The Role of Shade and Nitrogen on Physiological Traits and Second
Journal of Horticulture

Journal of Horticulture
Open Access

ISSN: 2376-0354

Research Article - (2018) Volume 5, Issue 2

The Role of Shade and Nitrogen on Physiological Traits and Secondary Metabolites of Piper betle L

Muttaleb QA1,2*, Abdullah TL1, Hassan SA1, Rashid AA3, Taheri S1, Ahmed OA1 and Abdulameer DA1
1Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
2Technical Institute of Babil, AL-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, 22001, Al Hillah, Babel, Iraq
3Department of Agriculture Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author: Muttaleb QA, Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia, Tel: +601-800-22-5587 Email:


Piper betle, better known as purple betel has received universal attention due to its increasing medicinal value. There is enormous potential to discover various new medicinal compounds in this species and an instantaneous need for the techniques to facilitate the production of high quality. In that connection, shade and nitrogen could play a significant role in the development of phytochemical production. Therefore, the current study utilized the different levels of shade and rates of nitrogen. After harvesting of three months Piper betle seedlings, different physio-chemical traits were observed including photosynthetic rate, stomata conductor, transpiration rates, chlorophyll content (a, b, ab) and secondary metabolites ( total phenolics contents (TPC) concentration, total flavonoids contents (TFC) concentration and antioxidant activate (DPPH and FRAP). The chlorophyll content was more under 30% and 50% shades with 100 kg/ ha of N, whereas full sunlight with 0 kg/ha of N was unsuitable for the Piper betle crop as the high light intensity caused scorching on leaves and stunted in growth, accumulation secondary metabolites and Antioxidant activates. The results of the present study revealed the establishment of shade techniques which influenced the production parameters of the piper species. These findings are an overview of the recent advances and could be further helpful in in vivo studies of Piper betel in regard to their physiological parameters.

Keywords: Piper betle; Shade; Nitrogen; Secondary metabolites


Plants are potential sources of natural bioactive compounds such as primary and secondary metabolites and antioxidants. Medicinal plants quality is determined by their superior genetic characteristics and great biomass with high and consistent secondary metabolite content [1]. The concentration of these secondary metabolites and chemical profile of plants grown in the field can be influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, light quality and light intensity [2].

Piper betle L. is grown in hotter and damper parts of the country [3,4]. In betel vine cultivation, light and nutrients play an imperative role in improving the productivity and quality of leaves. It is one of the main limiting factors for phenolic compound biosynthesis in plants [5]. The rate of photosynthesis as a function of light intensity has been studied by numerous workers [6,7] and in most of these studies showed that the rate of photosynthesis increases rapidly with increasing light intensity. Although, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate also significantly decrease with increasing the shade level [8,9] all these plant components respond differently to light intensity in different plant species. However, light-demanding species are more flexible in both morphology and biomass allocation in response to changes in the light intensity than shade-tolerant species [10].

Nitrogen is also one of the main nutrients required for the plant growth. Its application to plants also supports to utilize the environmental resources like water and light that in turn activate the plant metabolites (amino acids) and their derivatives (enzymes and co-factors), respectively. Plant nutrients are the major important factors in determining the secondary metabolism and antioxidant activity. By increasing fertilizer rate, results could be increased in the concentration of lutein and carotene of parsley and phenolic compounds and carotenoids in lavender. However, in chrysanthemum morifolium, heavy nitrogen fertilization was reported to reduce the flavonoids and antioxidant activity of flowers [11].

Furthermore, the levels and composition of phenolics acid and flavonoids in plants also varies according to the genotype, climate factors and agronomical practices [12]. Cultivation factors like soil type, compost, mulching, and fertilization also can affect the plant secondary metabolites and antioxidant activity of the plant. The fertilizer effect on vegetative growth is well documented. However, the influence of fertilizer rates and shade levels on phytochemical of P. betle is still lacking. Therefore, the current study was designed to conduct an experiment to observe the effects of shades and N rates on physiological components and secondary metabolites of P. betle.

Material and Methods

The experiment was carried out in the field 2 black net houses at the Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia (longitude 101°44’N and latitude 2°58’S, 68 m above sea level) with a mean atmospheric pressure of 1.013 kPa. Stem cuttings of P. betle were propagated for four weeks in small pots (1 kg) and then transferred to white polyethylene bags (45 × 50 cm) filled with a topsoil, coco peat and river sand (ratio 3:2:1). P. betle is a semi-shade plant that requires some amount of shade for maximum production. In order to determine the shade level for maximum production, three levels of shade net including 0%, 30%, and 50% were used in order to reduce light intensity in the field. All light measurements were made between 8 am and 7 pm daily by meter light (phonex, ILTI400, Japan). The average light intensity passing through in each shading treatment was measured about full sunlight = 790 μmol/m2/s, 30% shade = 550 μmol/m2/s and 50% shade 390 μmol/m2/s photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), respectively. The application started after one week from transplanting with a variable rate of N (0, 50, 100, 150 kg/ha), P (100 kg/ha) and K (100 kg/ha). Plants were watered twice daily by spraying irrigation system 7:00 am and 7:00 pm. The plants were harvested after 90 days after transplanting.

The photosynthetic rate measurement was estimated in a closed system of infra-red gas analyzer Li-Cor 6400 Portable Photosynthesis system (Li-Cor 6400, Li-Cor, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA) Figure 1. Before warming and calibrating the portable photosynthesis system. In the first step, the initial zeroing process for the built-in flow meter and in the second step, zeroing process for the infra-red gas analyzer was observed. The procedure was followed similarly as previously reported by Jaafar et al. [11]. The measurements were used optimal cuvette conditions such as 1000 Kumol photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)m, 400 μmol/ mol carbon dioxide, 30°C leaf temperature, 60% relative humidity with air flow rate of 500 cm3/min. The measurements of gas exchange were carried out between 9:00 to 11:00 a.m. Measurements were taken before harvest (90 days) from fully expanded leaf (second frond). The leaf surfaces were cleaned and dried before being enclosed in the leaf cuvette. Data for net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were simultaneously recorded. The operation was automatic, and the data were stored in the Li-Cor 6400 computer within the console and analyzed by “Photosyn Assistant ‘software.


Figure 1: Measurement photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate by Li-Cor 6400 Portable Photosynthesis system.

The actual leaf chlorophyll content was determined by using Coombs method as previously described by Beadle et al. [13]. Leaves were gnawed using cock borer to get four sample area of 1 cm2 per gnawing. Samples were put into a vial, and 20 ml of 80% (v/v) acetone was poured into a vial and covered with aluminum foil. These samples were kept in the dark place for about three to seven days until extraction of all chlorophyll from leaves. Chlorophyll content was then determined by using Spectrophotometer (Model UV 3101 PC) at wavelengths of 664 nm and 647 nm. Coombs method (Coombs et al.,) consisted of following description with formula. The unit of measurement is mg/ cm2.

Chlorophyll a (mg cm-2) = 13.19 A664 - 2.57 A647 Chlorophyll b (mg cm-2) = 22.10 A647 - 5.26 A664 Total chlorophyll content (mg cm-2) = 3.5 × (chlorophyll a + chlorophyll b) / 4

A664 = Value of absorption at wavelength of 664

A647 = Value of absorption at wavelength of 647

3.5 = total of chlorophyll extract in vial

4 = area of leaves for chlorophyll extraction

Secondary Metabolites

Extraction and preparation of sample

Secondary Metabolites were estimated from fresh leaves washed with distilled water and dried under shade for seven days and powdered. Later, the extraction was carried out by do slightly modification as suggested by Dhote et al. [14]. Then, the powdered leaves were a bit extracted in 80% methanol (1 g: 20 ml) with the help of cold maceration at room temperature for about 24 h and were frequently shaken. The process of extraction was repeated three times. The solution was filtered using Whatman’s filter paper No.1, and the solvent was allowed to evaporate completely to obtain the extract. The extract was stored to use in sterile glass vials at the temperature of 4°C.

To determine the total phenolic content of the leaf extract of P. betle, Folin-Ciocalteau Reagent (FCR) was estimated as suggested by Mukherjee et al. [15]. The reaction mixture contained 200 μl of diluted extract, 800 μl of freshly prepared diluted Folin-Ciocalteau reagent and 2 ml of 7.5% sodium carbonate. The final mixture was diluted to 7 ml with deionized water. The mixtures were kept in the dark at ambient conditions for 2 hours to complete the reaction. The absorbance was recorded at 765 nm. Gallic acid was used as a standard, and the results were expressed as mg Gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of dry weight.

Aluminum chloride (AlCl3) was used to determine the total flavonoid content of the extract. A quantity of 0.1 ml methanolic extracts was added to 0.3 ml distilled water followed by 0.03 ml, NaNO2 (5%) and after 5 min 0.03 ml AlCl3 (10%) was also added. After 5 minutes, the reaction mixture was treated with 0.2 ml of 1 mM NaOH. Finally, the reaction mixture was diluted to 1 ml with water, and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm. Quercetin was used as a positive control as suggested by Rintu et al. [16]. The antioxidant activities were carried out through two assay techniques.

1,1- Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay: This procedure was followed according to the procedure previously reported by Braca et al. [17] in order to execute the antioxidant activity of the crude methanolic. P. betle extracts were evaluated against 1,1-diphenyl-2 picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radicals. Various concentration of the methanolic extract was added to the methanolic solution (0.004%) of DPPH on a 96 well ELISA plate. In last, after 30 minutes of incubation, absorbance was determined at 517 nm, and the inhibition percent activity was calculated utilizing the following formula:

AA% = (Absorbance sample – Absorbance empty sample) × 100) / Absorbance controls

However, the blank samples contained 1 ml methanol + 2.5 ml from various concentrations of P. betle extracts. Furthermore, control sample contained 1 ml of 0.3 mM DPPH + 2.5 ml from methanol. In optic density of the samples, the control and empty samples were measured in comparison with methanol where tocopherols (α) were positive controls.

Ferric reducing antioxidant: Power (FRAP) Assay: Ferric reducing the antioxidant potential of the extract was analyzed using the method proposed by Firuzi et al. [18]. FRAP solution was prepared by adding 200 ml of 300 mM acetate buffer (which was adjusted to pH of 3.6 by the adding of acetic acid) to 20 ml of 20 mM ferric chloride hexahydrate (which was dissolved in distilled water) and 20 ml of 10 mM 2,4, 6-tri-(2-pyridyl)-triazine (TPTZ) (dissolved in 40 mMHCl). Ferrous sulphate standard graph was prepared by taking a different concentration of ferrous sulphate (0.1-1 mM). 120 μl distilled water/standard/sample was added to 4 ml of the FRAP solution and absorbance was taken at 593 nm after 4 minutes. Ferrous sulphate equivalent concentration in mM was calculated from the standard graph and expressed as mmol ferrous sulphate equivalent/g on a dry weight basis (mmol Fe+2/g DW).

The experiments were nested and carried out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results were presented with Mean ± S.D, and Tukey test at 0.05 probabilities was utilized to separate the means with significant differences. Meanwhile, the correlation was used to investigate the relationship between all the physiological parameters. All the analysis was done utilizing Statistical Analysis Software version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc. 2009).


Net photosynthetic rate (PN) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in those plants which were grown under 30% shade. PN of plant increased with a decrease light intensity (Figure 2). In general, the photosynthesis rate declined in the following order 30% > 50% > 0% and so as well nitrogen rate 100 > 150 > 50 > 0 kg/ha, respectively. The plants under 30% shade with 100 kg N/ha showed the highest PN 10.13 μmol m−2s−1 followed by 8.69 μmol m−2s−1 at 150 kg N/ha under the same shading. However, the similar result (8.68 μmol m−2s−1) with no significant different (P > 0.05) was also observed with 100 kg N/ha under 50% shade. The plants under full sunlight had the low PN as compared to those plants which were kept under 30% and 50% shades. It was due to the exposure of the full sun which severely damaged the plants from leaf scorching and had stunted growth as compared to other treatments.


Figure 2: Effect of different nitrogen rates and shade levels on photosynthetic rate (PN), of P. betle.

The stomata conductance (GS) increased with increasing shading. GS with the application of N at 100 kg N/ha showed significantly highest (P < 0.05) with a mean value of 0.13 μmol m m−2s−1 under 30 % shade, however, 150 and 100 kg N/ha under 30 % and 50 % shade showed similar results with no significant difference. The results were lowest under 0% shade in control (Figure 3).


Figure 3: Effect of different N rates and shade levels on stomata conductance (GS) of P. betle.

The transpiration rate (E) was significantly highest (P < 0.05) at 30% shade with the application of nitrogen at the rate of 100 kg N/ha. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in transpiration rate in plants those were kept under 30 % and 50 % shades with 50 and 150 N kg/ha. The results were lowest under 0% shade in control (Figure 4).


Figure 4: Effect of different nitrogen rates and shade levels on transpiration rate (E) of P. betle.

In the present study, chlorophyll concentration was significantly influenced (P <0.05) by the different shade levels and nitrogen rates. Increasing light intensities with decreasing shade levels and nitrogen rates enhanced the amount of chlorophyll (a, b) and total chlorophyll (a+b). In total chlorophyll content increased with increasing shade and nitrogen rate (Figure 5). Meanwhile, chlorophyll was affected with the highest value at 100 kg/ha under 30% shade, whereas no significant difference between 100 and 150 N kg/ha under 50% shade and the lowest value was found in the control treatment.


Figure 5: Effect of different nitrogen rates and shade levels on chlorophyll (a) content in P. betle.

The effect of different light intensities and nitrogen rates on the chlorophyll (b) of P. betle (fresh leaves) also showed a statistically significantly different. The highest chlorophyll (b) content (1.83 mg/ cm2) with 100 kg of N/ha was recorded at the lowest light intensity (50% shade). These results were not different statistically for chlorophyll content b (1.76 mg/cm2) with the application of N at a rate of 50 and 150 kg of N/ha under the same level of shade but were different at 30% shade. Beside the chlorophyll content b (1.55 and 1.49 mg/cm2) with the application of N rates under 30% shade showed statically no difference between 50 and 100 kg/ha (Figure 6).


Figure 6: Effect of different nitrogen rates and shade levels on chlorophyll (b) content in P. betle.

The overall total chlorophyll concentration significantly increased with increasing light intensity under 0% to 50% shade and with increasing nitrogen rates from 0 < 50 < 100 < 150 kg/ha. A high concentration of chlorophyll (a + b) 3.81 and 3.76 mg/cm2 was obtained under 30 and 50% shade respectively with 100 kg N/ ha (Figure 7).


Figure 7: Effect of different nitrogen rates and shade levels on chlorophyll (a + b) content in P. betle.

The total phenolic accumulation (TPC) at different shade levels and nitrogen rates were observed significantly different (P < 0.05) (Figure 8). The highest TPC of 1.19 mg (GAE)/g was recorded under full sunlight. The lowest TPC accumulation of 0.61 ± 0.03 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g dry weight (DW) was recorded for plants grown under 50% shade with 150 kg N/ha. Meanwhile, no variation in results was recorded in 100 kg/ha N under all levels of shade. These findings clearly indicated that the light intensity and the fertilizers application particularly nitrogen appeared a negative effect on the concentration of TPC in P. betle leaves.


Figure 8: Effect of different Nitrogen rates and shade levels on total phenolic accumulation (TPC) of P. betle.

Total flavonoids contents (TFC) concentration of P. betle was affected by the different light intensities (Figure 9). The different light intensity and rates of nitrogen had a significant effect compared with other treatment, and the effect of TF content was similar as it was observed in TP content. The results displayed that the P. betle had the highest TF (128.13 mg Quercetin/g) under 0% shade at 0 kg N/ha. Meanwhile, the lowest result (56.80 mg Quercetin/g dry weight) was noted under 50% shade with the application of 150 kg/ha N. Flavonoids are the most readily-produced phenolics in the epidermal cells of plants exposed to high light intensity. They are antioxidants, and their production is considered as a response toward protecting the plant against oxidative damage. The present studies have shown an increase in flavonoid content of various plant species grown under high light conditions compared to those in the shade or low light.


Figure 9: Effect of different Nitrogen rates and shade levels on total flavonoids contents (TFC) of P. betle.

1,1- Diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) is one of the important plant components that reported as free radicals and is mostly used for examining the preliminary radical scavenging activity of a coupon or plant extracts. The results showed that 1,1- Diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) under different shade levels and nitrogen rates had a negative effect, the result observed a highest (85.15%) under control treatment (full sunlight / 0 nitrogen rate). Meanwhile, the lowest results (22.00%) was found under 50% shade / 150 kg/ha of N. Therefore, increasing antioxidant activity (1,1- Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl DPPH) in P. betle may be related to increasing and total phenolic content and total flavonoid content accumulation.

The results regarding Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) through assay (Figures 10 and 11) showed that the ferric reducing antioxidant potential of P. betle increased with increasing the light intensity and nitrogen rates. A significant difference was observed under full sunlight treatment. According to the TF and TP results under this light intensity, synthesis of TF and TP increased. Therefore, increasing antioxidant activity in P. betle may be related to increasing TF and TP accumulation.


Figure 10: Effect of different Nitrogen rates and shade levels on 1,1-Diphenyl- 2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) of P. betle.


Figure 11: Effect of different Nitrogen rates and shade levels on Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) of P. betle.

The correlation coefficient between photosynthetic rate (PN) and stomata conductance (GS), transpiration rate (E), chlorophyll (a), chlorophyll (ab) positively was highly significant (Table 1). The relationship between (PN) and chlorophyll b was positive and significant. Meanwhile, the relationship between photosynthetic rate (PN) and total phenolics content (TPC), total flavanones content (TFC), DPPH, FRAP was negatively significant. The correlation coefficient between stomata conductance (GS) and transpiration rate (E), chlorophyll (a), chlorophyll (ab) was positively high significant and the relationship between stomata conductance (GS), and chlorophyll (b) was positively high significant. Meanwhile, the correlation coefficient between stomata conductance (GS) and total phenolics content (TPC), total flavanones content (TFC), DPPH, FRAP was negatively high significant. The correlation coefficient between transpiration rate (E) and chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll (Chl ab) was positively high significant, meanwhile the relationship between (E) and the relationship between chlorophyll b, was positively high significant (r= 0.595 P < 0.01) In addition, the correlation coefficient between (E) and total phenolics content (TPC), total flavanones content (TFC), DPPH, FRAP was negatively high significant. The correlation coefficient between chlorophyll a (Chl a) and chlorophyll b (Chl b), chlorophyll was positively significant, meanwhile the relationship between (Chl a) and total phenolics content (TPC) was negatively significant, meanwhile the correlation coefficient between (Chl a) and total flavanones content (TFC), DPPH, FRAP was negatively significant. The correlation coefficient between chlorophyll b (Chl b) and chlorophyll ab (Chl ab) was positively high significant and very strongly. Meanwhile the relationship between (Chl b) and total phenolics content (TPC), total flavanones content (TFC), DPPH, FRAP was negatively significant. The correlation coefficient between chlorophyll ab (Chl ab) and total phenolics content (TPC), total flavanones cantant (TFC), DPPH, FRAP was negatively significant. The correlation coefficient between total phenolics content (TPC) and total flavanones cantant (TFC), DPPH, FRAP was positively significant. The relationship between total flavanones cantant (TFC) and DPPH, FRAP was positively significant. The last positively and the very strong relationship was between DPPH and FRAP.

Correlations PN GS E Chl a Chl b Chl a+b TPC TFC DPPH FRAP
PN 1 - - - - - - - - -
GS .921** 1 - - - - - - - -
E .907** .957** 1 - - - - - - -
Chl a .888** .818** .869** 1 - - - - - -
Chl b .518** .623** .595** .424* 1 - - - - -
Chl a+b .830** .852** .865** .839* .848** 1 - - - -
TPC -.615** -.623** -.629** -.486** -.636** -.636** 1 - - -
TFC -.624** -.730** -.720** -.541** -.779** -.779** .850** 1 - -
DPPH -.684** -.687** -.653** -.561** -.742** -.742** .896** .833** 1 -
FRAP -.662** -.682** -.701** -.601** -.680** -.680** .884** .809** .901** 1

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
PN = Photosynthetic Rate, GS = Stomata Conductance, E = Transpiration Rate, Chl a = Chlorophyll a, Chl b = Chlorophyll b, Chl a + b = Chlorophyll a + b, TPC = Total Phenolics Content, TFC = Total Flavanones Cantante, DPPH = 1,1- Diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl, FRAP = Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power.

Table 1: Correlation coefficient between measured physiological parameters.


Rates of nitrogen and different shade levels had significant effects on chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity and secondary metabolite accumulation in P. betle plants. 30% shade with 100 kg/ ha of N showed a better growth in P. betle in term of photosynthetic rate (PN), stomata conductance (GS), transpiration rate (E), chlorophyll content. The increase in PN under different shade levels has also been previously suggested in regard to its attribution to increase GS and E [19,20].

Stomatal conductance is important in water and CO2 exchange between plants and the atmosphere. An increase in the transpiration caused by light intensity increases the amount of water that further increase the photosynthesis in the leaves. Stomatal conductance and transpiration with increasing light intensity has previously been also reported in several plants including Zingiber officinale [9,21], Orthosiphon stimaneus [22] and Tacca integrifolia [23]. An application of 100 kg/ha N had the highest chlorophyll (a) under 30% shade that showed a similar trend as net photosynthesis rate in treated plants. The results further demonstrated that the plants balance light absorption for photosynthesis by regulating the chlorophyll synthesis and in many plants, different light intensity may effect on the physiological responses at the level of leaf and chloroplast [24]. The significant result of chlorophyll (b) showed under 50 % shade at 100 and 150 kg//ha N. The results were also in agreement with the previous findings from several reports on tropical trees and conifers [25,26]. High chlorophyll content (b) in the plant grown with 100 and 150 kg/ha N (1.83, 1.76 mg/ cm2) was probably due to the release of nutrients and their beneficial effects on the soil in chemical fertilizer improvement. Compost and manure improved the physical, chemical and biological impact of soil and helped to overcome the loss of nutrients through processes. This was important in the production of healthy herbs which are to be used as natural remedies [27].

Even though the nitrogen is the most important mineral element in the process of chlorophyll biosynthesis, adding nitrogen to the soil can have negative as well as positive effects [28]. The lesser chlorophyll content in plants with 150 kg nitrogen application could be related to lesser photosynthetic electron rate (ETR) with the increase of nitrogen rate. Nitrogen concentration in green vegetation is related to chlorophyll content, and therefore indirectly to one of the basic plant physiological processes i.e. photosynthesis [26,29]. Photosynthetic rate (PN) was positively correlated with stomata conductance (GS), transpiration rate (E), chlorophyll (a). This implicated that the higher plant biomass production maybe due to higher photosynthetic rates when plants were grown 30% shade. Similar results were also reported by various researchers [30,31]. Light is one of the most extensively studied environmental factors in the phenolic metabolism [32]. Flavonoid and phenolic biosynthesis require light or enhanced by light. Flavonoid formation is absolutely light-dependent and its biosynthetic rate was related to light intensity and density [33]. The results indicated that total phenolic accumulation significantly affected by different treatments of shade 30 and 50%. The results showed that in P. betle, higher TPC was obtained under 0% shade compared with other shade 30% and 50%. Similar increased in TP with decreased shade was reported in two varieties of Zingiber officinale (cv. Halia bentong and Halia Bara; [21]. Total phenolic content in P. betle also increased but less when compared to other herbs, such as Calotropis, Hibiscus, Parthenium [34]. The result showed that there was a high relationship between TFC, DPPH, FRAP and total phenolic content TPC (P ≤ 0.01).

Previous studies have indicated that the differences in the light levels were able to change the production of secondary metabolites [35]. This simultaneously can affect the medicinal compounds in this plant Gu et al. It seemed that the different light intensity had a direct effect on antioxidant activities in plants resulting in increased total phenolics and flavonoids content [36,37]. Increasing the shade from 0% to 50% resulted in an enhancement in phenolics such as gallic acid and caffeic acid as well as flavonoid compounds such as quercetin, rutin, myricetin, kaempferol and naringin in the leaves of all three varieties of L. pumila Benth [11] Flavonoids are the most readily-produced phenolics in the epidermal cells of plants exposed to high light intensity. They are antioxidants and their production is considered as a response toward protecting the plant against oxidative damage. Studies have shown an increase in flavonoid content of various plant species grown under high light conditions compared to those in the shade. In hemlock, the concentration of various phenolics has been found to be lower in plants grown under shade than those found in full sun [38]. The result on the TFC of P. betle indicated that TF was considerably affected by the different shade levels and different shade with different nitrogen rates had significant effect on TFC. Similar trend of increasing TFC content Labisia pumila [36] increasing shade was observed in leads to an increase TFC. Decreasing shade level increases the primary photosynthate, which in phenolic concentration in the plant [39]. Light intensity provided plants with the energy required for photosynthesis and Carbon assimilation [40]. In addition, light intensity modulates several steps in phenolic metabolism, so that a higher phenolic content may be affiliated with exposure to high light intensities [41]. An elevated carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio is associated with an increased photosynthetic rate in plant tissue, which may be due to exposure to high light intensity [42]. Result showed the best levels of shade was under 30% for most morphological parameters, the concentration of various phenolics had been found lower in the plants grown under shade 30% and 50%, and the highest of it was found in full sunlight [38]. However, the different plant species are found to have different levels of sensitivity to light intensities. Bergquist et al. [43] demonstrated that the production of flavonoid concentration and composition in baby spinach under shade netting is more effective and acceptable. Most of the flavonoids are phenolic components and may be responsible for the antioxidant activity of many plants [44]. Similarly, the analyzed data showed a correlation between TFC and TPC and radical scavenging activity (DPPH) of P. betle. The 1,1- Dipheny1-2picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) plants which grown under full sunlight and containing high accumulation of TF and TP was more than from plants which were grown under 30% and 50 % shade. The plants under shade were found with low levels of TF and TP, that phenolic and flavonoid compounds act as hydrogen donors in that reaction mixture and therefore, the formation of hydroperoxides were decreased [45]. The free radical scavenging of phenolic compounds was mainly due to their redox properties, which allow them to act as reducing agents, hydrogen donors and singlet oxygen quenchers [46]. Polyphenols, tannins and flavonoids are very valuable plant constituents possessing scavenging action due to their several phenolic hydroxyl groups [47]. It seemed that the role of TP in P. betle was very important for scavenging of free radicals [36], reported the antioxidant activity of L. pumila grown under different light intensity were affected which the best antioxidant activity accumulation was under high light intensity. In the present study leave extracts of P. betle showed a good potential of antioxidant activities. Measuring of the total capacity of herbs, including FRAP assay, which we have adopted in this study. Further, the ferric reduced the antioxidant potential of P. betle that increased with increasing shade. The FRAP values for the methanolic extracts of the P. betle was lower under 30% and 50% shade. The ferric reducing ability (FRAP assay) is widely used to evaluate the antioxidant component in dietary polyphenols [48]. The FRAP activity of P. betle was significantly enhanced with increasing the light level in 0% shade. According to the TF and TP results, under full sunlight, synthesis of TF increased. Therefore, increasing antioxidant activity in P. betle related to increasing TF and TP accumulation. These findings further supported the idea positive relationship between phenolic compounds and flavonoids with antioxidant varieties of plants. However, antioxidant activity is found with phenolic compounds and especially flavonoids. Oktay et al. [48] reported strong positive relationships between total flavonoids contents and antioxidant activity, which appeared to be the trend in many plant species. Karimi et al. [36] found that higher activity with increasing total phenolics and flavonoids in all plant organs under 0% shade (sunlight) and without nitrogen (0 kg/ha N). Briskin et al. [49] also reported a significant and positive relationship between production of total phenolics and antioxidant activities in plants. It seems that different light intensities had direct effect on antioxidant activities in plant which resulted in increase total phenolics and flavonoids contents.


The significant variation in regard to photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and chlorophyll (a) was observed as these plant increased under 30% shade with 100 kg/ha of nitrogen. Plants preferred some shade or semi-shaded environmental condition. Full sunlight 0 kg/ha of N was unsuitable for the crops as the high light intensity caused scorching on leaves, and stunted in growth, accumulation of total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoids content (TFC) and antioxidant activity like 1,1-dipheny1-2picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) in the plants. P. betle had the highest accumulation of chlorophyll b and ab these increased under 50% shade with 100 and 150 kg/ha of nitrogen.


I would like to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia for the financial support and laboratory technicians in the Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture for their cooperation.


  1. Kozai T, Afreen F, Zobayed SMA (2005) Photoautotrophic (sugar-free medium) micropropagation systems for large-scale commercialization. Propagation of Ornamental Plants 5: 23-34.
  2. Mosaleeyanon K, Zobayed SMA, Afreen F, Kozai T (2005) Relationships between net photosynthetic rate and secondary metabolite contents in St. John's wort. Plant Sci 169: 523-531.
  3. Nagori K, Singh MK, Alexander A, Kumar T, Dewangan D, et al. (2011) Piper betle L.: A review on its ethnobotany, phytochemistry, pharmacological profile and profiling by new hyphenated technique DART-MS (Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry). J Pharmacy Research 4: 2991-2997.
  4. Pradhan D, Suri KA, Pradhan DK, Biswasroy P (2013) Golden Heart of the Nature: Piper betle L. J Pharmacog and Phytochem.
  5. Labrooy CD, Abdullah TL, Abdullah NAP, Stanslas J (2016) Optimum shade enhances growth and 5, 7-Dimethoxyflavone accumulation in Kaempferia parviflora Wall. ex Baker cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 213: 346-353.
  6. Kaipiainen EL (2009) Parameters of photosynthesis light curve in Salix dasyclados and their changes during the growth season. Russian J Plant Physio 56: 445-453.
  7. Igamberdiev AU, Shen T, Gardeström P (2006) Function of mitochondria during the transition of barley protoplasts from low light to high light. Planta 224: 196-204.
  8. Sreekala G, Jayachandran B (2002) Influence of shade regimes on the physiological parameters of ginger. J Spices and Aromatic Crops 11: 30-34.
  9. Ajithkumar K, Jayachandran B, Ravi V (2002) Influence of shade regimes on photosynthetic rate and stomatal characters of ginger (Zingiber officinale R.). Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops 11: 26-29.
  10. Valladares F, Wright SJ, Lasso E, Kitajima K, Pearcy RW (2000) Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81: 1925-1936.
  11. Ibrahim MH, Jaafar H, Karimi E, Ghasemzadeh A (2013) Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers application on the phytochemical and antioxidant activity of Kacip Fatimah (Labisia pumila Benth). Molecules 18: 10973-10988.
  12. Gagnon B, Berrouard S (1994) Effects of several organic fertilizers on growth of greenhouse tomato transplants. Canadian J Plant Sci 74: 167-168.
  13. Dhote S, Devi UP, Pathak AK, Goswami RB (2007) Studies on Anti-genotoxic Effect of Piper betle leaves. J Natural Remedies 7: 247-251.
  14. Mukherjee K, Paul P, Banerjee ER (2014) Free radical scavenging activities of Date Palm (Phoenix sylvestris) fruit extracts. Nat Prod Chem Res 2: 151.
  15. Rintu D, Kaustab M, Pramathadhip P (2015) Anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of different varieties of Piper leaf extracts (Piper betle L.). Nutr Food Sci 5: 1-15.
  16. Braca A, Tommasi ND, Bari LD, Pizza C, Politi M, et al. (2001) Antioxidant principles from bauhinia t arapotensis. J Natural Products 64: 892-895.
  17. Firuzi O, Lacanna A, Petrucci R, Marrosu G, Saso L, et al. (2005) Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of flavonoids by “ferric reducing antioxidant power” assay and cyclic voltammetry. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects 1721: 174-184.
  18. Shivashankara K, Mithila J, Maiti S (2000) Effect of different light intensities on growth and yield of betelvine (Piper betle L.). J Plantation Crops 28: 196-200.
  19. Dai Y, Shen Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Hannaway D, Lu H, et al. (2009) Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environmental and Experimental Botany 65: 177-182.
  20. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZE, Rahmat A, Wahab PEM, Halim MRA (2010) Effect of different light intensities on total phenolics and flavonoids synthesis and anti-oxidant activities in young ginger varieties (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Inter J Molecular Sci 10: 3885-3897.
  21. Ibrahim MH, Jaafar HZ (2012) Primary, secondary metabolites, H2O2, malondialdehyde and photosynthetic responses of Orthosiphon stimaneus Benth to different irradiance levels. Molecules 17: 1159-1176.
  22. Abdullah T, Misrol L, Zulhilmi M, Johnson S, Aziz A, et al. (2014) Effect of shade and morphological characterization of Janggut Adam (Tacca sp.) as a promising native ornamental and medicinal plant. Transanction of the Malaysian Society of Plant Physiology 22: 13-15.
  23. Bailey S, Walters RG, Jansson S, Horton P (2001) Acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to the light environment: the existence of separate low light and high light responses. Planta 213: 794-801.
  24. Khan SR, Rose R, Haase DL, Sabin TE (2000) Effects of shade on morphology, chlorophyll concentration, and chlorophyll fluorescence of four Pacific Northwest conifer species. New forests 19: 171-186.
  25. Almaliotis D, Therios I, Karatassiou M (1996) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on growth, leaf nutrient concentration and photosynthesis in three peach cultivars. International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops.
  26. Hassan SA, Mijin S, Yusoff UK, Ding P, Wahab PE,   et al. (2012) Nitrate, ascorbic acid, mineral and antioxidant activities of Cosmos caudatus in response to organic and mineral-based fertilizer rates. Molecules 17: 7843-7853.
  27. Bojović B, Stojanović J (2006) Some wheat leaf characteristics in dependence of fertilization. Kragujevac J Sci 28: 139-146.
  28. Haboudane D, Millera JR, Tremblay N, Tejada PJZ,  Dextraz L, et al. (2002) Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment 81: 416-426.
  29. Basra SM, Iqbal S, Afzal I (2014) Evaluating the response of nitrogen application on growth, development and yield of quinoa genotypes. Inter J Agriculture & Bio 16: 886-892.
  30. Pan J, Guo B (2016) Effects of light intensity on the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, and flavonoid content of Epimedium pseudowushanense BL Guo. Molecules 21: 1475.
  31. Ghasemzadeh A, Ghasemzadeh N (2011) Effects of shading on synthesis and accumulation of polyphenolic compounds in ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) varieties. J Medicinal Plants Res 5: 2435-2441.
  32. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZ, Rahmat A (2011) Effects of solvent type on phenolics and flavonoids content and antioxidant activities in two varieties of young ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) extracts. J Medicinal Plants Res 5: 1147-1154.
  33. Gu XD, Sun MY, Zhang L, Fu HW, Cui L, et al. (2010) UV-B induced changes in the secondary metabolites of Morus alba L. leaves. Molecules 15: 2980-2993.
  34. Karimi E, Jaafar HZE, Ghasemzadeh Ali, Ibrahim MH (2013) Light intensity effects on production and antioxidant activity of flavonoids and phenolic compounds in leaves, stems and roots of three varieties of Labisia pumila Benth. Australian J Crop Sci 7: 1016.
  35. Ingersoll CM, Niesenbaum RA, Weigle CE, Lehman JH, et al. (2010) Total phenolics and individual phenolic acids vary with light environment in Lindera benzoin. Botany 88: 1007-1010.
  36. Zobel A, Clarke P (1999) Production of phenolic compounds in seedlings of Acer saccharum and Acer platanoides in response to UV-A radiation and heavy metals. Allelopathy J 6: 21-34.
  37. Warren JM, Bassman JH, Fellman JK, Mattinson DS, Eigenbrode S (2003) Ultraviolet-B radiation alters phenolic salicylate and flavonoid composition of Populus trichocarpa leaves. Tree Physiology 23: 527-535.
  38. Johkan M, Shoji K, Goto F, Hashida SN, Yoshihara T (2010) Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. Hort Science 45: 1809-1814.
  39. Parr AJ, Bolwell GP (2000) Phenols in the plant and in man. The potential for possible nutritional enhancement of the diet by modifying the phenols content or profile. J Science of Food and Agric 80: 985-1012.
  40. Miller A, Cramer M (2005) Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation, in Root Physiology: from Gene to Function. Springer pp: 1-36.
  41. Bergquist SÅ, Gertsson UE, Nordmark LYG, Olsson ME (2007) Ascorbic acid, carotenoids, and visual quality of baby spinach as affected by shade netting and postharvest storage. J Agric and Food Chem 55: 8444-8451.
  42. Miliauskas GP, Venskutonis PR, Van Beek TA (2004) Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food Chem 85: 231-237.
  43. Gebicka L, Banasiak E (2009) Flavonoids as reductants of ferryl hemoglobin. Acta Biochim Pol 56: 509-513.
  44. Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL (2005) The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric and Food Chem 53: 1841-1856.
  45. Saboonchian F, Jamei R, Sarghein SH (2014) Phenolic and flavonoid content of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.  (leaf and flower). Avicenna J Phytomed 4: 231.
  46. Oktay M, Gülçin I, Küfrevioğlu OI (2003) Determination of in vitro antioxidant activity of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) seed extracts. LWT-Food Sci and Tech 36: 263-271.
  47. Briskin DP, Gawienowski MC (2001) Differential effects of light and nitrogen on production of hypericins and leaf glands in Hypericum perforatum. Plant Physiology and Biochem 39: 1075-1081.
Citation: Muttaleb QA, Abdullah TL, Hassan SA, Rashid AA, Taheri S, et al. (2018) The Role of Shade and Nitrogen on Physiological Traits and Secondary Metabolites of Piper betle L. J Hortic 5: 230.

Copyright: © 2018 Muttaleb QA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top globaltechsummit