GET THE APP

Therapeutic Effect of Amaranthus hybridus on Diabetic Nephropathy
Journal of Developing Drugs

Journal of Developing Drugs
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-6631

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 1

Therapeutic Effect of Amaranthus hybridus on Diabetic Nephropathy

Balasubramanian T* and Karthikeyan M
Department of Pharmacology, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, Kerala, India, E-mail: karthikeyanpgt@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author: Balasubramanian T, Department of Pharmacology, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, Poonthavanam Post, Kizhattur Village, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram Dist, Kerala-679 325, India Email:

Abstract

Background: Amaranthus hybridus is claimed to be useful in treating dysentery, diarrhoea, hemorrhage of the bowel, ulcers, liver infections and knee pain in Indian traditional system of medicine, and in southern India, the leaves are used in folk medicine for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The present research was conducted to evaluate the nephron protective effect of ethanol extract of Amaranthus hybridus leaves in Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. Materials and methods: Wister albino rats were induced diabetic by a single dose of STZ (50 mg/kg i.p.). The serum and urine renal function parameters-creatinine, urea, uric acid, albumin and total proteins were measured on 15th day after daily oral administration of Amaranthus hybridus ethanolic leaves extract (AHELE) for 14 days at doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg. The antioxidant potential of extract was also determined. Hence, the effects of the AHELE treatments on the kidney histological profile in STZ nephrotoxic rats were observed. Results: The present study investigation showed that the AHELE significantly (P<0.001) attenuated elevations in the serum levels of creatinine, urea and uric acid, and urine levels of total proteins and albumin, in diabetic treated rats as compared with diabetic control rats. The extract also improved altered serum total protein associated with diabetes nephropathy. A significant decrease in TBARS (P<0.001), and significant increase in SOD (P<0.001), CAT (P<0.01) and reduced glutathione levels (P<0.001) were observed in the kidney of rats treated with AHELE. Furthermore, the histopathological study of kidney in drug treated rats shows significant protective effect against STZ oxidative stress. Conclusions: Our results suggest that Amaranthus hybridus possesses significant nephronprotective effect against oxidative damage in diabetic rats.

<

Keywords: Amaranthus hybridus; Nephronprotective; Diabetic rats; Histopathology; Creatinine

Introduction

Diabetes Nephropathy, a chronic metabolic complication of diabetes mellitus, is characterized by elevated levels of serum glucose, creatinine, urea and uric acid in addition to abnormal histopathological changes in kidney. In the recent past, many antidiabetic agents are introduced; still the diabetes and the related nephropathy complication continue to be a major medical problem, not only in developed countries but also in developing countries. Not with standing much research work, the diabetic kidney damages are increasing rapidly and patients with diabetes kidney failure undergo either painful dialysis or kidney transplantation [1] which is both costly and harmful. More and more interest is now growing about plant use as an alternative therapy for protecting kidney damage in patients with diabetes mellitus. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been widely implicated in the pathogenicity of diabetes mellitus and its nephropathy. A number of clinical studies suggest that the antioxidants in medicinal plants are key factors in reducing the incidence of diabetic nephropathy. Traditional medicines and extracts from medicinal plants with antioxidant potential have been extensively used as alternative medicine for better control and management of diabetes nephropathy [2]. However, searching for new antidiabetic drugs with nephroprotective properties from natural plants is currently very important.

Amaranthus hybridus L. (Amaranthaceae) commonly known as ‘Cheera’ in Malayalam, is an erect branched annual herb distributed throughout tropical and temperate regions of India as a common weed in the agricultural fields and wastelands. In traditional medicinal system different parts of the plant Amaranthus hybridus (A. hybridus) have been mentioned to be useful in a variety of diseases. Traditionally, the plant has been used in treating dysentery, diarrhoea, ulcers and hemorrhage of the bowel due to its astringent property [3-5]. In southern India, the leaves are used in folk medicine for the treatment of diabetes. Leaves possess antibacterial effect, cleansing effect and also help to reduce tissue swelling [5]. In Nigeria, A. hybridus leaves combined with condiments are used to prepare soup [6-8]. In Congo, their leaves are eaten as spinach or green vegetables [6,9]. These leaves boiled and mixed with a groundnut sauce are eaten as salad in Mozambique and in West Africa [10,11]. The Amaranthus species contains amaranthine, quercetin, and kaempferol glycosides [12]. A. hybridus leaves are used as an antidote for snake and scorpion bite [13,14].

Amaranthus species were of great importance in pre-Colombian American people’s diets [15] and A. cruentus and A. hybridus have a high nutritional value [16] (Fernand et al.). The consumption of A. cruentus products is advised for patients with celiac disease and, therefore, also for diabetic persons [17]. A. hybridus has been used traditionally for the treatment of liver infections and knee pain and for its laxative, diuretic, and cicatrisation properties [16].

Furthermore, recent studies established theantihyperglycemic activities of other species of Amaranthus genus as A. spinosus [18] and A. viridis [19,20]. However, based on the literature survey, there is no scientific report proving the anti-hyperglycemic efficacy of this particular species. Therefore, the current study was designed to evaluate the nephroprotective activity of Amaranthus hybridus in STZ induced diabetic rats.

Materials and Methods

Drugs and chemicals

Streptozotocin (STZ), Trichloro Acetic Acid (TCA), Thiobarbituric Acid (TBA), Reduced Glutathione (GSH), Tris HCl, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS), Nitro Blue Tetrazolium (NBT), reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NADH), Dimetylsulfoxide (DMSO) and Phenazinemethosulfate (PMS) were purchased from SISCO Research Laboratory, Mumbai, India. Glibenclamide was obtained from Prudence Pharma Chem, Ankeshwara, and Gujarat, India. The solvents and chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Plant material

The leaves of A. hybridus L. were collected during the month June 2013 from agricultural and fallow fields of Kulukkallur, Palakkad district, Kerala. The plant was taxonomically identified and authenticated by Dr. Prabhu Kumar, Scientist, Plant Systematics and Genetic Resources Division, Centre for Medicinal Plant Research (CMPR), Department of AYUSH, Government of India, Kottakal, and Malappuram district, Kerala and a voucher specimen (ACPPCTB) has been preserved in our laboratory for further reference. The leaves of the plant were shade dried and powdered with a mechanical grinder. The powdered plant material was then passed through a 60-mesh sieve and stored in an air-tight container for future use.

Preparation of plant extract

The coarse powdered leaves of A. hybridus (500 g) was packed in the Soxhlet apparatus and extracted with 1.5 L of 95% ethanol at a temperature of 40°-50°C for 72 h. The solvent was completely removed in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure at a temperature of 40°C and a semisolid mass was obtained (AHELE, yield 14% w/w). The dried AHELE was suspended in 5% tween 80 in normal saline and used for the present study.

Preliminary phytochemical screening

The extract was screened for the presence of various phyto constituents employing following standard screening tests [21-23].

Test for Steroids: Libermann-Burchard Test, Salkowski Test

Test for the Triterpenoids; Noller test

Test for Alkaloids: Mayer’s test, Dragendroff’s test, Wagner’s test, Hager’s test.

Test for Flavonoids: lead acetate test, Shinoda’s Test.

Test for Glycosides: Legal’s Test, A. Tollen’s Test.

Test for Tannins: Ferric chloride test.

Test for Saponins: Foam test, Blood haemolysis test.

Test for Proteins: Millon’s test, Ninhydrin test, Biurette test.

Test for Carbohydrate: Molisch’s test, Fehling’s test, Benedict’s test.

Experimental animals

Studies were conducted using Wistar albino rats of either sex weighing 150-200 g. They were purchased from, Small animal breeding station (SABS), Government Veterinary Medical College, Mannuthy, Thrissur (Dist.), Kerala, India. The animals were randomly grouped (n=6) and housed in polyacrylic cages (38 × 23 × 10 cm) and maintained under standard laboratory conditions (Temperature 25 ± 2°C; relative humidity 55 ± 10%) with dark and light cycle (14/10 h). They were fed on a standard dry pellet diet (Small animal breeding unit, Government Veterinary College, Mannuthy, Thrissur District, India) and water ad libitum. The rats were acclimatized to laboratory condition for 1 week before commencement of experiment and were maintained in a well-ventilated animal house. Animals described as fasting had been deprived of food for at least 12 h but were allowed free access to drinking water. All procedures described were reviewed and approved by the Al Shifa College of pharmacy animal ethical committee (Reg. No: 1195/ac/08/CPCSEA 21 August 2013).

Acute oral toxicity study

An acute oral toxicity study was performed as per Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) – 423 guidelines [24]. Wistar albino rats (150-200 g) were randomly distributed to six groups of three each. The animals were fasted overnight and AHELE was administered orally at a dose of up to 2000 mg/kg body weight. Mortality and general behavior such as grooming, sedation, hyperactivity, loss of righting reflex, respiratory rate, and convulsions of the animals were observed periodically for 72 h. The animals were observed continuously for the initial 2 h and intermittently for the next 6 h and then again at 24, 48, and 72 h, following drug administration.

Induction of experimental diabetes

Rats were fasted for 16 h before the induction of diabetes with Streptozotocin (STZ). A freshly prepared solution of STZ (40 mg/ kg body weight) in 0.1 M cold citrate buffer, pH 4.5, were injected intraperitoneally in a volume of 1 ml/kg [25] and the control rats were injected with the citrate buffer alone. In order to control the hypoglycemia during the first day after the STZ administration, diabetic rats were given 5% glucose solution orally. Hyperglycemia was confirmed by the elevated fasting glucose levels in blood, determined at 48 hr and then on day 6 after injection. Rats with moderate diabetes exhibiting fasting blood glucose levels in the range of 250-280 mg/100 ml were selected for the studies.

Nephroprotective activity study in diabetic rats (14 days): Rats were fasted for 16 h and classified into five groups of six each [26]. Group I, normal control, were given normal saline orally at a dose of 5 ml/kg. Group II, STZ-diabetic control, received normal saline at a dose of 5 ml/kg orally. Groups III and IV STZ-diabetic rats were treated with AHELE orally at a dose of 200 and 400 mg/kg, respectively. Group V, STZ-diabetic rats, were administered with glibenclamide at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg orally. The treatment was continued once daily for 14 days.

Effect of ethanol extract of Amaranthus hybridus on serum and urine renal parameters: On the 15th day, blood was collected from the overnight-fasted rats by retro-orbital bleeding, using micro capillary technique. Fasting blood glucose level of each animal was determined. Serum was separated and used for the determination of biochemical parameters, such as creatinine, urea, uric acid and total proteins (using Automated Span Diagnostic Reagents, Mumbai, India). Rats were accommodated in metabolic cages for urine collection for 2 days in order to become familiar with the environment of the cage. Twentyfour hour urine samples were collected from all groups to determine urine total protein and albumin. After urine collection, all the rats were sacrificed by euthanasia. Kidneys were excised immediately, rinsed in ice-cold normal saline (pH 7.4), blotted dry, and weighed.

Estimation of antioxidant assays: A 10% w/v of kidney homogenate was prepared in 0.15 M Tris-HCl buffers (pH: 7.4). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000 × g for 20 min at 4°C to remove the cell debris and then the supernatant was centrifuged (REMI C-24) at 12,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C. The supernatant obtained were used for the determination of lipid peroxidation [27], reduced glutathione content [28], Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) [29] and Catalase (CAT) [30].

Histopathological study: The fragments from the kidney tissues were fixed in 10% neutral formalin solution, embedded in paraffin, and then, stained with Hematoxylin (H) and Eosin (E). The sections were examined microscopically for the evaluation of histopathological changes.

Statistical analysis

The experimental data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Dunett’s test. The results were considered statistically significance if P<0.05.

Results

Preliminary phytochemical analysis

The qualitative phytochemical screening of the AHELE has revealed presence of flavonoids, Glycosides, terpenoids, saponins, alkaloids, tannins and steroids (Table 1).

Phytoconstituents Amarantus hybridus ethanol leaf extract
Alkaloids +
Glycosides +
Carbohydrates -
Steroids +
Triterpenes +
Saponins +
Tannins +
Proteins and amino acids -
Flavanoids +

Note: + and - symbol represent presence and absence of Phytoconstituents respectively.

Table 1: Phytochemical constituents of Amarantus hybridus.

Acute oral toxicity study

Administration of Amaranthus hybridus ethanol leaf extract (AHELE) to Wistar rats did not show any mortality and gross behavioral changes up to 2000 mg/kg body weight. Further dosing was not performed to estimate the LD50 (lethal dose) value. According to the OECD 423 guidelines for the acute toxicity, an LD50 dose of 2000 mg/kg and above is categorized as unclassified and hence the drug is found to be safe. Based on the acute toxicity studies, the dose 200 mg/kg (low dose i.e., 10%) and 400 mg/kg (high dose i.e., 20%) of the AHELE was selected as the therapeutic dose.

Effect on serum and urine renal function parameters

Repeated oral administration of AHEL Eat a dose of 200 and 400 mg/kg in STZ induced diabetic rats for 14 days significantly (P<0.05, p<0.001) reduced the elevated fasting blood glucose levels when compared to diabetic control rats. In STZ induced diabetic control rats there was a significant (p<0.001) increase in serum creatinine, urea and uric acid, but were reduced by AHELE (200 and 400 mg/kg). In addition, there was a significant (p<0.001) decrease in serum total proteins levels in diabetic control rats compared with normal control. Oral administration of AHELE significantly (p<0.001) increased the serum total protein. Compared to the non-diabetic control rats, urine albumin and total proteins levels increased significantly (p<0.001), in STZ-induced diabetic control rats. Treatment of STZ-induced diabetic rats with AHEE resulted in marked decrease in urine albumin and total proteins (p<0.001) as compared to diabetic control rats (Table 2).

Groups Serum creatinine(mg/dl) Urea (mg/dl) Uric acid(mg/dl) Serum totalprotein (g/dl) Urine totalprotein (mg/dl) Urine albumin(mg/dl) Serum glucose levels(mg/dl)
1st day 15th day
Normal control 0.85 ± 0.05 25.38 ± 1.14 2.97 ± 0.15 8.11 ± 0.23 15.68 ± 0.89 2.30 ± 0.13 91.74± 1.02 93.70±1.12
DM control 2.19 ± 0.11 ** 51.73 ± 1.52 ** 4.89 ± 0.13 ** 4.26 ± 0.42 ** 35.91 ± 1.64** 13.02 ± 0.48 ** 286.25±3.25 287.0±2.20**
DM+AHELE 200 1.15 ± 0.13b 34.53 ± 1.41 b 3.85 ± 0.11 b 5.94 ± 0.35b 22.04 ± 1.03b 5.70 ± 0.42b 284.32±3.89 181.2±1.28b
DM+AHELE 400 0.91 ± 0.04b 25.50 ± 1.35 b 3.08 ± 1.02 b 7.52 ± 0.25b 19.40 ± 0.27b 3.41 ± 0.34b 283.47±2.56 152.2±2.02b
DM+GLIB 0.5 0.90 ± 0.24 b 30.25 ± 1.27 b 3.05 ± 0.12 b 7.61 ± 0.31b 19.24±0.49b 4.40 ± 0.26b 285.00±1.85 122.60±1.2b **

DM: Diabetes mellitus; AHELE: Amarantus hybridus ethanol leaf extract, GLIB: Glibenclamide; Values are given as mean ± SEM, 6 rats in each group; **P<0.001 as compared to normal control group; bP<0.001 as compared to diabetic control group.

Table 2: Effect of oral administration Amarantus hybridus ethanol leaf extract on serum and urine biomarkers by sub - acute treatment in STZ-induced diabetic rats.

Effects on renal in vivo antioxidant activities

Lipid peroxidation: As depicted in Tables 1 and 2, the amount of MDA, an end product of lipid peroxidation, in the rats kidney tissues, significantly increased in STZ-induced diabetic control rats, compared to the non-diabetic control rats. The treatment of rats with AHELE (200 and 400 mg/kg) and Glibenclamide resulted in a significant decrease in the concentration of MDA than in the diabetic control rats (Table 3).

Groups Lipid peroxidation (nmol/mg protein ) Glutathione (μM/gmprotein) Superoxide dismutase (IU/mg protein) Catalase (nmol/min/mg protein)
Normal control 7.23±0.51 61.28±1.01 39.49±0.68 54.54±1.75
DM control 24.49±0.81a,** 29.81±0.79a,** 15.65±0.17a,** 18.45±0.89a,**
DM+AHELE 200 13.92±0.52b,** 40.77±1.22b,** 25.01±0.12b,** 39.80±1.26b,**
DM+AHELE 400 10.29±0.65b,** 51.08±0.70b,** 37.47±0.37b,** 49.69±1.84b,**
DM+GLIB 0.5 11.76±0.40b,** 41.83±1.37b,** 33.93±0.47b,** 42.33±1.24b,**

Values are given as mean ± SEM, 6 rats in each group; **P<0.001 as compared to normal control group; bP<0.001 as compared to diabetic control group.

Table 3: Effect of oral administration Amarantus hybridus ethanol leaf extract on kidney in vivo antioxidant system and glycogen by sub -acute treatment in STZ-induced diabetic rats.

Reduced glutathione content superoxide dismutase and catalase: The total GSH content, SOD and catalase (CAT) activities in the STZ-induced diabetic rats were significantly (p<0.001) decreased in kidney. However, the renal SOD, CAT activities, and GSH levels were significantly elevated in the diabetic rats treated with AHELE (200 and 400 mg/kg) and Glibenclamide when compared with the diabetic control rats (Table 3).

Histopathological studies of kidney

Histopathological evaluation of non-diabetic control rats kidneys shown normal architecture (Figure 1). In STZ-induced diabetic control groups (Figure 2) resulted in glomerular hypertrophy (GL), mild thickening of basement membrane, increased Bowman’s space (BM), tubular dilation, intra-tubular hyaline casts and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration. Treatment with AHELE (200 and 400 mg/kg reduced tubular necrosis, reduced cell infiltration, show normal Bowman’s space with glomerulus, and maintaining near normal kidney structure (Figures 3 and 4).

developing-drugs-normal-rat-kidney

Figure 1: A sectional representation of normal rat kidney at 400X magnification (Haematoxylin and Eosin stain) showing normal Glomeruli (GL) with an intact Bowman’s capsule (BM), Proximal convoluted (CT) and Distal convoluted (DT) tubules.

developing-drugs-proximal-convoluted

Figure 2: A representative section of STZ diabetic control rat kidney at 400X magnification (Haematoxylin and Eosin) showing severe glomerular degeneration (GD), mild change density of mesenchyme, thickening of the basement membrane, proximal convoluted tubular degeneration (TD), obliterated distal convoluted tubular lumen increased Bowman’s space (BS), interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration and tubular dilation.

developing-drugs-glomerular-degeneration

Figure 3: A representative section of 200 mg/kg/day Amarantus hybridus ethanol leaf extract treated STZ diabetic rat kidney at 400X magnification (Haematoxylin and Eosin) showing moderate tubular degeneration (TD) with mild glomerular degeneration (GL) and mild increased Bowman’s space (BS) A.

developing-drugs-Amarantus-hybridus

Figure 4: A sectional representation of 400 mg/kg/day Amarantus hybridus ethanol leaf extract STZ diabetic rat kidney at 400X magnification (Haematoxylin and Eosin) showing normal glomeruli (GL) encapsulated in normal Bowman’s capsule. There is mild tubular degeneration interposed with normal proximal convoluted tubule and distal convoluted tubule.

Discussion

Diabetes nephropathy is probably the fastest growing complex disorder in the world and as knowledge of the heterogeneous nature of the disease increases so does the need for more challenging and appropriate therapies. In people with diabetes mellitus, the diabetic nephropathy is the most important cause of death, of whom, 30-40% eventually develop end-stage renal failure [31]. As there is a growing trend towards using natural remedies adjunct to conventional therapy, traditionally used plants might provide a useful source of new antihyperglycemic compounds with nephroprotective effect. The present research provides an evidence for the beneficial effects of Amaranthus hybridus leaf extract on glucose, serum and urine renal function parameters and oxidative defense system in STZ induced diabetic rats.

In the present study, acute oral toxicity studies revealed that Amaranthus hybridus ethanolic leaf extract (AHELE) did not show any mortality and toxic signs up to 2000 mg/kg body weight and concludes the drug is safe. In this study, we induced a experimental diabetes mellitus in Wistar rats by Streptozotocin (STZ) injection. STZ when administered at a high single dose induces diabetes by the direct toxic effects on pancreatic β-islet cells [32].

The sub-acute anti hyperglycemic studies clearly demonstrated that the AHELE (200 and 400 mg/kg) significantly produced a dosedependent anti hyperglycemic effect in the diabetic rats throughout the course of study.

Several studies reported that STZ administration elevated serum renal markers in rats [33,34] which is the indicator of diabetic nephropathy with altered glomerular filtration rate. The current study also revealed that serum renal bio markers such as creatinine, urea, uric acid and urine renal markers as total proteins and albumin levels were increased in diabetic control rats. The daily administration of ethyl acetate fraction of Stereospermum suavelolens for 14 days caused a significant reduction in serum creatinine, serum urea, serum uric acid, urine total protein and urine albumin levels, and a significant elevation in serum total protein levels in diabetic rats when compared to diabetic control. This data indicates that the AHELE improved the renal functions and reversed the damage in the kidney tissues of diabetic rats.

We also examine antioxidant capacity of the plant extracts, since antioxidants have been reported to prevent oxidative stress and diabetic nephropathy. In diabetic nephropathy, oxidative stress has been found to be mainly due to an increased production of reactive oxygen species and a sharp reduction of antioxidant defenses [35]. In diabetes, hyperinsulinemia increases the activity of the enzyme, fatty acyl coenzyme A oxidase, which initiates β-oxidation of fatty acids, resulting in lipid peroxidation [36]. In the present study, the renal TBARS levels were significantly lower in the AHELE treated groups compared to the diabetic control rats. These findings support that the AHELE may exert antioxidant activities and protect the renal tissues from lipid peroxidation. The possible mechanism by which AHELE may bring about its diabetic nephroprotective action in STZ-induced diabetic rats may be by inhibiting lipid peroxidation in kidney tissues.

Glutathione (GSH), a tripeptide present in all the cells is an important antioxidant. SOD and CAT are enzymes that destroy the peroxides and play a significant role in providing antioxidant defenses to an organism [37,38]. The functions of all three endogenous antioxidants are inter connected and a lowering of their activities results in the accumulation of lipid peroxides and increased oxidative stress in diabetic rats. In our study, it was observed that the AHELE caused a significant increase in the renal SOD, CAT and GSH activities of the diabetic rats. This means that the AHELE can reduce reactive oxygen free radicals and improve the activities of the renal antioxidant enzymes to protect the kidney cellular damage during diabetes nephropathy.

In the present study, histopathological findings also provided supportive evidence for the antioxidant potential of AHELE during diabetes. Moreover, it has been reported that in STZ-induced diabetic rats, the renal undergo pathological changes [39,40] and the important pathologic features of diabetic nephropathy are glomerular hypertrophy, tubular dilation, interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration, mild thickening of basement membrane along with mild changes in the density of mesenchyme with increased Bowman’s space, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis [41]. These diabetic nephropathic changes were also observed in our study, in the STZ diabetic control rats. Treatment with ethyl acetate fractions (200 and 400 mg/kg and glibenclaimde (0.5 m/kg) (Figures 3 and 4) reduced cell infiltration, improved tubular necrosis, show normal Bowman’s space with glomerulus, basement membrane and capillaries, and maintaining near normal kidney architecture. In diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia increases the generation of free radicals by glucose auto-oxidation and the increment of free radicals may lead to kidney cells damage [42]. AHELE treated rats proved that the kidney cells damage might be protected by their potent antioxidant property.

Moreover, the significant antioxidant and nephroprotective activity of AHELE on STZ-induced diabetic rats may be attributed to the presence of biologically active compounds flavonoids, saponins, tannins, and terpenoids in the plant Amaranthus hybridus.

According to these results, AHELE could be a supplement, as an antioxidant therapy, and may be beneficial for correcting the hyperglycaemia and preventing diabetic nephropathy due to lipid peroxidation and free radicals. As the present study is a preclinical one, further proceedings with human volunteers may pave a way for the usage of the drug in human beings.

Conclusion

Food and food supplements have increasingly become attractive alternatives to prevent or treat diabetes and its complications. The present investigation clearly indicates that Amaranthus hybridus exhibits nephroprotective effect in addition to antioxidant effects in STZ induced diabetic rats. However, further studies are necessary to find out the active phytochemicals as well as the exact mechanisms of action involved in antidiabetic potential of this plant.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Centre for Medicinal Plant Research (CMPR), Department of Ayush, Government of India, Kottakal, Malappuram District, Kerala for identification of plant material. The authors thank, Principal, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, Kerala for providing facilities to carry out of the experiments of this research work.

References

  1. National Institute of Health (2007) NIDDK: “National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases” Kidney. US Department of Health and Human services.
  2. Gayathri M, Kannabiran K (2008) Antidiabetic and ameliorative potential of Ficusbengalensis bark extract in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats.Indian J ClinBiochem 23: 394-400.
  3. Krochmal A, Krochmal C (1973) A Guide to Medicinal Plants of the United States. New York Times Book Co., New York: 34.
  4. He HP, Corke H, Cai JG (2003) Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of oil and squalene from amaranthus grain.J Agric Food Chem 51: 7921-7925.
  5. Singh S, Sheoran SS (2011) Evaluation of the antinociceptive activity of Amaranthushybridus Linn. root extracts.Acta Pol Pharm 68: 255-259.
  6. Oke OL, Amaranth (1983) In: "Handbook of Tropical Foods," ed. Chan HT Jr., Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New York: 1.
  7. Mepha HD, Eboh L, Banigbo DEB (2007) Effects of processing treatments on the Nutritive Composition and consumer acceptance of some Nigerian edible leafy vegetables. African Journal of Food and AgricriculturalNutrition Developement 7: 1-18.
  8. Maiyo ZC, Ngure RM, Matasyoh JC, Chepkorir R, et al. (2010) Phytochemical constituents and antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts of three Amaranthus plant species. African Journal of Biotechnology 9: 3178-3182.
  9. Dhellot JR, Matouba E, Maloumbi MG, Nzikou JM, SafouNgoma DG, et al. (2006) Extraction, chemical composition and nutritional characterization of vegetable oils: Case of Amaranthushybridus (Var 1 and 2) of Congo Brazzaville. Afr J Biotechnol 5: 1095-1101.
  10. Oliveira JS, De Carvalho MF (1975) Nutritional value of some edible leaves used in Mozambique. Econ Bot 29: 255-263.
  11. Martin FW, Telek L (1979) Vegetables for the hot humid tropics. Part 6: Amaranth and Celosia. US Department of Agriculture, New Orleans, LA.
  12. Zeashan H, Amresh G, Singh S, Rao CV (2008) Hepatoprotective activity of Amaranthusspinosus in experimental animals.Food ChemToxicol 46: 3417-3421.
  13. Chopra IC (1958) Chopra's Indigenous Drugs of India.2ndedn. UNDhurand Sons Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta, India.
  14. Shinwari ZK, Khan AA, Nakaike T (2003) Medicinal and other useful plants of District Swat, Pakistan.
  15. González R, Tosi E, Ré E, María CA, Ana MRP, et al. (2007) Amaranth starch-rich fraction properties modified by high-temperature heating. Food Chemistry 103: 927-934.
  16. Fernand WN, Adama H, Jeanne FM, Odile GN (2012) Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant and Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitory Activities of Amaranthuscruentus L. and Amaranthushybridus L. Extracts. Pharmaceuticals 5: 613-628.
  17. Guerra-Matias AC, Areas JAG (2005) Glycemic and insulinemic responses in women consuming extruded amaranth (Amaranthuscruentus L). Nutrition Research 25: 815-822.
  18. Sangameswaran B, Ramdas P (2010) Antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidaemic activities of amaranthusspinosuslinn extract onalloxan induced diabetic rats. Malaysian journal of pharmaceutical sciences 8: 13-22.
  19. Ramdas P, Sangameswaran B, Popat M, Khanage S (2012) Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidaemic potential of Amaranthusviridis (L.) Merr in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease: S180-S185.
  20. Ashok Kumar BS, Lakshman K, Jayaveea KN, SheshadriShekar D, Saleemulla K, et al. (2012) Antidiabetic, antihyperlipidemic and antioxidant activities of methanolic extract of Amaranthusviridis Linn in alloxan induced diabetic rats.ExpToxicolPathol 64: 75-79.
  21. Horbone JB (1998) Phytochemical methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall: 60-66.
  22. Kokate CK, Purohit AP, Gokhale SB (1998) Pharmacognosy. 3rd edn. NiraliPrakashan, Pune, India. pp: 122-128.
  23. Trease GE, Evans WC (1972) Pharmacognosy. 10thedn.Balliere Tindal, London 378: 107.
  24. Ecobichon DJ (1997) The basis of toxicology testing.3rd edn. New York: CRC press 43: 240.
  25. Siddiqui O, Sun Y, Liu JC, Chien YW (1987) Facilitated transdermal transport of insulin.J Pharm Sci 76: 341-345.
  26. Nagappa AN, Thakurdesai PA, VenkatRao N, Singh J (2003) Antidiabetic activity of Terminaliacatappa Linn fruits.J Ethnopharmacol 88: 45-50.
  27. Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K (1979) Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by hiobarbituric acid reaction. Analytical Biochemistry 95: 351-358.
  28. Ellman GL (1959) Tissue sulphydryl groups. Arch BiochemBiophys 82: 70-77.
  29. Kakkar P, Das B, Viswanathan PN (1984) A modified spectrophotometric assay of superoxide dismutase.Indian J BiochemBiophys 21: 130-132.
  30. Aebi H, Catalase (1974) Methods in enzymatic analysis. In: Bergmeyer (edn), New York: Academic Press 2: 674-684.
  31. Giorgino F, Laviola L, CavalloPerin P, Solnica B, Fuller J, et al. (2004) Factors associated with progression to macroalbuminuria in microalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study.Diabetologia 47: 1020-1028.
  32. Maiti R, Jana D, Das UK, Ghosh D (2004) Antidiabetic effect of aqueous extract of seed of Tamarindusindica in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.J Ethnopharmacol 92: 85-91.
  33. Alderson NL, Chachich ME, Frizzell N, Canning P, Metz TO, et al. (2004) Effect of antioxidants and ACE inhibition on chemical modification of proteins and progression of nephropathy in the streptozotocin diabetic rat.Diabetologia 47: 1385-1395.
  34. Mauer SM, Steffes MW, Brown DM (1981) The kidney in diabetes.Am J Med 70: 603-612.
  35. Orhan N, Aslan M, Orhan DD, Ergun F, Yesilada E (2006) In-vivo assessment of antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of grapevine leaves (Vitisvinifera) in diabetic rats.J Ethnopharmacol 108: 280-286.
  36. Karam JII (1998) Pancreatichormones and antidiabetic drugs. In: BG Katzing (Edn.), Basic and clinical pharmacology. 7th edn. Stanford: Simon and Schuster Company: 684-705.
  37. Bolzán AD, Bianchi MS (2002) Genotoxicity of streptozotocin.Mutat Res 512: 121-134.
  38. Ghosh T, Maity TK, Sengupta P, Dash DK, Bose A (2008) Antidiabetic and In Vivo antioxidant activity of ethanolic extract of Bacopamonnieri L. Aerial Parts: A possible mechanism of action. Iran J Pharm Res 7: 61-68.
  39. Sun JE, Ao ZH, Lu ZM, Xu HY, Zhang XM, et al. (2008) Antihyperglycemic and antilipidperoxidative effects of dry matter of culture broth of Inonotusobliquus in submerged culture on normal and alloxan-diabetes mice.J Ethnopharmacol 118: 7-13.
  40. Stambe C, Atkins RC, Tesch GH, Kapoun AM, Hill PA, et al. (2003) Blockade of p38alpha MAPK ameliorates acute inflammatory renal injury in rat anti-GBM glomerulonephritis.J Am SocNephrol 14: 338-351.
  41. Haneda M (2006) Mechanisms for the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy.Nihon Rinsho 64 Suppl 2: 427-432.
  42. Sharma S, Kulkarni SK, Chopra K (2006) Curcumin, the active principle of turmeric (Curcuma longa), ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in rats.ClinExpPharmacolPhysiol 33: 940-945.
Citation: Balasubramanian T and Karthikeyan M (2016) Therapeutic Effect of Amaranthus hybridus on Diabetic Nephropathy. J Develop Drugs 5:147.

Copyright: © 2016 Balasubramanian T, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top