GET THE APP

Normative Values of Selected Anthropometric Variables in Lagos Ni
Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research

Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0533

+44-20-4587-4809

Research Article - (2013) Volume 2, Issue 3

Normative Values of Selected Anthropometric Variables in Lagos Nigerian Population

Sonuyi AO1*, Akinpelu AO2, Odole AC2 and Akinbo SRA3
1Department of Physiotherapy, National Orthopeadic Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
2College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
3College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author: Sonuyi AO, Department of Physiotherapy, National Orthopeadic Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria, Tel: +2348023261114 Email:

Abstract

Background/Objective: Anthropometric measures are important to physical fitness and weight control programmes because adiposity indices which are often used to measure the outcomes of such programmes are derived from them. The aim of this study was to determine normative values of selected anthropometric measures of participants in Lagos, Nigeria.

Method: This cross-sectional survey involved 5342 (2741 males, 2601 females) apparently healthy individuals, aged 5-90 years who were recruited consecutively. Participants’ weight, height, waist circumference, hip circumference, percent body fat were measured using standard methods. Body Mass Index (BMI) was computed. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, percentages, percentiles, and 95% confidence interval of the distribution.

Results: The 95% confidence intervals of distribution for the entire study sample were 67.62-68.46 kg for weight, 1.65-1.66 m for height, 24.72-26.53 kg/m2 for BMI, 26.53-27.05% for percent body fat, 69.53-70.73 cm for waist circumference, 78.68-79.96 cm for hip circumference, and 0.87-0.88 for waist-hip ratio. The values for all the variables increased with age until the 60-69 years age group after which it dropped.

Conclusion: Normative values of selected anthropometric variables of Nigerians fall within the upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval of the distribution.

Keywords: Normative values; Anthropometric measures; Adiposity indices; Nigerians

Introduction

The disease risk stratification is based on anthropometric data such as weight, height, body diameters, circumferences and body mass index which are used to estimate the degree of adiposity [1,2]. Previous studies have been carried out in the first century using anthropometric measures in the estimation of various indices of adiposity [1-5]. Indices of adiposity include body mass index (BMI), weight/height, percent body fat, waist circumference, waist hip ratio. Body mass index (BMI) has been found to be a useful indicator of fatness in population studies. Man has always been concerned about his body size [6], one reason for this is probably the association between obesity and health related problems [3,7,8]. According to Meginnis and Foege, overweight and obesity accounted for approximately 300,000 deaths per year in the United States [9]. Premature death, disability, increased health care cost and lost productivity have been shown to be associated with overweight and obesity [10].

Although, there are no general values/norms for the various anthropometric measures, average values that are population specific are available [11]. Despres et al. submitted that in the African population that there are no average values (norms) for these anthropometric measures though some are available in the American population [11]. The situation appears to remain the same even now. There is hence the need to provide average values of indices of adiposity of Nigerian population as a guide in the estimation of fatness.

Materials and Methods

Five thousand three hundred and forty two (5342) participants comprised of male and female Nigerians within the age range of 5 yrs to 70 years and above were involved in this study. The participants were consecutively recruited from three Local Government Areas (Ifako-Ijaiye, Ikeja, and Somolu) in Lagos (one of the largest cities in Nigeria). The following anthropometric measures and indices of adiposity of participants were measured: weight, height and waist and hip circumferences.

The study was approved by the UI/UCH Institutional Review Committee. All adult participants gave consent after detailed explanation of the procedure to them while parents or guardians gave informed consent on behalf of participants under 18 years of age.

Procedure

(a) Demographic data: Age, gender and state of origin were collected on each subject.

(b) Weight: Each subject with minimal clothing on stood barefooted on the weighing scale, looking straight ahead. The weight was recorded to the nearest 1.0 kg [12].

(c) Height: Each subject stood barefooted, with the heels together, knees extended and the back against the scale, while looking straight ahead, without any head cover. The-horizontal projection of the height meter was adjusted to touch the vertex without undue pressure [12]. The weight was recorded in centimeters to the nearest 0.1 cm.

(d) Percent body fat: This was analyzed using a non-invasive, indirect, relatively easy means of estimating percent body fat. It requires simple inexpensive instrument which demands little handling. The bioelectrical impedance analysis is based on the concept that electrical flow is facilitated through hydrated fat-free body tissue and extracellular water compared to fat tissue [13]. This is due to the greater electrolyte content, and thus lower electrical resistance of the fat-free component. An example of bioelectrical impedance analysis is the Omron BF 306. This is a simplified instrument with a small computer microprocessor which computes the percent body fat after it has been fed with the weight, height, sex and age of the individual. The individual, after taking off all metal objects on him or her, stands erect with the two feet together and holding the machine with both arms stretched forward at the shoulder, a painless, localized electrical signal is introduced and the impedance or resistance to current flow is determined. The apparent advantage of this method over skin fold measurement is that it is less prone to rater’s error.

(e) Waist Circumference: The waist circumference was taken with the subject in standing position (erect posture) using a tape measure. Measurement was taken mid-way between the lowest rib and the iliac crest at the end of gentle expiration, without compressing the soft tissues. Measurement was taken to the nearest 0.1cm [14].

(f) Hip circumference: The hip circumference was taken with the subject standing erect while keeping the feet together. A tape measure was used to measure the circumference around the fullest part of the glutei Measurement was taken to the nearest 0.1 cm [14].

(g) Waist/Hip ratio: This was obtained by expressing the circumferences of waist and hip in the ratio.

The participants were recruited into each of the following age groups, <10 years, 10-19 years, 20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years, 60-69 years and 70+ years [15]. Descriptive statistics of mean, standard deviation, percentages, and 95% confidence interval of distribution were used to analyze each of the height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, body mass index, waist/hip ratio and percentage body fat in the different age groups. Independent z-test was used to compare each of the height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, body mass index, waist/hip ratio and percentage body fat in male and female participants in the different age groups. Level of significance was set at 0.05.

Socio demographic data and physical characteristics of participants

A total of 5342 residents of Ikeja, Lagos state participated in the study. They comprised of 2741 (51.3%) males and 2601 (48.7%) females. Their ages ranged from 5 years to 90 years. The geopolitical distribution of the participants indicated that participants were from all the geopolitical zones in Nigeria. The frequency of distribution of participants in the eight age groups is shown in Table 1. The highest number of participants was in the 20-29 years age group with 1869 (35.0%); with 1342 (2.5%) of the participants in the youngest age group <10 years with 55(1%) of the participants in the older 70 years and above age group.

Variable Category N %
Sex Male 2741 51.3
  Female 2601 48.7%
Age group <10 135 2.5
  10-19 463 8.7
  20-29 1869 35.1
  30-39 1156 21.6
  40-49 572 10.7
  50-59 707 13.2
  60-69 386 7.2
  70± 55 1

Table 1: Socio Demographic Data of Participants

Results

Anthropometrics measures of participants by Sex and age group. The mean weight of the participants was 66.04 ± 15.60 kg. The mean was higher for male participants (69.54 ± 14.29 kg) than the female (66.46 ± 16.73 kg). The peaked between age group 70 years and above for female (86.36 ± - 41.20 kg), and 60-69 years (78.14 ± 10.58 kg) for the male participants (Table 2 and 3). The mean height of the participants was 1.66 ± 0.012 m. The mean for male (1.69 ± 0.001 m) was higher than the female participants (1.61 ±-0.0012 m). The mean peaked within the age group of 30-39 years (1.72 ± 0.09 m) for the males, and age group 50-59 years (1.66 ± 0.07 m) for the females.

Variable All Participants Participants Mean ± S.D by Sex
  Mean ± S.D Males Females
Weight (kg) 68.04 ± 15.60 69.54 ± 14.29 66.46 ± 16.73
Height (m) 1.66 ± 0.00 1.69 ± 0.01 1.61 ± 0.12
Hip circumference (cm) 79.33 ± 23.83 86.14 ± 15.58 72.14 ± 28.47
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.781 ± 4.97 24.15 ± 4.31 25.15 ± 5.50
Waist circumference (cm) 70.13 ± 22.21 77.45 ± 15.66 62.42 ± 25.27
Waist hip ratio 0.88 ± 0.08 0.89 ± 0.07 0.87 ± 0.09
Percent body (%) fat 26.79 ± 9.70 21.82 ± 8.32 32.11 ± 7.82

Table 2: Mean Values of Anthropometric Variables of Participant Key: SD – Standard deviation.

Age group percent (years) Weight π±SD (kg) Height π±SD (m) HipCircumBMI
(cm) π±SD kg/m2
Waist Circum Waist/Hip ratio π±SD % Body ft
<10 26.69± 7.19 1.30± 0.12 67.76 ± 8.91 15.49± 2.01 54.3± 6.34 0.81 ± 0.06  
10-19 52.50 ± 15.07 1.06 ± 0.15 76.06 ± 18.00 21.02 ± 5.30 63.24 ± 16.45 0.84 ± 0.07 20.00 ± 8.83
20-29 64.42 ± 10.96 1.67 ± 0.10 76.18 ± 23.12 23.26 ± 3.93 55.28 ± 17.42 0.86 ± 0.08 23.58 ± 2,02
30-39 72.50 ± 12.47 1.67 ± 0.09 73.01 ± 27.12 26.04 ± 4.56 65.70 ± 22.12 0.89 ± 0.09 28.63 ± 9.60
40-49 75.80 ± 12.87 1.67 ± 0.09 85.68 ± 25.33 27.29 ± 4.84 77.74 ± 22.94 0.90 ± 0.80 29.91 ± 9.38
50-59 76.29 ± 11.21 1.68 ± 0.07 90.77 ± 18.22 27.44 ± 4.34 82.91 ± 19.24 0.92 ± 0.06 31.27 ± 7.28
60-69 77.49 ± 11.35 1.68 ± 0.08 90.37 ± 18.22 27.34 ± 4.18 83.58 ± 16.47 0.93 ± 0.07 30.14 ± 7.16
70± 76.02 ± 27.98 1.57± 0.35 83.80± 21.12 24.86 ± 3.85 77.03 ± 15.73 0.95 ± 0.08 26.98 ± 7.56
Total 68.04 ± 15.60 1.66 ± 0.12 80.45 ± 19.65 24.86 ± 5.10 69.95 ± 20.47 0.88 ± 0.48 26.7 ± 5.1

Table 3: Mean Values of Anthropometric Variables of Participants by Age Group

The mean hip circumference of participants was 79.33 ± 23.83 cm. The mean hip circumference of the male participants (86.14 ± 15.58 cm) was higher than the female participants (72.14 ± 28.47 cm). The mean peaked between 50-59 years age group (90.82 ± 21.25 cm) for the female, and age group 60-69 years (91.28 ± 10.82) for the male participants. The mean BMI of participants was 24.81 ± 5.01 kg/m2. The mean for the female participants (25.67 ± 5.54 kg/m2) was higher than the male participants (24.23 ± 4.56 kg/m2).

The mean peaked between age group 40-49 years (28.71 ± 4.87 kg/m2) for the female participants, and in age group 50-59 years (26.87 ± 3.372 kg/m2) for the male participants. The mean waist circumference for the participants was 70.l3 ± 22.2l cm. The mean waist circumference was higher in the male participant (77.45 ± 15.66 cm) than the female participants (62.42 ± 25.27 crn). The mean peaked between the age group 50-59 years (81.31 ± 19.24 cm) for the female participants, age group 70 years and above (8 7.44 ± 10.97 cm) for the male age group, Table 4.

Age Group years Weight Lower Bound Upper bound Height Lower Bound Upper Bound Hip Circum. Lower Bound Upper Bound BMI Lower Bound Upper Bound % Body Fat Lower Bound Upper Bound Waist Circum. Lower Bound Upper Bound Waist/Hip Lower Bound Ratio Upper Bound
<10 25.47 27.92 1.28 1.32 66.26 69.26 15.16 15.82 - - 53.25 55.47 0.72 0.82
10-19 51.13 53.88 1.59 1.61 74.42 77.71 20.55 21.51 19.20 20.80 62.30 65.18 0.83 0.85
20-29 63.92 64.92 1.66 1.67 75.18 77.23 23.11 23.14 23.14 24.20 64.45 66.37 0.85 0.86
30-39 71.78 73.22 1.67 1.68 71.40 74.63 25.80 26.32 28.05 29.18 63.74 66.71 0.89 0.90
40-49 74.75 76.86 1.66 1.68 83.60 87.76 26.93 27.73 29.14 30.68 76.00 79.83 0.90 0.92
50-59 75.46 77.12 1.67 1.68 89.42 92.11 27.12 27.76 30.74 31.80 81.56 84.06 0.90 0.91
60-69 76.35 78.62 1.68 1.70 88.82 91.92 26.92 27.76 29.43 30.85 82.96 86.04 0.92 0.94
70± 68.46 83.59 1.48 1.66 78.09 89.50 22.77 25.10 25.00 28.98 75.56 84.93 0.94 1.04
Overall 95%C: 67.62 68.46 1.65 1.66 78.68 79.96 24.72 25.00 26.53 27.05 69.53 70.73 0.87 0.88

Table 4: 95% Confidence interval of distribution for Anthropometric measures of Participants

The mean waist-hip ratio for the participants was 88 ± 0.8 cm. The mean waist hip ratio was higher in the male participants (0.89 ± 0.07) than in the female participants (0.87 ± 0.09). The mean peaked between age group 70 years and above (0.96 ± 0.07 1.04 ± 0.32) in both male and female participants respectively. The mean percent body fat for age group <10 years is not included in the Table 4, the 10-19 years age group involved only ages 18-19 years. The mean percent body fat for the participants was 26.79 ± 9.70%. The mean percent body fat was higher in the female participants (32.19 ± 7.88% vs 21.80 ± 8.47%). The mean peaked between age group 40-49 years (35.58 ± 7.51%) for the females; and age group 60-69 years (28.2 ± 6.03%) for the male participants.

Discussion

Anthropometric parameters such as weight, height, body diameters and circumferences have been used to enumerate the degree of fatness or adiposity [16]. In this study the male participants (2741) were slightly more than the female participants (2601). The people were generally interested in knowing the values of their anthropometric measures, though the females were slightly reluctant in putting off their clothes especially for the measurement of waist and hip circumferences. The youngest age group (<10 years) and the oldest age group (70 and above) were few, this may be due to the fact that most of the parents of the younger age group were reluctant to give consent for their children and the older group were not readily available. The sample size had a representation of participants from all the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria, Lagos being a cosmopolitan city.

Obesity as assessed by indices of adiposity for example BMI and waist circumference is clearly associated with significant morbidity and mortality and the prevalence of obesity has risen dramatically and continues to rise in the United States and around the world [17]. Balogun et al. concluded that weight was a more important determinant of blood pressure than age in the Nigerian population [18]. Sayannwo et al. carried out a cross-sectional survey of the population of Gassim of Saudi Arabia and computed the BMI of 6044 individuals [19]. Anthropometric studies have also been carried out on the Nigerian population. The height of 1242 Urban Nigerians above 10 years ranged from 142 cm to 162 cm and their weight ranged from 33.6 kg to 63.6 kg [20]. Anthropometric survey of Nigerian farmers in the south eastern zone of Nigeria to obtain information on body dimensions that may be used in ergonomic design of farm equipment was carried out by Onuoha [21]. Studies on anthropometric measures and indices of adiposity of a large population of Nigerian participants were not available. Mean weight was higher in male participants than the female participants. The mean height was higher in the male participants than the female participants. Waist circumference was higher in the male participants that the female participants. Hip circumference was higher in the male participants than female participants. The mean BMI and percent body fat were higher in the female participants than the male participants especially in the age groups 30-39 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years which essentially represent the middle age spread period in the females when they usually accumulate fat. Currently Body mass index (BMI) is most commonly used to determine adiposity [22].

Comparing the BMI values of this study with WHO BMI cut off Table 4, (Overweight - > 25, Obese -25:00 – 29:99) [23]. Overall 95% confidence interval of this study is 24:72 – 25:00.

Percent body fat is the percentage of fat relative to total body weight [22]. The 95% confidence interval of distribution of percentage body fat in this study, when compared with WHO recommendation [23,24], shows Nigerians could be in the healthy range. Waist circumference, waist/hip ratio as indices of adiposity are not greatly influenced by height, central fat (abdomen and trunk) increases the risk of cardiovascular problems than peripheral fat [2]. This has made waist circumference important in estimating indices of adiposity. In the American population, waist/hip ratio value exceeding 0.95 for males and 0.80 for females are considered obese [25]. Waist Circumference has been shown to be well correlated with abdominal and visceral adiposity [26], and abdominal adiposity and increased waist circumference especially greater than 100 cm, have been shown to be highly correlated with risks of cardiovascular disease [27]. Participants within this study with waist circumference greater than 100 cm may hence be at risk of cardiovascular diseases. The waist circumference at overall 95% confidence interval by distribution was 69.53 in the lower bound and 70.73 cm in the upper bound. The waisthip ratio at 95% confidence interval by distribution was 0.87 in the lower bound and 0.88 in the upper bound. These values are different from the values from the WHO Monica project by Molarius et al. on varying sensitivity of waist action levels; to identify participants with overweight or obesity in 19 populations [27]. This may be due to the fact that these values are influenced by race and culture [27]. There is a general drop in all the values of anthropometric measures except in the waist-hip ratio in the age group 70 years and above. This may imply that the anthropometric measures are low in this age group. When the general trend was compared with other populations, it was found that BMI of Nigerian participants were higher in women than men, like the BMI of the Saudi’s [19]. The British population was the reverse with men with higher values than women [28].

In this study, mean values of anthropometric measures varied with age. The general trend of gradual increase in BMI and percent body fat from age group <10 years to 50-59 year age group and decrease from 60-69 age group to 70 and above age group could be due to the life style (eating habits and sedentary habits) of the people.

Conclusion

Normative values of selected anthropometric variables of Nigerians fall within the upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval of the distribution. The male participants had higher weight, height, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio and waist circumference, while the female had higher BMI and percent body fat. All anthropometric measures were lowest for the <10 year age group, increased steadily thereafter and dropped at the 70+ age group. The values of this study can serve as a data for the Nigerian population.

The survey can be a guide in standard examination procedures, analysis and evaluation, especially in fitness and weight control programs of Nigerians. It can be a guide for health practitioners to compare clinical data of patients to those of healthy persons. The normative data can be useful in reducing the risk of improper examination interpretation.

It is recommended that studies of similar large samples on the anthropometric measures of Nigerians (urban and rural) be carried out in other parts of the country.

References

  1. Lichtash CT, Cui J, Guo X, Chen YD, Hsueh WA, et al. (2013) Body adiposity index versus body mass index and other anthropometric traits as correlates of cardiometabolic risk factors. PLoS One 8: e65954.
  2. Kesavachandran CN, Bihari V, Mathur N (2012) The normal range of body mass index with high body fat percentage among male residents of Lucknow city in north India. Indian J Med Res 135: 72-77.
  3. Richard JW (1997) The New complete Medical and Health Encyclopedia 6lh ed. Chicago 1997. Ferguson Publishing Company 3: 892.
  4. Villareal DT, Apovian CM, Kushner RF (2005) Obesity in older adults: technical review and position statement of the American Society of Nutrition 82: 923-934.
  5. Patsy BR (1981) Table of Weight by Height of Children and Youths. Nutrition and applied Science. 2nd ed, St Paul, New York, San Francisco West Publishing companies.
  6. Tucker LA (1982) Relationship between somatotype and body cathexis of college males. Psychological report 50: 983-989.
  7. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, Stevens J, VanItallie TB (1999) Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA 282: 1530-1538.
  8. Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE, Nichaman MZ, Gibbons LW, et al. (1999) Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men. JAMA 282: 1547-1553.
  9. Mcginnis JM, Foege WH (1994) Actual causes of death in United States JAMA 271: 660.
  10. Faith MS, Pietrobelli A, Nuñez C, Heo M, Heymsfield SB, et al. (1999) Evidence for independent genetic influences on fat mass and body mass index in a pediatric twin sample. Pediatrics 104: 61-67.
  11. Després JP, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, et al. (1990) Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease. Arteriosclerosis 10: 497-511.
  12. Willet W (1990) Nutriyional epidermiology. Oxford University press Inc. pp217-219.
  13. Abu Khaled M, McCutcheon MJ, Reddy S, Pearman PL, Hunter GR, et al. (1988) Electrical impedance in assessing human body composition: the BIA method. Am J Clin Nutr 47: 789-792.
  14. Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE (1995) Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ 311: 158-161.
  15. United Nations (1982) Provisional guidelines on standard international age classifications. Statistical papers Series M, No74.
  16. Lean ME, Han TS, Seidell JC (1998) Impairment of health and quality of life in people with large waist circumference. Lancet 351: 853-856.
  17. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, et al. (2001) The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA 286: 1195-1200.
  18. Balogun JA, Obajuluwa VA, Abereoje OK, Olaogun MO, Oyeyemi AY, et al. (1990) Anthropometric determinants of resting blood pressure and heart rate of Nigerian school children. Ann Trop Paediatr 10: 425-431.
  19. Soyannwo MA, Kurashi NY, Gadallah M, Hams J, el-Essawi O, et al. (1998) Body mass index (BMI) in the Saudi population of Gassim. Afr J Med Med Sci 27: 117-121.
  20. Johnson TO (1970) Height and weight patterns of an urban African population sample in Nigeria. Trop Geogr Med 22: 65-76.
  21. Onuoha SN (2013) Anthropometry of south eastern Nigeria agricultural workers. I JET.
  22. Shah NR, Braverman ER (2012) Measuring adiposity in patients: the utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin. PLoS One 7: e33308.
  23. WHO Expert Consultation (2004) Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 363: 157-163.
  24. Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, Jebb SA, Murgatroyd PR, et al. (2000) Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr 72: 694-701.
  25. Singh SP, Sikri G, Garg MK (2008) Body mass index and obesity: Tailor “cut off” for an Asian population. Med J Armed India 64: 350-353.
  26. Larsson B, Svärdsudd K, Welin L, Wilhelmsen L, Björntorp P, et al. (1984) Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow up of participants in the study of men born in 1913. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 288: 1401-1404.
  27. Molarius A, Seidell JC, Sans S, Tuomilehto J, Kuulasmaa K (1999) Varying sensitivity of waist action levels to identify subjects with overweight or obesity in 19 populations of the WHO MONICA Project. J Clin Epidemiol 52: 1213-1224.
  28. White A, Nicolas G, Foster K, Browne F, Carey S (1993) Health Survey for England 1991: London: 11MSO.
Citation: Sonuyi AO, Akinpelu AO, Odole AC, Akinbo SRA (2013) Normative Values of Selected Anthropometric Variables in Lagos Nigerian Population. Orthop Muscul Syst 2: 133.

Copyright: © 2013 Sonuyi AO. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top