GET THE APP

Anthropometric Measurement of Weight for Assessment of Nutritiona
Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research

Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0940

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2017) Volume 7, Issue 3

Anthropometric Measurement of Weight for Assessment of Nutritional Status of Anganwadi Children in Urban Mangalore - A Cross Sectional Study

Srinivasa SB1, Dnyaneshwar B1* and Ajay U2
1Department of Anatomy, Koppal Institute of Medical Sciences, Gangavathi road, Koppal, India
2Department of Anatomy, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, India
*Corresponding Author: Dnyaneshwar B, Department of Anatomy, Koppal Institute of Medical Sciences, Gangavathi Road, Koppal, India, Tel: +918147726955 Email:

Abstract

Background and objectives: Anthropometry is the part of anatomy used to do external measurement of human body to assess underlying disease, like assessing the nutritional status of a child.

Methods: The 254 Anganwadi children between age group 1 to 6 years of urban Mangalore during 2013 year, measurements are calculated using WHO growth standard in assessing weight.

Interpretation and conclusion: The underweight denotes in respect to age but doesn’t pin point whether acute or chronic, but the stunting is due to chronic malnutrition, the axial skeletal growth is stunted. Concludes that lower socioeconomic status and malnutrition are interrelated, which hampers the normal physical, intellectual, psychological development of children, there by affects the progress of the country.

Keywords: Anthropometry, Anganwadi children, Growth, Socioeconomic status, Urban mangalore

Introduction

Malnutrition [1,2] continues to be the biggest health problem of our country today despite efforts by the government of India and voluntary health agencies towards eradication of the same. There is a growing realization that adequate nutrition is a necessary first step in the improvement of quality of life. Malnutrition and infection are connected by a vicious cycle. It is one of the greatest international health problem and the biggest challenges. World health organization is facing today, its association with infection family size, parental education, nutritional taboos, economic status of the family has been repeatedly proved.

The nutritional problem [3] cannot be estimated just by assessing prevalence of easily recognized syndromes like Marasmus or Kwashiorkor. These are tips of the Iceberg; biggest part of it is hidden. Most effective and simplest way of detecting hidden malnutrition is by anthropometric assessment.

The growth rate is maximal during first six years of life; hence malnutrition has a direct impact on infant mortality rate under 5 mortality rates, which are prime indicators of health status of a country [4]. Poverty, feeding habits, sex discrimination, large family and economic income of the family are contributing factors for malnutrition [1]. The proverb “sound mind in a sound body” stress direct correlation of malnutrition and intelligence, since children are future citizens of any country, a well-nourished intelligent child are asset for the country.

Maternal health and child health are directly linked [5]. Wellnourished well fed mothers will give to a well-nourished baby. So the problem of malnutrition starts right from the day of conceivement. “It starts in the womb ends in the tomb”. Hence any program aimed at eradication of malnutrition has to include both these segments of population. Government of India, realizing this fact has initiated various programs covering mother and child viz., integrated child development scheme, child survival and safe motherhood nutritional supplementation programs [6]. Baldwin [7] prepared standard height and age charts in metric units for America children. They first used their term Nutritional anthropometry which is now employed for all such children. Gadra [8] reported anthropometric data on 1,814 children between 6-36 months of age in CARE project in Madhya Pradesh and reported average measurement .The weight being 80% of ICMR and 70% of Harvard scale. The length was 81% of Harvard standard, Head circumference was 100%. The chest circumference was 90% of ICMR standard and mid arm circumference was 98%.

Prahlad Rao [9] surveyed the nutritional status of 1,093 rural children in Hyderabad. The mean height and weight of these children from low socio economic group was 5th percentile of data obtained from belonging to higher socio-economic group. Srivastava [10] did a random cross sectional study of 1,000 pre-school children from Jabalpur. They observed that average weight of boys exceeded that of girls; at all ages except between 31-33 months. Boys appeared to be more average of 3-6 months advance of girls. The rates of growth between boys and girls did not differ materially, thought boys tend to grow faster than girls around 9th year of life. OP Ghai [11] surveyed 3,029 preschool children in Haryana state 39.3% of children in 2nd year of life weighed less than 80 percent reference weight for age standard. They observed that 17.8% pre-school children weighed less than 80% of reference standards (ICMR1968). Prevalence of malnutrition based on low body weight was highest in the age group 12-17months, but was also significant between ages of 18-29 months.

Materials and Methods

As per World health organization [12,13] weight loss can be both stunting and acute underweight is a composite index, which is difficult to interpret. So following indicators represent international status and health in population.

Under weight: <−2SD WAZ (z-score for weight for age)

Stunting: <−2SD HAZ (z-score for height for age)

Thinning (wasting): <−2SD WHZ (z-score for weight for height)

Over weight: >+2SD WHZ (z-score for weight for height)

Cut off values for public health by WHO (Table 1):

Severity of malnutrition Low(%) prevalence Medium(%) prevalence High (%) prevalence Very High prevalence (%)
Underweight <10 Sep-17 20-29 =/>30
Stunting <20 20-29 30-39 =/>40
Thinning/wasting <5 (acceptable) 5-9 (poor) 10-14 (serious) =/>15 ( critical)

Table 1: Cut off values for public health by WHO.

A total of 254 children between the ages of 1-6 years, belonging to 21 Anganwadis of urban ICDS project were studied (Table 2). The study was conducted by visiting individual Anganwadis between 9 AM to 1 PM, the working hours of Anganwadis.

Indicators of malnutrition
Indicators Interpretation Reason
Stunting Low height for age Indicator of chronic malnutrition, the result of prolonged food deprivation and or disease or illness. Slowing in skeletal growth
Wasting Low weight for height Suggests acute malnutrition, the result of more recent food deficit or illness. Deficit in tissue and fat mass
Underweight Low weight for age Combined indicator to reflect both acute and chronic malnutrition  

Table 2: Indicators of malnutrition.

The Anganwadis are selected at Random covering all geographic areas of Mangalore.

General Information

General information consisted of name of the Anganwadi, name, age and sex of child, address, mother’s name, literacy status, occupation, father’s name, literacy status, occupation, income of the family. Age of the child was taken to the nearest month.

Each angnawadi consist of one Anganwadi worker, who is familiar with the child’s family and one assistant to help her in preparation and distribution of food.

Anthropometric measurement [12] included weight, taken carefully in front of anganwadi workers, after obtaining written permission. There are 111 urban Anganwadis in and around Mangalore. Each Anganwadi consisted of 30-50 children on an average. Measurement were taken personally to avoid inter observer variation. Children showing the following sign and symptoms were excluded from the study.

• Those who are were bedridden for more than 15 days, during the past 6 months preceding the date of examination

• Children diagnosed to be having chronic illness like tuberculosis, recurrent malarial attacks.

• Those with past history of low birth weight and physical deformities.

Care was taken to obtain accurate measurement by using standard equipment all recording were taken by a single and by the use of same equipments. All measurement were taken as per the specification of ICMR which lay down for its cross sectional survey of growth and development of Indian children. All measurement was taken in SI Units.

Weight

Each child was weighed without footwear and minimal clothing. Hence no deduction was made for this. All children asked to empty their bladder before Weighing. Digital electronic weighing machine was used, hence, accuracy of the scale was checked by standard weight before visiting Anganwadi, Care was taken to see that child does not lean forward or holds any other support nearby, which may alter the reading weight as recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg. There are 111 urban Anganwadis in and around Mangalore. To be statistically significant at least 20% of these i.e. 21 or more have to be visited. Study period started from August 2012 up to 2013, over a span of 1½ years. Totally 21 Anganwadis were visited during this period. All data’s are from the records maintained by ICDS officials in each Anganwadi (Figure 1).

anatomy-physiology-Weight-measurement

Figure 1: Weight measurement technique.

Kuppuswamy`s classification (Modified) for Socio-economic status of urban population (Tables 3 and 4) [13].

  Items Score
A Education of the headof Household  
1. Profession or honours 7
2. Graduates or post graduates 6
3. Intermediate/post high school diploma 5
4. High school Certificate 4
5. Middle school Certificate 3
6. Primary School Certificate 2
7. Illiterate 1
B Occupation  
1. Profession 10
2.  Semi profession 6
3. Clerical, Shop owner, Former 5
4. Skilled worker 4
5. Semi- Skilled worker 3
6. Unskilled worker 2
7. Unemployment 1
C Family income per month(in Rs) modified for 2007  
1. 19,575 12
2. 9,788-19,575 10
3. 7323-9,787 6
4. 4,894-7,322 4
5. 2,936-4,893 3
6. 980-2,935 2
7. <979 1

Table 3: Kuppuswamy`s classification for socio-economic status of urban population.

According to total score Socioeconomic class
26-29 Upper(I)
16-25 Upper middle(II)
11-15 (middle) Lower middle(III)
5-10 (lower) Upper Lower(IV)
<5 Lower(V)

Table 4: Different weightages are given for each scale.

There are three variables

• Education

• Occupation

• Income

Results

Mean and standard deviation for weight of children (Table 5).

Age in months Total   Male   Female  
Mean (kg) SD Mean (kg) SD Mean (kg) SD
12-18 NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
19-24 11.6 0.84 12.2 - 11 -
25-30 11.6 1.21 11.89 1.17 11.19 1.22
31-36 12.18 1.7 12.52 1.5 11.89 1.83
37-42 12.75 1.43 13 1.45 12.43 1.38
43-48 13.61 2.07 14.21 2.15 12.96 1.82
49-54 14.35 1.97 14.45 2.27 14.23 1.66
55-60 14.8 2.42 15.21 2.34 14.24 2.5
61-66 14.53 1.18 13.82 1.65 14.85 0.8
67-72 14.88 2.35  -  - 14.88 2.35

Table 5: Mean and standard deviation for weight of children.

Discussion and Conclusion

While Weight for age (WAZ) is loss of weight or Underweight due to under nutrition, it can be acute or chronic cause is 69 (27.16%) is High prevalence according to cut-off value of public significant by WHO, 31 (24.03%) boys and 38 (30.4%) girls are under weight. Gender wise girls are more affected (Table 6).

Severity of malnutrition Prevalence (%)
Underweight(WAZ) 27.16%
Thinning/wasting(WHZ) 10.60%
Stunting (HAZ) 30.70%

Table 6: Novel findings are as below as per Z-score.

In weight for height (WHZ) is wasting or thinness helpful when age doesn`t known; is due to acute under nutrition e.g. Infection or loose motion. Total thinness 27 (10.6%) is Serious according to cut-off value of public significant by WHO, out of that, 13 (10.07%) are boys and 14 (11.2%) are girls. Gender wise girls are more affected (Tables 7 and 8).

According to total score Socioeconomic class
5-10 (lower) Upper Lower(IV)

Table 7: Kuppuswamy`s classification (modified) for socio–economic status of urban population.

Population No: Age group WAZ HAZ WHZ Study area
India - Under 5years 43% 48% 20% India by surveillance
World - Under 5years 16% 27% 10% World by surveillance
Anganwadi 235 Under 5years 67% 49.36% 28.52% Pune
Saharia tribal children 238 1-5 years 72% 68% 13% Rajasthan India
Gonda Tribal children 1022 1-5 years 61.70% 51.70% 32.80% MP, India
Kodaku children 182 1-5 years 59.80% 43% 35% Chhatisgarh, India
Raj Gond 123 1-5 years 37.40% 46.30% 41.50% MP India
ICDS children 673 1-5 years 39.40% - - Chapra, WB, India
Dhodia children 306 0-5 years - 15.30% 11.30% Coastal, India

Table 8: Studies to know the impact of ICDS.

Comparison with previous studies

The present study is compared with similar studies to know the impact of ICDS, project in Mangalore, India and International. The decrease weight for age (Underweight) is of 27.16%, the values are less than average value of India which is of 43%. The Weight for height (Thinning) is 10.6%, it is closer to values of UNICEF 2012 (10%), Punjab (10.8%) and Bangladesh (10%). Less than average prevalence in India (20%). Regarding overweight is 1.96% less research has been done as underweight is more common. But it is the best indicator for many non-communicable diseases, includes Diabetes mellitus, Coronary heart disease and increased risk for musculo skeletal disorders and respiratory symptoms.

Underweight 69 (27.16%) children as per this study] indicates acute or chronic malnourishment. Stunting 78 (30.7%) children as per this study] indicates chronic malnutrition causing reduced skeletal growth. Thinning/wasting (10.6%) children in this study] indicates muscle wasting due to acute with chronic cause(less food intake) [27]. Both underweight and stunting come under high prevalence and wasting comes under Serious as per WHO standard for public health significance.

Weech’s formula [14-19] was used to calculate the expected weight and height (wasting is not possible) of the children given their age in years. It is helpful where the WHO growth chart is not available and mother doesn’t know exact age of the child.

Weight for age: 2x+8= Reference weight

Height for age: 6x+77=Reference height

(Generally “x” is age in completed year) [20].

As per normal growth spurt; the child weight gain 2kg and height gain 6 cm in every year [21-23]. After the completed 1 year average weight taken as 8 kg and height as 77 cms.

The study concludes with the hope that a healthy mother can give a healthy baby with improved socio-economic status and equal care for both boys and girls at home. The anthropometry is a set of methods in assessing the nutritional status of a growing child both physically and mentally between the 1 to 6 years age group which decide the future intellectuality and personality of the citizen in a country (Graph 1).

anatomy-physiology-Line-diagram

Graph 1: Line diagram representing the mean weight of children.

The weight was calculated using the arithmetic formulas against age and correlated using standard deviation (Z-score) and with socioeconomic status of the family using Kuppuswamy modified socioeconomic status method was stage IV. The 30.7% are stunted, 23% impaired head circumference; these two indicate chronic malnutrition. The 10.6% are thinning indicates acute malnourishment due to low food intake (infection-excluded criteria). All these parameters are predominantly affected in girls than boys (Table 8). The Weech’s formula is more sensitive and specific, compared to z-score, but can’t be compared with international standard (Graph 2).

anatomy-physiology-mean-weight

Graph 2: Line diagram representing mean weight among males and female children.

The present study shows higher percentage of lower socioeconomic population in comparison with anthropometric data, suggestive of the poor status of family affecting the 3 to 6 years age group of children causing chronic associated with acute malnourishment.

References

  1. Falkner F, Gopalan C, Kamala JR (1980) In: Prevention in childhood of health problem in left. WHO 1: 9-18.
  2. WHOExpert Committee(1995) Physcal status; The use and interpretation of Anthropometry. WHO Technical report. 854: 55.
  3. Physcal status; The use and interpretation of Anthropometry. WHO Technical report. 854: 55.
  4. Park K (2013) Park`s text book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 47: 546-613.
  5. Baldwin H (1925) Weight, Heiht, Age standards in Metri Units for American born children. Am J Phys Anthropol 8: 12-19.
  6. Nutrion (1983) Central Technical Committee on Health and. Integrated child development services. All Idia Institute of Medical Sciences.
  7. Gadra G (1973) Anthropometric profile of tribal and non-tribal pre-school children of Madhya pradesh Indian. paediatrics 10: 126.
  8. PrahladR (1969) Nutritional status of pre-school children or rural community near Hydrabad city. IJMR57.
  9. SrivastivaF (1970) Nutritional assesment of preschool children in and around Jabalpur. Indian Paediatrics 7.
  10. Ghai OP (1970) Nutritional assesment of pre-school children of a rural community. WHO 58: 600.
  11. Ghai OP (2009) Ghai essential pediatrics. New Delhi: CBS Publisher & Distributors Pvt ltd 2: 19-26.
  12. Kuppu SW (2012) Socioeconomic scale: updating Income Ranges for the Year 2012. Indian Journal of Public Health 56.
  13. WHO Working Group (1986) Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. Bulletin of the World health organization 64: 929-941.
  14. Parthasarathi A (2009) Protein energy malnutrition. Jaypee Brothers 123.
  15. Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. Bulletin of the World health organization 64: 929-941.
  16. Subha D (2012) Nutritional profile of preschool children: A review. Anthropology 14:467-472.
  17. UNICEF (2012) The State of World`s children 2012: Children in the urban world. UNICEF 20: 212.
  18. Rao MK, Kumar RH, Venkaiah K (2006) Nutritional status of Saharia - A primitive tribe of Rajasthan. Saharia : J Hum Ecol 19: 117-123.
  19. Rao VG, Yadav R, Dolla CK, Kumar (2005) GondaUndernutrition and childhood morbidities in tribal preschool children. Indian J med res 122: 43-47.
  20. Biswas S, Bose K, ChapraS (2009) Prevalence of thinness among Rural Bengalee preschool children in Chapra, Naida District, West Bengal, India. Mal J Nutr 15: 155-164.
  21. Dolla CK, Meshram P, Shrivastava P (2005) Nutritional status of kodaku preschool children in central India. J Hum Ecol 17: 229-231.
Citation: Srinivasa SB, Dnyaneshwar B, Ajay U (2017) Anthropometric Measurement of Weight for Assessment of Nutritional Status of Anganwadi Children in Urban Mangalore - A Cross Sectional Study. Anat Physiol 7:259.

Copyright: © 2017 Srinivasa SB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top