GET THE APP

Investigation of Differentially Expressed Proteins of Candida tro
Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Open Access

ISSN: 0974-276X

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2018) Volume 11, Issue 2

Investigation of Differentially Expressed Proteins of Candida tropicalis Biofilm in Response to Citral

Apurva Chatrath, Poonam Kumari, Rashmi Gangwar and Ramasare Prasad*
Molecular Biology & Proteomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee-247667, Uttarakhand, India
*Corresponding Author: Ramasare Prasad, Molecular Biology & Proteomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee-247667, Uttarakhand, India, Tel: +91-1332-285791, Fax: + 91-1332-273560

Abstract

Candida tropicalis is an opportunistic human pathogen with an ability to cause superficial as well as systemic infections in immunocompromised patients. C. tropicalis biofilms can cause persistent infections which are difficult to treat due to acquired resistance. Citral has been used as antifungal agents against Candida species and biofilms. In the present study, we used one-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (1D-PAGE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS) to identify the changes in the protein expression of C. tropicalis in response to the sub-lethal concentration of citral. A total of six differential proteins involved inoxidative stress (Tsa1p, Psa2p), amino acid biosynthesis (Met6p, Gln1p), heme biosynthesis (Hem13p) and glucose metabolism (Eno1p) pathways were detected. Our results revealed citral-induced proteins of C. tropicalis biofilm. This study will further help in the interpretation of mode of action of citral and development of novel antifungal agents against these potential protein targets.

Keywords: Candida tropicalis; Citral; Antifungal

Introduction

Candida tropicalis is the most prevalent non-albicans Candida species in tropical countries responsible for high mortality rate due to candidiasis [1,2]. C. tropicalis exhibits an intrinsic ability to form the biofilmon the biotic as well as abiotic surfaces [2]. The infected devices isolated from the patients have revealed biofilms formed by fungal species which seed furtherrecurrent infections [3]. The C. tropicalis biofilm has shown elevated resistance towards conventional drugs, including fluconazole and amphotericin B as well as other antifungal agents [4,5]. Candida species have evolved numerous mechanisms; including alteration of targets, reduction in uptake and active extrusion, in order to combat the effects of standard antifungal agents [6]. The use of the natural products is common from earliest civilizations and well known for their antiseptic and medicinal properties [7]. In recent decades, the development of new bioactive compounds based on modified natural products is suggestively considered to overcome the emerging resistance [8].

Citral, a major component of the essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus ( ~ 75%), has shown to exhibit potent activity against Candida species and its biofilm [9-11]. A recent study on C. tropicalis by Sousa et al. has demonstrated the likely mechanism of the action of citral does not involve cell walls or direct binding to ergosterol but is mediated through the inhibition of membrane ergosterols biosynthesis; however, the molecular mechanism remains unclear [12]. “Hypothesis-free” system biology tools such as genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics can be utilized to investigate the molecular machinery of the antifungal resistance and drug development. The identification of the potential drug targets which are frequently involved in essential signalling pathways is required to explore the molecular mechanism of action which can be used for the development of the novel therapeutics and optimization of the existing agents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the variation of protein profile of C. tropicalis biofilm when exposed to citral. In the present work, the differences in the expression of the proteins of C. tropicalis biofilm in the presence of citral were identified using proteomics approach.

Materials and Methods

Phytoconstituents, standard antifungal and substances

Citral and standard antifungal drugs; amphotericin B (AmpB) and fluconazole (FLU) were commercially acquired from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. The stock solution of citral and standard drugs were prepared in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, HiMedia, India). Culture media Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB), Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and RPMI- 1640-L-glutamine (without sodium bicarbonate) were purchased from Hi Media, India.

Fungal strain and growth conditions

C. tropicalis strain (NCIM-3118) used in the present study was procured from National Collection of Industrial Microorganism, Pune. The strain was streaked on SDA and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Glycerol stock of the strain was prepared in SDB and frozen at -80°C.

Antifungal and anti-biofilm susceptibility testing

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50) of citral and antifungal drugs (AmpB and FLU) were determined by broth micro dilution following reference protocols M27-A3 as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2008) [13]. Serially double-diluted concentration of citral and standard drugs (0–1,024 μg/mL) were added in 96-well microtiter plates to provide 0.5-2.5 × 103 cells/mL with 5% DMSO as the negative control. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h and growth of cells was measured by microtiter plate reader (Spectra Max, Molecular Devices, USA) at 600 nm and MIC50 was determined. The anti-biofilm susceptibility assay was performed in 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates to determine biofilm inhibitory (BIC50) and biofilm eradicating concentrations (BEC50) as described earlier [14]. The serial double diluted concentration of citral/drugs (0–1,024 μg/mL) were made in RPMI-1640 and added to each well as treatment while acquiring a final concentration of cells as 1 × 106 cells/ml with 5- DMSO in RPMI-1640 as a negative control. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and the metabolic activity of biofilm was quantitatively determined by colourimetricXTT [2, 3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium- 5-carboxanilide sodium salt] reduction assay at 492 nm. Further, the BIC50 and BEC50 values were determined.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

The effect of citral and Amp B on biofilm was qualitatively evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Carl Zeiss, AG, EVO 40) as described in an earlier study [15], with slight modifications. The biofilm was formed on sterile fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) pre-treated silicon elastomer discs in 12 well culture plates at 37°C for 24 h. The preformed biofilms were treated in the presence citral and AmpB at their respective BEC50 values and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. After incubation, the biofilm were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.01 M, pH 7.4) and subsequently fixed in 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (HiMedia, India) followed by dehydration in a series of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the ethanol (Merck). Finally, the samples were dried and sputtered with gold for visualization under SEM in high-vacuum mode at 20 kV.

Whole cell protein extraction

C. tropicalis biofilm was cultured without and with citral treatment (BEC50) on silicon elastomer sheets for 24 h at 37°C. After incubation, the sheets were washed with PBS to remove non-adherent cells and resulting biofilm was scraped off, centrifuged (5 mins, 4000 g) and washed thrice with PBS. Cell pellets were re-suspended in lysis buffer (20 mMTris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate and protease inhibitor cocktail) and disrupted using glass beads with alternate vortexing on the ice every 30 sec. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 12000 g for 20 mins at 4°C. Further, the protein concentration was measured using BCA assay (Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit).

One-dimensional (1D) gel electrophoresis and protein identification

The whole cell protein lysates (75 μg) of treated and untreated biofilm were separated on 10% 1D sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) at constant 90 V. Then, the gel was fixed, stained, destained and imaged using a Gel Doc XR+system (Bio-Rad) and differentially expressed proteins were selected for further identification. Protein bands of interest were excised and in-gel digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as previously described [16]. In brief, each excised band were destained using the ammonium bicarbonate/acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) and acetonitrile (100%) followed by trypsin digestion for 16 h at 37°C. The digested peptides were recollected in extraction buffer (1:2 (v/v) 5% formic acid/acetonitrile) at room temperature. The peptides were dried in Speedy Vac (Labconco) and stored at -20°C for mass spectrometry. The samples were mixed with HCCA (α-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid) matrix and spotted on the MALDI plate. The mass spectrometric analysis was carried out using Ultraflextreme MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) equipped with a 60- Hz nitrogen laser in positive mode. Background ions from trypsin autolysis and keratin contamination were cleared from mass lists. Protein identification was performed by searching the generated peak list files to NCBI database using the Mascot Server 2.4(http://www.matrixscience.com). The MASCOT search parameters were: 1) allowed number of missed cleavage: 1; 2) fixed modification: carbamidomethyl cysteine; 3) variable modification: methionine oxidation; 4) peptide tolerance: ± 200 ppm; 5) MS/MS tolerance: ± 0.7 Da; and 6) peptide charge: +1. Probabilistic MASCOT scoring was used to evaluate the identified peptides and proteins. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant for peptide identification. The false discovery rate (FDR) was less than 2%, by searching against a decoy database. All experiments were performed in three replicates to minimize the error.

Results and Discussion

Candida biofilms have shown more resistance to the antifungals agents than their planktonic counterparts. Biofilms usually develop resistance to cope the stress caused by antifungal drugs [17]. The MIC50, BIC50 and BEC50are defined as the concentration which inhibits 50% cell growth in contrast to the control. AmpB, FLU and citral have shown a significant effect against C. Tropicalis but less effective during biofilm formation and biofilm eradication. TheBIC50 and BEC50were two and four folds higher than planktonic cells, respectively (Table 1). The results were in corroboration with the previous studies in which C. tropicalis biofilm wasresistant during treatment [18]. The formation of biofilms was visualized through SEM imaging as shown in (Figure 1). Control biofilms displayed confluent cells, whereas the treated biofilm were ensuring distorted porous cells. These morphological alterations of the cells could be associated with the loss of cell membrane integrity caused by bursting of the cells and subsequent oozing out of intracellular components ultimately resulting in cell death [19]. Fungal biofilms have exhibited changes in the expression of various proteins associated with the antifungal tolerance [20]. The differentially expressed proteins in the biofilm during the presence and absence of citral were examined through protein profiling of the whole cell extract of C. tropicalis biofilm. The use of 1D gel electrophoresis has successfully been implemented in the studying the protein profiling [21]. 1D gelimages (Figure 2) indicated four distinct bandsat ~ 85 kDa, ~ 45 kDa, ~ 37 kDa and ~ 21 kDa, respectively, in the presence of citral when compared with untreated biofilm. The obtained protein bands were identified by high throughput mass spectrometry. Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) has identified a reference protein and six proteins with differential expression through MASCOT Server. A reference protein: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (XP_002551368.1, Mw: 36.209 kDa, Score: 87) with three peptides (R.DPINIPWG.K, K.EATYEEICAAV.K, K.IHVFQE.R) was observed with similar expression in both the samples. On the other hand out of the six differentially expressed proteins; two were associated with oxidative stress (Tsa1p, Psa2p), two with amino acid biosynthesis (Met6p, Gln1p), one with heme biosynthesis (Hem13p) and one with glucose metabolism (Eno1p). The differentially expressed proteins and their respective peptides are documented in (Table 2).

S. No. Drugs MIC50 (µg/ml) BIC50 (µg/ml) BEC50 (µg/ml)
1 Amphotericin B 0.5 1 2
2 Fluconazole 8 16 32
3 Citral 32 64 128

Table 1: IC50 values of drugs against Candida tropicalis. Values represent the arithmetic means (p<0.05) of the effective concentration against planktonic cells and biofilms.

proteomics-bioinformatics-biofilm-confluence

Figure 1: Scanning electron microscopyimages of C. tropicalis biofilm confluence grown on substrate reveals the surface topology
a) Untreatedcells (0 μg/ml),
b) With AmpB (0.5 μg/ml), and
c) With citral (16 μg/ml). Yellow arrows denote cell damage (Scale: 1μm).

proteomics-bioinformatics-gel-electrophoresis

Figure 2: C. tropicalis proteins resolved using 1D gel electrophoresis. a) 1D gel image: Lane 1: Molecular weight marker (kDa) as indicated on the left side; Lane 2: Control biofilm; and Lane 3: Citral (16 μg/ml) b) Zoomed subsets of the dotted box on the gel with distinct bands. Reference protein is shown in the yellow box. Differentially expressed proteins that were identified by mass spectrometer are correspondingly numbered in Table 2.

Band No. Accession No.a Proteinb Functional description Mw (kDa) Scorec Identified peptidesd
1 XP_002546146.1 Methionine-synthesizing 5-methyl tetrahydro-pteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine methyltransferase (Met6) Amino-acid biosynthesis 85.69 69 K.GQITAEEYEAFINKEIETVVR.F
M.VQSSVLGFPR.M
R.YVRPPIIVGDVDRPK.A
K.YDLAPIDVLFAMGR.G
K.AGVDVIQVDEPALR.E
R.SDYLNWAAQSFR.V
K.AIENLPVAGFHFDFVR.V
2 XP_002548866.1 Enolase1 (Eno1) Glucose metabolism 46.984 118 R.SGETEDTFIADLSVGLR.N
K.IQIVGDDLTVTNPIR.I
K.VNQIGTLTESIQAANDSYAAGWGVMVSHR.S
2 XP_002545775.1 Glutamine synthetase (Gln1) Amino acid biosynthesis 42.090 60 K.VLAEYVWIDAEGNTR.S
3 XP_002548314.1 Coproporphyrinogen III oxidase (Hem13) Heme biosynthesis 37.087 41 M.VSPDQIHDTSFPIRER.M
K.GGVNISIVHGKLPPQAVTR.M
4 XP_002547929.1 Peroxiredoxin (Tsa1) Oxidative-stress 21.839 76 R.DYGVLIEEEGVALR.G
K.DAQVLFASTDSEYTWLAWTNVAR.K
4 XP_002545791.1 Protoplast secreted protein 2 precursor (Pst2) Oxidative-stress 21.228 160 K.MHAPAKPDYPIASAETLTQYDAFLFGIPTR.F
K.IAIIEYSTYGHITQLSR.A
K.AFALQSNLEEIHGASAYGAGTFAGADGSR.Q
K.VAIIIYSLYHHVAQLAEEEK.K
K.AFWDTTGGLWAQGALHGK.Y

aProtein accession numbers according to NCBI protein database;
bProtein named and description according to the C. tropicalis genomic database (CandidaDB);
cScore based on NCB Inr database using the MASCOT server as MALDI-TOF data (p< 0.05);
dPeptides generated through Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Table 2: Summary of the identified proteins with differential expressions in response to citral.

Oxidative stress is concurrently prominent during the antifungal resistance. The thiol-specific antioxidant 1 (Tsa1) protein plays an important role in the survival of cells under oxidative stress created by the host immune response. Shin et al. reported that C. albicans TSA1 mutants show higher levels of H2O2 which indicated the Tsa1p ability to neutralize this peroxide [22]. Tsa1p is also expressed in C. tropicalis in response to citral suggesting that it may have caused the inhibition of biofilm by developing the oxidative stress condition. Similarly, the up regulation of Tsa1p in C. glabarata represented one of the rescue mechanisms during oxidative stress [21]. In C. albicans, the up regulation of the various oxidative stress-related proteins has indicated that the higher antifungal resistance is contributed by anti-oxidant biomarkers including alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, thioredoxin peroxidase and thioredoxin [23]. The four eisosome proteins (Pst1, Pst2, Pst3 and Ycp4) have recently shown novel antioxidant function in C. albicans [24]. Pst2pis also identified with over expressionin the presence of citral.

The expression of methionine-synthesizing, 5-methyl tetrahydropteroyltriglutamate homocysteine methyltransferase (Met6p) and glutamine synthetase (Gln1p), which are essential enzymes of amino acid biosynthesis pathways, upregulated in the presence of citral. In higher plants, fungi and some prokaryotes represent cobalaminindependent methionine synthases, whereas human methionine synthase is cobalamin-dependent. Therefore, the development of novel antifungal agents which targets cobalamin-independent methionine synthase can be an effective approach for specific inhibition [25]. Similarly, the over-expression of Gln1 pin the present study also directs to further elaborate diverse aspects in hindering these pathways. This stimulates the development of specific novel inhibitory molecules against these enzymes. Several enzymes of these pathways are already proven drug targets [26].

Coproporphyrinogen III oxidase (Hem13p) involved in heme biosynthesis is also expressed during citral treatment. A previous study has suggested that heme plays a vital role in sterol biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation of several processes related genes [27]. Sterol biosynthesis such as ergosterol maintains the cell membrane integrity. The hindrance of ergosterol biosynthesis has constantly been a major target pathway for antifungals including azoles.

Citral has induced the expression of enolase 1 protein (Eno1p), indicating its usage for in vivo antibody generation during infections in correspondence to the investigations when mice vaccinated with Eno1p of C. albicans, showed an increase in antibody resulting higher survival rate than non-vaccinated mice [28]. Clinical use of citral in combination with conventional drugs might escalate their efficacy through antibody production by the host cells.

Conclusion

The biofilm lifestyle, stress response and antifungal tolerance are directly related to the endurance of the fungus in a hostile milieu. From this study, it is concluded that the biofilm not only causes antifungal resistance but also help in the survival of C. tropicalis in distributed habitats. Detailed experiments are required to explore more proteins which are expressed during the exposure of citral to devise the probable targets.

Acknowledgement

Authors are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India for providing the financial support in the form of the fellowship to AC.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. Chander J, Singla N, Sidhu SK, Gombar S (2013) Epidemiology of Candida blood stream infections: Experience of a tertiary care centre in North India. J Infect Dev Ctries 7: 670-675.
  2. Kothavade RJ, Kura MM, Valand AG, Panthaki MH (2010) Candida tropicalis: Its prevalence, pathogenicity and increasing resistance to fluconazole. J Med Microbiol 59: 873-880.
  3. Lynch AS, Robertson GT (2008) Bacterial and fungal biofilm infections. Annu Rev Med 59: 415-428.
  4. Bergamo VZ, Donato RK, Dalla Lana DF, Donato KJZ, Ortega GG, et al. (2015) Imidazolium salts as antifungal agents: Strong antibiofilm activity against multidrug-resistant Candida tropicalis isolates. Lett Appl Microbiol 60: 66-71.
  5. Harrison JJ, Turner RJ, Ceri H (2007) A subpopulation of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis biofilm cells are highly tolerant to chelating agents. FEMS Microbiology Letters 272: 172-181.
  6. Pfaller MA (2012) Antifungal drug resistance: Mechanisms, epidemiology and consequences for treatment. Am J Med 125: S3-S13.
  7. Božovi´c M, Garzoli S, Sabatino M, Pepi F, Baldisserotto A, et al. (2017) Essential oil extraction, chemical analysis and anti-Candida activity of Calaminthanepeta (L.) Savi subsp. glandulosa (Req.) Ball-New Approaches. Molecules 22: 203.
  8. Di Santo R (2010) Natural products as antifungal agents against clinically relevant pathogens. Nat Prod Rep 27: 1084-1098.
  9. Silva C de B, Guterres SS, Weisheimer V, Schapoval EE (2008) Antifungal activity of the lemongrass oil and citral against Candida spp. Braz J Infect Dis 12: 63-66.
  10. Taweechaisupapong S, Aieamsaard J, Chitropas P, Khunkitti W (2012) Inhibitory effect of lemongrass oil and its major constituents on Candida biofilm and germ tube formation. South African J Bot 81: 95-102.
  11. Leite MCA, Bezerra AP de B, de Sousa JP, Guerra FQS, Lima E de O, et al. (2014) Evaluation of antifungal activity and mechanism of action of citral against Candida albicans. Evid Based Complement Alternat Mede CAM 2014: 1-9.
  12. de Sousa JP, Costa AOC, Leite MCA, Guerra FQS, da Silva VA, et al. (2016) Antifungal activity of citral by disruption of ergosterol biosynthesis in fluconazole resistant Candida tropicalis. Int J Trop Dis Health  11: 1-11.
  13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008) Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard, 3rd edn. CLSI document M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  14. Nett JE, Cain MT, Crawford K, Andes DR (2011) Optimizing a Candida biofilm microtiter plate model for measurement of antifungal susceptibility by tetrazolium salt assay. J Clin Microbiol 49: 1426-1433.
  15. Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, Ghannoum MA (2008) In vitro growth and analysis of Candida biofilms. Nat Protoc 3: 1909-1924.
  16. Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havli J, Olsen JV, Mann M, et al. (2006) In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc 1: 2856-2860.
  17. Cannon RD, Lamping E, Holmes AR, Niimi K, Tanabe K, et al. (2007) Candida albicans drug resistance another way to cope with stress. Microbiology 153: 3211-3217.
  18. Berman J, Sudbery PE (2002) Candida albicans: A molecular revolution built on lessons from budding yeast. Nat Rev Genet3: 918-930.
  19. Bizerra FC, Nakamura CV, De Poersch C, Estivalet Svidzinski TI, Borsato Quesada RM, et al. (2008) Characteristics of biofilm formation by Candida tropicalis and antifungal resistance. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 442-450.
  20. Li P, Seneviratne CJ, Alpi E, Vizcaino JA, Jin L, et al. (2015) Delicate metabolic control and coordinated stress response critically determine antifungal tolerance of Candida albicans biofilm persisters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6101-6112.
  21. Rogers PD, Vermitsky JP, Edlind TD, Hilliard GM (2006) Proteomic analysis of experimentally induced azole resistance in Candida glabrata. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 434-438.
  22. Shin DH, Jung S, Park SJ, Kim YJ, Ahn JM, et al. (2005) Characterization of thiol-specific antioxidant 1 (TSA1) of Candida albicans. Yeast 22: 907-918.
  23. Seneviratne CJ, Wang Y, Jin L, Abiko Y, Samaranayake LP, et al. (2008) Candida albicans biofilm formation is associated with increased anti-oxidative capacities. Proteomics 8: 2936-2947.
  24. Li L, Naseem S, Sharma S, Konopka JB (2015) Flavodoxin-Like Proteins Protect Candida albicans from Oxidative Stress and Promote Virulence. PLoS Pathogens 11: e1005147.
  25. Suliman HS, Appling DR, Robertus JD (2007) The gene for cobalamin-independent methionine synthase is essential in Candida albicans: A potential antifungal target. Arch Biochem Biophys 467: 218-226.
  26. Fuoli LA (2016) Amino acid biosynthetic pathways as antifungal targets for fungal infections. Virulence 7: 376-378.
  27. Park LW, Casey WM (1995) Physiological implications of sterol biosynthesis in yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol 49: 95-116.
  28. Montagnoli C, Sandini S, Bacci A, Romani L, La Valle R et al. (2004) Immunogenicity and protective effect of recombinant enolase of Candida albicans in a murine model of systemic candidiasis. Med Mycol 42: 319-324.
Citation: Chatrath A, Kumari P, Gangwar R, Prasad R (2018) Investigation of Differentially Expressed Proteins of Candida tropicalis Biofilm in Response to Citral. J Proteomics Bioinform 11: 057-0061.

Copyright: © 2018 Chatrath A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top