GET THE APP

The Neotropical Genus Austrolebias: An Emerging Model of Annual Killifishes
Cell & Developmental Biology

Cell & Developmental Biology
Open Access

ISSN: 2168-9296

+44 20 3868 9735

Review Article - (2014) Volume 3, Issue 2

The Neotropical Genus Austrolebias: An Emerging Model of Annual Killifishes

Nibia Berois1, Maria J. Arezo1 and Rafael O. De Sa2*
1Departamento de Biologia Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay
2Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA
*Corresponding Author: Rafael O. De Sa, Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA, Tel: 804-2898542, Fax: 804-289-8233 Email:

Abstract

Annual fishes are found in both Africa and South America occupying ephemeral ponds that dried seasonally. Neotropical annual fishes are members of the family Rivulidae that consist of both annual and non-annual fishes. Annual species are characterized by a prolonged embryonic development and a relatively short adult life. Males and females show striking sexual dimorphisms, complex courtship, and mating behaviors. The prolonged embryonic stage has several traits including embryos that are resistant to desiccation and undergo up to three reversible developmental arrests until hatching. These unique developmental adaptations are closely related to the annual fish life cycle and are the key to the survival of the species. Most of the available data on Neotropical annual fishes derive from studies on the genus Austrolebias. Herein, we review and summarize the available data on the evolution, reproduction strategy, developmental biology and conservation status of these Neotropical fishes.

Background

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) have become widely used fish models because they are oviparous, exhibit long breeding periods, transparency of eggs and embryos, and they are relatively easy to maintain in the laboratory [1,2]. Strikingly different to those model organisms is a group of teleost for which Myers [3] used the term ‘annual fishes’. Annual fishes are found in ephemeral pools of water in Africa and Neotropical regions and complete their life cycle within a year at the end of which they die leaving behind fertilized eggs that typically survive in the soil and hatch during the next rainy season.

Neotropical annual killifishes share the general features of the widely used teleost models mentioned above. However, they are unique in having a very short lifespan, up to 9 months from hatching to death [4]. Ecologically, they are exposed to an extremely variable environment inhabiting ephemeral ponds; these habitat conditions lead to the annual death of the entire adult population.

Life in seasonal and ephemeral aquatic habitats presents numerous challenges. Among vertebrates, the African (Protopterus) and South American (Lepidosiren) lungfishes, face seasonal habitat dry outs. Protopterus avoids desiccation and aestivates during the dry season by burrowing in the mud and forming a cocoon over its entire body, except the mouth [5,6], whereas Lepidosiren do no form cocoon and aestivates in burrows [7]. Among teleosts, the African and Asian clariids catfishes survive dry season by burying in soft sand or in burrows with water-air interface [8]. Burrowing and relatively impermeable cocoons have also been reported in salamanders and anurans; these cocoons consist of accumulation of multiple layers of shed-keratinized skin detached from, but that remains enveloping, the individual. The North American salamander genus Siren inhabits seasonally drying swamps. They survive dry periods by burying in the mud and forming cocoons [9-12]. Among frogs inhabiting deserts or environments with prolonged dry season, cocoon formation evolved independently and has been reported in distantly related genera of North America (e.g., Scaphiopus), Australia (e.g., Cyclorana, Neobatrachus), Africa (e.g., Pyxicephalus, Leptopelis), and South and Central America (e.g. Ceratophrys, Lepidobatrachus, Smilisca) [13-20].

Neotropical annual killifishes are members of the diverse freshwater family Rivulidae (Cyprinodontiformes, Aplocheiloidei) distributed from Mexico and the Caribbean Islands to Southern Argentina [21] and includes both species with annual and non-annual life-history strategies. Within this family, two major clades have been recognized: Cynolebiatinae and Rivulinae [22-24]. The maintenance over evolutionary time of an annual life cycle is coupled with inherently related adaptations in embryonic development, ecological, and behavioral traits [23]. The most striking difference between non-annual and annual killifishes is that the later exhibit arrest development (a diapausing egg). Annualism evolved independently in the African family Aplocheilidae [24]. However, the single or multiple evolution of annualism in Rivulidae is not fully resolved [25,26]. The most recent analyses provide support for two independent origins of annualism in the Rivulidae [27]. Furthermore, 1) the evolution of annualism seems to be favored by the prolonged development of cyprinodontiform eggs and species occurrence in geographical “harsh” environmental conditions [27], and 2) annual species exhibit a noticeable increase in the molecular rate of base substitutions relative to non-annual rivulids [26].

Most of the information on the evolutionary and developmental biology available for the Neotropical annual killifishes derives from studies on the genus Austrolebias Costa, 1998; a genus consisting of 39 currently recognized species and distributed across South-Eastern South America [25,28].

Herein, we reviewed different aspect of the evolutionary biology of the annual fishes with emphasis in the genus Austrolebias.

Life cycle

Throughout the rainy season, adults of Austrolebias inhabit flooded small and medium size temporal pond found in grasslands habitats. These ponds are shallow (50-100 cm deep) with a surface of about 100-500 m2, have aquatic vegetation, turbid water, and soft muddy substrates. Adults are found in the fall, winter and spring months, when the ponds are flooded. They engage in elaborate courtship behaviors that result in the male and female burying in the substrate. While buried they lay desiccation-resistant eggs. These eggs will survive the disappearance of the ponds during the dry season (Figure 1). In the subsequent rainy season, once the ponds are flooded, most eggs hatch. Consequently, the embryos spend their life buried in the mud. Neotropical annual killifish grow fast after hatching and reach sexual maturity fast in about 8-12 weeks and a new reproductive cycle begins [29-32]. In contrast with Neotropical species, most of the African annual species, Nothobranchius, lay their eggs on the surface of the substrate and reach sexual maturity earlier in about 4 weeks [33].

cell-developmental-biological-cycle

Figure 1: Habitat (ephemeral pond) and biological cycle of annual fishes. (A) Environment during the wet season with flooded ponds when the adults reproduce. Dimorphic colorations of Austrolebias charrua male and female are shown. (B) Environment during the dry season, ponds have disappeared and only embryos remain in the substrate in a pre-hatching state of diapause III. An embryo in this stage and of the same species is shown.

Courtship, mating, and sexual selection

Annual fish life occurs in geographical isolated, discrete, and relative small populations. Consequently, they provide unique opportunities to study mating behavior and in particular to examine the role of sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, male competition, and female choice. Differences, even small ones, in any of these traits have a significant impact on reproductive success. Reproductive isolation would then reinforce their geographical isolation resulting in rapid speciation in this clade of annual fishes.

Striking sexual dimorphism has been reported for several species of rivulids fish and most Neotropical annual killifishes. In Austrolebias, males are usually larger than females. A recent study demonstrated that intra- and intersexual selection on male body size favors larger size in males of A. charrua [34]. Moreover, while females are overall brownish with sparse darker dots on body and fins, males display bright coloration, particularly on the opercular region, unpaired fins, and body flanks. The coloration ranges from bright dots, sometimes disperse over the body flanks and fins (e.g., A. affinis), dispersed over the body flanks and arranged as horizontal bands on dorsal and ventral fins (e.g., A. nigrippinis), to body flanks with distinct vertical bright bands (e.g., A. charrua). Whereas tail fins in Austrolebias can range from dots scattered over the entire fin to a line of dots close to the edge of the rounded fin and a few other dots scattered over the surfaces of the fins. A recent study suggested that that ancestral coloration for both sexes of killifishes was relatively plain [35].

Male coloration plays a crucial role in male reproductive success and male displays are used both in male-male interactions as well as courtship of females. Early courtship studies described a pattern of male displays in A. bellottii, A. nigripinnis, A. viarius, A. luteoflammulatus, and A. cheradophilus [29,36]. These displays consist of an overall pattern of six behavioral units: 1) males fully extend and vibrate dorsal, ventral, and anal fins in front of the females; 2) male quick bursts of swimming alternating with sudden stops or shift on direction; 3) male placing himself in a 45-90 degree angle with the substrate, sometimes introducing the snout into the substrate; throughout these early steps male coloration intensifies. After a while, 4) the female aligns and contacts with the side of the male; 5) the mating couple then buries themselves in the substrate by means of strong movements of the dorsal, ventral, and anal fins; 6) the pair remains buried for variable periods of time, up to 45 seconds, and the individuals emerge from the substrate at separate times and places. This basic behavioral pattern (with the addition and/or modification of behavioral units/displays) has been reported for other species (e.g., A. cyaneus, A. nigripinnis, and A. charrua) [37]. More elaborate analyses of the sequence of behavioral units, as well as frequency and duration of male and female behavioral units were reported for A. reicherti [38]. Undoubtedly, these elaborate and sequentially structured courtships play a role in species recognition and as barriers to hybridization that are evolutionary critical given that more than one species occur sympatrically in the small and ephemeral pools. Indeed, a recent study [38] suggested that the high conservancy in the sequence of courtship displays among species of Austrolebias is involved in avoiding hybridization. Moreover, a recent study demonstrates that A. reicherti responds to chemical cues of potential mates and suggest that chemical cues are essential in the muddy ponds in which this species reproduces [39].

Little is known, particularly under wild conditions, about the natural history and biology of annual Neotropical killifishes, data such as life span, diet, growth rate, egg production, life cycle, and ecology are scarce. This is particularly the case for the genus Austrolebias where the available data is limited to: A. adloffi [40,41], A. bellottii [42,43], A. viarius [44,45], A. cheradophilus [45], A. luteoflammulatus [45], A. nigrofasciatus [46], A. toba [47], A. reicherti [38], A. vandenbergi [48,49], and A. quirogai [50].

Reproduction and sexual strategy

Different sexual strategies are found among teleost fishes. Diversity ranges from gonochorism (testes and ovaries in separate individuals) to hermaphroditism (functional male and female tissues in the same individual) [51]. The only data referring to sex differentiation pattern were reported for A. charrua. According to Yamamoto’s [52] classification, this species corresponds to ‘differentiated gonochoric’ pattern where the early gonads directly develop into an ovary or a testis without intermediate stages [32]

Austrolebias shows a high reproductive potential. After hatching, most species analyzed reach sexual maturity in 8–12 weeks [29,53]. Under laboratory conditions, females spawn daily for about 32 weeks until senescence. Similar data were reported for Cynopoecilus melanotaenia [54].

Previous studies have shown that in most gonochoric teleosts sex differentiation occurs during post-hatching stages and earlier in females than males [55,56]. The first, and up to now only, histological study about sex differentiation and gametogenesis in annual fishes were reported for A. charrua [32]. This histological study reported germ cells proliferation in presumptive ovaries before hatching, demonstrating that sex differentiation occurs at pre-hatching stages. This is a remarkable difference with most non-annual gonochoric fish species where sex differentiation has been reported at various post-hatching stages [56]. However, sex differentiation before hatching has also been suggested for two closely related non-annual fishes Oryzias latipes (Beloniformes) and Gambusia affinis (Cyprinodontiformes) [57,58].

Gamete morphology and fertilization

Fish oocytes develop within the ovarian follicle (oocyte surrounded by follicular cells) and are released during ovulation [59]. The oocyte is surrounded by the vitelline envelope (eggshell, zona pellucida, zona radiata or chorion) that is found between the oocyte and the follicular cells. This structure is deposited in successive layers concomitant with vitellogenesis [60,61]. Teleost fishes, as well as insects and cephalopods, have a special structure in the form of a narrow channel-like structure, the micropyle, which perforates the chorion at the animal pole [62]. This funnel-shaped structure is the only site for the male gamete entry and it is formed during the deposition of the egg envelope. Furthermore, the micropyle opening has taxonomic and systematic value since it shows morphological differences among species and sperm attraction to its opening is species specific [60,62]. The teleost oocyte envelope has been shown to be a sensitive biomarker to adverse pollutants. Furthermore, changes in the organization of egg envelope and in its proteins synthesis have been reported as a consequence of aquatic contaminants (particularly xenoestrogens) [63,64].

Austrolebias oocytes exhibit the general characteristics of other telolecithal eggs (i.e., large amount of yolk, nucleus in the animal pole and just below the micropyle). However Austrolebias’ egg envelope is thicker, a feature that may contribute to prevent dehydration during dry season. In addition, the envelope surface of annual fishes is ornamented with filaments of different sizes, thickness, and distribution patterns among species [32,65,66] (Figure 2A). In freshwater fishes in general [67], and annual fishes in particular [65,68], the ornamentation of the egg envelope is species-specific and a potential source of taxonomic and phylogenetic information.

cell-developmental-Austrolebias-charrua

Figure 2: (A) SEM of the egg’s envelope of Austrolebias charrua , the micropyle is visible at the center of the photograph (corresponding to the animal pole). (B) Spermatozoa of A. charrua , note the round head, the collar of mitochondria in the neck, and the lateral fins of the tails.

As other teleosts with external fertilization, annual fishes have a typical uniflagellate anacrosomal aquasperm [69]. At scanning microscopy level, the sperm shows a spherical head, a midpiece containing a single row of round mitochondria, and one flagellum. The flagellar tail could have two, three, or four short lateral fins along almost the entire length (Figure 2B). Teleost fertilization exhibits distinct characteristics from those of other vertebrates and even other “fish” groups. Sperm interaction only occurs at the micropyle of the egg envelope. Since teleost sperm lacks acrosome, there is no acrosome reaction during fertilization. Once near the micropyle, fish spermatozoa show direct movement toward the micropyle opening [70]. Furthermore, this attraction is mediated by a glycoprotein (lectin based) found on the surface of the chorion and its removal result in a reduction of fertilization rate [62]. The sperm fuses to the oocyte cell membrane underlying the micropyle [71]. Therefore, in the cell membrane of both gametes lies the key to species-specificity. Consequently, the ultrastructure of egg envelope, micropyle, and sperm head features are considered in phylogenetic analyses and pre-zygotic isolation among closely related species. Studies of egg envelope ornamentation patterns, sperm morphology, sperm-micropyle attraction in Austrolebias are limited or absent. Available studies on related species, A. reicherti and A. charrua, support the idea that these taxa have emerged from recent cladogenetic events [72,73]; these species could then be a good species- pair model to study these traits.

Analyses of Zona Pellucida (ZP) gene sequences of teleost fishes have demonstrated the presence of two classes of genes that encode ZP proteins and are further distinguished by their expression in the liver, ovary, or both depending on the species. The ancestral condition for vertebrates is to have ovary expression of ZP genes [74,75]. In annual fishes, ZP genes have been identified in A. charrua, (achzpL and achzpH,) both expressed in the liver. The deduced amino acid sequences showed identity values between 65 to 80 % with ZPs from species belonging to a variety of fish groups (Fundulus heteroclitus, Oryzias latipes, Sparus aurata, and Danio rerio) [61].

Embryo development

Annual fishes diverge from other teleosts in two aspects related to their unique developmental pattern [3]. Epiboly is temporally and spatially detached from organogenesis and the embryos undergo one or more reversible arrests (diapauses). These developmental arrests can occur at three different stages: Diapause I during epiboly, Diapause II halfway through somite stage, and Diapause III at pre-hatching stage [66,76-78]. These unique developmental adaptations are closely related to their life cycle and ecological requirements to survive in temporal subtropical and tropical environments.

As described above, egg laying and fertilization in Neotropical annual fishes occurs while the adults are within the substrate. Through meroblastic cleavage, that follow the general teleost pattern, a discoidal blastoderm forms on the animal pole and three other distinct populations of cells can be distinguished: 1) a yolk syncytial layer, where the cleavage nuclei share a common cytoplasm [79,80], 2) a population of deeper cells, and 3) the enveloping multinuclear layer, an outmost layer of big and flat cells that surround and protect the embryo [76].

Teleost gastrulation begins when deep cells move and meet forming the embryo and at the same time epiboly of the enveloping multinuclear layer and yolk syncytial layer occur. Conservation in synchronicity of epiboly and convergence (presence of germ ring) during gastrulation has been shown in comparative studies of early development in several teleost species [81]. The first unique trait of annual fish development occurs during mid-late blastula stage (the dispersed phase) (Figure 3A): deep cells disperse over the entire syncytial layer concomitantly with epiboly of the other two cell populations [66,76,77] The triangular or rhomboidal deep cells progressively migrate toward the vegetal pole. The number of cells at early epiboly, compared with the typical teleost is quite low in all species of annual fishes analyzed [77]. For example, A. viarius has about 100 migrating deep cells [66] whereas in Danio rerio there are about 4000 migrating cells in this early stage [1]. The reaggregation phase occurs after dispersion when deep cells converge over the surface forming an aggregate (Figure 3B). The early reaggregate is one-cell thick but progressively the cells become tightly packed forming a discoidal plate several cells thick [66,76,77,82]. This plate is evocative of the blastodisc of amniotes during gastrulation. Interesting is that, at this stage, the axis of the embryo appears at the middle of the reaggregated plate by mechanisms that remain to be determined. Is the pattern of gastrulation in annual fishes different from the general teleost pattern or is a derived one? A study of early gastrulation in typical teleosts (Salmo, Salvelinus) [83] described a series of changes in the adhesiveness and motility of deep cells. The study reported that, at late blastula stage, these cells separate from one another and randomly migrates. Thus, at the beginning of gastrulation, an incipient dispersed phase has been reported as a general teleost feature and we could consider it a precursor of the dispersed stage of annual fishes. Furthermore, these authors established two overall patterns for teleost development that may contribute to understand the dispersion–reaggregation phases in annual fishes: 1) embryogenesis solely involves the deep cells and 2) the first multicellular structure that forms during embryogenesis (the ‘nubbin’), considered to be equivalent to the prechordal plate, results from the localized ‘accumulation’ (aggregation) of previously ‘disengaged’ (dispersed) deep cells [83]. Similar observations were reported for medaka (Oryzias latipes) [84]. Based on these reports, the departure in the annual fish pattern with distinctly defined dispersed and reaggregation stages could be explained as extensions of the incipient processes previously described in typical teleosts [4].

cell-developmental-reaggregation-phases

Figure 3: Dispersion and reaggregation phases in Austrolebias charrua . (A) Dispersion phase: geometric-shaped deep cells are observed progressively separating each other. (B) Reaggregation phase: the rounded deep cells confluent towards one point (area marked by the square) (Nomarski (DIC) microscopy).

Subsequent processes of axis formation, somitogenesis, and organogenesis in annual fishes development are similar to those of other teleosts. However, compared with typical teleosts the overall duration of embryo development in annual fishes has been documented to be longer, lasting between 40 to 320 days post-fertilization [78]. Considering that temperature influences the duration of development, temperature variation could explain time differences in developmental rate. In the African Nothobranchius guentheri, an increase of 5 °C resulted in a reduction of 10 days in development [85]. The duration of early embryonic development of two Neotropical annual fishes was compared with three phylogenetically close (Atherinomorpha series) non-annual teleosts: Cyprinodontiformes (Fundulus heteroclitus), Atheriniformes (Odontesthes bonariensis) and Beloniformes (Oryzias latipes) (Table 1) [86].

  viarius (25°C) myersi (25°C) F.heteroclitus 20°C O.latipes (26°C) O.bonariensis (19°C)
Cleavage 24 h 7 h 10 h 5 h 15 min 7,5 h
Blastula formation 72 h 20 h 24 h 8 h 15 min 8,5 h
Epiboly 168  h 44-48 h 40 h 21 h 38 h
Reaggregation 288 h 216 h      
Embryonic axis 312 h 228 h 37 h 21 h 29 h
Somitogenesis (0-10 pairs) 384 h 264 h 56 h 39 h 53 h

Table 1: Comparison of early development duration among annual fishes, Austrolebias viarius [67], Austrofundulus myersi [77] and non-annual fish Fundulus heteroclitus , Oryzias latipes [2], and Odontesthes bonariensis ; culture temperature for each species is noted.

Diapauses

Unique among vertebrates are the developmental arrests or diapauses of variable length that characterized annual fishes development (Figure 4). Furthermore, these could be facultative or obligatory depending on different genera. For example, in Austrolebias, Diapauses I and II are facultative whereas Diapause III is obligatory [78]. This fact has been described in A. nigripinnis [87], A. bellotti [78], A. viarius [66] and A. charrua [66] in embryos cultured under standardized laboratory conditions. In Austrofundulus, Diapause I is facultative but Diapause II and III are obligates [78,88]. Considering the possible combinations among the stages, diapauses can offer eight different developmental pathways to the timing of an embryo trajectory. From an ecological perspective, these possibilities allow the annual fishes to adjust to an unpredictable environment [78].

cell-developmental-annual-fish

Figure 4: Diapauses (D) and their placement during the development of an annual fish from fertilization to hatching. The images correspond to embryos of Austrolebias charrua and represent the following events: dispersion (D I), somite embryo (D II), and pre-hatching embryo (D III).

Diapause I, which occurs during the dispersed stage of late blastula, has been interpreted as an early control mechanism imposed by the environment over the developmental pathway [77]. A study in the African Nothobranchius, reported that this stage was induced by chemical signals produced by adult fishes [89]. However, the polar hydrophilic substance responsible for this developmental arrest remains unknown [90].

Diapause II (that occurs at 35-40 somites stage) occurs in advanced embryos undergoing organogenesis [76,78]. Most of the available data about this stage are on the northern South American genus Austrofundulus. Previous studies [88,91,92] have shown that A. limnaeus shows: 1) depressed metabolism during diapause II, 2) most metabolic heat dissipation is due to anaerobic processes, 3) great tolerance to anoxia and the presence of a heat shock protein, and 4) cells are in a G0-like stage of the cell cycle. A study working with the same species explored the role of steroid hormones during Diapause II and showed that treatment of embryos with exogenous E2 induced the increase of the “escape embryos” (embryos that bypass diapauses II in this case) [93]. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that an age related decrease in maternal E2 is correlated with a decrease in the number of escape embryos. Therefore, steroid hormonal signaling seem to be involved in the regulation of diapauses II and progression of development in A. limnaeus.

Diapause III occurs at the pre-hatching stage when the embryo is almost ready to hatch. This stage precisely coincides with the variable duration of the dry season. The overall metabolism of diapause III embryos is lower when compared with those at the same stage that are induced to hatch [88,94]. The resistance to desiccation seems to be related to the ability of embryos to reduce evaporative water loss in A. limnaeus [95,96].

Some non-annual Cyprinodontiformes are able to delay hatching under particular environmental conditions. The non-annual killifish Fundulus heteroclitus usually has continuous development and it’s spawning and hatching coincides with high tide cycles in the coastal marshes that inhabits [97]. However, developing embryos exposed to air showed an accelerated developmental rate, whereas embryos show delay hatching when the eggs are completely submerged under water [98]. Furthermore, these authors found that levels of an aquaporin protein were reduced in air-exposed embryos and suggest that this class of proteins may play a role in water balance. Recently, a study reported that in embryos of F. heteroclitus exposed to air more than 800 genes were differentially expressed. Furthermore, these genes show transcriptional characteristics of ‘stress’ response proteins [99]. In this context, Diapause III could be considered as the addition of the extended delayed hatching as an attribute in annual fish development [78,97].

Conservation status

Most annual fish species, including Austrolebias, are threatened to extinction mainly due to habitat degradation and climate change. Ponds are being altered by different human activities [100]. As a response to this situation, for example, in Brazil the “National Action Plan for the Conservation of Threatened Extinction Killifishes” was recently created. The main objective of this effort is to establish mechanisms to protect and prevent the extinction of rivulids species and loss of their habitats in Brazil [101]. There is high conservation concern for this group of fishes since they are included under the “Critically Endangered” category of Rio Grande do Sul and Brazil [51,101]. In this context, knowledge about the biology and culture techniques of endangered species is essential to support conservation plans, population management, and restocking. Moreover, these studies also offer biological and methodological data to support the maintenance of brood stocks of this important biological model for laboratory studies [100]. In Uruguay in 2013, thirty-three species of Austrolebias were included in the SNAP (Sistema Nacional de Areas Protegidas) [102]

Final considerations

As summarize above, Austrolebias and other annual Neotropical killifishes have unique developmental adaptations that are closely related to the life cycle that make annual fishes a useful model for comparative, developmental, and evolutionary studies. However, in Austrolebias there are many questions that remain to be explored. It has been shown that this genus has specific courtship patterns and sexual selection is important during mating. Courtship has been described for a handful of species that limits our understanding of the role of specific behavioral units in this group. Furthermore, the role of sexual selection on the evolution of male characteristics and speciation has not been tested. Does sexual selection has a stronger evolutionary role in Austrolebias than in other freshwater fishes? Given their annual cycle and that populations inhabit geographical isolated ephemeral pond, one would anticipate a high role of sexual selection in morphological evolution and speciation. No study is available on the sperm-micropyle attraction as a prezygotic isolating mechanism in Austrolebias.

Field studies are needed to understand the natural history of most species; available ecological and population data as well as diet, growth and other phenomenological data is limited. This information would help to understand the dynamics of sympatric populations living in ephemeral ponds. A few studies have suggested the systematic value of the ornamentation of the chorion; however, the ecological role of this ornamentation has not been addressed.

Undoubtedly, the annual cycle and diapausing egg in this group is one of the most fascinating aspects of their developmental biology as one of the most extreme pathways during early development of a vertebrate. Annual fish diapauses are a kind of dormancy stages and an evolutionary innovation that functions as a survival strategy to inhabit harsh environments. These special stages show reduction or suspension of metabolic activities until environmental conditions become favorable. Considering that facultative and obligatory diapauses are of variable duration, sibling eggs can produce embryos that develop and hatch at different times, which in itself could provide an evolutionary advantage for the survival of the species. In this way asynchrony is increased and with it the ability of the organism to face a very unpredictable environment. The recent studies on non-annual killifish suggested that aquaporin proteins, as well as hundreds of other stress-like proteins, may play a role in water conservation during desiccation periods. No studies of gene expression have been done in annual killifishes to understand the molecular basis of annualism. The amazing biology of annual fish exemplifies one of the most extreme events of alternate developmental pathways during early development of a vertebrate.

Currently, studies on the evolutionary biology, ethology, reproductive strategies, regulation of developmental pathways, and senescence on several species of Austrolebias are in progress by different interdisciplinary and international research groups. These approaches should contribute to understand the complexity of annual fishes at the developmental, functional, evolutionary levels.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge financial support from Facultad de Ciencias, PEDECIBA (Programa de Desarrollo de Ciencias Básicas), CSIC (Comisión Sectorial de Investigación, Universidad de la República), ANII (Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación), and NSF-DEB 1144692.

References

  1. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. DevDyn. 203: 253-310.
  2. Iwamatzu T (2004) Stages of normal development in the medakaOryziaslatipes. Zool. Sci. 11: 605-618.
  3. Berois N, Arezo MJ, Papa NG, Clivio GA (2012) Annual fish: developmental adaptations for an extreme envir onment. Wiley Interdiscip Rev DevBiol 1: 595-602.
  4. Smith HE 1930. Metabolism of the lung fish Protopterusaethiopicus. J BiolChem 88: 97-30.
  5. Johensl AG, Svensson GSO (1954) On the biology of Protopterusannectens. Ark Zool 7: 131-164.
  6. Giusti H, Sanchez AP, do Carmo JM, Glass ML. (2008) Aestivation in the South American lungfish, Lepidosirenparadoxa: Effects on cardiovascular function, blood gases, osmolarity and leptin levels. RespPhysiolNeurobiol 164: 380-385.
  7. Bruton MN, (1979) The survival of habitat dessication by air breathing clariid catfishes. EnvBiol Fish 4: 273-280.
  8. Reno HWF, Gehlbach R, Turner RA (1972) Skin and aestivational cocoon of the aquatic amphibian, Siren intermedia Le Conte. Copeia 4: 625-31.
  9. Gehlbach FR, Gordon R, Weems WA (1973) Aestivation of the salamander, Siren intermedia. Am Midl Nat 89: 455-463.
  10. Etheridge K (1990a) The energetics of estivating sirenid salamanders (Siren lacertian and Pseudobranchusstriatus). Herpetologica 46: 407-14.
  11. Etheridge K (1990 b) Water balance in estivating sirenid salamanders (Siren lacertina). Herpetologica 46: 400-406.
  12. Ruibal R, Hillman S (1981) Cocoon structure and function in the burrowing hylid frog, Pternohylafodiens. J Herpetol 15: 403-408.
  13. Shoemaker VH, McClanahan LL, Ruibal R (1969) Seasonal changes in body fluids in a field population of spadefoot toads. Copeia 585-591.
  14. Withers P C (1995) Cocoon formation and structure in the aestivating Australian desert frogs, Neobatrachus and Cyclorana. Aust J Zool 43: 429-441.
  15. Cartledge VA, Withers PC, McMaster KA, Thompson GG, Bradshaw SD (2006) Water balance of field-excavated aestivating Australian desert frogs, the cocoon-forming Neobatrachusaquilonius and the non-cocooning Notadennichollsi (Amphibia-Reptilia). J ExperBiol 209: 3309-3321.
  16. Loveridge JP, Craye G (1979) Cocoon formation in two species of southern African frogs. S Afr J Sci 75: 18-20.
  17. Grafe R U (2000) Leptopelisviridis (West African tree frog). Cocoon formation. Herpetol. Rev 31: 100-101.
  18. McDiarmid RW, Foster MS (1987) Cocoon formation in another hylid frog, Smiliscabaudinii. J Herpetol 21: 352-55.
  19. McClanahan LL, Shoemaker VH, Ruibal R (1976) Structure and function of the cocoon of a ceratophryd frog. Copeia 179-185.
  20. Parenti LR (1981) Discussion In: Nelson G, Rosen DE, eds. Vicariance Biogeography: A Critique. New York: Columbia University Press 490-497.
  21. Costa WJEM (1990) Análisefilogenética da familiaRivulidae (Cyprinodontiformes, Aplocheiloidei). Rev Brazil Biol 50: 65-82.
  22. Costa WJEM (1998) Phylogeny and classification of Rivulidae revisited: origin and evolution of annualism and miniaturization in rivulids fishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei). J ExpZool A Comp ExpBiol 3: 33-92.
  23. Murphy WJ, Thomerson JE, Collier GE (1999) Phylogeny of the Neotropical killifish family Rivulidae (Cyprinodontiformes, Aplocheiloidei) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. MolPhylogenetEvol 13: 289-301.
  24. Costa WEJM (2006) The South American annual killifish genus Austrolebias (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae): phylogenetic relationships, descriptive morphology and taxonomic revision. Zootaxa 1213: 1-162.
  25. Murphy WJ, Collier GE (1997) A molecular phylogeny for aplocheiloid fishes (Atherinomorpha, Cyprinodontiformes): the role of vicariance and the origins of annualism. MolBiolEvol 14: 790-799.
  26. Hrbek T, Larson A (1999) The evolution of Diapause in the killifish family Rivulidae (Atherinomorpha, Cyprinodontiformes): A molecular phylogenetic and biogeographic perspective. Evolution 53: 1200-1216.
  27. Loureiro M, Duarte A, Zarucki A (2011) A new species of Austrolebias Costa (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) from northeastern Uruguay, with comments on distribution patterns. NeotropIchthyol 9: 335-342.
  28. Vaz-Ferreira R, Sierra B, Scaglia S (1964) Eco-etología de la reproducción en los peces del géneroCynolebiasSteindachner, 1876. Apartados de los Archivos de la Sociedad de Biología de Montevideo 26: 44-49.
  29. Wourms JP (1964) Comparative observations on the early embryology of Nothobranchiustaeniopygus and Aplocheilicthyspumilis with special reference to the problem of naturally occurring embryonic diapause in teleost fishes. Annual Report East African Freshwater Fisheries Institute 68-73.
  30. Wourms JP (1967) Annual fishes In: Wilt FH, Wessels N, eds. Methods in Developmental Biology. New York: Thomas and Crowell Company 123-137.
  31. Arezo MJ, D'Alessandro S, Papa N, de Sá R, Berois N (2007) Sex differentiation pattern in the annual fish Austrolebiascharrua (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Tissue Cell 39: 89-98.
  32. Haas R (1976a) Behavioral biology of the annual killifish, Nothobranchiusguentheri. Copeia II 80-91.
  33. Passos C, Tassino B, Loureiro M, Rosenthal GG (2013) Intra- and intersexual selection on male body size in the annual killifish Austrolebiascharrua. Behav Processes 96: 20-26.
  34. Sedlácek O, Baciaková B, Kratochvíl L (2014) Evolution of body colouration in killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheilidae, Nothobranchiidae, Rivulidae): Is male ornamentation constrained by intersexual genetic correlation? ZoologischerAnzeiger 253: 207-215.
  35. Vaz-Ferreira R, Sierra B (1972) Los géneros de Cyprinodontidae de aguastemporalessudamericanas. Boletín de la SociedadZoológica del Uruguay 2: 36-42.
  36. Belote DF, Costa WJEM (2004) Reproductive behavior patterns in three species of the South American annual fish genus Austrolebias Costa, 1998 (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Nova Serie Rio de Janeiro 514 :1-7.
  37. García D, Loureiro M, Tassino B (2008) Reproductive behavior in the annual fish Austrolebiasreicherti Loureiro &García 2004 (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae). NeotropIchthyol 6: 243-248.
  38. Passos C, Reyes F, Tassino B, Rosenthal GG, González A (2013) Female annual killifish Austrolebiasreicherti (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae) attend to male chemical cues. Ethology 119: 891-897.
  39. Liu RL, Walford RL (1965) Husbandry, life span, and growth rate of the annual fish Cynolebiasadloffi E. Ahl. ExpGerontol 1: 161-167.
  40. Liu RK and Walford RL (1966) Increased growth and life-span with lowered ambient temperature in the annual fish, Cynolebiasadloffi. Nature 212: 1277-1278.
  41. Liu RK, Walford RL (1969) Laboratory studies on the life-span, growth, aging, and pathology of the anual fish CynolebiasbellottiiSteindachner. Zoologica 54: 1-16.
  42. Simpson BRC (1979) The phenology of annual killifishes. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 44: 243-261.
  43. Errea A, Danulat E (2001) Growth of the annual fish, Cynolebiasviarius (Cyprinodontiformes) in the natural habitat compared to laboratory conditions. Environ Biol Fishes 61: 261-268.
  44. Laufer G, Arim M, Loureiro M, Piñeiro-Guerra JM, Clavijo-Baquet, et al. (2009) Diet of four annual killifishes: an intra and interspecific comparison. NeotropIchthyol 7: 77-86.
  45. Volcan MV, Lanes LEK, Goncalves AC (2009) Threatened fishes of the world: Austrolebiasnigrofasciatus Costa and Cheffe 2001 (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae). Environ Biol Fish 86: 443-444.
  46. Calvino RC (2005) Austrolebiastoba (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae), unaespecienueva de pezanual de la Argentina. Rev MusArgentino de Cienc Nat 7: 188-190.
  47. Montaña CG, Schalk CM, Taphorn DC (2012) First record of Van den Berg’s Pearlfish, Austrolebiasvandenbergi Huber, 1995 (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) in Bolivia with comments on its diet and reproductive biology. Check List 8: 589-591.
  48. Schalk MC, Montaña CG, Libson ME (2014) Reproductive strategies of two Neotropical killifish, Austrolebiasvandenbergi and Neofundulusornatipinnis (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) in the Bolivian Gran Chaco. Rev Biol Trop 62: 109-117.
  49. Volcan MV, Goncalves AC, Lanes LEK (2014) Austrolebiasquirogai (Actinopterygii: Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) in Brazil: ocurrence, population parameters, habitat characteristics and conservation status. ActaIchthyologica et piscatoria 44: 37-44.
  50. Devlin RH, Nagahama Y (2002) Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208: 191-364.
  51. Yamamoto T (1969) Sex differentiation. In: Hoar,W.S., Randall, D.J. (Eds.) Fish Physiology, vol III. Academic Press, New York 117-175.
  52. Volcan MV, Sampaio LA, Bongalhardo DC, Robaldo RB (2013) Reproduction of the annual fish Austrolebiasnigrofasciatus (Rivulidae) maintained at different temperaturas. J Appl. Ichthyol 29: 648-652.
  53. olcan MV, Sampaio LA, Bongalhardo DC, Robaldo RB (2013) Reproduction of the annual fish Austrolebiasnigrofasciatus (Rivulidae) maintained at different temperaturas. J Appl. Ichthyol 29: 648-652.
  54. Arenzon A, Carvalho A, Camino, MB (1999) Reproduction of the annual fish Cynopoecilusmelanotaenia (Regan, 1912) in a temporary water body in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae). Hydrobiologia 411: 65-70.
  55. Nakamura M, Kobayashi T, Chang X-T, Nagahama Y (1998) Gonadal sex differentiation in teleost fish. J ExpZool 281: 362-372.
  56. Strüssmann CA, Nakamura M (2002) Morphology, endocrinology, and environmental modulation of gonadal sex differentiation in teleost fishes. Fish PhysiolBiochem 26: 13-29.
  57. Hamaguchi S (1982) A light- and electron-microscopic study on the migration of primordial germ cells in the teleost, Oryziaslatipes. Cell Tissue Res 227: 139-151.
  58. Koya Y, Fujita A, Niki F, Ishihara E, Miyama H (2003) Sex differentiation and pubertal development of gonads in the viviparous mosquitofish, Gambusiaaffinis. ZoologSci 20: 1231-1242.
  59. Wallace R, Selman K (1981) Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. American Zoologist 21: 325-343.
  60. Guraya SS (1986) The cell and molecular biology of fish oogenesis. MonogrDevBiol 18: 1-223.
  61. Berois N, Arezo MJ, Papa NG (2011) Gamete interactions in teleost fish: the egg envelope. Basic studies and perspectives as environmental biomonitor. Biol Res 44: 119-124.
  62. Yanagimachi R, Cherr G, Matsubara T, Andoh T, Harumi T, et al. (2013) Sperm attractant in the micropyle region of fish and insect eggs. BiolReprod 88: 47.
  63. Arukwe A, Knudsen FR, Goksøyr A (1997) Fish zonaradiata (eggshell) protein: a sensitive biomarker for environmental estrogens. Environ Health Perspect 105: 418-422.
  64. Arukwe A, Goksøyr A(2003) Eggshell and egg yolk proteins in fish: hepatic proteins for the next generation: oogenetic, population, and evolutionary implications of endocrine disruption. Comp Hepatol 2: 4.
  65. Loureiro M, de Sá RO (1996) External morphology of the chorion of the annual fishes Cynolebias (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Copeia 1996: 1016-1022.
  66. Arezo MJ, Pereiro L, Berois N (2005) Early development in the annual fish Cynolebiasviarius. J Fish Biol 66: 1357-1370.
  67. Johnson EZ,Werner RG (1986) Scanning electron microscopy of the chorion of selected freshwater fishes. J Fish Biol 29: 257-265.
  68. Wourms JP, Sheldon H (1976) Annual fish oogenesis. II. Formation of the secondary egg envelope. DevBiol 50: 355-366.
  69. Jamieson BGM (1991) Fish Evolution and Systematics: Evidence from Spermatozoa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  70. Amanze D, Iyengar A (1990) The micropyle: a sperm guidance system in teleost fertilization. Development 109: 495-500.
  71. Hart NH (1990) Fertilization in teleost fishes: mechanisms of sperm-egg interactions. Int Rev Cytol 121: 1-66.
  72. García G, Loureiro M, Berois N, Arezo MJ, Casanova G, et al. (2009) Pattern of differentiation in the annual killifish genus Austrolebias (Cyprinodontiformes:Rivulidae) from a biosphere reserve site in South America: a multidisciplinary approach. Biol J Linn SocLond 98: 620-635.
  73. Conner SJ, Hughes DC (2003) Analysis of fish ZP1/ZPB homologous genes--evidence for both genome duplication and species-specific amplification models of evolution. Reproduction 126: 347-352.
  74. Conner SJ, Lefièvre L, Hughes DC, Barratt CL (2005) Cracking the egg: increased complexity in the zonapellucida. Hum Reprod 20: 1148-1152.
  75. Wourms JP (1972) Developmental biology of annual fishes. I. Stages in the normal development of Austrofundulusmyersi Dahl. J ExpZool 182: 143-167.
  76. Wourms JP (1972) The developmental biology of annual fishes. II. Naturally occurring dispersion and reaggregation of blastomers during the development of annual fish eggs. J ExpZool 182: 169-200.
  77. Wourms JP (1972) The developmental biology of annual fishes. 3. Pre-embryonic and embryonic diapause of variable duration in the eggs of annual fishes. J ExpZool 182: 389-414.
  78. Kimmel CB, Law RD (1985) Cell lineage of zebrafishblastomeres. II. Formation of the yolk syncytial layer. DevBiol 108: 86-93.
  79. Trinkaus JP (1993) The yolk syncytial layer of Fundulus: its origin and history and its significance for early embryogenesis. J ExpZool 265: 258-284.
  80. Trinkaus JP (1984) Mechanism of Fundulus epiboly: a current view. Am Zool 24: 673-688.
  81. Carter CA, Wourms JP (1991) Cell behavior during early development in the South American annual fishes of the genus Cynolebias. J Morphol 210: 247-266.
  82. Ballard WW, Dodes LM (1968) The morphogenetic movements of the lower surface of the blastodisc in Salmonid embryos. J ExpZool 168: 76-84.
  83. Yokoya S (1966) Cell dissociation and reaggregation in early stage embryo of a teleost Oryziaslatipes. Sci Rep. Tohoku UnivSer 32: 229-236.
  84. Markofsky J, Matias JR (1977) The effects of temperature and season of collection on the onset and duration of diapause in embryos of the annual fish Nothobranchiusguentheri. J ExpZool 202: 49-56.
  85. Setiamarga DHE, Miya M, Yamanoue Y, Mabuchi K, Satoh TP, et al. (2008) Interrelationships of Atherinomorpha (medakas, flyingfishes, killifishes, silversides, and their relatives): The first evidence based on whole mitogenome sequences. MolPhylog. Evol 49: 598-605.
  86. Peters N (1963) EmbryonaleAnpassungenoviparerZahnkarpfenausperiodischaustrocknendenGewassern. Int Rev gesHydrobiol 48: 257-313.
  87. Podrabsky JE, Hand SC (1999) The bioenergetics of embryonic diapause in an annual killifish, austrofunduluslimnaeus J ExpBiol 202 : 2567-2580.
  88. Denucé JM (1989) Developmental changes in annual fish embryos kept in the proximity of adult fishes. ActaEmbryolMorpholExp 10: 87-94.
  89. Inglima K, Perlmutter A, Markofsky J (1981) Reversible stage-specific embryonic inhibition mediated by the presence of adults in the annual fish Nothobranchiusguentheri. J ExpZool 215: 23-33.
  90. Podrabsky JE, Lopez JP, Fan TW, Higashi R, Somero GN (2007) Extreme anoxia tolerance in embryos of the annual killifish Austrofunduluslimnaeus: insights from a metabolomics analysis. J ExpBiol 210: 2253-2266.
  91. Meller CL, Meller R, Simon RP, Culpepper KM, Podrabsky JE (2012) Cell cycle arrest associated with anoxia-induced quiescence, anoxic preconditioning, and embryonic diapause in embryos of the annual killifish Austrofunduluslimnaeus. J Comp Physiol B 182: 909-920.
  92. Pri-Tal BM, Blue S, Pau FK, Podrabsky JE (2011) Hormonal components of altered developmental pathways in the annual killifish, Austrofunduluslimnaeus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 174: 166-174.
  93. Levels PJ, Gubbels RE, Denucé JM (1986) Oxygen consumption during embryonic development of the annual fish Nothobranchiuskorthausae with special reference to diapause. Comp BiochemPhysiol A Comp Physiol 84: 767-770.
  94. Podrabsky JE, Carpenter JF, Hand SC (2001) Survival of water stress in annual fish embryos: dehydration avoidance and egg envelope amyloid fibers. Am J PhysiolRegulIntegr Comp Physiol 280: R123-131.
  95. Podrabsky J., Tingaud-Sequeira A., Cerdà J. (2010) Metabolic dormancy and responses to environmental desiccation in fish embryos. En: Dormancy and Resistance in Harsh Environments (Lubzens E, Cerdà J., Clark M., eds). Topics in Current Genetics, Springer, The Netherlands 21: 203-226.
  96. Taylor MH (1999) A suite of adaptations for intertidal spawning. Am Zool 39: 313-320.
  97. Tingaud-Sequeira A, Zapater C, Chauvigne F, Otero D, Cerda J (2009) Adaptive plasticity of killifish (Fundulusheteroclitus) embryos: dehydration-stimulated development and differential aquaporin-3 expression. Am J PhysiolRegulIntegr Comp Physiol 296: 1041-1052.
  98. Tingaud-Sequeira A, Lozano JJ, Zapater C, Otero D, Kube M, et al. (2013) A rapid transcriptome response is associated with desiccation resistance in aerially-exposed killifish embryos. PLoS One 8: e64410.
  99. da Fonseca AP, Volcan MV, Sampaio LA, Romano LA, Robaldo RB (2013) Growth of critically endangered annual fish Austrolebiaswolterstorffi (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) at different temperatures. NeotropIchthyol 11: 837-844.
  100. ICMBio, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2012) Sumárioexecutivo do plano de açãonacionalpara a conservação dos peixesRivulídeosameaçados de extinção. Brasília.
Citation: Berois N, Arezo MJ, De Sa RO (2014) The Neotropical Genus Austrolebias: An Emerging Model of Annual Killifishes. Cell Dev Biol 3:136.

Copyright: © 2014 Rafael O De Sa, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.