Advancements in Genetic Engineering
Open Access

Impact and Prospective of Gene Editing in Non-Human Organisms

Richard Wilson^{* *}Correspondence: Richard Wilson, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran, Email:

Author info »

Description

Gene editing has emerged as a groundbreaking technology that has the potential to revolutionize the field of biology. While its applications in humans have garnered significant attention, gene editing techniques also hold immense promise for non-human organisms. By manipulating their genetic makeup, scientists can unlock a range of possibilities, from improving crop yields and enhancing livestock to conserving endangered species and combating diseases. In this article, we explore the power and potential of gene editing in non-human organisms and its implications for various fields [1-4].

Improving agriculture and food security

Gene editing has the potential to address the challenges of feeding a growing global population and mitigating the impacts of climate change on agriculture. By editing the genes of crops, researchers can develop varieties that are more resistant to pests, diseases, and environmental stressors. For example, modifying genes responsible for drought tolerance or enhancing photosynthesis efficiency can significantly increase crop yields. Furthermore, gene editing can reduce the need for harmful pesticides and chemical inputs, making agriculture more sustainable and environmentally friendly.

Enhancing livestock health and productivity

Gene editing in non-human organisms extends beyond crops to livestock. By editing specific genes, scientists can develop livestock breeds with enhanced resistance to diseases, improved meat quality, and increased productivity. For instance, researchers can introduce genetic modifications to make livestock more resistant to common diseases such as foot-andmouth disease or African swine fever. Additionally, gene editing can be used to enhance the nutritional composition of animal products, leading to healthier food options for consumers [5-8].

Conservation efforts and biodiversity preservation

The ability to edit genes in non-human organisms offers new avenues for conservation efforts and biodiversity preservation. With the continuous loss of species due to habitat destruction and climate change, gene editing can potentially save endangered species from extinction. By editing the genomes of endangered animals, scientists can reintroduce individuals with enhanced genetic diversity, making them more resilient to environmental changes. However, ethical considerations and strict regulatory frameworks are essential to ensure responsible and transparent use of gene editing technologies in conservation efforts.

Combating infectious diseases and zoonotic threats

Zoonotic diseases, those transmitted between animals and humans, pose significant threats to global public health. Gene editing can play a crucial role in combatting infectious diseases by altering the genetic makeup of disease-carrying organisms. For example, researchers have explored using gene editing to make mosquitoes resistant to malaria or dengue fever, potentially reducing the spread of these deadly diseases. Additionally, gene editing in animals can help prevent the transmission of diseases from animals to humans, such as modifying genes to enhance resistance to zoonotic viruses.

Ethical considerations and regulatory frameworks

The power of gene editing in non-human organisms comes with ethical considerations and the need for robust regulatory frameworks. Questions regarding the impact on ecosystems, unintended consequences, and the potential for misuse must be addressed. Transparent dialogue and collaborations between scientists, policymakers, and the public are essential to establish guidelines for responsible gene editing practices. Striking a balance between scientific advancements and ethical considerations is crucial to harness the full potential of gene editing while ensuring the well-being of non-human organisms and ecosystems [9,10].

Conclusion

Gene editing in non-human organisms holds immense promise across various domains, from improving agriculture and enhancing livestock to preserving endangered species and combating infectious diseases. By harnessing the power of gene editing techniques, scientists can revolutionize biology and address pressing global challenges. However, careful consideration of ethical implications, collaboration, and robust regulatory frameworks are necessary to guide the responsible and ethical use of gene editing technologies. As we navigate this rapidly advancing field, it is crucial to strike a balance between scientific progress and the well-being of our planet's non-human inhabitants.

References

1. Small ID, Peeters N. The PPR motif-a TPR-related motif prevalent in plant organellar proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25(2):45-47.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2.  Delannoy E, Stanley WA, Bond CS, Small ID. Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins as sequence-specificity factors in post-transcriptional processes in organelles. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(6):1643-7164.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Toole ON, Hattori M, Andres C, Iida K, Lurin C, Schmitz-Linneweber C, et al. On the expansion of the pentatricopeptide repeat gene family in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25(6):1120-1128.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Schmitz-Linneweber C, Small I. Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins: A socket set for organelle gene expression. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13(12):663-670.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Salone V, Rüdinger M, Polsakiewicz M, Hoffmann B, Groth-Malonek M, Szurek B, et al. A hypothesis on the identification of the editing enzyme in plant organelles. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(22):4132-4138.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Rüdinger M, Polsakiewicz M, Knoop V. Organellar RNA editing and plant-specific extensions of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins in jungermanniid but not in marchantiid liverworts. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25(7):1405-1414.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Rüdinger M, Funk HT, Rensing SA, Maier UG, Knoop V. RNA editing: Only eleven sites are present in the Physcomitrella patens mitochondrial transcriptome and a universal nomenclature proposal. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009;281(5):473-481.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Zehrmann A, Verbitskiy D, van der Merwe JA, Brennicke A, Takenaka M. A DYW domain-containing pentatricopeptide repeat protein is required for RNA editing at multiple sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2009;21(2):558-567.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Hammani K, Okuda K, Tanz SK, Chateigner-Boutin AL, Shikanai T, Small I. A study of new Arabidopsis chloroplast RNA editing mutants reveals general features of editing factors and their target sites. Plant Cell. 2009;21(11):3686-3699.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10.  Kotera E, Tasaka M, Shikanai T. A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is essential for RNA editing in chloroplasts. Nature. 2005;433(7023):326-330.

    [Crossref][Google Scholar] [PubMed]