GET THE APP

Cytokines and the Metabolic Response to Surgery
Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology

Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9899

+44 1223 790975

Review Article - (2014) Volume 5, Issue 2

Cytokines and the Metabolic Response to Surgery

Elroy Patrick Weledji*
Senior lecturer in Anatomy and Clinical Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Cameroon
*Corresponding Author: Elroy Patrick Weledji, Senior lecturer in Anatomy and Clinical Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Cameroon, Tel: 0023799922144 Email:

Abstract

Immune response and metabolic regulation are highly integrated and the proper function of each is dependent on the other. Cytokines are helpful towards the host response but potentially hazardous if uncontrollable or in excess. This review evaluated the role of cytokines in the metabolic response to surgery and the association with the new insight of enhancing recovery after surgery. Surgery is a stressor that affects homeostasis. Excess cytokines cause insulin resistance and thus type- 2 diabetes through a complex immuno-physiological response to surgery. A precise understanding of the cytokine response to surgical trauma may bring in interventions that would optimise the perioperative care of the patient, decrease morbidity and enhance recovery.
Methods: Electronic searches of the medline (PubMed) database, Cochrane library and science citation index were performed to identify original published studies on cytokines and metabolism, and enhanced recovery after surgery. Relevant articles were searched from relevant chapters in specialized texts and all included.

Keywords: Cytokines; Metabolism; Surgical stress; Insulin resistance; Enhanced recovery

Introduction

Many metabolic and immune response pathways have been evolutionary conserved throughout species [1]. Cytokines are signalling peptides produced by inflammatory cells during injury. They initiate the acute phase response, recruit reticulo-endothelial cells (lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages), promote wound repair and induce the production of other cytokines (amplification of response) [2]. The complex network of cytokines balances pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects and an imbalance or the uncontrolled production of cytokines can result in inflammatory disease [1]. The new insight of enhancing recovery after major elective surgery is based on the principle of reducing metabolic stress in surgery by limiting the initiating factors- (1) cytokines produced from tissue injury and (2) stress hormones from the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) [3].

Surgical Stress

Claude Bernard in 1877 gave the first report on hyperglycaemia in stress from haemorrhage. Thus, disclosing the glycogenic function of the liver and the drastic change in biological thought of plants being the sole source of glycogen (Figure 1) [4]. In acute haemorrhage, insulin resistance is needed to mobilize glucose to achieve fluid movements and plasma refill [5]. In the 20th century, this hyperglycaemia in stress was termed ‘diabetes of injury’ which is a type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes. It is known that insulin resistance a marker of surgical stress and cytokine hypersecretion stimulate insulin resistance [6]. The principal mechanism by which the inflammatory signals interfere with insulin action involves post translational modification of insulin receptor substrate molecules particularly via serine phosphorylation. The enzyme c- Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is a central mediator [7]. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) plays a central role in integrating multiple metabolic signals critical in cellular homeostasis. Therefore conditions that challenge ER function such as hyperglycaemia in surgical stress would induce ER stress and increase serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 in an inositol requiring and JNK –dependent manner and thus block insulin action [8]. In mice, compromising ER function through targeted mutations in the Xbp-1 gene results in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes that are also dependent on JNK activation [8]. Modulation of ER function by chemical chapeyrones, phenyl butyric acid and taurine-conjugated ursodeoxycholic acid led to markedly enhanced insulin receptor signalling in peripheral tissues and restored proper insulin function [1,9].

cellular-immunology-Claude-Bernard

Figure 1: Claude Bernard (1813-1878).

Surgical stress occurs, before, during and after an operative procedure. It is the end result of a variety of stimuli evoked by psychological stress, tissue injury, alterations in circulation, anaesthetic agents and postoperative complications such as sepsis [10]. The cytokines and stress hormones are mutually related as the stress hormones are produced following the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) axis stimulation by the cytokines. Glucocorticoids play an important paradoxical dual role by its permissive fashion in initiating the host response by facilitating the elaboration of the various acute phase proteins produced by the liver from cytokine (interleukins-1,6) stimulation. They also inhibit cytokine production later as it remains elevated thus attenuating the homeostatic response [10]. Likewise while minor operations may stimulate the immune response the predominant effect of major surgery is immunodepression [1,11].

Afferent nerve impulse

Afferent nerve impulses to the brain are triggered not only by pain but by cytokines produced from inflammatory cells in the wound. Pro-inflammatory (interleukins IL-1,6,8, tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and anti-inflammatory (interleukin-IL-10) cytokines are released into the systemic circulation to cause a myriad of systemic effects- the acute phase response. These include fever, leucocytosis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis stimulation of the catabolic hormones, acute phase protein synthesis in the liver and immune activation [10].

Immunological changes

There are selective immunosuppressive effects during surgical stress. Injury, haemorrhage and endotoxin result in the release of a number of key cytokines (prostaglandin (PG) E2 and transforming growth factor TGFβ), and have profound effect on monocyte function [1,2]. Cytokine secretion by T-lymphocytes is suppressed after major surgery giving rise to an increased susceptibility to infection with intracellular pathogens such as listeria and mycobacteria [12]. Prostaglandin (PG) E2 is principally immunosuppressive. It prevents the production and release of cytokines- interleukin (IL-2) and interferon (IFNγ) by the Th1 subclass of T helper lymphocytes following surgical trauma or traumatic injury [2,13]. PGE2 is also capable of stimulating Th2 subclass to produce the cytokines IL- 4 and IL-10 which inhibit Th1 cytokine production during surgical injury (Figure 2). IL-10 down regulates the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules on the surface of monocytes and T cells. Transforming growth factor (TGFβ) also down regulates cellular processes by stimulating the Th2 subsets [2]. Lack of Th17 subset of T helper cells which are developmentally distinct from Th1 and Th2 cells, and producing interleukin 17(IL-17) leaves a host susceptible to opportunistic infections. The key anti-inflammatory cytokines, PGE2 and TGF beta controls Th17 differentiation and thus interleukin 17 (IL-17) secretion that provides anti-microbial immunity at epithelial/ mucosal barriers against candida and staphylococcus [14].

cellular-immunology-surgical-trauma

Figure 2: Summary of the selective cytokine interactions in surgical trauma [2,14]. PGE2: Prostaglandin E2; TGFβ: Transforming Growth Factor; IL-1: Interleukin1; IL-2: Interleukin-2; IL-4: Interleukin 4; IL-6: Interleukin 6; IL-8: Interleukin 8; IL-10: Interleukin 10; IFNγ: Gamma Interferon; Th1: T helper lymphocyte subset 1; Th2: T helper lymphocyte subset 2.

The transcription of gene for IL-10 is up regulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the down regulation of MHC class II expression follows major resectional surgery [15]. The expression of MHC class II antigens is a marker of monocyte activation and the capacity to engulf opsonised organisms [16]. Down regulation correlates with clinical outcome and the development of infection following surgery due to defect in neutrophil chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and lysosomal enzyme contents [17]. Thus it seemed reasonable to attempt to adjust this MHC class II antigen level clinically by administering interferon (IFNγ). This may benefit those whose post-traumatic MHC class II recovery was delayed or did not recover at all. The first reported trial of treatment of trauma patients with recombinant human interferon provided supportive but not statistically significant data [18]. The multiplicity of factors that influence the outcome of major surgery and the variability of the individual’s response especially with regard to their initial level of receptor expression will confound the effect [2,19].

Although the increased anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) secretion by monocytes after major surgery may be a homeostatic response it would be interesting to know how much of these may be the effect of the hyperglycaemia (diabetes) of injury [1,2]. This is corroborated by the observation that cytokine secretion by monocytes decrease following preoperative carbohydrate loading but increase in fasting [20]. Despite the major impact of prophylactic antibiotics, the overall incidence of sepsis after elective surgery remains static (5-10%) [2,10]. Though technical factors may play a part this residual sepsis may be a reflection of perturbation of the immune system due to surgical stress (Table 1) [1,2]. Because many operations are accompanied by haemorrhage, the postoperative immune depression may also be caused in part by blood loss and cellular hypoxia rather than surgery [5]. Perioperative blood transfusion may also contribute to immunosuppression but the underlying mechanism is largely unknown [21].

Pro-inflammatory Anti-inflammatory Acute phase reactants
Tumour necrosis factor (TNFα) Interleukin-10 (IL-10) αchymotrypsin
Interleukin-1 (IL-1) Prostaglandin E2(PGE2) Complement C3
Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Transforming growth factor (TGFβ) Caeruloplasmin
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Interleukin-4 (IL-4) Fibrinogen
Interleukin-8 (IL-8)   haptoglobin
Interferon (IFNγ)   C-reactive protein (CRP)

Table 1: Cytokines.

Acute phase response

The positive acute phase reactants (cytokines) rise during the acute phase response to surgical trauma. These include α chymotrypsin, complement (C3), caeruloplasmin, fibrinogen, haptoglobin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). The negative reactants are the normal response to trauma with decreased protein synthesis, and the levels decline during the same period. These include albumin and transferrin. The reason for the acute phase reactants is for host defence. C3 and CRP are required by phagocytic cells for opsonisation, fibrinogen is essential for blood coagulation and proteases limit tissue destruction. The serum levels rise during the first 24-48 hrs after surgery is proportional to the severity of injury. It falls back to normal after 48-96 hrs but may remain elevated in presence of sepsis or other complications [10]. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a massive systemic reaction arising from a variety of insults. The evolution of cytokine cascade leads to sustained activation of the reticuloendothelial system and elaboration of cell damaging secondary mediators such as nitric oxide, arachidonic metabolites (prostaglandins and leukotrienes), oxygen free radicals, platelet activating factor causing platelet aggregation, vasodilatation and increased capillary permeability. The clinical response of SIRS includes 2 or more of the following (temperature>38°C or <36°C; heart rate (HR)>90 beats/min; respiratory rate (RR)>20 breaths/min; white cell count (WCC) >12 or <4 × 109 C [1,10].

Metabolic response

The afferent stimuli from tissue injury produces neurohumoral responses in the form of cytokines and the stress hormones (adrenaline, glucagon, cortisol, growth hormone) that rapidly stimulate a cardiovascular and metabolic response. The metabolic response has a short ebb phase and a long flow phase. The short ebb phase lasting 12 to 24 hours is the period of traumatic shock with general depression of enzymatic activity and oxygen consumption. The blood pressure, cardiac output and body temperature are reduced. These are often associated with haemorrhage and result in hypoperfusion and lactic acidosis. As the blood volume is restored, more accelerated responses occur (the flow phase) in which the patient exhibits an increase in total energy requirement [10,22]. The flow phase has an initial catabolic phase which is of most concern in the management of the operated or injured patient and lasts for 3-8 days. Muscle and fat stores are plundered in order to maintain adequate energy for the whole organism. This is followed by an anabolic (recovery) phase which is now influenced by the anabolic hormone, insulin. The anabolic phase lasts for some weeks as protein and fat stores are restored and weight regained [22]. In the catabolic phase, adrenaline produced from the adrenal medulla by sympathetic nervous system stimulation mobilises protein and fat causing an increased urinary nitrogen excretion with consequent negative nitrogen balance and weight loss. There is an increased glucose production from glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis from proteins stimulated by glucagon. Insulin secretion increases but its sensitivity decreases because of the inhibitory action of adrenaline and glucagon. All these gives rise to hyperglycaemia (‘diabetes’ of injury) [22,23]. Insulin resistance rises with the magnitude of the injury. For example it is lower in major surgical procedures such as major colorectal operations, up to 90% of the pre-operative insulin sensitivity can be lost after the operation [6]. This change in metabolism lasts for well over a week which is the average length of the catabolic phase of the metabolic response [10,22].

The catabolic period of the flow phase is of most concern in the management of the operated or injured patient. Factors that modify the metabolic response affect the magnitude and duration of the response. These include the severity of the injury as the greater the injury the greater the response; the nature of the injury as for example burns which produce a greater response because of greater heat and fluid loss from the burn area; infection and other complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism which prolong the catabolic phase, and prolonged post trauma starvation that adversely affects convalescence. Anaesthesia and drugs modify the response by affecting the vascular system and hormone (catecholamine and anti-diuretic hormone) production (Table 2) [10,22]. Favourable factors would include (a) spinal or even better epidural that specifically block the afferent pain pathway with less hypotensive side-effect from sympathetic blockage in the latter, (b) meticulous and gentle tissue handling during operation which reduces the amount of trauma and post operative metabolic demand, (c) prompt and adequate fluid replacement which limits the liberation catecholamines, aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone, (d) the provision of enough calories and protein during the catabolic phase to prevent the negative nitrogen balance seen in the undernourished, severe trauma and sepsis (Table 3) [22].

1 Severity of injury
2 Nature of injury
3 Surgical complications (infections, DVT, PE)
4 Anaesthesia and drugs

Table 2: Factors that potentiate the metabolic response.

1 Spinal/epidural anaesthesia
2 Minimally-invasive surgery
3 Meticulous and gentle tissue handling intra-operatively
4 Prompt and adequate fluid replacement
5 Preoperative and early postoperative feeding

Table 3: Factors that attenuate the metabolic response.

Insulin resistance is one of the key mechanisms by which several common surgical complications are triggered as hyperglycaemia increases complications and mortality [6-8]. The endoplasmic reticulum, stress and the related signalling networks present a central mechanism underlying the inflammatory response and insulin resistance [1,7,8]. The glucose overload in the mitochondria blocks glycolysis and Kreb’s cycle resulting in further cytokine release and thus a vicious cycle (Figure 3) [24,25]. The organs affected are those with no insulin receptors nor storage capacity and thus an uncontrolled inflow of glucose. Glucose uptake is simply dependent on glucose level. These are the kidneys, the endothelial of blood vessels and heart, blood cells and neural tissue. Organs not affected (muscle and fat) have insulin receptors and storage capacity and thus has control of glucose inflow [26,27]. The early (within days) postoperative complications of hyperglycaemia [28]. The late (years) complications include type 2 diabetes especially in borderline, genetically or predisposed individuals, cardiovascular effects, renal failure, ventilatory support and polyneuropathy [26-29]. The ‘diabetes of injury’ is quick to manifest but also responds drastically to insulin treatment as compared to ordinary (atraumatic) patients with non-insulin dependent (type 2) diabetes [3,6].

cellular-immunology-vicious-cycle

Figure 3: The vicious cycle of the stress of surgery.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery

The independent factors predicting length of hospital stay are (a) type of surgery (70%), (b) perioperative blood loss and (c) postoperative insulin resistance [3,6,30]. The main concept in enhanced recovery after major elective surgery is reducing surgical stress. This new insight is manifested by avoiding the stress hormones using thoracic epidural anaesthesia and minimally invasive (laparascopic) surgery; avoiding stress-induced hyperglycaemia by pre-operative anabolic setting of the patient and avoiding fasting; treating hyperglycaemia with insulin; postoperative pain control with epidural analgesia and early postoperative feeding and mobilisation (Figure 2) [31-33]. Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative insulin resistance by 45% due to blockage of afferent pain impulses and increases gut motility as compared to intravenous opioids which decrease gut motility [34]. By reducing surgical stress and hence minimising the catabolic response and insulin resistance, the patient including the high risk with comorbidity, the hospital and the community benefits [35,36]. The enhanced recovery programme being based on surgical physiology is the next revolution in surgical care following laparoscopy [37].

Conclusions

It has been a long way from Claude Bernard to the new insight of enhanced recovery after surgery. Further insight into the endoplasmic reticulum central mechanism underlying inflammatory and stress responses would offer potential new therapeutic opportunities against insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. A precise understanding of the cytokine response to surgical trauma may be exploited therapeutically to optimise the perioperative care of the patient, decrease morbidity and enhance recovery.

References

  1. Hotamisligil GS (2006) Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature 444: 860-867.
  2. Guillou PJ (1995) Adjuvant biological response modifiers after major surgery or trauma. Br J Surg 82: 721-723.
  3. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, et al. (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144: 961-969.
  4. Ljungqvist O, Alibegovic A (1994) Hyperglycaemia and survival after haemorrhage. Eur J Surg 160: 465-469.
  5. Thorell A, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O (1999) Insulin resistance: a marker of surgical stress. CurrOpinClinNutrMetab Care 2: 69-78.
  6. Vallerie SN, Furuhashi M, Fucho R, Hotamisligil GS (2008) A predominant role for parenchymal c-Jun amino terminal kinase (JNK) in the regulation of systemic insulin sensitivity. PLoS One 3: e3151.
  7. Hotamisligil GS (2005) Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase pathways in inflammation and origin of obesity and diabetes. Diabetes 54 : S73-78.
  8. Ozcan U, Yilmaz E, Ozcan L, Furuhashi M, Vaillancourt E, et al. (2006) Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Science 313: 1137-1140.
  9. Carey DP, Roy MK, Delicata RJ, Mahadevan A (1999) Response to surgical trauma. In: Monson J, Duthie G, O’MalleyK (eds), Surgical emergencies. Blackwell publishers, USA, p: 25-36.
  10. Brune IB, Wilke W, Hensler T, Holzmann B, Siewert JR (1999) Downregulation of T helper type 1 immune response and altered pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory T cell cytokine balance following conventional but not laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg 177: 55-60.
  11. Hershman MJ, Cheadle WG, Wellhausen SR, Davidson PF, Polk HC Jr (1990) Monocyte HLA-DR antigen expression characterizes clinical outcome in the trauma patient. Br J Surg 77: 204-207.
  12. de Waal Malefyt R, Haanen J, Spits H, Roncarolo MG, teVelde A, et al. (1991) Interleukin-10 (IL-10) and viral IL-10 strongly reduce antigen –specific human t cell proliferation by diminishing thr antigen-presenting capacity of monocytes via down regulation of class II major histocompatibility complex expression. J Exp Med174:915-924.
  13. Ouyang W, Kolls JK, Zheng Y (2008) The biological functions of T helper 17 cell effector cytokines in inflammation. Immunity 28: 454-467.
  14. Wakefield CH, Carey PD, Foulds S, Monson JR, Guillou PJ (1993) Changes in major histocompatibility complex class II expression in monocytes and T cells of patients developing infection after surgery. Br J Surg 80: 205-209.
  15. Miller-Graziano CL, Szabo G, Griffey K, Mehta B, Kodys K, et al. (1991) Role of elevated monocyte transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta) production in posttrauma immunosuppression. J ClinImmunol 11: 95-102.
  16. Ayala A, Lehman DL, Herdon CD, Chaudry IH (1994) Mechanism of enhanced susceptibility to sepsis following hemorrhage. Interleukin-10 suppression of T-cell response is mediated by eicosanoid-induced interleukin-4 release. Arch Surg 129: 1172-1178.
  17. Polk HC Jr, Cheadle WG, Livingston DH, Rodriguez JL, Starko KM, et al. (1992) A randomized prospective clinical trial to determine the efficacy of interferon-gamma in severely injured patients. Am J Surg 163: 191-196.
  18. Babineau TJ, Hackford A, Kenler A, Bistrian B, Forse RA, et al. (1994) A phase II multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of three dosages of an immunomodulator (PGG-glucan) in high-risk surgical patients. Arch Surg 129: 1204-1210.
  19. Nygren J (2006) The metabolic effects of fasting and surgery. Best Pract Res ClinAnaesthesiol 20: 429-438.
  20. Brand A (2002) Immunological aspects of blood transfusions. TransplImmunol 10: 183-190.
  21. Weledji EP, Assob JC (2012) The systemic response to surgical trauma-a review. East and Central African Journal of Surgery 17: 3-12.
  22. Ljungqvist O (2010) Insulin resistance and outcomes in surgery. J ClinEndocrinolMetab 95: 4217-4219.
  23. Thorell A, Nygren J, Essén P, Gutniak M, Loftenius A, et al. (1996) The metabolic response to cholecystectomy: insulin resistance after open compared with laparoscopic operation. Eur J Surg 162: 187-191.
  24. Souba WW (1994) Cytokine control of nutrition and metabolism in critical illness. CurrProblSurg 31: 577-643.
  25. Brownlee M (2005) The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. Diabetes 54: 1615-1625.
  26. Sato H, Carvalho G, Sato T, Lattermann R, Matsukawa T, et al. (2010) The association of preoperative glycemic control, intraoperative insulin sensitivity, and outcomes after cardiac surgery. J ClinEndocrinolMetab 95: 4338-4344.
  27. Van den Berghe G, Bouillon R, Mesotten D (2009) Glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 361: 89.
  28. Khaodhiar L, McCowen K, Bistrian B (1999) Perioperative hyperglycemia, infection or risk? CurrOpinClinNutrMetab Care 2: 79-82.
  29. Carton EG, Phelan DM (1999) Perioperative management of the emergency patient. In: Monson J, Duthie G, O’Malley K (eds), Surgical emergencies. Blackwell publishers, USA, p: 37-48.
  30. Ljungqvist O,Hausel J, Nygren J, Thorel A, Soop M, et al. (2007) Preoperative patient preparation for enhanced recovery after surgery. TransfusAlternTransfus Med 9: 45-49.
  31. Wang ZG, Wang Q, Wang WJ, Qin HL (2010) Randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of preoperative oral carbohydrate versus placebo on insulin resistance after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97: 317-327.
  32. Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J GastrointestSurg 13: 569-575.
  33. Uchida I, Asoh T, Shirasaka C, Tsuji H (1988) Effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative insulin resistance as evaluated by insulin clamp technique. Br J Surg 75: 557-562.
  34. Ahmed J, Lim M, Khan S, McNaught C, Macfie J (2010) Predictors of length of stay in patients having elective colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery protocol. Int J Surg 8: 628-632.
  35. Boulind CE,Yeo M, Burkill C, Witt A, James E, et al. (2012) Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Colorectal Dis 14: 103-110.
  36. Slim K (2011) Fast-track surgery: the next revolution in surgical care following laparoscopy. Colorectal Dis 13: 478-480.
Citation: Weledji EP (2014) Cytokines and the Metabolic Response to Surgery. J Clin Cell Immunol 5:197.

Copyright: © 2014 Weledji EP, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top