Roles of Iroquois Transcription Factors in Kidney Development
Cell & Developmental Biology

Cell & Developmental Biology
Open Access

ISSN: 2168-9296

+44 7868 792050

Review Article - (2014) Volume 3, Issue 1

Roles of Iroquois Transcription Factors in Kidney Development

Amanda N. Marra and Rebecca A. Wingert*
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA, E-mail:
*Corresponding Author: Rebecca A. Wingert, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA, Tel: 574-631-0907, Fax: 574-631-7413 Email:


Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) affect 1/500 live births. CAKUT lead to end stage renal failure in children, and are associated with high morbidity rates. Understanding the mechanisms of kidney development, and that of other associated urogenital tissues, is crucial to the prevention and treatment of CAKUT. The kidney arises from self-renewing mesenchymal renal stem cells that produce nephrons, which are the principal functional units of the organ. To date, the genetic and cellular mechanisms that control nephrogenesis have remained poorly understood. In recent years, developmental studies using amphibians and zebrafish have revealed that their simple embryonic kidney, known as the pronephros, is a useful paradigm for comparative studies of nephron ontogeny. Here, we discuss the new found roles for Iroquois transcription factors in pronephric nephron patterning, and explore the relevance of these findings for kidney development in humans.


Introduction to Kidney Ontogeny and Composition

Kidney development in vertebrates is an elaborate process that involves the formation and progressive degradation of up to three kidney forms known as the pronephros, mesonephros, and metanephros [1]. Each kidney form is architecturally more complex than its predecessor, but each form nevertheless consists of fundamentally similar structural and functional units known as nephrons [1]. The nephrons perform essential regulatory roles in the body, collecting metabolic waste for urinary excretion and working to maintain water homeostasis [2].

The pronephros, mesonephros, and metanephros kidney forms carry out renal functions to varying degrees during the different stages of development and adult life of vertebrate species. In higher vertebrates like birds, reptiles, and mammals, the pronephros is a vestigial organ with little to no function. In these animals, the mesonephros functions transiently during the gestation stages as the metanephros takes shape, then degrades when the developed metanephros becomes functional. In lower vertebrates like fish and amphibians, however, the pronephros is fully functional during embryonic and/or juvenile stages, and the mesonephros is the final kidney to form and serves as the adult organ. Across species, the number and arrangement of nephrons present in each kidney form differs widely. Pronephros kidney forms tend to be anatomically simple, and contain the fewest number and simplest arrangements of nephrons. In contrast, mesonephros and metanephros kidney structures contain increased nephron endowments and more complicated branching or otherwise arborized arrangements of the nephrons around a drainage system.

Nephrons in all of these vertebrate kidney structures are comprised of three conserved parts: a blood filter, tubule, and duct [2]. Each nephron part is made up of several highly specialized epithelial cell types [2]. The blood filter prevents circulatory cells (e.g. erythrocytes and leukocytes) and large proteins from entering the nephron tubule, but does not discriminate among low molecular weight metabolites that will pass into the tubule [2]. The tubule is organized into a series of discrete proximal, intermediate and distal segments that carry out unique jobs, and in turn each of these segment regions consists of differentiated cells with unique ultrastructural and molecular features when compared to neighboring regions [2]. The functions of the tubule encompass the reabsorption and/or secretion of glucose, amino acids, and various salts, which ultimately preserves essential nutrients from excretion and maintains a stable internal environment [2]. Finally, the duct transports the urine out of the kidney, and the cells that comprise the duct perform fine-tuning of electrolytes through the reabsorption of salt and water [2]. Various cell types in the nephron and cells located in the interstitial space between nephrons additionally work to produce and secrete hormones that control blood pressure and hematopoiesis, such as renin and erythropoietin [3].

The integrity of kidney nephrons is absolutely essential for normal renal function in vertebrates, and the abrogation of nephron functionality leads to various forms of kidney disease [4]. How kidney cells are made during development is hypothesized to hold the key for how replacement renal cells might be generated through regenerative medicine to treat kidney disease [5,6]. Currently, there is a growing incidence of acute and chronic kidney diseases [3,4]. There is also great medical significance in understanding kidney formation, as kidney development defects are relatively common. Congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) affect 1/500 children when they are born, and represent 20-30% of prenatal anomalies [7,8]. The defects within the clinical spectrum of CAKUT are incredibly diverse, and include (i) agenesis, or failure of the kidneys to form, (ii) hypoplasia, the formation of kidneys that are reduced in size and/or overall nephron number, and (iii) dysplasia, in which the kidney is comprised of abnormal structures such as cystic nephrons [7-10]. Identifying the key genes that control different aspects of kidney development can be used to determine the origins of CAKUT conditions.

Animal Models of Nephron Development

There have been tremendous strides in understanding early events in renal development through the genetic analysis of mammalian kidney development using the mouse model system, as briefly discussed in the following section [11]. However, the mechanisms of nephron development, particularly how segmental domains emerge during nephrogenesis, have remained poorly understood with a small number of signals and molecular targets identified to date [8,12-14]. The striking commonalities of nephron composition and excretory tasks that exist amongst species have become increasingly appreciated in recent years [15,16]. These observations have spurred a burgeoning interest and expansion in basic research efforts to study the developmental biology of renal stem cells by utilizing diverse vertebrate models [15,16]. In fact, several in vertebrates models have been utilized as well, including the Drosophila fruit fly and the nematode C. elegans, which further highlights the amazing degree of conservation among excretory cell types across the phylogenetic tree [15,16].

Of relevance for this review, the pronephros in both the frog Xenopus laevis and the zebrafish Danio rerio have emerged as useful systems to delineate the mechanisms of nephron segmentation, largely based on new-found appreciation for the cellular and molecular similarities shared between nephrons in these species and mammals [17,18]. Further, the relatively simple anatomy of these pronephros kidneys facilitates nephrogenesis analysis (Figure 1). Several recent studies have identified roles for the Iroquois (Irx) transcription factor Irx3 in the proximodistal segmentation of the vertebrate nephron using the frog [19] and zebrafish pronephros [20]. Here, we provide a brief overview of renal lineage development to set the stage for a detailed discussion of Irx gene form and function in nephron pattern formation. We discuss the series of findings that have established crucial roles for Irx3 in pronephros segment patterning based on several studies in frog and zebrafish embryos. Finally, we discuss the relevance of these findings to mammalian metanephros nephrogenesis.


Figure 1: Pronephros development in the zebrafish. (A) The renal progenitor field emerges from the intermediate mesoderm (IM) which arises between the paraxial mesoderm (PM) and the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM). (B) The renal progenitor fields give rise to a pair of bilateral nephrons that are comprised of a series of discrete cell types. (Images adapted from [18] with author rights).

Setting the Stage: An Overview of Renal Lineage Specification and Patterning in Vertebrates

As previously discussed, kidneys across species utilize nephrons as their basic structural and functional building block regardless of the architectural variations between kidney types. During ontogeny, renal lineages derive from the intermediate mesoderm (IM) in the embryo. To date, the early events in kidney specification have been extensively characterized through genetic studies in the murine metanephric kidney [3,11]. In mammals, IM cell type specification involves the activity of several transcription factors, including Osr1, Eya1, Pax2, though the precise relationships between these and other genes is still an active area of investigation [11]. IM specification leads to emergence of two major lineages: the so-called nephric duct and a population of Metanephric Mesenchyme (MM) cells that will undergo complex interactions to form the metanephros [3,11]. Formation of the nephric duct involves many genes, among them Pax2/8 and Lhx1 [11]. Essential transcription factors that support MM development include Osr1, Pax2, Wt1 and several Hox genes [11]. The MM becomes delineated into sub-compartments that include vascular progenitors, a stromal progenitor population, and a population of renal stem cells [11]. Stromal progenitors are identified based on their expression of Foxd1, and give rise to cell types located in the interstitial space between nephrons [11]. Renal stem cells that express Six2 and Cited1 undergo proliferation and self-renewal, and their offspring produce nephrons through an intricate process termed nephrogenesis.

Nephrogenesis is initiated when a cluster of renal stem cell offspring, or renal progenitors, aggregates and undergoes a mesenchymal to epithelial transition, forming a renal vesicle (RV) [3,11]. The RV is a hollow structure that elongates through further cell proliferation and undergoes morphogenesis to become the nephron tubule [3]. The RV will lengthen into a comma-shaped body, followed by an S-shaped body before finally transitioning into a complete nephron [3]. Nephrogenesis also involves the specification and pattern formation of renal progenitors into the many different cell types found in each nephron [12-14]. This segmentation of the nephron and the subsequent proper differentiation of the many specialized epithelial is crucial for normal renal development. While several transcription factor genes and signaling pathways have been identified as essential components in nephron cell lineage development, the cast of players is considered incomplete and the mechanisms of nephron patterning remain poorly understood [12-14]. Several recent studies have implicated important nephrogenesis roles for a member of the irx gene family, Irx3, which are discussed in the subsequent sections of this review.

Overview of the Irx Gene Family

The Iroquois (known both as Iro/Irx) genes are a conserved family of homeo-domain transcription factors that are well known for their roles in the tissue patterning and cell type specification [21,22]. The Irx genes were discovered in Drosophila in a screen to identify factors responsible for the patterning of sensory structures, such as the bristles located on the thorax of the fly [23,24], and include a cluster of three genes known as araucan, caupolican, and mirror [21]. Since this time, they have been assigned a broad number of roles in the organization of cell types in both invertebrates and vertebrates. For example, studies have demonstrated that Irx genes are required to pattern tissues such as the eye primordium of Drosophila [25], the vertebrate brain [26], spinal cord [27], and heart [28]. Irx factors can act as transcriptional activators and repressors [21,22]. In vertebrates such as Xenopus and the mouse there are six members of the Irx family divided in two clusters: cluster A (Irx1, Irx2 and Irx4) and cluster B (Irx3, Irx5 and Irx6) [29,30]. Teleost fish, likely due to a genome duplication event that occurred after the divergence of teleosts from tetrapods, possess more Irx genes. Thus far, a total of 10 Irx genes were reported in puffer fish (Fugu rubripes, Tetraodon nigroviridis), and 11 have been detected in the zebrafish [31].

Discovery that Irx3 is Essential for Pronephros Segmentation in the Frog

The frog has been used historically as a powerful model to delineate the embryological mechanisms involved in organ induction [32,33]. The discovery that the frog pronephros contained proximodistal segmentation that likened it to the segmented mammalian nephron led to the further application of the Xenopus model to interrogate segmentation mechanisms [34]. Several reports noted the expression of Irx genes in the frog kidney [35] and mouse kidney [36], but the function of this family of genes in the kidney went unexplored until a group led by Reggiani, et al. hypothesized that Irx genes may direct nephron patterning [19].

To explore their hypothesis, Reggiani, et al., first surveyed Irx gene expression during Xenopus pronephros development [19]. The Xenopus pronephric nephron contains four major tubule segments known as the proximal early tubule (PE), proximal late tubule (PL), distal early (DE) and distal late tubule (DT), which is followed by a duct [34]. Based on the analysis of gene expression patterns, the segments have also been proposed to be more elaborate—i.e. to be further sub-compartmentalized [19,37]. In the more elaborate schema, the proximal tubule is further organized into three segments, rather than two: PT1, PT2 and PT3 [19,37]. In addition, an intermediate tubule with two different regions, the IT1 followed by IT2, is proposed to sit between the proximal and distal segments [19,37]. These segments can be highlighted using combinations of mammalian kidney gene orthologs, such as the solute carrier (Slc) family of genes [19,37].

Gene expression analyses revealed that several Irx genes were regionally expressed in renal progenitors during nephrogenesis [19]. During pronephric nephron development in Xenopus, Irx expression is highly specified and confined to the central region. Notably, three specific Irx factors are present during frog pronephros development: Irx1, Irx2, and Irx3 [19]. Interestingly, Irx3 expression is specific to the PT3, IT1 and IT2 nephron segments as early as stage 25 of the developing embryo [19]. The expression of Irx3 appears before both Irx1 and Irx2, which are subsequently expressed solely in the IT1 [19]. The expression of Irx3 in Xenopus begins to decline at stage 35/36 [19]. However, Irx1 and Irx2 expression remains strong [19].

To determine the role(s) of these Irx genes, Reggiani, et al. performed a series of loss of function studies using antisense morpholinos (MO) [19]. For each Irx gene in question, two distinct MOs were used [19]. All six Irx-MOs were proven to inhibit Irx mRNA translation in a concentration-dependent fashion [19]. Also, each Irx-MO was specific to its Irx gene target [19]. For example, the two Irx3-MOs did not affect Irx1 or Irx2 translation [19].

Next, Reggiani et al. evaluated nephron segment pattern in the pronephros through knockdown experiments utilizing Irx-targeting MOs into single V2 blastomeres of 8-cell stage embryos [19]. At this stage, it has been documented that MOs can target the prospective pronephric anlage [38]. After injection, the embryos were examined for physical abnormalities as well as for marker gene expression within the pronephros region via in situ hybridization. Simultaneous knockdown of Irx1, Irx2 and irx3 resulted in embryos with clear developmental defects [19]. One significant defect was the unilateral shortening of the body axes, which precluded the analysis of possible pronephric phenotypes [19]. Thus, the simultaneous loss of Irx1, Irx2 and irx3 promoted abnormal development of the embryo as a whole. However, loss of Irx1 or Irx2 alone, or the combination of Irx1 and Irx2 together, had no physical affect on development, or on the expression of pronephric marker genes [19]. Conversely, injection of an irx3- MO resulted in developmental defects specific to the pronephric kidney of the majority of the embryos assayed [19]. Further, a second independent morpholino, irx3 (2)-MO, produced similar phenotypes [19]. Interestingly, a small fraction of both the irx3-MO and irx3 (2)-MO injected embryos had complete pronephric kidney loss accompanied by other developmental malformations [19].

In the irx3-Mo injected embryos that appeared to have a normal phenotype, in situ analysis was done to probe for evidence of defects in nephron organization [19]. In these irx3 knockdowns, Pax2 expression revealed the presence of pronephric kidneys, indicating that the specification of the pronephric fate had occurred during gastrulation [19]. However, the majority of the embryos possessed defects in the intermediate tubule, characterized by abnormal morphology of the looped central domain [19]. Staining for segment markers showed the loss of IT1 and IT2, as well as decreased size of the PT3 [19]. Embryos injected with irx3 (mp)-MO, a control, demonstrated no expression loss of any segment markers [19]. Interestingly, irx3 knockdown also resulted in a loss of both Irx1 and Irx2 expression in the PT3, IT1 and IT2 segments [19]. However, irx3 knockdown did not alter pronephric terminal differentiation, nor did it affect the expression of irx3 in the same embryos when allowed to age [19].

To determine if irx3 specifies intermediate tubule fate, Reggiani et al. performed gain of function experiments [19]. To do this, irx3 mRNA was injected into either one blastomere of two-cell-stage embryos or the V2 blastomere of eight-cell-stage embryos [19]. The embryos were raised to the stage 39 and evaluated for the presence of the IT and DE marker Slc12a1 via in situ hybridization [19]. About half of the injected embryos demonstrated developmental defects as serious as abnormal neural tube closure [19]. In about 10% of the embryos that showed no phenotypical defects, the formation of ectopic Slc12a1-expressing tubule tissues was seen [19]. These ectopic tissues were solely located in the intermediate mesoderm posterior to the pronephric kidney, suggesting that irx3 over expression is only able to promote the change of intermediate mesoderm to IT/DE tubule tissue [19].

Taken together, these studies established that irx3 function is essential for segmentation in the amphibian pronephros, and that irx3 is required to induce the expression of Irx1 and Irx2 [19]. Together, all three of these genes are important for patterning of the pronephric kidney. Several intriguing questions about the frog pronephros have not yet been resolved. The expression of irx3 is clearly confined to the central region of the developing pronephric nephron, but it is difficult to explicitly define irx3 expression to the intermediate tubule from this study [19]. The Slc markers used to outline the intermediate and DE pronephric segments largely overlapped. Thus while it is convincing that irx3 marking the tubule regions downstream of the proximal segments, the existence of the intermediate tubule would be strengthened if specific intermediate tubule markers could be identified. Notably, the same research group reported a large panel of 112 pronephros markers subsequent to the Irx study [37]. This collection contains a number of intriguing markers that show expression in unique combinations of nephron regions, including Cldn8 in the proposed IT2 segment [37]. However, only one IT1 marker, Kcnj1, was reported in this study, and this transcript is also expressed throughout the distal tubule and collecting duct [37]. Additional IT markers have not been reported to date. Nevertheless it would be intriguing to assay whether irx3 gain of function also triggers the ectopic expression of Cldn8 and/or Kcnj1, as evidence of such a finding could be used to further identify the cell type(s) that irx3 promotes.

In a subsequent 2008 study from Alarcon, et al., Irx1 and Irx3 were found to be requisite to maintain the identity of the territory that gives rise to the pronephros [38]. Gain or loss of Irx function during neurula stages led to the expansion or reduction of the pronephros field [38]. These findings suggest that Irx gene activity in amphibians is crucial to maintain the size of the IM field that produces the embryonic kidneythus highlighting an early role for Irx activity prior to the events of nephron segmentation. If and how this finding relates to mammalian renal lineage specification has not yet been the subject of further investigation.

Irx3 Function in Distal Tubule Segmentation in the Zebrafish Pronephros

Studies in zebrafish have suggested that one irx3 paralog, irx3b, plays a role in segmentation through regulating segment boundaries and ensuring distal segment differentiation [20]. Over the last several decades, the zebrafish has steadily emerged as a powerful model organism for developmental genetics [39,40]. A landmark study first described the zebrafish embryo pronephros, demonstrating that it was comprised of two nephrons similar to the Xenopus embryo, but instead possessed an integrated blood filter that was more structurally reminiscent of the mammalian blood filter [41]. The nephrons in the zebrafish nephron were subsequently discovered to possess a segmental composition [17,18], with at least eight different cell types that included a series of proximal and distal segments (Figure 1). Among the tubule segments, there are several proximal and distal regions: a proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), proximal straight tubule (PST), followed by a distal early (DE) and distal late (DL) segment [42], named based on their similarity to the Xenopus pronephros organization [34].

Since this discovery, the zebrafish pronephros has been increasingly used to pursue developmental studies on renal progenitor patterning and nephrogenesis [17,18,20,43,44], as well as to model acute kidney injury and regeneration [45-47]. In terms of nephron formation, the pronephros is also a valuable model for two major reasons. First, the nephrons are linear at early developmental stages, and this enables high-resolution analysis of segmental domains in comparison to other axial landmarks (Figure 1) [20,42]. Simply put, the architecture and anatomical arrangement of the pronephric nephrons are highly amenable to evaluating the size and domain of each segment. Second, the zebrafish model permits forward and reverse genetics, thus enabling powerful modes of gene discovery and analysis.

In a recent study, the role of irx3b was assessed in the zebrafish pronephros through gene expression and knockdown studies [20]. In the developing zebrafish, the renal progenitors can be detected just after gastrulation in bilateral stripes of IM located on either side of the embryonic midline (Figure 1A) [20]. As somitogenesis occurs, the renal progenitor field displays regionalized patterns of gene expression that suggest the emergence of rostral and caudal domains [20]. Several hours later, at the 15 somite stage of development, a central domain emerges that is demarcated by irx3b (Figure 2A) [20]. irx3b transcripts continue to be expressed by centrally-located renal progenitors through to the 28 somite stage (Figure 2B). At this stage, the discrete nephron segment domains are formed, and can be visualized based on the restricted expression of specific solute transporters [20]. irx3b transcripts persist at high levels in the PST and DE segments throughout this time (which are the last proximal segment and the first distal segment) [20]. In addition, low levels of irx3b transcripts are detectable in the locale of the PCT that neighbors the PST (note the asterisk in Figure 2B) [20].


Figure 2: irx3b expression in the zebrafish pronephros. Whole mount in situ hybridization was performed to label irx3b (purple) or other kidney markers (cdh17, hnf4a, and evi1 (now known as mecom, [51])) (purple), along with myoD1 (red) used to label the somites. (A) irx3b is regionally expressed in the central domain of the renal progenitor field at the 15 somite stage of development. (Images of select 15 somite stage embryos adapted with author rights from [20]). (B) At the 28 somite stage, irx3b transcripts demarcate the central domain of the segmented nephron, and are most strongly expressed in the PST and DE segment domains.

Interestingly, the loss of irx3b function in zebrafish, which was assessed by injecting one-cell stage embryos with morpholinos to abrogate protein expression, led to the specific loss of the DE segment (Figure 3) [20]. This suggests that irx3b is essential for DE formation. In place of the DE, slightly expanded domains of both the PCT and PST developed (Figure 3) [20]. This could indicate that irx3b functions to modulate the boundary of the PCT/PST, a notion supported by the low level of irx3b transcripts that are detectable across the PCT/PST border region in wild type zebrafish embryos (Figure 2B). Further, knockdown of irx3b was associated with expansion of the Corpuscle of Stannius (CS), though this observation has yet to be further analyzed [20]. Taken together with the data from Xenopus, these findings suggest that a conserved role of irx3/irx3b is to direct the proper development of the segmental identities located in central domains of the nephron. However, future studies are needed to test the function of other irx family members in the zebrafish. Further, it remains unknown if the loss of irx3b is associated with any changes in the expression of other irx genes in the zebrafish pronephros.


Figure 3: irx3b knockdown in the zebrafish embryo leads to abrogation of the distal segment known as the DE, and concomitant expansion of the proximal nephron segments. (A) Whole mount in situ hybridization was performed to assess tubule segment composition in wild type embryos compared to irx3b knockdowns. In irx3b knockdowns, the expression domains of the PCT and PST markers slc20a1a and trpm7 are each expanded by one somite length, while the DE is absent and the DL is unchanged. (Images of selected 15 somite stage embryos adapted with author rights from [20]). (B) Summary of the segmental composition in wild type and irx3b knockdowns.

Relevance of irx Gene Activity during Mammalian Nephrogenesis

Gene expression studies of the mammalian kidney performed by Reggiani, et al. provide some basis for the hypothesis that irx functions may be conserved between lower vertebrates and mammals [19]. During mouse metanephros ontogeny, several irx genes are expressed during nephrogenesis when the nephron precursors are undergoing proliferation and elongation in so-called comma and S-shaped formations [19]. The authors found that irx3 is modestly expressed in the early comma shaped nephron [19]. In the S-shaped nephron, the central region of cells expressed Irx1, Irx2, and lower levels of Irx3 [19]. In the adult kidney, Reggiani, et al. also detected regionalized irx gene expression, with all three genes in the S3 segment of the proximal tubule, while Irx1 and Irx2 transcripts were found in the first section of the distal tubule known as the thick ascending limb [19]. These domains are certainly reminiscent of the regionalized location for the corresponding irx3/irx3b orthologues in the central nephron segments in Xenopus and zebrafish, respectively. Although these expression patterns are suggestive, functional analysis of irx genes is necessary in the mammalian kidney. Interestingly, recent studies of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1B (Hnf1b) transcription factor in both zebrafish and mammals have implicated irx genes acting downstream during nephrogenesis [48-50]. In zebrafish, loss of hnf1b gene activity by dual knockdown of the hnf1ba/b paralogs led to the loss of irx3b expression, and irx3b was reciprocally found to be required to maintain hnf1ba/b expression in the pronephros [48]. In the mouse, the inactivation of hnf1b is associated with drastic tubular defects, including the loss of intermediate and distal segments that correlated with reductions in the expression of Irx1 and Irx2 [49,50]. Further assessment of irx gene expression in these models is needed. For example, performing the conditional inactivation of single irx genes and combinations of irx genes are some of the next crucial steps in elucidating their functional roles and determining whether they share redundant functions during kidney development.

Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Nephrons have three fundamental parts, a blood filter, tubule comprised of numerous functional segments, and a duct. This fundamental structure of the nephron is broadly conserved in both in form and function across organisms that are evolutionarily quite diverse. At present, there is only a rudimentary knowledge of the gene regulatory networks that control nephrogenesis, particularly those involved in the pattern formation through which segment identities emerge. Uncovering these networks is vital to piece together the mechanisms of renal development. The pronephros in the frog and zebrafish shares fundamental similarities in nephron segment composition and organization with higher vertebrates. Several studies of the irx gene family have now implicated these genes as players in orchestrating segment patterning. The findings of Reggiani, et al. suggest a model in which irx3 regulates the expression of Irx1 and Irx2, and is necessary for the development of centrally-located segments in the frog nephron [19]. In zebrafish, the loss of irx3b is associated with a block in distal segment differentiation [20]. It is reasonable to hypothesize a functional role for the orthologues of these irx genes during mammalian nephron development based on the appearance of transcripts encoding Irx1, Irx2, and Irx3 in elongating metanephric kidney nephrons in the mouse, and emerging data from the study of hnf1b mouse knockout models [19,49,50].

Taken together, lessons learned from investigations of the pronephros have promise to help identify candidates that may be involved in nephron segmentation. In particular, the genetic tractability of the zebrafish model provides several unique opportunities for the identification and functional testing of nephrogenesis factors, as exemplified by recent studies [20,48,51]. The zebrafish model can be used to conduct forward and reverse genetic screens, as well as chemical genetic screens, to ascertain essential components of nephron pattern formation [39,45]. Both the zebrafish and frog embryos can be utilized for rapid functional assessments of renal genes through loss- and gainof- function interrogations. Thus, continued use of these models has significant potential to provide new information about the mechanisms of nephron segmentation, and may someday lead to insights applicable toward CAKUT therapies.


The Wingert lab is supported by funding from the following sources: National Institutes of Health grants K01DK083512, DP2OD008470, and R01DK100237; March of Dimes Basil O’Connor Starter Scholar grant award #5-FY12-75; start up funds from the University of Notre Dame College of Science and Department of Biological Sciences; and a generous gift to the University of Notre Dame from Elizabeth and Michael Gallagher on behalf of the Gallagher Family to foster stem cell research. The funders had no role in manuscript design, preparation or decision to publish. We thank the staffs of the Department of Biological Sciences for their support, and the Center for Zebrafish Research at Notre Dame for their outstanding dedication in the care and welfare of our zebrafish colony. Finally, we thank the members of our research lab for their support and discussions of the ideas presented in this review.


  1. Saxen L (1987) Organogenesis of the kidney. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  2. Reilly RF, Bulger RE, Kriz W (2007) Diseases of the Kidney and Urinary Tract, Chapter 1: Structural-functional relationships in the kidney. (8th Edn) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
  3. McCampbell KK, Wingert RA (2012) Renal stem cells: fact or science fiction? Biochem J 444: 153-168.
  4. Li Y, Wingert RA (2013) Regenerative medicine for the kidney: stem cell prospects & challenges. Clin Transl Med 2: 11.
  5. Little MH (2006) Regrow or repair: potential regenerative therapies for the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 2390-2401.
  6. Cirio MC, de Groh ED, de Caestecker MP, Davidson AJ, Hukriede NA (2013) Kidney regeneration: common themes from the embryo to the adult. Pediatr Nephrol.
  7. Nakanishi K, Yoshikawa N (2003) Genetic disorders of human congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Pediatr Int 45: 610-616.
  8. Schedl A (2007) Renal abnormalities and their developmental origin. Nat Rev Genet 8: 791-802.
  9. Toka HR, Toka O, Hariri A, Nguyen HT (2010) Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract. Semin Nephrol 30: 374-386.
  10. Song R, Yosypiv IV (2011) Genetics of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Pediatr Nephrol 26: 353-364.
  11. Little MH, McMahon AP (2012) Mammalian kidney development: principles, progress, and projections. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4.
  12. Kopan R, Cheng HT, Surendran K (2007) Molecular insights into segmentation along the proximal-distal axis of the nephron. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2014-2020.
  13. El-Dahr SS, Aboudehen K, Saifudeen Z (2008) Transcriptional control of terminal nephron differentiation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 294: F1273-1278.
  14. Costantini F, Kopan R (2010) Patterning a complex organ: branching morphogenesis and nephron segmentation in kidney development. Dev Cell 18: 698-712.
  15. Igarashi P (2005) Overview: nonmammalian organisms for studies of kidney development and disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 296-298.
  16. Romagnani P, Lasagni L, Remuzzi G (2013) Renal progenitors: an evolutionary conserved strategy for kidney regeneration. Nat Rev Nephrol 9: 137-146.
  17. Wingert RA, Davidson AJ (2008) The zebrafish pronephros: a model to study nephron segmentation. Kidney Int 73: 1120-1127.
  18. Gerlach GF, Wingert RA (2013) Kidney organogenesis in the zebrafish: insights into vertebrate nephrogenesis and regeneration. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2: 559-585.
  19. Reggiani L, Raciti D, Airik R, Kispert A, Brändli AW (2007) The prepattern transcription factor Irx3 directs nephron segment identity. Genes Dev 21: 2358-2370.
  20. Wingert RA, Davidson AJ (2011) Zebrafish nephrogenesis involves dynamic spatiotemporal expression changes in renal progenitors and essential signals from retinoic acid and irx3b. Dev Dyn 240: 2011-2027.
  21. Cavodeassi F, Modolell J, Gómez-Skarmeta JL (2001) The Iroquois family of genes: from body building to neural patterning. Development 128: 2847-2855.
  22. Gómez-Skarmeta JL, Modolell J (2002) Iroquois genes: genomic organization and function in vertebrate neural development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12: 403-408.
  23. Dambly-Chaudière C, Leyns L (1992) The determination of sense organs in Drosophila: a search for interacting genes. Int J Dev Biol 36: 85-91.
  24. Leyns L, Gómez-Skarmeta JL, Dambly-Chaudière C (1996) iroquois: a prepattern gene that controls the formation of bristles on the thorax of Drosophila. Mech Dev 59: 63-72.
  25. Cavodeassi F, Diez Del Corral R, Campuzano S, Domínguez M (1999) Compartments and organising boundaries in the Drosophila eye: the role of the homeodomain Iroquois proteins. Development 126: 4933-4942.
  26. Rodríguez-Seguel E, Alarcón P, Gómez-Skarmeta JL (2009) The Xenopus Irx genes are essential for neural patterning and define the border between prethalamus and thalamus through mutual antagonism with the anterior repressors Fezf and Arx. Dev Biol 329: 258-268.
  27. Briscoe J, Pierani A, Jessell TM, Ericson J (2000) A homeodomain protein code specifies progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell 101: 435-445.
  28. Christoffels VM, Keijser AG, Houweling AC, Clout DE, Moorman AF (2000) Patterning the embryonic heart: identification of five mouse Iroquois homeobox genes in the developing heart. Dev Biol 224: 263-274.
  29. Peters T, Dildrop R, Ausmeier K, Rüther U (2000) Organization of mouse Iroquois homeobox genes in two clusters suggests a conserved regulation and function in vertebrate development. Genome Res 10: 1453-1462.
  30. de la Calle-Mustienes E, Feijóo CG, Manzanares M, Tena JJ, Rodríguez-Seguel E, et al. (2005) A functional survey of the enhancer activity of conserved non-coding sequences from vertebrate Iroquois cluster gene deserts. Genome Res 15: 1061-1072.
  31. Dildrop R, Rüther U (2004) Organization of Iroquois genes in fish. Dev Genes Evol 214: 267-276.
  32. Vize PD, Seufert DW, Carroll TJ, Wallingford JB (1997) Model systems for the study of kidney development: use of the pronephros in the analysis of organ induction and patterning. Dev Biol 188: 189-204.
  33. Jones EA (2005) Xenopus: a prince among models for pronephric kidney development. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 313-321.
  34. Zhou X, Vize PD (2004) Proximo-distal specialization of epithelial transport processes within the Xenopus pronephric kidney tubules. Dev Biol 271: 322-338.
  35. Bellefroid EJ, Kobbe A, Gruss P, Pieler T, Gurdon JB, et al. (1998) Xiro3 encodes a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Iroquois genes and functions in neural specification. EMBO J 17: 191-203.
  36. Houweling AC, Dildrop R, Peters T, Mummenhoff J, Moorman AF, et al. (2001) Gene and cluster-specific expression of the Iroquois family members during mouse development. Mech Dev 107: 169-174.
  37. Raciti D, Reggiani L, Geffers L, Jiang Q, Bacchion F, et al. (2008) Organization of the pronephric kidney revealed by large-scale gene expression mapping. Genome Biol 9: R84.
  38. Alarcón P, Rodríguez-Seguel E, Fernández-González A, Rubio R, Gómez-Skarmeta JL (2008) A dual requirement for Iroquois genes during Xenopus kidney development. Development 135: 3197-3207.
  39. Lieschke GJ, Currie PD (2007) Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet 8: 353-367.
  40. Santoriello C, Zon LI (2012) Hooked! Modeling human disease in zebrafish. J Clin Invest 122: 2337-2343.
  41. Drummond IA, Majumdar A, Hentschel H, Elger M, Solnica-Krezel L, et al. (1998) Early development of the zebrafish pronephros and analysis of mutations affecting pronephric function. Development 125: 4655-4667.
  42. Wingert RA, Selleck R, Yu J, Song HD, Chen Z, et al. (2007) The cdx genes and retinoic acid control the positioning and segmentation of the zebrafish pronephros. PLoS Genet 3: 1922-1938.
  43. Ebarasi L, Oddsson A, Hultenby K, Betsholtz C, Tryggvason K (2011) Zebrafish: a model system for the study of vertebrate renal development, function, and pathophysiology. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 20: 416-424.
  44. Swanhart LM, Cosentino CC, Diep CQ, Davidson AJ, de Caestecker M, et al. (2011) Zebrafish kidney development: basic science to translational research. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 93: 141-156.
  45. Poureetezadi SJ, Wingert RA (2013) Congenital and acute kidney disease: translational research insights from zebrafish chemical genetics. General Med 1: 112.
  46. de Groh ED, Swanhart LM, Cosentino CC, Jackson RL, Dai W, et al. (2010) Inhibition of histone deacetylase expands the renal progenitor cell population. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 794-802.
  47. Cianciolo Cosentino C, Skrypnyk NI, Brilli LL, Chiba T, Novitskaya T, et al. (2013) Histone deacetylase inhibitor enhances recovery after AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol 24: 943-953.
  48. Naylor RW, Przepiorski A, Ren Q, Yu J, Davidson AJ (2013) HNF1β is essential for nephron segmentation during nephrogenesis. J Am Soc Nephrol 24: 77-87.
  49. Heliot C, Desgrange A, Buisson I, Prunskaite-Hyyryläinen R, Shan J, et al. (2013) HNF1B controls proximal-intermediate nephron segment identity in vertebrates by regulating Notch signalling components and Irx1/2. Development 140: 873-885.
  50. Massa F, Garbay S, Bouvier R, Sugitani Y, Noda T, et al. (2013) Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β controls nephron tubular development. Development 140: 886-896.
  51. Li Y1, Cheng CN1, Verdun VA1, Wingert RA2 (2014) Zebrafish nephrogenesis is regulated by interactions between retinoic acid, mecom, and Notch signaling. Dev Biol 386: 111-122.
Citation: Marra AN, Wingert RA (2014) Roles of Iroquois Transcription Factors in Kidney Development. Cell Dev Biol 3:131.

Copyright: © 2014 Marra AN, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.