GET THE APP

Potential Clinical Application of Novel Cardiac Biomarker (Tropon
Emergency Medicine: Open Access

Emergency Medicine: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2165-7548

+44 1223 790975

Mini Review - (2014) Volume 4, Issue 3

Potential Clinical Application of Novel Cardiac Biomarker (Troponin) and Stress Marker (Copeptin) for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department

Nima Sherpa*, Lu Cheng Zhi and Aubdool-Essackjee
Department of Cardiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
*Corresponding Author: Nima Sherpa, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China, Tel: 022-23626360 Email:

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction is the major cause of death and disability worldwide, with an ongoing increase in incidence every year. Therefore, diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction should be made early and accurately to decrease the associated mortality and morbidity. The current gold standard cardiac biomarkers (Troponin and CKMB) for rapid rule in and rule out for acute myocardial infarction has downside since these biomarkers do not rise within first hours from onset of AMI. The delayed increase in detectable circulating levels of these markers contributes to delay in diagnosis and therapy in patients presenting early to the emergency department. The use of Copeptin (AVP), an anti-diuretic hormone of the hypothalamic pituitary axis which rises early after AMI has a good diagnostic accuracy when used together with cardiac troponin. This dual marker strategy of combining troponin and copeptin safely rule out acute myocardial infarction with high sensitivity and negative predictive value of >99%. These novel markers are not only used for establishing the diagnosis of AMI but also helpful for determining prognosis and further stratifying patients at high risks that would determine the therapeutic approach.

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, Copeptin, Tropinin, sST2

Introduction

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is defined as a clinical cardiac event resulting in death of myocardial tissue caused by ischemia [1]. Rapid assessment of these patients is critical to direct further diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is based on symptoms, signs and findings on the electrocardiogram but in some patients these findings are nondiagnostic. In this patient population the use of cardiac biomarker which indicates cardiac tissue necrosis, of which troponin and Creatine Kinase Isoenzyme (CKMB) are prefered markers, play a pivotal role [2,3]. These novel markers allow for rule in of AMI within 3 hours after presentation in majority of patients [4] and offer the opportunity to initiate appropriate, evidence based treatment strategy [5,6].

The major drawback of current troponin assays is sensitivity deficit at presentation due to delayed release of circulating levels [7]. Therefore AMI exclusion requires prolonged period of monitoring for 6 to 9 hours and serial blood sampling, the grey zone for troponin elevation which consequently leads to overcrowding in the emergency department and increases the associated cost every year [8,9]. The vast majority of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain turn out not to have AMI [10]. One quarter to one third of patients with AMI present without significant ECG changes indicative of ischemia; therefore ECG is of little help to rule out AMI [10,11]. Currently, the process for AMI exclusion is time and cost consuming [11]. A fast and reliable method for differential diagnosis must be established.

In this setting, Arginine Vasopression (AVP), also known as antidiuretic hormone is one of the key hormone of hypothalamic pituitary-adrenal axis and osmostic control of homeostasis. Copeptin, a 39 peptide amino acid, is the C-terminal portion of the pro- AVP and is released together with AVP during the processing of precursor peptide [12]. However due to its unstable nature and rapid clearance from the plasma, measurement of AVP is rarely indicated [13-15]. Copeptin on the other hand is more stable and is easier to measure and is secreted in equimolar amounts with AVP [16]. In recent years, copeptin as marker of acute endogenous stress hormone has been demonstrated in different clinical conditions such as sepsis [15,17] pneumonia, lower respiratory tract infections [18,19], heart disease [20-22] and stroke [23,24]. The pathophysiology of copeptin secretion is therefore independent of cardiac cell necrosis and involves the body’s response to acute stress/injury.

An increase in copeptin concentrations after acute myocardial infarction was first reported by khan et al, with highest values reported on day 1 and a subsequent decline over next 3 to 5 days [21]. Gu et al. have demonstrated that copeptin peaks within the first hour after symptom onset, falling to normal ranges within the first day [25]. Copeptin is an excellent surrogate of AVP which is shown to be elevated in AMI [26,27]. In sheep model of AMI, the peak response of AVP occurred at 40 minute after embolization and AVP was elevated for >12 hour [25]. The accuracy of copeptin in the detection of AMI has been highlighted in previous studies. In these studies, the accuracy of copeptin alone was limited, but it added incremental value to the conventional cardiac troponin assay, and was even more valuable early after onset of symptoms [21,28].

The focus of this review is to highlight the clinical importance of adding stress marker (copeptin) to conventional cardiac assays and their application in fast and accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in emergency settings.

The leicesture Acute Myocardial infarction peptide study proved the usefulness of combination of copeptin level <14 pmol/l and troponin level <0.01ug/l. to rule out AMI, with negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.7% and higher sensitivity (98.8%). This finding from LAMP study concluded copeptin as a potential cardiac marker in 2007 [21].

The additional incremental value of copeptin to troponin was first elucidated by Reichilin et al., in management of 487 consecutive patients with chest pain presenting to the ED. In those patients with diagnosis of AMI (17%), copeptin concentrations were already elevated 4 hour after onset of symptoms when the concentration of troponin was undetectable in many patients. As copeptin concentrations declined, and troponin concentrations increased, the gap was bridged which resulted in an additive value of both markers for the diagnosis of AMI. The Area under the curve (AUC) of troponin alone at presentation when compared to combination of copeptin and troponin was increased from 0.86 to 0.97. A copeptin level (<14 pmol/l) in combination with negative troponin (<0.01 ug/l) correctly ruled out AMI with a high sensitivity (98.8%) and a negative predictive value of 99.7% [7].

emergency-medicine-release-of-Vasopressin

Figure 1: The release of Vasopressin (AVP) and copeptin (CP) from the hypothalamus and pituitary ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone (Adopted from Nickel et al. BMC Medicine 2012, 10:7)

A second study by keller et al. confirmed these findings and demonstrated that the combined measurement of copeptin and troponin T improved the c-statistics from 0.84 for TnT alone to 0.93 for a combination of copeptin and troponin T. This finding was more significant in patients presenting within 3 hour after symptoms onset. In this group the combination c-statistics increased from 0.77 to 0.9 with a negative predictive value of 92.4% [28].

Similarly, CHOPIN is the largest multi-center trial of this type to date with 1,967 patients with chest pain presenting to an emergency department within 6 hour after chest pain onset. In these patients AMI was the final diagnosis in 7.9%. This large, multicenter trial confirms that the combination of a negative troponin and negative copeptin on presentation allows the rule out of AMI for 58% patients with >99.2% negative predictive value. In addition copeptin value (>14 pmol/l) was able to detect greater numbers of patient with Acute myocardial infarction and Non ST elevation myocardial infarction at presentation when cardiac troponin was undetectable. Both elevated copeptin and troponin were predictors of death at 180 days and were independent of age and each other with additive negative predictive value [29].

These results are true for patients presenting early after onset of symptom and it is likely that the added benefit of copeptin may loss significance when present late. To date, conventional cardiac biomarkers have limited ability in ruling out AMI in patients presenting with early symptoms suggestive for an AMI but with nondiagnostic findings on ECG [30]. The current findings from the CHOPIN together with previous study by Reichlin et al suggest that copeptin may be potentially valuable marker on top of cardiac troponin for early detection of AMI. Based on these studies, repeated ECG monitoring and serial blood sampling for biomarkers , could be limited to only those patients positive for either troponin(>0.01ug/l)/ or copeptin (>14pmol/l) while those patients whose both markers are negative, no longer required repeated ECG monitoring and serial blood sampling for biomarkers. This dual marker strategy which combines troponin and copeptin can be used for rapid and reliable means for exclusion of AMI. This approach would save patients from expensive monitoring for markers and laboratory assays [7]. Recent studies have also indicated that soluble serum ST2 member of the IL-1 receptor family is significantly elevated during the process of acute myocardial infarction. It is reported that soluble ST2 levels are increased in the serum of patients 1 day after myocardial infarction. Furthermore, ST2 serum levels predict outcome in post AMI patients and has an independent predictive value for the prognosis of AMI patients [31-36]. These data suggests that measurement of serum levels of ST2 may provide insight into the hemodynamic burden of the myocardium. So measurement of copeptin and sST2 in blood samples could be a clinical prognostic biomarker useful in risk stratifications of patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate the prognostic value of ST2 in conjunction with copeptin and other available biomarkers. Thus, these novel biomarkers needs to be further evaluated in larger prospective and interventional studies to produce better evidence for a routine clinical evaluation of patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular diseases.

Conclusion

In the Emergency department patients presenting with acute chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the combination of cardiac troponin and copeptin, provide faster exclusion of AMI, yet with very good accuracy. In addition to save money and time ,rapid exclusion of AMI would lead to better management of high risks patients that would hopefully reduce the adverse events related to AMI such as heart failure and death. Early detection of AMI would reduce the mortality and morbidity. These novel markers are not solely used for diagnosing AMI but also used in stratifying risks and prognosis that would determine the therapeutic approach of these patients.

References

  1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Apple FS, et al. (2007) Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 116:2634-2653.
  2. Apple FS, Jesse RL, Newby LK, Wu AH, Christenson RH et al. (2007) National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and IFCC Committee for Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: analytical issues for biochemical markers of acute coronary syndromes.ClinChem 53: 547-551.
  3. Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Jesse RL,Newby LK, Ravkilde J, et al. (2007) National academy of clinical biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines: clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. ClinChem 53: 552-574.
  4. Macrae AR, Kavsak PA, Lustig V, Bhargava R, Vandersluis R, et al. (2006) Assessing the requirement for the 6-hour interval between specimens in the American Heart Association Classification of Myocardial Infarction in Epidemiology and Clinical Research Studies. ClinChem 52: 812-818.
  5. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, et al. (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emerg Med (Los Angel) . J Am CollCardiol50:e1-157.
  6. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, et al. (2008)2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am CollCardiol51: 210-247.
  7. Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Stelzig C, Laule K, Freidank H, et al. (2009) Incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction. J Am CollCardiol 54: 60-68.
  8. Polanczyk CA, Kuntz KM, Sacks DB, Johnson PA, Lee TH (1999) Emergency department triage strategies for acute chest pain using creatine kinase-MB and troponin I assays: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 131: 909-918.
  9. Forberg JL, Henriksen LS, Edenbrandt L, Ekelund U (2006) Direct hospital costs of chest pain patients attending the emergency department: a retrospective study. BMC Emerg Med 6: 6.
  10. Melanson SE Morrow DA, Jarolim P (2007) Earlier detection of myocardial injury in a preliminary evaluation using a new troponin I assay with improved sensitivity. Am J ClinPathol 128: 282-286.
  11. Peacock WF (2008) Will SCUBE1 solve the ischemia marker deficit? J Am CollCardiol 51: 2181-2183.
  12. Land H, Schütz G, Schmale H, Richter D (1982) Nucleotide sequence of cloned cDNA encoding bovine arginine vasopressin-neurophysin II precursor. Nature 295: 299-303.
  13. Evans MJ, Livesey JH, Ellis MJ, Yandle TG (2001) Effect of anticoagulants and storage temperatures on stability of plasma and serum hormones. ClinBiochem 34: 107-112.
  14. Latendresse G, Ruiz RJ (2008) Bioassay research methodology: measuring CRH in pregnancy. Biol Res Nurs 10: 54-62.
  15. Struck J, Morgenthaler NG, Bergmann A (2005) Copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the vasopressin precursor, is elevated in serum of sepsis patients. Peptides 26: 2500-2504.
  16. Morgenthaler NG, Struck J, Alonso C, Bergmann A (2006) Assay for the measurement of copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the precursor of vasopressin. ClinChem 52: 112-119.
  17. Lindner KH, Strohmenger HU, Ensinger H, Hetzel WD, Ahnefeld FW, et al. (1992) Stress hormone response during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anesthesiology 77: 662-668.
  18. Müller B, Morgenthaler N, Stolz D, Schuetz P, Müller C, et al. (2007) Circulating levels of copeptin, a novel biomarker, in lower respiratory tract infections. Eur J Clin Invest 37: 145-152.
  19. Stolz D, Christ-Crain M, Morgenthaler NG, Leuppi J, Miedinger D, et al. (2007) Copeptin, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin as prognostic biomarkers in acute exacerbation of COPD. Chest 131: 1058-1067.
  20. Stoiser B, Mörtl D, Hülsmann M, Berger R, Struck J, et al. (2006) Copeptin, a fragment of the vasopressin precursor, as a novel predictor of outcome in heart failure. Eur J Clin Invest 36: 771-778.
  21. Khan SQ, Dhillon OS, O’Brien RJ, Struck J, Quinn PA, et al. (2007) C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) as a novel and prognostic marker in acute myocardial infarction: Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide (LAMP) study. Circulation 115: 2103-2110.
  22. Tang WH, Francis GS, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Cannon CP, et al. (2007) National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine practice guidelines: clinical utilization of cardiac biomarker testing in heart failure. Circulation 116: e99-e109.
  23. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, et al. (2009) Heart disease and stroke statistics- 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 119: 480-486.
  24. Whiteley W, Chong WL, Sengupta A, Sandercock P (2009) Blood markers for the prognosis of ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 40: e380-389.
  25. Gu YL, Voors AA, Zijlstra F, Hillege HL, Struck J, et al. (2011) Comparison of the temporal release pattern of copeptin with conventional biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol 100: 1069-1076.
  26. McAlpine HM, Morton JJ, Leckie B, Rumley A, Gillen G, et al. (1988) Neuroendocrine activation after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 60: 117-124.
  27. Donald RA, Crozier IG, Foy SG, Richards AM, Livesey JH, et al. (1994) Plasma corticotrophin releasing hormone, vasopressin, ACTH and cortisol responses to acute myocardial infarction. ClinEndocrinol (Oxf) 40: 499-504.
  28. Keller T, Tzikas S, Zeller T, Czyz E, Lillpopp L, et al. (2010) Copeptin improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. J Am CollCardiol 55: 2096-2106.
  29. Maisel A, Mueller C, Neath SX, Christenson RH, Morgenthaler NG, et al. (2013) Copeptin helps in the early detection of patients with acute myocardial infarction: primary results of the CHOPIN trial (Copeptin Helps in the early detection Of Patients with acute myocardial INfarction). J Am CollCardiol 62: 150-160.
  30. Staub D, Morgenthaler NG, Buser C, Breidthardt T, Potocki M, et al. (2009) Use of copeptin in the detection of myocardial ischemia. ClinChimActa 399: 69-73.
  31. Weinberg EO,Shimpo M, De Keulenaer GW, MacGillivray C, Tominaga S, et al. (2002) Expression and regulation of ST2, an interleukin-1 receptor family member, in cardiomyocytes and myocardial infarction. Circulation 106: 2961-2966.
  32. Shimpo M, Morrow DA, Weinberg EO, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, et al. (2004) Serum levels of the interleukin-1 receptor family member ST2 predict mortality and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 109: 2186-2190.
  33. Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Higgins LJ, MacGillivray C, Guo W, et al. (2008) Complementary roles for biomarkers of biomechanical strain ST2 and N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 117: 1936-1944.
  34. Dhillon OS, Narayan HK, Quinn PA, Squire IB, Davies JE, et al. (2011) Interleukin 33 and ST2 in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Risk Scoring and NT-proBNP. Am Heart J 161: 1163-1170.
  35. Weir RA, Miller AM, Murphy GE, Clements S, Steedman T, et al. (2010) Serum soluble ST2: a potential novel mediator in left ventricular and infarct remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. J Am CollCardiol 55: 243-250.
  36. Eggers KM, Armstrong PW, Califf RM, Simoons ML, Venge P, et al. (2010) ST2 and mortality in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 159: 788-794.
Citation: Sherpa N, Zhi LC, Essackjee A (2014) Potential Clinical Application of Novel Cardiac Biomarker (Troponin) and Stress Marker (Copeptin) for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department. Emergency Med 4:186.

Copyright: © 2014 Sherpa N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top