Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapeutic Strategies: The Future of G
Immunome Research

Immunome Research
Open Access

ISSN: 1745-7580


Review - (2018) Volume 14, Issue 1

Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapeutic Strategies: The Future of Glioblastoma Management

Atsushi Natsume1* and Courtney Pendleton1,2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
2Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, USA
*Corresponding Author: Atsushi Natsume, Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, Tel: +81-52-744-2353, Fax: +81-52-744-2360 Email:


The field of adoptive cellular therapy, using autologous T-cells modified ex vivo to specifically target tumor cells prior to being reintroduced to the patient, has become a new focus of research endeavors searching for a novel and efficacious treatment for oncologic disease, including glioblastoma. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T-cells consist of a single chain variable fragment of a monoclonal antibody coupled with extant T-cell intracellular signaling cascade systems using a viral vector ex vivo. This provides the advantage of targeting tumor specific surface markers, while minimizing off-target effects and potential toxicity. Additionally, the CAR T-cells bypass the need for MHC-restricted presentation, a system which is frequently down-regulated in tumor cells. Among the surface antigens described as targets for CAR T-cell therapy for GBMs, Epidermal growth factor variant III (EGFRvIII), HER2 (HER2/neu, ERBB2), interleukin-13 receptor α2 subunit (IL-13Rα2), and erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma A2 (EphA2) are the leading options for tumor specific surface antigens to target with CAR-T cells. This article reviews history and advantages of CAR-T cell therapies, and discuss future directions.


Keywords: Glioma; CAR-T; EGFRvIII; HER2; IL-13Rα2; EphA2


Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most common primary brain tumor, with a universally poor prognosis. Advances in chemotherapy and radiation treatment protocols have improved survival, but the overall 5-year survival rate remains less than 10%. The use of immunomodulating therapies for the treatment of GBM has been of long interest to researchers and clinicians. The field of adoptive cellular therapy (ACT), using autologous immune cells modified ex vivo to target tumor cells prior to being reintroduced to the patient, has become a new focus of research endeavors searching for a novel and efficacious treatment for oncologic disease, including GBM [1]. These therapeutic strategies include a variety of non-specific immune cells, including lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), γδT cells, antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), and natural killer (NK) cells. However, the results of these research endeavors have been mixed, and concern remains regarding toxicity in non-tumor tissues. In an attempt to provide more tumor-specific immunomodulatory options, and minimize off-target effects, T-cells have been modified with chimeric antigen receptors allowing for specific targeting of tumor cells in a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies [2-6].

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Therapy Overview

The construction of CAR-modified T-cells has been extensively described; briefly, a single chain variable fragment (scFv) of a monoclonal antibody is coupled with extant T-cell intracellular signaling cascade systems using a viral vector ex vivo. This provides the advantage of targeting tumor specific surface markers, while minimizing off-target effects and potential toxicity. Additionally, the CAR T-cells bypass the need for MHC-restricted presentation, a system which is frequently down-regulated in tumor cells [7-9].

Potential limitations of CAR-modified T-cells include the need to target tumor surface markers, unlike other ACT therapies such as TCR therapy which can target extra- or intra-cellular tumor antigens. The activation of T-cells through CAR therapy may lead to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which has been reported in a number of studies, and may range from a mild to a serious complication [10-14].

History of CAR therapies

The initial development of CAR therapies in the late 1980s demonstrated cytotoxicity, which was supported by multiple clinical trials in a range of solid and hematologic malignancies [15]. These early attempts were further refined, creating single costimulatory domain (CD28 or 4-1BB) and double costimulatory domain (CD28 + OX40 or 4-1BB) constructs. These second and third generation CAR avoided a major pitfall of first generation CAR, namely the limited functional lifespan of CAR-T cells and the occurrence of quiescence in the absence of costimulatory signals. Clinical trials have demonstrated significant long-term disease free survival in patients with hematologic malignancies using second generation CAR-T cells [2,16], and both second and third generation CAR-T cells have been shown to be efficacious against murine glioma models [17-22].

CAR therapies for gliomas

There remains great interest in using CAR-T cell therapies to provide a novel adjuvant therapy for management of gliomas that may minimize the significant toxicity to non-tumor tissue that is a significant side effect of standard of care chemotherapy and radiation regimens. However, the microenvironment of GBMs is challenging for successful immune-modulating therapies, as tumor cells suppress the endogenous immune response systems, including T cell proliferation, CD8+ costimulatory signals, and MHC expansion. These factors have produced obstacles for adaptive cellular therapy to overcome; the MHC-independent nature of CAR-T cells provides an added benefit in the success of this therapy against GBMs (Figure 1).


Figure 1: Differences between conventional T cells and CAR-T cells. CAR-modified T-cells consist of a single chain variable fragment (scFv) of a monoclonal antibody coupled with extant T-cell intracellular signaling cascade systems. CAR T-cells bypass the need for MHC-restricted presentation. These early attempts were further refined, creating single costimulatory domain (CD28 or 4-1BB) and double costimulatory domain (CD28 + OX40 or 4-1BB) constructs overcoming the limited functional lifespan of CAR-T cells and the occurrence of quiescence in the absence of costimulatory signals.

Target Surface Markers for CAR-Therapies

EGFRvIII (epidermal growth factor variant III)

EGFRvIII is the most frequently occurring EGFR variant, found in a variety of malignancies, including GBM [23-25]. A deletion of exons 3-6 of the extracellular domain results in a constitutively active tyrosine kinase, producing tumorigenic signals through the RTK/RAS/ PI3K pathway; notably, the type III variant is frequently expressed in GBM cells but absent from non-tumor cells, providing an attractive CAR-T cell target that minimizes the risk of off-target cytotoxicity. Our group has previously developed a mouse mAb, 3C10 [26], and its scFv antibody that specifically recognizes the glycine residue of EGFRvIII [27]. We successfully generated human T cells expressing CAR targeting the EGFRvIII antigen using 3C10-scFv (3C10-CAR) [22]. Several CAR constructs targeting EGFRvIII, including 3C10-CAR, showed induction of IFN-γ production when added to EGFRvIII-expressing target cells [21], and stimulated tumor lysis in vitro and in vivo [20,22]. Humanized 3C10-CAR was subsequently generated to avoid a human anti-mouse antibody response, which restricts the persistence of 3C10-CAR-T cells and may cause anaphylaxis [28]. Phase I clinical trials of EGFRvIII-targeting CAR-T cell therapy for recurrent GBMs are currently underway (NCT01454596, NCT02209376).

Additionally, groups have explored the use of CAR-modified natural killer (NK) cells for treatment of GBM [29].

There are concerns, however, that the administration of CAR-T cells specific only for EGFRvIII may lead to surface antigen loss in the GBM cell population, thereby creating a tumor strain resistant to further therapy. This was seen in patients receiving EGFRvIII peptide vaccines, where 82% of patients had EGFRvIII null tumor cells at the time of recurrence [30].

HER2 (HER2/neu, ERBB2)

HER2 encodes a 185-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein with tyrosine-specific kinase activity, and is overexpressed in approximately 30% of breast cancer patients as well as in several other malignancies including GBM [31]. HER2 overexpression is associated with more aggressive disease and poor prognosis [32]. HER2 overexpression results in increased HER2 heterodimerization with EGFR and HER3; these heterodimers drive proliferation and invasion of cancer cells [33]. In addition, GBMs with low HER2 expression are postulated to arise through anaplastic transformation of low grade gliomas, making HER2 CAR-T cells a potential treatment specifically directed at patients with primary GBM [34].

Additionally, success of these cells in treating medulloblastoma has been demonstrated [6], making HER2-CAR-T cells a putative therapy for multiple CNS malignancies in both adult and pediatric populations.

Concerns remain regarding the safety of HER2-targeted CAR-T cells, as HER2 is expressed at low levels in some normal tissues, notably the lungs. Mortality was reported in a single patient who developed acute respiratory failure immediately following administration of HER2-CAR-T cells [35], which was postulated to be caused by localization of the CAR-T cells to the lungs with a subsequent massive cytokine release.

IL-13Rα2 (interleukin-13 receptor α2 subunit)

IL-13 binds to two receptors: IL-13Rα1 and IL-13Rα2. IL-13Rα1 forms a heterodimer with IL-4R and binds IL-13 ligand, triggering downstream signaling pathways. IL-13Rα2 is a monomer that lacks the signaling chain necessary to trigger IL-13 mediated pathways, and given the high affinity of IL-13 for IL-13Rα2, upregulation of this receptor serves to interfere with appropriate signal regulation, leading to more aggressive and invasive tumors [36,37]; IL-13Rα2 overexpression correlates with poor prognosis [38]. IL-13Rα2 is expressed specifically by tumor cells, although some expression in normal testis tissue has been documented. This makes it an attractive target for immunomodulating therapy, although off-target effects seen with other surface antigens must be anticipated and carefully monitored for in murine models [39-41].

IL-13-zetakine is a chimeric immunoreceptor using membranetethered IL-13 E13Y mutein for selective binding to IL-13Rα2. IL-13- zetakine T cells induced T cell proliferation and secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α, and demonstrated antitumor activity when co-cultured with IL-13Rα2-expressing GBM cells in vitro. IL-13-zetakine CAR-T cells have also demonstrated effective targeting or IL-13Rα2 tumor cells in a murine model of human glioma, with regression of tumors and no neurotoxicity in the study [42].

A pilot study of IL-13 zetakine CAR-T cells in patients with recurrent GBMs demonstrated a reduction in IL-13Ra2 expression, with some indications of increased tumor necrosis [43]. Recently, second-generation CAR targeting IL-13Rα2 (IL-13Rα2-CAR)-transduced T cells were shown higher anti-tumor effect than IL-13- zetakine [44].

However, while issues of off-target effects and toxicity have been minimal in murine models and small clinical trials, questions and concerns remain. One group found that the recognized antigen for a commercially available IL-13Rα2 mAb recognized VCAM-1 not IL-13Rα2, and that the antibody used in many analyses, B-D13, is di-clonal, recognizing both IL-13Rα2 and VCAM-1 [45]. Although the successful results of the IL-13Rα2 CAR-T cell studies remain valid, questions about the immunologic mechanisms and pathways underlying the results may require further investigation.

EphA2 (Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma A2)

EphA2 is a member of the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases, and binds to the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored ephrin-A ligand. Nearly 90% of GBMs overexpress ephrin, and EphA2 is commonly overexpressed in a variety of malignancies [46,47]. EphA2 exhibits ligand-dependent inhibition and ligand-independent promotion of cell migration and invasion; Akt kinase phosphorylation of EphA2 promotes ligand-independent cell migration, while ERK-RSK signal pathways also regulate this phosphorylation, altering migration and invasion dynamics of tumor cells [48,49], suggesting EphA2 as a target for CAR-T cell therapy.

EphA2 specific CAR-T cells have been developed, and shown to be effective in targeting tumor cells, reducing tumor burden, and minimizing the development of antigen loss in GBM cells [50]. Additionally, this group demonstrated targeting of neurospheres, an in vitro surrogate for putative glioma-initiating cells, indicating that EphA2 CAR-T cells may be effective both against the main tumor burden and microinfiltrating cell nests that evade traditional chemotherapy and radiation, and are proposed as the source for recurrence and spread of GBM. A phase I/II clinical trial of EphA2- CAR-T cell therapy for EphA2-positive MGs was initiated in China in 2015 (NCT02575261).

Future Directions

Although limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapies in conjunction with standard of care chemotherapy and radiation [18], this remains an incompletely explored area. The synergistic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T cells is a promising method for augmenting ACT, making a more efficient and effective oncologic treatment modality [51]. The first trial of this method is ongoing and will evaluate the efficacy of ipilimumab combined with CD19-CAR-T cells against B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphocytic leukemia, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (NCT00586391). CAR-T cells engineered to secrete anti- PD-1 antibodies have recently been developed, and were shown to induce regression of renal cell carcinoma in vivo [52]. These innovations provide renewed potential for CAR-T cell immunotherapy to successfully treat solid cancers.

Given the propensity of GBM cells to develop treatment resistance through a variety of mutations, the use of multiple CAR-T cell targets simultaneously may be an attractive proposition to ensure efficacy, particularly in patients with recurrent GBMs. Bispecific CAR-T cells targeting HER2 and IL-13Rα2 have enhanced functionality against GBM cells, and provide increased tumor control in vivo [53]. While some research exists on CAR-T cells co-expressing receptors for multiple GBM markers, additional work is needed to determine the most efficacious combination of markers (23939024, 27427982).

Additionally, CAR-T cells have been engineered with dual-antigen expression designed to increase specificity [54] and to provide dynamic self-regulation as a safety mechanism [55], however these cells have proved challenging to produce, which may limit large-scale clinical applications.

Another novel variant, synthetic Notch (synNotch) AND-gated CAR has recently been reported [56]. In this system, the synNotch receptor recognizes a tumor-specific antigen, and drives expression of a CAR for a second tumor-specific antigen. This dual-specificity helps minimize toxicity to non-tumor tissue. The synNotch mechanism is independent of CAR/TCR signaling, and rather than triggering T-cell activation, serves to prime the expression of CAR. The AND-gated T cells demonstrated robust therapeutic discrimination in vivo , and overcame the problem off-tumor/on-target cross reaction in normal tissue.

It is important to find new tumor-specific antigens to expand the repertoire of CAR-T cell therapies while minimizing toxicity. Tumor-specific carbohydrates and glycolipids are potential novel candidate targets, because CARs (unlike classical TCRs) can recognize structures other than protein epitopes [57]. New approaches to antigen discovery have also focused on the recognition of somatic mutations present in tumor antigens, as mutant peptides may serve as T cell epitopes [58]. Tumor epitopes identified by using whole-exome sequencing analysis with mass spectrometry have revealed immunogenic mutant peptides [59].

Finally, another possible strategy is to create universal donor CAR-T cells. Human T cells in which HLA class I has been genetically deleted in order to evade the immune response provides a source of cells from a single donor can be administered to multiple recipients [60].


  1. Galluzzi L, Vacchelli E, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Buque A, Senovilla L, et al. (2014) Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies. Oncotarget 5: 12472-12508.
  2. Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, et al. (2014) Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med 371: 1507-1517.
  3. Kershaw MH, Westwood JA, Parker LL, Wang G, Eshhar Z, et al. (2006) A phase I study on adoptive immunotherapy using gene-modified T cells for ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 6106-6115.
  4. Lamers CH, Sleijfer S, Vulto AG, Kruit WH, Kliffen M, et al. (2006) Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with autologous T-lymphocytes genetically retargeted against carbonic anhydrase IX: first clinical experience. J Clin Oncol 24: e20-22.
  5. Pule MA, Savoldo B, Myers GD, Rossig C, Russell HV, et al. (2008) Virus-specific T cells engineered to coexpress tumor-specific receptors: persistence and antitumor activity in individuals with neuroblastoma. Nat Med 14: 1264-1270.
  6. Ahmed N, Ratnayake M, Savoldo B, Perlaky L, Dotti G, et al. (2007) Regression of experimental medulloblastoma following transfer of HER2-specific T cells. Cancer Res 67: 5957-5964
  7. Catalan E, Charni S, Jaime P, Aguilo JI, Enriquez JA, et al. (2015) MHC-I modulation due to changes in tumor cell metabolism regulates tumor sensitivity to CTL and NK cells. Oncoimmunology 4: e985924.
  8. Platten M, Wick W, Weller M (2001) Malignant glioma biology: role for TGF-beta in growth, motility, angiogenesis, and immune escape. Microsc Res Tech 52: 401-410.
  9. Zagzag D, Salnikow K, Chiriboga L, Yee H, Lan L, et al. (2005) Downregulation of major histocompatibility complex antigens in invading glioma cells: stealth invasion of the brain. Lab Invest 85: 328-341.
  10. Wang L, Ma N, Okamoto S, Amaishi Y, Sato E, et al. (2016) Efficient tumor regression by adoptively transferred CEA-specific CAR-T cells associated with symptoms of mild cytokine release syndrome. Oncoimmunology 5: e1211218.
  11. Hu Y, Sun J, Wu Z, Yu J, Cui Q, et al. (2016) Predominant cerebral cytokine release syndrome in CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell therapy. J Hematol Oncol 9: 70.
  12. Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN (2016) Toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells: recognition and management. Blood 127: 3321-3330.
  13. Xu XJ, Tang YM (2014) Cytokine release syndrome in cancer immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cells. Cancer Lett 343: 172-178.
  14. Teachey DT, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, Melenhorst JJ, Maude SL, et al. (2016) Identification of Predictive Biomarkers for Cytokine Release Syndrome after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Discov 6: 664-679.
  15. June CH, Maus MV, Plesa G, Johnson LA, Zhao Y, et al. (2014) Engineered T cells for cancer therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 63: 969-975.
  16. Porter DL, Hwang WT, Frey NV, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, et al. (2015) Chimeric antigen receptor T cells persist and induce sustained remissions in relapsed refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Sci Transl Med 7: 303ra139.
  17. Miao H, Choi BD, Suryadevara CM, Sanchez-Perez L, Yang S, et al. (2014) EGFRvIII-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells migrate to and kill tumor deposits infiltrating the brain parenchyma in an invasive xenograft model of glioblastoma. PLoS One 9: e94281.
  18. Riccione K, Suryadevara CM, Snyder D, Cui X, Sampson JH, et al. (2015) Generation of CAR T cells for adoptive therapy in the context of glioblastoma standard of care. J Vis Exp 96.
  19. Sampson JH, Choi BD, Sanchez-Perez L, Suryadevara CM, Snyder DJ, et al. (2014) EGFRvIII mCAR-modified T-cell therapy cures mice with established intracerebral glioma and generates host immunity against tumor-antigen loss. Clin Cancer Res 20: 972-984.
  20. Choi BD, Suryadevara CM, Gedeon PC, Herndon JE, Sanchez-Perez L, et al. (2014) Intracerebral delivery of a third generation EGFRvIII-specific chimeric antigen receptor is efficacious against human glioma. J Clin Neurosci 21: 189-190.
  21. Morgan RA, Johnson LA, Davis JL, Zheng Z, Woolard KD, et al. (2012) Recognition of glioma stem cells by genetically modified T cells targeting EGFRvIII and development of adoptive cell therapy for glioma. Hum Gene Ther 23: 1043-1053.
  22. Ohno M, Natsume A, Ichiro Iwami K, Iwamizu H, et al. (2010) Retrovirally engineered T-cell-based immunotherapy targeting type III variant epidermal growth factor receptor, a glioma-associated antigen. Cancer Sci 101: 2518-2524.
  23. Suryadevara CM, Verla T, Sanchez-Perez L, Reap EA, Choi BD, et al. (2015) Immunotherapy for malignant glioma. Surg Neurol Int 6: S68-77.
  24. Ge H, Gong X, Tang CK (2002) Evidence of high incidence of EGFRvIII expression and coexpression with EGFR in human invasive breast cancer by laser capture microdissection and immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Cancer 98: 357-361.
  25. Sok JC, Coppelli FM, Thomas SM, Lango MN, Xi S, Hunt JL, et al. (2006) Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) contributes to head and neck cancer growth and resistance to EGFR targeting. Clin Cancer Res 12: 5064-5073.
  26. Okamoto S, Yoshikawa K, Obata Y, Shibuya M, Aoki S, et al. (1996) Monoclonal antibody against the fusion junction of a deletion-mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. British journal of cancer 73: 1366-1372.
  27. Nakayashiki N, Yoshikawa K, Nakamura K, Hanai N, Okamoto K, et al. (2000) Production of a single-chain variable fragment antibody recognizing type III mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Jpn J Cancer Res 91: 1035-1043.
  28. Johnson LA, Scholler J, Ohkuri T, Kosaka A, Patel PR, et al. (2015) Rational development and characterization of humanized anti-EGFR variant III chimeric antigen receptor T cells for glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med 7: 275ra22.
  29. Han J, Chu J, Keung Chan W, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. (2015) CAR-Engineered NK Cells Targeting Wild-Type EGFR and EGFRvIII Enhance Killing of Glioblastoma and Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Sci Rep 5: 11483.
  30. Sampson JH, Heimberger AB, Archer GE, Aldape KD, Friedman AH, et al. (2010) Immunologic escape after prolonged progression-free survival with epidermal growth factor receptor variant III peptide vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28: 4722-4729.
  31. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455: 1061-1068.
  32. Potti A, Forseen SE, Koka VK, Pervez H, Koch M, et al. (2004) Determination of HER-2/neu overexpression and clinical predictors of survival in a cohort of 347 patients with primary malignant brain tumors. Cancer Invest 22: 537-544.
  33. Moasser MM (2007) The oncogene HER2: its signaling and transforming functions and its role in human cancer pathogenesis. Oncogene 26: 6469-6487.
  34. Mineo JF, Bordron A, Baroncini M, Maurage CA, Ramirez C, et al. (2007) Low HER2-expressing glioblastomas are more often secondary to anaplastic transformation of low-grade glioma. J Neurooncol 85: 281-287.
  35. Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, Dudley ME, Laurencot CM, et al. (2010) Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther 18: 843-851.
  36. Wykosky J, Gibo DM, Stanton C, Debinski W (2008) Interleukin-13 receptor alpha 2, EphA2, and Fos-related antigen 1 as molecular denominators of high-grade astrocytomas and specific targets for combinatorial therapy. Clin Cancer Res 14: 199-208.
  37. Tu M, Wange W, Cai L, Zhu P, Gao Z, et al. (2016) IL-13 receptor alpha2 stimulates human glioma cell growth and metastasis through the Src/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Tumour Biol 37: 14701-14709.
  38. Brown CE, Warden CD, Starr R, Deng X, Badie B, et al. (2013) Glioma IL13Ralpha2 is associated with mesenchymal signature gene expression and poor patient prognosis. PLoS One 8: e77769
  39. Shimato S, Natsume A, Wakabayashi T, Tsujimura K, Nakahara N, et al. (2008) Identification of a human leukocyte antigen-A24-restricted T-cell epitope derived from interleukin-13 receptor alpha2 chain, a glioma-associated antigen. J Neurosurg 109: 117-122.
  40. Iwami K, Shimato S, Ohno M, Okada H, Nakahara N, et al. (2012) Peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination targeting interleukin-13 receptor alpha2 chain in recurrent malignant glioma patients with HLA-A*24/A*02 allele. Cytotherapy 14: 733-742.
  41. Krenciute G, Krebs S, Torres D, Wu MF, Liu H, et al. (2016) Characterization and Functional Analysis of scFv-based Chimeric Antigen Receptors to Redirect T Cells to IL13Ralpha2-positive Glioma. Mol Ther 24: 354-363.
  42. Kahlon KS, Brown C, Cooper LJ, Raubitschek A, Forman S, et al. (2004) Specific recognition and killing of glioblastoma multiforme by interleukin 13-zetakine redirected cytolytic T cells. Cancer Res 64: 9160-9166.
  43. Brown CE, Badie B, Barish ME, Weng L, Ostberg JR, et al. (2015) Bioactivity and Safety of IL13Ralpha2-Redirected Chimeric Antigen Receptor CD8+ T Cells in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 21: 4062-4072.
  44. Kong S, Sengupta S, Tyler B, Bais AJ, Ma Q, et al. (2012) Suppression of human glioma xenografts with second-generation IL13R-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Clin Cancer Res 18: 5949-5960.
  45. Mahadev V, Starr R, Wright SL, Martinez C, Jensen MC, et al. (2014) Cytokine induction of VCAM-1 but not IL13Ralpha2 on glioma cells: a tale of two antibodies. PLoS One 9: e95123.
  46. Pasquale EB (2010) Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer: bidirectional signalling and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 165-180.
  47. Wang LF, Fokas E, Bieker M, Rose F, Rexin P, et al. (2008) Increased expression of EphA2 correlates with adverse outcome in primary and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme patients. Oncol Rep 19: 151-156.
  48. Miao H, Gale NW, Guo H, Qian J, Petty A, et al. (2015) EphA2 promotes infiltrative invasion of glioma stem cells in vivo through cross-talk with Akt and regulates stem cell properties. Oncogene 34: 558-567.
  49. Zhou Y, Yamada N, Tanaka T, Hori T, Yokoyama S, et al. (2015) Crucial roles of RSK in cell motility by catalysing serine phosphorylation of EphA2. Nat Commun 6: 7679.
  50. Chow KK, Naik S, Kakarla S, Brawley VS, Shaffer DR, et al. (2013) T cells redirected to EphA2 for the immunotherapy of glioblastoma. Mol Ther 21: 629-637.
  51. John LB, Devaud C, Duong CP, Yong CS, Beavis PA, et al. (2013) Anti-PD-1 antibody therapy potently enhances the eradication of established tumors by gene-modified T cells. Clin Cancer Res 19: 5636-5646.
  52. Suarez ER, Chang DK, Sun J, Sui J, Freeman GJ, et al. (2016) Chimeric antigen receptor T cells secreting anti-PD-L1 antibodies more effectively regress renal cell carcinoma in a humanized mouse model. Oncotarget 7: 34341-34355.
  53. Hegde M, Corder A, Chow KK, Mukherjee M, Ashoori A, et al. (2013) Combinational targeting offsets antigen escape and enhances effector functions of adoptively transferred T cells in glioblastoma. Mol Ther 21: 2087-2101.
  54. Grada Z, Hegde M, Byrd T, Shaffer DR, Ghazi A, et al. (2013) TanCAR: A Novel Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor for Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2: e105.
  55. Fedorov VD, Themeli M, Sadelain M (2013) PD-1- and CTLA-4-based inhibitory chimeric antigen receptors (iCARs) divert off-target immunotherapy responses. Sci Transl Med 5: 215ra172.
  56. Roybal KT, Rupp LJ, Morsut L, Walker WJ, McNally KA, et al. (2016) Precision Tumor Recognition by T Cells With Combinatorial Antigen-Sensing Circuits. Cell 164: 770-779.
  57. Shiina S, Ohno M, Ohka F, Kuramitsu S, Yamamichi A, et al. (2016) CAR T Cells Targeting Podoplanin Reduce Orthotopic Glioblastomas in Mouse Brains. Cancer immunology research.4: 259-268.
  58. Brown SD, Warren RL, Gibb EA, Martin SD, Spinelli JJ, et al. (2014) Neo-antigens predicted by tumor genome meta-analysis correlate with increased patient survival. Genome Res 24: 743-750.
  59. Yadav M, Jhunjhunwala S, Phung QT, Lupardus P, Tanguay J, et al. (2014) Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing. Nature 515: 572-576.
  60. Torikai H, Reik A, Soldner F, Warren EH, Yuen C, et al. (2013) Toward eliminating HLA class I expression to generate universal cells from allogeneic donors. Blood 122: 1341-1349.
Citation: Natsume A, Pendleton C (2018) Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapeutic Strategies: The Future of Glioblastoma Management. Immunome Res 14: 148.

Copyright: © 2018 Natsume A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.