GET THE APP

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology Research

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9554

+44 1478 350008

Short Communication - (2019)Volume 10, Issue 5

A Novel Approach That May Explain the Role of Staphylococcus aureus, Polycations, Neutrophils Pro-Inflammatory Agonists and the Bacteriolysis and Auto Immune Phenomena as Possible Major Events in the Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis: A Working Hypothesis

Isaac Ginsburg1* and Erez Koren2
 
*Correspondence: Isaac Ginsburg, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Institute for Dental Research, Ein Kerem Campus, The Hebew University, Jerusalem, Israel, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

The aim of the present short communication is to shed a novel light on the auto immune disorder atopic dermatitis by discussing the possible role played by the plethora of toxic agents released by Staphylococcus aureus which can act in a tight synergism with neutrophils derived cationic polyelectrolytes as related to the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). This disorder results in inflammation of the skin characterized by itchiness, red skin, a rash, by the accumulations of large numbers of Staphylococcus aureus their toxins and proinflammatory agents secreted by migrating neutrophiles are considered the main cause of AD pathogenicity.

Introduction

The aim of the present short communication is to shed a novel light on the auto immune disorder atopic dermatitis by discussing the possible role played by the plethora of toxic agents released by Staphylococcus aureus which can act in a tight synergism with neutrophils derived cationic polyelectrolytes as related to the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) [1,2]. This disorder results in inflammation of the skin characterized by itchiness, red skin, a rash, by the accumulations of large numbers of Staphylococcus aureus their toxins [2] and proinflammatory agents secreted by migrating neutrophiles [3], are considered the main cause of AD pathogenicity.

About the Study

Patients with AD, exhibit defects in innate and acquired immune responses which result in a heightened susceptibility to bacterial, fungal and viral infections but most notably associated with colonization by S. aureus. Several toxins produced by this microorganism [2] may exacerbate disease activity by the induction of specific IgE and the activation of various cell types including Th‐2 cells, eosinophils and keratinocytes.

The idea that a mechanism of autoimmunity could play a role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis is based on the observation that patients with atopic dermatitis display IgE reactivity to a variety of human protein antigens. A broad spectrum of at least 140 IgE-binding self-antigens associated with atopic dermatitis has been demonstrated which might promote, and perpetuate, skin inflammation by binding IgE antibodies or activating specific T cells [4]. Even if the presence of autoreactivity seems to be associated with the severity of the disease, the role of auto autoimmunity in atopic dermatitis is still not clear.

In the present communication, we offer a novel approach that may shed a new light on the mechanisms of AD pathogenicity. We suggest that during inflammation in the skin caused by staphylococci, migrating neutrophils which accumulate in large numbers can undergo netosis [5,6].

This is a phenomenon where long threads (Nets) rich in a nucleosome and in cationic histone and also in various other highly toxic cationic peptides are formed. Such poly cations can function not only as bactericidal and cytocidal agents but, also as potent opsonic agents [7] possessing properties similar to antibodies. Thus, by binding by strong electrostatic forces to negatively-charged domains in immune complexes, complement components and also upon staphylococcal cells, these highlycharge cationic polyelectrolytes may facilitate the deposition and internalization of immune complexes and staphylococci not only by professional phagocytes such as neutrophils and macrophages but, also by endothelial cell, adipocytes keratinocytes, and also by epithelial cells [8,9].

Intra cellularly, staphylococci may now be protected and can survive unharmed until the immune system of the host is lowered and can then have a chance for are attack employing their rich arsenal of pro-inflammatory agents [1,2] causing injury to skin cells.

Eventually, however, the major damage induced to skin cells, may be due to migrating PMNs and their released toxic agents. Upon in situ activation, PMNs can shed out into the surrounding media a plethora of pro-inflammatory agents [10-13]. These include: reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, HOCl, cationic histone, cationic elastase, other poteinases, defensins, LL37, cathelicidines, phospholipase A2, and lysophosphatides.

However, these agents can now also be available to further act in a synergistic manner with the plethora of pro-inflammatory agonist released by staphylococci to cause injury to skin cells [2]. The staphylococcal agents released include: α, β, γ and δ hemolysins (leukocidins), toxic shock syndrome toxin, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, a phospholipase, coagulase and deoxyribonuclease, and staphylokinase.

However, damage to skin in AD may also be significantly aggravated by the phenomenon of bacterioysis [14].

This is a process where cationic peptides such as histones, cationic lysozyme and certain antibiotics [15] may activate the autolytic wall enzymes of Staphylococcus aureus to release into the surrounding media toxic cell wall components such as lipoteichoic acid peptidoglycan and endotoxins [14]. Non biodegraable cell wall components of bacteria may also persist for a long time within macrophage to further cause chronic damage to skin [16,17].

Intra cellularly, viable staphylococci may be now protected and can survive unharmed until the immune system the host is lowered and can now have a chance for a re attack employing their rich arsenal of pro-inflammatory agents [2] to injure the skin cells [18-24].

To ameliorate and perhaps also prevent skin damage as seen in staphylococcal-induced AD, it might be suggested to administer highly anionic heparin and heparinoids which may be able to effectively neutralize polycations [25]. However, this is provided that multi drug strategies [26] including agents such as corticosteroids, methotrexate, colchicine, cyclophosphamide and additional suppressors of the PMNs functions chemotaxis and phagocytosis and also antibiotics such as vancomycine, be also used.

Recent reports approved new, injectable biologic monoclonal antibody called dupilumab (Dupixent) which is used to treat people with severe disease who do not respond well to other treatment options [27,28].These newer medication, don't have a long track record in terms of how well it helps people. Also, creams containing drugs called calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus (Protopic) and pimecrolimus (Elidel) affect the immune system. They are used by people older than age 2 to help control the skin reaction.

Conclusion

The present short presentation suggests a novel approach which may shed a new light on how staphylococci and their secreted pro-inflammatory agent [2] and immune complexes can act in concert with polycations, and with exo products released from activated PMNs [10-13] to injure skin as seen in AD. Internalized staphylococci [18-24] may persist intra cellularly, unharmed, and capable of re-emerging from cells to re attack skin. Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis with Biologic Drugs my better ameliorate the viscous toxic cycles [27,28].

References

  1. Gordon RJ, Lowy FD. Pathogenesis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:S350-S359.
  2. Grumann D, Nübel U, Bröker BM. Staphylococcus aureus toxins: their functions and genetics. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:583-592.
  3. Mölne L, Verdrengh M, Tarkowski A. Role of neutrophil in cutaneous infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Infec Immun. 2000;68:6162-6167.
  4. Cipriani F, Rocci G, Leoni MC, Capta L, Baviea G, Longo G, et al. Autoimmunity in atopic dermatitis: Biomarker or simply epiphenomenon? J Dermatol. 2014;41:569-576.
  5. Yang H, Biermann MH, Brauner JM, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Herrmann M. New insights into neutrophil extracellular traps: Mechanisms of formation and role in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:302.
  6. Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Beneficial suicide: why neutrophils die to make NETs. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:577-582.
  7. Ginsburg I. Cationic poly electrolytes: A New Look at Their Possible Roles as Opsonins, as Stimulators of Respiratory Burst in Leukocytes, in Bacteriolysis, and as Modulators of Immune Complex Diseases (A Review Hypothesis). Inflammation. 1987;11:489-515.
  8. Ginsburg I, Sela MN, Morag A, Ravid Z, Duchan Z, Ferne M, et al. Role of leukocyte factors and cationic polyelectrolytes in phagocytosis of group A streptococci and Candida albicans by neutrophils, macrophages, fibroblasts and epithelial cells: modulation by anionic polyelectrolytes in relation to pathogenesis of chronic inflammation. Inflammation. 1981;5:289-312.
  9. Hubner GE, Voigt WH, Schlumberger HD, Ginsburg I. Poly-L-arginine 'opsonizes' nuclei for phagocytosis by mouse fibroblasts. Science. 1985;13:934-935.
  10. Ginsburg I, Kohen R. Synergistic effects among oxidants, membrane-damaging agents, fatty acids, proteinases and xenobiotics: killing of epithelial cells and the release of arachidonic acid. Inflammation. 1995;19:101-118.
  11. Ginsburg I, Kohen R. Cell damage in inflammatory and infectious sites might involve a coordinated “cross-talk’’ among oxidants, microbial haemolysins, and ampiphiles, cationic proteins, phospholipases, fatty acids, proteinases and cytokines. Free Rad Res. 1995;22:489-517
  12. Ginsburg I, Misgav R, Pinson A,Varani J, Ward PA, Kohen R. Synergism among oxidants, proteinases, phospholipases, microbial hemolysins, cationic proteins, and cytokines. Inflammation. 1992;16:519-538.
  13. Ginsburg I, Mitra RS, Gibbs DF, Varani J, Kohen R. Killing of endothelial cells and release of arachidonic acid: Synergistic effects among hydrogen peroxide, membrane-damaging agents, cationic substances and proteinases and their modulation by inhibitors. Inflammation. 1993;17:295-319.                              
  14. Ginsburg I, Koren E. Is Bacteriolysis-a mere laboratory Critical Reviews in Microbiology. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2018;44.
  15. Wecke J, Lahav M, Ginsburg I, Giesbrecht P. Cell wall degradation of Staphylococcus aureus by lysozyme. Arch Microbiol. 1982;131:116-123.
  16. Clark RL, Cuttino JT Jr, Anderle SK, Cromartie WJ, Schwab JH. Radiologic analysis of arthritis in rats after systemic injection of streptococcal cell walls. Arthritis Rheum 1979;22; 25-35.
  17. Schwab JH. Phlogistic properties of peptidoglycan-polysaccharide polymers from cell walls of pathogenic and normal-flora bacteria which colonize humans. Infect Immun. 1993;61:4535-4539.
  18. Gresham, Jon H. Lowrance, Tony E. Caver, Bridget S. Wilson, Ambrose L. Cheung andFrederik P. Lindberg Survival of Staphylococcus aureus Inside Neutrophils Contributes to Infection Hattie D. J Immunology 2000;164:3713-3737.
  19. Cano LV, Mor D, Regueiro V, Domínguez-Villanueva D, Laabei M, et al. Investigating intracellular persistence of Staphylococcus aureus within a murine alveolar macrophage cell line. Virulence. 2017;8:1761-1775.
  20. Kapralfa FA, Shaygmann MG. Intracellular survival of staphylococci. J Exp Med. 1959;110:123-138.
  21. Gresham HD, Lowrance JH, Caver TE, Wilson BS, Cheung AL, Lindberg FP. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus Inside Neutrophils Contributes to Infection. J Immunol. 2000;164;3713-3737.
  22. Singh SK. Staphylococcus aureus intracellular survival: A closer look in the process. Virulence. 2017; 8:1506-1507.
  23. von Eiff C, Becker K, Metze D, Lubritz G, Hockmann J, Schwarz T, et al. Intracellular persistence of Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variantswithin keratinocytes: a cause for antibiotic treatment failure in a patient with darier's disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1643-1647.
  24. Iwatsuki K, Yamasaki O, Morizane S, Oono T. Staphylococcal cutaneous infections: invasion, evasion and aggression. J Dermatol Sci. 2006;42:203-214.
  25. Wildhagen KC, García de Frutos P, Reutelingsperger CP, Schrijver R, Aresté C, Ortega-Gómez A, et al. Nonanticoagulant heparin prevents histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and improves survival in sepsis. Blood. 2014;123:1098-1101.
  26. Ginsburg I. Multi-drug strategies are necessary to inhibit the synergistic mechanism causing tissue damage and organ failure in post infectious sequelae. Inflammopharmacology. 1999;7:207-217.
  27. Hajar T, Gontijo JRV, Hanifin JM. New and developing therapies for atopic dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;8:527-538.
  28. Fabbrocini G, Napolitano M, Megna M, Balato N, Patruno C. Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis with Biologic Drugs. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018;8:527-538.

Author Info

Isaac Ginsburg1* and Erez Koren2
 
1Faculty of Dental Medicine, Institute for Dental Research, Ein Kerem Campus, The Hebew University, Jerusalem, Israel
2Department of Dental research, Clexio Biosciences LTD, Raanana, Israel
 

Citation: Ginsburg I, Koren E (2019) A Novel Approach That May Explain the Role of Staphylococcus aureus, Polycations, Neutrophils Pro-Inflammatory Agonists and the Bacteriolysis and Auto Immune Phenomema as Possible Major Events in the Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis: A Working Hypothesis. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res. 10: 5. DOI: 10.35248/2155-9554.19.10.508

Received: 26-Sep-2019 Accepted: 11-Oct-2019 Published: 18-Oct-2019 , DOI: 10.35248/2155-9554.19.10.508

Copyright: © 2019 Ginsburg I, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top
https://www.olimpbase.org/1937/