brain response to unexpected events isn't fully understood. supported the consideration that events that violate infants’ basic expectations elicit a prediction error and need infants to refine their predictions the violation of expectation response is very interesting to raised understand neural brain dynamics involved in prediction error processing within the infant brain Infants’ neural processing of unexpected events has formerly been investigated in terms of evoked neural responses within the scalp-recorded electroencephalogram. This research has centred on the negative component, which emerges around 400-600 m/s after stimulus onset at central recording sites, and which has been related to attention processes. However, unexpected events are related to an increased negative component. Consequently, the neural mechanisms reflected within the negative component aren't fully understood.

Author Info

David John*
 
Department of Pediatrics, University of Toledo Medical Center, Arlington Avenue, Toledo, Ethiopia
 

Citation: John D (2021) Prediction Errors at the Theta Rhythm. Clin Pediatr. 6:184.

Received: 10-May-2021 Accepted: 24-May-2021 Published: 31-May-2021 , DOI: 10.35248/2572-0775.21.6.184

Copyright: © 2021 John D. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top