GET THE APP

Vital Indices to be used in Resuscitation of Patients with Shock
Emergency Medicine: Open Access

Emergency Medicine: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2165-7548

+44 1223 790975

Review Article - (2012) Volume 2, Issue 4

Vital Indices to be used in Resuscitation of Patients with Shock in the Emergency Department Setting

Zohair Al Aseri*
Assistant Professor & Consultant, omi_departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Zohair Al Aseri, FRCPC EM & CCM, Assistant Professor & Consultant, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Tel: +96614671955, Fax: 01196614672529 Email:

Keywords: Shock; Vital indices; Adequate perfusion; Resuscitation; Intensive care, Emergency department (ED)

Introduction

Shock, in general, is failure of cardiovascular system to provide sufficient oxygenated blood to all parts of the body. The world health organization has reported that 60% of deaths in developing countries occurred due to communicable disease which involving shock at variable stage [1]. In developing countries 50% of deaths related to shock occur within the first 24 hours and often shock preceded death [2]. Nearly 750,000 peoples are affected with severe sepsis alone in the USA [3]. Sepsis is the currently 10th leading cause of death in USA with in hospital mortality rate of 30% equating up to 215,000 deaths annually in the USA alone. It is estimated that nearly 500,000 cases of sepsis alone are catered initially in ED annually with an average stay in ED of 5 hours (golden hours of management) [4,5].

There are several factors influencing on the mortality and morbidity related to shock include physician’s failure to recognize the early signs of shock with consequent delayed response to shock management, which may lead up to 54% of mortality probably due to reduced access to health care and to the cost of care particularly in developing countries [5-8].

Therefore, the bedside physician’s skillful early management of shock is very important [7] in one meta analysis significant survival benefit was observed beneficial with the use of an early quantitative resuscitation strategy [9]. Furthermore, in the management of critical shock it is proved that early goal directed therapy (EGDT) decreases significant in- hospital mortality [10].

Since, shock has a critical impact on survival due to its multi organ involvement and grave consequences particularly if un recognized, early recognition of it using shock indices in early course of presentation in ED has fundamental importance for the triaging and resuscitation in the golden hours in the ED department [11-16].

In the line of consideration of above facts we present this article discussing the important indices to be used in ED to managing shock induced critical condition encountered in most vital golden hours on presentation in ED which is recommended in its management [17-19].

Data Sources

Medline search from 1970 to present plus cited reference studies and abstracts from available product literature.

Study Selection

Selection criteria included published articles and abstracts comparing the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic monitors and relation of their use to patient’s outcome.

Discussion

Shock is the pathologic state characterized by significant reduction of systemic tissue perfusion, resulting in decreased tissue oxygen delivery leads to hypoxia. This is an imbalance between oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption. Prolonged oxygen deprivation leads to cellular hypoxia and derangement of critical biochemical processes at the cellular level, which can progress to the systemic level [20,21]. The effects of oxygen deprivation are initially reversible, but become irreversible if untreated eventually lead to cell death, endorgan damage, multi-system organ failure, and death involving cardiac dysfunction which is end results in late stages of all types of shock. This highlights the importance of prompt recognition and reversal of shock [22,23].

Hypotension is cardinal feature of it even it is not inevitable to define the state of shock. Shock is grouped in five main pathophysiologic categories include hypovolemic, distributive, cardiac, obstructive and cytotoxic. The diagnosis and management of shock is the most frequent task encounter to emergency and critical care setting. Clinical findings are varied as per type of shock representing unique etiology, cardinal features i.e., hypotension, oligourea, cool and clammy skin, altered mentation and acidemia are common features found in all types of shock regardless etiology and suggestive features are representing specific etiology. Therefore, early diagnosis can be built on careful history followed by examination and vital indices.

Indices of Successful Resuscitation in the ED

Cardiovascular indices

In the early stage of shock, a surge in catecholamines and neural regulation due to anxiety and stress and other factors maintains mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the expense of decreased tissue perfusion; this explains the absence of hypotension despite the presence of the signs and symptoms of hypoperfusion. MAP is calculated as MAP = BPDIA + (BPSYS − BPDIA)/3, where BPDIA and BPSYS are diastolic and systolic BPs, respectively.

It is fact that in the early course of hypotension prompt management even with fluid alone restores hemodynamic stability [11].

In randomized controlled trials found that early hemodynamic optimization, before the development of organ failure achieve statistically significant reductions in mortality, whereas a >20% mortality were observed in the group where interventions lately introduced [24,25].

In general MAP < 60 mm Hg always should be considered pathologic. Evidence indicates that an MAP of 65 mm Hg can be considered sufficient in most patients with septic shock. To maintain perfusion in one study it was observed that despite > 70 mmHg survival was not improved these variable results need further assessment [26].

MAP is less affected by wave reflection, characteristics of the hemodynamic monitoring system, and small-vessel vasoconstriction than that of systolic BP. It is also more accurate in patients who have low-flow states [27].

Although, the BP is an easy and universal tool for monitoring patient developing shock, studies suggest that defining cut point value determining correct tissue perfusion status is difficult in patients with shock [19,28].This reflects that BP, MAP, and heart rate alone are not considered as adequate indices for detecting tissue hypoxia and hypoperfusion [26,29,30]. As hypertensive subjects need a higher MAP to ensure the same degree of blood flow as compare to non hypertensive patients [31].

Since, Noninvasive measurements of arterial pressure become less reliable in patients who have marked hypovolemia or abnormal cardiac function Oscillometric devices can underestimate systolic blood pressure by as much as 6-19% and overestimate diastolic BP by as much as 5-27% [28].

Although, as a rule hypotension reflects failure of the sympathetic nervous system to compensate for circulatory shock, but normotension does not ensure hemodynamic stability [32]. Partly it is due to fact that changes in vital signs are late findings in shock [33]. A normal blood pressure can be sustained despite loss of up to 30% of blood volume. Despite the fact that tachycardia is independently associated with hypotension, it’s sensitivity and specificity limit its usefulness in the initial evaluation of trauma victims. McGee et al. showed that only 1 in 5 patients demonstrated a postural pulse increment of ≥ 30/min or were unable to stand for vital signs because of severe dizziness after blood loss of 450-630 ml [34]. A systematic evaluation of physical findings in patients with hypovolemia found that a systolic BP <95 mm Hg is not a sensitive measure for ruling out moderate or significant blood loss [35].

Postural hypotension (a >20-mm Hg decrease in systolic BP) provides little additional predictive value. Its sensitivity is only 9% in those younger than 65 years and 27% in those older than 65 years. In data collected from 14,325 trauma patients, aged 16-49 years, presenting to a university-based trauma center, hypotension was present in only 3.3%. Of these patients although expected, as well as, 35% (n = 169) were not tachycardic. However, it was observed that hypotensive patients with tachycardia had a higher mortality rate compared with hypotensive patients who were not tachycardic (P = 0.003). Patients they had both hypotension and tachycardia were associated with increased mortality and warrant careful evaluation [36].

In cardiogenic shock with ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI), the recommended systolic BP is 100 mm Hg but no strong evidence supports this recommendation [37]. Shock index (SI) (calculated as heart rate/systolic BP; normal range, 0.5-0.7) may be useful to evaluate acute critical illness in the ED including trauma cases [38-41]. In prospective study of 275 consecutive adults who presented for urgent medical care, Rady found that with apparently stable vital signs, an abnormal elevation of the SI to >0.9 patients were taken and treated as critical given admission to the hospital, and intensive therapy on admission showed SI as a good marker of impending shock [30].

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is also considered as accurate index of fluid responsiveness in critical setting to fluid loading [39]. It is more reliable than other dynamic parameters such as systolic pressure variation or pulse stroke volume variation and it should be used in decision making for volume expansion [40,41].

In summary, emergency physicians and critical care providers should not depend only on vital signs alone as indices of optimal resuscitation.

Central venous oxygen saturation

Interest has focused on the use of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) in early resuscitation of critically ill patients. It is simply the oxygen saturation of the blood sample taken from the subclavian or internal jugular vein or the right atrium. Its application depends on the concept of oxygen delivery (DO2) theory, which depends on the oxygen content of arterial blood and cardiac output.

Total body oxygen consumption at rest requires only one-quarter of the DO2 needed for tissue metabolism and is affected by factors that increase cellular energy requirements, such as exercise, pain, and hyperthermia. The residual oxygen remains bound to hemoglobin and passes into the venous circulation. ScvO2 also provides an additional method for monitoring the adequacy of resuscitative measures in the early stage of circulatory failure and is useful in the period after resuscitation to help titrate therapy and recognize any sudden deterioration in the patient’s clinical condition [42].

Failure to achieve a ScvO2 of ≥40% has a negative predictive value of almost 100% for restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). ScvO2 also helps to confirm return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rapidly. The patients do not require a pulmonary artery catheter which in itself has been questioned and can lead to adverse outcomes [43].

Reinhart et al compared the course of continuously measured mixed and central venous oxygen saturations in 32 critically ill patients with triple-lumen central vein catheters, including 29 patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization. Their data confirmed the findings of others that in critically ill patients with circulatory failure from various causes ScvO2 is generally higher than SvO2 measured in the pulmonary artery. The average value (bias) for ScvO2 was 7.05% ± 3.98% higher than the SvO2 (precision 7.95%) [44]. It has been further observed that Pulmonary artery catheterization is not associated with reduced mortality in critically ill patients [45,46,47].

Data suggest that the presence of a pathologically low ScvO2 very likely indicates an even lower SvO2. The measurements of ScvO2 can be used to guide therapy for the early phase of circulatory shock in the ED. ScvO2-guided hemodynamic optimization has been shown to reduce mortality In an observational study of 98 consecutive unplanned admissions to a multidisciplinary ICU, a low ScvO2 was associated with increased mortality [48].

Central venous pressure

Central venous pressure (CVP) represents right atrial pressure, which estimates of right ventricular end-diastolic pressure and volume (preload). The normal range for CVP is 4-6 mm Hg. Many factors affect CVP measurements adversely include tricuspid valve disease, pericardial disease, abnormal right ventricular function, dysrhythmias, myocardial disease, pulmonary vascular disease, and changes in intrathoracic pressure produced by positive-pressure ventilation [49].

Isolated measurements of CVP are not reliable in predicting fluid responsiveness [50,51]. CVP has a poor correlation with cardiac index, stroke volume, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and even right ventricular end-diastolic volume [52]. Based on this and the poor correlations described above, it is impossible to define ideal values of CVP.

End-Tidal carbon dioxide

Studies evaluating the perfusion of the splanchnic circulation have used sublingual capnometry. Sublingual capnometry is performed using a sensor placed under the tongue that measures the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the sublingual tissue (PslCO2). Although studies are limited, available data indicate that PslCO2 can be used as a predictor of patient outcome. Normal values for PslCO2 are reported to range from 43 to 47 mm Hg [53] PslCO2 is the difference between PslCO2 and PaCO2, termed the “PslCO2 gap.” A PslCO2 gap of >25 mm Hg is reported to identify patients at a high risk of death [54,55].

The decrease in cardiac output and pulmonary blood flow during cardiac arrest result in decreased elimination of carbon dioxide by the lungs and low PetCO2. Successful resuscitation results in an increase in the cardiac output that will in turn, lead to an increase in PetCO2 [56].

A prospective observational study measured initial PetCO2 and PetCO2 after 1 min of CPR in 76 patients. The PetCO2 levels were compared between the group of patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and the group with cardiac arrest following MI or pulmonary embolism. Only patients with initial pulse less electrical activity (PEA) were included in the study. A significant difference was found between PetCO2 of patients with asphyxial compared to MI/PE cardiac arrest (initial PetCO2 49.9 ± 31.4 vs. 17.2 ± 8.3 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.05; PetCO2 after 1 min of CPR 38.7 ± 20.3 mm Hg vs. 18.9 ± 9.2 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.05). The authors concluded that PetCO2 in PEA possibly indicates the mechanism of cardiac arrest. In combination with other signs, the level of PetCO2 might influence the approach to and treatment of patients with PEA in the out-of-hospital setting. In addition capnographic monitoring is a useful guide to the adequacy of closed cardiac compressions during CPR [57].

A recent prospective semi-blind study involved 47 men and 26 women referred to the ED for respiratory distress. Arterial blood gas pressures and side stream PetCO2 (SSetCO2) measurements were performed and recorded for all patients; a significant correlation was found between SSetCO2 and arterial PCO2 (r = 0.792). A good correlation was found between SSetCO2 and arterial PCO2 in the ED setting. Young age may increase the arterial PCO2/SSetCO2 gradient, whereas a raised temperature may decrease this gradient. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in the normal healthy population [58].

Several studies have demonstrated increased mortality in patients who have either low concentrations of transcutaneous oxygen or high concentrations of carbon dioxide. Marked differences were observed in the survivor and non survivor temporal patterns of PtcO2 , PtcCO2 , and PtcO2 /PtcCO2 values, during initial resuscitation in the ED in 48 consecutive severely injured patients by prospective assessment of PtcO2 and PtcCO2) [59].

To summarize, PetCO2 can be used as reasonable index for optimal resuscitation and in diagnosing and managing some of the critical cases likewise, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, hyperthermia, hypothermia, esophageal intubation, and in cases of decrease or increase in cardiac output).

Sublingual capnography

Sublingual capnography is a technically simple, noninvasive, inexpensive method that is not affected by changes in gastric pH and appears to provide potentially useful prognostic information on adequacy of resuscitation. Weil and coworkers investigated the feasibility and predictive value of sublingual PCO2 measurements as a noninvasive and early indicator of systemic perfusion failure. In a study of patients presenting to the ED in a variety of shock states, they found that sublingual capnography was useful in differentiating between patients with circulatory shock and elevated lactate levels and patients without shock and normal lactate levels [53].

Passive leg raising

Straight-leg raising which is 45° elevation for 4 min while maintaining the trunk supine results in an increase in right and left ventricular preload [54,55].This maneuver may help in predicting individual fluid responsiveness during spontaneous and positivepressure breathing while avoiding the hazards of unnecessary fluid loading [60-62].

Passive leg raising (PLR) is a reversible maneuver that mimics rapid fluid loading (RFL) by shifting venous blood from the legs toward the intrathoracic compartment and by increasing right and left ventricular preloads, thereby increasing stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output. Thus, when SV increases with PLR it should increase with RFL as well. It has been known for a long time that PLR can mimic the hemodynamic effects of RFL. The way by which PLR can alter preload is probably an increase in the mean systemic pressure, the driving force for venous return. Recently, Karim L Oakhal and collegues assessed the influence of PLR-induced changes in preload on the performance of PLR-induced change in pulse pressure (ΔPLRPP) and cardiac output (ΔPLRCO) for fluid responsiveness prediction the result also found to be useful PLR as a valuable assessment tool in intubated and sedated patient in intensive care setting [63].

Lactate and Base Deficit (BD)

As a product of anaerobic glycolysis, lactate is an indirect measure of oxygen debt. As tissue oxygen delivery falls below the threshold required for efficient oxidative phosphorylation, cells metabolize glucose into pyruvate and then lactate rather than entering the Krebs cycle during aerobic metabolism, with the help of pyruvate dehydrogenase. Increasing evidence indicates that inhomogeneity in the regional circulation and microcirculation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction. In experimental and clinical conditions, serum lactate levels are strongly associated with tissue hypoxia [64]. Lactate level are commonly used to stratify risk and to asses adequacy of CPR in the intensive care unit and ED [65-67,25 ]. It is also possible to measure accurate blood lactate using handheld analyzer from venous blood [68,69]. It has been observed that it is an important prognostic and diagnostic indicator in dealing shock Scalea et al. found that 80% of 40 blunt trauma victims with head injuries had elevated blood lactate levels, despite normal vital signs and urine output [70].

In another study Jeng et al noted that the average base deficit and blood lactate level were abnormal despite normal vitals signs in patients with burns resuscitated to normal vital signs and urine output. These finding of increased lactate level and failure to improve it’s level being important prognostically suggestive of vital role of lactate monitoring during management. Base deficit (BD) in perfusion-related metabolic acidosis reflects the amount of base (mmol) required to titrate 1 L whole blood to a normal pH, assuming normal physiologic values of PaO2, PaCO2, and temperature [71-74].

It is well documented that lactate levels >4 mmol/L are strongly associated with worse patient outcomes. Perhaps more important than single values is the time to normalization of lactate levels, termed “lactate clearance time.” Multiple studies have documented the usefulness of lactate clearance time as a predictor of patient mortality [75,76]. A good correlation exists between arterial and venous samples of lactate. The trend of lactate concentrations is a better indicator than a single value and it is a better prognostic indicator than oxygen-derived variables [77,78].

Numerous studies have shown that high lactate concentration in the presence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria is diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic marker of global tissue hypoxia in circulatory shock[79,80,81]. A high lactate level significantly increases ICU admission rates and mortality rates in normotensive patients [24,81-86]. Broder and Weil observed that serum lactate levels >4 mmol/L were associated with a survival of only 11% in critically ill patients [87]. Another study showed that lactate better predicted outcome for patients in septic shock than hemodynamic indices [88]. Weil and Afifi showed that lactate correlated with cumulative oxygen debt and was a predictor for survival [79]. Dunham et al demonstrated that serum lactate and BD are more sensitive than blood pressure or cardiac output in predicting severity and mortality in hemorrhagic shock [89]. The longer the lactate is elevated, the more a patient is likely to develop multi organ dysfunctional syndrome (MODS) and die [80,90-93]. “lactime” has been described as the time during which lactate remains >2 mmol/L and observed that this duration of lactic acidosis was predictive of organ failure and survival. A single measurement has been debated as an indicator of mortality in patient with global hypoperfusion.

It is best to follow lactate levels over time rather than relying on a single value for several reasons first, blood lactate concentrations reflect the interaction between the production and elimination of lactate. For example, a patient with sepsis along with hepatic dysfunction may have a higher lactate concentration compared with a patient without liver disease but with a similar degree of stress. Second, an increased lactate concentration may indicate mechanisms other than cellular hypoxia, such as up-regulation in epinephrine-stimulated Na/K–ATPase activity in skeletal muscle and inhibition of pyruvate metabolism or an increase in its production [25,96-100]. In a randomized, controlled study, Boyd et al. showed improved survival in high-risk surgical patients treated with hyperdynamic means to decrease lactate before, during, and after surgery compared to conventional therapy [97].

In a recent prospective observational study included 111 patients, Nguyen et al found that only lactate clearance was significantly associated with decreased mortality rates in the multivariate comparison (P = 0.04). An approximately 11% decrease in likelihood of mortality was found for each 10% increase in lactate. Patients with higher lactate clearance after 6 h of ED intervention have improved outcomes compared with those with lower lactate clearance. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was then performed using the statistically significant univariate variables. Whether it comes from anaerobic metabolism, inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase, or increased pyruvate production, lactate still correlates with survival. This is also true in the presence of liver failure [25,100,101].

To summarize, in any type of shock the longer the lactate level is elevated, the more likely is a patient to develop MODS and die regardless of the presence or absence of liver failure, Lactate clearance is significantly associated with a decreased mortality rate, It is best to follow lactate levels over time rather than relying on a single value and high lactate concentration in the presence of SIRS criteria is a diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic marker of global tissue hypoxia in circulatory shock.

The BD can indirectly reflect the blood lactate level. BD is the amount of base (in millimoles) required to titrate 1L whole blood to a pH of 7.4 (with 100% oxygen saturation and a PaCO2 of 40). Therefore, the presence of a BD indicates an acidosis, resulting from fixed acids rather than hypercapnea. Unfortunately, it may reflect acidosis not related to elevated levels of lactate.

In a retrospective study of 3791 trauma patients, Rutherford et al found base deficit stratified mortality [100]. Davis et al retrospectively evaluated almost BD values from 3000 trauma patients and determined that admission values identified those likely to need transfusions [101]. One study, looking at 52 trauma patients, discovered no relationship between serum lactate level and BD or anion gap (AG) of note, serum lactate did not get above 5 mmol/L [102]. This is important based on other studies that revealed improved correlation of lactate level with AG as lactate levels rose. Iberti et al showed that 100% of surgical ICU patients with higher lactate levels (>10 mmol/L) had AG values >16 [103]. However, when lactate was between 5 and 9.9 mmol/L, 50% of patients had an AG <16. When lactate levels were <5 mmol/L, 79% of patients had AG values <16. These results may explain why the first study did not show a lactate level and BD correlation. Davis et al reported excellent correlation of BD and blood lactate in a swine hemorrhagic model. It should be noted that lactate levels rose to 10 mmol/L with an associated BD of 4.6 mmol/L. When other processes are present, which might contribute to acidosis i.e. hyperchloremia and renal failure in which BD may not be due solely to elevated blood lactate levels. When possible, a blood lactate level should probably be obtained in addition to the BD.

Summary

The ED is becoming an integral part of the chain of survival because the progression or resolution of organ dysfunction in critical illness is significant during the ED stay. The unavoidable duration of stay in ED frequently necessitates diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to attain hemodynamic stability that would otherwise be performed in the ICU. Early hemodynamic assessment using Goal directed resuscitation history, physical examination, vital signs, CVP, and other indices should be used in combination. In order to achieve definite parameters using these vital indices are yet to achieve, opening the vista of reaching that far using further multi centre trials.

Acknowledgements

This project funded by College of Medicine Research Centre, Deanship of Research, King Saud University.

References

  1. The World Health Report 2004. Health systems improving performances. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
  2. Molyneux EM, Maitland K (2005) Intravenous fluids--getting the balance right. N Engl J Med 353: 941-944.
  3. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, et al. ( 2001) Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 29: 1303-1310.
  4. Kochanek KD, Smith B (2004) National vital statistics report. In Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, editor. Deaths: preliminary data for 2002.US Department of Health and Human Services, National Vital Statistics Report; Hyattsville, MD.
  5. Strehlow MC, Emond SD, Shapiro NI, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA (2006) National study of emergency department visits for sepsis, 1992 to 2001. Ann Emerg Med 48: 326-331.
  6. Buss PW, McCabe M, Evans RJ, Davies A, Jenkins H (1993) A survey of basic resuscitation knowledge among resident paediatricians. Arch Dis Child 68: 75-78.
  7. Wang HE, Shapiro NI, Angus DC, Yealy DM (2007) National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med 35: 1928-1936.
  8. Santhanam I, Kissoon N, Kamath SR, Ranjit S, Ramesh J,et al. (2009) GAP between knowledge and skills for the implementation of the ACCM/PALS septic shock guidelines in India: Is the bridge too far? Indian J Crit Care Med 13: 54-58
  9. Ho BC, Bellomo R, McGain F, Jones D, Naka T, et al.(2006) The incidence and outcome of septic shock patients in the absence of early-goal directed therapy. Crit Care 10: R80.
  10. Jones AE, Brown MD, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, Garrett JS, et al. ( 2008) The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 36: 2734-2739.
  11. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, et al. (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. New Engl J Med 345: 1368-1377.
  12. Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Abate NL, Cowan RM, Stauss M, et al. (2006) Translating research to clinical practice: a 1-year experience with implementing early goal-directed therapy for septic shock in the emergency department. Chest 129: 225-232.
  13. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, Lahey D, Ngo L, et al. (2006) Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol. Crit Care Med 34: 1025-1032.
  14. Jones AE, Focht A, Horton JM, Kline JA, et al. (2007) Prospective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department-based early goal-directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest 132: 425-432.
  15. Micek ST, Roubinian N, Heuring T, Bode M, Williams J, et al. ( 2006) Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 34: 2707-2713.
  16. Puskarich MA, Marchick MR, Kline JA, Steuerwald MT, Jones AE ( 2009) One year mortality of patients treated with an emergency department based early goal directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock: a before and after study. Crit Care 13: R167.
  17. Birkahn RH, Gaeta TJ, Terry D, Bove JJ, Tloczkowski J (2005) Shock index in diagnosing early acute hypovolemia. Am J Emerg Med 23: 323-326.
  18. Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, Mahnken JD, Carlton E, et al. (2009) Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma 67: 1426-1430.
  19. Rady MY (1994) Triage and resuscitation of critically ill patients in the emergency department: Current concepts and practice. Eur J Emerg Med 1: 175-189.
  20. Zohair Alaseri (2010) Vital Signs, MAP, Shock Index, and Circulatory Shock. Emergency medicine reports.
  21. Kristensen SR (1994) Mechanisms of cell damage and enzyme release. Dan Med Bull 41: 423-433.
  22. Rodgers KG (1995) Cardiovascular shock. Emerg Med Clin North Am 13: 793-810.
  23. Hinshaw LB (1996) Sepsis/septic shock: Participation of the microcirculation: an abbreviated review. Crit Care Med 24: 1072-1078.
  24. Kern JW, Shoemaker WC (2002) Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 30: 1686-1692.
  25. Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, Jacobsen G, Muzzin A, et al. (2004) Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32: 1637-1642.
  26. Pinsky MR,Payen D (2005) Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care9: 566-572.
  27. Wilson M,Davis DP,Coimbra R, et al. (2003) Diagnosis and monitoring of hemorrhagic shock during the initial resuscitation of multiple trauma patients: a review.J Emerg Med24: 413-422.
  28. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, Chastre J, Hudson LD, et al. (2007) Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med 33: 575-590.
  29. Wo CC, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Bishop MH, Kram HB, et al.( 1993) Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness. Crit Care Med 21: 218-223.
  30. Rady MY, Smithline H, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E (1994) A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 24: 685-690.
  31. Thooft A, Favory R, Salgado DR, Taccone FS, Donadello K, et al (2000)Effects of changes in arterial pressure on organ perfusion during septic shock. Crit Care 15: R222.
  32. Partrick DA, Bensard DD, Janik JS, Karrer FM, et al. (2002) Is hypotension a reliable indicator of blood loss from traumatic injury in children? Am J Surg 184: 555-559.
  33. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (1993) Advanced Trauma Life Support Courses, American College of Surgeons, Chicago.
  34. Stern SA, Dronen SC, Birrer P, Wang X (1993) Effect of blood pressure on hemorrhage volume and survival in a near-fatal hemorrhage model incorporating a vascular injury. Ann Emerg Med 22: 155-163.
  35. McGee S, Abernethy WB III, David LS (1999) Is This Patient Hypovolemic? JAMA 281: 1022-1029.
  36. Victorino GP, Battistella FD, Wisner DH (2003) Does tachycardia correlate with hypotension after trauma? J Am Coll Surg 196: 679-684
  37. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, et al. (2004) ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 44: E1-E211.
  38. King RW, Plewa MC, Buderer NM, Knotts FB (1996) Shock index as a marker for significant injury in trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med 3: 1041-1045.
  39. Michard F (2005) Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 103: 419-428.
  40. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, et al.( 2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 134-138.
  41. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A (2005) Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 95: 746-755.
  42. Reinhart K, Bloos F(2005) The value of venous oximetry. Curr Opin Crit Care 11: 259-263.
  43. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE Jr, et al. (1996) The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT investigators. JAMA 276: 889-897.
  44. Reinhart K, Kuhn HJ,Hartog C, Bredle DL (2004) Continuous central venous and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill. Intensive Care Medicine 30: 1572 -1578.
  45. Chawla LS, Zia H, Gutierrez G, Katz NM, Seneff MG, et al. (2004) Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Chest 126: 1891-1896.
  46. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, Ashcroft J, Jones CM, et al. (2005) Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366: 472-477.
  47. ARDSnet (2006) Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354: 2213-2224.
  48. Rady MY, Rivers EP, Nowak RM (1996) Resuscitation of the critically ill in the ED: responses of blood pressure, heart rate, shock index, central venous oxygen saturation, and lactate. Am J Emerg Med 14: 218-225.
  49. Bracht H, Hänggi M, Jeker B, Wegmüller N, Porta F, et al.( 2007) Incidence of low central venous oxygen saturation during unplanned admissions in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit: an observational study. Crit Care 11: R2.
  50. Vincent JL,Weil MH (2006) Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 34: 1333-1337.
  51. Bellomo R,Uchino S (2003) Cardiovascular monitoring tools: use and misuse. Curr Opin Crit Care 9: 225-229.
  52. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, et al (2003) Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 124: 1900-1908
  53. Weil MH, Nakagawa Y, Tang W, Sato Y, Ercoli F, et al.(1999) Sublingual capnometry: a new noninvasive measurement for diagnosis and quantitation of severity of circulatory shock. Crit Care Med27: 1225-1229
  54. Marik PE,Bankov A (2003) Sublingual capnometry versus traditional markers of tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients.Crit Care Med 31: 818-822.
  55. Marik PE (2001) Sublingual capnography: a clinical validation study. Chest 120: 923-927.
  56. Ahrens T, Schallom L, Bettorf K, Ellner S, Hurt G, et al. (2001) End-tidal carbon dioxide measurements as a prognostic indicator of outcome in cardiac arrest. Am J Crit Care 10: 391-398.
  57. Sanders AB, Kern KB, Otto CW, Milander MM, Ewy GA, et al. (1989) End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A prognostic indicator for survival. JAMA 262: 1347-1351.
  58. Yosefy C, Hay E, Nasri Y, Magen E, Reisin L (2004) Magenet al.End tidal carbon dioxide as a predictor of the arterial PCO2 in the emergency department setting. Emerg Med J 21: 557-559.
  59. Tatevossian RG, Wo CC, Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Shoemaker WC (2000) Transcutaneous oxygen and CO2 as early warning of tissue hypoxia and hemodynamic shock in critically ill emergency patients. Crit Care Med 28: 2248-2253.
  60. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, Weis FC, Kilger E, et al. (2003) Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 31: 1399-1404.
  61. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C (2006) Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 34: 1402-1407.
  62. Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, Richard C, Perrotin D, et al. (2002) Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 121: 1245-1252.
  63. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Runge I, Benzekri-Lefèvre D, Legras A, et al. (2010) Central venous pressure measurements improve the accuracy of leg raising-induced change in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 36: 940-948.
  64. Cain SM (1965) Appearance of excess lactate in anesthetized dogs during anemic and hypoxic hypoxia. Am J Physiol 209: 604-610.
  65. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Mulder PG, Rommes JH, Schieveld SJ, et al. (2008) The prognostic value of blood lactate levels relative to that of vital signs in the pre-hospital setting: a pilot study. Crit Care 12: R160.
  66. Smith I, Kumar P, Molloy S, Rhodes A, Newman PJ, et al. (2001) Base excess and lactate as prognostic indicators for patients admitted to intensive care. Intensive Care Med 27: 74-83.
  67. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, Nathanson LA, Lisbon A, et al. (2005) Serum lactate as a predictor of mortality in emergency department patients with infection. Ann Emerg Med 45: 524-528.
  68. Brinkert W, Rommes JH, Bakker J (1999) Lactate measurements in critically ill patients with a hand-held analyser. Intensive Care Med 25: 966-969.
  69. Fauchère JC, Bauschatz AS, Arlettaz R, Zimmermann-Bär U, Bucher HU (2002) Agreement between capillary and arterial lactate in the newborn. Acta Paediatr 91: 78-81.
  70. Scalea TM, Maltz S, Yelon J, Trooskin SZ, Duncan AO, et al. (1994) Resuscitation of multiple trauma and head injury: role of crystalloid fluids and inotropes. Crit Care Med. 22: 1610-1615.
  71. Jeng JC, Lee K, Jablonski K, Jordan MH (1997) Serum lactate and base deficit suggest inadequate resuscitation of patients with burn injuries: application of a point-of-care laboratory instrument. J Burn Care Rehabil 18: 402-405.
  72. Howell MD, Donnino M, Clardy P, Talmor D, Shapiro NI (2007) Occult hypoperfusion and mortality in patients with suspected infection. Intensive Care Med 33: 1892-1899.
  73. Smith I, Kumar P, Molloy S, Rhodes A, Newman PJ, et al. (2001) Base excess and lactate as prognostic indicators for patients admitted to intensive care. Intensive Care Med 27: 74-83.
  74. Husain FA, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Elliott DC (2003) Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality and morbidity. Am J Surg 185: 485-491.
  75. McNelis J, Marini CP, Jurkiewicz A, Szomstein S, Simms HH, et al. (2001) Prolonged lactate clearance is associated with increased mortality in the surgical intensive care unit. Am J Surg 182: 481-485.
  76. Jeng JC,Jablonski K,Bridgeman A, Jordan MH (2002) Serum lactate, not base deficit, rapidly predicts survival after major burns. Burns 28: 161-166.
  77. Middleton P, Kelly AM, Brown J, Robertson M (2006) Agreement between arterial and central venous values for pH, bicarbonate, base excess, and lactate. Emerg Med J 23: 622-624.
  78. Bakker J, Coffernils M, Leon M, Gris P, Vincent JL (1991) Blood lactate levels are superior to oxygen-derived variables in predicting outcome in human septic shock. Chest 99: 956-962.
  79. Weil MH, Afifi AA (1970) Experimental and clinical studies on lactate and pyruvate as indicators of the severity of acute circulatory failure (shock). Circulation 41: 989-1001.
  80. Vitek V, Cowley RA (1971) Blood lactate in the prognosis of various forms of shock. Ann Surg 173: 308-313.
  81. Cowan BN, Burns HJ, Boyle P, Ledingham IM (1984) The relative prognostic value of lactate and haemodynamic measurements in early shock. Anaesthesia 39: 750-755.
  82. Grzybowski M (1996) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and lactic acidosis in the detection of critical illness among patients presenting to the emergency department. Chest 110: 145.
  83. Moore RB, Shapiro NI, Wolfe RE, Smith ES et al. (2001)The Value of SIRS Criteria in ED Patients with Presumed Infection in Predicting Mortality. Acad Emerg Med 8: 477.
  84. Aduen J, Bernstein WK, Khastgir T, Miller J, Kerzner R, et al. (1994) The use and clinical importance of a substrate-specific electrode for rapid determination of blood lactate concentrations. JAMA 272: 1678-1685.
  85. Wilson M, Davis DP, Coimbra R (2003) Diagnosis and monitoring of hemorrhagic shock during the initial resuscitation of multiple trauma patients: a review. J Emerg Med 24: 413-422.
  86. Bernardin G, Pradier C, Tiger F, Deloffre P, Mattei M (1996) Blood pressure and arterial lactate level are early indicators of short-term survival in human septic shock. Intensive Care Med 22: 17-25
  87. Broder G, Weil MH (1964) Excess lactate: an index of reversibility of shock in human patients. Science 143: 1457-1459
  88. Bakker J, Coffernils M, Leon M, Gris P, Vincent JL (1991) Blood lactate levels are superior to oxygen-derived variables in predicting outcome in human septic shock. Chest 99: 956-962.
  89. Dunham CM, Siegel JH, Weireter L, Fabian M, Goodarzi S, et al. (1999) Oxygen debt and metabolic acidemia as quantitative predictors of mortality and the severity of the ischemic insult in hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 19: 231-243
  90. Manikis P, Jankowski S, Zhang H, Kahn RJ, Vincent JL (1995) Correlation of serial blood lactate levels to organ failure and mortality after trauma. Am J Emerg Med 13: 619-622.
  91. Bakker J, Gris P, Coffernils M, Kahn RJ, Vincent JL (1996) Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following septic shock. Am J Surg 171: 221-226.
  92. Vincent JL, Dufaye P, Berré J, Leeman M, Degaute JP, et al. (1983) Serial lactate determinations during circulatory shock. Crit Care Med 11: 449-451.
  93. Abramson D, Scalea TM, Hitchcock R, Trooskin SZ, Henry SM, et al. (1993)Lactate clearance and survival following injury. J Trauma 35: 584-588.
  94. James JH, Luchette FA, McCarter FD, Fischer JE (1999) Lactate is an unreliable indicator of tissue hypoxia in injury or sepsis. Lancet 354: 505-508.
  95. Suistomaa M, Ruokonen E, Kari A, Takala J (2000) Time-pattern of lactate and lactate to pyruvate ratio in the first 24 hours of intensive care emergency admissions. Shock 14: 8-12.
  96. Tisherman SA, Barie P, Bokhari F, Bonadies J, Daley B, et al. (2004) Clinical practice guideline: endpoints of resuscitation. J Trauma 57: 898-912.
  97. Boyd O, Grounds RM, Bennett ED (1993) A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA 270: 2699-2707.
  98. Comments in: JAMA 1994.4; 271:1317-1321. Comment in: ACP J Club 1994 May-Jun; 120: 76.
  99. Kruse JA, Zaidi SA, Carlson RW (1987) Significance of blood lactate levels in critically ill patients with liver disease. Am J Med 83: 77-82.
  100. Rutherford EJ, Morris JA Jr, Reed GW, Hall KS (1992)Base deficit stratifies mortality and determines therapy. J Trauma 33: 417-423.
  101. Davis JW, Parks SN, Kaups KL, Gladen HE, O'Donnell-Nicol S (1996) Admission base deficit predicts transfusion requirements and risk of complications. J Trauma 41: 769-774.
  102. Mikulaschek A, Henry SM, Donovan R, Scalea TM (1996) Serum lactate is not predicted by anion gap or base excess after trauma resuscitation. J Trauma 40: 218-222.
  103. Iberti TJ, Leibowitz AB, Papadakos PJ, Fischer EP (1990) Low sensitivity of the anion gap as a screen to detect hyperlactatemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 18: 275-277.
  104. Kang YR, Um SW, Koh WJ, Suh GY, Chung MP, et al. (2010) Initial Lactate Level and Mortality in Septic Shock Patients With Hepatic Dysfunction. Anaesth Intensive Care 39: 862-867.
Citation: Al Aseri (2012) Vital Indices to be used in Resuscitation of Patients with Shock in the Emergency Department Setting. Emergency Medicine 2:108.

Copyright: © 2012 Al Aseri Z. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top