ISSN: 1920-4159
+44 1300 500008
Research Article - (2018) Volume 10, Issue 3
A highly specific, easy to perform and cost effective color test for benzodiazepines class has been developed. This colour test produced green colour with eight benzodiazepines i.e. nitrazepam, temazepam, diazepam, bromazepam, clonazepam, estazolam, lormetazolam and alprazolam, whereas developed color was absent in other controlled or pharmaceutical substances tested during study. In this color test, one drop of concentrated hydrochloric acid was added to test substrate. Then two drops of cobalt thiocyante reagent were added in subsequently which resulted in an immediate appearance of green color. So this test can be very helpful as a presumptive screening tool for benzodiazepines testing in suspected illicit samples and pharmaceuticals. Moreover, this test can be further employed for diazepam quantitation using ultraviolet spectroscopy at 364 nm wavelength and showed linear detector response. A regression co-efficient value of 0.9996 was achieved using developed method and was effectively useful for diazepam quantitation in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Keywords: Presumptive color testing; Benzodiazepine analysis; Benzodiazepines; Diazepam quantitation
Benzodiazepines are psychoactive compounds having a structure which is combination of benzene and diazepine ring. The whole group of such compounds is called “Benzos” [1,2].
Benzos are frequently prescribed to treat certain ailments. Due to sedative properties, they have a high potential for abuse [3,4] especially when used with other depressants such alcohol and opiates [5,6]. Commonly prescribed benzodiazepines are Xanax (alprazolam), Librium (chlordiazepoxide), Valium (diazepam) and Ativan (lorazepam) (Figure 1).
There are few methods for the colorimetric identification of benzodiazepines in the forensic drug testing and toxicological laboratories. Two types of tests are performed for the identification of drug namely preliminary test and confirmatory test [7-9]. In case of diazepam which is abundantly abused among others benzos not many color test are available in literature. However, for diazepam and flunitrazepam, two different color reactions are available [10,11]. No single color test is available for the benzos as a whole. The object of this preliminary study was to find a single color test for benzos which could give some indication of the benzodiazepine group. Zimmermann’s Reaction was applied for identification of benzos but the test does not give clear indication due to double shade (reddish purple) [12- 14]. Herein a new presumptive color test for the identification of benzodiazepines has been developed. This test is rapid, easy to perform, economical and has reasonable sensitivity towards tested benzos. Another advantage of this test is that it can be used for quantitation of benzos along with its presumptive identification.
Materials
• Cobalt thiocyanate, Chlorpheniramine maleate and Diazepam were imported from Sigma-Aldrich, spruce street St. Louis.
• Analytical grade solvents Hydrochloric acid 37%, n-Hexane 99%, chloroform 99.8%, toluene 99.6%, acetone, isopropanol as well as analytical grade chemicals Sodium hydroxide, Diphenhydramine, Quinine Sulfate, Ditheoximide, Vanillin, Caffeine, Sodium hydrogen tartrate, Calcium carbonate, Hydroxylamine, were purchased from Acros organics new jersey USA.
• Deionized water was used for reagent preparations. Absolute Ethanol was purchased from Merck Darmstadt Germany.
• Sodium Chloride, Sulfamic Acid, Starch, Lactose, and analytical grade methanol were bought from Fischer Scientific Bioreagents Fair Lawn New Jersey USA.
• Oxytetracycline, meloxicam and albendazole were taken as generous gift from Venus pharmaceuticals Lahore.
• Tablets, capsules and injections were acquired from different pharmacies (Table 1).
S.No | Compound | Brand Used | Manufacturer |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Temazepam | Restoril | Novartis Pharma Limited Pakistan |
2 | Clonazepam | Clonatril | PolyfineChempharma (PVT) Ltd |
3 | Estalozolam | Esilgan | Helix Pharma (Pvt) Limited |
4 | Alprazolam | Xanas | Pfizer Ltd Pakistan |
5 | Lormetazepam | Noctamide | Bayer Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd |
6 | Chlordiazepoxide | Librex | Roche Pakistan Ltd |
7 | Lorazepam | Ativan | Wyeth Pakistan Limited |
8 | Bromazepam | Bromalex | Indus Pharma (Pvt)Ltd |
9 | Nitrazepam | Mogadon | Valeant Pharmaceutical International. Inc. |
10 | Ketamine | Ketasol | Indus Pharma (Pvt) Ltd |
11 | Naproxen | Synflex | ICI Pakistan Ltd Karachi |
12 | Nortryptaline | Modrin | Pharmedic Laboratories (Pvt) Ltd |
13 | Bupivacine | Bupicaine | Lahore Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works (Pvt) LTD |
14 | Morphine sulphate | Magnus MR | AGP (Pvt) Ltd. |
15 | Phenobarbitol | Phenobarbitone Sodium | Ameer Pharma (Pvt) Ltd Lahore |
16 | Atenolol | Tenormin | ICI Pakistan Limited Karachi |
17 | Mafenamic acid | Ponstan | Pfizer Ltd Pakistan |
18 | Furosemide | Laxis | Sanofi Aventis (Pakistan) Ltd |
19 | Hydroxyzine HCl | Atarax | Pfizer Ltd Pakistan |
20 | Aspirin | Disprin | Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd |
21 | Flurbiprofen | Ansaid | Pfizer Ltd Pakistan |
Table 1: Compound obtained from Pharmacies, Brand Used and Manufacturer.
Instrumentations
• TurboVap Model#10430 (Harris oaks Blvd Suite C Chariotte NC 28269 USA) was used for solvent drying.
• Fisher digital vortex mixer model# 945416 was used for sample mixing.
• Eppendorf centrifuge model 5810 was used for phase separation.
• Gas Chromatograph-Mass Spectrometry (GC model # 7890AMass Spectrometer model #5975C with triple axis detector Agilent technologies).
• Fourier Transform Infrared spectrophotometer (Thermo-Fischer scientific Model # Nicolet is 10) was used for confirmation of extracted samples.
• UV-Visible spectrophotometer Evolution 300 was used for the quantitation of Diazepam.
• Analytical balance (Mettler Toledo PL 303) was used for the weighing purposes
Reagent preparation: 2% cobalt thiocyanate solution was prepared by adding 2 grams of cobalt thiocyanate powder in 100 ml Deionized water.
Extraction procedure: Extraction procedure for various types of dosage forms i.e. tablets, capsules or injectable is given in Table 2.
Compounds | Extraction Solvent | Method for extraction |
---|---|---|
Alprazolam, Clonazepam, Lorazepam, Temazepam, Naproxen, Atenolol, Furosemide, Aspirin, Flurbiprofen |
Acetone | Randomly selected tablet was Ground to powder and shifted to centrifuge tube. 2 ml extraction solvent was added to tablet powder and vortexed for 3 mins. Set the extraction mixture at rotator for 15 min at 50 rpm. The sample mixture was centrifuged for 4 mins @ 3500 rpm. Shifted the supernatant liquid to round bottom tube. Sample extraction procedure was repeated thrice for ensuring complete drug extraction. Solvent was evaporated on turbo evaporator @ 45°C and 15PSI air pressure to get fine drug powder. Powder was subjected to GC-MS/FTIR analysis prior to colorimetric testing. |
Bromazepam, Nitrazepam, Nortryptaline, Bupivacine, Phenobarbitol | Chloroform | Same as described above |
Lormetazepam | Toluene | Same as described above |
Ketamine | Methylene Chloride | Ketamine injection solution was transferred to tube and 2 ml chloroform was added. Vortexed for 4 min. chloroform was pipetted out and discarded whereas aqueous layer was basifiedusing 50 mg sodium carbonate powder. 2 ml methylene chloride was added to aqueous phase and vortexed. Set the extraction mixture at rotator for 15 min at rate of 50 rpm. The sample mixture was centrifuged for@ 3500 rpm for 4 mins. Shifted the extraction solvent to a round bottom tube. Sample extraction procedure was repeated thrice for ensuring complete drug extraction. Solvent was evaporated on turbo evaporator @ 45°C and 15PSI air pressure to get drug powder. Powder was subjected to FTIR analysis prior to colorimetric testing. |
Morphine sulphate | Isopropyl Alcohol and Chloroform in 1:2 | Granules from morphine sulphate capsules were ground and transferred to a centrifuge tube. 0.5 ml of Ammonium Hydroxide was added and vortexed. 3 ml of extraction solvent was added. The whole solution was vortexed for 3 mins again and set on rotator for 15 mins @ 50 rpm The sample mixture was centrifuged for @ 3500 rpm for 4 mins. Shifted the extraction phase in another glass tube. Sample extraction procedure was repeated thrice for ensuring complete drug extraction. Solvent was evaporated on turbo evaporator @ 45°C and 15 PSI air pressure to get fine drug powder. Powder was subjected to FTIR analysis prior to colorimetric testing. |
Hydroxyzine | Hexane | Tablet was ground to powder and shifted in centrifuge tube. 2 ml water was added to powder. Solution was vortexed and centrifuged. Liquid phase was transferred in another tube and 0.5N NaOH (ca. 3 ml) was added and vortexed. Extraction solvent was added and set on rotator for 15 mins @ 50 rpm followed by centrifugation for 4 mins @3500 rpm (hexane was in top layer). Hexane was shifted in glass tube. Sample extraction procedure was repeated thrice for ensuring complete drug extraction. Solvent was divided in two portions. HCL Fumes were passed through one portion as a result precipitates of hydroxyzine HCL were formed and collected. Second portion was evaporated on turbo evaporator @ 45°C and 15 PSI air pressure to get fine drug powder (base form). Both powders were confirmed by FTIR analysis prior to colorimetric testing. |
Chloroquinine | Chloroform | Tablet was ground to fine powder and shifted to centrifuge tube. 2-3 ml of water was added. The solution was vortexed for 3 mins followed by centrifugation @ 3500 rpm for 4 mins. Supernatant liquid was pipetted out to another tube and 1 ml of 1N NaOH was added and vortexed. Then 2 ml Chloroform was added and set on rotator @ 50 rpm for 20 minutes. After centrifugation, Chloroform layer was shifted to glass tube. Sample extraction procedure was repeated thrice for ensuring complete drug extraction. Solvent was evaporated on turbo evaporator @ 45°C and 15 PSI air pressure to get fine drug powder. Powder was subjected to FTIR analysis prior to colorimetric testing. |
Table 2: List of Drugs and their Extraction procedures applied.
Color test procedure: Two glass culture tubes were taken and labelled as “Control” and “Sample”. In the control tube, one drop of Conc. HCl was added followed by the addition of two drops of Cobalt thiocyanate reagent whereas in the sample tube, a pinch of test powder was placed in sample tube and added one drop of Conc. HCl followed by the addition of two drops of Cobalt thiocyanate reagent. Any change or transition of color and its shifting to suitable organic solvent was noted.
Method for diazepam quantitation
Standard solution: 10 mg of Diazepam powder standard was dissolved in 10 ml of chloroform for making standard stock solution (1 mg/ml). Aliquot concentrations (250, 300, 350, 400, 450 and 500) μg/ml were taken in labelled glass tube by using micropipette. 500 μl of chloroform was taken in glass tube and marked as blank sample. Two concentration levels of 315 μg/ml and 475 μg/ml were prepared as Qc Low and Qc High respectively. All the tubes were completely dried in air stream using turbo evaporator. Color test was performed in “control tube” and “sample tubes” by adding 0.5 ml of conc. HCl followed by addition of 0.5 ml of Cobalt thiocyanate solution. Vortex it thoroughly then 2 ml chloroform was added for extraction of color in chloroform for quantitation. Chloroform from control tube and each calibrator was pipetted out in other tube. Each tube was extracted with chloroform three time. The tubes were dried on dry bath incubator at 60ºC for solvent evaporation. Finally the tubes were reconstituted with 2 ml chloroform. The standard solutions were run on ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer for checking of absorbance at 364 nm. Instrumental method parameters for diazepam quantitation are shown in Table 3.
Method Parameter | |
---|---|
Quant Mode | Single wavelength |
Wavelength 1 | 364.00 nm |
Lamp | Xenon |
Bandwidth | 2.0 nm |
Standards | 6 |
Replicates | 3 |
Initial curve fit | Linear |
Conc. Units | µg |
Conc. Dec Places | 3 |
Table 3: Method parameter employed during Diazepam quantitation.
Following parameters are evaluated for validation of abovementioned quantitation method.
• Linearity
• Accuracy and precision
• Limit of detection (LOD)
• Limit of quantitation (LOQ)
• Specificity / Interference
• Solution stability
Procedure for diazepam quantitation from pharmaceutical dosage form
Step-1 (Extraction):
Tablets: One tablet was randomly selected and grounded to fine powder. Powder was shifted in eppendorf centrifuge tubes with the addition of 2 ml Chloroform as extraction medium. Sample mixture was vortexed for 3 minutes. Then sample mixture was centrifuged @4500 rpm. The supernatant was pipetted out in separate glass tube. Each tablet was extracted four times with Chloroform. Supernatant was placed on hot plate for solvent evaporation to get fine diazepam powder.
Injections: One injection was taken and transferred into eppendorf tubes. Chloroform was added in it. After addition of chloroform tablet was vortexed for 3 minutes and then centrifuged @4500 rpm. Chloroform was pipetted out in separate glass tube. Each injection was extracted four times with Chloroform and chloroform was collected in same tube for one injection. After completion of extraction, glass tube with chloroform was placed on hot plate for evaporation of chloroform to get diazepam.
Step-2 (Quantitation): After drying color test is performed by adding 0.5 ml of conc. HCl followed by 0.5 ml of Cobalt thiocyanate solution. Vortex it thoroughly then 2 ml chloroform is added for extraction of color in chloroform for quantitation. Then 400 ul from each tube is taken separately and 2 ml volume was made up by adding 1600 ul of chloroform for making final dilution. The final dilution was checked for their absorbance ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer at 364 nm. Controls were always run with each batch.
Results
An immediate green color was developed with abovementioned benzodiazepines on addition of cobalt thiocyanate reagent (Figure 2-5). When ammonium thiocyanate was tried instead of cobalt thiocyanate reagent, the green color didn’t appeared. Moreover oxytetracycline and diphenhydramine produced different colors (Figures 5-7). The observed green color in case of benzodiazepines or colors produced by other drugs were checked for their shiftibilty in organic solvents. It was found that green color was completely shiftable in chloroform and methylene chloride in case of diazepam while Green color developed by temazepam was only shiftable in chloroform (Table 4). Color produced by lorazepam and nitrazepam didn’t show any shiftibilty in organic solvents (Figure 4). Colors developed by Meloxicam, naproxin were completely shiftable in methylene chloride only while colors observed in case of bupvacaine and chlordiazepoxide were shiftable in chloroform (Table 4).
S.No | Drug Name | Color Observation | S.no | Drug Name | Color Observation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Temazepam | Green color | 26 | Sodium Hydrogen Tatarate | No Color |
2 | Diazepam | Green color | 27 | Sulfamic Acid | No Color |
3 | Estalozolam | Green color | 28 | Calcium Carbonate | No Color |
4 | Alprazolam | Green color | 29 | Hydroxyl amine | Purple colour |
5 | Lormetazepam | Green color | 30 | Nortryptaline | blue color |
6 | Chlordiazepoxide | Blue colour | 31 | Bupivacine | Blue color of drug |
7 | Lorazepam | Green color | 32 | Cannabis Resin | No Color |
8 | Clonazepam | Green color | 33 | Opium | No Color |
9 | Bromazepam | Green color | 34 | Glusose | No Color |
10 | Nitrazepam | Green Color | 35 | Starch | No Color |
11 | Albandazole | Bright blue drug ppts. | 36 | Lactose | No Color |
12 | Meloxicam | Blue Color | 37 | Morphine sulphate | No Color |
13 | Oxytetracycline | Dark greenish yellow color | 38 | Phenobarbitol | No Color |
14 | Diphenhydramine | Blue color | 39 | Atenolol | No Color |
15 | NaCl | No Color | 40 | Ephedrine | No Color |
16 | Pyrimethamine | No Color | 41 | Chlorphenaramine maleate | No Color |
17 | Methyl Phenidate | No Color | 42 | Flurbiprofen | No Color |
18 | Quinine | No Color | 43 | Methamphetamine | No Color |
19 | Dithiooxamide | No Color | 44 | Mafenamic acid | No Color |
20 | Chloroquinine | No Color | 45 | Silica | No Color |
21 | Vaniline | No Color | 46 | Furosemide | No Color |
22 | Caffeine | No Color | 47 | Cobalt Chloride | No Color |
23 | Ketamine | No Color | 48 | Hydroxyzine HCl | No Color |
24 | Diclofenac Sodium | No Color | 49 | Aspirin | No Color |
25 | Naproxen | Blue color | 50 | Stearic Acid | No Color |
Table 4: List of different tested compounds and their reaction colour.
For study accuracy of diazepam quantitation method three different conc. 250 μg/ml, 300 μg/ml and 400 μg/ml were taken and absorbance value was noted for three days.
Following are the calculations done for accuracy and precision studies.
Limit of detection
The detection limit was determined by the analysis of samples with known concentrations of analyte via visual evaluation and by establishing the minimum level at which the analyte was reliably detected.
It was found that 8 μg/ml is LOD for detection of diazepam with this method (Tables 5-8).
Compound | Suitable solvent for shifting of Colour |
---|---|
Chlordiazepoxide | Chloroform |
Diazepam | Chloroform, Methylene Chloride |
Temazepam | Chloroform |
Meloxicam | Methylene Chloride |
Naproxen | Methylene Chloride |
Bupivacaine | Chloroform |
Table 5: Benzodiazepine color and suitable solvent for its shifting.
Calibratior (µg/ml) | Absorbance (A°) at 364 nm |
---|---|
250 | 1.064 |
300 | 1.285 |
350 | 1.512 |
400 | 1.711 |
450 | 1.935 |
500 | 2.168 |
Table 6: Calibration Curve for Diazepam Quantitation.
Linearity Parameters | |
---|---|
Range | 250 – 500 µg/ml |
Slope | 0.0044 |
Intercept | 0.0310 |
Co-relation coefficient | 0.9996 |
Solution Stability | 6 days |
Accuracy | 99.50 +/- 0.54 |
Mean Recovery(% Raw Material) | 99.60 +/- 0.44 |
LOD | 10 µg/ml |
LOQ | 25 µg/ml |
Table 7: Linearity Parameters.
Calibrator (µg/ml) |
Day | Mean Conc. Recovered (µg) | Standard Deviation | Accuracy | Precision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
250 | 1 | 247.83 | 0.55% | 99.1% | 0.22% |
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
300 | 1 | 295.16 | 0.50 | 98.39% | 0.17% |
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
400 | 1 | 399.55 | 0.84 | 99.88% | 0.21 % |
Table 8: Calibration Curve for Diazepam Quantitation.
Limit of quantitation
25 μg/ml is LOQ for quantitation of diazepam by above mentioned method.
Stability study
Stability studies are done in two different ways.
Intraday stability study: In this study standard solution of 300 μg/ml is prepared and run on UV-Visible spectrophotometer and its Absorption is noted. This solution was then transferred to screw capped glass tube and its absorbance is noted after every 3 hour at 364 nm till 12 hours consecutively and following calculation are done to check stability.
Interday stability study: In this study standard solution of 300 μg/ml is prepared and run on UV-Visible spectrophotometer and its Absorption is noted. This solution was then transferred to screw capped glass tube and its absorbance is noted after each day for consecutive 5 days at 364 nm and following calculation are done to check stability (Tables 9-11).
Day | Accuracy | Precision |
---|---|---|
1 | Accuracy at 250 µg/ml = (247.83-250)/250 x 100 = - 0.868 % or 99.1% |
Precision at 250 µg/ml = (0.55/247.83) x 100 = 0.22% |
2 | Accuracy at 300 µg/ml = (295.16-300)/300 x 100 = -1.61% or 98.39 % |
Precision at 300 µg/ml =(0.50/295.16) x 100 = 0.17 % |
3 | Accuracy at 400 µg/ml = (399.55-400)/400 x 100 = - 0.125 % or 99.88 % |
Precision at 400 µg/ml = (0.84/399.55) x 100 = 0.21 % |
Table 9: Accuracy & Precision Determination for Diazepam-cobalt thiocyanate complex Quantitation.
Calibrator Concentration | Absorbance | Standard deviation of Response | LOD =3.3 x Std. deviation of response/ Slope of response = (3.3 * 0.014 ) / 0.0057 |
---|---|---|---|
250 µg/ml | 1.431 | 0.014653024 |
8.48332966 |
Table 10: Calculation for limit of detection.
Calibrator Concentration | Absorbance | Standard deviation of response | LOD =10 * std. deviation of response/ slope of response = (10 * 0.014 ) / 0.0057 |
---|---|---|---|
250 µg/ml | 1.431 | 0.014653024 | 25.70705958 |
250 µg/ml | 1.454 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.47 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.445 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.435 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.465 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.439 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.459 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.469 | ||
250 µg/ml | 1.439 |
Table 11: Calculation for determining LOQ.
Compounds like Stearic acid, Magnesium stearate, Starch, Lactose, Talc, silica, cellulose, mannitol, caffeine and gelatin was run individually on UV-VIS to check interference at wavelength 364 nm. No compound showed any interference at 364 nm (Tables 12 and 13).
Time (hr) | Quantity (300 µg/ml) | Absoption (A°) | Concentration recovered (300 µg/ml) | %age concentration | Quantity deficient | %age error | Average | Standard deviation | %RSD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 HR | Solution 1 | 1.25 | 299.76 | 99.92 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 99.84 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Solution 2 | 1.25 | 299.52 | 99.84 | 0.48 | 0.16 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.25 | 299.29 | 99.76 | 0.71 | 0.24 | ||||
3 HR | Solution 1 | 1.25 | 298.57 | 99.52 | 1.43 | 0.48 | 99.60 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Solution 2 | 1.25 | 299.05 | 99.68 | 0.95 | 0.32 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.25 | 298.81 | 99.60 | 1.19 | 0.40 | ||||
6 HR | Solution 1 | 1.25 | 298.10 | 99.37 | 1.90 | 0.63 | 99.37 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Solution 2 | 1.25 | 298.33 | 99.44 | 1.67 | 0.56 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.25 | 297.86 | 99.29 | 2.14 | 0.71 | ||||
9 HR | Solution 1 | 1.24 | 296.67 | 98.89 | 3.33 | 1.11 | 99.02 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
Solution 2 | 1.24 | 297.14 | 99.05 | 2.86 | 0.95 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.24 | 297.38 | 99.13 | 2.62 | 0.87 | ||||
12 HR | Solution 1 | 1.24 | 295.95 | 98.65 | 4.05 | 1.35 | 98.52 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
Solution 2 | 1.24 | 295.24 | 98.41 | 4.76 | 1.59 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.24 | 295.48 | 98.49 | 4.52 | 1.51 |
Table 12A: Intraday stability study.
Average of recovered quantity | Accuracy within day (12 hours) = 100X calculated conc-Known conc/known conc | Precision within day (12 hours) =(SD/quantity calculated)*100 |
---|---|---|
299.52 | 99.84 | 0.03 |
298.81 | 99.60 | 0.03 |
298.10 | 99.37 | 0.03 |
297.06 | 99.02 | 0.04 |
295.56 | 98.52 | 0.04 |
Table 12B: Intraday stability study.
Time (hr) | Quantity (300 ug/ml) | absoption (A°) | concentration recovered (300 mg/ml) | %age concentration | Quantity deficiet | %or | Average | Standard deviation | %RSD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 day | Solution 1 | 1.22 | 291.90 | 97.30 | 8.10 | 3.24 | 97.41 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
Solution 2 | 1.22 | 292.62 | 97.54 | 7.38 | 2.95 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.22 | 292.14 | 97.38 | 7.86 | 3.14 | ||||
2 day | Solution 1 | 1.21 | 289.76 | 96.59 | 10.24 | 3.41 | 96.72 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
Solution 2 | 1.22 | 290.48 | 96.83 | 9.52 | 3.17 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.21 | 290.24 | 96.75 | 9.76 | 3.25 | ||||
3 day | Solution 1 | 1.21 | 289.05 | 96.35 | 10.95 | 3.65 | 96.35 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
Solution 2 | 1.21 | 288.57 | 96.19 | 11.43 | 3.81 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.21 | 289.52 | 96.51 | 10.48 | 3.49 | ||||
4 day | Solution 1 | 1.20 | 287.14 | 95.71 | 12.86 | 4.29 | 95.61 | 0.18 | 0.19 |
Solution 2 | 1.20 | 286.19 | 95.40 | 13.81 | 4.60 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.20 | 287.14 | 95.71 | 12.86 | 4.29 | ||||
5 day | Solution 1 | 1.20 | 286.19 | 95.40 | 13.81 | 4.60 | 95.13 | 0.28 | 0.29 |
Solution 2 | 1.19 | 284.52 | 94.84 | 15.48 | 5.16 | ||||
Solution 3 | 1.19 | 285.48 | 95.16 | 14.52 | 4.84 |
Table 13A: Interday stability study.
Day | Average | Accuracy within day (5 days) | Precision within day (5 Days) =(SD/quantity calculated)*100 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 292.22 | 97.41 | 0.04 |
2 | 290.16 | 96.72 | 0.04 |
3 | 289.05 | 96.35 | 0.05 |
4 | 286.83 | 95.61 | 0.06 |
5 | 285.40 | 95.13 | 0.10 |
Table 13B: Interday stability study.
Reaction of hydrochloric on benzodiazepines resulted in the formation of benzophenone [15] which immediately reacted with added cobalt thiocyanate, producing a green color because thiocyanate share negative charge approximately equally between sulfur and nitrogen. As a consequence act as nucleophiles at either sulfur or nitrogen which describes the mechanistic behavior evolving in this reaction. The complexes of cobalt thiocyanate formed in aqueous media were found to consist of two species-[Co(SCS)]+ and [Co(NCS)6]-4 with the number of possible water molecules in the coordination spheres undetermined. The complex [Co(NCS)]+ is present in aqueous solutions containing an excess of cobalt, while an excess of thiocyanate produces [Co( NCS) a]-2 [16,17]. Previous Studies have shown that many metal thiocyanates can be extracted from aqueous solutions by means of non-polar organic solvents. Absorptancy curves have been run on solutions of cobalt thiocyanate in non-aqueous solvents. Such extractions have been utilized extensively in the isolation of thiocyanate complexes of such metals like iron, uranium, and molybdenum. Moreover, shift of green color to organic solvent can be supported by the observation of Young and Hall [18] where blue color of thiocyante was soluble in ether. Their importance to the present discussion lies in the emphasis they add to the solubility phenomena attributable to the thiocyanate group effect.
FTIR analysis of formed Diazepam-cobalt thiocyanate complex was performed. C=N of diazepam showed a substantial shift from 1607.65 cm-1 to 1628.43 cm-1 which confirm the reaction occurred between diazepam and cobalt thiocyante and support proposed complexes structure. Whereas C=O group (1681 cm-1), C-Cl Stretching (781), Ar. C – H Bending (740 cm-1), Ar. C - C Stretching 1442.8 do not participate in this chemical reaction.
Probably one molecule of cobalt thiocyanate reacted with 2 molcules of diazepam forming dimer. FTIR complex also showed the appearance of band at 2061.71 cm-1
Diazepam showed a significant absorption in ultraviolet region after the formation of complexes with cobalt thiocyanate reagent in acidic medium which were shiftable in the organic layer. During study, no interference was observed with pharmaceutical excipients and confirms the sensitivity and specificity of developed method.
Previously reported tests lack their propensity to produce a single convinced color for different benzodiazepines to imagine them as a definite class. An earlier method described using formaldehydesulfuric acid gives yellow colour with bromazepam while it gives orange color on reacting with diazepam, estazolam lorazepam, lormetazolam, nitrazepam. Similarly, method using alkaline DMSO produced different color for different benzodiazepines [10]. Another drawback of that test was its high sensitivity towards moisture. Zimmermann’s reaction was also applied for the identification of benzos but the test does not give clear indication due to double shade (reddish purple color) [12-14]. whereas our described method have a unique feature to produce a single color (green) and it was found much yonder towards such limitations as reagent was prepared using deionized water.
A new presumptive color test for the identification of eight benzodiazepines has been developed which were tested during study. This test is rapid, easy to perform, economical and has reasonable sensitivity towards benzodiazepines. It can be used for the quantitation of benzodiazepines like diazepam using UV-visible spectroscopy. Experimental data showed that detector response showed a linear behavior with increasing analyte concentration which resulted in reliable quantitation limits.