GET THE APP

Essential Oil Variability in Natural Hahadjerine Population of Cu
Forest Research: Open Access

Forest Research: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2168-9776

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2012) Volume 1, Issue 1

Essential Oil Variability in Natural Hahadjerine Population of Cupressus dupreziana in Tassili Ajjer (Algeria)

M Ramdani1*, T Lograda1, P Chalard2, G Figueredo3, JC Chalchat2 and A Zeraib1
1Laboratory of Natural Resource Valorization, Sciences Faculty, Ferhat Abbas University, 19000 Setif, Algeria, E-mail: T_Lograda@gmail.com
2Ecole nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Clermont Ferrand, Laboratoire de Chimie des Hétérocycles et des glucides, EA987, 63174 Aubière Cedex 01, France, E-mail: T_Lograda@gmail.com
3LEXVA Analytique, 460 rue du Montant, 63110 Beaumont, France, E-mail: T_Lograda@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author: M Ramdani, Laboratory of Natural Resource Valorization, Sciences Faculty, Ferhat Abbas University, 19000 Setif, Algeria, Tel: +213 36 83 58 94, Fax: +213 36 93 79 43 Email:

Abstract

Essential oils extracted from dried leaves of Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus, an endemic species in the Tassili n’Ajjer (Sahara Central Algeria), were analysed by gas chomatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Terpinoid analyses were performed on 13 trees in the natural population of Hahadjerine in order to determine the intra-population variability. 39 trepenoids were identified; the averages of the principal components were trans- totarol (24.4%), Manoyl oxide (21.2%), α-pinene (15%) and Δ3-carene (11.3%). The terpenoid markers used made it possible to determine the individual patterns of chemotypic variability. This variability confirms that genetic factors are not solely responsible for the decrease in the numbers of this species.

<

Keywords: Cupressaceae; Cupressus dupreziana; Genetic variability; Tassili n’Ajjer; Terpenoïds

Introduction

Tassili n’Ajjer is an ecosystems significant and fragile, situated in the south arid zones of Algeria (Sahara central). The Tassili n’Ajjer (National Park) protected area covers a total area of 72.000 km2. The climate is hyper-arid, characterised by extreme meteorological variability and uncertainty. Mean annual rainfall ranges from 20 mm to 100mm, with marked variations across years and seasons. Precipitation may be absent for several years at a given location. The absolute temperatures may range from -7°C to 50°C. The biodiversity inventory is far from complete and data on the distribution and status of most taxa require urgent updating.

The Cupressus, family Cupressaceae, is represented in Algeria by one widely endemic species found in the south of the country, namely in Tassili n’Ajjer. C. dupreziana A. Camus is a rare plant, which occurs in very dry regions, and is listed by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources as an endangered species [1]. The climatic conditions, as well as human activities, seem to be the main factors reducing the diversity of this species.

A critical botanical review of this species has been made by Barry et al. [2]. Phytochemical investigations of C. dupreziana have been carried by [3-7]. The study on seven French cultivars of Cupressus gives an interesting essential oil composition including α-pinene, Δ3-carene, sabinene, limonene and α-cadinol [8].

The dominant compound of C. sempervirens essential oil is the α-pinene [9]. The dominance of α-pinene, in C. sempervirens, is confirmed in addition to the sabinene and terpinene-4ol [10]. The α-pinene and Δ3-carene are the major components of C. dupreziana [11-12]. The analysis of the samples of botanical garden of Algiers shows that C. dupreziana and C. sempervirens have the same major compounds, α-pinene and Δ3-carene [11]. Several genetic studies on the species are currently being conducted [13-16].

The aims of study were linked to provide data that have always been rare; provide information on the chemical composition and search for variability within populations; fill gaps on natural populations of this species, because most previous studies have used botanical gardens samples.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

The aerial parts of C. dupreziana were collected from the Tassili n’Ajjer in Hahadjerine locality in april 2009. A voucher specimen is deposited in the Herbarium of the Sciences Faculty of Ferhat Abbas University (Algeria). Leaves and branches were dried at room temperature for 7 days, and used for analyses. The study is based on the analysis of a random sample of green branchlets of 13 trees from Hahadjerine population in Tassili n’Ajjer (Figure 1).

forest-research-open-access-Wadi-Tassili

Figure 1: Location of individuals of Cupressus dupreziana in the Hahadjerine Wadi of Tassili n’Ajjer.

Essential oil analysis

The essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation of dried plant material using a Clevenger-type apparatus for 3 h. The oils were stored in sealed glass vials at 4-5°C prior to analysis. Yield based on dry weight of the sample was calculated. The essential oil were analysed on a Hewlett-Packard gas chromatograph Model 5890, coupled to a Hewlett-Packard MS model 5871, equipped with a DB5 MS column (30m X 0.25mm; 0.25μm), programming from 50°C (5 min) to 300°C at 5°C/mn, 5 min hold. Helium as carrier gas (1,0ml/min); injection in split mode (1: 30); injector and detector temperature, 250 and 280°C respectively. The MS working in electron impact mode at 70 eV; electron multiplier, 2500 V; ion source temperature, 180°C; mass spectra data were acquired in the scan mode in m/z range 33-450.

The compounds assayed by GC in the different essential oils were identified by comparing their retention indices with those of reference compounds in the literature and confirmed by GC-MS by comparison of their mass spectra with those of reference substances [17-19].

Statistical analysis

16 terpenoïds were obtained in sufficiently large quantities to be able to perform statistical analysis [20]. Data were first subjected to Principal Components Analysis (PCA) to examine the relationships among the terpenes compounds and identify the possible structure of the population. Cluster analysis (UPGMA) was carried out on the original variables and on the Manhattan distance matrix to seek for hierarchical associations among the populations. Statistical analyses were carried out using STATISTICA 9 software.

Results

This study included the natural Hahadjerine population, with 13 trees, in Tassili n’Ajjer. The average oil yield of the different trees was found to be 0.3%. The composition of the oils from the trees of Hahadjerine population differed only quantitatively. The general chemical profiles of the tested oils and the percentage content of the individual compounds are summarized in Table 1.

Compounds
Trees
Moy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  
α-pinene 13.0 8.1 9.7 9.5 11.1 10.6 11.7 9.8 11.7 9.8 14.2 11.2 15.8 11.2
Fenchene 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Sabinene 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
β-pinene 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3
Myrcène 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6
Δ3-carene 8.6 8.6 7.5 6.1 7.1 7.7 13.6 7.9 12.6 7.3 4.1 6.6 10.4 8.3
Para cymene 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Limonene 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.2 0.1 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5
β-phellandrene 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Terpinolene 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6
Terpinene-4-ol 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
α-terpineol 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Terpinen-4-yle acetate 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
α-terpenyle acetate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1
β-caryophyllene 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.2
α-humulene 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2
γ-muurolene 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.2
Germacrene-D 2.5 1.7 5.0 4.4 2.9 2.5 3.5 2.3 4.5 4.7 9.9 4.3 4.7 4.1
α-muurolene 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
γ-cadinene 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2
Δ-cadinene 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.4
Caryophyllene oxyde 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Epi-cedrol 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.1 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4
Torrilenol 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2
β-acorenol 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1
Epi-α-cadinol 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
Epi-α-muurolol 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1
α-cadinol 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.3
Eudesma-4(15),7-dien-3-β-ol 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1-β-ol 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3
Ent-pima-8(14),15-diene 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5
Manoyl oxyde 13.2 10.7 10.2 17.7 18.7 20.0 15.6 20.3 12.1 12.2 15.6 21.3 21.0 16.0
Isopimaradiene 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.5 2.2 0.9 0.9 1.5 2.3 1.8 1.5
13-epimanoyl oxyde 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Ar-abietatriene 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
2-hydroxy-12-methoxy-19-norpodocarpa-4, 8,11,13-tetra-3-one 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 0.6 0.4 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.0
Unk 01 2.7 1.3 5.5 5.2 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.3 3.2 3.6 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.4
Totarol 14.5 10.6 20.5 25.6 22.8 21.7 15.0 19.1 14.3 16.2 21.0 20.8 17.7 18.4
Ferruginol 3.7 0.6 5.6 0.4 6.0 5.6 0.4 4.9 4.1 5.2 5.7 4.7 4.5 3.9
Unk 02 1.4 1.0 2.2 4.3 3.2 3.1 1.7 2.7 1.4 2.1 4.1 3.4 0.0 2.3
Unk 03 2.2 35.0 14.0 5.2 7.0 5.0 6.7 8.5 11.7 24.2 6.2 6.7 0.0 10.2
Total                           87.4

Table 1: Chemical composition of essential oils of Hahadjerine population of Cupressus dupreziana.

39 compounds were separated by GC-MS and characterized, with varied concentrations, particularly trans-totarol (19.1-33.5%), Manoyl oxide (14.1-26%), α-pinene (12.4-19.7%) and Δ3-carene (8-17.7%). The average of the remaining compounds is low, such as germacrene-D (5.3%), Ferruginol (5.2%), cis-totarol (4.5%), isopimaradiene (2%) and 2-hydroxy-12-methoxy-19 -norpodocarpa-4,8,11,13-tetra-3-one (1.3%). Analyses revealed the presence of intra-population variability. The components identified (α-pinene, Δ3-carene, germacrene-D, manoyl oxyde, cis and trans-totarol and ferruginol) show significant terpinoids variability (Figure 2). The compounds found in the Hahadjerine cypress generally resembled those previously reported to occur in some of cypress species [22-25]. In particular, α-pinene and Δ3-carene were present in high relative levels. The only exception was the tree 11 which contains a low rate of Δ3-carene, similar rate observed in several North American species of Cupressus [26].

forest-research-open-access-Chemical-Variability

Figure 2: Chemical Variability of main compounds of Cupressus dupreziana.

The principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the correlations between the 16 variables presented three axes comprising 76.19% of the total variation present in the original data. This analysis clustered populations in several groups, but the separation of populations is not clear. The ordination of population’s means obtained for the three vectors is shown in (Figure 3).

forest-research-open-access-principal-axes

Figure 3: Ordination of the first three principal axes of Hahadjerine population.

All individuals of this population have showed high α-pinene and trans-totarol levels and low quantitative variations in all their components. Mono and sesquiterpenoids variability reflects the heterogeneity of the genetic structure of Hahadjerine population [21].

Genetic analyses were carried out using 16 terpinoids including some compounds that have been shown in other species of Cupressus to be under the control of single locus with two alleles. The dendrogram based on UPGMA clustering (Manhattan distance), shows the presence of many groups (Figure 4) that confirms result obtained from ACP analyses.

forest-research-open-access-Manhattan-similarity

Figure 4: Dendrogram based on Manhattan similarity distance.

The first group formed by individuals (1, 13, 2, 7 and 9), rich in myrcene, Δ3-carene, limonene, terpinolene and manoyl oxyde. The second group is divided into two groups, one formed by individuals (3, 10 and 11) rich in cis-totarol and germacrene-D, while the other includes individuals (4, 5, 6, 8, and 12) characterized by components manoyl oxyde and trans-totarol. Aggregation of Hahadjerine population trees into small groups is an indication of terpenoids variability in this population. The diversity of the terpinoids contents reflects the existence of considerable genetic variability [27,28]. The UPGMA analysis of terpene traits confirms this variability, but no clear conclusions can be transmitted between individuals’ geographic distribution and genetic structure.

In brief, essential oils analysis carried out on 13 individuals of C. dupreziana showed both intra-population variability in their terpenoid content, with abundance of trans-totarol, Manoyl oxide, α-pinene, Δ3- carene and germacrene-D.

This study included the natural Hahadjerine population, with 13 trees, in Tassili n’Ajjer. The average oil yield of the different trees was found to be 0.3%. The composition of the oils from the trees of Hahadjerine population differed only quantitatively. The general chemical profiles of the tested oils and the percentage content of the individual compounds are summarized in Table 1.

Compounds
Trees
Moy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  
α-pinene 13.0 8.1 9.7 9.5 11.1 10.6 11.7 9.8 11.7 9.8 14.2 11.2 15.8 11.2
Fenchene 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Sabinene 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
β-pinene 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3
Myrcène 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6
Δ3-carene 8.6 8.6 7.5 6.1 7.1 7.7 13.6 7.9 12.6 7.3 4.1 6.6 10.4 8.3
Para cymene 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Limonene 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.2 0.1 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5
β-phellandrene 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Terpinolene 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6
Terpinene-4-ol 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
α-terpineol 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Terpinen-4-yle acetate 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
α-terpenyle acetate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1
β-caryophyllene 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.2
α-humulene 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2
γ-muurolene 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.2
Germacrene-D 2.5 1.7 5.0 4.4 2.9 2.5 3.5 2.3 4.5 4.7 9.9 4.3 4.7 4.1
α-muurolene 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
γ-cadinene 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2
Δ-cadinene 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.4
Caryophyllene oxyde 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Epi-cedrol 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.1 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4
Torrilenol 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2
β-acorenol 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1
Epi-α-cadinol 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
Epi-α-muurolol 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1
α-cadinol 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.3
Eudesma-4(15),7-dien-3-β-ol 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1-β-ol 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3
Ent-pima-8(14),15-diene 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5
Manoyl oxyde 13.2 10.7 10.2 17.7 18.7 20.0 15.6 20.3 12.1 12.2 15.6 21.3 21.0 16.0
Isopimaradiene 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.5 2.2 0.9 0.9 1.5 2.3 1.8 1.5
13-epimanoyl oxyde 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Ar-abietatriene 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
2-hydroxy-12-methoxy-19-norpodocarpa-4, 8,11,13-tetra-3-one 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 0.6 0.4 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.0
Unk 01 2.7 1.3 5.5 5.2 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.3 3.2 3.6 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.4
Totarol 14.5 10.6 20.5 25.6 22.8 21.7 15.0 19.1 14.3 16.2 21.0 20.8 17.7 18.4
Ferruginol 3.7 0.6 5.6 0.4 6.0 5.6 0.4 4.9 4.1 5.2 5.7 4.7 4.5 3.9
Unk 02 1.4 1.0 2.2 4.3 3.2 3.1 1.7 2.7 1.4 2.1 4.1 3.4 0.0 2.3
Unk 03 2.2 35.0 14.0 5.2 7.0 5.0 6.7 8.5 11.7 24.2 6.2 6.7 0.0 10.2
Total                           87.4

Table 1: Chemical composition of essential oils of Hahadjerine population of Cupressus dupreziana.

39 compounds were separated by GC-MS and characterized, with varied concentrations, particularly trans-totarol (19.1-33.5%), Manoyl oxide (14.1-26%), α-pinene (12.4-19.7%) and Δ3-carene (8-17.7%). The average of the remaining compounds is low, such as germacrene-D (5.3%), Ferruginol (5.2%), cis-totarol (4.5%), isopimaradiene (2%) and 2-hydroxy-12-methoxy-19 -norpodocarpa-4,8,11,13-tetra-3-one (1.3%). Analyses revealed the presence of intra-population variability. The components identified (α-pinene, Δ3-carene, germacrene-D, manoyl oxyde, cis and trans-totarol and ferruginol) show significant terpinoids variability (Figure 2). The compounds found in the Hahadjerine cypress generally resembled those previously reported to occur in some of cypress species [22-25]. In particular, α-pinene and Δ3-carene were present in high relative levels. The only exception was the tree 11 which contains a low rate of Δ3-carene, similar rate observed in several North American species of Cupressus [26].

forest-research-open-access-Chemical-Variability

Figure 2: Chemical Variability of main compounds of Cupressus dupreziana.

The principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the correlations between the 16 variables presented three axes comprising 76.19% of the total variation present in the original data. This analysis clustered populations in several groups, but the separation of populations is not clear. The ordination of population’s means obtained for the three vectors is shown in (Figure 3).

forest-research-open-access-principal-axes

Figure 3: Ordination of the first three principal axes of Hahadjerine population.

All individuals of this population have showed high α-pinene and trans-totarol levels and low quantitative variations in all their components. Mono and sesquiterpenoids variability reflects the heterogeneity of the genetic structure of Hahadjerine population [21].

Genetic analyses were carried out using 16 terpinoids including some compounds that have been shown in other species of Cupressus to be under the control of single locus with two alleles. The dendrogram based on UPGMA clustering (Manhattan distance), shows the presence of many groups (Figure 4) that confirms result obtained from ACP analyses.

forest-research-open-access-Manhattan-similarity

Figure 4: Dendrogram based on Manhattan similarity distance.

The first group formed by individuals (1, 13, 2, 7 and 9), rich in myrcene, Δ3-carene, limonene, terpinolene and manoyl oxyde. The second group is divided into two groups, one formed by individuals (3, 10 and 11) rich in cis-totarol and germacrene-D, while the other includes individuals (4, 5, 6, 8, and 12) characterized by components manoyl oxyde and trans-totarol. Aggregation of Hahadjerine population trees into small groups is an indication of terpenoids variability in this population. The diversity of the terpinoids contents reflects the existence of considerable genetic variability [27,28]. The UPGMA analysis of terpene traits confirms this variability, but no clear conclusions can be transmitted between individuals’ geographic distribution and genetic structure.

In brief, essential oils analysis carried out on 13 individuals of C. dupreziana showed both intra-population variability in their terpenoid content, with abundance of trans-totarol, Manoyl oxide, α-pinene, Δ3- carene and germacrene-D.

Acknowledgements

The works was supported by Algerian MESRS and Laboratoire de Chimie des Hétérocycles et des glucides de Clermont Ferrant. The authors thank Lahbib tergui guide in Tassili n’Ajjer.

References

  1. IUCN (2006) Conifer Specialist Group (1988) Cupressus dupreziana var. dupreziana. Red List of threatened Species. Retrieved on 10 June 2006. Listed as Critical (CR A2c. C1 v2.3).
  2. Barry JP, Belin B, Celles JC, Dubost D, Faurel I, et al. (1970) Essai de monographie du Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus. Cyprès endémique du Tassili des Ajjers (Sahara central). Bul Soc Hist Nat Afr Nord 61: 95-176.
  3. Piovetti L, Diara A (1977) Sesquiterpenes from Cupressus dupreziana. Phytochemistry 16: 103-106.
  4. Piovetti L, Combaut G, Diara A (1980) Monoterpenes et sesquiterpenes oxygenes du Cupressus dupreziana. Phytochemistry 19: 2117-2120.
  5. Piovetti L, Francisco C, Pauly G, Benchabane O, Bernard-Dagan C, et al. (1981) Volatile constituents of Cupressus dupreziana and sesquiterpenes of C. sempervirens. Phytochemistry 20: 1299-1302.
  6. Pauly G, Yani A, Piovetti L, Bernard-Dagan C (1983) Volatile constituents of the leaves of Cupressus dupreziana and Cupressus sempervirens. Phytochemistry 22: 957-959.
  7. Ramdani M, Rached O, Laouer H, El Koli M, Lograda T (2007) Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus Natural Product Communications 2: 945-949.
  8. Christelle PL, Xavier F, Louisette LC, Loiseau AM, Fellous R, et al. (2003) Chemical composition of cypress essential oils: Volatile constituents of leaf oils from seven cultivated Cupressus species. J Essent Oil Res 15: 242-247.
  9. Sacchetti G, Maietti S, Muzzoli M, Scaglianti M, Manfredini S, et al. (2005) Comparative evaluation of 11 essential oils of different origin as functional antioxidants, antiradicals and antimicrobials in foods. Food Chemistry 91: 621-632.
  10. Tapondjoua AL, Adlerb C, Fontemc DA, Boudaa H, Reichmuth C (2005) Bioactivities of cymol and essential oils of Cupressus sempervirens and Eucalyptus saligna against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Tribolium confusum du Val. Journal of Stored Products Research 41: 91-102.
  11. Chanegriha N, Baaliouamer A, Meklati BY, Chretien JR, Keravis J (1997) GC and GC/MS leaf oil analysis of four Algerian cypress species. J Essent Oil Res 9: 555-559.
  12. Ramdani M, Lograda T (2008) Foliar Sesquiterpene Variations in Natural Populations of Cupressus dupreziana in Tassili n’Ajjer (Algeria). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 8: 59-63.
  13. Pichot C, Borrut A, El-Maataoui M (1998) Unexpected DNA content in the end osperm of Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus seeds and its implications in the reproductive process. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11: 148-152.
  14. Pichot C, Liens B, Nava JL, Bachelier JB, El Maâtaoui M (2008) Cypress surrogate mother produces haploid progeny from alien pollen. Genetics 178: 379-383.
  15. Pichot C, El-Maataoui M, Raddi S, Raddi P (2001) Surrogate mother for endangered Cupressus. Nature 412: 39.
  16. Ramdani M, Lograda T, Chalard P, Chalchat JC Figueredo G (2011) Chemical Variability of Essential Oils in Natural Populations of Cupressus dupreziana. Nat Prod Commun 6: 87-92.
  17. Rösch P, Popp J, Kiefer W (1999) Raman and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopic investigation on Lamiaceae plants. Journal of Molecular Structure 480-481: 121-124.
  18. Adams R.P (2001) Identification of Essential oil components by Gas chromatography/Mass spectroscopy; Allured/Carol Steam. IL. USA.
  19. Swigar AA, Silverstein RM (1981) Monoterpenes, Infrared, Mass, NMR Spectra and Kovats Indices, Aldrich Chem. Co. Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  20. Baradat Ph, Yazdani R (1988) Genetic expression for monoterpens in clones of Pinus sylvestris grow on different sites. Scand J For Res 3: 25-36.
  21. Hemmateenejad B, Javadnia K, Elyasi M (2007) Quantitative structure-retention relationship for the Kovats retention indices of a large set of terpenes: A combined data splitting-feature selection strategy. Anal Chim Acta 592: 72-81.
  22. Zavarin E, Lawrence L, Thomas MC (1971) Compositional variations of leaf monoterpenes in Cupressus macrocarpa, C. pygmaea, C. goveniana, C. abramsiana and C. sargentii. Phytochemistry 10: 379-393.
  23. Kim YK, Cool LG, Zavarin E (1994) cis-Calamenene related sesquiterpenoids from Cupressus Bakari foliage. Phytochemistry 36: 961-965.
  24. Cool LG, Zi-Ling Hu, Zavarin E (1998) Foliage terpenoids of Chinese Cupressus Species. Bioch. Syst. Ecol 26: 899-913.
  25. Cool LG (2005) Sesquiterpenes from Cupressus macrocarpa foliage. Phytochemistry 66: 249-260.
  26. Rafii Z, Cool LG, Zavarin E (1992) Variability of foliar Mono- and Sesquiterpenoids of Cupressus Bakari. Bioch. Syst. Ecol 20: 123-131.
  27. Forrest GI (1980) Genotypic variation among native Scots pine populations in Scotland based on monoterpene analysis. Forestry 53: 101-128.
  28. Raddi S, Sümer S (1999) Genetic diversity in natural Cupressus sempervirens L. Populations in turkey. Bioch. Syst. Ecol 27: 799-814.
Citation: Ramdani M, Lograda T, Chalard P, Figueredo G, Chalchat JC, et al. (2012) Essential Oil Variability in Natural Hahadjerine Population of Cupressus dupreziana in Tassili n’Ajjer (Algeria). J Forest Res Open Access 1:101.

Copyright: © 2012 Ramdani M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top