GET THE APP

Internal Medicine: Open Access

Internal Medicine: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2165-8048

+44 1300 500008

Commentary - (2023)Volume 13, Issue 6

Immunotherapy in Dialysis Patients with End Stage Renal Dialysis

Klian George*
 
*Correspondence: Klian George, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas South-Western Medical Centre, Texas, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

Patients with advanced cancer now have a far better prognosis because to immunomodulatory antibodies, which boost immunity. There is a lack of information regarding the use of inhibitory antibodies with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) in patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) receiving Hemo Dialysis (HD) or Peritoneal Dialysis (PD), despite the fact that these drugs do not have renal clearance. The first dialysis patients to be reported using ICI therapy were those who had refused a kidney transplant and were starting dialysis again while receiving ICI therapy.

A number of global single-center case reports and series over the past year have surfaced, indicating their safe usage in individuals with both HD and PD. End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients are particularly vulnerable to infection. Moreover, consistent statistics also show that this population has far fewer immunological reactions to vaccinations. ESRD patients also show concurrent aseptic low-grade inflammation. These clinical characteristics are similar to those seen in the elderly and indicate that inflammation, which is linked to the immune system's premature senescence, it is a crucial component of the immunological profile associated with end-stage renal disease. Furthermore, a number of compelling studies have demonstrated indications of accelerated immunological senescence in dialysis and chronic kidney disease patients relative to the general population.

With the exception of nivolumab, which is an IgG4 isotype, ICIs are humanized or human Immunoglobulin (Ig) antibodies of the IgG1 isotype. Their pharmacokinetic characteristics are comparable to those of other medicinal monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs). After being administered intravenously, they have a limited volume of distribution and are primarily restricted to the vascular space. They spread by rates of extravasation out of the vascular space via transcytosis and convective transport, they spread in the interstitial space by diffusion, convection, and antibody binding and finally, they are recycled or broken down inside cells by the newborn Fc Receptor (FcRn). Convection into the lymph is necessary for the elimination of ICIs from the interstitial space. Immune Check Point Inhibitors (CPIs) are a class of medications that alter adaptive immunity by blocking immune system checkpoints, which are generally responsible for preventing the onset of autoimmunity. T-cells have surface receptors such Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-associated Antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and Programmed Death-1 protein (PD-1), which down-regulate the cell when they bind to ligands released by antigen-presenting cells. As so, these immunological checkpoints have the effect of suppressing an undesired inflammatory response.

But some cancers also use this strategy to increase tumor survival and metastasis by overexpressing chemicals that bind to the T-cell PD-1 receptor. Overexpression of ligands ultimately results in the deactivation of T-cells that have infiltrated the tumor microenvironment, which prevents the killing of cancer cells.

Designing monoclonal antibody medications that prevent ligand binding to PD-1 and CTLA-4 receptors makes sense in light of this paradigm. This will enable T-cell rescue and restore antitumor immunity. Examples of such medications are ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and pembrolizumab and nivolumab, which are anti-PD-1.

Blocking immunological checkpoints, however, may raise the possibility of end organ damage and the emergence of pathologic autoimmunity. This is shown in individuals on CPI therapy as they suffer several endocrinopathies, colitis, hepatitis, and pneumonia. Although there is evidence of kidney damage in the clinical trials that have been published to date, the medications generally seem to be "renal safe."

Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) have higher rates of morbidity and mortality due in large part to premature thymic involution and inflammation. It is likely that there are several interconnected mechanisms. There are numerous scientific prospects to avoid or at least partially reverse immunological senescence related to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). The most crucial mechanisms causing early immunological aging in CKD patients should be accurately identified, as should the most effective treatment approaches to manage them.

Author Info

Klian George*
 
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas South-Western Medical Centre, Texas, USA
 

Citation: George K (2023) Immunotherapy in Dialysis Patients with End Stage Renal Dialysis. Intern Med. 13:435.

Received: 07-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. IME-23-28977; Editor assigned: 10-Nov-2023, Pre QC No. IME-23-28977(PQ); Reviewed: 24-Nov-2023, QC No. IME-23-28977; Revised: 01-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. IME-23-28977(R); Published: 08-Dec-2023 , DOI: 10.35248/2165-8048.23.13.435

Copyright: © 202 George K. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top