GET THE APP

Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology

Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology
Open Access

ISSN: 2157-7048

+44-20-4587-4809

Commentry - (2021)Volume 12, Issue 7

Process Safety Education: A Comparitive Study

Rob Bos* and P Kouwenhoven
 
*Correspondence: CE0,. Rob Bos, PIMS International B.V, Netherlands, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

The immediate causes for the study are discussions with staff from multiple European Universities, articles and position papers of advisory committees and professional organization. They all express their worries about both the decline of education of process safety in the curricula of Chemical Engineering and the decline of research in process safety subjects

Keywords

Chemical Engineering; Process safety; bibliometric study

Introduction

Objective

The research of the study aims to either confirm or refute above articulated worries and to do so for the two levels of education: level 6 (≈ BSc), level 7 (≈ MSc, both regular and advanced).

Next, the incentive of the study is to start a discussion on how the alleged decline may be stopped.

Research question

Do the Chemical Engineering curricula of universities contain separate courses ‘Process Safety’ and if they do, what is the average time spent during the specific curriculum? A ensuing question reads:

Is the coverage of categories process safety adequate in the set of courses available for students? Is a student able to compose this said balance himself from a wide range of elective courses?

Methods

The research method applied has been the examination of websites of randomly selected Chemical Engineering study programmers [1-3]. The levels looked into were: regular BSc (mostly in the mother tongue language), regular MSc and Advanced MSc (mostly in English). Subsequently the description of the encountered courses was searched for key words of process safety [2-4]. The topics treated within these courses were grouped into seven categories to allow an appreciation of the completeness of the course (i.e. The degree of coverage of categories).

Results

Examination of courses ‘Process Safety’ if present within the curricula Chemical Engineering confirmed the trend of declining interest in process safety in Chemical Engineering curricula [5].

Of the 64 universities that offer a BSc Chemical Engineering 32 do not offer a separate course ‘proces safety’, the range of % ECTS of the universities that offer ‘proces safety’ courses runs from 0.5%– 8.3%, the average is 3.3%.

Of the 60 universities offering a regular MSc Chemical Engineering 20 don’t offer a separate course ‘proces safety’ [6-7]. The range of % ECTS of the universities offering ‘proces safety’ courses runs from 0.5%–12.5%, average is 3.1%. The results of a bibliometric study into the research output will be reported in a following paper [8-9].

Recommendations

The article makes a plea to join forces among universities, preferrably cross border cooperation between the faculties Chemical Engineering. Next, there is a lot of expertise and know how at commercial parties, be it industry, be it consulting firms (DNV, Dekra, Gexcon, …). By joining forces sufficient critical mass is obtained for both teaching and research. The benefits are:

• exchange of expertise

• increased research output

• increased depth of research

• increased funding

References

  1. Adviesraad Gevaarlijke Stoffen (AGS). Strategic Approach for Safe Chemical and Energy Industries. 2009
  2. Dechema-VDI ProcessNet. Model Curriculum â??Process and Plant Safetyâ?.2013
  3. Gyenes Z. Improve process safety in undergraduate education. Chem. Eng.Trans. 75.2019
  4. IChemE. Learning outcomes: Improve process safety education in undergrad-uate engineering Ed.1.2018
  5. IChemE. Accreditation of chemical engineering programmes. A guide forhigher education providers and Assessors, V5.0.2020
  6. Perrin LN, Gabas N, Corriou JP. Promoting safety teaching: anessential requirement for the chemical engineering education in French Univer-sities. J Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 54, 190â??195.2018.
  7. Perrin L, Laurent A. Current situation and future implementation of safetycurricula for chemical engineering education in France. Educ. Chem. Eng. 3 (2),e84â??e91, In press.2008
  8. Pfeil N, Jochum C, Mitropetros K, Schmelzer PG. Keeping and improvingprocess and plant safety competenceâ??What is needed, What should be done? CET 31, 373â??378.2013
  9. Wassenhoven Wvan, Foussard C. Professionalization in safety: A study ofthe fundamental knowledge of future safety professionals. In: Proceedings of the30th European Safety and Reliability Conference, Research Publishing, Singapore, pp. 4567â??4573.2020

Author Info

Rob Bos* and P Kouwenhoven
 
PIMS International B.V, Netherlands
 

Received: 14-Jul-2021 Accepted: 28-Jul-2021 Published: 04-Aug-2021 , DOI: 10.35248/2157-7048.21.12.422

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Top