Consented Autopsy-Never-Failing yet Ever Falling
Journal of Medical & Surgical Pathology

Journal of Medical & Surgical Pathology
Open Access

ISSN: 2472-4971

+44 1223 790975

Short Communication - (2016) Volume 1, Issue 3

Consented Autopsy-Never-Failing yet Ever Falling

Angus Turnbull1*# and Michael Osborn2#
1Imperial College School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, UK
2Department of Cellular Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
#Contributed equally to this work
*Corresponding Author: Angus Turnbull, Imperial College School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK, Tel: +447535650914 Email:


Consented autopsy has facilitated medical advances for five millennia and continues to deliver in modern 21st century medicine. Despite the extensive worldwide decline in consented autopsy over recent decades many studies demonstrate their continual importance in many domains of medicine including diagnostics, clinical correlation, pathogenesis research, education and benefits to the grieving family. The medical community must decide if this tried and tested method should be reinvigorated or left to fade into medical history.

Keywords: Autopsy; Post-mortem


Autopsy, derived from the Greek ‘autos’ and ‘opsomeri’ means ‘to see for oneself, and originates from mummification using human dissection around 3000BC. Over five millennia it has enabled the study of human anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology culminating in 21st century medicine. After such a rich and rewarding history, autopsy is on the brink of extinction.

During the 1980s, around 30% of adult inpatient deaths in the United Kingdom were followed with consented autopsy, yet by 2013 this figure had fallen to less than 1% [1]. The severity of this decline has led to the extinction of consented autopsy in 25% of hospitals in the UK [1]. Marked declines have been noted around the globe [1-4].

The decline in autopsy has been driven by the development of various misconceptions within the medical profession that began to develop in the latter half of the 20th century. Chief amongst these are the beliefs that modern diagnostic techniques are infallible and that attempts to obtain consent from believed families are rarely successful. In reality, the autopsy remains a valuable means for advancing modern medicine.

Consented Autopsy in the 21st Century

Despite advances in radiology and diagnostics, misdiagnosis remains an unavoidable frequent recurrence with devastating consequences [5-7]. Recent studies highlight that 28% of deceased Intensive Care Patients had at least one misdiagnosis and that diagnostic errors, which would have influenced management and may have altered prognosis (type 1 diagnostic error), were found in 8% [6]. A similar situation is found in paediatric and neonatal medicine with around 20% of cases report diagnostic errors, 4.5% being type 1 error [8]. Clearly modern diagnostics are far from infallible; consented autopsy highlights common and serious misdiagnoses which enable clinical audit, case reports, mortality meetings and ultimately improvements in patient safety and care. The frequency of misdiagnoses surrounding death is likely to have consequences on death certificates and therefore potentially skew mortality statistics and resource allocations.

Consented autopsy provides an invaluable platform for medical research. In recent years autopsy has aided in our understanding of pathological mechanisms in sepsis, Alzheimer’s disease, depression and influenza [1,9-12]. These benefits continue to the present day where autopsy has been influential in our growing knowledge of Zika Virus and its association with microcephaly [13]. Furthermore, fetal consented autopsy has repeatedly aided in our understanding of congenital abnormalities [14,15], pre-natal pathological-radiological correlation [16] and genetic counselling [17].

The educational benefits of autopsy extend to undergraduate and postgraduate trainees. Declining consented autopsy has impacted medical education - few autopsies are now observed despite their ability to improve deductive clinical reasoning and problem solving skills amongst medical students-the ultimate effect will be felt by future patients [18]. Traditional hospital autopsy provides a platform for all medical professionals to improve clinicopathological correlation and clinical effectiveness of treatment by discussing pathology reports [19].

Many physicians believe that consent for autopsy is difficult to achieve and hence the decline is an unavoidable inevitability - in practice experienced physicians are routinely able to obtain consent for autopsy (in up to 90% of cases) when families are approached [20]. This presumptive lack of consent is not only limiting medical advances but also having a negative impact on families. Autopsy may act as a means of closure to a grieving family, it can add meaning to a death and may highlight undiagnosed communicable and hereditary disease [21,22].


A combination of misconceptions surrounding consented autopsy has led to a worldwide decline in this hugely valuable technique to an extent that means autopsy is likely to become extinct within a generation, unless imminent action is taken. The media around the decline of the autopsy has been growing, the evidence has been mounting and the situation is becoming ever more pressing - today is the time for physicians and policy makers to work together to reinstate the importance of consented autopsy in 21st century medicine and enable it to become a routinely used diagnostic tool to benefit the safety of our patients.


  1. Turnbull A, Osborn M, Nicholas N (2015) Hospital autopsy: Endangered or extinct? J ClinPathol 68: 601-604.
  2. Gaensbacher S, Waldhoer T, Berzlanovich A (2012) The slow death of autopsies: a retrospective analysis of the autopsy prevalence rate in Austria from 1990 to 2009.Eur J Epidemiol 27: 577-580.
  3. Lunetta P, Lounamaa A, Sihvonen S (2007) Surveillance of injury-related deaths: medicolegal autopsy rates and trends in Finland.InjPrev 13: 282-284.
  4. Zhu MH, Yu DH (2011) Fluctuations in the rate of autopsy in China.Chin Med J (Engl) 124: 3403-3407.
  5. Costache M, Lazaroiu AM, Contolenco A, Costache D, George S, et al. (2014) Clinical or postmortem? The importance of the autopsy; a retrospective study.Maedica (Buchar) 9: 261-265.
  6. Winters B, Custer J, Galvagno SM Jr, Colantuoni E, Kapoor SG, et al. (2012) Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies.BMJ QualSaf 21: 894-902.
  7. Liao J, Singh H (2013) Reviving the Autopsy as a Diagnostic Error-Reduction Tool. LabMedicine 186-190.
  8. Custer JW, Winters BD, Goode V, Robinson KA, Yang T, et al. (2015) Diagnostic errors in the pediatric and neonatal ICU: a systematic review.PediatrCrit Care Med 16: 29-36.
  9. Lucas S (2007) The autopsy pathology of sepsis-related death. CurrDiagnPathol 13:375-388.
  10. Khan TK, Alkon DL (2010) Early diagnostic accuracy and pathophysiologic relevance of an autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease peripheral biomarker. Neurobiol Aging 31: 889-900.
  11. Chen B, Dowlatshahi D, MacQueen GM, Wang JF, Young LT (2001) Increased hippocampal BDNF immunoreactivity in subjects treated with antidepressant medication.Biol Psychiatry 50: 260-265.
  12. Mauad T, Hajjar LA, Callegari GD, da Silva LF, Schout D et al. (2010) Lung pathology in fatal novel human influenza A (H1N1) infection. Am J RespirCrit Care Med 181:72-79.
  13. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popovic M, Poljsak-Prijatelj M, et al. (2016) Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly.N Engl J Med 374: 951-958.
  14. Kar A, Kar T, Kanungo S, Guru L, Rath J, et al. (2015) Risk factors, organ weight deviation and associated anomalies in neural tube defects: A prospective fetal and perinatal autopsy series. Indian J PatholMicrobiol 58:285-291.
  15. Kidron D, Eidel J, Aviram R (2013) [Autopsies for fetal anomalies].Harefuah 152: 340-343, 368.
  16. Godbole K, Bhide V, Nerune S, Kulkarni A, Moghe M, et al. (2014) Role of fetal autopsy as a complementary tool to prenatal ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27:1688-1692.
  17. Nayak SS, Shukla A, Lewis L, Kadavigere R, Mathew M, et al. (2015) Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and its impact on genetic counseling.PrenatDiagn 35: 685-691.
  18. Tette E, Yawson AE, Tettey Y (2014) Clinical utility and impact of autopsies on clinical practice among doctors in a large teaching hospital in Ghana. Global Health Action 7:10.
  19. Tsitsikas DA, Brothwell M, Chin Aleong JA, Lister AT (2011) The attitudes of relatives to autopsy: a misconception.J ClinPathol 64: 412-414.
  20. Wilson ML (2006) Infectious diseases and the autopsy.Clin Infect Dis 43: 602-603.
Citation: Turnbull A, Osborn M (2016) Consented Autopsy-Never-Failing yet Ever Falling. J Med Surg Pathol 1:128.

Copyright: © 2016 Turnbull A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.