GET THE APP

Ergonomics and Comfort in Protective and Sport Clothing: A Brief
Journal of Ergonomics

Journal of Ergonomics
Open Access

ISSN: 2165-7556

+44 1300 500008

Review Article - (2014) Volume 0, Issue 0

Ergonomics and Comfort in Protective and Sport Clothing: A Brief Review

Phillip A Bishop1*, Gytis Balilonis2, Jon Kyle Davis3 and Yang Zhang4
1Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
2Jon Kyle Davis, Elon University, Elon, NC, USA
3Department of Kinesiology, Montevallo University, Montevallo, AL, USA
4Chinese Badminton Association, Jiaxing branch, Zhong Huan Xi Lu, 2318 Hao, Jiaxing Yu Mao Qiu Xie Hui, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, 314000, People’s Republic of China
*Corresponding Author: Phillip A Bishop, The University of Alabama, PO Box 870312, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0312, USA, Tel: 205 348 8370 Email:

Abstract

Industrial and sport protective clothing (PC) is governed by protection requirements and sport clothing is generally selected on the basis of performance and comfort. The impact of PC on performance is determined by the nature of the work or sport, the metabolic rate required, the ambient environment, and the characteristics of the PC. The chief ergonomics challenge of PC is when moderate to high work rates must be performed in moderate to hot ambient environments. Comfort is typically subjectively measured and impacts performance. Comfort is multifactorial and dynamic rather than static. Sport clothing design is chiefly concerned with maximizing heat and moisture loss and comfort; however, attempts to use synthetic fabrics to increase comfort and heat dissipation have generally not been successful. Future innovations may include protective and sport clothing that responds to the environment, and that features integrated cooling systems with greater cooling capacity and practicality for mobile workers and sportsmen. A brief review of key challenges in the ergonomics of PC and sport clothing is presented along with potential directions for advancing ergonomics and comfort.

Keywords: Heat Stress; Sportswear; Clothing and Sports Performance; Work Performance; Microclimate; Layer; Moisture; Evaporation; Sweat

Abbreviations

PC: Protective Clothing; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature

Introduction

The aim of this review is to provide a brief perspective on comfort and performance challenges in protective and sport clothing. Protective clothing (PC) is needed in work or sport to protect against physical hazards, impact, abrasion, and against toxic hazards. Protective and sport clothing may also be used to enhance performance.

Protective and sport clothing provide vital functions but also add to physiological loads that could contribute to a progressive decline in physical and mental capacity [1-3]. This consequently could lower productivity and performance to variable extents [1,2]. The impact of clothing on comfort and performance of individuals at work or sport are therefore of particular importance. We review the ergonomics of industrial and sport PC and sport clothing with regard to the interactions between humans and clothing, with a view to optimize human comfort, safety well-being and performance.

In this review, protective clothing includes clothing covering over 30% of the body and used in industry, sport, the military and emergency response. Sport clothing includes clothing which provides protection impact and abrasion, or improves performance. The current design of most protective industrial and sport clothing reduces the rate of heat dissipation; therefore, this clothing presents particular challenges to health and performance in hot and high humid environments in both industry and sport. Consequently, this review will cover a variety of applications with emphasis on the challenges in comfort and ergonomics for warm to hot environments.

Why Protective And Sport Clothing?

In industry typically government mandates require the use of PC under specified circumstances. In the United States, for example, the National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health and the National Fire Protection Association regulate PC requirements [3]. PC is often mandatory to protect from physical, nuclear, pathogenic, and chemical hazards at work. Examples include: the ballistic protective vest which protects against projectiles in law enforcement and military applications; firefighter’s PC which serves to protect against heat and flame; and encapsulating coveralls which protect against toxins and pathogens in biomedical, and hazardous materials work sites. Encapsulating PC may also be required to protect from contaminants being released into clean room work environment in modern industry. Likewise, chemical PC is used in manufacturing as well as in remediation of sites with lead or friable asbestos. In addition, radiation protection via clothing may also be required. Chemical and biological, and sometime radiation clothing protection also is commonly needed for emergency first responders, military applications, and medical personnel. PC may be used in cold environments to protect against cold hazards.

In sport, some sport regulating bodies require certain sport PC, but this is generally done only in the most general terms, allowing sportsmen and team’s latitude in what is used. Sport PC becomes a mandatory requirement in certain sports such as American football, baseball, lacrosse, and field and ice hockey. In cricket, American football and baseball, and other sports the PC padding is used to protect against impact and abrasion. In sport clothing, clothing may also provide warmth, as for cross-country skiing, open water swimming, sport breath-hold, and scuba diving. Sportswear worn by bicyclists often offers a convenient means for storing food and other items of use, as well as providing support and padding.

Examples of sport clothing to enhance performance, include special swimming suits, now banned for Olympic competition [4,5] because they were shown to give a performance advantage. Speed skating and down-hill ski suits also provide aerodynamic advantages [6,7]. More often, in both professional and recreational sport, comfort of the wearer is considered an integrated part of performance sport clothing. Some clothing is sold in both sport and industry for its alleged ability to improve comfort and reduce heat stress via “wicking sweat away from the skin” [8]. In adventure sports such as mountain climbing, sport clothing with advanced moisture-wicking and quickdrying properties attracts interest particularly for wet environments or those with large temperature changes. Sport clothing has also been marketed which allegedly liberates heat to warm users. Whereas the principle is based on the heat released when particular fabrics absorb water, the amount of heat released is low. The heat may be liberated before the wearer goes into the cold and some liberated heat will be lost to the ambient environment, so the useful heat effects may be minimal [Bishop, unpublished observations].

Characteristics of Clothing Comfort

Clothing comfort is rated among its most important attributes [9,10]. Bell et al. [11] reported that clothing comfort rating was associated with performance on a cognitive exam. Maintaining accurate cognition and a positive mood is especially important in emergency first responders and law enforcement and military applications in PC.

Clothing comfort is a very complex characteristic of PC and sport clothing. Comfort is comprised of: 1) thermal, 2) non-thermal, 3) and wear conditions [12]; or: 1) physiological, 2) psychological, and 3) physical components [13]. Comfort arises from the integrated visual, thermal, and tactile sensations, the psychological status, body-clothing interactions, and ambient environments [14]. Comfort of the same PC or sport clothing may change over time and initial judgment of clothing comfort or discomfort may change after a period of wear. If clothing becomes damp or wet, in most cases comfort diminishes [15,16].

Thermal comfort is a key issue in PC use and ergonomics as well as in sport clothing. It arises in part from neural thermosensory monitoring of the area between the wearer’s skin and the outer-most layer of the clothing, the micro-environment [17-21]. In fact, it should be noted that comfort has little to do with the macro-environment and much more to do with the micro-environment, the only environment with which the body has contact. It is also noteworthy that even the nude body forms a micro-environment that is generally warmer and more humid than the ambient environment except in the hottest ambient environments.

Comfort measurements of clothing must be based on subjective evaluations of human wearers (e.g., see [22,23]) which integrate the combined effects of all relevant variables of clothing systems on comfort [24]. Wong et al. [25] proposed a combination of objective and subjective measures to model comfort, which probably will yield the best validity. Accurately predicting human responses to PC seems unlikely in view of the observed variable nature of humans with respect to comfort [26]. For further information on measuring comfort, see Bishop [27].

Ergonomics Issues

Ergonomics issues in industry

In industry, the key ergonomics issue is minimizing the reduced human performance and productivity that often accompanies PC use. Reduced productivity arises from several issues including the weight and bulk of the clothing, visual and tactile reductions associated with some clothing, and the heat stress that typically accompanies PC use in hot ambient environments. As can be seen in Table 1, the weight of PC directly contributes to the energy costs of a task, and this contribution is most profound for weight supported activities as opposed to seated activities such as driving a forklift or other vehicle. The weight of PC may be most problematic for workers such as firefighters who have to transport themselves, their PC, and equipment up several flights of stairs [28].

Characteristics of the Work or Sport
Metabolic Rate The higher the metabolic rate, the more heat the worker/sportsman must dissipate - good in cold environments, challenging in the heat.
Economy/Efficiency The more economical the worker/sportsman, the less energy liberated as heat.
Weight-Supported If the worker/sportsman must support his/her own body weight plus the weight of protective clothing (PC) and other equipment, the total weight will impact the required metabolic rate.
Characteristics of the Protective and Sport Clothing
Weight Impacts the energy costs of transporting the additional weight of PC.
Resistance to Movement Raises the energy costs. The greater the interference and the greater the movement required, the greater the increase in energy costs.
Clothing Insulation Impacts the micro-environment under clothing. High insulation reduces the heat transfer rate.
Clothing Permeability Impacts the micro-environment under clothing. Low permeability reduces the sweat evaporation rate.
Clothing Reflectivity Impacts the heat gain of clothing.
Percent of Surface Area of Body Covered Fully encapsulating PC generally presents more ergonomics issues for work in warm/hot environments.
Degree of Isolation Fully encapsulating PC totally isolates the worker from the environment; some PC has many openings for movement of air in and out. Greater the air exchange may be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on the environment and other factors listed above.
Fit May impact clothing pumping effects, depending on the clothing and movements.
Fabric Industrial PC fabrics must exhibit protective characteristics, but in sport clothing, moisture transfer, style, and comfort are important for marketing. Some fabrics may release a small amount of heat.
Characteristics of the Ambient Environment
Temperature Impacts dry heat transfer between the worker/sportsman and the ambient environment.
Water Vapor Pressure Impacts evaporation rate and cooling.
Radiant Load Radiation from any source will increase the heat that must be dissipated by the worker/sportsman.

Table 1: Key variables Affecting the Ergonomics of Protective and Sport Clothing.

The bulk of PC may add to the energy costs of the movement [29]. This is due to both the weight and the energy costs of bending the layers of PC. Again this may be illustrated most readily in firefighter PC, where multiple layers of fabric are required to protect the worker. We have measured firefighter PC at 19.1 kg [30,31], so just carrying this weight adds to the metabolic costs. Added burden of PC also displays changes in the wearer’s gait variability and influences the balance, muscular capabilities and fatigue, which increase the likelihood of slips and falls during prolonged work [32-35].

Any increase in energy costs due to PC [29] will raise the metabolic rate therefore raising the heat produced by the worker. In cold environments, this will keep the person warmer. In warm/hot environments, this further raises the heat dissipation requirements. The American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists guidelines for work in PC [36] use the ambient wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and the anticipated metabolic rate, which does not account for any additional metabolic costs of any PC use [29] to specify workrest ratios for workers. Use of the ambient WBGT is appropriate for “light summer clothing” for which it was originally intended [37], but must be adjusted in some manner for PC use. This has been done using “adjustment factors” [38,39]; however, this approach does not account for the differences in adjustment factor between very cold ambient conditions where the appropriate adjustment is large, and very hot environments (such as on the fire field) where the appropriate adjustment might be negative. This and other issues have been discussed extensively elsewhere [40].

The most problematic aspect of PC use is when work or sport occurs in hot ambient environments (Table 1). The nature of PC reduces the rate of heat loss in both industry and sport. Humans working or exercising at moderate or higher metabolic rates remove the metabolic heat via sweat evaporation from the skin. PC of all types typically reduces sweat evaporation from the skin, consequently reducing the rate of heat loss. When the rate of heat loss falls below the rate of production, heat storage occurs raising the risk of heat injury. Less recognized is the potential diminution of cognitive capabilities [31,41,42], which may be particularly important in emergency first responders. Sweat rates have been as high as 1.0 L/hr during industrial simulations [43] and hypohydration is also exacerbated by inadequate opportunities to drink during respiratory protective mask use in industry. Dehydration of 2% of body mass has been associated with reduced performance and increased risk of heat injury [44,45].

In cold ambient environments, the insulative value of some PC is advantageous because heat dissipation is reduced. However, in some industrial situations, the metabolic rate variations may result in workers being cold sometimes and too hot others, within the same ambient environment. PC use in cold environments adds no marked difference in heat loads when performing moderate work load [46]. For some industrial PC situations, such as working in toxic environments, the ability to adjust clothing insulation may be restricted which can result in workers being alternatively too hot or too cold.

Ergonomics issues in sport

In sport, unlike PC in industry, clothing is much less regulated. For example, the National Collegiate Athletic Association regulates when American football clothing should not be worn (to protect against heat stress in pre-season practices which occur in hot weather), rather than specifying specific sport PC requirements [47]. Most of the major sports organizations and governing bodies, such as the International Olympic Committee [48], do not regulate sport clothing for training and competition in environmental extremes. Sport clothing is regulated, however, in swimming [4,5].

In sport, as in industry, the energy costs of the sport PC contribute more to those players moving their body a lot (e.g., a running or defensive back) than those who move less (e.g., offensive lineman). In sport it is well known that the sport PC of American football slows the player, so running times are reported with and without the football PC.

The increased heat strain of sport PC and the high metabolic rates during many sports may lead to hypohydration. Hypohydration is also exacerbated by inadequate opportunities to drink during sport competitions. Hypohydration contributes to the risk of heat illness [49]. Hypohydration also negatively affects performance during soccer [50] and has been proposed to play a role in fatigue [51,52]. Sweat rates have been as high as 2.9 L/h during sport competition [53]. Hypohydration during PC use also causes deterioration in mood and increase in perception of exertion [31], which could be critical in work place practice or during game competition that requires sustained attention and highly controlled mood state.

Heat stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States for sportsmen, exceeded only by cardiac abnormalities and neck and cervical injuries [54]. For high-school sports for 100 schools over a 2-year span, almost 19% of all injuries were related to dehydration and heat illness [54]. Sport clothing could exaggerate the risk of heat illness. Evidence has shown sport PC (i.e., helmet, shoulder pads) that is worn during American football game resulted in higher physiological strain [55], which is consistent with data reporting that risks of heat illness among American football players were 10 times higher than other athletes [56]. Future research is warranted with sport PC in impact sports.

It is obvious that impermeable clothing will retard sweat evaporation, but even permeable clothing tends to raise the water vapor pressure under the PC, slowing the rate of evaporation and heat dissipation. Likewise, impermeable and semi-permeable parts of PC in sport, such as the protective pads in cricket, American football, and baseball restrict evaporation to varying extents depending on the characteristics and area of the coverage.

Davis et al. [57] examined the impact of almost-encapsulating Islamic athletic clothing on female sportswomen exercising in a hot environment. Surprisingly the extra clothing did not significantly increase the heat strain under the conditions of the study. Islamic athletic clothing did significantly decrease clothing comfort and increased skin wetness due to increased skin contact compared to a traditional soccer uniform.

Other sport clothing retards sweat evaporation, but generally to a lesser extent than sport PC. In some sports such as running, cycling, and soccer, the high metabolic rates require high rates of heat dissipation [51,58]. In most cases in the heat, the less clothing covering the skin, the better the thermoregulation.

Manufacturers have touted many novel fabrics as having superior sweat removal properties. Most research has not supported this concept [59]. For example, Ha et al. [60] compared 100% polyester to 100% cotton with 5 females completing 4 bouts of 10 min of exercise of 30% VO2max in 24°C. In polyester compared to cotton, rectal temperature increased significantly faster and the overall temperature was higher throughout the trial. Mean heart rate was higher in polyester; and cotton exhibited a higher surface temperature suggesting that dry heat loss could occur more easily [60]. The same results were seen in a 37°C environment with polyester compared to cotton and a cotton and wool blend [60,61]. Enhanced moisture absorption by the fabric liberated more heat [60,62-64], which may help wearers feel more comfortable and dry with cotton compared to polyester. Four of five subjects felt wetter with polyester compared to cotton [60] attributed to decreased skin wetness with cotton because it held more moisture than polyester, which had been previously shown [16,65] in polyester compared to cotton [66] and wool [67]. However, if the polyester material is hygroscopically treated, skin wetness can be reduced [67]. For further comparisons of fabrics in sport clothing applications see the following references [59,61,64,68-73].

It appears that 100% polyester fabric or other synthetic fabrics offer no thermoregulatory or comfort advantages with some studies showing a worse thermoregulation and clothing comfort than natural fabrics [59]. Most studies have not replicated typical intermittent exercise but have been more work-related [60,61,64,73]. Even when studies have incorporated protocols similar to most athletic or recreational endeavors, no thermoregulatory advantage has been gained with synthetic fabrics [71,74,75].

Davis and Bishop [47] recently reported that most studies examining synthetic compared to natural fabrics have used a modest environmental (19-27°C) temperature with only a few studies employing a hot environment (>30°C). Fabrics showing superior properties in a low-intensity exercise in cool or moderate conditions may be overwhelmed in hotter and more humid environments or during higher metabolic rates.

Another innovation in sport clothing is so-called “compression garments”. Previously, compression garments have been used in clinical settings for patients with circulatory problems [76,77], with the intent of increasing venous blood flow and reducing venous stasis [78]. Recently, compression garments have been introduced to sport and their use has since spread.

Compression garment manufacturers claim [79] that compression garments “stabilize” the muscle which allegedly increases blood flow to the working muscles, thereby leading to improved performance. Possible performance and recovery benefits from wearing compression garment have been reported [80,81]. However, other researchers did not find any physiological, thermoregulatory, or performance benefits from wearing compression garments [82] [Balilionis, unpublished]. Higher mean skin temperatures were reported after 30-min intermittent exercise protocol with full-body compression garment [83], during five minute warm-up [80] and 4×15 minute repeated bout exercises [82] with compression garment compared to control. Collectively the studies suggest that it is not likely that improved performance effects will be found [80-83].

There is little research concerning the impact of channeled-fabric synthetic compression garment on thermoregulation and performance. One manufacturer [79] stated that compression garments with inner and outer channels in the fabric cool the body and aid sweat evaporation from the clothing by moving the moisture and warmth away from the skin and thus improve performance. Study participants reported feeling more comfortable and that they felt that they sweated less with a channeled synthetic compression t-shirt compared to regular synthetic t-shirt during 3-hour “industrial protocol” [Balilionis, unpublished] and 30-km bike time trial [Balilionis, unpublished] in a hot environment. In addition, changes in rectal and chest skin temperature were smaller with channeled synthetic compression t-shirt compared to regular synthetic t-shirt [Balilionis, unpublished].

In winter sports and some recreational sports during cool weather such as sport hunting, camping, and rock climbing, sport clothing to keep sportsmen warm is highly valued. In contrast to the difficulties in developing new fabrics to keep sportsmen cool, advances have been made in warmth [84-86] using advanced insulated fiber and fabric structures. Recent innovation includes battery-powered heated trousers designed for boosting Olympic athletes’ performance. Passive heating of the thighs following the warm-up completion using pants incorporating electrically heated pads slowed the decline in muscle temperature and enhanced the subsequent sprint cycling performance [87].

Sport clothing is often marketed based on the ideas of improving performance, reducing thermal stress, keeping the sportsman drier, and often on the basis of improved comfort. Taken the above available evidence together, claims about superior sport clothing fabrics should be tested.

Improving Comfort and Ergonomics

From our research, the best hope of improving the comfort and ergonomics of protective and sport clothing lies in the development of new materials and new approaches. Materials improving upon the well-known triple-layer moisture transmitting material (Gore-Tex, Gore Inc., Elkton, MD, USA) may improve vapor transmission rate and increase sweat evaporation in industrial and sport PC. Other materials may provide better protection with less bulk and weight, such as some modern fabrics have done for ballistic vest protection (e.g., Kevlar, E.I. DuPont, Wilmington, DE, USA). Novel fabric technology in the laboratory includes shape memory material and phase change material which contains automatic environmental acclimatizing properties [88], potentially having wide applications in protective and sport clothing. Innovative three-dimensional fabric structure could also reduce the expense and weight with improved protection [89].

Other than future development of advanced materials, we suggest clothing cut should be studied. Clothing affects thermoregulation to varying degrees, with evaporative resistance being the major determinant in maintaining the thermal balance [59]. Vapor and moisture permeability characteristics of the clothing play a critical role in influencing the micro-environment and therefore the wearer comfort. In this regard, increasing ventilation through smart clothing cut or combining different fabric panels (e.g., employing highly vapor permeable fabric) at critical points could yield better performance and comfort. This has been supported in a recent study [90], in which placing clothing vents at torso, arm, and legs in combat uniforms promoted heat transfer and reduced physiological strain. This aspect of clothing ergonomics is easily achievable. More research is needed to determine locations of critical points within the micro-environment of protective and sport clothing and thus will enable manufactures to incorporate smart vents at critical points.

With regard to the challenges of heat dissipation for PC in warm or hot environments, the best short-term solution is probably microenvironmental cooling [91-93]. This issue has been discussed in a recent publication [40]. In brief, cooling is supplied via either cooled liquid [94], cooled gases [43], or phase-change materials [95]. Typically the cooling garment is a vest but a cooling cap is also available [96]. Often when worn under PC, the cooling capacity may be limited. With phasechange cooling under PC, replacing or removing the cooling system may be problematic under conditions where PC cannot be removed. Supplying large volumes of cooling to mobile workers and sportsmen can be challenging particularly at locations without an electrical supply.

A recently developed cooling system attempts to cool sportsmen or workers by cooling the palmar surface of hands [30]. The batterypowered hand-held cooling device circulates chilled water to cool the palm and fingers, which is suitable for highly mobile and fully encumbered emergency first responders. Sports such as American football and a few others have employed hand cooling in conjunction with fans to provide area cooling. For more information on personal microclimate cooling in occupational settings and sport, see reviews [94,97-100].

While heating is generally less challenging than cooling, self-heated insulated sport clothing remains a need for many winter sports and in military applications during cold weather. The common method to keep one warm in the cold is through the use of multiple insulated layers of clothing, adding extra weight and bulk to the wearer and trapping humidity between layers. A novel approach is now available, involving embedded metallic heating elements (conductive metal materials) into clothing [101,102]. The battery-powered heated trousers used in the past summer Olympics [87] is the most recent technology advancement in this regard. More work is needed to address this technology’s field applications during prolonged military operations and wearer discomfort arisen from the rigid nature of metallic elements and its logistic maintenance and durability.

Future Directions

In industrial PC, the need to increase safety and productivity should drive the development of new technology and clothing. In sport clothing, marketing competition will likely provide most of the incentive for further improvements in both comfort and ergonomics.

Development of active fabrics and clothing that responds to activity and the ambient environment should improve comfort as well as performance. Clothing systems that can automatically or easily manually adjust water vapor transmission capacity and the rate of heat dissipation both through the fabric and at openings would be of great value in both industry and sport, and in some PC applications.

Innovation of an integrated cooling clothing system could also allow protective and sport clothing better coping with rapid environmental variations. Portable circulated liquid and gas cooling with ultrathin, flexible tubes in the clothing textile structure have shown some promise for mobile applications. However, it remains challenging to design and manufacture integrated cooling clothing that takes full consideration of usability (e.g., performance, weight of system), durability (e.g., dimensional stability during repeated use, flexural endurance, abrasion resistance, mechanical strength), maintainability (e.g., ease of care, launderability), and affordability (e.g., material cost, maintenance cost).

Future PC and sport clothing is expected to feature smart responses with artificial intelligence that interacts with humans, the environment, and clothing itself. Smart protective and sport clothing systems incorporating noninvasive sensors and monitors into clothing for assessing and diagnosing the wearer’s real-time physiological status (e.g., heart rate, electrocardiography, respiration, core temperature, metabolic rate, and blood pressure) and environment (e.g., humidity, heat flux, chemicals) would be of great utility in improving safety. Future smart clothing would allow early detection of medical problems and enable advanced action to ensure safety of the wearer, which is of great value for athletes, emergency first responders, and in military applications. Trans-disciplinary research and development of smart medical systems and technology are currently underway in industry and research laboratories and future technology transfers are foreseeable.

In summary, industrial and sport PC and sport clothing can compromise performance and comfort. With continued research and innovation, it is expected that PC and sport clothing will steadily improve in comfort, health and safety of the wearer.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no funding was received for completing this work. Author ZY is a coach of the Chinese Badminton Association, Jiaxing branch. The views herein are the private opinions of author ZY and are not reflecting the views of the Chinese Badminton Association.

References

  1. Bishop P (1997) Thermal environments: Applied physiology of thermoregulation and exposure control, The Occupational Environment- Its evaluation and control. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Virginia, USA.
  2. Ramsey JD, Bishop PA (2003) Hot and cold environments, in The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control and Management. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Virginia, USA.
  3. Fire Protection Association (2005) NFPA 1977, standard on protective clothing and equipment for wildland fire fighting. National Fire Protection Association, USA.
  4. Chatard JC, Wilson B (2008) Effect of fastskin suits on performance, drag, and energy cost of swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: 1149-1154.
  5. Kuper GH, Sterken E (2008) Do Skin Suits Affect The Average Skating Speed? Sports Technology 1: 189-195.
  6. Brownlie LW, Kyle CR, Harber E, MacDonald R, Shorten MR (2004) Reducing the aerodynamic drag of sports apparel: development of the NIKE Swift sprint running and Swift Skin speed skating suits. The Engineering of Sport, Springer.
  7. Wickwire PJ, Bishop PA, Green JM, Richardson RT, Lomax RG, et al. (2007) Physiological and comfort effects of commerical "wicking" clothing under a bullet proof vest. Int J Ind Ergon 37: 643-651.
  8. Wong ASW, Li Y (2002) Clothing sensory Comfort and Brand Preference. 4th IFFTI International Conference, Hong Kong, China.
  9. Li Y (2005) Perceptions of temperature, moisture and comfort in clothing during environmental transients. Ergonomics 48: 234-248.
  10. Bell R, Cardello AV, Schutz HG (2005) Relationship between perceived clothing comfort and Exam Performance. Family Consumer Science Research Journal 33: 308-320.
  11. Fourt L, Hollies NRS (1970) Clothing: Comfort and function. Martin Dekker Inc, USA.
  12. Li Y (2001) The science of clothing comfort’ The Textile Institute: Manchester.
  13. Berglund LG, Gonzalez RR (1977) Evaporation of sweat from sedentary man in humid environments. J Appl Physiol 42: 767-772.
  14. Gwosdow AR, Stevens JC, Berglund LG, Stolwijk JA (1986) Skin friction and fabric sensations in neutral and warm environments. Textile Research Journal 9: 574-580.
  15. Sullivan PJ, Mekjavic IB (1992) Temperature and humidity within the clothing microenvironment. Aviat Space Environ Med 63: 186-192.
  16. Bishop P, Gu D, Clapp A (2000) Climate under impermeable protective clothing. Int J Ind Ergon 25: 233-238.
  17. Muir IH, Bishop PA, Kozusko J (2001) Micro-environment changes inside impermeable protective clothing during a continuous work exposure. Ergonomics 44: 953-961.
  18. Bishop P, Jung A, Church B (2003) Micro-environmental responses to five protective suits in two environments. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Protective Clothing, Montreux, Switzerland.
  19. Gao N, Niu J (2004) CFD Study on micro-environment around the human body and personalized ventilation. Building and Environment 39: 795-805.
  20. Hollies NRS (1997) Psychological scaling in Comfort assessment, Clothing Comfort. Ann Arbor Science Publishers.
  21. Winakor G, Kim CJ (1980) Fabric Hand: Tactile Sensory Assessment. Textile Research Journal 50: 601-10.
  22. Barker R (2002) From fabric hand to thermal comfort the evolving role of objective measurements in explaining human comfort response to textiles. International Journal Clothing Science and Technology 14: 181-200.
  23. Wong A, Y Li, Yeung PKW (2004) Predicting clothing sensory comfort with artificial hybrid models. Textile Research Journal 74: 13-19.
  24. Bishop PA, Pieroni RE, Smith JF, Constable SH (1991) Limitations to heavy work at 21 degrees C of personnel wearing the U.S. military chemical defense ensemble. Aviat Space Environ Med 62: 216-220.
  25. Bishop P (2009) Testing for Fabric Comfort, Fabric Testing, Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge.
  26. Williams-Bell FM, Boisseau G, McGill J, Kostiuk A, Hughson RL (2010) Air management and physiological responses during simulated firefighting tasks in a high-rise structure. Appl Ergon 41: 251-259.
  27. Bishop P, Krock L (1991) Energy costs of moderate work activities in protective clothing, Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety III. Taylor and Francis, London.
  28. Zhang Y, Bishop PA, Casaru C, Davis JK (2009) A new hand-cooling device to enhance firefighter heat strain recovery. J Occup Environ Hyg 6: 283-288.
  29. Zhang Y, Balilionis G, Casaru C, Geary C, Schumacker RE, et al. (2013) Effects of caffeine and menthol on cognition and mood during simulated firefighting in the heat. Appl Ergon .
  30. Punakallio AHM, Grönqvist R (2005) Slip and fall risk among firefighters in relation to balance, muscular capacities and age. Safety Science 43: 455-468.
  31. Kong PW, Beauchamp G, Suyama J, Hostler D (2010) Effect of fatigue and hypohydration on gait characteristics during treadmill exercise in the heat while wearing firefighter thermal protective clothing. Gait Posture 31: 284-288.
  32. Kong PW, Suyama J, Cham R, Hostler D (2012) The relationship between physical activity and thermal protective clothing on functional balance in firefighters. Res Q Exerc Sport 83: 546-552.
  33. Park K, Rosengren KS, Horn GP, Smith DL, Hsiao-Wecksler ET (2011) Assessing gait changes in firefighters due to fatigue and protective clothing. Safety Science 49: 719-726.
  34. ACGIH (2008) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, USA.
  35. Yaglou CP, Minard D (1957) Control of heat casualties at military training centers. AMA Arch Ind Health 16: 302-316.
  36. Reneau P, Bishop P (1996) A review of the suggested WBGT adjustment for encapsulating protective clothing. AIHA J 57: 58-61.
  37. Reneau P, Bishop P (1996) Relating heat strain in the chemical defense ensemble to the ambient environment. Mil Med 161: 210-213.
  38. Bishop PA, Wingo J, Crew K, Al-Nawaiseh A (2014) Heat Stress and Heat Strain in Protective Clothing: Micro-environmental Considerations. In Protective Clothing: Managing Thermal Stress. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, USA.
  39. Ramsey JD, Kwon YG (1992) Recommended alert limits for perceptual motor loss in hot environments. Int J Ind Ergon 9: 245-257.
  40. O’Neal EK, Poulos SP, Wingo JE, Richardson MT, Bishop PA (2010) Effects of Work in a Hot Environment on Repeated Performances of Multiple Types of Simple Mental Tasks. Int J Ind Ergon 40: 77-81.
  41. Zhang Y, Bishop PA, Green JM, Richardson MT, Schumacker RE (2010) Evaluation of a carbon dioxide personal cooling device for workers in hot environments. J Occup Environ Hyg 7: 389-396.
  42. American College of Sports Medicine, Sawka MN, Burke LM, Eichner ER, Maughan RJ, et al. (2007) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39: 377-390.
  43. Cheuvront SN, Kenefick RW, Montain SJ, Sawka MN (2010) Mechanisms of aerobic performance impairment with heat stress and dehydration. J Appl Physiol 109: 1989-1995.
  44. Rissanen S, Rintamäki H (1997) Thermal responses and physiological strain in men wearing impermeable and semipermeable protective clothing in the cold. Ergonomics 40: 141-150.
  45. Bergeron MF, Bahr R, Bärtsch P, Bourdon L, Calbet JA, et al. (2012) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on thermoregulatory and altitude challenges for high-level athletes. Br J Sports Med 46: 770-779.
  46. Casa DJ (1999) Exercise in the heat. I. Fundamentals of thermal physiology, performance implications, and dehydration. J Athl Train 34: 246-252.
  47. Drust B, Reilly T, Cable NT (2000) Physiological responses to laboratory-based soccer-specific intermittent and continuous exercise. J Sports Sci 18: 885-892.
  48. Maughan RJ, Leiper JB (1994) Fluid replacement requirements in soccer. J Sports Sci 12 Spec No: S29-34.
  49. Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J (2003) Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J Sports Sci 21: 519-528.
  50. Shirreffs SM, Aragon-Vargas LF, Chamorro M, Maughan RJ, Serratosa L, et al. (2005) The sweating response of elite professional soccer players to training in the heat. Int J Sports Med 26: 90-95.
  51. Huffman EA, Yard EE, Fields SK, Collins CL, Comstock RD (2008) Epidemiology of rare injuries and conditions among United States high school athletes during the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 school years. J Athl Train 43: 624-630.
  52. Armstrong LE, Johnson EC, Casa DJ, Ganio MS, McDermott BP, et al. (2010) The American football uniform: uncompensable heat stress and hyperthermic exhaustion. J Athl Train 45: 117-127.
  53. Gilchrist J, Haileyesus T, Murphy M, Collins C, McIlvain N (2010) Heat illness among high school athletes-United States, 2005-2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 59: 1009-1013.
  54. Davis JK, Bishop PA, Zhang Y, Matt Green J, Casaru C, et al. (2012) Fluid balance, thermal stress, and post exercise response in women's Islamic athletic clothing. Eur J Appl Physiol 112: 725-734.
  55. Kenefick RW, Cheuvront SN, Sawka MN (2007) Thermoregulatory function during the marathon. Sports Med 37: 312-315.
  56. Davis JK, Bishop PA (2013) Impact of clothing on exercise in the heat. Sports Medicine 43: 695-706.
  57. Ha M, Yamashita Y, Tokura H (1995) Effects of moisture absorption by clothing on thermal responses during intermittent exercise at 24 degrees C. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 71: 266-271.
  58. Kwon A, Kato M, Kawamura H, Yanai Y, Tokura H (1998) Physiological significance of hydrophilic and hydrophobic textile materials during intermittent exercise in humans under the influence of warm ambient temperature with and without wind. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 78: 487-493.
  59. Schneider AM, Hoschke BN, Goldsmid JH (1992) Heat transfer through moist fabrics. Textile Research Journal 62: 61-66.
  60. Yasuda T, Miyama M, Muramoto A, Yasuda H (1994) Dynamic water vapor and heat transport through layered fabrics: Part III: Surface Temperature Change. Text Research Journal 64: 457-461.
  61. Ha M, Tokura H, Yanai Y, Moriyama T, Tsuchiya N (1999) Combined effects of fabric air permeability and moisture absorption on clothing microclimate and subjective sensation during intermittent exercise at 27 degrees C. Ergonomics 7: 964-979.
  62. Scheurell DM, Spivak SM, Hollies NRS (1985) Dynamic surface wetness of fabrics in relation to clothing comfort. Textile Research Journal 55: 394-399.
  63. Tokura H, Yamashita Y, Tomioka S (1982) The effects of moisture and water absorbency of fibers on the sweating rates of sedentary man in hot ambient environments: Objective Specification of Fabric Quality. Mechanical Properties and Performance. Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, Japan 407-417.
  64. Tokura H, Natsume K (1987) The effects of different clothing on human thermoregulation at an ambient temperature of 34 oC, Transactions of the Menzies Foundation. Menzies Foundation: Melbourne, Australia.
  65. Koyama I, Midorikawa-Tsukutani T, Tokura H (1997) Effects of different clothing on human thermophysiological responses and clothing microclimate under the influences of cyclic changes in environmental humidity: Thermal Physiology: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Thermal Physiology. Excerpta Medica: Amsterdam-New York, USA.
  66. Li Y, Holcombe BV (1993) Fiber hygroscopicity and thermoregulatory responses during exercise. in 2nd Asian Textile Conference, Seoul, Korea.
  67. Nielsen R, Endrusick TL (1993) Evaporation of sweat from the dressed man: Advances in industrial ergonomics and safety. Annual International Industrial Ergonomics and Safety Conference: Copenhagen, Denmark.
  68. Gavin TP, Babington JP, Harms CA, Ardelt ME, Tanner DA, et al. (2001) Clothing fabric does not affect thermoregulation during exercise in moderate heat. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 2124-2130.
  69. Dai XQ, Imamura R, Liu GL, Zhou FP (2008) Effect of moisture transport on microclimate under T-shirts. Eur J Appl Physiol 104: 337-340.
  70. Ding X (2008) Fabric permeability testing: Textile. WoodHead Publishing.
  71. Roberts BC, Waller TM, Caime MP (2007) Thermoregulatory response to base layer garments during treadmill exercise. Int J Sports Scie Eng 1: 29-38.
  72. Wingo JE, McMurray RG (2007) Cardiovascular and thermoregulatory responses to treadmill running while wearing shirts with different fabric composition. Biology of Sport 24: 177-187.
  73. Agnelli G (2004) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. Circulation 110: IV4-12.
  74. Simon DA, Dix FP, McCollum CN (2004) Management of venous leg ulcers. BMJ 328: 1358-1362.
  75. Perlau R, Frank C, Fick G (1995) The effect of elastic bandages on human knee proprioception in the uninjured population. Am J Sports Med 23: 251-255.
  76. Doan BK, Kwon YH, Newton RU, Shim J, Popper EM, et al. (2003) Evaluation of a lower-body compression garment. J Sports Sci 21: 601-610.
  77. Scanlan AT, Dascombe BJ, Reaburn PR, Osborne M (2008) The effects of wearing lower-body compression garments during endurance cycling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 3: 424-438.
  78. Houghton LA, Dawson B, Maloney SK (2009) Effects of wearing compression garments on thermoregulation during simulated team sport activity in temperate environmental conditions. J Sci Med Sport 12: 303-309.
  79. Duffield R, Portus M (2007) Comparison of three types of full-body compression garments on throwing and repeat-sprint performance in cricket players. Br J Sports Med 41: 409-414.
  80. Brzezinski S, Malinowska G, Nowak T (2005) High-Tech Sports Clothing With a High Comfort of Use Made from Multi-Layer Composite Materials. Fibers & Textiles in Eastern Europe 13: 90-93.
  81. Gavin TP (2003) Clothing and thermoregulation during exercise. Sports Med 33: 941-947.
  82. Yoo S, Kim E (2008) Effects of multilayer clothing system array on water vapor transfer and condensation in cold weather clothing ensemble. Textile Research Journal 78: 189-197.
  83. Faulkner SH, Ferguson RA, Gerrett N, Hupperets M, Hodder SG, et al. (2013) Reducing muscle temperature drop after warm-up improves sprint cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45: 359-365.
  84. Mondal S (2008) Phase change materials for smart textiles–An overview. Applied Thermal Engineering 28: 1536-1550.
  85. Maillet J, Lefebvre M, Boussu F, Pirlot M (2012) Innovative 3D Textile Structures for Soft Body Armor Protection: The EPIDARM Project: Intelligent Textiles and Clothing for Ballistic and NBC Protection. Springer, Netherlands 137-156.
  86. McLellan TM, Boscarino C, Duncan EJ (2013) Physiological strain of next generation combat uniforms with chemical and biological protection: importance of clothing vents. Ergonomics 56: 327-337.
  87. Bishop PA, Nunneley SA, Constable SH (1991) Comparisons of air and liquid personal cooling for intermittent heavy work in moderate temperatures. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 52: 393-397.
  88. Cadarette BS, Levine L, Staab JE, Kolka MA, Correa MM, et al. (2003) Upper body cooling during exercise-heat stress wearing the improved toxicological agent protective system for HAZMAT operations. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 64: 510-515.
  89. Cadarette BS, Cheuvront SN, Kolka MA, Stephenson LA, Montain SJ, et al. (2006) Intermittent microclimate cooling during exercise-heat stress in US army chemical protective clothing. Ergonomics 49: 209-219.
  90. Flouris AD, Cheung SS (2006) Design and control optimization of microclimate liquid cooling systems underneath protective clothing. Ann Biomed Eng 34: 359-372.
  91. House JR, Lunt HC, Taylor R, Milligan G, Lyons JA, et al. (2013) The impact of a phase-change cooling vest on heat strain and the effect of different cooling pack melting temperatures. Eur J Appl Physiol 113: 1223-1231.
  92. Wickwire PJ, Bishop PA, Green JM, Richardson MT, Lomax RG, et al. (2009) Physiological and comfort effects of a commercial "cooling cap" worn under protective helmets. J Occup Environ Hyg 6: 455-459.
  93. McLellan TM, Daanen HA, Cheung SS (2013) Encapsulated environment. Compr Physiol 3: 1363-1391.
  94. Ross M, Abbiss C, Laursen P, Martin D, Burke L (2013) Precooling methods and their effects on athletic performance : a systematic review and practical applications. Sports Med 43: 207-225.
  95. McEntire SJ, Suyama J, Hostler D (2013) Mitigation and prevention of exertional heat stress in firefighters: a review of cooling strategies for structural firefighting and hazardous materials responders. Prehosp Emerg Care 17: 241-260.
  96. DeGroot DW, Gallimore RP, Thompson SM, Kenefick RW (2013) Extremity cooling for heat stress mitigation in military and occupational settings. Journal of Thermal Biology 38: 305-310.
  97. Wang F, Lee H (2010) Evaluation of an electrically heated vest (EHV) using a thermal manikin in cold environments. Ann Occup Hyg 54: 117-124.
  98. Wang F, Gao C, Holmér I (2010) Effects of air velocity and clothing combination on heating efficiency of an electrically heated vest (EHV): a pilot study. J Occup Environ Hyg 7: 501-505.
Citation: Bishop PA, Balilonis G, Davis JK, Zhang Y (2013) Ergonomics and Comfort in Protective and Sport Clothing: A Brief Review. J Ergonomics S2:005.

Copyright: © 2013 Bishop PA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top