GET THE APP

Commentary on the Contribution to Greenhouse Gas Absorption by th
Forest Research: Open Access

Forest Research: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2168-9776

+44 1300 500008

Short Communication - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 4

Commentary on the Contribution to Greenhouse Gas Absorption by the Forestry Sector in Taiwan

Roberto L Salomon, Jesús Rodriguez-Calcerrada, Luis Gil and Maria Valbuena-Carabana*
ETS Forestry Engineering, Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research Group, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
*Corresponding Author: Maria Valbuena-Carabana, ETS Forestry Engineering, Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research Group, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria S/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain, Tel: +34913367113, Fax: +34913572293 Email:

Abstract

In Taiwan, 59% of area (i.e., 2.15 million ha, or 5.3 million acre) is covered by forests, less forested than some developed countries like Sweden (70%), Japan (67 percent) and South Korea (64 percent). More significantly, forest resources contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction and climate change mitigation by removing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and storing it in biomass and other carbon pools. According to the national GHG inventory, the percentage of contribution to GHG absorption by forestry sector in Taiwan are only about 7.4% based on total GHG emissions (284,514 kilotons of CO2 equivalents) in 2013. On the other hand, the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act (GGRMA) has been officially promulgated on 1 July 2015. In the paper, the author first described the brief of the GGRMA regarding the role in the Taiwan’s forestry sector. Thereafter, the contribution to GHG absorption by forestry sector in Taiwan was analyzed according to the “2015 Taiwan Greenhouse Gas Inventory“. Finally, some perspectives were addressed to enhance carbon sequestration by the forestry sector in Taiwan.

<

Keywords: Forestry sector; Taiwan; Carbon dioxide absorption; Forestry policy

Abbreviations

EA: Stem CO2 efflux to the atmosphere; EA-LEAF: Foliage CO2 efflux to the atmosphere; ES: Soil CO2 efflux; ES-ROOT: Root-respired CO2 that diffused to the atmosphere through soil; FT: Internal CO2 flux through xylem; RR: Root respiration; RS: Stem respiration.

Introduction

Quercus pyrenaica Willd is a vigorous root-resprouting species that has been intensively coppiced for firewood, charcoal and woody pastures for centuries. Nowadays, coppicing has mostly ceased, and symptoms of stand degradation-slow stem growth, branch dieback, and scarce acorn production-are widely observed [1]. Disproportionate respiratory costs of massive root systems grown after centennial coppicing have been suggested as a potential driver of Q. pyrenaica decay [2]; nevertheless, assessments on carbon expenditures in Q. pyrenaica have not been essayed to date, and causes for coppice stagnation remain unknown.

The quantification of the relative weight of respiratory sinks is crucial for a better understanding of tree carbon budgets [3-5]. However, our comprehension of respiratory processes, particularly of woody organs, is limited relative to our knowledge of photosynthesis [5,6]. In resprouting deciduous species, nonstructural carbohydrates are stored in large amounts in woody organs [7] that can contain a large proportion of living parenchyma [8]. The penalty in terms of respiratory carbon loss associated to storage tissues [9,10] could be of particular relevance in carbon budgets of the root-resprouting Q. pyrenaica , since long lasting coppicing might lead to disproportionate accumulation of resources in roots [11].

Trees of Q. pyrenaica long subjected to coppicing have developed massive systems of living roots (Figure 1) [11] that store but also may consume a great portion of carbohydrates assimilated aboveground. For a better understanding of the role of respiratory carbon loss in Q. pyrenaica decay, we gathered and extended previous published work on Q. pyrenaica biomass and respiration of woody tissues [11-14] to scale up stem and root respiration (RS and RR, respectively) to the tree and stand levels. We aimed to compare respiratory expenditures of above- and below-ground woody organs across one growing season, and in relation to other forests to provide an insight of the relative magnitude of carbon invested for respiration in Q. pyrenaica coppices. We expected RS and particularly RR to be important carbon sinks, and therefore high woody respiration and RR/RS ratios relative to other forest stands.

forest-research-Photograph-root-system

Figure 1: Photograph of the root system of a hydraulically excavated clone of Quercus pyrenaica located in the Monte Matas de Valsaín (Segovia, Spain).

Materials and Methods

To estimate annual respiratory loss of woody organs in a coppice system of Q. pyrenaica , we reviewed and reanalyzed our previous work on Q. pyrenaica root development and biomass [11], and internal and external stem CO2 fluxes [12-14], together with unpublished data of soil CO2 efflux. Data was obtained from eight stems belonging to a Q. pyrenaica clone located in the Monte Matas de Valsaín (Segovia, Spain). The clonal assignment of the stems was based on molecular markers [15,16]. Four 24 h long measurement campaigns were conducted across the growing season of 2013, at the end of which stems and roots were harvested for biomass quantification and scaling up of RS and RR to the tree and stand levels. The root system was hydraulically excavated with a high-pressure water pump down to 1 m depth over an 81 m2 area (Figure 1). Details on stand characteristics, aboveground features of the monitored stems, excavation methodology, and above and below-ground biomass measurements can be seen in our previosly published work [11].

Stem CO2 efflux to the atmosphere (EA) was measured in every stem at ground level (0.1 m) with a portable infrared gas analyzer (LI-6400, Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) and a soil chamber (LI-6400-09) [12,13]. Accumulated EA per tree was calculated by scaling up stem EA to functional woody biomass (i.e., sapwood and bark) of the eight stems and their branches. Stem respiration (RS) was estimated as the sum of EA and the internal CO2 flux through xylem (FT) [RS=EA+FT]. FT was calculated as the product of the sap flux and the CO2 dissolved in sap solution (sap [CO2 *]). Sap [CO2 *] was in turn estimated by Henry’s law from gas phase [CO2], sap temperature, and sap pH [13,17].

Soil CO2 efflux (ES) was measured in four collars located below the canopy of the clone with a portable infrared gas analyzer and a soil chamber [14]. Daily ES was averaged among collars on a soil surface area basis. Since roots extended beyond the excavated area (81 m2), a buffer of 0.63 m was added to estimate clonal extension (102 m2). This buffer distance was chosen to meet actual stand density (8 stems/102 m-2=784 stems ha-1≈781 stems ha-1=stand stem density) and scale up results to the stand level. RR was calculated as the sum of the rootrespired CO2 that diffused to the atmosphere through soil (ES-ROOT) and FT at the base of the stem [RR=ES-ROOT+FT] [18]. ES-ROOT was estimated from ES and the relative contribution of autotrophic respiration to ES. Seasonality of root autotrophic contribution to ES was obtained from two studies in a Mediterranean Quercus cerris coppice cut one [19] and 17 [20] years before respiration measurements; spring contributions reported in these studies were attributed to the first campaign (DOY 143-144), summer contributions to the second (DOY 183-184) and third (DOY 218-219) campaigns, and autumn contributions to the fourth campaign (266-267).

Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows seasonal and diel variation in EA, FT and ES on a soil surface area basis. The contribution of FT to total aboveground respiration was less than 10% [12], whereas FT belowground was 2% of the ES-ROOT [14]. This is in part due to low xylem [CO2] in Q. pyrenaica , lower than 0.5% on average, which is one order of magnitude lower than the [CO2] reported in other species using this methodology [21]. Averaged over the growing season, ES was the greatest respiratory flux to the ecosystem (39 mol CO2 clone-1 day-1), three and four times greater than RS (12 mol CO2 clone-1 day-1) and RR (8-9 mol CO2 clone-1 day-1), respectively (Figure 2) (Table 1). Due to the high magnitude of ES, the relative contribution of autotrophic respiration to ES substantially determined the root-to-shoot ratio of respiration (RR/RS). To illustrate this, the root contribution to ES reported for a Mediterranean oak coppice-ranging between 14 and 27% [19,20]-yielded RR/RS ratios ranging between 0.42 to 1.18 across the growing season (Table 1). Instead, if heterotrophic and autotrophic contributions to ES were considered equal, as generally assumed by some authors for different forest biomes [18,22], RR/RS would increase up to values ranging between 1.36 to 2.18.

forest-research-variations-stem-efflux

Figure 2: Diel variations in stem CO2 efflux to the atmosphere (EA), internal CO2 transport through xylem (FT) and soil CO2 efflux (ES) on four dates over the growing season in an abandoned coppice of Quercus pyrenaica . Fluxes registered from one stem segment and one soil collar intensively monitored (18 times day-1) are shown. Other stem segments and collars used to average EA, FT and ES are not displayed in this figure as they were monitored less intensively (4 times day-1). EA and FT data was obtained from previous published work [12] and expressed on a soil surface area basis. Shaded areas indicate night-time.

Campaign DOY EA RS ES RR RR/RS
mol CO2 clone-1 day-1
143-144 6.16 6.16 26.83 5.03 vs 7.25 0.82 vs 1.18
183-184 12.28 13.13 52.14 11.32 vs 11.70 0.86 vs 0.89
218-219 15.63 16.45 43.72 9.49 vs 9.82 0.58 vs 0.60
266-267 10.54 11.23 32.76 8.82 vs 4.68 0.79 vs 0.42
Mean 11.15 11.74 38.86 8.66 vs 8.36 0.76 vs 0.77

Table 1: Above- and below-ground fluxes of respired CO2 in an eightstemmed clone of Quercus pyrenaica . Stem CO2 efflux to the atmosphere (EA), soil CO2 efflux (ES), and stem and root respiration (RS and RR, respectively) were measured during four 24-hours campaigns throughout 2013 growing season. RR was calculated as the product of ES multiplied by the autotrophic contribution to ES. Autotrophic contribution to ES was obtained from two reports of a Mediterranean coppice of Quercus cerris cut one [19] and 17 years [20] before measurements. Estimations of RR and RR/RS ratios from contributions reported in both studies (recently coppiced vs mature stand) are shown.

Above- and below-ground functional woody biomass was similar in the surveyed clone: 1026 Kg above-ground and 972 Kg below-ground [11]. Consequently, seasonal deviations of RR/RS from unity reflected differences in the metabolic activity between below- and above-ground organs over time. The relatively high ratio of RR/RS above one during spring (Table 1) may be explained by earlier growth of roots than stems [23], particularly by intense fine root growth and belowground cambial activity for root elongation in spring [24]. The progressive decrease in RR/RS observed onward (ratios below one) may result from a gradual reduction in the root activity, relative to enhanced aboveground metabolism. In other oak coppices the highest root contribution to ES was registered on the dormant season [19,20], which would support a major role of belowground respiration and relatively high RR/RS during winter. Nonetheless, the fact that RR/RS ratios below one were predominantly observed along the growing season evidenced an unexpected high weight of aboveground woody respiration as a carbon sink. The accumulation of woody biomass in stems and branches in this over-aged coppice (cut for the last time around 1967), together with the remarkably high proportion of living parenchyma observed in Q. pyrenaica stems [8], contribute to high woody respiratory costs above ground.

Annual respiratory fluxes were compared with those reported in 15 other studies for different forest stands (Table S1). Leaf area index (LAI), a key eco-physiological determinant of carbon gas exchange [25], was also considered for comparison. Average ES, EA and LAI across the stands were 776 g Cm-2year-1, 162 g Cm-2year-1 and 4.2 m2m-2, respectively. In our site, ES and EA scaled up to the stand and the whole year were 1164.2 and 297.0 gCm-2year-1, respectively, values 1.5 and 1.8 times higher than those averaged across 15 different stands, suggesting greater carbon losses from soil and stem respiration in the studied Q. pyrenaica coppice. Meanwhile, LAI in our site was 3.8, a value that falls within the reported range for this species [26] and for the genus Quercus [25], and slightly lower than that averaged across different forest types (Table S1).

In conclusion, the relative importance of roots and stems as carbon sinks shifted along the growing season in accordance to their phenology and metabolic activity. The overall respiratory carbon losses from both woody organs were high in comparison with values exhibited by other species. Relatively high values of EA, together with slightly low values of LAI point to an unexpected high importance of aboveground woody respiration in carbon budgets of Q. pyrenaica coppice stands. It also supports the hypothesis of a physiological imbalance between carbon sources and sinks as a causal factor of poor aboveground tree performance in most Q. pyrenaica stands previously coppiced [11,14,16,27]. Nonetheless, temporal patterns of leaf carbon exchange and heterotrophic and autotrophic components of ES should be analyzed in future studies to elucidate the role of root-to-shoot imbalance in Q. pyrenaica coppice decline. A greater number of monitored individuals across several Q. pyrenaica coppices will also provide stronger empirical support to this hypothesis, given that our scaling up from eight stems to the stand level should be taken with caution, and that only one surveyed site hinders statistical comparisons.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Javier Donés for economic and logistical support. We also thank Elena Zafra, Guillermo González, César Otero, Manuel Iglesias, Paula Guzman, Aida Rodríguez, Jose Carlos Miranda, Rosa Ana López, Eva María Miranda and Matías Millerón for their enthusiastic help with field work. This work was funded by the Comunidad de Madrid through CAM P2009/AMB-1668 and P2013/ MAE-2760 projects and by the Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales through PPNN 1148/201 project. Salomón RL was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship from the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Jesús Rodríguez-Calcerrada was supported by a Juan de la Cierva contract from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.

References

  1. Serrada R, Bravo JA (2012) Mejora de la vitalidad de las masas. In: Vericat P, Piqué M, Serrada R (eds.) Gestión adaptativa al cambio global en masas de Quercus mediterráneos. Solsona (Lleida): Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya, Spain, pp: 49-66.
  2. Bravo JA, Roig S, Serrada R (2008) Selvicultura en montes bajos y medios de Quercus ilex L., Q. pyrenaica Willd. y Q. faginea Lam. In: Serrada R, Montero G (eds.) Compendio de Selvicultura aplicada en España. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Spain, pp: 657-744.
  3. Waring R, Landsberg J, Williams M (1998) Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiol 18: 129-134.
  4. Amthor J (2000) The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later. Ann Bot 86: 1-20.
  5. Rambal S, Lempereur M, Limousin JM, Martin-StPaul NK, Ourcival JM, et al. (2014) How drought severity constrains gross primary production (GPP) and its partitioning among carbon pools in a Quercus ilex coppice? Biogeosciences 11: 6855-6869.
  6. Guidolotti G, Rey A, Andrea DE, Matteucci G, De Angelis P (2013) Effect of environmental variables and stand structure on ecosystem respiration components in a Mediterranean beech forest. Tree Physiol 33: 960-972.
  7. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001) Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 45-51.
  8. Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, López R, Salomón R, Gordaliza G, Valbuena-Carabaña M, et al. (2015) Stem CO2 efflux in six co-occurring tree species: underlying factors and ecological implications. Plant Cell Environ 38: 1104-1115.
  9. Landhäusser SM, Lieffers VJ (2002) Leaf area renewal, root retention and carbohydrate reserves in a clonal tree species following above-ground disturbance. J Ecol 90: 658-665.
  10. Drake PL, Mendham DS, White DA, Ogden GN (2009) A comparison of growth, photosynthetic capacity and water stress in Eucalyptus globulus coppice regrowth and seedlings during early development. Tree Physiol 29: 663-674.
  11. Salomón R, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, Zafra E, Morales-Molino C, Rodríguez-García A, et al. (2016) Unearthing the roots of degradation of Quercus pyrenaica coppices: A root-to-shoot imbalance caused by historical management? For Ecol Manage 363: 200-211.
  12. Salomón RL, Valbuena-Carabaña M, Gil L, McGuire MA, Teskey RO, et al. (2016) Temporal and spatial patterns of internal and external stem CO2 fluxes in a sub-Mediterranean oak. Tree Physiol.
  13. Salomón R, Valbuena-Carabaña M, Teskey R, McGuire MA, Aubrey D, et al. (2016) Seasonal and diel variation in xylem CO2 concentration and sap pH in sub-Mediterranean oak stems. J Exp Bot 67: 2817-2827.
  14. Salomón R, Valbuena-Carabaña M, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, Aubrey D, McGuire M, et al. (2015) Xylem and soil CO2 fluxes in a Quercus pyrenaica Willd. coppice: root respiration increases with clonal size. Ann For Sci 72: 1065-1078.
  15. Valbuena-Carabaña M, Gil L (2013) Genetic resilience in a historically profited root sprouting oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) at its southern boundary. Tree Genet Genomes 9: 1129-1142.
  16. Salomón R, Valbuena-Carabaña M, Gil L, González-Doncel I (2013) Clonal structure influences stem growth in Quercus pyrenaica Willd. coppices: Bigger is less vigorous. For Ecol Manage 296: 108-118.
  17. McGuire MA, Teskey RO (2002) Microelectrode technique for in situ measurement of carbon dioxide concentrations in xylem sap of trees. Tree Physiol 22: 807-811.
  18. Aubrey DP, Teskey RO (2009) Root-derived CO2 efflux via xylem stream rivals soil CO2 efflux. New Phytol 184: 35-40.
  19. Rey A, Pegoraro E, Tedeschi V, De Parri I, Jarvis PG, et al. (2002) Annual variation in soil respiration and its components in a coppice oak forest in Central Italy. Glob Chang Biol 8: 851-866.
  20. Tedeschi V, Rey A, Manca G, Valentini R, Jarvis PJ, et al. (2006) Soil respiration in a Mediterranean oak forest at different developmental stages after coppicing. Glob Chang Biol 12: 110-121.
  21. Teskey RO, Saveyn A, Steppe K, McGuire MA (2008) Origin, fate and significance of CO2 in tree stems. New Phytol 177: 17-32.
  22. Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48: 115-146.
  23. López B, Sabate S, Gracia CA (2001) Annual and seasonal changes in fine root biomass of a Quercus ilex L. forest. Plant Soil 230: 125-134.
  24. Courty PE, Bréda N, Garbaye J (2007) Relation between oak tree phenology and the secretion of organic matter degrading enzymes by Lactarius quietus ectomycorrhizas before and during bud break. Soil Biol Biochem 39: 1655-1663.
  25. Bréda N (2003) Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: A review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J Exp Bot 54: 2403-2417.
  26. Hernández-Santana V, Martínez-Vilalta J, Martínez-Fernández J, Williams M (2009) Evaluating the effect of drier and warmer conditions on water use by Quercus pyrenaica. For Ecol Manage 258: 1719-1730.
  27. Corcuera L, Camarero JJ, Sisó S, Gil-Pelegrín E (2006) Radial-growth and wood-anatomical changes in overaged Quercus pyrenaica coppice stands: functional responses in a new Mediterranean landscape. Trees 20: 91-98.
Citation: Tsai WT (2016) Commentary on the Contribution to Greenhouse Gas Absorption by the Forestry Sector in Taiwan. Forest Res 5:189.

Copyright: © 2016 Tsai WT. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top