Journal of Ergonomics
Open Access

The Future of Workplace Ergonomics in the Era of Hybrid Work

Feng Xili^{* *}Correspondence: Feng Xili, Department of Ergonomics, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China, Email:

Author info »

Description

The landscape of work has undergone a profound transformation, with hybrid work models becoming increasingly prevalent across industries worldwide. This shift presents unique challenges and opportunities for the field of ergonomics [1]. As practitioners in this domain, we must reconsider traditional approaches to workplace design and employee well-being across environments that now span both corporate and domestic spaces. The traditional office environment offered ergonomists a relatively controlled setting to implement best practices. Corporate wellness programs could monitor adherence to ergonomic principles, and workplace assessments could identify and mitigate physical stressors. The hybrid model, however, introduces variability that demands a more nuanced approach to ergonomic intervention [2].

Home workspaces often lack the ergonomic considerations built into modern office designs. Many employees work from kitchen tables, couches, or improvised setups that fail to support proper posture. A recent survey found that 68% of remote workers reported experiencing new or worsened musculoskeletal pain since transitioning to home-based work, with over 40% attributing these issues directly to inadequate workspace configuration [3-5]. The financial and logistical barriers to creating ergonomically sound home offices present a significant challenge, particularly for employees with limited space or resources.

The psychological dimensions of ergonomics also warrant closer examination. The boundaries between professional and personal life have become increasingly porous, with many workers reporting difficulty disconnecting from work responsibilities. This cognitive ergonomic challenge manifests in extended work hours, decreased recovery time, and heightened stress levels. Unlike physical ergonomic factors, these psychological stressors require interventions that address work culture, communication patterns, and individual behavior [6].

Organizations have responded with varying degrees of effectiveness. Some have implemented stipends for home office equipment, contracted with ergonomics consultants for virtual assessments, or developed digital tools to remind employees about posture and movement. Others have revised policies around working hours to protect employees' rest periods [7]. However, these initiatives often fail to account for the dynamic nature of hybrid work, where employees may transition between multiple workspaces throughout the week.

A complete approach to hybrid work ergonomics requires integration across several domains. First, organizations must develop ergonomic literacy among their workforce, equipping employees with knowledge to identify and address basic ergonomic issues independently [8]. This education should extend beyond physical workspace considerations to include temporal aspects of work and cognitive ergonomics. Second, the ergonomics community must embrace technological solutions that can scale across diverse environments [9]. Artificial intelligence and sensing technologies offer promising avenues for personalized intervention, such as computer vision applications that analyze posture in real-time or wearable devices that track movement patterns. Third, regulatory frameworks must evolve to address the unique challenges of hybrid work. Current occupational health and safety regulations typically focus on employer-controlled environments, creating ambiguity regarding responsibility for ergonomic conditions in home workspaces [10]. Fourth, ergonomics research must expand to capture the longitudinal impacts of hybrid work patterns. Most existing studies examine either office-based or home-based work in isolation, failing to account for the cumulative effects of transitioning between environments with different ergonomic profiles.

Conclusion

The hybrid model also presents opportunities to reimagine ergonomics as a driver of workplace well-being rather than simply a risk mitigation strategy. When employees have greater autonomy over their work environments, they may be more receptive to ergonomic principles that align with their personal preferences. This shift from compliance-oriented to engagementoriented ergonomics could enhance productivity, creativity, and job satisfaction. For practitioners, this evolution requires developing new assessment methodologies and intervention approaches. Traditional evaluations must be adapted for virtual delivery, incorporating coaching elements to empower employees as active participants in ergonomic problem-solving.

References

1. Espinosa-Leon JP, Alvarez GG, Azocar RJ. Optimizing ergonomics in the operating room: A vital factor for anesthesia care. J Clin Anesth. 2024;97:111548.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Gabrielson AT, Mukherjee A, Alam F, Hallet J. Incorporating ergonomics into surgical checklist workflows. Am J Surg. 2025;5:116281.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Sanchez-Escudero JP, Aguillon D, Valencia S, Garcia-Barrera MA, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Trujillo N. Digital ergonomics of navegapp, a novel serious game for spatial cognition assessment: Content validity and usability study. JMIR Serious Games. 2025;13:e66167.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Chen H, Anton N, Holden RJ, Yu D. Kitchen ergonomics in health and healthcare: A rapid scoping review. Hum Factors Healthcare. 2024;5:100069.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

5. Eklund J. Development work for quality and ergonomics. Appl Ergon. 2000;31(6):641-648.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Saurin TA, Patriarca R, Hegde S, Rayo M. Digital technologies and resilient performance in socio-technical systems: A human factors and ergonomics perspective. Appl Ergon. 2025;123:104420.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Aguilar KN, Smith ML, Payne SC, Zhao H, Benden M. Digital human ergonomics training for remote office workers: Comparing a novel method to a traditional online format. Appl Ergon. 2024;117:104239.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Venkateswaran S, Wang D, Potter AL, Yang CF. Safety and optimizing ergonomics for cardiothoracic surgeons. Thorac Surg Clin. 2024;34(3):197-205.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Hamilton BC, Dairywala MI, Highet A, Nguyen TC, O'Sullivan P, Chern H, et al. Artificial intelligence based real-time video ergonomic assessment and training improves resident ergonomics. Am J Surg. 2023;226(5):741-746.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Gualtieri L, Fraboni F, Brendel H, Pietrantoni L, Vidoni R, Dallasega P. Updating design guidelines for cognitive ergonomics in human-centred collaborative robotics applications: An expert survey. Appl Ergon. 2024;117:104246.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]