GET THE APP

Transcriptomics Data Integration Reveals Jak-STAT as a Common Pat
Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Open Access

ISSN: 0974-276X

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2012) Volume 5, Issue 4

Transcriptomics Data Integration Reveals Jak-STAT as a Common Pathway Affected by Pathogenic Intracellular Bacteria in Natural Reservoir Hosts

Ruth C. Galindo1 and José De La Fuente1,2*
1Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain
2Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*Corresponding Author: José De La Fuente, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos, Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda De Toledo S/n, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain, Tel: 34-926295450, Fax: 34-926295451

Abstract

The study of the host-pathogen interface in natural reservoir hosts is essential to identify host-cell mechanisms affected by bacterial infection and persistence. Herein we used the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) to integrate transcriptomics data and find common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria of the genera Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium during infection and persistence in two natural reservoir hosts, wild boar and sheep. The results showed that the upregulation of host innate immune pro-inflammatory genes and signaling pathways constitutes a general antibacterial mechanism in response to intracellular bacteria. Pathway focused analysis revealed a role for the Jak-STAT pathway during bacterial intracellular infection, a fact reported before in Mycobacterium infected cells but not during Brucella spp. and A. phagocytophilum infection. A clear activation of the Jak-STAT pathway was observed in A. phagocytophilum infected wild boar and sheep when compared to uninfected controls. Brucella spp. infection resulted in a balanced regulation of the Jak-STAT signaling and M. bovis infection of wild boar clearly produced a downregulation of some of the Jak-STAT effectors such as IL5 and TKY2. These results suggested that mycobacteria and brucellae induce host innate immune responses while manipulating adaptive immunity to circumvent host-cell defenses and establish infection. In contrast, A. phagocytophilum infection induces both innate and adaptive immunity, those suggesting that this pathogen uses other mechanisms to circumvent host-cell defenses by downregulating other adaptive immune genes and delaying the apoptotic death of neutrophils through activation of the Jak-STAT pathway among other mechanisms.

Keywords: Transcriptomics; Anaplasma; Mycobacterium; Brucella; Systems biology

Introduction

Pathogenic bacteria have to interact with host cells and reprogram the complex molecular and cellular networks of these cells to allow bacterial infection, replication and spread, while countering hostdefense mechanisms [1,2]. This process is likely to involve genes from both pathogens and hosts, all of which are probably subject to complex regulation [1-3].

Molecular biology and in particular recent advances in genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics have allowed the characterization of host-pathogen interactions [2,3]. However, these studies have focused on the response of particular hosts to one or multiple pathogens, mostly using in vitro systems (see for example, [2]). Moving from in vitro studies in cultured cells to relevant animal disease models and natural reservoir hosts is crucial for understanding host-pathogen interactions, yet such studies are often neglected because cell culture-based systems are easier to manipulate. However, the study of the host-pathogen interface in natural reservoir hosts infected with different pathogens is now possible and essential to identify host-cell mechanisms affected by bacterial infection and persistence, which may be different from those identified in vitro [3,4].

Herein, the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was used to integrate transcriptomics data and find common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria of the genera Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium during infection and persistence in two natural reservoir hosts, wild boar (Sus scrofa) and sheep (Ovis aries).

Materials and Methods

Transcriptomics data

Transcriptomics data was obtained from previously published studies on infected and uninfected matching control animals using microarray hybridization and real-time RT-PCR in wild boar infected with Mycobacterium bovis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Brucella suis [4-6] (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) platform accession and series numbers GPL3533, GPL3533, GSE15766, GSE17492) and in sheep infected with A. phagocytophilum and Brucella ovis [7-9] (GPL4456, GPL6954, GSE11928 and GSE10286). In these studies, the infection with M. bovis, A. phagocytophilum, B. ovis or B. suis strains was characterized in experimentally or naturally infected animals during acute or chronic infection (Table 1).

Strain Origin Host Tissue examined Infection type Characterization of infection
A. phagocytophilum Isolated from infected sheep in the Basque Country, Spain [30] (Genbank accession number EU436164) Sheep PBMC Experimental acute infection Infection was confirmed by microscopic examination of stained blood smears and msp4 PCR [7,30]
Isolated from infected Eurasian wild boar hunter-killed in Slovenia, genotipically identical to strains   isolated from humans, dogs andI. ricinus ticks [31] (Genbank accession numbers AY055469, AF033101 and EU246961) Wild boar PBMC Natural chronic infection Infection was confirmed by 16S rDNA and groESLPCRs and sequence analysis [31]
B. ovis R virulent PA strain Provided by Dr. J.M. Verger. Unite´ d’Infectiologie Animale et Sante´ Publique, INRA, Nouzilly, France [32,33] Sheep PBMC Experimental acute infection Infection was confirmed at necropsy by bacterial culture, morphology, Gram staining, oxidase and urease tests, CO2 requirements and phage typing [8,34]
B. suis biovar 2 Isolated from infected Eurasian wild boar in Navarra, Spain [34,35] Wild boar Spleen Natural chronic infection Infection was confirmed by bacterial culture and seroconversion [5,36]
M. bovis Isolated from infected Eurasian wild boar in Southwestern Spain [3] Wild boar Spleen Natural chronic infection Infection was confirmed at necropsy by pathology, bacterial culture and spoligotyping [3,4]

Table 1: Bacterial strains and experimental animals.

Transcriptomics data integration and analysis

Microarray data from all host-pathogen interactions were filtered to select significant (P < 0.05) differentially expressed genes with an infected/uninfected fold change (FC) ≥ 1.2. These genes were analyzed using DAVID V6.7 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) [10,11] to select the highest enrichment score (ES), which is the geometric mean of all enrichment P values (EASE scores) for each gene ontology (GO) term [11] and clustering for host cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by bacterial infection in these hosts and then identify among them those factors common to all host-bacteria interactions (Figure 1). The significance of GO term enrichment was determined with a modified Fisher’s exact test (EASE score; P ≤ 0.001) and a FC > 2 for overrepresented terms. Enrichment P-values were globally corrected to control family-wide false discovery rates at Benjamini ≤ 0.0004. ES > 2 was used to rank GO term enrichment.

proteomics-bioinformatics-pipeline-annotation-visualization

Figure 1: Analysis pipeline. The analysis used the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) V 6.7 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) to integrate data and find common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria of the genera Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium during infection in natural reservoir hosts, wild boar and sheep. Abbreviations: ES, enrichment score; FC, fold change; Ben, Benjamini; WBA, wild boar infected with A. phagocytophilum; WB-B, wild boar infected with B. suis; WB-M, wild boar infected with M. bovis; S-A, sheep infected with A. phagocytophilum; S-B, sheep infected with B. ovis.

Real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR

Differential expression of genes in common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR using primers designed based on sequences available in the GenBank (Table 2). The real-time RT-PCR was performed on pooled RNA samples from infected and uninfected wild boar and sheep (wild boar infected with A. phagocytophilum, N=2; wild boar infected with Brucella spp., N=3; wild boar infected with M. bovis, N=6; sheep infected with A. phagocytophilum, N=2; sheep infected with Brucella spp, N=6; wild boar uninfected controls, N=12; sheep uninfected controls, N=5) with gene specific primers using the iScript One-Step RT-PCR Kit with SYBR Green and the iQ5 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following manufacturer's recommendations. The mRNA levels were normalized against cyclophlilyn and beta-actin using the genNorm method (ddCT method as implemented by Bio-Rad iQ5 Standard Edition, Version 2.0) [12]. In all cases, the mean of triplicate values was used and data from infected and uninfected animals were compared using the Student`s t-test (P=0.05). Correlation analysis between microarray and RT-PCR results was conducted in Excel by calculating (a) percent of values with similar tendency (i.e. no variation, upregulated or downregulated) and (b) correlation coefficients (R2) between all values independently of the statistical analysis for RT-PCR results which were affected by the low number of samples used in the analysis.

GenBank accession number1 Gene symbol Upstream/downstream primer sequences (5´-3´)
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) Sheep/Cattle (Ovis aries/Bos taurus)
NM_213844.2/ NM_001144097.1 CRP Ss-CRPF: GTGTTGTCACCGGAGGAGAT
Ss-CRPR: CCAGAGACAAGGGGAACGTA
Oa-CRPF: AGCATGTCCCGTACCAAAAG
Oa-CRPR:  TTTTGCCTTGACAGTTGCAG
NM_214155.2/ NM_001009417.1 CD247 Ss-CD247F: TGGGGAAGGACAAGATGAAG
Ss-CD247R: TCTCTCAGGAACAGGGCAGT
Bt-CD247F: TTGTCACTGCCCTGTTTCTG
Bt-CD247R: ACTTCGTGGGGGTTCTTCTT
NM_213775.2/
NM_001009382.1
CD3D Ss-CD3DF: TCTCTCAGGAACAGGGCAGT
Ss-CD3DR: AGGGAAGCGAAGAAAGAAGG
Oa-CD3DF: TTGAGGACCCAAGAGGAATG
Oa-CD3DR: GTCTCATGTCCAGCAAAGCA
NM_001001908.1/
NM_001129902.1
CD4 Ss-CD4F: GCTGGGGAACCAGAGTATGA
Ss-CDFR: AGAACCCAGCGAGAAACAGA
Oa-CD4F: AAGCTCGAGGTGGAACTGAA
Oa-CD4R: CGTCCAGGTACCACTGTCCT
NM_213774.1/ NM_001034735.1 CD74 Ss-CD74F: CCTGCTCCTGAAGTCTGACC
Ss-CD74R: GTGTCTCCTCCAGCGAGTTC
Bt-CD74F: TTGAGGGTCCACCAAAAGAC
Bt-CD74R: GCTGATGGAGAGGCAGAGTC
NM_214269.2/ NM_174375.2 KITLG Ss-KITLGF: GATGCCTTCAAGGATTTGGA
Ss-KITLGR: ATGGAATCTGAGGCCTTCCT
Bt-KITLGF: CGTCCACACTCAAGGGATCT
Bt-KITLGR: TTCCACCATCTCGCTTATCC
NM_214354.1/ NM_001076269.1 CALCR Ss-CALCRF: TGGAATCTCCAATCCAGGAG
Ss-CALCRR: AGCACCAGCGTGTAAGTGTG
Bt-CALCRF: CCCATCCTGAGAGCAACATT
Bt-CALCRR: AACACGCATGAAAATCACCA
XM_001924460.1/ NM_001100293.1 CCR4 Ss-CCR4F: TCACAGGAATGGCCTTTTTC
Ss-CCR4R: GACTGCTTGTTGGCTTCCTC
Bt-CCR4F: TGTTCACTGCTGCCTCAATC
Bt-CCR4R: TAAGATGAGCTGGGGGTGTC
NM_001009580.1/ NM_001113174.1 CXCL12 Ss-CXCL12F: CAGTGTCCCCAGTGTGTCAG
Ss-CXCL12R: CTCTCAAAGAATCGGCAAGG
Bt-CCXCL12F: GAGATCATGTCTCCGCCTTC
Bt-CCXCL12R: GAAACTGTGCTGTGGCTTCA
U61139.1/
L07939.1
CSF2 Ss-CSF2F: TTACCATCCCCTTTGACTGC
Ss-CSF2R: AGTCTGTGCCCCATTACAGC
Oa-CSFF: CGTCCAGGTACCACTGTCCT
Oa-CSFR: GTTGGTCTAGGCAGCTCGTC
NM_001003924 / NM_001014945 C1QA Ss-C1QAF: CTTCCAGGTGGTGTCCAAGT
Ss-C1QAR: TGGATCCAGACCTTGTCTCC
Bt-C1QAF: GCATCTTCAGTGGCTTCCTC
Bt-C1QAR: ACTTGGTAGGGCAGAGCAGA
AY349420.1/ NM_001046599 C1qB Ss-C1QBF: GCGAGTCCGGAGACTACAAG
Ss-C1QBR: ATGAGGTTCACGCACAGGTT
Bt-C1QBF: CTGCGACTACGTCCAGAACA
Bt-C1QBR: GTTGGTGTTGGGGAGAAAGA
NM_001001646.1/ NM_001166616.1 C5 Ss-C5F: GCATGTCCCAGACCAAACTT
Ss-C5R: ACGGCTTCTCCAGCTTTGTA
Bt-C5F: TGCTGAGAGAGACGCTGAAA
Bt-C5R: TCAATCCAGGTCGAGGAATC
NM_214282.1/ NM_001045966.1 C7 SsC7F: TCAAGTGCCTCCTCTCCTGT
SsC7R: GCTGATGCACTGACCTGAAA
Bt-C7F: GGCGGTCAATTGCTGTTTAT
Bt-CTR: GGTCTGCTTTCTGCATCCTC
NM_213975.1/ NM_001009786.1 FTH1 Ss-FTH1F: TGCTTCAACAGTGCTTGGAC
Ss-FTH1R: TCTTCAAAGCCACATCATCG
Oa-FTH1F: CGCTACTGGAACTGCACAAA
Oa-FTH1R: CAGGGTGTGCTTGTCAAAGA
NM_001004027.1/
NM_001014912.1
HMOX1 Ss-HMOX1F: ATGTGAATGCAACCCTGTGA
Ss-HMOX1R: GTGCTCTTGGTTGGGAAAGA
Bt-HMOX1F: ACTCACCCCTTCCTGTTCCT
Bt-HMOX1R: CACAAAGCTGCTCCAACAAA
NM_001123124.1/ NM_174339.3 HIF1A Ss-HIF1AF: TTACAGCAGCCAGATGATCG
Ss-HIF1AR: TGGTCAGCTGTGGTAATCCA
Bt-HIF1AF: TCAGCTATTTGCGTGTGAGG
Bt.HIF1AR: TCGTGGTCACATGGATGAGT
NM_214055.1/ NM_001009465.2 IL1B Ss-IL1BF: CAGCCATGGCCATAGTACCT
Ss-IL1BR: CCACGATGACAGACACCATC
Oa-IL1BF: CGAACATGTCTTCCGTGATG
Oa-IL1BR: GAAGCTCATGCAGAACACCA
AY552750.1 / NM_001009734.1 IL15 Ss-IL15F: TTGTCCTGTGTGTTCGGTGT
Ss-IL15R: GCAAAGCCTTTTGAGTGAGC
Oa-IL15F: TTTGGGCTGTATCAGTGCAG
Oa-IL15R: AATAACGCGTAGCTCGAGGA
NM_214415.1/ NM_198832.1 IL21 Ss-IL21F: CGGGGAACATGGAGAAAATA
Ss-IL21R: CAGCAATTCAGGGTCCAAGT
Bt-IL21F: CGGGGAACATGGAGAGAATA
Bt-IL21R: GGCAGAAATTCAGGATCCAA
BU946820.1/
NM_001195219.1
IL25 Ss-IL25F: CTCACCTGCGTGTCACCTT
Ss-IL25R: AATATGGCATGGCCTACTCG
Oa-IL25F: GCCCCCTGGAGATATGAGTT
Oa-IL25R: AGAAAACGGTCTGGTTGTGG
NM_214340.1/ NM_001075142.1 IL4R Ss-IL4RF: CCCATCTGCCTATCCGACTA
Ss-IL4RR: TGACAATGCTCTCCATCAGC
Bt-IL4F: CTGAGCCCAGAGTCAAGTCC
Bt-IL4R: CAGCTGTGGGTCTGAGTCAA
NM_214205.1/ NM_001009783.1 IL5 Ss-IL5F: TGGCAGAGACCTTGACACTG
Ss-IL5R: CCCTCGTGCAGTTTGATTCT
Oa-IL5F: AAAGGCAAACGCTGAACATT Oa-IL5R: CAGAGTTTGATGCGTGGAGA
M80258.1/ NM_001009392.1 IL6 Ss-IL6F: CACCAGGAACGAAAGAGAGC
Ss-IL6R: GTTTTGTCCGGAGAGGTGAA
Oa-IL6F: TGGAGGAAAAAGATGGATGC
Oa-IL6R: TGCATCTTCTCCAGCATGTC
NM_001166043.1/ EI184569.1 IL9 Ss-IL9F: TATGTCTGCCCATTCCTTCC
Ss-IL9R: CATGGCTGTTCACAGGAAAA
Oa-IL9F: CACCACCACACTTTTGCATC
Oa-IL9R: ACCCACCCAGAGAGGAATCT
NM_001077213.2/NM_001078655.1 MIF Ss-MIFF: GAACCGTTCCTACAGCAAGC
SS-MIFR: CCGAGAGCAAAGGAGTCTTG
Oa-MIFF: CTCCTCTCCGAGCTCACG
Oa-MIFR: TGTAGATCCTGTCCGGGCTA
NM_001009578.1/ NM_001046477.1 MSN Ss-MSNF: TGACCCCACACACTCCTACA
Ss-MSNR: CCATAGTGGGCCATCTGTCT
Bt-MSNF: AAGGAGAGTGAGGCTGTGGA
Bt-MSNR: CCCATTCTCATCCTGCTCAT
NM_214379.1/ NM_001100921.1 PPARG Ss-PPARGF: GCCCTTCACCACTGTTGATT
Ss-PPARGR: GAGTTGGAAGGCTCTTCGTG
Oa-PPARGF: CCCTGGCAAAGCATTTGTAT
Oa-PPARGR: ACTGACACCCCTGGAAGATG
AF527990.2/ ES414801.1 PSME1 Ss-PSME1F: AAGAAGGGGGAAGATGAGGA
Ss-PSME1R: CTTCTCCTGGACAGCCACTC
Oa-PSMEF: AAGCCAAGGTGGATGTGTTC
Oa-PSMER: AGGCACTGGGATGTCCAAT
AF139837.1/ XM_002693929.1 RGS1 Ss-RGS1F: GAGTCCGATCTTTTGCATCG
Ss-RGS1R: TGATTTTCTGGGCTTCATCA
Bt-RGS1F: GTGGTCTGAATCCCTGGAAA
Bt-RGS1R: GATTCTCGAGTGCGGAAGTC
NM_001012299.1/ NM_174176.2 SCG2 Ss-SCG2F: CATGCGTTTCCCTCCTATGT
Ss-SCG2R: TCTCACGCTTCTGGTTGTTG
Bt-SCG2F: ACTGGAGAGAAGCCAGTGGA
Bt-SCG2R: TATGGAGGCTTTGGATTTGC
AB258452.1/ GQ175957.1 TLR8 Ss-TLR8F: TGTCATTGCAGAGTGCAACA
Ss-TLR8R: GAGAAACGCCCCATCTGTAA
Oa-TLR8F: CCTTGCAGAGGCTAATGGAG
Oa-TLR8R: CTCTGCCAAAACAAGCCTTC
L43124.1/ NM_174484.1 VCAM1 Ss-VCAMF: ATCCAAGCTGCTCCAAAAGA
Ss-VCAMR: GGCCCTGTGGATGGTATATG
Bt-VCAMF: GAACCGACAGCTCCTTTCTG
BT-VCAMR: TCCCTGACATCACAGGTCAA
NM_001031797.1/ NM_001123003.1 FADD Ss-FADDF: AGTATCCCCGAAACCTGACC
Ss-FADDR: CAGGAAATGAGGGACACAGG
Oa-FADDF: TGCAGATATTGCTTGGCTTG
Oa-FADDR: CAGCATTCATCTCCCCAACT
NM_001014971.1 COL5A1 Ss-COL5F: GGAGATCGAGCAGATGAAGC
Ss-COL5R: GCCCCTTCGGACTTCTTATC
Sequence not available for O. aries or B. taurus
U83916.1/ NM_001164714.1 CTGF Ss-CTGFF: CATGGCCTAAAGCCAGAGAG
Ss-CTGFR: TGGCACACGATTTTGAATGT
Oa-CTGFF: CCTGGTCCAGACCACAGAGT
Oa-CTGFR: GCAGCCAGAGAGCTCAAACT
NM_001129953.1/ U47636.1 DMP1 Ss-DMP1F: CACTGAATCCGAAGAGCACA
Ss-DMP1R: CCTGGATTGTGTGGTGTCAG
Oa-DMP1F: AGCCCAGAGTCCACTGAAGA
Oa-DMP1R: GTTTGTTGTGGTACGCATCG
AJ577089.1/ NM_001009769.1 FGF2 Ss-FGF2F: AGCGACCCTCACATCAAACT
Ss-FGG2R: TCGTTTCAGTGCCACATACC
Oa-FGF2F: GTGCAAACCGTTACCTTGCT
Oa-FGF2R: ACTGCCCAGTTCGTTTCAGT
AF052657.1/ NM_001009235.1 FGF7 Ss-FGF7F: TTTGCTGAACCCAATTCCTC
Ss-FGF7R: CAGGAACCCCCTTTTGATTT
Oa-FGF7F: ATGAACACCCGGAGCACTAT
Oa-FGF7R: GGGCTGGAACAGTTCACATT
NM_001103212.1/ NM_176669.3 STC1 Ss-STC1F: GCTCTACTTTCCAGCGGATG
Ss-STC1R: TCTTCGTCACATTCCAGCAG
Bt-STC1F: AGCTGAACGTGTGCAGTGTC
Bt-STC1R: CGTCTGCAGGATGTGAAAGA
NM_214198.1/ AY656798.1 TGFB3 Ss-TGFB3F: GATGAGCACATAGCCAAGCA
Ss-TGFB3R: AGGTGTGACACGGACAATGA
Oa-TGFB3F: AGCGGTATATCGATGGCAAG
Oa-TGFB3R: ATTGGGCTGAAAGGTGTGAC
NM_001114670.1/NM_001191344.1 TKY2 Ss-TKY2F: ACTGCTATGACCCGACCAAC
Ss-TKY2R: TGACTTCTCGCCTTGGTCTT
Oa-FLT4F: AGCTAGCCACTCCTGCCATA
Oa-FLT4R: TCTGTGTCAGCATCCGTCTC
NM_214292.1/ AY029232.1 EPOR Ss-EPORF: CTACCAGCTTGAGGGTGAGC
Ss-EPORR: CCACTTCGTTGATGTGGATG
Oa-EPORF: GTTGGTCTAGGCAGCTCGTC
Oa-EPORR: TACTCAAAGCTGGCAGCAGA
DQ450679.1/ XM_002692067.1 IL15RA Ss-IL15F: TTGTCCTGTGTGTTCGGTGT
Ss-IL15R: GCAAAGCCTTTTGAGTGAGC
Bt-IL15RAF: AGGCTCCGGAACACACATAC
Bt-IL15RAR: CACACTCTCCATGCTCTCCA
AY008846/
AJ865374.1
Cyclophilin SsCYCLOPHILINL: AGCACTGGGGAGAAAGGATT
SsCYCLOPHILINR: CTTGGCAGTGCAAATGAAAA
Oa-CyclophBF: CTTGGCTAGACGGCAAACAT
Oa-CyclophBR: GCTTCTCCACCTCGATCTTG
DQ845171/
U39357
Beta-actin SusBetActin-L: GACATCCGCAAGGACCTCTA
SusBetActin-R: ACACGGAGTACTTGCGCTCT
ACTOVI5: CTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTTCCT ACTOVI3:GGGCAGTGATCTCTTTCTGC

1GenBank accession numbers are shown for wild boar/sheep-cattle sequences.

Table 2: Primer sets used for analysis of differential gene expression by real-time RT-PCR.

Results and Discussion

The analysis conducted here focused on wild boar infected with M. bovis, A. phagocytophilum and B. suis [4-6] and sheep infected with A. phagocytophilum and B. ovis [7-9]. These pathogens represent intracellular bacteria that infect and replicate within host immune cells and were selected because of their impact as zoonotic pathogens in many regions of the world.

An analysis pipeline was developed using DAVID to integrate data and find common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria of the genera Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium during infection and persistence in two natural reservoir hosts, Eurasian wild boar and sheep (Figure 1). Because transcriptomics data were obtained from different experiments with tissue samples collected at different infection times and conditions [4-9] (Table 1), differences between various hostpathogen interactions could be explained by different factors. These factors include differences in the transcriptomics methods employed (microarray and data analysis platforms), experimental conditions (natural or experimental infections), host tissues used for RNA extraction (peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) or spleen) and individual variability of both pathogens and hosts. However, we hypothesized that statistically significant common factors emerging despite all these differences, have a particular relevance in identifying host-pathogen interactions of different pathogenic intracellular bacteria in different hosts, thus allowing the identification of common mechanisms that may be used for infection characterization, control and prevention. Therefore, the analysis focused on common mechanisms affected by these bacteria in all host-pathogen interactions.

Common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium infection in wild boar and sheep

The results showed that it is possible to integrate data from different trascriptomics experiments to find common mechanisms affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria in natural reservoir hosts. Common host-cell biological processes affected by Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium infection in wild boar and sheep included regulation of immune system and immune system with 33 genes represented (Tables 3 and 4). The common host-cell molecular functions affected included 28 genes with receptor binding, cytokine activity and growth factor activity (Tables 3 and 4). The common host-cell pathways affected by these bacteria were cytokine-receptor interaction, hematopoietic cell lineage and Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (Jak-STAT) signaling pathway (Table 3). A good correlation was obtained between microarray and RT-PCR results for genes in common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria (Table 4). Correlation between microarray and RT-PCR results was 0.36 (R2=0.74), 0.55 (R2=0.78) and 0.77 (R2=0.81) for wild boar infected with A. phagocytophilum, B. suis and M. bovis, respectively, and 0.64 (R2=0.79) and 0.70 (R2=0.80) for sheep infected with A. phagocytophilum and B. ovis, respectively.

Term Count1 P value2 Fold change3 Benjamini4
Biological process (ES5=9.68)
Regulation of immune system 21 1.5E-14 9.7 2.2E-11
Immune system 30 2.1E-14 5.4 1.6E-11
Molecular function (ES=10.27)
Receptor binding 28 6.4E-15 6.2 1.8E-12
Cytokine activity 12 3.4E-09 12.0 4.7E-07
Growth factor activity 11 7.3E-09 13.0 5.1E-07
Pathway (ES=3.70)
Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction 16 6.0E-08 5.5 3.8E-06
Hematopoietic cell lineage 9 3.1E-06 9.5 9.8E-05
Jak-STAT signaling pathway 10 3.4E-05 5.9 4.4E-04

1Indicates the number of genes involved in individual GO terms. 2Defines the significance of a GO term enrichment with a modified Fisher’s exact test (EASE score), denoting if the term is over or under represented (if P ≤ 0.05, then terms are overrepresented). 3Statistical threshold for GO term selection (FC > 2). 4To globally correct enrichment P-values to control family-wide false discovery rate at Benjamini ≤ 0.0004. 5Enrichment score (ES) was used to rank overall importance (enrichment) of GO terms.

Table 3: Common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria.

Gene symbol Gene description Host-bacteria interaction
WB-A WB-B WB-M S-A S-B
CRP C-reactive protein, pentraxin-related 1.6 (ns) ns (ns) -2.0 (-3.3 ± 0.01) ns (ns) ns (ns)
CD247 CD247 molecule 1.6 (ns) -2.2 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
CD3D CD3d molecule, delta (CD3-TCR complex) ns (ns) ns (ns) 2.1 (ns) -2.2 (ns) ns (ns)
CD4 CD4 molecule 1.4 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.3 (ns) ns (ns)
CD74 CD74 molecule, major histocompatibility complex. ns (ns) -4.1 (ns) -3.3 (-5.3 ± 0.2) ns (ns) ns (ns)
KITLG KIT ligand 3.2 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) -1.2 (ns) ns (ns)
CALCR Calcitonin receptor 5.3 (ns) 3.7 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
CCR4 Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 4 ns (1.9±0.02) ns (ns) -2.3 (-8.1±0.05) -1.4 (ns) 3.0 (ns)
CXCL12 Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12 (stromal cell-derived factor 1) 1.4 (ns) -4.8 (ns) -9.8 (-2.5±0.02) -2.7 (-4.5±2E-3) ns (-11.1±8E-6)
CSF2 Colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte-macrophage) 1.4 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.6 (6.1±4E-4) ns (-4.2±4.5-6)
C1QA Complement component 1, q subcomponent, A chain 1.3 (ns) -2.8 (ns) ns (-3.7 ± 0.2) ns (ns) ns (ns)
C1qB Complement component 1, q subcomponent, B chain 1.3 (ns) -3.9 (ns) -9.0 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
C5 Complement component 5 1.5 (ns) ns ns ns ns 1.3 (8.0±4E-4) ns (-10.0±2E-6)
C7 Complement component 7 2.5 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.3 (ns) ns (ns)
FTH1 Ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1 ns (ns) -3.6 (ns) -4.1 (-2.5±0.7) ns (ns) ns (ns)
HMOX1 Heme oxygenase (decycling) 1 ns (ns) -2.5 (ns) -1.7 (-2.5±0.1) ns (ns) ns (ns)
HIF1A Hypoxia inducible factor 1, alpha subunit (basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor) 1.3 (ns) -2.0 (-3.0±0.02) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
IL1B Interleukin 1, Beta ns (ns) 2.9 (ns) ns (ns) 1.3 (2.3±3E-4) 2.1 (1.4±5E-5)
IL15 Interleukin 15 ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.2 (ns) 2.7 (ns)
IL21 Interleukin 21 1.3 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.2 (ns) ns (ns)
IL25 Interleukin 25 ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.3 (ns) 1.6 (ns)
IL4R Interleukin 4 receptor 1.2 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) -2.0 (ns) ns (ns)
IL5 Interleukin 5 (colony-stimulating factor, eosinophil) 1.3 (ns) ns (10.8 ± 0.5) ns (-3.1±3E-4) ns (ns) 2.6 (ns)
IL6 Interleukin 6 (interferon, beta 2) 2.0 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.2 (ns) ns (1.1±4E-6)
IL9 Interleukin 9 ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.3 (ns) 1.3 (ns)
MIF Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (glycosylation-inhibiting factor) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) -2.0 (ns) 10.4 (ns)
MSN Moesin ns (ns) -2.6 (ns) -3.4 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
PPARG Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1.2 (ns) -3.5 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
PSME1 Proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator subunit 1 ns (3.4 ± 2) -3.1 (ns) -2.4 (-3.5 ± 2.8) ns (ns) ns (ns)
RGS1 Regulator of G-protein signaling 1 ns (ns) -2.0 (ns) -1.9 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
SCG2 Secretogranin II (chromogranin C) 1.6 ± (ns) 2.1 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
TLR8 Toll-like receptor 8 ns (ns) -2.4 (ns) ns (-2.72 ± 0.2) 1.2 (ns) ns (ns)
VCAM1 Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 1.6 (-3.2±0.02) -4.8 (ns) ns (-2.5± 0.2) ns (ns) ns (ns)
FADD Fas (TNFRSF6)-associated via death domain 1.2 (ns) ns (ns) -10.8 (-2.8±0.6) ns (ns) ns (ns)
COL5A1 Collagen, type V, alpha 1 1.4 (ns) -2.5 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
CTGF Connective tissue growth factor 1.3 (1.3±0.3) -2.8 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
DMP1 Dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1 1.2 (ns) 1.9 (3.6±0.05) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
FGF2 Fibroblast growth factor 2 (basic) 1.6 (ns) ns (ns) ns (-3.1±2E-3) 1.3 (ns) 1.6 (ns)
FGF7 Hypothetical fibroblast growth factor 7 (keratinocyte growth factor) 1.4 (ns) ns (ns) ns (-2.6±0.1) 1.2 (1.9±7E-5) ns (1.9±2E-5)
STC1 Stanniocalcin 1 1.4 (ns) 2.2 (12.1±0.01) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns)
TGFB3 Transforming growth factor, beta 3 1.3 (7.3±3E-4) ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 3.2 (1.8 ± 4E-6)
TKY2 Tyrosine kinase 2 ns (ns) -1.9 (ns) -2 (-2.4±0.03) ns (ns) ns (ns)
EPOR Ethropoietin receptor 1.4 (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.8 (ns) ns (ns)
IL15RA Interleukin 15 receptor, alpha ns (ns) ns (ns) ns (ns) 1.4 (ns) -1.6 (ns)

Data shows significant (P<0.05) fold change in differential gene expression (positive and negative values for upregulated and downregulated genes in infected animals, respectively) obtained in the microarray analyses and by real-time RT-PCR (shown in parenthesis; average±SD). Abbreviations: ns, not significant differences in gene expression levels between infected and uninfected animals; WB-A, wild boar infected with A. phagocytophilum; WB-B, wild boar infected with B. suis; WB-M, wild boar infected with M. bovis; S-A, sheep infected with A. phagocytophilum; S-B, sheep infected with B. ovis

Table 4: Differential expression of genes in common host-cell biological processes, molecular functions and pathways affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria.

Effect of Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium infection on wild boar and sheep innate and adaptive immunity

These results showed that Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium infection of wild boar and sheep affect the expression of genes involved in host innate and adaptive immunity. However, not surprisingly, the way in which host immune response was affected varied between different host-bacteria interactions. Differences in host immune response between different host-pathogen interactions could be related to host/pathogen-specific factors and/or differences in gene expression between early (acute) and late (chronic) infections. Nevertheless, common to all bacteria-host interactions was the induction of innate immunity through upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins IL1B and/or IL6 that are induced in phagocytes after toll-like receptor (TLR) recognition resulting in activation of the complement system and pathogen opsonization for phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils [13]. As in previous experiments with cultured human macrophages infected with Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and M. tuberculosis [2], shared responses included genes encoding receptors and signal transduction molecules affecting the cytokine-receptor interaction, hematopoietic cell lineage and Jak-STAT signaling pathways. However, adaptive immunity was induced through upregulation of genes such as cluster differentiation 4 (CD4) and IL21 only in wild boar and sheep infected with A. phagocytophilum.

The results obtained herein showed that the upregulation of host innate immune pro-inflammatory genes and signaling pathways constitute a general antibacterial mechanism in response to pathogenic intracellular bacteria of the genera Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium, a finding previously suggested in other studies with Brucella spp. [5,8,14], Mycobacterium spp. [2,4,15-20] and A. phagocytophilum [7,21].

Role for the Jak-STAT pathway during Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium infection of wild boar and sheep

Pathway-focused analysis revealed a role for the Jak-STAT pathway during bacterial intracellular infection, a fact reported before in Mycobacterium-infected cells [22-24] but not during Brucella spp. and A. phagocytophilum infection. This result highlighted the importance of integrating data from different trascriptomics experiments to discover common host-cell mechanisms affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria.

In mammals, the Jak-STAT pathway is the principal signaling mechanism for a wide array of cytokines and growth factors such as CSF2, IL15, IL21, IL4R, IL5, IL6, IL9, TKY2, EPOR, IL15RA shown here to be differentially expressed in infected animals [25]. Jak activation stimulates cell proliferation, differentiation, cell migration and apoptosis resulting in hematopoiesis and immune development among other processes [25]. Predictably, downregulation of the Jak- STAT pathway activity affect these processes but failure to properly regulate Jak signaling cause inflammation, erythrocytosis and leukemia among other diseases [25]. Herein, a clear activation of the Jak-STAT pathway was observed in A. phagocytophilum-infected wild boar and sheep when compared to uninfected controls (Table 4). For Brucella spp., infection resulted in the upregulation of some ligands and the downregulation of others that may result in a balanced regulation of the Jak-STAT signaling to prevent negative effects associated with improper regulation of this pathway (Table 4). As previously reported [22-24], M. bovis infection of wild boar clearly produced a downregulation of some of the Jak-STAT effectors such as IL5 and TKY2 (Table 4).

Conclusions

These results suggested that mycobacteria and brucellae induce host innate immune responses while manipulating adaptive immunity through Jak-STAT pathway and other mechanisms to circumvent hostcell defenses and establish infection. In contrast, A. phagocytophilum infection induces both innate and adaptive immunity, those suggesting that this pathogen uses other mechanisms to circumvent host-cell defenses. These mechanisms may include dowregulation of other adaptive immune genes such as IL2 and IL4 [7,26] and delaying the apoptotic death of neutrophils [7,21,27,28] through activation of the Jak-STAT pathway among other mechanisms.

These results improved our understanding of host-pathogen interactions by characterizing common host-cell mechanisms affected by pathogenic intracellular bacteria of the genera Anaplasma, Brucella and Mycobacterium in natural reservoir hosts and provided insights into mechanisms of pathogenesis that could be used as targets for therapeutic intervention and vaccine development. In fact, some of the cytokine-receptor interactions described here such as those involving IL4 and IL6 have already been used to characterize the immune response to parenteral and oral Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination to prevent M. bovis infection in wild boar [6,29] and the protective response to the B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine in sheep for the control of B. ovis [9], respectively.

Acknowledgements

We thank members of our laboratories for fruitful discussions and technical assistance. This research was supported by the Grupo Santander and Fundación Marcelino Botín, Spain (project Control of Tuberculosis in Wildlife) and the EU FP7, ANTIGONE project number 278976. R.C. Galindo was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia y Educación (MEC), Spain.

References

  1. Bhavsar AP, Guttman JA, Finlay BB (2007) Manipulation of host-cell pathways by bacterial pathogens. Nature 449: 827-834.
  2. Nau GJ, Richmond JF, Schlesinger A, Jennings EG, Lander ES, et al. (2002) Human macrophage activation programs induced by bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 5: 1503-1508.
  3. Naranjo V, Höfle U, Vicente J, Martín MP, Ruiz-Fons F, et al. (2006) Genes differentially expressed in oropharyngeal tonsils and mandibular lymph nodes of tuberculous and non-tuberculous European wild boars naturally exposed to Mycobacterium bovis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 46: 298-312.
  4. Galindo RC, Ayoubi P, Naranjo V, Gortazar C, Kocan KM, et al. (2009) Gene expression profiles of European wild boar naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 129: 119-125.
  5. Galindo RC, Muñoz PM, de Miguel MJ, Marin CM, Labairu J, et al. (2010) Gene expression changes in spleens of the wildlife reservoir species, Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa), naturally infected with Brucella suis biovar 2. J Gen Genomics 37: 725-736.
  6. Lastra JM, Galindo RC, Gortázar C, Ruiz-Fons F, de la Fuente J, et al. (2009) Expression of immunoregulatory genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of European wild boar immunized with BCG. Vet Microbiol 134: 334-339.
  7. Galindo RC, Ayoubi P, García-Pérez AL, Naranjo V, Kocan KM, et al. (2008) Differential expression of inflammatory and immune response genes in sheep infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 126: 27-34.
  8. Galindo RC, Muñoz PM, de Miguel MJ, Marin CM, Blasco JM, et al. (2009) Differential expression of inflammatory and immune response genes in rams experimentally infected with a rough virulent strain of Brucella ovis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 127: 295-303.
  9. Galindo RC, Muñoz PM, de Miguel MJ, Marin CM, Blasco JM, et al. (2009) Characterization of possible correlates of protective response against Brucella ovis infection in rams immunized with the B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine. Vaccine 27: 3039-3044.
  10. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, et al. (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 4: P3.
  11. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44-57.
  12. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.  Methods 25: 402-408.
  13. Medzhitov R (2007) Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 449: 819-826.
  14. Eskra L, Mathison A, Splitter G (2003) Microarray analysis of mRNA levels from RAW264.7 macrophages infected with Brucella abortus. Infect Immun 71: 1125-1133.
  15. Goto Y, Nakamura RM, Takahashi H, Tokunaga T (1984) Genetic control of resistance to Mycobacterium intracellular infection in mice. Infect Immun 46: 135-140.
  16. Ragno S, Romano M, Howell S, Pappin DJ, Jenner PJ, et al. (2001) Changes in gene expression in macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a combined transcriptomic and proteomic approach. Immunology 104: 99-108.
  17. Keller C, Lauber J, Blumenthal A, Buer J, Ehlers S (2004) Resistance and susceptibility to tuberculosis analyzed at the transcriptome level: lessons from mouse macrophages. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 84: 144-158.
  18. Koul A, Herget T, Klebl B, Ullrich A (2004) Interplay between mycobacteria and host signalling pathways. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 189-202.
  19. Naranjo V, Villar M, Martín-Hernando MP, Vidal D, Höfle U, et al. (2007) Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of differential stress/inflammatory responses in mandibular lymph nodes and oropharyngeal tonsils of European wild boars naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Proteomics 7: 220-231.
  20. Fernández de Mera IG, Pérez de la Lastra JM, Ayoubi P, Naranjo V, Kocan KM, et al. (2008) Differential expression of inflammatory and immune response genes in mesenteric lymph nodes of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Dev Comp Immunol 32: 85-91.
  21. Carlyon JA, Fikrig E (2003) Invasion and survival strategies of Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Cell Microbiol 5: 743-754.
  22. Jacobsen M, Repsilber D, Kleinsteuber K, Gutschmidt A, Schommer-Leitner S, et al. (2011) Suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 is affected in T-cells from tuberculosisTB patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 1323-1331.
  23. Imai K, Kurita-Ochiai T, Ochiai K (2003) Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin infection promotes SOCS induction and inhibits IFN-gamma-stimulated JAK/STAT signaling in J774 macrophages. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 39: 173-180.
  24. Manca C, Tsenova L, Freeman S, Barczak AK, Tovey M, et al. (2005) Hypervirulent M. tuberculosis W/Beijing strains upregulate type I IFNs and increase expression of negative regulators of the Jak-Stat pathway. J Interferon Cytokine Res 25: 694-701.
  25. Rawlings JS, Rosler KM, Harrison DA (2004) The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. J Cell Sci 117: 1281-1283.
  26. Kim HY, Mott J, Zhi N, Tajima T, Rikihisa Y (2002) Cytokine gene expression by peripheral blood leukocytes in horses experimentally infected with Anaplasma phagocytophila. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9: 1079-1084.
  27. Borjesson DL, Kobayashi SD, Whitney AR, Voyich JM, Argue CM, et al. (2005) Insights into pathogen immune evasion mechanisms: Anaplasma phagocytophilum fails to induce an apoptosis differentiation program in human neutrophils. J Immunol 174: 6364-6372.
  28. Woldehiwet Z (2008) Immune evasion and immunosuppression by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of tick-borne fever of ruminants and human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Vet J 175: 37-44.
  29. Ballesteros C, Garrido JM, Vicente J, Romero B, Galindo RC, et al. (2009) First data on Eurasian wild boar response to oral immunization with BCG and challenge with a Mycobacterium bovis field strain. Vaccine 27: 6662-6668.
Citation: Galindo RC, de la Fuente J (2012) Transcriptomics Data Integration Reveals Jak-STAT as a Common Pathway Affected by Pathogenic Intracellular Bacteria in Natural Reservoir Hosts. J Proteomics Bioinform 5: 108-115.

Copyright: © 2012 Galindo RC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top