GET THE APP

An Economic Analysis of Fish Production of SHG's and Fishermen cooperative groups in Mungeli District of Chhattisgarh
Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal

Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal
Open Access

ISSN: 2150-3508

+44 20 3868 9735

Research Article - (2022)Volume 13, Issue 5

An Economic Analysis of Fish Production of SHG's and Fishermen cooperative groups in Mungeli District of Chhattisgarh

Rohit Kumar Sahu*, Ajay Tegar and Mukesh Kumar Anant
 
*Correspondence: Rohit Kumar Sahu, Department of Agricultural Economics, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Chhattisgarh, India, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Fisheries sector has an important role in Indian economy, as it provide more than 2.8 cores job directly or indirectly to the primary level fishers and fish farmers. Globally the aquaculture production raised by triple in weight which was 34 MT to 112 MT from 1997 to 2017. In India this sector contributing 7.8% of agriculture’s GDP. In Chhattisgarh about 2.20 lakh of persons are employed in fisheries sector and most of them are belongs to the under privileged section of society. Fish production in Chhattisgarh has increased by the average of 315% from the base year 2007-08 to current year 2020-21. The study was conducted in the Mungeli district of Chhattisgarh. Mungeli and Pathariya blocks were selected for the study. Based on the performance, 4 SHG’s and 4 Fishermen cooperative groups were identified and total of 40 and 112 respondents were interviewed by pre-tested questionnaire respectively. It was found that the total cost incurred by SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups per hectare was Rs. 47658.73 and Rs. 60354.00 respectively. The average production of fish was found to be 18.15 and 27.90 quintals with a net return of Rs. 151991.27 and Rs. 260496.00 per hectare, having a B:C ratio of 1:3.18 and 1:4.31 in SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups respectively.

Keywords

Fishermen cooperative groups; Fish; Total cost; Net return; B:C ratio

Introduction

Fisheries sector plays as an important role in the Indian economy. Exports, food and nutritional security, national income, and job creation are all boosted by it. More than 2.8 cores primary-level fishers and fish farmers depend on the fisheries sector for their livelihood, and many more people further down the fisheries value chain. For a sizable portion of the economically underprivileged population of the country, particularly in the coastal districts, this sector also serves as a significant source of income [1,2].

Between 1997 and 2017, the live-weight volume of the world's aquaculture production more than tripled, from 34 MT to 112 MT. In 2017, the top seventy-five percent of aquaculture production was primarily made up of seaweed, carps, tilapia, and catfish species groups. Today, there are 40% more fish, shellfish, aquatic plant, and algal species being cultivated worldwide in a variety of marine, brackish, and freshwater systems; it has increases the diversity of aquaculture [3].

India, a maritime nation, has extensive water resources located in both the inland and marine sectors that are used for fisheries capture and culture. Aquaculture has experienced an average annual growth rate of more than 10%, contributing to the sector's overall strong growth of about 8%. The sector's overall gross value added has been increasing steadily, making up about 7.8% of agriculture's GDP. During 2019–20, the export of maritime goods totaled 12.9 lakh metric tons and was worth Rs 46662.85 cores. Fish and fish products make up about 17 percent of the agriculture exports of our nation [2].

By fostering self-employment among rural women fishermen through SHGs, the Chhattisgarh State is also playing a significant role in improving the lives of these people. The state has abundant water resources, including 1649 irrigation reservoirs and 59175 rural pond areas totaling 0.772 million square meters. These water bodies may be used to develop fisheries through SHGs [4].

The State is actively contributing by fostering rural selfemployment in the fishing industry, which in turn enables rural residents to access wholesome food. Fisheries sector has employed for about 2.20 Lakh persons and majority of them belong to under privileged section of the society. A total of 1.920 lakh ha of water area in the state, including 91,928 rural ponds covering 1.094 lakh ha and 1770 irrigation reservoirs covering 0.826 lakh ha, is available for the development of fisheries up to 2020-21. In 2018-19 the total fish production of Chhattisgarh was 4, 88,618.98 Metric ton and in the year 2019-20 it was 537,889.57 Metric ton, which is 10.08% more than previous year. At present, the production of fish is near about 2, 82,790.29 Metric ton till September 2020-21 [5].

Materials and Methods

Sampling framework

Chhattisgarh comprises 32 districts out of that Mungeli district was selected purposively. Mungeli district consists three blocks out of those two blocks i.e., Mungeli and Pathariya was selected based on the availability of data. In Mungeli district there are 44 SHG’s and 18 Fishermen cooperative groups are registered under fish production practices, where in Mungeli and Pathariya blocks the number of SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups constitutes 33 and 8 respectively, out of which 4 SHG’s and 4 Fishermen cooperative groups were selected based on the performance. From the selected SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups total of 40 and 112 members respectively selected for the study purpose.10 wholesalers and 12 retailers were identified in the study area out of that 5 wholesalers and 6 retailers were selected based on the nature of respond.

Collection of data

Primary data were collected from members of sample SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative group through personal interview using pre-tested interview schedule. The secondary data were collected from the Directorate of Fisheries, Mungeli and also collected from official website of government.

Analytical tools

The data collected from the SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative group are used for estimating cost and returns structure by using fixed and variable cost. The formula used to find cost and returns are as follows:

a. Total cost=Total fixed cost+Total variable cost

b. Gross income (Rs)=Total Yield (kg) x Market Price of the fish (Rs/kg)

c. Net income (Rs)=Gross income–Total cost

d. Benefit-Cost Ratio=Net return/Total Cost

Results and Discussion

Cost and return of fish production

Cost of fish production by SHG’s and fishermen cooperative groups: Economics of cost of fish production carried out separately for SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups is presented in the Table 1. The total cost of fish production were categorized into variable cost and fixed cost per hectare. For SHG’s per hectare cost of fish production was found to be Rs 47658.73 perusal of this table reveals that fish production requires labour in varying magnitude. Though, the labour present in the group is the major part of total human labour requirements, however some hired labour for catching is also required to complete or finish the operations in stipulated time. The average human labour cost for the production was found to be Rs 1949.87 per hectare. The major cost item in fish production were watching cost Rs 18000.00 per hectare, followed by the catching cost Rs 10143.75 per hectare, seed fingerlings Rs 3962.50 per hectare, liming cost Rs 2625.00 per hectare, oilcake cost Rs 1945.00 per hectare, and medicine cost Rs 1712.50 per hectare and Rs 237.50 per hectare for miscellaneous items. The cost incurred on fixed capital is cost on lease rent Rs 2750.00 per hectare. For Fishermen cooperative groups per hectare cost of fish production was found to be Rs 60354.00 perusal of this table reveals that fish production requires labour in varying magnitude. The average human labour cost for fish production was Rs 2005.02 per hectare, the major cost items in fish production were watching cost Rs 20550.00 per hectare, followed by catching Rs 10250.00 per hectare, seed fingerlings cost Rs 6377.50 per hectare, liming cost Rs 4625.00 per hectare, oilcake cost Rs 3362.50 per hectare, medicine cost Rs 2126.25 per hectare, fertilizer cost Rs 1962.50 per hectare and miscellaneous expenses was Rs 482.50 per hectare. Per hectare cost of production of fish by SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups was found Rs 47658.73 and Rs 60354.00 respectively.

S. No. Particular’s SHG's Fishermen cooperative groups
Variables    
a. Labour cost
Group labour 1949.87 (4.09) 2005.02 (3.32)
Hired labour 0.00 (0.00) 0.00 (0.00)
Total 1949.87 (4.09) 2005.02 (3.32)
b. Material cost
Lime 2625.00 (5.50) 4625.00 (7.67)
Seed Fingerlings 3962.50 (8.31) 6377.50 (10.56)
Oil cake 1945.00 (4.08) 3362.50 (5.58)
 Fertilizer 0.00 (0.00) 1962.50 (3.25)
Catching 10143.75 (21.28) 10250.00 (16.99)
Medicine 1712.50 (3.60) 2126.25 (3.53)
Watching 18000.00 (37.77) 20550.00 (34.04)
c. Miscellaneous expenses 237.50 (0.50) 482.50 (0.80)
d. Interest rate on working capital @10% P.A. 4057.61 (8.52) 5174.13 (8.57)
Total 44633.73 (93.65) 56915.4 (94.31)
B Fixed cost
a. Lease rent 2750.00 (5.78) 3126.00 (5.17)
b. Interest rate on fixed capital @10% P.A. 275.00 (0.57) 312.60 (0.52)
Total 3025.00 (6.35) 3437.60 (5.69)
C Total cost (A+B) 47658.73 (100) 60354.00(100)

Table 1: The cost of fish production by SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups.

Gross return, net return and B:C ratio of fish production by SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative group: Gross return, total cost, net return, B:C ratio and cost of production were shown in the Table 2. For SHG’s per hectare total cost of fish production was calculated at Rs 47658.73 per hectare, gross return was Rs 199650.00 per hectare, net return Rs 151991.27 per hectare and B:C ratio was calculated 1:3.18. Similarly for Fishermen cooperative groups, per hectare total cost of fish production was calculated at Rs 60354.00 per hectare, gross return was Rs 320850.00 per hectare, net return was at Rs 260496.00 per hectare and B:C ratio was found 1:4.31. Maximum gross and net return was obtained by Fishermen cooperative groups which indicates that the overall management practices in fish production is better as compared to SHG’s [6-13].

S. No. Particular’s SHG's Fishermen cooperative groups
1 Average production of fish (q/ha) 18.15 27.90
2 Average selling price (Rs/q) 11000.00 11500.00
3 Total cost (Rs/ha) 47658.73 60354.00
4 Gross return (Rs/ha) 199650.00 320850.00
5 Net return (Rs/ha) 151991.3 260496.00
6 Cost of production (Rs/q) 2625.82 2163.22
7 B:C ratio 1:3.18 1:4.31

Table 2: Gross return, net return and B:C ratio of fish production.

Conclusion

A study was conducted in the Mungeli district of Chhattisgarh. Mainly two district Mungeli and Pathariya blocks were selected for the study on the basis of availability of data. It was found that the total cost incurred in the production of fish by SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups was Rs 47658.73 and Rs 60354.00 quintal respectively. Gross return was found to be Rs 199650.00 and Rs 320850.00 per hectare, net return was found to be Rs 151991.27 and Rs 260496.00 per hectare and B:C ratio was found to be 1:3.18 and 1:4.31 in SHG’s and Fishermen cooperative groups respectively. From the B:C ratio it was concluded that the practicing of fish production in the selected blocks was found profitable.

References

Author Info

Rohit Kumar Sahu*, Ajay Tegar and Mukesh Kumar Anant
 
Department of Agricultural Economics, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Chhattisgarh, India
 

Citation: Sahu RK, Tegar A, Anant MK (2022) An Economic Analysis of Fish Production of SHG’s and Fishermen Cooperative Groups in Mungeli District of Chhattisgarh. Fish Aqua J.13: 307.

Received: 31-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. FAJ-22-19133; Editor assigned: 02-Sep-2022, Pre QC No. FAJ-22-19133 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Sep-2022, QC No. FAJ-22-19133; Revised: 23-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. FAJ-22-19133 (R); Published: 30-Sep-2022 , DOI: 10.35248/2150-3508.22.13.307

Copyright: © 2022 Sahu RK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top